EXTRAPOLATION STUDIES ON ADSORPTION OF THORIUM AND URANIUM AT DIFFERENT SOLUTION COMPOSITIONS ON SOIL SEDIMENTS Syed Hakimi Sakuma

Similar documents
WM 04 Conference, February 29 March 4, 2004, Tucson AZ ESTIMATING SITE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOILS FOR SURFACE COMPLEXATION MODELING OF SORPTION

North-West University, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa. 2. *Corresponding author:

The Influence of Humic Acid and Colloidal Silica on the Sorption of U(VI) onto SRS Sediments Collected from the F/H Area

Sorption of selected radionuclides to clay in the presence of humic acid

On the Influence of Ionic Strength on Radium and Strontium Sorption to Sandy Loam Soils

12. Lead, Pb (atomic no. 82)

Studying the Effect of Crystal Size on Adsorption Properties of Clay

Distribution of radionuclides in soils modelling the dependence on soil parameters

Effect of Humic Acid on the Selenite Adsorption onto Hematite

GEOCHEMISTRY, GROUNDWATER AND POLLUTION,

The Geochemistry of Natural Waters

WM 00 Conference, February 27 March 2, 2000, Tucson, AZ DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS OF CRITICAL RADIONUCLIDES FROM RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN GEOLOGICAL MEDIUM

A Milestone Final Report of YMP. July 10, N. Lu I. R. Triay C. R. Cotter H. D. Kitten J. Bentley

Contents Preface Introduction Model Concepts

Thermodynamic parameters of Cs + sorption on natural clays

Chemical Hydrogeology

The Sorption Properties of Humate Injected into the Subsurface System. Hansell Gonzalez Raymat DOE Fellow Graduate Student, Ph.D.

RESULTS OF AN AQUEOUS SOURCE TERM MODEL FOR A RADIOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE DRIGG LLW SITE, UK.

Adsorption of Sb(V) on Goethite: Effect of ph, Ionic Strength, and Competition with Phosphate

Groundwater chemistry

Particles in aqueous environments

Treatment of Colloids in the Safety Case

CHEMICAL EFFECTS OF GOETHITE COLLOID ON THE TRANSPORT OF URANIUM (VI) THROUGH A SATURATED QUARTZ-PACKED COLUMN

enable measurement. This method separates these isotopes effectively.

Chemistry 20 Final Review Solutions Checklist Knowledge Key Terms Solutions

IMO LATERITIC SOIL AS A SORBENT FOR HEAVY METALS

Synthesis and Application of Manganese Dioxide Coated Magnetite for Removal of Trace Contaminants from Water. Carla Calderon, Wolfgang H.

CEE 680 Lecture #2 1/23/2016

Distribution of radionuclides in soils dependence on soil parameters

Redox, ph, pe OUTLINE 9/12/17. Equilibrium? Finish last lecture Mineral stability Aquatic chemistry oxidation and reduction: redox

May 09, Ksp.notebook. Ksp = [Li + ] [F + ] Find the Ksp for the above reaction.

Removal of vanadium from neutralized acid mine drainage (AMD) by adsorption to saw dust

LBL Radionuclide Solubility and Speciation Studies for the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project

Sample Questions Chem 22 Student Chapters Page 1 of 5 Spring 2016

URANIUM IN SOIL. Analytical Procedure (2 GRAM SAMPLE) 1. SCOPE

K.A. Terzi 1,2, I. Bountas 1,2 C.A. Aggelopoulos 1, C.D. Tsakiroglou 1

Removal Efficiency of Cesium and Strontium in Seawater by Zeolite Fixed-Bed Columns

THORIUM, PLUTONIUM, AND URANIUM IN WATER

Sorption of Uranium (VI) to Graphite under Potential Repository Conditions

Thallium Adsorption onto Illite

How many milliliters of 6.00M hydrochloric acid is needed to completely react with 25.0 g of sodium carbonate?

