Status of the VEPP-4M Collider

Similar documents
Operational Experience with HERA

Touschek polarimeter for beam energy measurement of VEPP-4M collider LNFSS-08 1 / 16

IHEP-BINP CEPC accelerator collaboration workshop Beam energy calibration without polarization

M. Biagini, LAL & INFN French-Ukrainian Workshop on the instrumentation developments for high energy physics LAL, November

STATUS OF BEPC AND PLAN OF BEPCII

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Super-c-tau factory in Novosibirsk (WP7)

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

BESIII Collaboration Meeting in Winter of 2015 BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

COHERENT DIPOLE SYNCHRO-BETATRON BEAM-BEAM MODES IN ASYMMETRIC RING COLLIDERS

First Collective Effects Measurements in NSLS-II A. Blednykh Accelerator Physicist, BNL/NSLS-II Sep , 2014

Raising intensity of the LHC beam in the SPS - longitudinal plane

e + e Factories M. Sullivan Presented at the Particle Accelerator Conference June 25-29, 2007 in Albuquerque, New Mexico e+e- Factories

BEPC AND THE FUTURE PROGRAM AT IHEP

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

BEAM TESTS OF THE LHC TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK SYSTEM

Impedance & Instabilities

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

Polarization studies for beam parameters of CEPC and FCCee

ELIC: A High Luminosity And Efficient Spin Manipulation Electron-Light Ion Collider Based At CEBAF

Beam-Based Measurement of Dynamical Characteristics in Nuclotron

Introduction to Collider Physics

BINP, Novosibirsk. Sergei Nikitin EPAC 06, Edinburgh

Simulation of the head-tail instability of colliding bunches

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

( ( )) + w ( ) 3 / 2

ELIC Design. Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators. Jefferson Lab. Second Electron-Ion Collider Workshop Jefferson Lab March 15-17, 2004

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

τ lepton mass measurement at BESIII

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Physics 598ACC Accelerators: Theory and Applications

III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

Implementation of Round Colliding Beams Concept at VEPP-2000

Transverse beam stability and Landau damping in hadron colliders

NEXT GENERATION B-FACTORIES

Sunday morning: Beam Dynamics Issues. Session highlights and outstanding questions. M. Pivi and D. Rubin ECLOUD10 October 8-12 Cornell University

Measurement and Compensation of Betatron Resonances at the CERN PS Booster Synchrotron

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 17 Jun 2014

BEAM - BEAM TAILS STUDY FOR DAΦNE. D. Shatilov (BINP), M. Zobov

DAΦNE upgrade with large Piwinski angle and Crab Waist scheme

Conceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

Index. Accelerator model 8 Adiabatic damping 32, 141 Air-bag model 338 Alternating explicit time scheme 112 Azimuthal modes, see Modes

SIMULATION STUDY FOR MEIC ELECTRON COOLING*

Low Emittance Machines

MEASURING AND CONTROLLING ENERGY SPREAD IN CEBAF

STATUS OF THE VEPP-2000 COLLIDER PROJECT

Beam Physics at SLAC. Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head. July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1

Lepton beam polarisation for the HERA experiments ZEUS and H1

CEPC and FCCee parameters from the viewpoint of the beam-beam and electron cloud effects. K. Ohmi (KEK) IAS-HEP, HKUST, Hong Kong Jan.

Issues of Electron Cooling

OTHER MEANS TO INCREASE THE SPS 25 ns PERFORMANCE TRANSVERSE PLANE

Electron cloud effects in KEKB and ILC

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Run2 Problem List (Bold-faced items are those the BP Department can work on) October 4, 2002

Statusreport. Status of the GSI accelerators for FRS operation. Jens Stadlmann (FAIR Synchrotrons)

RF System Calibration Using Beam Orbits at LEP

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

Electron Beam Polarimetry: Status and Prospects. DIS 2005, Madison, April 2005 E. Chudakov (JLab)

Studies of trapped modes in the new extraction septum of the CERN Proton Synchrotron

ELECTRON-POSITRON COLLIDERS AT NOVOSIBIRSK

Turn-by-Turn Beam Position Measurements at ANKA with LIBERA ELECTRON

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

Measurement of the e + e - π 0 γ cross section at SND

HIRFL STATUS AND HIRFL-CSR PROJECT IN LANZHOU

Status of linear collider designs:

Introduction to polarimetry at HERA

RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCE G.I. BUDKER INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS. S.A. Nikitin

Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling (LEReC)

Electron Cloud Induced Beam Dynamics at CesrTA. Kiran Sonnad

Measurement of e + e hadrons in Novosibirsk

Particle physics experiments

BEAM-BEAM EFFECTS IN RHIC

The 2015 erhic Ring-Ring Design. Christoph Montag Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory

