Geometry and the Dirichlet Problem in Any Co-dimension

Similar documents
Harmonic measure for sets of higher co-dimensions and BMO solvability

On quantitative absolute continuity of harmonic measure and big

Potential Analysis meets Geometric Measure Theory

The Gauss-Green Formula (And Elliptic Boundary Problems On Rough Domains) Joint Work with Steve Hofmann and Marius Mitrea

The Dirichlet boundary problems for second order parabolic operators satisfying a Carleson condition

A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DIRICHLET AND REGULARITY PROBLEMS FOR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS. Zhongwei Shen

BMO solvability and the A condition for elliptic operators

Quasispheres and Bi-Lipschitz Parameterization

Analysis and geometry on non-smooth domains

THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH BM O BOUNDARY DATA AND ALMOST-REAL COEFFICIENTS

Besov regularity of solutions of the p-laplace equation

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Spring 2018 Professor: Jared Speck

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck

UNIFORM RECTIFIABILITY AND HARMONIC MEASURE III: RIESZ TRANSFORM BOUNDS IMPLY UNIFORM RECTIFIABILITY OF BOUNDARIES OF 1-SIDED NTA DOMAINS.

UNIFORM RECTIFIABILITY AND HARMONIC MEASURE II: POISSON KERNELS IN L p IMPLY UNIFORM RECTIFIABILITY. Contents

Harmonic Functions and Brownian motion

arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 27 Aug 2018

Structure theorems for Radon measures

Cones of measures. Tatiana Toro. University of Washington. Quantitative and Computational Aspects of Metric Geometry

MATH 425, FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS

TUG OF WAR INFINITY LAPLACIAN

arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 1 Jul 2016

Class Meeting # 9: Poisson s Formula, Harnack s Inequality, and Liouville s Theorem

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO FREE BOUNDARY PROBLEMS FOR HARMONIC AND CALORIC MEASURE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO

TWO SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR RECTIFIABLE MEASURES

TWO SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR RECTIFIABLE MEASURES

RECTIFIABILITY OF HARMONIC MEASURE

On the definition and properties of p-harmonious functions

Introduction to Random Diffusions

Class Meeting # 9: Poisson s Formula, Harnack s Inequality, and Liouville s Theorem

ON THE REGULARITY OF SAMPLE PATHS OF SUB-ELLIPTIC DIFFUSIONS ON MANIFOLDS

R. M. Brown. 29 March 2008 / Regional AMS meeting in Baton Rouge. Department of Mathematics University of Kentucky. The mixed problem.

A NEW CHARACTERIZATION OF CHORD-ARC DOMAINS

BMO solvability and the A condition for elliptic operators

ELECTROMAGNETIC SCATTERING FROM PERTURBED SURFACES. Katharine Ott Advisor: Irina Mitrea Department of Mathematics University of Virginia

Singular Integrals and Elliptic Boundary Problems on Regular Semmes Kenig Toro Domains

UNIFORM RECTIFIABILITY AND HARMONIC MEASURE II: POISSON KERNELS IN L p IMPLY UNIFORM RECTIFIABILITY

Boundary value problems for the infinity Laplacian. regularity and geometric results

Open Problems about Curves, Sets, and Measures

Perron method for the Dirichlet problem.

A NEW APPROACH TO ABSOLUTE CONTINUITY OF ELLIPTIC MEASURE, WITH APPLICATIONS TO NON-SYMMETRIC EQUATIONS

In this chapter we study elliptical PDEs. That is, PDEs of the form. 2 u = lots,

NONLOCALITY AND STOCHASTICITY TWO EMERGENT DIRECTIONS FOR APPLIED MATHEMATICS. Max Gunzburger

Course Description for Real Analysis, Math 156

4.10 Dirichlet problem in the circle and the Poisson kernel

Divergence form operators in Reifenberg flat domains.

Partial Differential Equations and Random Walks

The Mixed Boundary Value Problem in Lipschitz Domains

Nonlinear aspects of Calderón-Zygmund theory

General Technical Remarks on PDE s and Boundary Conditions Kurt Bryan MA 436

The Dirichlet boundary problems for second order parabolic operators satisfying a Carleson condition

The L p Dirichlet problem for second order elliptic operators and a p-adapted square function

where is the Laplace operator and is a scalar function.

Harmonic Functions and Brownian Motion in Several Dimensions

Lecture 7. 1 Notations. Tel Aviv University Spring 2011

Published online: 29 Aug 2007.

