arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 18 Dec 2017

Similar documents
Discovery of a New Gamma-Ray Binary: 1FGL J

Bright gamma-ray sources observed by DArk Matter Particle Explorer

Fermi-LAT and WMAP observations of the SNR Puppis A

Mattia Di Mauro Eric Charles, Matthew Wood

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 28 Aug 2015

H.E.S.S. Unidentified Gamma-ray Sources in a Pulsar Wind Nebula Scenario And HESS J

Recent Observations of Supernova Remnants

Correlated GeV TeV Gamma-Ray Emission from Extended Sources in the Cygnus Region

Fermi Source Analyses and Identifying VERITAS Candidates

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 16 Jan 2018

Discovery of TeV Gamma-ray Emission Towards Supernova Remnant SNR G Last Updated Tuesday, 30 July :01

VERITAS detection of VHE emission from the optically bright quasar OJ 287

VERITAS detection of VHE emission from the optically bright quasar OJ 287

Gamma-ray observations of millisecond pulsars with the Fermi LAT. Lucas Guillemot, MPIfR Bonn. NS2012 in Bonn 27/02/12.

The XMM-Newton (and multiwavelength) view of the nonthermal supernova remnant HESS J

Pulsar Wind Nebulae as seen by Fermi-Large Area Telescope

PoS(extremesky2009)018

Indirect Dark Matter Searches in the Milky Way Center with the LAT on board Fermi

Gamma-ray variability of radio-loud narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies

Gamma-ray emission at the base of the Fermi bubbles. Dmitry Malyshev, Laura Herold Erlangen Center for Astroparticle Physics

The gamma-ray source-count distribution as a function of energy

PoS(INTEGRAL 2012)090

A Galaxy in VHE Gamma-rays: Observations of the Galactic Plane with the H.E.S.S. array

PoS(Extremesky 2011)009

Constraints on cosmic-ray origin from gamma-ray observations of supernova remnants

Sources of GeV Photons and the Fermi Results

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 13 Jul 2015

A New View of the High-Energy γ-ray Sky with the Fermi Telescope

On the origin of gamma-ray emission toward SNR

Supernova Remnants as Cosmic Ray Accelerants. By Jamie Overbeek Advised by Prof. J. Finley

Arrival directions of the highest-energy cosmic rays detected by the Pierre Auger Observatory

Radio counterparts of gamma-ray pulsars

The First Fermi LAT SNR Catalog SNR and Cosmic Ray Implications

Radio Observations of TeV and GeV emitting Supernova Remnants

The High-Energy Interstellar Medium

HESS J : A new gamma-ray binary?

Fermi-Large Area Telescope Observations of Pulsar Wind Nebulae and their associated pulsars

Gamma-Rays from Radio Galaxies: Fermi-LAT

Fermi: Highlights of GeV Gamma-ray Astronomy

Multiwaveband Observations of the TeV Blazar PKS with HESS, Fermi, RXTE and Swift

The Characterization of the Gamma-Ray Excess from the Central Milky Way

Sequence Obs ID Instrument Exposure uf Exposure f Date Observed Aimpoint (J2000) (ks) (ks) (α, δ)

Using the Fermi-LAT to Search for Indirect Signals from Dark Matter Annihilation

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 20 Apr 2017

GRAINE Project: a balloon-borne emulsion gamma-ray telescope

Status of the MAGIC telescopes

A. Chen (INAF-IASF Milano) On behalf of the Fermi collaboration

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

Active Galactic Nuclei in the MeV-GeV band (first results from Fermi)

Fermi LAT data analysis

PoS(SWIFT 10)142. The Swift-XRT observations of HBL Source 1ES

Searching for and Characterizing GeV Gamma-ray Binaries from Multiwavelength Observations

The Cygnus Region - a prime target for cosmic ray accelerators

Misaligned AGN with Fermi-Lat:

Constraining dark matter signal from a combined analysis of Milky Way satellites using the Fermi-LAT arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.