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY. Peggy A. O Day Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

Sorption of an oil sands naphthenic acid mixture to soils implication for transport in groundwater and aquatic toxicity

6. In which direction will the point of equilibrium shift when the pressure is increased in the following equilibrium?

HETEROGENEITY IN MONTMORILLONITE. JAMES L. MCATEE, JR. Baroid Division, National Lead Co., Houston, Texas

STUDIES ON THE SORPTION OF PHOSPHATE ON SOME SOILS OF INDIA SATURATED WITH DIFFERENT CATIONS

QUESTIONSHEETS GROUPS 1 AND 2 REACTIONS OF THE ELEMENTS WITH WATER REACTIONS OF THE ELEMENTS WITH DILUTE ACIDS

Properties of Solutions Use section 15 and your textbook glossary to complete this worksheet

TECHNETIUM-99 IN SOIL

Use of ion-exchange composites based on natural zeolites for cleaning of water solutions with purpose to create environmentally safe technologies

Lecture 14: Cation Exchange and Surface Charging

organisms CaCO 3 + H 2 O + CO 2 shallow water

REMEDIATION OF SALT IMPACTED GROUNDWATER WITH ELECTROKINETICS. Paper by: Sean Kelly, Rick Churko, Sean Frisky, Anjum Mullick, Stuart Torr.

A Comparison of EPA Method and ASTM D6239 for Uranium in Hard Water Matrices. Robert L. Metzger & Pierre Pouquette

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Lab 8 Dynamic Soil Systems I: Soil ph and Liming

FIU s Support for Groundwater Remediation at SRS F/H Area

THE USE OF ORGANOCLAY IN MANAGING DISSOLVED ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS RELEVANT TO CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS

During photosynthesis, plants convert carbon dioxide and water into glucose (C 6 H 12 O 6 ) according to the reaction:

Priority Pollutants in Untreated and Treated Discharges from Coal Mines


Shake-and-Shoot : A Rapid Solvent Extraction Process for PCBs and TPH 11375

WM2016 Conference, March 6 10, 2016, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Preparation and characterisation of a sorbent suitable for technetium separation from environmental matrices

Batch Adsorption Test of Phenol on Soils

Name Hour. Acids, Bases, Salts and Neutralization. Practice Test A

REMOVAL OF ARSENIC, CHROMIUM AND LEAD FROM SIMULATED GROUNDWATER WITH REACTIVE NANOSCALE IRON PARTICLES

Te-Norm in Phosphogypsum; Characterization and Treatment

Potential Impacts of Tailings and Tailings Cover. Fertilization on Arsenic Mobility in Surface and. Ground Waters

Microorganisms. Dissolved inorganics. Native vs. Introduced; Oligotrophic vs. Eutrophic Millions to billions per ml or g Complex consortia

(4) Give an example of important reactions that are responsible for the composition of river water.

Chapter 02 The Basics of Life: Chemistry

Surface Complexation.

Lecture 15: Adsorption; Soil Acidity

Uranium from water sample

Chemistry 265 December Exam 2011 Smith-Palmer

Contact Person(s) : Anna Berne APPLICATION

C. Perform the following calculations and Round into correct scientific notation.

Chapter 19. Solubility and Simultaneous Equilibria p

Stoichiometry: Chemical Calculations. Chemistry is concerned with the properties and the interchange of matter by reaction i.e. structure and change.

JOHN BURKE HIGH SCHOOL

NSS Chemistry Part 2 The Microscopic World I HKCEE Past Paper Questions Structural Questions

MOCK FINALS APPCHEN QUESTIONS

Semester 1 Review Chemistry

Ch : Electrochemistry and Radiochemistry AP Review Questions

Unit 4a: Solution Stoichiometry Last revised: October 19, 2011 If you are not part of the solution you are the precipitate.

We will not cover solution stoichiometry on Exam 1.

Adsorption Studies of Cyanide (CN) - on Alumina

Lab 3: How Do You Make an Antacid??