1. Introduction, notation, and main results

THE MIXED PROBLEM IN LIPSCHITZ DOMAINS WITH GENERAL DECOMPOSITIONS OF THE BOUNDARY

COMMENTARY ON TWO PAPERS OF A. P. CALDERÓN

SOLUTION OF POISSON S EQUATION. Contents

Lecture Introduction

Schedule for workshop on Analysis and Boundary Value Problems on Real and Complex Domains BIRS, July 2010

THE GREEN FUNCTION. Contents

Double Layer Potentials on Polygons and Pseudodifferential Operators on Lie Groupoids

Integro-differential equations: Regularity theory and Pohozaev identities

Applications of the periodic unfolding method to multi-scale problems

Boundary regularity of solutions of degenerate elliptic equations without boundary conditions

A FREE BOUNDARY PROBLEM FOR THE PARABOLIC POISSON KERNEL

Table of Contents. II. PDE classification II.1. Motivation and Examples. II.2. Classification. II.3. Well-posedness according to Hadamard

WEYL S LEMMA, ONE OF MANY. Daniel W. Stroock

Class Meeting # 2: The Diffusion (aka Heat) Equation

= 2 x x 2 n It was introduced by P.-S.Laplace in a 1784 paper in connection with gravitational

Set-Theoretic Geometry

i=1 α i. Given an m-times continuously

Partial Differential Equations

Green s Functions and Distributions

INTRODUCTION TO PDEs

and finally, any second order divergence form elliptic operator

The oblique derivative problem for general elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains

u xx + u yy = 0. (5.1)

Regularity Theory. Lihe Wang

SOLVING AND COMPUTING THE DISCRETE DIRICHLET PROBLEM

A characterization of the two weight norm inequality for the Hilbert transform

Short note on compact operators - Monday 24 th March, Sylvester Eriksson-Bique

Degenerate harmonic structures on fractal graphs.

AN INTRODUCTION TO VARIFOLDS DANIEL WESER. These notes are from a talk given in the Junior Analysis seminar at UT Austin on April 27th, 2018.

arxiv: v4 [math.ca] 13 Dec 2016

Isogeometric Analysis for the Fractional Laplacian

Boot camp - Problem set

In other words, we are interested in what is happening to the y values as we get really large x values and as we get really small x values.

A class of domains with fractal boundaries: Functions spaces and numerical methods

McGill University Department of Mathematics and Statistics. Ph.D. preliminary examination, PART A. PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS Paper BETA

Partial regularity for fully nonlinear PDE

Schrodinger operator: optimal decay of fundamental solutions and boundary value problems

We are going to discuss what it means for a sequence to converge in three stages: First, we define what it means for a sequence to converge to zero

Decoupling course outline Decoupling theory is a recent development in Fourier analysis with applications in partial differential equations and

BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS ON A HALF SIERPINSKI GASKET

2 A brief interruption to discuss boundary value/intial value problems

Transcription:

Geometry and the Dirichlet Problem in Any Co-dimension Max Engelstein (joint work with G. David (U. Paris Sud) and S. Mayboroda (U. Minn.)) Massachusetts Institute of Technology January 10, 2019 This research was partially supported by an NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, DMS 1703306 and David Jerison s NSF DMS 1500771. 1

Overview Harmonic Measure: where does a random walk first exit a domain? 2

Overview Harmonic Measure: where does a random walk first exit a domain? Figure: A random walk exiting a domain (figure credit Matthew Badger) 2

Overview Harmonic Measure: where does a random walk first exit a domain? Figure: A random walk exiting a domain (figure credit Matthew Badger) Dirichlet problem: equilibrium after diffusion. 2

Overview Harmonic Measure: where does a random walk first exit a domain? Figure: A random walk exiting a domain (figure credit Matthew Badger) Dirichlet problem: equilibrium after diffusion. Not surprising: a nasty domain can have hidden parts of the boundary 2

Overview Harmonic Measure: where does a random walk first exit a domain? Figure: A random walk exiting a domain (figure credit Matthew Badger) Dirichlet problem: equilibrium after diffusion. Not surprising: a nasty domain can have hidden parts of the boundary Surprising: if nothing is hidden, the domain is nice. 2

Overview Harmonic Measure: where does a random walk first exit a domain? Figure: A random walk exiting a domain (figure credit Matthew Badger) Dirichlet problem: equilibrium after diffusion. Not surprising: a nasty domain can have hidden parts of the boundary Surprising: if nothing is hidden, the domain is nice. Very surprising (and recent): higher co-dimension analogues. 2

Random Walk and Hitting Measure Walker goes to each neighbor with equal probability. Figure: Each neighbor has probability 1/4 3

Random Walk and Hitting Measure Walker goes to each neighbor with equal probability. Figure: We keep going until we hit the boundary 3

Random Walk and Hitting Measure Walker goes to each neighbor with equal probability. Figure: Backtracking is allowed 3

Random Walk and Hitting Measure Walker goes to each neighbor with equal probability. Figure: Stop when we hit the boundary 3

Random Walk and Hitting Measure Walker goes to each neighbor with equal probability. Figure: Stop when we hit the boundary 3

Random Walk and Hitting Measure Walker goes to each neighbor with equal probability. Hitting Measure: probability RW hits that part of the boundary. Figure: Hitting Measure of Green starting at Red ω Pole (Target) 3

Random Walk and Hitting Measure Walker goes to each neighbor with equal probability. Hitting Measure: probability RW hits that part of the boundary. Figure: Hitting Measure Depends on the Pole! 3