Gamma-ray emitting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies and their place in the AGN zoo

The VERITAS Survey of the Cygnus Region of the Galaxy

Fermi Large Area Telescope:

A New Method for Characterizing Unresolved Point Sources: applications to Fermi Gamma-Ray Data

HAWC Observation of Supernova Remnants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae

Nikolay Topchiev for the GAMMA-400 Collaboration High-energy gamma-ray studying with GAMMA-400

NuSTAR observation of the Arches cluster: X-ray spectrum extraction from a 2D image

Radio and gamma-ray emission in Faint BL Lacs

Search for Pulsed Emission in Archival VERITAS Data

A pulsar wind nebula associated with PSR J as the powering source of TeV J

The radio/gamma-ray connection in Active Galactic Nuclei in the Fermi era

Prospects for Observations of Very Extended and Diffuse Sources with VERITAS. Josh Cardenzana

Not only typical flaring blazars in the Fermi gamma-ray sky. The strange cases of SBS and PKS

On the scientific motivation for a wide field-of-view TeV gamma-ray observatory in the Southern Hemisphere

Blazars behind the Magellanic Clouds

Sgr A : from 10 0 to m in 3000 seconds

Hughes et al., 1998 ApJ, 505, 732 : ASCA. Westerlund, 1990 A&ARv, 2, 29 : Distance to LMC 1 ) ) (ergs s F X L X. 2 s 1. ) (ergs cm

The EVLA Nova (ENova) Project: First Results

PoS(NEUTEL2017)079. Blazar origin of some IceCube events

Science of Compact X-Ray and Gamma-ray Objects: MAXI and GLAST

The γ-ray Milky Way above 10 GeV: Distinguishing Sources from Diffuse Emission

AGILE and Blazars: the Unexpected, the Unprecedented, and the Uncut

GRAINE project: Cosmic Gamma-ray Observation by Balloon-Borne Telescope with Nuclear Emulsion

The X-Ray Counterpart of the Gamma-Ray Sky

LAT Automated Science Processing for Gamma-Ray Bursts

PoS(extremesky2009)103

Interstellar gamma rays. New insights from Fermi. Andy Strong. on behalf of Fermi-LAT collaboration. COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Bremen, July 2010

Multi-Wavelength Observations of Known, and Searches for New, Gamma-ray Binaries

A New TeV Source in the Vicinity of Cygnus OB2

New Radio Millisecond Pulsars in Fermi (formerly) Unassociated Sources

discovers a radio-quiet gamma-ray millisecond Journal Group

e-vlbi observations of the first gamma-ray nova V407 Cyg

The Characterization of the Gamma-Ray Excess from the Central Milky Way

Gamma Ray Physics in the Fermi era. F.Longo University of Trieste and INFN

SPATIAL UNIFORMITY OF THE GALACTIC GAMMA-RAY EXCESS. Manoj Kaplinghat, UC Irvine

Searching for Dark Matter in the Galactic Center with Fermi LAT: Challenges

Exploring Fermi-LAT Extended GeV Emission with Stacking Analysis

ACIS ( , ) Total e e e e-10 4.

What Can GLAST Say About the Origin of Cosmic Rays in Other Galaxies

Galactic sources in GeV/TeV Astronomy and the new HESS Results

First Year Fermi Gamma ray Space Telescope Observations of Centaurus A

EBL Studies with the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

NEUTRINOS ON ICE THE SEARCH FOR THE COSMIC-RAY SOURCES FE KRAUSS, J. WILMS, M. KADLER, M. KRETER

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 13 Jul 2016

The spectacular stellar explosion - GRB A: synchrotron modeling in the wind and the ISM

Transcription:

A New Gamma-Ray Source in the Vicinity of the Galactic Supernova Remnant G306.3 0.9 arxiv:1712.06415v1 [astro-ph.he] 18 Dec 2017 TUBITAK Space Technologies Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey E-mail: tulun.ergin@tubitak.gov.tr Satoru Katsuda, Saitama University, Saitama, Japan Aytap Sezer, Avrasya University, Trabzon, Turkey Ryo Yamazaki, Aoyama Gakuin University, Fuchinobe, Japan Miroslav Filipovic, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia Hidetoshi Sano, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan Yasuo Fukui, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan Shuta Tanaka, Konan University, Kobe, Japan A new extended gamma-ray source, which was named as Source A, in the southwest of Galactic supernova remnant (SNR) G306.3 0.9 was detected with a significance of 13σ at the location of R.A. (J2000) = 13 h 17 m 52 s.80, Decl. (J2000) = 63 55 48.00 using about 9 years of Fermi-LAT data. In order to investigate this unidentified gamma-ray source in multi-wavelengths, we performed Swift observations of Source A. In this presentation we summarize the published gamma-ray results, report about the recent ToO Swift observations of Source A, and show our preliminary results of the gamma-ray analysis that we conducted using the new X-ray data. 7th Fermi Symposium 2017 15-20 October 2017 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). https://pos.sissa.it/

