Bayesian Reconstruction of the WIMP Velocity Distribution Function from Direct Dark Matter Detection Data

Similar documents
Extracting Astrophysical Information about Galactic Dark Matter with and without Astrophysical Prior Knowledge

Bayesian Reconstruction of the WIMP Velocity Distribution with a Non-Negligible Threshold Energy

Determining WIMP Properties with the AMIDAS Package

Progress of the AMIDAS Package for Reconstructing WIMP Properties

Distinguishing Dark Matter Candidates from Direct Detection Experiments

WIMP Velocity Distribution and Mass from Direct Detection Experiments

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.he] 7 Aug 2015

Introduction to Direct Dark Matter Detection Experiments

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.im] 13 Nov 2014

Analyzing direct dark matter detection data with unrejected background events by the AMIDAS website

Learning from WIMPs. Manuel Drees. Bonn University. Learning from WIMPs p. 1/29

Introduction to Direct Dark Matter Detection Phenomenology

Daniel Gazda. Chalmers University of Technology. Progress in Ab Initio Techniques in Nuclear Physics TRIUMF, Feb 28 Mar 3, 2017

Search for Inelastic Dark Matter with the CDMS experiment. Sebastian Arrenberg Universität Zürich Doktorierendenseminar 2010 Zürich,

What is the probability that direct detection experiments have observed Dark Matter?

Primer on statistics:

Inert Doublet Model and DAMA:

Background and sensitivity predictions for XENON1T

Recent results from PandaX- II and status of PandaX-4T

An introduction to Bayesian reasoning in particle physics

Direct detection calculations. Riccardo Catena. Chalmers University

Non-Standard Interaction of Solar Neutrinos in Dark Matter Detectors

Collider Searches for Dark Matter

Statistical Methods in Particle Physics

Coherency in Neutrino-Nucleus Elastic Scattering

COLD DARK MATTER DETECTION VIA THE LSP-NUCLEUS ELASTIC SCATTERING 1

XENON100. Marc Schumann. Physik Institut, Universität Zürich. IDM 2010, Montpellier, July 26 th,

Measurements of liquid xenon s response to low-energy particle interactions

E. Santovetti lesson 4 Maximum likelihood Interval estimation

Lecture 5: Bayes pt. 1

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 4 Nov 2017

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 7 Nov 2012

Solar and atmospheric neutrinos as background for direct dark matter searches

Can the DAMA annual modulation be explained by Dark Matter?

Lecture 12. Dark Matter. Part II What it could be and what it could do

Statistical Data Analysis Stat 3: p-values, parameter estimation

CHANNELING IN DIRECT DARK MATTER DETECTION

Effective theory of dark matter direct detection. Riccardo Catena. Chalmers University of Technology

Systematic uncertainties in statistical data analysis for particle physics. DESY Seminar Hamburg, 31 March, 2009

Measurement of the e + e - π 0 γ cross section at SND

Neutrino bounds on dark matter. Alejandro Ibarra Technische Universität München

A halo-independent lower bound on the DM capture rate in the Sun from a DD signal

Scintillation efficiency measurement of Na recoils in NaI(Tl) below the DAMA/LIBRA energy threshold

No combined analysis of all experiments available

The local dark matter halo density. Riccardo Catena. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Heidelberg

DARK MATTER INTERACTIONS

DM direct detection predictions from hydrodynamic simulations

DARWIN. Marc Schumann. U Freiburg LAUNCH 17 Heidelberg, September 15,

Physics 403. Segev BenZvi. Propagation of Uncertainties. Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Rochester

light dm in the light of cresst-ii

DARWIN. Marc Schumann. U Freiburg PATRAS 2017 Thessaloniki, May 19,

In collaboration w/ G. Giudice, D. Kim, JCP, S. Shin arxiv: Jong-Chul Park. 2 nd IBS-KIAS Joint High1 January 08 (2018)

Introduction into Bayesian statistics

Statistics and Data Analysis

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN. K. Scholberg, Duke University On behalf of the COHERENT collaboration August 2, 2017 DPF 2017, Fermilab