Random Walk and Hitting Measure Walker goes to each neighbor with equal probability. Hitting Measure: probability RW hits that part of the boundary. Figure: Hitting Measure Depends on the Pole! Hard to compute!!! (Solve 10 eqns with 10 unknowns) Average of neighbors! 3

Discrete Harmonic Functions Mean Value Property u(point) = 1 #Neighbors Neighbors u(neighbor). 4

Discrete Harmonic Functions Mean Value Property Example: u(point) = 1 #Neighbors Neighbors u(neighbor). Figure: Each red value is the average of the neighboring values 4

Discrete Harmonic Functions Mean Value Property Example: u(point) = 1 #Neighbors Neighbors u(neighbor). Figure: Each red value is the average of the neighboring values Uniqueness: Maximum principle! 4

Expectation and the Dirichlet Problem Recall: u(point) = 1 #Neighbors Neighbors u(neighbor). Figure: How do we fill in the boundary? 5

Expectation and the Dirichlet Problem Recall: u(point) = 1 #Neighbors Neighbors u(neighbor). This is the Dirichlet problem. Figure: How do we fill in the boundary? 5

Expectation and the Dirichlet Problem Recall: u(point) = 1 #Neighbors Neighbors u(neighbor). Figure: How do we fill in the boundary? This is the Dirichlet problem. u(point) = u(boundarypoint)ω Point (BoundaryPoint). BoundaryPoints 5

Expectation and the Dirichlet Problem Recall: u(point) = 1 #Neighbors Neighbors u(neighbor). This is the Dirichlet problem. Figure: How do we fill in the boundary? u(point) = u(boundarypoint)ω Point (BoundaryPoint). Expected value! BoundaryPoints 5

Harmonic Functions in the Continuum Mean Value Property: for all X R n and R > 0, ˆ 1 u(y )dy = u(x ). B(X, R) B(X,R) 6

Harmonic Functions in the Continuum Mean Value Property: for all X R n and R > 0, ˆ 1 u(y )dy = u(x ). B(X, R) B(X,R) u satisfies mean value property u = 0 n i=1 2 x i x i u = 0. 6

Harmonic Functions in the Continuum Mean Value Property: for all X R n and R > 0, ˆ 1 u(y )dy = u(x ). B(X, R) B(X,R) u satisfies mean value property u = 0 n i=1 2 x i x i u = 0. EX : u(x, y) x 2 y 2 Figure: Harmonic functions don t have local extrema credit: laussy.org 6

Harmonic Functions in the Continuum Mean Value Property: for all X R n and R > 0, ˆ 1 u(y )dy = u(x ). B(X, R) B(X,R) u satisfies mean value property u = 0 n i=1 2 x i x i u = 0. EX : u(x, y) x 2 y 2 Figure: Harmonic functions don t have local extrema credit: laussy.org Represents Equilibrium after diffusion. 6

Harmonic Measure in the Continuum X Ω R n. E Ω. ω X (E) = Probability a B.M. exits Ω first in E. 7

Harmonic Measure in the Continuum X Ω R n. E Ω. ω X (E) = Probability a B.M. exits Ω first in E. (D) = { uf =0 x Ω u f (Q) =f (Q) Q Ω Figure: Brownian Motion exiting a domain (figure credit Matthew Badger) 7

Harmonic Measure in the Continuum X Ω R n. E Ω. ω X (E) = Probability a B.M. exits Ω first in E. { uf =0 x Ω (D) = u f (Q) =f (Q) Q Ω ˆ u f (X ) = fdω X. Ω Figure: Brownian Motion exiting a domain (figure credit Matthew Badger) 7

Harmonic Measure in the Continuum X Ω R n. E Ω. ω X (E) = Probability a B.M. exits Ω first in E. (D) = { uf =0 x Ω u f (Q) =f (Q) Q Ω Figure: Brownian Motion exiting a domain (figure credit Matthew Badger) ˆ u f (X ) = Ω fdω X. What is the temperature in the interior, given the temperature on the edge? 7

When does ω X not see large sets? Bad geometry: ω doesn t see sets of large length. 8

When does ω X not see large sets? Bad geometry: ω doesn t see sets of large length. Connectivity. Figure: ω Pole cannot see the other component 8

When does ω X not see large sets? Bad geometry: ω doesn t see sets of large length. Connectivity. Figure: Brownian motion cannot go down hallways 8

When does ω X not see large sets? Bad geometry: ω doesn t see sets of large length. Connectivity. Cusps Figure: Brownian motion cannot go down hallways Figure: Brownian motion cannot get to the cusp 8

So what if ω X doesn t see large sets? (Quantitative) Well posedness of Dirichlet problem: { uf =0 x Ω (D) = u f (Q) =f (Q) Q Ω 9

So what if ω X doesn t see large sets? (Quantitative) Well posedness of Dirichlet problem: { uf =0 x Ω (D) = u f (Q) =f (Q) Q Ω ω X = k X dσ (σ is length on Ω). 9

So what if ω X doesn t see large sets? (Quantitative) Well posedness of Dirichlet problem: { uf =0 x Ω (D) = u f (Q) =f (Q) Q Ω ω X = k X dσ (σ is length on Ω). k X small: big f can give small u. Vice versa if k X big. 9

