by Pentti Varpasuo* Fortum Nuclear Services Ltd Rajatorpantie 8, Vantaa, Fortum

Similar documents
ESTIMATION OF SEISMIC HAZARD ON A PROSPECTIVE NPP SITE IN SOUTHERN FINLAND

Ground Motion Attenuation Uncertainties for Intraplate Earthquakes with an Application to Southern Finland.

THE DEVELOPING OF GROUND RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR EXTREME SEISMIC EVENTS IN SOUTHERN FINLAND

Seismic Recording Station AZ_PFO Summary Report

NPSAG workshop, Stockholm, March 13, slides total 1

SEISMIC CALIBRATION OF THE EUROPEAN ARCTIC

Seismic Recording Station TA_109C Summary Report

Seismic hazard modeling for Bulgaria D. Solakov, S. Simeonova

Finding out what earthquakes have happened recently Subscribe to an alert system

Opportunities for Source Modelling to Support the Seismic Hazard Estimation for NPP s SYP2016/NST2016 Vilho Jussila, Ludovic Fülöp

Seismic Hazard Switzerland. When, where, and how often does certain shaking occur in Switzerland?

POSSIBLE SHIFTS IN MARIA REACTOR REACTIVITY AND POWER CHANGES CAUSED BY THE SEISMIC EVENT

SOURCE PROCESS OF THE 2003 PUERTO PLATA EARTHQUAKE USING TELESEISMIC DATA AND STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATION

Bayesian Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Nuclear Power Plant

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Earthquake Lab Introduction: Purpose: Method: Equipment needed: Fundamental Concepts and Key Terms:

Mine Seismology Workshop

Prediction of Great Japan Earthquake 11 March of 2011 by analysis of microseismic noise. Does Japan approach the next Mega-EQ?

Seismic Observation and Seismicity of Zimbabwe

Earthquakes and Earth s Interior

Earthquakes and seismic hazard in Sweden

MF-19 SOLAR RADIOMETRY INSTRUMENT IN THE FRAME OF THE MODERNIZATION OF ROSHYDROMET OBSERVATION NETWORK

SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING ON THE BASIS OF POLARIZATION ANALYSIS

Analysis Of Earthquake Records of Istanbul Earthquake Rapid Response System Stations Related to the Determination of Site Fundamental Frequency

Investigation of long period amplifications in the Greater Bangkok basin by microtremor observations

Modelling Strong Ground Motions for Subduction Events in the Wellington Region, New Zealand

STRONG GROUND MOTION ATTENUATION IN THE SEA OF JAPAN (OKHOTSK-AMUR PLATES BOUNDARY) REGION

Estimation of Seismic Shutoff of Intelligent Gas Meters in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area

The Comparative Analysis of Methods for Calculation of Buildings With Rubber Bearings

PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE 2011 JAPAN EARTHQUAKE (M 9.0) GROUND MOTION RECORDS V1.01

5. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

BROADBAND STRONG MOTION SIMULATION OF THE 2004 NIIGATA- KEN CHUETSU EARTHQUAKE: SOURCE AND SITE EFFECTS

Tokyo, Japan,

IRIS Seismographs in Schools Program

OBS Park in Warsaw 2017 European OBS Technical Workshop Paris, France,

LOCAL MAGNITUDE SCALE FOR MONGOLIA AND DETERMINATION OF M WP AND M S (BB)

Determining the Earthquake Epicenter: Japan

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Earthquake. What is it? Can we predict it?

Figure Locations of the CWB free-field strong motion stations, the epicenter, and the surface fault of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake.

Mine Seismology Workshop

Seismic Observations during September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attack

NEAR FIELD EXPERIMENTAL SEISMIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON WITH ALGERIAN REGULATORY DESIGN SPECTRUM

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

THE KINEMATIC OF THE MOTION PERCEIVED IN THE TALL BUILDINGS OF BUENOS AIRES CITY CAUSED BY THE GREAT 2010 CHILEAN SEISMIC EVENT

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Quetta, Pakistan

20 and 29 May events. Luigi Petti, Alessio Lodato

Underlying Reasons for the Wide Range of Yield Estimates for the Underground Nuclear Explosion of September 3, 2017, in North Korea

ON THE RELATION BETWEEN GPS STRAIN FIELD AND ACTIVE FAULTS IN THE EASTERN BALTIC REGION

The quarter-wavelength average velocity: a review of some past and recent application developments

Seismology, Seismic Data Analysis, Hazard Assessment and Risk Mitigation

Why 1G Was Recorded at TCU129 Site During the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake

Virtual European Broadband Seismic Network. Status, QC and services

Earthquakes. Building Earth s Surface, Part 2. Science 330 Summer What is an earthquake?

revised October 30, 2001 Carlos Mendoza

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis in Thailand and Adjacent Areas by Using Regional Seismic Source Zones

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN

SEISMIC CALIBRATION OF THE EUROPEAN ARCTIC

CHARACTERISTICS OF SOURCE SPECTRA OF SMALL AND LARGE INTERMEDIATE DEPTH EARTHQUAKES AROUND HOKKAIDO, JAPAN

The Slapdown Phase in High Acceleration Records of Large Earthquakes

Magnitude 7.4 SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND REGION

4 Associate Professor, DPRI, Kyoto University, Uji, Japan

Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment

P Swedish National Seismic Network (SNSN) A short report on recorded earthquakes during the first quarter of the year 2003

Ground-motion and Intensity: were the Basel 2006 and St. Gallen 2013 Events Fundamentally Different?

