Overview of Technical Approaches

Similar documents
arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 16 Feb 2005

Overview of technical approaches to radio frequency interference mitigation

Spatial Filtering of RF Interference in Radio Astronomy Using a Reference Antenna Array

ASKAP Commissioning Update #7 April-July Latest results from the BETA test array

Mobile Radio Communications

Parkes 21 cm Intensity Mapping Experiments

Event Capture α First Light. Abstract

RFI Mitigation for the Parkes Galactic All-Sky Survey (GASS)

Instruments for studying the Epoch of Reionization (EOR) Presentation to CORF by Alan Rogers 27 May 09

An Introduction to ASKAP Bringing Radio Interferometers Into the Multi-pixel Era

Conversion from Linear to Circular Polarization and Stokes Parameters in FPGA. Koyel Das, Alan Roy, Gino Tuccari, Reinhard Keller

Radio Aspects of the Transient Universe

Telescopes of the future: SKA and SKA demonstrators

E-MERLIN and EVN/e-VLBI Capabilities, Issues & Requirements

Advanced Topic in Astrophysics Lecture 1 Radio Astronomy - Antennas & Imaging

Interference Problems at the Effelsberg 100-m Telescope

Array signal processing for radio-astronomy imaging and future radio telescopes

Polarimetry with Phased-Array Feeds

Sky Mapping: Continuum and polarization surveys with single-dish telescopes

Observation of neutral hydrogen using FFT spectrometer Argos on a 5m telescope

Search Strategies. Basic Problem: where to look? Possible Scenarios Powerful, omnidirectional beacons

The Future of Radio Astronomy. Karen O Neil

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 17 May 2000

A Study of RFI in the WindSat C- and X-Band Channels

2A1H Time-Frequency Analysis II

LOFAR for Pulsar. Ben Stappers ASTRON/UvA

Beamforming. A brief introduction. Brian D. Jeffs Associate Professor Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brigham Young University

Wide Field Searches for Radio Transients

Search for 21cm Reionization

Acoustic MIMO Signal Processing

The Eight-meter-wavelength Transient Array

Nanohertz Gravitational Waves and Pulsar Timing

ASKAP. and phased array feeds in astronomy. David McConnell CASS: ASKAP Commissioning and Early Science 16 November 2017

Recent progress with the BYU/NRAO phased array feed

Probing the Interstellar Medium on Solar System Size Scales. Alex S. Hill 2004 April 27

Radio Astronomy Summer School Introduction Early History of Radio Astronomy. Tatsuhiko Hasegawa (ASIAA)

Practical application of cyclic spectroscopy to pulsar signals

Deconvolving Primary Beam Patterns from SKA Images

CROSSCORRELATION SPECTROPOLARIMETRY IN SINGLE-DISH RADIO ASTRONOMY

Multiple Antennas. Mats Bengtsson, Björn Ottersten. Channel characterization and modeling 1 September 8, Signal KTH Research Focus

2A1H Time-Frequency Analysis II Bugs/queries to HT 2011 For hints and answers visit dwm/courses/2tf

An Introduction to Radio Astronomy

Development of Polarization Interferometer Based on Fourier Transform Spectroscopy for Thomson Scattering Diagnostics

Transient Cosmic Phenomena and their Influence on the Design of the SKA Radio Telescope

The Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope

ETA Observations of Crab Pulsar Giant Pulses

The Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME): Status and update. Juan Mena-Parra MIT Kavli Postdoctoral Fellow October 30, 2018

! Communication, 2.!

The OH Maser Line Receiving System for the Urumqi 25m Radio Telescope

Testing General Relativity using the Square Kilometre Array

Linear Optimum Filtering: Statement

Signals and Systems: Part 2

ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Week 3. Flat Fading Channels Envelope Distribution Autocorrelation of a Random Process

Root-MUSIC Time Delay Estimation Based on Propagator Method Bin Ba, Yun Long Wang, Na E Zheng & Han Ying Hu

Performance Analysis for Strong Interference Remove of Fast Moving Target in Linear Array Antenna

University of Groningen. The Effelsberg Bonn HI Survey EBHIS Kerp, J.; Winkle, B.; Kalberla, P.M.W. Published in: EPRINTS-BOOK-TITLE

Winds on Titan: First results from the Huygens Doppler Wind Experiment

HERA Memo 51: System Noise from LST Di erencing March 17, 2017

SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR RADIO ASTRONOMICAL ARRAYS

Phased Array Feed Development for the SKA. SKA AIP Meeting 8 June 2017 PAF Consortium

Solar Radiophysics with HF Radar

Search Strategies. Basic Problem: where to look? Possible Scenarios Powerful, omnidirectional beacons

How do you make an image of an object?