So what if ω X doesn t see large sets? (Quantitative) Well posedness of Dirichlet problem: { uf =0 x Ω (D) = u f (Q) =f (Q) Q Ω ω X = k X dσ (σ is length on Ω). k X small: big f can give small u. Vice versa if k X big. Figure: Changing data on the cusp doesn t change the solution 9

So what if ω X doesn t see large sets? (Quantitative) Well posedness of Dirichlet problem: { uf =0 x Ω (D) = u f (Q) =f (Q) Q Ω ω X = k X dσ (σ is length on Ω). k X small: big f can give small u. Vice versa if k X big. Figure: Changing data on the cusp doesn t change the solution Theorem : D is (quantitatively) well posed iff k X is not too large or too small too often. 9

So what if ω X doesn t see large sets? (Quantitative) Well posedness of Dirichlet problem: { uf =0 x Ω (D) = u f (Q) =f (Q) Q Ω ω X = k X dσ (σ is length on Ω). k X small: big f can give small u. Vice versa if k X big. Figure: Changing data on the cusp doesn t change the solution Theorem : D is (quantitatively) well posed iff k X is not too large or too small too often. Call this A 9

Three Examples: ω vs Length σ is the length measure. 10

Three Examples: ω vs Length σ is the length measure. A disk, Lipschitz domain and Snowflake (figure from Matthew Badger) 10

Three Examples: ω vs Length σ is the length measure. For the disk, ω 0 = A disk, Lipschitz domain and Snowflake (figure from Matthew Badger) σ 2πr. 10

Three Examples: ω vs Length σ is the length measure. For the disk, ω 0 = A disk, Lipschitz domain and Snowflake (figure from Matthew Badger) σ 2πr. For a Lipschitz domain, if ω 0 (E) = kσ and k is not too small or too big too often. 10

Three Examples: ω vs Length σ is the length measure. A disk, Lipschitz domain and Snowflake (figure from Matthew Badger) For the disk, ω 0 = σ 2πr. For a Lipschitz domain, if ω 0 (E) = kσ and k is not too small or too big too often. For the snowflake ω 0 = kσ and k = + or 0 at every point. 10

Relationship between Geometry and H.M. Long Corridors, Cusps are problems. 11

Relationship between Geometry and H.M. Long Corridors, Cusps are problems. They aren t the only problem! Fractals! Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω X = k X dσ for nice k X? 11

Relationship between Geometry and H.M. Long Corridors, Cusps are problems. They aren t the only problem! Fractals! Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω X = k X dσ for nice k X? Q2 (free boundary): If ω X = k X dσ for nice k X, does that mean Ω must be nice? 11

Relationship between Geometry and H.M. Long Corridors, Cusps are problems. They aren t the only problem! Fractals! Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω X = k X dσ for nice k X? Q2 (free boundary): If ω X = k X dσ for nice k X, does that mean Ω must be nice? Lots of work: Ahlfors, Bishop, Carleson, David, E., Fabes, Garnett, Hofmann, Jerison, Kenig, Laurentiev, Mayboroda, Nyström, Øksendal, Pipher, Riesz (x2), Salsa, Toro, Uriarte-Tuero, Volberg, Wolff, Zhao...Many More. 11

Relationship between Geometry and H.M. Long Corridors, Cusps are problems. They aren t the only problem! Fractals! Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω X = k X dσ for nice k X? Q2 (free boundary): If ω X = k X dσ for nice k X, does that mean Ω must be nice? Lots of work: Ahlfors, Bishop, Carleson, David, E., Fabes, Garnett, Hofmann, Jerison, Kenig, Laurentiev, Mayboroda, Nyström, Øksendal, Pipher, Riesz (x2), Salsa, Toro, Uriarte-Tuero, Volberg, Wolff, Zhao...Many More. When n = 2: connections to the complex analysis. 11

Green Function Associated with Harmonic measure ω X is Green function G(X, ). 12

Green Function Associated with Harmonic measure ω X is Green function G(X, ). G(X, Y ) >0 X Y Ω G(X, Q) =0 Q Ω Y G(X, Y ) =δ X (Y ) Y Ω. Figure: George Green (figure credit wikipedia) 12

Green Function Associated with Harmonic measure ω X is Green function G(X, ). G(X, Y ) >0 X Y Ω G(X, Q) =0 Q Ω Y G(X, Y ) =δ X (Y ) Y Ω. ˆ Ω ˆ ϕ(y )G(X, Y )dy = ϕ(y ) + ϕ(q)dω X (Q). Ω Figure: George Green (figure credit wikipedia) 12

Green Function Associated with Harmonic measure ω X is Green function G(X, ). G(X, Y ) >0 X Y Ω G(X, Q) =0 Q Ω Y G(X, Y ) =δ X (Y ) Y Ω. Figure: George Green (figure credit wikipedia) ˆ Ω ˆ ϕ(y )G(X, Y )dy = ϕ(y ) + ϕ(q)dω X (Q). Ω Probability: G(X, Y ) = how likely does B.M. go from X to Y without leaving Ω (tricky!) 12