Earthquakes.

What Are Recorded In A Strong-Motion Record?

Long-period Ground Motion Characteristics of the Osaka Sedimentary Basin during the 2011 Great Tohoku Earthquake

Acoustic Process in the Earth Crust Between Sunrise & Sunset

Crustal deformation by the Southeast-off Kii Peninsula Earthquake

Elastic rebound theory

PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS AT GROUND SURFACE IN JAPAN BASED ON SITE EFFECTS ESTIMATED FROM OBSERVED STRONG-MOTION RECORDS

Digital Research Space of Induced Seismicity for EPOS Purposes (IS-EPOS project)

EARTHQUAKES. Bruce A. Bolt. Fifth Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company New York. University of California, Berkeley

Earthquakes Earth, 9th edition, Chapter 11 Key Concepts What is an earthquake? Earthquake focus and epicenter What is an earthquake?

INTERPRETATION OF SEISMOGRAMS

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

Internal Layers of the Earth

Earthquake information

the IRIS Consortium Collaborative, Multi-user Facilities for Research and Education Briefing NSF Business Systems Review September 9, 2008

LIGHTNING LOCATION NETWORK ON THE EUROPEAN TERRITORY OF RUSSIA

PRELIMINARY REPORT. July 21th 2017 Bodrum Offshore Earthquake (Muğla-Turkey) Mw=6.5.

Modelling as a Tool to Augment Ground Motion Data in Regions of Diffuse Seismicity Final report

The March 11, 2011, Tohoku-oki earthquake (Japan): surface displacement and source modelling

ANNEX 23 RESOLUTION MSC.231(82) ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE EXISTING MANDATORY SHIP REPORTING SYSTEM IN THE GULF OF FINLAND

Estimation of Seismic Hazard in the Kaliningrad Region

26th Seismic Research Review - Trends in Nuclear Explosion Monitoring

A magnitude 7.8 earthquake has occurred km (63.3 mi) ESE of Suva, Fiji at a depth of km (378 miles).

SEISMOLOGY. - The study of earthquakes waves and how they move through the body and around the surface of the earth.

Engineering Characteristics of Ground Motion Records of the Val-des-Bois, Quebec, Earthquake of June 23, 2010

LAB 9: Earthquakes & Seismic Activity

EARTH OBSERVATION SERVICES IN REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

Y. Shioi 1, Y. Hashizume 2 and H. Fukada 3

Earthquakes and Seismic Waves Lesson 4 2

Department of Civil Engineering, Kyoto University, by Shunzo OKAMOTO, M. J. A., Sept.

Spots of Seismic Danger Extracted by Properties of Low-Frequency Seismic Noise

Earthquake location at teleseismic distances from 3-component records (Tutorial with exercise by hand)

Seatrack Web Developments

RELATIONSHIP OF SEISMIC RESPONSES AND STRENGTH INDEXES OF GROUND MOTIONS FOR NPP STRUCTURES

Transcription:

THE INFORMATION REPORT OF EARTHQUAKES IN NORTHWEST OF RUSSIA CLOSE TO THE CITY OF KALININGRAD ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 AND THE ASSESSMENT OF THEIR EFFECTS AT OL3 NPP SITE by Pentti Varpasuo* Fortum Nuclear Services Ltd Rajatorpantie 8, Vantaa, 00048 Fortum e-mail: pentti.varpasuo@fortum.com Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 1

1 Introduction On September 21, 2004 in northwest Russia close the city of Kaliningrad a series of earthquakes occurred, with maximum magnitude of the main shock (Ms=4.3) at 13:32 minutes in Greenwich time. It was preceded with earthquake with magnitude of Ms=4.0 at 11:05 minutes of the Greenwich time. Weaker subsequent push is registered also at 13:36 minutes of Greenwich time. Two first earthquakes were felt in territory of the Kaliningrad area and in the adjoining areas of Belarus, the Baltic states, in northern areas of Poland and in the south of Finland. Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 2

