Neutrino Physics and Nuclear Astrophysics: the LUNA-MV project at Gran Sasso

Similar documents
Underground nuclear astrophysics and the Sun

PoS(FRAPWS2016)005. LUNA: hydrogen, helium and carbon burning under Gran Sasso. Carlo Broggini. INFN-Sezione di Padova

Latest results from LUNA

Perspectives on Nuclear Astrophysics

The LUNA - MV project at the Gran Sasso Laboratory

Nuclear astrophysics at Gran Sasso Laboratory: LUNA experiment

LUNA-400 and LUNA-MV: present and future of Nuclear Astrophysics at LNGS

Hands on LUNA: Detector Simulations with Geant4

Nuclear Astrophysics Underground Status & Future

«Ettore Majorana» International School of Subnuclear Physics Erice, 14th-23rd June 2016

References and Figures from: - Basdevant, Fundamentals in Nuclear Physics

Metallicities in stars - what solar neutrinos can do

Ness LUNA II facility. INFN underground Gran Sasso Laboratories. P. Corvisiero INFN - Italy

Nuclear astrophysics studies with charged particles in hot plasma environments

MAJOR NUCLEAR BURNING STAGES

Nuclear Astrophysics - I

at Gran Sasso Laboratories, Italy

Hydrogen & Helium Burning in Stars

Reaction rates in the Laboratory

Nuclear Astrophysics

Neutrino physics and nuclear astrophysics:

Cross section measurements of fusion reactions at astrophysically relevant energies: the LUNA experiment

Experimental study of the 14 N(p,γ) 15 O reaction

Stellar Interior: Physical Processes

Solar Neutrinos. Solar Neutrinos. Standard Solar Model

Experimental Nuclear Astrophysics: Lecture 1. Chris Wrede National Nuclear Physics Summer School June 19 th, 2018

Direct measurement of the 17 O(p,α) 14 N reaction at energies of astrophysical interest at LUNA

DIANA A NEXT GENERATION DEEP UNDERGROUND ACCELERATOR FACILITY

Nuclear Binding Energy

What Powers the Stars?

Direct measurement of the 2H(α,γ)6Li cross section at energies of astrophysical interest

13 Synthesis of heavier elements. introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

:Lecture 27: Stellar Nucleosynthesis. Cassieopia A

Evolution and nucleosynthesis prior to the AGB phase

Stars and their properties: (Chapters 11 and 12)

Astrophysical Nucleosynthesis

IB Test. Astrophysics HL. Name_solution / a) Describe what is meant by a nebula [1]

Neutron-to-proton ratio

Primer: Nuclear reactions in Stellar Burning

Last Time... We discussed energy sources to a shell of stellar material:

Stellar Evolution: what do we know?

Recent results and status of the

Nucleosynthesis. W. F. McDonough 1. Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai , Japan. (Dated: Tuesday 24 th April, 2018)

THIRD-YEAR ASTROPHYSICS

Interactions. Laws. Evolution

In the Beginning. After about three minutes the temperature had cooled even further, so that neutrons were able to combine with 1 H to form 2 H;

Fundamental Stellar Parameters. Radiative Transfer. Stellar Atmospheres. Equations of Stellar Structure

Astronomy 404 October 9, 2013

Reaction rates for nucleosynthesys of light and intermediate-mass isotopes

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 4 Feb 2009

Section 12. Nuclear reactions in stars Introduction

Nuclear Astrophysics with DRAGON at ISAC:

Scientific goal in Nuclear Astrophysics is to explore:

Preliminary results of the indirect study of the 12 C( 12 C,α) 20 Ne reaction via the THM applied to the 16 O( 12 C,α 20 Ne )α reaction

Nuclear Astrophysics

Nuclear Astrophysics II

Chapter CHAPTER 11 ORIGIN OF THE ELEMENTS

High-precision (p,t) reactions to determine reaction rates of explosive stellar processes Matić, Andrija

Radiochemistry and Nuclear Methods of Analysis

The Origin of the Elements between Iron and the Actinides Probes for Red Giants and Supernovae

Lecture #1: Nuclear and Thermonuclear Reactions. Prof. Christian Iliadis

Lifetime measurement of the MeV state in 15O with the AGATA Demonstrator

Conceptos generales de astrofísica

1. Introduction on Astroparticle Physics Research options

ORIGIN OF THE ELEMENETS

Advanced Stellar Astrophysics

PoS(ENAS 6)050. Resonances in 19 Ne with relevance to the astrophysically important 18 F(p,α) 15 O reaction

He-Burning in massive Stars

Stellar Explosions (ch. 21)

Measurement of nuclear recoil responses of NaI(Tl) crystal for dark matter search

Introductory Astrophysics A113. Death of Stars. Relation between the mass of a star and its death White dwarfs and supernovae Enrichment of the ISM