Rapid Analytical Methods for Determination of Actinides

STUDIES ON THE REMOVAL OF CATIONIC DYES FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION BY MIXED ADSORBENTS

TREATMENT OF URANIUM &THORIUM BEARING NITRATE EFFLUENT

Arsenic and Other Trace Elements in Groundwater in the Southern San Joaquin Valley of California

Alfonso Mucci and Anthony Williams-Jones Frank Dawson Adams (FDA)- 201/317

Chemistry FINAL: CONTENT Review Packet

Recall, that water is amphoteric. That is, it can act as both an acid and a base.


Settling? Filterable? Tyndall Effect? * 1 N N Y nm

APCH 231 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PRECIPITATION TITRATIONS

49 56 (8 Q's) Solutions YOU WILL SKIP THIS SECTION ENTIRELY (8 Q's) Organic Chemistry 12 none

Transcription:

EXTRAPOLATION STUDIES ON ADSORPTION OF THORIUM AND URANIUM AT DIFFERENT SOLUTION COMPOSITIONS ON SOIL SEDIMENTS Syed Hakimi Sakuma Malaysian Institute for Nuclear Technology Research (MINT), Bangi, 43000 Kajang, Malaysia Study on adsorption of Thorium and Uranium radionuclides by a soil sediment as a function of ionic composition of Ca, Mg and Na has been conducted. Experimentally conducted determined slopes representing an average of adsorption on soil sediments having different relative affinities for thorium, uranium, calcium and magnesium. Both thorium and uranium were found to be adsorbed to ion-exchange sites with calcium and magnesium cations as effective competitors An extrapolated equation for distribution coefficient K d was formed for each radionuclide thorium and uranium at the specified site where the soil sediments were sampled. INTRODUCTION There is a need for appropriate management of the disposal of low level radioactive wastes containing thorium and uranium. Adsorption studies are needed to estimate the rate of transport of thorium and uranium in the event of groundwater since there is a potential for contamination of drinking water. Information on adsorption mechanisms of thorium and uranium helps to understand controls on both radionuclides concentrations in groundwater, and to predict the risk of thorium and uranium release in leachates from mining activity and radioactive wastes. Thorium is found in nature as a tetravalent cation. The element usually occurs in geologic materials as a trace constituent in solid solution in phosphate, oxide and silicate minerals, and sorbed onto clays and other colloids. 1 Previous studies shows that equilibrium adsorpton of thorium by hydrous oxides goethite (α-feooh) and - MnO 2 in marine electrolytes is not affected by the major cations of Ca (2+) and Mg (2+), relative to NaCl electrolyte, while SO 4 decreased adsorption through competitive ion pairing with thorium in solution. 2 Studies were also conducted on the effects of ph, ionic strength and carbonate alkalinity on thorium adsorption by goethite in 0.1 M NaNO 3 electrolyte. 3 Dissolved thorium is almost invariably complexed in natural water. This increases the solubility of thorium bearing heavy minerals below ph 8. 4 The purpose of the present study is to examine the competitive effect of calcium and magnesium cations on thorium and uranium adsorption by laboratory experiments. The results and K d values calculated through equations described below make it possible to understand trends in concentrations of thorium and uranium in groundwater at disposal sites.