Green Function Associated with Harmonic measure ω X is Green function G(X, ). G(X, Y ) >0 X Y Ω G(X, Q) =0 Q Ω Y G(X, Y ) =δ X (Y ) Y Ω. Figure: George Green (figure credit wikipedia) ˆ Ω ˆ ϕ(y )G(X, Y )dy = ϕ(y ) + ϕ(q)dω X (Q). Ω Probability: G(X, Y ) = how likely does B.M. go from X to Y without leaving Ω (tricky!) Really hard to compute! Known only for a few domains (half plane, disc, polygons...) 12

Poisson Kernel dω X (Q) = k X (Q)dσ(Q). 13

Poisson Kernel dω X (Q) = k X (Q)dσ(Q). k X is Poisson kernel. 13

Poisson Kernel dω X (Q) = k X (Q)dσ(Q). k X is Poisson kernel. Figure: Siméon Denis Poisson (figure credit wikipedia) 13

Poisson Kernel dω X (Q) = k X (Q)dσ(Q). k X is Poisson kernel. Figure: Siméon Denis Poisson (figure credit wikipedia) k X = n G(X, ). 13

Poisson Kernel dω X (Q) = k X (Q)dσ(Q). k X is Poisson kernel. Figure: Siméon Denis Poisson (figure credit wikipedia) k X = n G(X, ). Green function hard to compute Poisson kernel hard to compute. 13

Poisson Kernel dω X (Q) = k X (Q)dσ(Q). k X is Poisson kernel. Figure: Siméon Denis Poisson (figure credit wikipedia) k X = n G(X, ). Green function hard to compute Poisson kernel hard to compute. Q2 Above: If k X is nice does that mean Ω must be nice? 13

Poisson Kernel dω X (Q) = k X (Q)dσ(Q). k X is Poisson kernel. Figure: Siméon Denis Poisson (figure credit wikipedia) k X = n G(X, ). Green function hard to compute Poisson kernel hard to compute. Q2 Above: If k X is nice does that mean Ω must be nice? Overdetermined: k X Neumann conditions, Q Ω G(X, Q) = 0, Dirichlet conditions. 13

Poisson Kernel dω X (Q) = k X (Q)dσ(Q). k X is Poisson kernel. Figure: Siméon Denis Poisson (figure credit wikipedia) k X = n G(X, ). Green function hard to compute Poisson kernel hard to compute. Q2 Above: If k X is nice does that mean Ω must be nice? Overdetermined: k X Neumann conditions, Q Ω G(X, Q) = 0, Dirichlet conditions. Free Boundary Problem! 13

Back to the Questions Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω = kdσ for nice k? Q2 (free boundary): If ω = kdσ for nice k, does that mean Ω is nice? 14

Back to the Questions Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω = kdσ for nice k? Q2 (free boundary): If ω = kdσ for nice k, does that mean Ω is nice? Yes! For essentially every value of nice! 14

Back to the Questions Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω = kdσ for nice k? Q2 (free boundary): If ω = kdσ for nice k, does that mean Ω is nice? Yes! For essentially every value of nice! Exercise: k = constant iff Ω = B(X, R). 14

Back to the Questions Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω = kdσ for nice k? Q2 (free boundary): If ω = kdσ for nice k, does that mean Ω is nice? Yes! For essentially every value of nice! Exercise: k = constant iff Ω = B(X, R). Harder: k C k,α iff Ω C k+1,α (need α (0, 1), Jerison-Kenig!) 14

Back to the Questions Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω = kdσ for nice k? Q2 (free boundary): If ω = kdσ for nice k, does that mean Ω is nice? Yes! For essentially every value of nice! Exercise: k = constant iff Ω = B(X, R). Harder: k C k,α iff Ω C k+1,α (need α (0, 1), Jerison-Kenig!) Kenig-Toro 90s, 00s: osc k controls osc Ω. Vice Versa! 14

Back to the Questions Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω = kdσ for nice k? Q2 (free boundary): If ω = kdσ for nice k, does that mean Ω is nice? Yes! For essentially every value of nice! Exercise: k = constant iff Ω = B(X, R). Harder: k C k,α iff Ω C k+1,α (need α (0, 1), Jerison-Kenig!) Kenig-Toro 90s, 00s: osc k controls osc Ω. Vice Versa! Hofmann-Martell & Azzam-Mourgoglou-Tolsa 2018: k isn t too small or too big too often (A -condition) iff Ω looks flat at most points and scales (uniformly rectifiable). 14

Back to the Questions Q1 (direct): If Ω is nice does that mean ω = kdσ for nice k? Q2 (free boundary): If ω = kdσ for nice k, does that mean Ω is nice? Yes! For essentially every value of nice! Exercise: k = constant iff Ω = B(X, R). Harder: k C k,α iff Ω C k+1,α (need α (0, 1), Jerison-Kenig!) Kenig-Toro 90s, 00s: osc k controls osc Ω. Vice Versa! Hofmann-Martell & Azzam-Mourgoglou-Tolsa 2018: k isn t too small or too big too often (A -condition) iff Ω looks flat at most points and scales (uniformly rectifiable). Takeaway: Geometry of a set is characterized by solutions of Laplacian in complement of the set! 14