Astronomy Ch. 21 Stellar Explosions. MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Today in Astronomy 142

Future research of 12 C(a,g) 16 O. Claudio Ugalde

Chapter IX: Nuclear fusion

Nuclear Astrophysics

The Standard Solar Model. PHYSUN L'Aquila

Stellar energy generation on the main sequence

The Short Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab

Figure 2.11 from page 152 of Exploring the Heart of Ma2er

Type II Supernovae Overwhelming observational evidence that Type II supernovae are associated with the endpoints of massive stars: Association with

ILE, Osaka University ILE, Osaka February 3, 2014

Neutron capture cross sections of 69,71 Ga at n TOF EAR1

Detection of MeV scale neutrinos and the solar energy paradigm

Neutrino sources. Atmospheric neutrinos Solar neutrinos Supernova neutrinos High energy neutrino sources Cosmic neutrino background

Stellar Astronomy Sample Questions for Exam 4

Carbon Burning in the Universe and the Laboratory

Lecture notes 8: Nuclear reactions in solar/stellar interiors

H/He burning reactions on unstable nuclei for Nuclear Astrophysics

PoS(NIC XI)019. Low energy beam induced background studies for a. 12 C( 12 C,p) 23 Na reaction cross section measurement

Ay 1 Lecture 8. Stellar Structure and the Sun

Reading and Announcements. Read Chapter 14.1, 14.2 Homework #6 due Tuesday, March 26 Exam #2, Thursday, March 28

The Later Evolution of Low Mass Stars (< 8 solar masses)

James Maxwell ( )

How Nature makes gold

Experimental Initiatives in Nuclear Astrophysics

Guiding Questions. The Deaths of Stars. Pathways of Stellar Evolution GOOD TO KNOW. Low-mass stars go through two distinct red-giant stages

The Deaths of Stars 1

Stellar Evolution: The Deaths of Stars. Guiding Questions. Pathways of Stellar Evolution. Chapter Twenty-Two

Chapters 12 and 13 Review: The Life Cycle and Death of Stars. How are stars born, and how do they die? 4/1/2009 Habbal Astro Lecture 27 1

Transcription:

Neutrino Physics and Nuclear Astrophysics: the LUNA-MV project at Gran Sasso I.N.F.N., Sezione di Genova, Italy Via Dodecanneso, 16146 Genoa (Italy) E-mail: sandra.zavatarelli@ge.infn.it Solar neutrinos emitted by fusion reactions occurring in the Sun provide a unique and direct way to study the interior of our stars: a precise knowledge of reactions producing neutrinos is mandatory to use these neutrinos as probes. Unfortunately many key reactions are still missing high precision data. The goal of nuclear astrophysics is to provide a deeper knowledge of the nuclear reactions ruling the stellar evolution and the synthesis of the elements of the periodic table. Deep underground in the Gran Sasso laboratory, the cross-sections of the several hydrogen burning reactions have been measured right down to the energies of astrophysical interest by the LUNA (Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics) Collaboration. At the end of 2018, a new window to the study of helium and carbon burning will by opened by the installation in Hall B of Gran Sasso of a new.5 MV single-ended accelerator (LUNA-MV) able to provide hydrogen, helium and carbon high current beams: this new facility will allow to aggress the study of key reactions shaping the evolution of massive stars towards their final fate. The present contribution is aimed to summarize the main results obtained during the solar phase of LUNA and to highlight their influence on our understanding of the properties of the neutrino and of the Sun. Finally, the future of LUNA during the next decade will be outlined. EPS-HEP2017, European Physical Society conference on High Energy Physics 5-12 July 2017 Venice, Italy 1 Speaker on behalf of the LUNA Collaboration Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Sandra Zavatarelli1

