SRC software. Rock physics modelling tools for analyzing and predicting geophysical reservoir properties

Similar documents
A look into Gassmann s Equation

THE ROCK PHYSICS HANDBOOK

Sections Rock Physics Seminar Alejandra Rojas

Uncertainties in rock pore compressibility and effects on time lapse seismic modeling An application to Norne field

Geological Classification of Seismic-Inversion Data in the Doba Basin of Chad*

Some consideration about fluid substitution without shear wave velocity Fuyong Yan*, De-Hua Han, Rock Physics Lab, University of Houston

Reservoir properties inversion from AVO attributes

Evaluation of Rock Properties from Logs Affected by Deep Invasion A Case Study

Rock physics of a gas hydrate reservoir. Gas hydrates are solids composed of a hydrogen-bonded ROUND TABLE

Integrating rock physics and full elastic modeling for reservoir characterization Mosab Nasser and John B. Sinton*, Maersk Oil Houston Inc.

The elastic properties such as velocity, density, impedance,

P314 Anisotropic Elastic Modelling for Organic Shales

Practical Gassmann fluid substitution in sand/shale sequences

A new model for pore pressure prediction Fuyong Yan* and De-hua Han, Rock Physics Lab, University of Houston Keyin Ren, Nanhai West Corporation, CNOOC

Competing Effect of Pore Fluid and Texture -- Case Study

Rock Physics Modeling in Montney Tight Gas Play

The Stanford VI reservoir

Integrating rock physics modeling, prestack inversion and Bayesian classification. Brian Russell

Th LHR2 08 Towards an Effective Petroelastic Model for Simulator to Seismic Studies

Characterization of Heterogeneities in Carbonates Ravi Sharma* and Manika Prasad, Colorado School of Mines

RESEARCH PROPOSAL. Effects of scales and extracting methods on quantifying quality factor Q. Yi Shen

Shaly Sand Rock Physics Analysis and Seismic Inversion Implication

Rock Physics Perturbational Modeling: Carbonate case study, an intracratonic basin Northwest/Saharan Africa

Shear Wave Velocity Estimation Utilizing Wireline Logs for a Carbonate Reservoir, South-West Iran

Calibration of the petro-elastic model (PEM) for 4D seismic studies in multi-mineral rocks Amini, Hamed; Alvarez, Erick Raciel

GRAIN SORTING, POROSITY, AND ELASTICITY. Jack Dvorkin and Mario A. Gutierrez Geophysics Department, Stanford University ABSTRACT

Time-lapse seismic modelling for Pikes Peak field

Statistical Rock Physics

Use of Seismic and EM Data for Exploration, Appraisal and Reservoir Characterization

Effective Medium Theories Effective Medium Models

Downloaded 11/02/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at Summary.

C002 Petrophysical Seismic Inversion over an Offshore Carbonate Field

Hydrogeophysics - Seismics

Integration of Rock Physics Models in a Geostatistical Seismic Inversion for Reservoir Rock Properties

Velocity porosity relationships: Predictive velocity model for cemented sands composed of multiple mineral phases

IDENTIFYING PATCHY SATURATION FROM WELL LOGS Short Note. / K s. + K f., G Dry. = G / ρ, (2)

Measurement of elastic properties of kerogen Fuyong Yan, De-hua Han*, Rock Physics Lab, University of Houston

AFI (AVO Fluid Inversion)

Four-D seismic monitoring: Blackfoot reservoir feasibility

Generation of synthetic shear wave logs for multicomponent seismic interpretation

Reservoir Characteristics of a Quaternary Channel: Incorporating Rock Physics in Seismic and DC Resistivity Surveys

Feasibility study of time-lapse seismic monitoring of CO 2 sequestration

Integrating reservoir flow simulation with time-lapse seismic inversion in a heavy oil case study

Reservoir Rock Properties COPYRIGHT. Sources and Seals Porosity and Permeability. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

Summary. Simple model for kerogen maturity (Carcione, 2000)

Downloaded 11/20/12 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Velocity-porosity relationships, 1: Accurate velocity model for clean consolidated sandstones

Recent advances in application of AVO to carbonate reservoirs: case histories

Methane hydrate rock physics models for the Blake Outer Ridge

We apply a rock physics analysis to well log data from the North-East Gulf of Mexico

BPM37 Linking Basin Modeling with Seismic Attributes through Rock Physics

RP 2.6. SEG/Houston 2005 Annual Meeting 1521

Pressure and Compaction in the Rock Physics Space. Jack Dvorkin

SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting

Formation Evaluation: Logs and cores

Downloaded 08/30/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Rock physics and AVO applications in gas hydrate exploration

Key Laboratory of Geo-detection (China University of Geosciences, Beijing), Ministry of Education, Beijing , China

A Thesis. Presented to. the Faculty of the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. University of Houston. In Partial Fulfillment

Rock physics integration of CSEM and seismic data: a case study based on the Luva gas field.

SEG Houston 2009 International Exposition and Annual Meeting. that the project results can correctly interpreted.