EXPERIMENTAL A series of batch adsorption experiments have been conducted to determine the thorium and uranium adsorption properties of soil sediments as a function of equilibrating solution composition. 5-8 Experiments were conducted using soil sediments near a potential disposal site. For experiment using thorium, eight (8) stock solutions of 500 ml were prepared with the concentrations of the major cations Ca, Mg and Na varying in the range 0.0 to 6.24 x 10-4 M, 0.0 to 2.50 x 10-4 M, and 0.0 to 1.65 x 10-4 M, respectively, (Table 1). The compositions of 9 stock solutions using uranium are listed in Table 2. The respective concentrations of the major cations Ca, Mg, Na are between 0.0 to 6.24 x 10-4 M, 0.0 to 2.5 x 10-4 M, and 0.0 1.65 x 10-4 M, respectively. All of the solutions were spiked with the tracers respectively and the ph of each stock solution was adjusted to 6.70-7.00 with sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid. Each batch experiment was conducted in a 40 ml polycarbonate centrifuge tube. One (1) gram of the soil sediments were added into their respective tubes. Twenty (20) ml of spiked solution was then added into each tube. All the tubes were equilibrated for 14 days after being shaken at room temperature. After the equilibration period, all the tubes were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 1 hours to separate the solid and the solution. Solution samples were filtered through a 0.2 µm. filter and then 1.0 ml were collected. It was then acidified by adding approximately 100 µl of concentrated hydrochloric acid or nitric acid (6 M or 12 M) and then analysed for concentration of thorium and uranium by the neutron activation method. Solid sediments were removed from each tube by filtering through a 0.45 µm. filter and then the sediments were allowed to dry. The solid sediments were also analysed by the neutron activation method. The distribution coefficient K d Th, U was calculated by : µg/g (ppm) (Th, U) in solid form K d Th, U = µg/ml (ppm) (Th, U) in liquid form Ionic strength which measures the total concentration of charge in a solution was calculated by: I = 0.5 Σ [m i ]z i 2 where m i was the molality or concentration (m) of the ith species of charge z i. 9 The ionic strength parameter (I) was used to calculate the activity coefficient of each solution. At higher concentrations less than 0.5 M, the Davies equation was used to calculate activity coefficient γ, as this has been shown to better represent experimental data than other equations to be found in the literature. 10-11 Thus the activity coefficient γ was calculated as: ln γ i = -1.17 z i 2 [( I)/(1+ I) - 0.2I] and activity was calculated by use of the expression: Activity (moles) = concentration (moles) x activity coefficient γ Detailed statistical regression and variance analyses were performed for each batch experiment to yield values for the adsorption coefficient K d.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION K d Th, U values for thorium and uranium were obtained for each of the batch experiments after examining adsorption of thorium and uranium on the soil sediments at different solution composition. Table 1 and Table 2 shows the final ph of the solutions at the end of the equilibration period. Experimental results proved to be reproducible and could be used with confidence to produce the K d equations for the soil sediments. Figure 1 and Figure 2, show K d values as a function of the sum of the equilibrium calcium and magnesium concentrations in solution for the soil sediments adsorption of thorium and uranium, respectively. From both Figures, thorium K d Th values shows very high values compared to those for uranium. The results indicated that the soil sediments or some individual minerals components of the sediment selectively adsorbed thorium more than the uranium radionuclides. Table 3 lists the adsorption coefficient K d for soil sediments described by the associated best fit equations. Figure 1 and Figure 2, show that good linear correlations exist where the predicted data were used to calculate the associated best fit equations. Table 3. Adsorption coefficient K d Th, U equations for soil sediments Radionuclide Adsorption coefficient equation, log Kd R square Thorium -1.25532 ± 0.299612 log ( Ca + Mg ) + 1.823167 ± 0.906504 0.8 Uranium -0.19838 ± 0.051125 log ( Ca + Mg ) + 2.749482 ± 0.153223 0.7 From the high K d values obtained indicated that both thorium and uranium radionuclides were adsorbed by the sediments as a function of the sum of the equilibrium calcium and magnesium concentrations in solution. This also indicated that ion exchange does exist in the soil sediments. CONCLUSION Changes in groundwater chemistry can affect adsorption properties of thorium and uranium onto soil sediments. The competitive effects of calcium and magnesium cations on the adsorption of thorium and uranium has been shown. The combined cation concentration of calcium and magnesium in solution correlates linearly with the measured K d Th, U values. Thorium and uranium concentrations and major ion data can be obtained from a network of wells. Changes of the thorium and uranium concentrations with future major ion concentrations can be estimated if the aquifer material resembles the sedimentary material used in the experiments. The author is grateful for financial support and encouragement by IAEA and management of MINT, Bangi, Malaysia for their interest.