1. Introduction In [3], we reported about the detection of an extended gamma-ray source, Source A, located 0.6 south-west of the supernova remnant (SNR) G306.3 0.9. Assuming Source A as a point-like gamma-ray source,we detected it with a significance of 9.7σ (TS 1 94). Its best-fitted location was found to be R.A. (J2000) = 13 h 17 m 52 s.80, Decl. (J2000) = 63 55 48.00. If the extended gamma-ray emission was fit to a disk-like extension model, the extension radius was measured to be 0.73 ± 0.07. As an extended source the total significance was found to be 13σ and assuming a power-law (PL) spectrum, we obtained Γ = 2.1 and the energy flux was found to be (2.07 ± 0.2) 10 5 MeV cm 2 s 1. In this paper we summarize the results of our Swift ToO observations on Source A in Section 2. Following the ToO observations, we extended the gamma-ray analysis by using 3 months of more Fermi-LAT data than what we used in our previous analysis [3]. In Section 3, we explain the gamma-ray analysis and give its preliminary results. In Section 4, we present the conclusions and give an outlook. 2. Swift ToO Observations & Results To unravel the nature of the extended unidentified Fermi gamma-ray source, Source A, found near the SNR G306.3 0.9 [3], two Swift ToOs (IDs: 00010121001, 00010151001, 00010151002) were successfully completed in May and June 2017. We had 5.6 ks effective exposure for the May observations and 5 ks for June observations. Four new X-ray sources were discovered, which we named as SrcA/Src1, SrcB/Src2, SrcC/Src3, and SrcD/Src4 in our initial analyses. The June ToO was centered at SrcB, because this was found to be the brightest X-ray source. Except SrcC, all Swift XRT sources are within the 5σ contour level of Source A. The locations of these X-ray sources are given in Table 1. The Swift XRT sources are about 10 away from each other. So, there is no physical connection between them, because the separation between them is too big for any distance that is >0.1 kpc. All Swift XRT sources, are close to or within the 5σ Table 1: X-ray point sources observed by Swift XRT in two ToO observations. Name RA (deg) Dec. (deg) Exposure (ks) SrcA/Src1 199.331-63.882 10.6 SrcB/Src2 199.742-63.954 10.6 SrcC/Src3 199.579-63.781 10.6 SrcD/Src4 198.964-63.905 10.6 contour level of Source A. Here are the details of the initial Swift analysis results and the multiwavelength aspects of each of these four X-ray sources: SrcA (Src1): This is the closest Swift XRT source to Source A. SrcA has an optical counterpart classified as a star in the Guide Star Catalog 2.3 2, which is 4 (S7KT124582) away from SrcA. Another close optical source (S7KT125052) is 6 away from SrcA. SrcA might be a binary system, because a separation of 6 amounts to 6000 AU at a distance of 1 kpc. SrcA has no radio counterparts. SrcB (Src2): Flux of SrcB changed by a factor of 4 within 3 weeks implying that this source is a variable. However, there are no observed optical or radio counterparts for this source. 1 Test Statistics (TS) values indicate that the null hypothesis (maximum likelihood value for a model without an additional source) is incorrect. The square-root of TS gives the detection significance of a source. 2 http://gsss.stsci.edu/catalogs/gsc/gsc2/gsc2.htm 1