Prediction of porosity and fluid in chalk from acoustic measurements. Summary. Lars Gommesen

McMAT 2007 Micromechanics of Materials Austin, Texas, June 3 7, 2007

Edinburgh Anisotropy Project, British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains

Sensitivity Analysis of Pre stack Seismic Inversion on Facies Classification using Statistical Rock Physics

B-31 Combining 4D seismic and reservoir

A010 MULTISCALE RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION USING

Seismic Velocity Dispersion and the Petrophysical Properties of Porous Media

The Weyburn Field in southeastern Saskatchewan,

Rock Physics of Organic Shale and Its Implication

Seismic reservoir and source-rock analysis using inverse rock-physics modeling: A Norwegian Sea demonstration

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE PETROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES VARIATIONS ON THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A CO2 STORAGE SITE. Juan E. Santos

Toward an Integrated and Realistic Interpretation of Continuous 4D Seismic Data for a CO 2 EOR and Sequestration Project

Role of Data Analysis in fixing parameters for petrophysics & rockphysics modeling for effective seismic reservoir characterization A case study

Geophysical model response in a shale gas

ROCK PHYSICS DIAGNOSTICS OF NORTH SEA SANDS: LINK BETWEEN MICROSTRUCTURE AND SEISMIC PROPERTIES ABSTRACT

Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion and Amplitude Versus Angle Modeling Reduces the Risk in Hydrocarbon Prospect Evaluation

VELOCITY MODELING TO DETERMINE PORE ASPECT RATIOS OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE. Kwon Taek Oh

Short Note. A simple derivation of the effective stress coefficient for seismic velocities in porous rocks. Boris Gurevich. n = 1 K 0 /K s, (4)

Researcher 2015;7(9)

RESERVOIR SEISMIC CHARACTERISATION OF THIN SANDS IN WEST SYBERIA

Improved Exploration, Appraisal and Production Monitoring with Multi-Transient EM Solutions

Partial Saturation Fluid Substitution with Partial Saturation

QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION

3D petrophysical modeling - 1-3D Petrophysical Modeling Usning Complex Seismic Attributes and Limited Well Log Data

PRM on Johan Sverdrup - an unique Opportunity. Force seminar 2017 Stavanger, Maximilian Schuberth

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

ROCK PHYSICS MODELING FOR LITHOLOGY PREDICTION USING HERTZ- MINDLIN THEORY

Cold production footprints of heavy oil on time-lapse seismology: Lloydminster field, Alberta

The Hangingstone steam-assisted gravity drainage

Seismic characterization of Montney shale formation using Passey s approach

AVO Attributes of a Deep Coal Seam

Fluid-property discrimination with AVO: A Biot-Gassmann perspective

Theoretical Approach in Vp/Vs Prediction from Rock Conductivity in Gas Saturating Shaly Sand

A E. SEG/San Antonio 2007 Annual Meeting. exp. a V. a V. Summary

Introduction. Theory. GEOHORIZONS December 2007/22. Summary

ATTENUATION CHARACTERISTICS OF SAUDI ARABIAN RESERVOIR SANDSTONE AND LIMESTONE CORES

Rock Physics & Formation Evaluation. Special Topic

Techniques for determining the structure and properties of permafrost

Rock Physics and Quantitative Wavelet Estimation. for Seismic Interpretation: Tertiary North Sea. R.W.Simm 1, S.Xu 2 and R.E.

Transcription:

SRC software Rock physics modelling tools for analyzing and predicting geophysical reservoir properties

Outline About SRC software. Introduction to rock modelling. Rock modelling program structure. Examples of rock physics analyses. Future developments. Examples of integrated modelling analyses.

About SRC software The SRC software contains methods and results obtained by the SRC scientists, both as integrated functionalities in the rock modelling environment of VelRock and as stand-alone programs. The SRC software is available to the SRC sponsors free of charge, released every year in Q4. The software can be downloaded directly from the protected area of the SRC web site.

Introduction to rock modelling V P = 2.6 km/s V S = 1.4 km/s ρ = 2.2 g/cm 3 minerals fluids porosity permeability : V P : P-velocity V S : S-velocity

Rock model parametrization Consider porous rocks as multi-component materials, e.g. a solid phase (matrix) and a fluid phase. Each component may be heterogeneous and a mixture of sub-components (mineralogy, fluid types, etc.). Rock models consists of parameters for: properties, shapes and orientations of each phase, phase interaction effects. Effective elastic properties of rocks are predicted by geophysical transformation theories.

Rock modelling program elements Rock component library. Default library of rock components (minerals, fluids, pore geometry, ). Tools for defining and mixing components. Rock model builder. Combine rock components with appropriate geophysical transformation theories to define rock models. Analysis and application tools. Log data analysis and predictions. Lab data analysis. 2D and 3D grid data predictions. Rock models for NORSAR-2D and 3D applications. Graphical presentation of data.

Rock component library Default library of rock components supplied with each installation. Tools for defining rock components. Solid phase, fluid phase, pore space and fluid geometry parameters. Solid builder for defining effective solid parameters. Scattering theories: self-consistent, differential effective medium. Fluid builder for defining effective fluid parameters. Batzle-Wang / Han and Batzle theories. Tools for mixing of rock components. Boundary methods: Reuss, Voigt, Hill, Hashin-Shtrikman.