Digression on Dimension Famous Open Q: What is the (maximal) dimension of the support of ω? 15

Digression on Dimension Famous Open Q: What is the (maximal) dimension of the support of ω? Figure: Can harmonic measure live on the whole boundary? (figure credit wikipedia) 15

Digression on Dimension Famous Open Q: What is the (maximal) dimension of the support of ω? Figure: Can harmonic measure live on the whole boundary? (figure credit wikipedia) Makarov 85 Jones-Wolff 88: in n = 2, dim ω = 1. 15

Digression on Dimension Famous Open Q: What is the (maximal) dimension of the support of ω? Figure: Can harmonic measure live on the whole boundary? (figure credit wikipedia) Makarov 85 Jones-Wolff 88: in n = 2, dim ω = 1. Bourgain 87: in R n, dim ω < n. 15

Digression on Dimension Famous Open Q: What is the (maximal) dimension of the support of ω? Figure: Can harmonic measure live on the whole boundary? (figure credit wikipedia) Makarov 85 Jones-Wolff 88: in n = 2, dim ω = 1. Bourgain 87: in R n, dim ω < n. Wolff 95: in R n, n 3 dim ω > n 1, 15

Digression on Dimension Famous Open Q: What is the (maximal) dimension of the support of ω? Figure: Can harmonic measure live on the whole boundary? (figure credit wikipedia) Makarov 85 Jones-Wolff 88: in n = 2, dim ω = 1. Bourgain 87: in R n, dim ω < n. Wolff 95: in R n, n 3 dim ω > n 1, Precise value completely open! 15

Higher Co-dimension Would like to characterize geometry of higher-co-dimension sets! 16

Higher Co-dimension Would like to characterize geometry of higher-co-dimension sets! Think: curve in R 3. 16

Higher Co-dimension Would like to characterize geometry of higher-co-dimension sets! Think: curve in R 3. More exotic: snowflake in R 3! 16

Higher Co-dimension Would like to characterize geometry of higher-co-dimension sets! Think: curve in R 3. More exotic: snowflake in R 3! Problem: Elliptic PDE don t see sets of co-dim > 2! (removable!) 16

Higher Co-dimension Would like to characterize geometry of higher-co-dimension sets! Think: curve in R 3. More exotic: snowflake in R 3! Problem: Elliptic PDE don t see sets of co-dim > 2! (removable!) Why do this? It is fun! 16

Higher Co-dimension Would like to characterize geometry of higher-co-dimension sets! Think: curve in R 3. More exotic: snowflake in R 3! Problem: Elliptic PDE don t see sets of co-dim > 2! (removable!) Why do this? It is fun! Applications to Biology? Figure: DNA Straightens and Curls up to Attract/Avoid Enzymes 16

Degenerate Elliptic PDE Need degenerate elliptic PDE. 17

Degenerate Elliptic PDE Need degenerate elliptic PDE. Degenerate coefficients attract Brownian motion. 17

Degenerate Elliptic PDE Need degenerate elliptic PDE. Degenerate coefficients attract Brownian motion. E = (x, φ(x)) R n. φ : R d R n d. 17

Degenerate Elliptic PDE Need degenerate elliptic PDE. Degenerate coefficients attract Brownian motion. E = (x, φ(x)) R n. φ : R d R n d. David-Feneuil-Mayboroda: solutions to ( ) A(x) Lu = div u = 0, dist(x, E) n d 1 see the set E (A an elliptic matrix). 17

Degenerate Elliptic PDE Need degenerate elliptic PDE. Degenerate coefficients attract Brownian motion. E = (x, φ(x)) R n. φ : R d R n d. David-Feneuil-Mayboroda: solutions to ( ) A(x) Lu = div u = 0, dist(x, E) n d 1 see the set E (A an elliptic matrix) Red: Eau de Toilette: attracts the Brownian motion towards E. 17

Degenerate Elliptic PDE Need degenerate elliptic PDE. Degenerate coefficients attract Brownian motion. E = (x, φ(x)) R n. φ : R d R n d. David-Feneuil-Mayboroda: solutions to ( ) A(x) Lu = div u = 0, dist(x, E) n d 1 see the set E (A an elliptic matrix) Red: Eau de Toilette: attracts the Brownian motion towards E. Question: Geometry of E characterized by ω L vs σ? 17

Regularized Distance I: A Better Scent E = (x, φ(x)), φ(x) : R d R n d. Problem: x dist(x, E) is not a nice function. Hard to talk about ω L. 18

Regularized Distance I: A Better Scent E = (x, φ(x)), φ(x) : R d R n d. Problem: x dist(x, E) is not a nice function. Hard to talk about ω L. David-Feneuil-Mayboroda: family of smoothed out distances, D α (x). D α (x) dist(x, E). 18