REFERENCES 1. E.A. BONDIETTI, Adsorption of plutonium (IV) and thorium (IV) by soil colloids (abstr.) Agron. Abstr, 1974 2. A.H. KEITH, J. H. DAVID and K. C. LEE, Equilibrium Adsorption of Thorium by Metal Oxides in Marine Electrolytes, Geochimca et Cosmochimica Acta Vol. 52, 1987, p. 627-636 3. D. L. BRIAN and W.M. JAMES, Solid/Solution Interaction: the Effect of Carbonate Alkalinity on Adsorbed Thorium, Geochimca et. Cosmochimica Acta Vol. 51, 1986, p. 243-250 4. L. DONALD and S.H. JANET, The Mobility of Thorium in Natural Waters at Low Temperatures, Geochimca et. Cosmochimica Acta Vol. 44, 1980, p. 1753-1766 5. Batch-Type Procedures for Estimating Soil Adsorption of Chemicals, Technical Resource Document EPA/530/SW-87/006-F, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 1992 6. N.C. BRADY, The Nature and Properties of Soils, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1990 7. H.S. SYED, Competitive Adsorption of Strontium-90 on Soil Sediments, Pure Clay Phases and Feldspar Minerals, Appl. Radiation Isotop, Vol. 46, No. 5, 1994, p. 287-292. 8. J.J.W. HIGGO, Review of Sorption Data Applicable to the Geological Environment of Interest for the Deep Disposal of ILW and LLW in the UK: Safety Studies, Nirex Radioactive Waste Disposal, NSS/R162, British Geological Survey, Nottingham, 1988 9. W. STUMN and J.J. MORGAN, Aquatic Chemistry, An Introduction Emphasizing Chemical Equilibria in Natural Waters, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980 10. K.B. KRAUSKOPF, Introduction to Geochemistry, McGraw-Hill International Series in the Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGraw- Hill Book Company, New York, 1979 11. D.K. NORDSTROM J.L. MUNOZ, Geochemical Thermodynamics, The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, California, 1985

Table 1. Experiment number and solution composition (molar concentration) using thorium ions Experiment Ca(NO 3 ) 2 4H 2 O Na 2 SO 4 NaCl MgCl.6H 2 Final ph No. O 1 0 0 0 0 6.79 2 0.000624 0 0 0 6.85 3 0 0.000165 0 0.0005 6.7 4 0.000624 0.000165 0 0.0005 6.75 5 0.000624 0.000165 0.000312 0.00025 6.8 6 0.00312 0 0.00156 0 6.85 7 0.00312 0.000823 0 0.0025 6.75 8 0.00156 0.000823 0.00156 0 6.86 Table 2. Experiment number and solution composition (molar concentration) using uranium ions Experiment Ca(NO 3 ) 2 4H 2 O Na 2 SO 4 NaCl MgCl.6H 2 Final ph No. O 1 0 0 0 0 6.6 2 0 0.000165 0 0.0005 6.9 3 0.000624 0.000165 0 0.0005 6.8 4 0.000624 0.000165 0.000312 0.00025 7.07 5 0.000624 0.0000823 0.000156 0 6.78 6 0.00312 0.000823 0 0.0025 6.7 7 0.00312 0.000823 0.00312 0 6.85 8 0.00156 0.000823 0.00156 0 6.88 9 0.00156 0.00165 0 0.00125 6.8

Sediments adsorption of Uranium 3.44 3.42 3.40 Log Kd (adsorption) 3.38 3.36 3.34 3.32 3.30 Y Predicted Y 3.28 3.26 3.24-3.40-3.30-3.20-3.10-3.00-2.90-2.80-2.70-2.60-2.50-2.40 Log (Ca + Mg) Fig 2. Kd values as a function of the sum of the equilibrium Ca and Mg concentrations in solution (mol/l) for soil sediments Sediments adsorption of Thorium Log Kd (adsorption) 6.50 6.30 6.10 5.90 5.70 5.50 5.30 5.10 4.90 4.70 4.50-3.50-3.40-3.30-3.20-3.10-3.00-2.90-2.80-2.70-2.60-2.50-2.40 Log (Ca + Mg) Y Predicted Y Fig 1. Kd values as a function of the sum of the equilibrium Ca and Mg concentrations in solution (mol/l) for sediments)