1. LUNA and the solar fusion reactions As highlighted in Fig. 1a after the d(p,γ)he reaction the pp-chain bifurcates into the pp-i and pp-ii/pp-iii terminations. The branching between these terminations is constrained to the ratio of the He(He, 2p)4He and He(α,γ)7Be cross sections: as an increase in the cross section of He(He, 2p)4He would have reduced the branching to the ppii and ppiii the possibility of an undiscovered narrow resonance at energies beyond the reach of early experiments was first raised by Fetisov and Kopysov and Fowler [4] in 1972 as a possible explanation to the solar neutrino deficit. This stimulated the LUNA Collaboration in the 1990 s to map the cross-section in the solar Gamow peak with a small home-made 50 kv accelerator. The measurements were extended up to the lower edge of the Gamow peak (16keV), with an high efficiency detection setup realized with eight Si detectors forming a double squared box: the signature of a fusion event was given by the proton-proton coincidence over a couple of detectors [5]. LUNA put in evidence that the He(He,2p)4He cross-section is indeed slightly increasing at the thermal energy as expected because of the electron screening effect but there is no evidence at all for any resonance: therefore the possible nuclear physics solution to the solar neutrino problem was ruled out. The neutrino fluxes from 7Be electron capture reactions and 8B decay strictly linked the He(α,γ)7Be cross section and its depedence on the stellar conditions. This reaction (Q-value = 1.586 MeV) is a radiative capture reaction into the ground state or the first excited state (Ex = 429 kev) of 7Be. The ground state of 7Be decays by electron capture into 7Li with a half-life of 5.22 ± 0.06, populating in 10% of decay the first excited state of 7Li at Ex = 478 kev (deexciting later on with gamma emission to the ground state). The LUNA research activity on 2 Fusion reaction cross sections shape the element formation in the earliest stages of the Universe (Big Bang nucleosynthesis) and in all the stellar objects formed later on: they control the energy generation and the evolution of stars. In the Sun, hydrogen is transformed into helium predominantly via the pp cycle, a chain of reactions releasing 26.7 MeV, and a small fraction still very uncertain, around 1%, through the CNO cycle. All these fusion reactions occur in a very well defined energy range, the so-called Gamow peak that in the case of the Sun is typically below 0 kev: as a result, reaction cross sections can be extremely low, down to the femto-barn level, and a direct investigation of thermonuclear reaction rates in a laboratory at the Earth s surface is very difficult because of cosmic background. The LUNA (Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics) collaboration [1] has demonstrated that the low-background environment of an underground laboratory like the Gran Sasso National Laboratory (Italy) is the perfect place to perform direct measurements at the relevant astrophysical energies. LUNA started as a pilot project with a 50 kv accelerator and still remains the only facility in the world running an accelerator deep underground, presently a 400 kv accelerator [2] equipped with hydrogen and helium beams. Common features of the two facilities are the intense beam currents, the long-term stability, and the precise beam energy determination. The first very relevant LUNA contribution to the neutrino physics was the exclusion of the existence of a possible resonance in the cross section of He(He,2p)4He at solar energies[].

He(α,γ)7Be was designed in order to exploit two different techniques: in the first approach direct α-capture γ-rays were detected (prompt γ method), while, in the second one, the delayed 7 Be-decay γ-rays were observed (activation method). Both method gave consistent results as shown in fig. 2 (left) and LUNA was able to achive a high precision result (%)[6]. According to [7] the present uncertainty on the 7Be solar neutrino flux is of 7% being the contribution of the He(α,γ)7Be cross section reduced to 4.6% and of He(He, 2p)4He to 2.1%. The precision of 8B neutrino flux is worse, at the level of 14%, being the He(α,γ)7Be contribution to the total error budget of only 4.6%. The other relevant contribution to the uncertainty ar in this case the opacity (6.7%), the diffusion coefficients (2.8%) and the 7Be(p,γ)8B cross section (7.7%). Though the CNO cycle is expected to provide a minor contribution (~ 1%) [7] to the nuclear energy generation in the Sun (with the proton-proton chain being the dominant source), a substantial flux of neutrinos is released by the 1N(β+ν)1C and 15O(β+ν)15N decays in the most central regions where the CN cycle operates in nuclear equilibrium regime. The predictions for CNO neutrino fluxes are not very precise because the CNO fusion reactions have been not studied as efficiently as the pp reactions, since the Coulomb barrier is higher for the CNO reactions, implying a greater sensitivity to details of the solar model. The two neutrino fluxes Φ(1N) and Φ(15O) depend almost linearly on the astrophysical S-factor S(E) of the 14N(p,γ)15O reaction. Therefore, this reaction is important to precisely constrain the CNO cycle in the SSM. An extensive study was pursued at the LUNA 400 kv facility in the energy range 70-70 kev in the center of mass system with solid Ti-N targets and alternating a high resolution HP-Ge detector and solid Ti-N targets and an high efficiency BGO 4π-summing crystal and a N2 windowless gas target. The astrophysical factor obtained at LUNA [8,9] was a factor 0.6 lower than previously used and although this value has been anticipated based on older data but different extrapolation methods, the LUNA results settled the matter. As a consequence, the CNO neutrino fluxes were decreased by the same factor and also the effect on the age of globular clusters, hence on the lower limit to the age of the Universe, was relevant: with the rate stellar evolutionaty models predicted a typical increase of 0.7-1.0 Gyr (with an uncertainity of ± 0.5 Gyr) for the ages of the universe. The 400 kv current LUNA accelerator and the unique low-background conditions of the underground LNGS laboratory are indeed perfectly suited to study most of the proton-capture reactions involved in the stellar H burning. On the other hand, a beam of higher energy is Fig.1 Solar fusion reaction: (left) pp-chain and (right) CNO cycle (for details see [])