Regularized Distance I: A Better Scent E = (x, φ(x)), φ(x) : R d R n d. Problem: x dist(x, E) is not a nice function. Hard to talk about ω L. David-Feneuil-Mayboroda: family of smoothed out distances, D α (x). D α (x) dist(x, E). Define (ˆ ) 1 1/α D α (x) dσ. x y d+α E 18

Regularized Distance I: A Better Scent E = (x, φ(x)), φ(x) : R d R n d. Problem: x dist(x, E) is not a nice function. Hard to talk about ω L. David-Feneuil-Mayboroda: family of smoothed out distances, D α (x). D α (x) dist(x, E). Define (ˆ ) 1 1/α D α (x) dσ. x y d+α α > 0 ensures D α (x) dist(x, E). E 18

Regularized Distance I: A Better Scent E = (x, φ(x)), φ(x) : R d R n d. Problem: x dist(x, E) is not a nice function. Hard to talk about ω L. David-Feneuil-Mayboroda: family of smoothed out distances, D α (x). D α (x) dist(x, E). Define (ˆ ) 1 1/α D α (x) dσ. x y d+α α > 0 ensures D α (x) dist(x, E). E D α sees whole geometry of E (non-local!) and is smooth in R n \E. 18

Regularized Distance I: A Better Scent E = (x, φ(x)), φ(x) : R d R n d. Problem: x dist(x, E) is not a nice function. Hard to talk about ω L. David-Feneuil-Mayboroda: family of smoothed out distances, D α (x). D α (x) dist(x, E). Define (ˆ ) 1 1/α D α (x) dσ. x y d+α α > 0 ensures D α (x) dist(x, E). E D α sees whole geometry of E (non-local!) and is smooth in R n \E. Oscillation of D α sees oscillation of φ (David-E.-Mayboroda 18) 18

Regularized Distance I: A Better Scent E = (x, φ(x)), φ(x) : R d R n d. Problem: x dist(x, E) is not a nice function. Hard to talk about ω L. David-Feneuil-Mayboroda: family of smoothed out distances, D α (x). D α (x) dist(x, E). Define (ˆ ) 1 1/α D α (x) dσ. x y d+α α > 0 ensures D α (x) dist(x, E). E D α sees whole geometry of E (non-local!) and is smooth in R n \E. Oscillation of D α sees oscillation of φ (David-E.-Mayboroda 18) Baby case! D α = constant iff φ 0. 18

Regularized Distance II: The Direct Result E = (x, φ(x)), φ : R d R n d. σ = surface measure and α > 0. Define (ˆ D α (x) E ) 1 1/α dσ(y). x y d+α ( ) 1 L α u div u. D α (x) n d 1 19

Regularized Distance II: The Direct Result E = (x, φ(x)), φ : R d R n d. σ = surface measure and α > 0. Define (ˆ D α (x) E ) 1 1/α dσ(y). x y d+α ( ) 1 L α u div u. D α (x) n d 1 Theorem (David-Feneuil-Mayboroda 2017) Let E be the graph of a Lipschitz φ : R d R n d with small Lip constant. Then ω X L α = k X dσ and k X is not too small or too big too often (A weight). 19

Regularized Distance II: The Direct Result E = (x, φ(x)), φ : R d R n d. σ = surface measure and α > 0. Define (ˆ D α (x) E ) 1 1/α dσ(y). x y d+α ( ) 1 L α u div u. D α (x) n d 1 Theorem (David-Feneuil-Mayboroda 2017) Let E be the graph of a Lipschitz φ : R d R n d with small Lip constant. Then ω X L α = k X dσ and k X is not too small or too big too often (A weight). Answers direct question in co-dimension > 1. 19

Regularized Distance II: The Direct Result E = (x, φ(x)), φ : R d R n d. σ = surface measure and α > 0. Define (ˆ D α (x) E ) 1 1/α dσ(y). x y d+α ( ) 1 L α u div u. D α (x) n d 1 Theorem (David-Feneuil-Mayboroda 2017) Let E be the graph of a Lipschitz φ : R d R n d with small Lip constant. Then ω X L α = k X dσ and k X is not too small or too big too often (A weight). Answers direct question in co-dimension > 1. Note: applies to much more general scents (i.e. any suitably smooth replacement for D α (x) (n d 1) I works). 19

What about the free boundary? E = (x, φ(x)) R n. If ω Lα = kdσ and k is nice does that mean that φ is nice? 20

What about the free boundary? E = (x, φ(x)) R n. If ω Lα = kdσ and k is nice does that mean that φ is nice? General Free Boundary Problem: Does the oscillation of k control the oscillation of φ? 20

What about the free boundary? E = (x, φ(x)) R n. If ω Lα = kdσ and k is nice does that mean that φ is nice? General Free Boundary Problem: Does the oscillation of k control the oscillation of φ? Baby Case: If k = constant must it be that φ = constant? 20