2 THE BULLETIN OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES The Kaliningrad earthquake is registered by all stations of the Institute of Geophysics of the Polish Academy of Sciences. The station of this network located nearest to the epicentre is Suwalki (SUW). The Suwalki and Vasula records are available in the EMCS data bank Wilber II. In addition to the above records available in the analysis of Russian Academy of Sciences the Kaliningrad event has been registered by Petrozavodsk of Institute of Geology of the Karelian Centre of Science of the Russian Academy of Science. The Petrosavodsk records have also been transferred to Obninsk and used at the determination of hypocenter locations of Kaliningrad earthquakes by Russian Academy of Science. In Figure 1 fragments of the seismogram records of the first earthquake at 11:05 minutes from 4 digital stations accessible to Academy of Sciences of Russian Federation are depicted. In Figure 2 fragments of seismogram records of the same digital stations for the main shock at 13:32 minutes are submitted. Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 3

Figure 1: The registrations of VSU, KHC, PUL and OBN stations of the BHZ component of the 11:05 event. Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 4

Figure 2 The registrations of VSU, KHC, PUL and OBN stations of the BHZ component of the 11:32 event Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 5

3 THE BULLETIN OF THE UPPSALA UNIVERSITY The web site of the Uppsala University gave the eeismograms of the both events in Kaliningrad registered at Byxelkrok, Oskarshamn and Vastervik stations for three perpendicular displacement components BHN, BHE and BHZ. The university web site gave also the data in compressed, digital form but during the short time frame allocated to this investigation it was not possible to convert these records to ASCII format. In the following Figure 3 is given the seismogram record of the Oskarshamn station for the Kaliningrad main shock at 13:32. Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 6

Figure 3. The seismogram record for Kaliningrad main event at 13:32 in Oskarshamn station Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 7

4 THE INSTITUTE OF SEISMOLOGY OF UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI INFORMATION BULLETIN The Institute of Seismology of Helsinki University provided the records of two stations for this investgation. The records were the three component seismograms at stations of Virolahti and Kevo. The locations of these stations are shown in the map of Figure 4. The obtained digital records were differentiated numerically twice to obtain the acceleration records. In the following two Figures 5 and 6 the BHN component acceleration record is given for the Kaliningrad main event at Virolahti and at Kevo: Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 8

Figure 4 Locations of Finnish seismogram stations Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 9

FI_VJF_BHN_COMPONENT_ACC 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 acc m/s/s 0-0.02-0.04-0.06-0.08-0.1 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 seconds Figure 5. The Kaliningrad main event. Virolahti acceleration record for BHN component Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 10

FI_KEV_BHN_COMPONENT_ACC 0.001 0.0005 acc m/s/s 0-0.0005-0.001 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 seconds Figure 6. The Kaliningrad main event. Kevo acceleration record for BHN component Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 11

5 ORFEUS DATABANK INFORMATION Orfeus stands for Observatories and Research Facilities for European Seismology. ORFEUS is the European non-profit organisation that aims at coordinating and promoting digital, broad-band seismology in Europe. Orfeus located and sized the Kaliningrad earthquakes as follows: 1) Earthquake mb 4.4 close to the city of Ladushkin September 21st, 2004, 11:05 UTC; 2) Earthquake mb 5.0 close to the city of Primorsk September 21st, 2004, 13:32 UTC. The seismogram data in Orfeus is available for following stations that are depicted in Figure 7. Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 12

Figure 7. The location map of the recording stations for the Kaliningrad quakes in Orfeus Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 13

In the following two Figures 8 and 9 the acceleration time histories differentiated from German GEOFON records at Suwalki, and Vasula for BHN component are given in form of time histories. The length of the histories is about 5 minutes for each history and the time step is 0.05 seconds. The calibration coefficient in the seismograms is of the order of 1E+9, which means that the recorded values have to be divided by this coefficient in order to get ground displacements in meters. Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 14

2 GE_SUW_BHN_COMPONENT_ACC 1.5 1 acc m/s/s 0.5 0-0.5-1 -1.5-2 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 seconds Figure 8. The recorded acceleration time history at Suwalki station Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 15

GE_VSU_BHN_COMPONENT_ACC acc m/s/s 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.01-0.01-0.03-0.05-0.07-0.09-0.11 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 seconds Figure 9. The recorded acceleration time history at Vasula station Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 16

6 PROCESSING OF THE COLLECTED DATA In order to assess the intensity of the ground shaking with various distances from the epicentre the acceleration response spectra for 5% damping were generated for Suwalki, Vasula and Virolahti records and for horizontal BHN component. To assess the hazard at Olkiluoto site the YVL 2.6 design ground spectrum was included in the same Figure 10. Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 17

The effect of Kaliningrad quake at various distances and OL3 design spetrum YVL_2_6 1 Spectral acceleration (g) 0.1 0.01. 0.001 0.0001 0.1 1 10 100 Frequency Hz Virolahti_N_comp Suwalki_N_comp Vasula_N_comp YVL_2_6 Figure 10. The recorder acceleration spectra and the OL3 design spectrum Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 18

7 CONCLUSION As it can be seen from the Figure 10 the Kaliningrad event does not constitute significant seismic hazard at Olkiluoto site or at comparable distances from epicenter. Fortum CSNI Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan 17.11.2004 19