Nuclear Recoil Scintillation and Ionization Yields in Liquid Xenon

Events with High P T Leptons and Missing P T and Anomalous Top at HERA

Dark matter searches and prospects at the ATLAS experiment

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 28 Sep 2010

Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning. Learning Algorithms

Recent results from the LHCb experiment

Search for heavy neutrinos in kaon decays

A novel determination of the local dark matter density. Riccardo Catena. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Heidelberg

Whither WIMP Dark Matter Search? Pijushpani Bhattacharjee AstroParticle Physics & Cosmology Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata

A survey of recent dark matter direct detection results

Charged current single pion to quasi-elastic cross section ratio in MiniBooNE. Steven Linden PAVI09 25 June 2009

- A Bayesian approach

Cristiano Alpigiani Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, 18 May 2017

Scintillation Efficiency of Nuclear Recoils in Liquid Xenon. T. Wongjirad, L. Kastens, A. Manzur, K. Ni, and D.N. McKinsey Yale University

Lecture 3. G. Cowan. Lecture 3 page 1. Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis

Model Fitting in Particle Physics

TWO-PHASE DETECTORS USING THE NOBLE LIQUID XENON. Henrique Araújo Imperial College London

Axion Detection With NMR

Lecture 2: From Linear Regression to Kalman Filter and Beyond

Hypothesis Testing - Frequentist

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Nov 2009

Error analysis for efficiency

Introduction to Statistical Methods for High Energy Physics

Cryodetectors, CRESST and Background

The WIMPless Miracle and the DAMA Puzzle

Dark Matter Search Results from the Silicon Detectors of the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Experiment

Bayesian inference. Rasmus Waagepetersen Department of Mathematics Aalborg University Denmark. April 10, 2017

On Symmetric/Asymmetric Light Dark Matter

Two Early Exotic searches with dijet events at ATLAS

Dark Matter Searches in CMS. Ashok Kumar Delhi University - Delhi

Two-body currents in WIMP nucleus scattering

The Lightest Higgs Boson and Relic Neutralino in the MSSM with CP Violation

WIMP Recoil Rates and Exclusion Plots Brian, April 2007

Development of a New Paradigm

Measurement of inclusive charged jet production in pp and Pb-Pb

Naïve Bayes classification

Statistical Methods in Particle Physics Lecture 1: Bayesian methods

A cancellation mechanism for dark matter-nucleon interaction: non-abelian case

Direct detection detection of recoil nuclei after interaction of DM particle in large underground scale detector. DAMA, CDMS, ZENON... experiments.

Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II Dark Matter Search

Earth WIMP search with IceCube. Jan Kunnen for the IceCube Collaboration

INDIRECT DARK MATTER DETECTION

Germanium-phobic exothermic Dark Matter and the CDMS-II Silicon excess

The Neutron/WIMP Acceptance In XENON100

A computational tool of DM relic abundance and direct detection. M. Backovic, F. Maltoni, A. Martini, Mat McCaskey, K.C. Kong, G.

Transcription:

Bayesian Reconstruction of the WIMP Velocity Distribution Function from Direct Dark Matter Detection Data Chung-Lin Shan National Center for Theoretical Sciences National Tsing Hua University April 18, 2014 Based on arxiv:1403.5610

Outline Review Dark Matter searches Model-independent data analyses Bayesian analysis technique AMIDAS-II package and website Online demonstration - blind analyses Summary C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 1

Review Dark Matter searches Dark Matter searches C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 2

Review Dark Matter searches Dark Matter searches DM should have small, but non-zero interactions with SM matter. = Three different ways to detect DM particles p, e DM DM e, ν µ, γ DM DM (, ) p, e + DM ( ) DM e +, p, D q q Colliders Indirect detection Direct detection C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 3

Review Model-independent data analyses Model-independent data analyses C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 4

Review Model-independent data analyses Motivation Differential event rate for elastic WIMP-nucleus scattering dr vmax [ ] f1(v) dq = AF 2 (Q) dv v min (Q) v Here v min (Q) = α Astrophysics Q is the minimal incoming velocity of incident WIMPs that can deposit the recoil energy Q in the detector, A ρ0σ0 mn α m 2m χmr,n 2 2mr,N 2 r,n = mχm N 2 m χ + m N Particle physics ρ 0 : WIMP density near the Earth σ 0 : total cross section ignoring the form factor suppression F (Q): elastic nuclear form factor f 1 (v): one-dimensional velocity distribution of halo WIMPs C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 5