Rock modelling strategies Choice of modelling strategy: Depend on the model limitations physical model vs theoretical model. Depend on a priori knowledge: statistical/empirical model implicit vs explicit model. Depend on effects to be modelled: porosity pore fluid properties pore space properties... Available models: Empirical/statistical relationships. Poroelastic equations: Biot-Gassmann approach. Scattering theories: first order approach (Kuster-Toksöz), self-consistent (SC) approach (Berrymann, Korringa), differential effective medium (DEM) approach. Hybrid theories. DEM + Biot-Gassmann

Graphical presentations Cross-plots of data samples, rock models, rock components, well log data, other data files on specific format. 0% clay 10% clay 20% clay Well log data plots. 2D grid data plotted as grid pixels, smooth colour shaded plots, contours VelRock creates plots on the CGM-format.

Examples of analyses involving VelRock Calibration of rock models for integration with seismic modelling studies (geophysical models), log data analysis, lab data analysis etc. Sensitivity analysis of reservoir properties using calibrated rock models and seismic modelling. Log data analysis, including S-wave log prediction, fluid substitution, correction for drilling mud invasion, prediction of derived properties, lithology analysis. Lab data analysis. Integrated rock physics and seismic modelling studies (1D, 2D and 3D), including effect of fluid and pressure changes during production, prediction of time-lapse responses, testing of reservoir hypotheses, etc.

Rock model calibration Input: A weighted combination of P-velocity, S-velocity and density information. Available porosity, lithology and fluid information. Unknowns, e.g. pore geometry, clay volume, fluid saturation... Output: Calibrated rock model components. Prediction of sensitivity. Prediction of properties under other conditions, e.g. fluid substitution...

Effect of fluid composition on P-velocity Gas Oil Brine Gas Oil Brine Gas Oil Brine Gas Oil Brine Gas Oil Brine Gas Oil Brine 4.35 De pt h ( k m) 4.60 Saturating fluid Saturating fluid Saturating fluid Saturating fluid Saturating fluid Saturating fluid 4.35 De pt h ( k m) 4.60 P-velocity P-velocity P-velocity P-velocity P-velocity P-velocity 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.7 3.2 3.7

Porosity and clay contents vs seismic velocities 0% clay 10% clay 20% clay

Effect of pore geometry on seismic velocities V P α c(α) 1.00 1.0 V S α c(α) 0.10 1.0 α c(α) 0.10 0.60 0.01 0.40

Influence of fluid geometry on seismic velocity P-velocity (km/s) Gas Oil

Rock physics modelling in a 4D modelling loop Seismic data Inversion Seismic modelling Geological model Rock physics Fluid flow simulations

Rock physics analysis using fluid simulations T 0 T 1 S g S g S g v P Z P

SRC software for rock modeling The SRC software is available to the SRC sponsors, is a fully operational stand-alone system for rock physics analyses, consists of additional program modules for special analyses, contains functionalities for rock model based data processing, contains pre-releases of selected methods developed in the SRC project, will only run on Sun Solaris systems, does not include any user support besides installation guidance. First SRC version of the SRC software will be available to the sponsors from the SRC website in Q4 2001. A new version will be available in Q4 every year.

Near future developments Improved well log data module, with Import / export of tabular ASCII data. Data editing and corrections. Rock model based data predictions, S-wave logs, fluid substitution, etc. Upscaling/homogenization. Adapted plotting abilities. Improved grid prediction module using rock physics constraints. Implementation of contact model and contact cement model.

Fluid substitution in well logs Brine saturated Oilsaturated Gas saturated

Effect of fluid geometry on log data Lithology Fluid composition Velocity (km/s) Acoustic impedance (10 6 kg/s*m 2 ) v S v P saturation Homogeneous saturation Patchy saturation Patchy saturation

Correction for drilling mud invasion in formation 0.16 km/s 0.08 g/cm 3

Crossplot of properties from different wells

Backus average upscaling Layered rock Effective rock λ >> h θ V(θ)=f(C 11,C 13,C 33,C 44,C 66,ρ)

Backus upscaling of well log data Vp Vs epsilon-5m-bac delta-5m-bac epsilon-10m-bac delta-10m-bac

Prediction of grid properties

Effect of fluid saturation models on fluid contacts Homogeneous gas/oil mixing Patchy gas/oil mixing

Contact cement model principle = Compressional modulus C = D B = Adapted from Dvorkin et al. (1999) Void concentration (porosity) A

Log data vs. contact cement model Well 5 Well 6 20% clay cement 20% clay cement 10% clay cement 10% clay cement 5% clay cement 5% clay cement 2% clay cement 2% clay cement 1% clay cement 1% clay cement

Integrated rock physics and seismic modelling Fluid simulations Seismic data Well log data Lab. data Geological model Mineralogy Integrated rock physics and seismic modelling Synthetic seismics

Integrated modelling with rock model in target Geophysical model Rock physics model P-velocity (km/s) P-velocity (km/s) Seismic response