What about the free boundary? E = (x, φ(x)) R n. If ω Lα = kdσ and k is nice does that mean that φ is nice? General Free Boundary Problem: Does the oscillation of k control the oscillation of φ? Baby Case: If k = constant must it be that φ = constant? NO!!!! 20

Magic α! Let E = (x, φ(x)) R n, φ : R d R n d is Lipschitz. And α = n d 2 > 0. Theorem (David-E.-Mayboroda 18) For any E, α as above, have ω Lα = constant dσ. 21

Magic α! Let E = (x, φ(x)) R n, φ : R d R n d is Lipschitz. And α = n d 2 > 0. Theorem (David-E.-Mayboroda 18) For any E, α as above, have ω Lα = constant dσ. NOTE: A version for when E is fractal! d non-integer (here ω Lα σ). 21

Magic α! Let E = (x, φ(x)) R n, φ : R d R n d is Lipschitz. And α = n d 2 > 0. Theorem (David-E.-Mayboroda 18) For any E, α as above, have ω Lα = constant dσ. NOTE: A version for when E is fractal! d non-integer (here ω Lα σ). Recall in co-dimension 1: ω X = k X dσ, k X = constant Ω = B(X, R). 21

Magic α! Let E = (x, φ(x)) R n, φ : R d R n d is Lipschitz. And α = n d 2 > 0. Theorem (David-E.-Mayboroda 18) For any E, α as above, have ω Lα = constant dσ. NOTE: A version for when E is fractal! d non-integer (here ω Lα σ). Recall in co-dimension 1: ω X = k X dσ, k X = constant Ω = B(X, R). Takeaway: For magic α, dωα dσ doesn t control the regularity of φ, and fails to do so in the most spectacular way possible! 21

Magic α! Let E = (x, φ(x)) R n, φ : R d R n d is Lipschitz. And α = n d 2 > 0. Theorem (David-E.-Mayboroda 18) For any E, α as above, have ω Lα = constant dσ. NOTE: A version for when E is fractal! d non-integer (here ω Lα σ). Recall in co-dimension 1: ω X = k X dσ, k X = constant Ω = B(X, R). Takeaway: For magic α, dωα dσ doesn t control the regularity of φ, and fails to do so in the most spectacular way possible! D α is too nice a scent! 21

What s up with magic α? Can compute: see that for α = n d 2 we have ( ) 1 L α D α = div D α = 0. D n d 1 α The distance is a solution to the equation 22

What s up with magic α? Can compute: see that for α = n d 2 we have ( ) 1 L α D α = div D α = 0. D n d 1 α The distance is a solution to the equation D α is Green function with pole at infinity : D α on E gives dωα dσ. 22

What s up with magic α? Can compute: see that for α = n d 2 we have ( ) 1 L α D α = div D α = 0. D n d 1 α The distance is a solution to the equation D α is Green function with pole at infinity : D α on E gives dωα dσ. Note: In general computing the Green s function is VERY HARD! 22

What s up with magic α? Can compute: see that for α = n d 2 we have ( ) 1 L α D α = div D α = 0. D n d 1 α The distance is a solution to the equation D α is Green function with pole at infinity : D α on E gives dωα dσ. Note: In general computing the Green s function is VERY HARD! D α dist(x, E) ω α σ 22

What s up with magic α? Can compute: see that for α = n d 2 we have ( ) 1 L α D α = div D α = 0. D n d 1 α The distance is a solution to the equation D α is Green function with pole at infinity : D α on E gives dωα dσ. Note: In general computing the Green s function is VERY HARD! ( When α is magic D α (x) = D α dist(x, E) ω α σ E ) 1 1/α. dσ x y Note: 1 n 2 x n 2 is harmonic! 22

Open Questions about the Magic α 1 Why is magic α magic? D α satisfies an equation but what is really going on? 23

Open Questions about the Magic α 1 Why is magic α magic? D α satisfies an equation but what is really going on? Physical/geometric/probabilistic interpretation? 23

Open Questions about the Magic α 1 Why is magic α magic? D α satisfies an equation but what is really going on? Physical/geometric/probabilistic interpretation? 2 Is this emblematic or pathological? Is any other β magic? 23

Open Questions about the Magic α 1 Why is magic α magic? D α satisfies an equation but what is really going on? Physical/geometric/probabilistic interpretation? 2 Is this emblematic or pathological? Is any other β magic? Can we prove the converse for ω β with β not magic? 23

Open Questions about the Magic α 1 Why is magic α magic? D α satisfies an equation but what is really going on? Physical/geometric/probabilistic interpretation? 2 Is this emblematic or pathological? Is any other β magic? Can we prove the converse for ω β with β not magic? 3 What does α D α look like? The power 1 α makes this question harder. 23

Open Questions about the Magic α 1 Why is magic α magic? D α satisfies an equation but what is really going on? Physical/geometric/probabilistic interpretation? 2 Is this emblematic or pathological? Is any other β magic? Can we prove the converse for ω β with β not magic? 3 What does α D α look like? The power 1 α makes this question harder. 4 Can we do this in co-dimension one? Two? 23

Thanks! Thank You For Listening! The way of Laplace! 24