Review Model-independent data analyses Motivation Differential event rate for elastic WIMP-nucleus scattering dr vmax [ ] f1(v) dq = AF 2 (Q) dv v min (Q) v Here v min (Q) = α Q is the minimal incoming velocity of incident WIMPs that can deposit the recoil energy Q in the detector, ρ0σ0 A 2m χmr,n 2 α mn 2m 2 r,n m r,n = mχm N m χ + m N ρ 0 : WIMP density near the Earth σ 0 : total cross section ignoring the form factor suppression F (Q): elastic nuclear form factor f 1 (v): one-dimensional velocity distribution of halo WIMPs C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 6

Review Model-independent data analyses Reconstruction of the WIMP velocity distribution Normalized one-dimensional WIMP velocity distribution function { [ ( )]} d 1 dr f 1 (v) = N 2Q dq F 2 (Q) dq N = 2 { [ 1 1 α 0 Q F 2 (Q) ( )] } dr 1 dq dq Q=v 2 /α 2 Moments of the velocity distribution function ( α v n n+1 = N (Q thre ) 2 N (Q thre ) = 2 α [ 2Q 1/2 thre F 2 (Q thre ) [ I n(q thre ) = Q (n 1)/2 Q thre ) [ 2Q (n+1)/2 thre F 2 (Q thre ) ( ) dr dq ( ) dr + I 0 (Q thre ) dq Q=Q thre 1 F 2 (Q) ( )] dr dq dq + (n + 1)I n(q thre ) Q=Q thre ] 1 [M. Drees and CLS, JCAP 0706, 011 (2007)] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 7 ]

Review Model-independent data analyses Reconstruction of the WIMP velocity distribution Ansatz: the measured recoil spectrum in the nth Q-bin ( ) dr r n e kn(q Qs,n) r n Nn dq expt, Q Q n b n Logarithmic slope and shifted point in the nth Q-bin Q Q n n 1 N n ( ) bn (Q n,i Q n) = coth N n 2 i=1 Q s,n = Q n + 1 [ ] sinh(knbn/2) ln k n k nb n/2 ( knb n 2 ) 1 k n Reconstructing the one-dimensional WIMP velocity distribution [ ] [ 2Qs,nrn d ] f 1 (v s,n) = N F 2 (Q s,n) dq ln F 2 (Q) k n Q=Qs,n [ ] N = 2 1 1 v s,n = α Q s,n α Qa F 2 (Q a) a [M. Drees and CLS, JCAP 0706, 011 (2007)] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 8

Review Model-independent data analyses Reconstruction of the WIMP velocity distribution Reconstructed f 1,rec (v s,n ) ( 76 Ge, 500 events, 5 bins, up to 3 bins per window) [M. Drees and CLS, JCAP 0706, 011 (2007)] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 9

Review Model-independent data analyses Determination of the WIMP mass Estimating the moments of the WIMP velocity distribution v n = α n 2Q1/2 min r 1 min F 2 (Q min ) + I 0 2Q(n+1)/2 r min min F 2 + (n + 1)I n (Q min ) I n = a Q (n 1)/2 a F 2 (Q a) Determining the WIMP mass mx m m χ v Y m X R n n = R n m X /m Y R n = ( ) dr r min = = r 1 e k 1 (Q min Q s,1 ) dq expt, Q=Q min [M. Drees and CLS, JCAP 0706, 011 (2007)] 2Q(n+1)/2 min,x r min,x /FX 2 (Q min,x ) + (n + 1)I n,x (X ) 1/n 1 Y 2Q 1/2 (n 0) min,x r min,x /F X 2 (Q min,x ) + I 0,X Assuming a dominant SI scalar WIMP-nucleus interaction m χ σ = (m X /m Y ) 5/2 m Y m X R σ R σ (m X /m Y ) 5/2 R σ = E Y E X [CLS and M. Drees, arxiv:0710.4296] 2Q1/2 min,x r min,x /F 2 X (Q min,x ) + I 0,X 2Q 1/2 min,y r min,x /F 2 Y (Q min,y ) + I 0,Y [M. Drees and CLS, JCAP 0806, 012 (2008)] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 10