SrcC (Src3): This source has a very soft spectrum and since its position is outside the 5σ gamma-ray contours of Source A, we assume that this source is not directly related to Source A. SrcD (Src4): This source was found to exist in the Swift XRT data, while searching for radio counterparts for SrcA, SrcB, and SrcC in the Sydney University Molonglo Sky Survey (SUMSS) data. We found a SUMSS radio counterpart for SrcD at 843 MHz that also overlaps with PMN J1315-6354 (R.A. (J2000) = 13 h 15 m 52 s.9, Decl. (J2000) = 63 54 40 ) from the Parkes-MIT-NRAO (PMN) 4.85GHz Surveys catalog [4]. X-ray spectra for all Swift XRT sources are shown in Figure 2. For SrcA, SrcB, and SrcD we assumed the absorbing Hydrogen column density to be 1.7 10 22 cm 2, which is the same as that for G306.3 0.9, to calculate the absorption corrected flux in the 0.5-10 kev energy range. Hydrogen column density for SrcC was assumed to be zero to adequately fit its very soft X-ray spectrum. The absorption corrected flux value for SrcA, SrcB, SrcC, and SrcD is calculated to be 3.2 10 11, 4.5 10 13, 2.5 10 15, 3.3 10 13 ergs cm 2 s 1, respectively. Since SrcB is the brightest X-ray source among all four detected Swift XRT sources, we calculated the luminosity of SrcB to be 6 10 31 erg s 1 at a distance of 1 kpc. We checked the 3rd Fermi-LAT source catalog (3FGL) [1] and the 3rd catalog of hard Fermi-LAT sources (3FHL) [2] to find possible counterparts for Source A and the associated X- ray sources. In Figure 1 Swift X-ray sources are shown with black markers. Fermi-LAT sources from the 3rd Fermi-LAT source catalog are shown in red markers. Sources from the 3FHL catalog are shown in cyan markers. The extended 3FGL source (3FGL J1303.0-6312e) was also reported in the 3FHL catalog and its extension is shown as a blue circle. The green contours are for the gamma-ray TS values (25, 36, 49). We could not find any counterparts for Figure 1: The gamma-ray TS map of Source A, which is not included in the background model. Source A in 3FGL and 3FHL catalogs. The white dashed circle shows the radio source PMN J1315-6354. 3. Analysis & Results of Gamma-ray Data After discovering the X-ray sources within Source A, we re-analyzed the gamma-ray data. We used data between 2008-08-04 and 2017-06-30. We analyzed events within the energy range of 200 MeV - 300 GeV using the Fermi analysis toolkit fermipy 3. We selected Fermi-LAT Pass 8 Source class and front+back type events, which come from zenith angles smaller than 90 and from within a circular region of interest (ROI) with a radius of 20 centered at the bestfit position of Source A. The maximum likelihood fitting method was employed on the spatially and spectrally binned data and used the instrument function P8R2 SOURCE V6. The gammaray background model contains Galactic diffuse sources (gll iem v6.fits) and isotropic sources 3 http://fermipy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html 2

Figure 2: Swift XRT spectra of SrcA (upper-left panel), SrcB (upper-right panel), SrcC (lower-left panel), and SrcD (lower-right panel). The photon indices are allowed to vary freely and they are found to be 8.6 for SrcA, 1.7 for SrcB, 5.9 for SrcC, 2.8 for SrcD. Table 2: The maximum likelihood analysis results for different combinations of Swift XRT sources and G306.3 0.9 that are included in the gamma-ray background model. Included Source Names TS (SrcA) TS (SrcB) TS (SrcD) TS (G306.3 0.9) G306.3 0.9 - - - 55.48 SrcA & G306.3 0.9 128.92 - - 14.42 SrcB & G306.3 0.9-139.10-6.14 SrcD & G306.3 0.9 - - 111.89 27.50 SrcA & SrcD & G306.3 0.9 89.29-24.26 6.08 SrcA & SrcB & G306.3 0.9 42.57 46.86-8.15 SrcB & SrcD & G306.3 0.9-74.09 50.59 9.13 SrcA & SrcB & SrcD & G306.3 0.9 2.52 90.81 43.27 3.73 (iso P8R2 SOURCE V6 v06.txt). It also includes all point-like and extended sources from the 3rd Fermi-LAT Source Catalog located within a 15 15 region centered at the ROI center. Freed normalization parameters of sources that are within 3 of ROI center. Freed all parameters of the diffuse Galactic emission and the isotropic component. All sources with TS > 10 are set free and all sources with TS < 10 are fixed. The analysis region shown by the 10 10 TS map covers a very large area in the sky and Source A seems to show some sub-structures, but the X-ray sources concentrated around the best-fitted location of Source A. In order to clarify how much each X-ray source is contributing to Source A s total gamma-ray emission, we added each of the X-ray sources one by one as a point-like source into the gamma-ray background model. Then we checked for the significances and produced a TS map for every version of the gamma-ray background model. Since SrcC is located out of the 5σ contours of Source A, we assumed that it is not a part of Source A. Thus, we excluded SrcC from the gamma-ray analysis. We found out that the included source combination of SrcB & SrcD & G306.3 0.9 cleans all excess gamma-ray emission from 3