Adaptive Noise Cancellation

The Canadian Hydrogen Intensity. Mapping Experiment. Matt Dobbs

Probability and Statistics for Final Year Engineering Students

A Case for Development of the UWL Receiver for Parkes

Observational Astrophysics 2

Short-Spacings Correction From the Single-Dish Perspective

Lab 2 Working with the X-Band Interferometer

A New Spectrometer for the Green Bank Telescope

Lesson 1. Optimal signalbehandling LTH. September Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling, Hayes, M:

Pseudocontinuum Polarimetry with the GBT Brian S. Mason v.1 31may07 v.2 03sep07. Abstract

IPS and Solar Imaging

Space mission BRАUDE-M. Radio telescope on the farside of the Moon

Can we do this science with SKA1-mid?

Implementation of a Space-Time-Channel-Filter

LASA and the WFBT: Two Concepts for All-Sky Transient Telescopes

Sensitivity. Bob Zavala US Naval Observatory. Outline

ENSC327 Communications Systems 2: Fourier Representations. Jie Liang School of Engineering Science Simon Fraser University

Cast of Characters. Some Symbols, Functions, and Variables Used in the Book

Continuum Observing. Continuum Emission and Single Dishes

Radio Interferometry and Aperture Synthesis

Surveying the magnetic field of the Milky Way with SKA1

Moon disc temperature as a function of phase at 1700 MHz

Fast Radio Bursts. Laura Spitler Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie 11. April 2015

J.-M Friedt. FEMTO-ST/time & frequency department. slides and references at jmfriedt.free.fr.

Introduction to LBW for ALFALFA followup. Martha Haynes UAT

Last time: small acoustics

MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY

Digital Signal Processing

CHIME. Kendrick Smith on behalf of the CHIME collaboration Barcelona, September 2015

NOISE ROBUST RELATIVE TRANSFER FUNCTION ESTIMATION. M. Schwab, P. Noll, and T. Sikora. Technical University Berlin, Germany Communication System Group

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 6 Jan 2012

An Introduction to Radio Astronomy

Very Large Array Sky Survey

Novel Waveform Design and Scheduling For High-Resolution Radar and Interleaving

The 158 Micron [C II] Line: A Measure of Global Star Formation Activity in Galaxies Stacey et al. (1991) ApJ, 373, 423

SETI on the SKA. US SKA Consortium Meeting Feb 28, Jill Tarter Bernard M. Oliver Chair SETI Institute

PROTEIN NMR SPECTROSCOPY

Transcription:

Overview of Technical Approaches Robust receivers Edit / excise / blank - frequency / time domain - might lose/corrupt astronomy signal Cancel / subtract / null - identify / characterize / subtract - frequency / time domain - treat RFI as carefully as astronomy signals - goal = keep astronomy (known distortions)

Overview of Technical Approaches Edit / excise / blank highly non-linear Cancel / subtract / null doing THIS may exclude this

Outline: multi-path scattering ( time-freq equivalence) application of correlation coefficient closure relations (and adaptive filter equivalent) eigen decomposition of correlation matrix ( equiv to array calibration / nulling )

R F I

Antenna I I(t) = Σ h α (t) * i o (t τ α ) Impulse Response h(t) for each path α Signal radiated by transmitter with DELAY τ α Convolution operator

Antenna I I(t) = Σ h α (t) * i o (t τ α ) α I(f) = (Σ G α (f) e- i2π τ αf ) I o (f) Time Domain Frequency Domain = G(f) I o (f)

Instrumental constraints Time Domain: must encompass maximum delay T delay Frequency Domain: need frequency resolution f f < 1 / T delay If T delay = D/c = 1 km/c, f < 300 khz <<?

multipath summary not fatal for cancellation in frequency domain nor in time domain, with suitable adaptive filters (?? strong airport radars -- Arecibo??)

Canceller using Closure Information S R x g A S + g 1 I Σ g A S I - g 1 I Cross Correlation Signal Processing X g 1 g 3 g 3 I I

Cross correlation: single polarization feed with 2 reference signals 1. Pol A G 1 G 4 * I o 2 3. Ref 1 G 3 G 4 * I o 2 4. Ref 2?? G 1 G 3 = G 1 G 4 * I o 2 G 3 G 4 * I 2 o

Cross correlation: single polarization feed with 2 reference signals 1. Pol A G 1 G 4 * I o 2 = C 14 3. Ref 1 4. Ref 2 G 3 G 4 * I o 2 = C 34 G G 1 G 4 * I 2 1 o = G 3 G 3 G 4 * I 2 o = C 14 (f) C 34 (f)

Practical Application: Auto-Correlation Spectrometer S A/C spectrometer Power Spectrum P(f) g 2 A S 2 + g 2 1 I 2 I g 1 2 I 2 = g 1 g 3 * I 2 g 4 g 1 * I 2 g 4 g 3 * I 2 = C 13 (f) C 14 *(f) C 34 *(f) Gain closure relation for an unresolved source