Review Model-independent data analyses Determination of the WIMP mass χ 2 -fitting ( ) fi,x f i,y C 1 ( ) ij fj,x f j,y χ 2 (m χ) = i,j where f i,x = α i 2Q(i+1)/2 min,x r min,x /FX 2 (Q min,x ) + (i + 1)I ( i,x X 2Q 1/2 min,x r min,x /FX 2 (Q min,x ) + I 0,X f nmax+1,x = E X A 2 X 2Q 1/2 min,x r min,x /FX 2 (Q min,x ) + I 0,X C ij = cov ( f i,x, f j,x ) + cov ( fi,y, f j,y ) 1 300 km/s ( mx m χ + m X ) ) i Algorithmic Q max matching ( ) 2 αx Q max,y = Q max,x α Y (v cut = α Q max ) [M. Drees and CLS, JCAP 0806, 012 (2008)] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 11

Review Model-independent data analyses Determination of the WIMP mass Reconstructed m χ,rec ( 28 Si + 76 Ge, Q max < 100 kev, 2 50 events) [M. Drees and CLS, JCAP 0806, 012 (2008)] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 12

Bayesian reconstruction of the WIMP velocity distribution function C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 13

Aim Reconstructed f 1,rec (v s,n ) with an input WIMP mass ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,gen,sh (v)) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 14

Bayesian analysis technique Bayesian analysis technique C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 15

Bayesian analysis technique Bayesian analysis technique Baye s theorem p(a B) = p(b A) p(a) p(b) = p(b A) p(a) p(b A) p(a) + p(b A) p(a) p(a) = 1 p(a) Bayesian statistics p(theory result) = p(result theory) p(result) p(theory) Bayesian analysis p(θ data) = p(data Θ) p(data) p(θ) C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 16

Bayesian analysis technique Bayesian analysis technique Bayesian analysis p(θ data) = p(data Θ) p(θ) p(data) Θ: { a 1, a 2,, a NBayesian }, a specified (combination of the) value(s) of the fitting parameter(s) p(θ): prior probability, our degree of belief about Θ being the true value(s) of fitting parameter(s), often given in form of the (multiplication of the) probability distribution(s) of the fitting parameter(s) p(data): evidence, the total probability of obtaining the particular set of data p(data Θ): the probability of the observed result, once the specified (combination of the) value(s) of the fitting parameter(s) happens, usually be described by the likelihood function of Θ, L(Θ). p(θ data): posterior probability density function for Θ, the probability of that the specified (combination of the) value(s) of the fitting parameter(s) happens, given the observed result C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 17

Bayesian analysis technique Bayesian analysis technique Likelihood function for p(data Θ) with Theoretical one-dimensional WIMP velocity distribution function: f 1,th (v; a 1, a 2,, a NBayesian ) Assuming that the reconstructed data points are Gaussian-distributed around the theoretical predictions ) L (f 1,rec(v s,µ), µ = 1, 2,, W ; a i, i = 1, 2,, N Bayesian W ) Gau (v s,µ, f 1,rec(v s,µ), σ f1,s,µ; a 1, a 2,, a NBayesian µ=1 ) Gau (v s,µ, f 1,rec(v s,µ), σ f1,s,µ; a 1, a 2,, a NBayesian [ ] 1 2 / e f 1,rec (v s,µ) f 1,th (v s,µ;a 1,a 2,,a NBayesian ) 2σf 2 1,s,µ 2π σf1,s,µ C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 18

Bayesian analysis technique Bayesian analysis technique Probability distribution functions for p(θ) Without prior knowledge about the fitting parameter Flat-distributed p i (a i ) = 1 for a i,min a i a i,max, With prior knowledge about the fitting parameter Around a theoretical predicted/estimated or experimental measured value µ a,i With (statistical) uncertainties σ a,i Gaussian-distributed p i (a i ; µ a,i, σ a,i ) = 1 2π σa,i e (a i µ a,i ) 2 /2σ 2 a,i C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 19