Figure 3: The TS map for two different background gamma-ray models. Left Panel: Including SrcA, SrcB, SrcD, and G306.3 0.9 in the background model. Right Panel: Including SrcB, SrcD, and G306.3 0.9 in the background model. On both panels, the magenta significance contours of 5, 6, and 7σ are taken from Figure 1. All sources added to the background model are shown with yellow crosses. Green contours represent the 5σ significance level obtained after the background model is fit to the data. the nearby region of the best-fitted position of Source A. Although including SrcA & SrcB & SrcD & G306.3 0.9 source combination also gives comparable results to the SrcB & SrcD & G306.3 0.9 combination, the TS value of SrcA comes out as 2.52 in the former analysis. The TS map with SrcA, SrcB, SrcD, and G306.3 0.9 included in the gamma-ray background model is shown in Figure 3 left panel and the same figure right panel shows the TS map for only including SrcB, SrcD, and G306.3 0.9 in the gamma-ray background model. A PL spectral fit to the spectra of SrcB and SrcD gives a spectral index of 2.47 ± 0.12 and 2.35 ± 0.14, respectively, and a total energy flux of (5.9 ± 1.1) 10 6 MeV cm 2 s 1 and (4.6 ± 1.0) 10 6 MeV cm 2 s 1, respectively. The spectra of SrcB and Src D are shown in Figure 4. To see the long term variability Figure 4: The SED of SrcB (left panel) and SrcD (right panel) assuming a PL-type spectrum in the energy range of 0.2 300 GeV for both sources. The central solid black line and grey band represent the best-fitted PL model and its statistical errors. in the light curve of SrcB and SrcD, we apply Fermi-LAT aperture photometry taking data from the circular region of 1 around the best-fitting position of SrcB and SrcD. For each source we applied the barycenter correction to the data. We also applied event weighing to keep only events with a probability of > 10% of being from SrcB/SrcD. Higher probability values decreases the number of events abruptly. The 1-month-binned light curves of SrcB and SrcD assuming a PL-type spectrum in the energy range of 0.2-300 GeV are shown on the left and right panels of Figure 5. 4

Figure 5: The 1-month-binned gamma-ray light curve of SrcB (left panel) and SrcD (right panel) assuming a PL-type spectrum in the energy range of 0.2 300 GeV for both sources. The blue line shows the mean value. The dashed magenta and solid red line represents the 1σ and 3σ significance levels, respectively. 4. Conclusions & Outlook We analyzed the GeV gamma-ray data including the recently detected Swift XRT sources and the SNR G306.3 0.9 in the gamma-ray background as point-source source templates. Comparing the analysis results for the case where SrcA & SrcB & SrcD & G306.3 0.9 source combination was part of the background model with the ones for SrcB & SrcD & G306.3 0.9 source combination inside the background model, we found comparable results. However, by looking at the excess in the TA maps, SrcB & SrcD & G306.3 0.9 source combination is favored. Possible source-type scenarios for SrcA, SrcB, SrcD are listed as follows: SrcA has an optical counterpart, which is a star. It could be a gamma-ray binary, and if so, its variability has to be observed in various wavelengths. However, it is not detected in gamma rays (TS=2.52). SrcB is the brightest X-ray source among all Swift XRT sources. It has no optical and radio counterpart, but was detected in gamma rays with a significance of 9σ. This source is possibly a quasar with a very weak radio emission, but probably the SUMSS sensitivity limit is insufficient for the detection of SrcB. Optical and radio observations are needed to confirm this estimate. SrcD has a radio counterpart found in SUMSS. It was detected in gamma rays with a significance of 7σ. It may be a blazar candidate, but more observations are needed to show the variability in different wave-bands. As a next step, we plan for multi-waveband observations (radio, optical, and X-rays) on SrcB and SrcD. In addition, we will re-analyze the gamma-ray data to do more variability checks and investigate the energy-dependent source morphology. References [1] Acero, F., et al. (Fermi Collaboration), Fermi Large Area Telescope Third Source Catalog, AJSS, 218, 41 (2015) [2] Acero F. et al. (Fermi Collaboration), 3FHL: The Third Catalog of Hard Fermi-LAT Sources, AJSS, 232, 23 (2017) [3] Sezer, A,. Ergin, T., &Yamzaki, R., Suzaku analysis of the supernova remnant G306.3 0.9 and the gamma-ray view of its neighbourhood, MNRAS, 466, 3434 (2017) [4] Wright A.E., Griffith M.R., Burke B.F., & Ekers R.D., The Parkes-MIT-NRAO (PMN) Surveys: II. Source catalog for the Southern Survey (-87.5 < δ < -37 ), AJSS, 91, 111 (1994) 5