Practical Application: Auto-Correlation Spectrometer S A/C spectrometer Power Spectrum P(f) g 2 A S 2 + g 2 1 I 2 I g 1 2 I 2 = Advantage: g 1 g 3 * I 2 g 4 g 1 * I 2 g 4 g 3 * I 2 = C 13 (f) C 14 *(f) C 34 *(f) Cross Correlation Spectra NO BIAS due to NOISE power

Cross correlation: single polarization feed with 2 reference signals 1. Pol A G 1 G 3 * I o 2 = C 13 G 1 G 4 * I o 2 = C 14 3. Ref 1 4. Ref 2 G 3 G 4 * I o 2 = C 34 A/C Spectrum Contamination g 1 2 I 2 = C 13 (f) C 14 *(f) C 34 *(f)

Cross correlation: dual polarization feed with 2 reference signals 1. Pol A 2. Pol B G 1 G 3 * I o 2 = C 13 G 1 G 4 * I o 2 = C 14 3. Ref 1 G 2 G 3 * I o 2 G 2 G 4 * I o 2 = C 23 = C 24 G 3 G 4 * I o 2 = C 34 4. Ref 2

650 720 MHz Hydrogen @ Z~1 Real observation w. RFI Cancellation Little Ord Staveley-Smith Reynolds Catlin Dawson

courtesy of M. Smith 37 40 43 46 600 700 800 MHz

Line of sight to feed over edge of dish

known broadcast towers Mt Canobolas Mt Ulandra

Yagi

21 db gain

CPSR2 Swinburne University 64 MHz BW 8K channels for Four Feeds real time spectroscopy + cancellation

Frequency [channels] Ref 1 Relative Signal Strength [db] Ref 2 Pks A Pks B

Frequency [channels] Ref 1 Relative Signal Strength [db] Ref 2 Pks A Pks B

Time outside the dig-tv band Freq 10 minutes, 8 MHz

Time dig-tv band Freq 10 minutes, 8 MHz

Time Cancelled Freq 10 minutes, 8 MHz birdies not in Refs => not cancelled => astro not damaged noise level is reduced to system noise no added rfi power

Spectral Domain Contamination: the VOLTAGE spectrum Estimate { g 1 (f) I(f) } = X 13 (f) g 3 (f) I(f) stable on 0.1 second time scale C 14 (f) C 34 (f) Update every 1 second f ch Time Domain Contamination: Ref Horn Estimate { g 1 I(t) } = x 13 (t) * g 3 I(t) Effectively FIR filter coefficients

FIR Coefficients + Delay 0.1µs steps Time 0.1 sec steps

Pol A Pol B using Ref. 3 using Ref. 4

Dynamic Pulsar Spectra Pol. A Pol. B Phase Average Spectra Frequency

Dynamic Pulsar Spectra Cancellation Applied Pol. A Pol. B Phase Average Spectra Frequency

Summary: Gain closure relation and its time-domain equivalent subtract voltages I(t) => removes rfi noise phase coherency of Corr. Fncts => same effect in freq. domain

Arrays and Eigen Decomposition: Australia Telescope Compact Array *Bell, Kesteven, Ekers, Sault, et al 2001 *Jonathon Kocz (ANU)

Bell s Bucket Rx (with and without reference antennas)

Steve Ellingson: 17 Dec 1999 A Variation on the Ekers-Sault Correlation Idea Also, Leshem, van der Veen, Boonstra Crosscorrelation matrix Eigen decomposition Partition

Refs

Refs P [db] channels

Refs Coupling of Refs to Astro 512 spectral channels => 512 12x12 correlation matrices

need to solve 512 correlation matrices for each channel: R = U Λ U H r 1,1 r 1,2 r 1,12 r 2,1 r 2,2 g 1,1 g 1,2 g 1,12 g 2,1 g 2,2 P 1 0 0 0 P 2 g* 11 g* 21 g* 12,1 g* 12 g 22 *. =... r 12,1 r 12,12 g 12,1 g 12,12 0 P 12 g* 1,12 g* 12,12 Complex Voltage Gains 12 Powers g 1,1 g 1,2 g 1,12 = vector with 12 coefficients coupling the 12 P i to Antenna 1A

consider Special Case: Calibration of an Array point at bright calibration source S ν one source dominates powers r 1,1 r 1,2 r 1,12 r 2,1 r 2,2. r 12,1 r 12,12 = g 1,1 g 2,1. g 12,1 S ν 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 g* 11 g* 21 g* 12,1 The vector g 1,1 g 2,1. has the complex voltage gains g 12,1

Do 512 decompositions get spectra for 12 eigenvalues Kocz 2004 Power [ db ] Frequency channel

throwing away P 1 the Autocorrelation Spectra Power [ db ] before after

Nulling setting P1 = 0 equivalent to placing a null on the interferer! but no directional information has been included The math solution provides: * strength of interferer * gain coefficients

Where is directional information? Phase spectra for g 1i Phase [radians]

Summary: multi-path scattering ( time-freq equivalence) application of correlation coefficient closure relations (and FIR filter equivalent) eigen decomposition of correlation matrix ( compared to array calibration / nulling )