C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 20

Input and fitting one-dimensional WIMP velocity distribution functions One-parameter shifted Maxwellian velocity distribution f 1,sh,v0 (v) = 1 ( ) v [ ] e (v ve)2 /v0 2 e (v+ve)2 /v0 2 v e = 1.05 v 0 π v 0 v e Shifted Maxwellian velocity distribution f 1,sh (v) = 1 ( ) v [ ] e (v ve)2 /v0 2 e (v+ve)2 /v0 2 π v 0 v e Variated shifted Maxwellian velocity distribution f 1,sh, v (v) = 1 [ ] { } v e [v (v 0+ v)] 2 /v0 2 e [v+(v 0+ v)] 2 /v0 2 π v 0 (v 0 + v) Simple Maxwellian velocity distribution f 1,Gau (v) = 4 ( v 2 ) π v0 3 e v 2 /v0 2 Modified simple Maxwellian velocity distribution f 1,Gau,k (v) = v 2 ( ) e v 2 /kv0 2 e v max 2 /kv 2 k 0 for v v max N f,k C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 21

Reconstructed f 1,Bayesian (v) with an input WIMP mass ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh,v0 (v), flat-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 22

Reconstructed f 1,Bayesian (v) with an input WIMP mass ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh,v0 (v), flat-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 23

Distribution of the reconstructed v 0 ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh,v0 (v), flat-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 24

Reconstructed f 1,Bayesian (v) with an input WIMP mass ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh,v0 (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 25

Distribution of the reconstructed v 0 ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh,v0 (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 26

Reconstructed f 1,Bayesian (v) with an input WIMP mass ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 27

Distribution of the reconstructed v 0 v e ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 28

Distribution of the reconstructed v 0 ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 29

Distribution of the reconstructed v e ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 30

Reconstructed f 1,Bayesian (v) with an input WIMP mass ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh, v (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 31

Distribution of the reconstructed v 0 v ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh, v (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 32

Distribution of the reconstructed v 0 ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh, v (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 33

Distribution of the reconstructed v ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,sh, v (v), Gaussian-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 34

Reconstructed f 1,Bayesian (v) with an input WIMP mass ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,Gau (v), flat-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 35

Distribution of the reconstructed v 0 ( 76 Ge, 0-100 kev, 500 events, m χ = 100 GeV, f 1,sh,v0 (v) f 1,Gau (v), flat-dist.) [CLS, arxiv:1403.5610] C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 36

AMIDAS-II package and website AMIDAS-II package and website C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 37

AMIDAS-II package and website AMIDAS-II package and website A Model-Independent Data Analysis System for direct Dark Matter detection experiments and phenomenology DAMNED Dark Matter Web Tool (ILIAS Project) http://pisrv0.pit.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/darkmatter/amidas/ [CLS, arxiv:0909.1459, 0910.1971; 1403.5611 ] TiResearch (Taiwan interactive Research, 臺灣互動研究網 ) http://www.tir.tw/phys/hep/dm/amidas/ Online interactive simulation/data analysis system Full Monte Carlo simulations Theoretical estimations Real/pseudo- data analyses C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 38

AMIDAS-II package and website Online demonstration - blind analyses Online demonstration - blind analyses C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 39

Summary Summary C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 40

Summary Summary By using Bayesian analysis/fitting one could reconstruct f 1 (v) very precisely: small or even negligible systematic deviations of v 0, v e and the peak position of f 1 (v) 1σ statistical uncertainties of < 20 km/s on v 0, v e and the peak position of f 1 (v) With prior knowledge about fitting parameters systematic deviations and statistical uncertainties could be reduced (significantly) even when the expected values are (slightly) incorrect Using variated analytic form of the same fitting f 1 (v) systematic deviations could be reduced (significantly) statistical uncertainties might however be (a bit) larger C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 41

Summary Summary Using an improper fitting f 1 (v) information about the true velocity distribution function (e.g. the peak position of f 1 (v)) could still be reconstructed approximately with clearly 2σ - 6σ deviations of v 0 and v e from the theoretical expections For light m χ : (very) shape recoil energy spectrum only with very few reconstructed-input data points For heavy m χ : large statistical fluctuation of and uncertainty on m χ,rec only with reconstructed-input data points in the low-velocity range With a small fraction of unrejected background events C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 42

Summary Thank you very much for your attention! C.-L. Shan NCTS, NTHU, April 18, 2014 p. 43