required to extend these studies to reactions between heavier isotopes, as those operating during more advanced phases of stellar evolution, namely the He and the C burnings. 2. The LUNA-MV project The LUNA MV project has been developed to overcome such a limit: a new.5 MV single-ended accelerator is going be installed in Hall B of Gran Sasso at the end of 2018 and it will provide hydrogen, helium and carbon (also doubly ionized) high current beams [1]. The new facility will be devoted to aggress the study of those key reactions of helium and carbon burning that determine and shape both the evolution of massive stars towards their final fate and the nucleosynthesis of most of the elements in the Universe. As example, the 12C(α,γ)16O reactions that represent the Holy Grail of nuclear astrophysics since it determines the C/O ratio left at the end of the He burning. This is a fundamental quantity affecting, for instance, white dwarf cooling timescale and the outcomes of both type Ia and core-collapse supernovae. Another fundamental process is the 12C+12C fusion: the temperature at which C burning takes place depends on its rate, the larger the rate, the lower the C-burning temperature and the stellar mass limit for C ignition. This limit separates the progenitors of white dwarfs, nova and type Ia supernovae, from those of core-collapse supernovae, neutron stars, and stellar mass black holes and therefore it controls the estimations of the expected numbers of these objects in a given stellar population, a quantity very relevant also to predict the possible collaps and gravitational wave emissions. But even if more extensively studied, several important processes of H-burning are presently known at energies well above the Gamow peak: theoretical extrapolations to low energies are therefore unavoidable. The most popular methods are based on the R-matrix analyses [8] that for reliable extrapolations require nuclear physics informations obtained over a wide energy range. As shown if Fig.2 (right) the cross-section of 14N(p,γ)15O here displayed as the astrophysical S-factor for the ground-state transition is still insufficiently constrained by a good global fit of all available data [10]: this reaction has an uncertainty of about 8% when 4 Fig.2 (Left) Overview of all existing measurements of the He(α,γ)7Be reaction S-factor; (Right) Astrophysical S-factor of 14N(p,γ)15O for the ground state transition: the result of three different R-matrix fit are shown [].

. Conclusions The cosmic silence of the underground LNGS laboratory and the 50 kv and later on, the 400 kv LUNA accelerators, have demostrated to be the perfect blend to push toward stellar energies the study of the proton-capture reactions involved in the stellar H burning. At the end of 2018, a new.5 MV single-ended accelerator will be installed in Hall B of Gran Sasso able to provide hydrogen, helium and carbon high current beams: this facility will open a new window to the study of helium and carbon burning key reactions that shape the evolution of massive stars towards their final fate and the nucleosynthesis of most of the elements in the Universe. References [1] https://luna.lngs.infn.it/ [2] A. Formicola et al., The LUNA II 400 kv accelerator, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A507 (200) 609 [] A. Formicola, P. Corvisiero and G. Gervino, The nuclear physics of the hydrogen burning in the Sun, Eur. Phys. J. A52 (2016) 7 [4] V.N. Fetisov, Y.S. Kopysov, Nucl. Phys. A29 (1975) 511, W.A. Fowler, Nature. 28 (1972) 24 [5] R. Bonetti et al, Phys. Rev. Letter 82 (1999) 5205 [6] F. Confortola et al, Physical Review C 75 (2007) 06580 [7] A. Serenelli, Alive and well: A short review about stardard solar models, Eur. Phys. J. A52 (2016)7 [8] A. Formicola et al, Astrophysical S-factor of 14N(p,γ)15O, Phys. Lett. B591 (2004) 61 [9] M. Marta et al., The 14N(p,γ)15O reaction studied with a composite detector, Phys. Rev. C8 (2011) 045804 [10] Q. Li et al., Cross Section of 14N(p,γ)15O in the CNO cycle Phys. Rev. C9 (2016) 055806 5 extrapolated to the solar Gamow peak. A new and comprehensive study of the 14N(p,γ)15O reaction will be needed to cover a wide energy range. A renewed effort will be pursued at LUNA and it will involve both LUNA accelerators: the existing LUNA 400 kv machine as well as the future LUNA.5 MV facility. The combination of the two systems will allow to cover the necessary energy range with a sufficient overlap and without any hole between 200 kev and 1.5 MeV. The 14N(p,γ)15O reaction will allow also to perform the commissioning and the tuning of LUNA MV accelerator. We remind that the 14N(p,γ)15O is also very important in connection with the solar metallicity problem: it controls the speed of the whole CNO cycle since it proceeds with the slowest rate. Since the CN-cycle keeps an almost linear dependence on the C+N abundance in the core, the neutrino fluxes can be used as accurate tools to probe the total CN abundance. At present the error budget in the C+N estimation is totally dominated by the uncertainties (~ 11%) in the cross section of the reactions 7Be(p,γ)8B and 14N(p,γ)15O. Clearly, reducing the uncertainty of the latter reaction with LUNA MV will importantly contribute to set more stringent constraints on the central chemical composition of the Sun.