HERA STATUS AND UPGRADE PLANS

Beam. RF antenna. RF cable

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

BEAM-BEAM SIMULATION STUDIES OF CESR-c AND OBSERVATIONS IN CESR

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

Status of Optics Design

CESR-c Status and Accelerator Physics

Matching of Siberian Snakes

ERL FACILITY AT CERN FOR APPLICATIONS

Development of reliable and sophisticated photo injector system and future plan

WG2 on ERL light sources CHESS & LEPP

FY04 Luminosity Plan. SAG Meeting September 22, 2003 Dave McGinnis

THRESHOLDS OF THE HEAD-TAIL INSTABILITY IN BUNCHES WITH SPACE CHARGE

Optics considerations for

Beam Dynamics. Gennady Stupakov. DOE High Energy Physics Review June 2-4, 2004

Advanced Design of the FAIR Storage Ring Complex

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Single Bunch Longitudinal Measurements of the Cornell Electron- Positron Storage Ring with the Superconducting RF Cavities *

Particle Accelerators

arxiv: v2 [physics.acc-ph] 18 Nov 2015

Aperture Measurements and Implications

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

Muon (g 2) at JPARC. Five to Ten Times Better than E821. B. Lee Roberts. Department of Physics Boston University BOSTON UNIVERSITY

CesrTA Status Report Mark Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration March 4, 2009 ESR

Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012 Low- alpha mode at SOLEIL 1

Transcription:

Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk The VEPP-4M lab http://v4.inp.nsk.su V. Smaluk for the VEPP-4 4 team Russian Conference on Charged Particle Accelerators Novosibirsk September, 10-14 14 2006

Contents High-energy physics experiments Energy spread measurement Beam energy measurement and stability Temperature monitoring system Thermostabilization systems Fast transverse feedback

HEP: τ-lepton lepton mass measurement Precise measurement of the τ-lepton mass at the producing threshold is the principal high-energy physics experiment at the VEPP-4M KEDR facility. The τ-lepton mass is used to test the lepton universality principle which is one of the postulates of the Standard Model Preliminary result of the 2005-2006 runs: M τ = 1776.74 + 0.45 0.35 ± 0.07 MeV

HEP: experiments to improve measurement accuracy of the ψ(2s) and ψ(3770) mesons Precise measurements of the J/ψ and ψ(2s) meson masses provide the energy scale in the range around 3 GeV which is a basis for accurate determination of masses for all charmed particles. These measurements are also important for the accurate determination of the τ-lepton mass. M M ψ (2S) ψ (3770) = = 3686.117 ± 0.012 ± 0.015 3773.5 ± 0.9 ± 0.6 MeV MeV 3 times improved 2 times improved There are only 5 masses (e, p, n, μ, π) measured with higher accuracy

Distribution of the operation time 2005 Operation time of the VEPP-4M facility scheduled shutdown maintenance 14.5% repair 31.9% 16.1% 3.0% 8.0% 0.4% 26.1% injector + VEPP-3 SR experiments machine physics HEP experiments

Distribution of the operation time 400 350 300 HEP experiments accelerator 1998 2006 250 200 150 100 50 0 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 12-hour shifts

Luminosity integral 2004 2006 2004 1.75 pb 1 2005 4.51 pb 1 2006 5.03 pb 1 Total 11.28 pb 1

Average luminosity 2004 2006 Maximal peak luminosity of 2.1 10 30 cm 2 s 1 was achieved

Machine performance improvement нб -1 120 100 80 60 40 Operators professional skill Average luminosity in HEP shifts 119.2 114.7 104.0 97.6 95.7 97.4 94.0102.0 92.3 86.6 92.2 84.7 83.1 77.7 57.2 79.7 Automatic luminosity adjustment Hardware modernization new interpolating digital-to-analog converters upgraded BPM front-end electronics new RF master oscillator 20 0 Богомягков Глуховченко, Тумайкин Журавлев Карнаев Квардаков Киселев Кремянская Мешков Морозов Нейфельд Никитин Пиминов Симонов Синяткин Смалюк Шатилов

Resonant depolarization high-precision periodic calibration V.Smaluk for the VEPP-4 4 team Energy measurement resonant depolarization We have managed to increase the polarization lifetime near the strong spin resonance ν=4 from 10-20 minutes up to 1 hour Reliable energy calibration above and below the τ production threshold Time of spin relaxation, hours Psi tau Psi' ν=4 νx ν= 5 1550 1575 1600 1625 1650 1675 1700 1725 1750 1775 1800 1825 1850 1875 1900 E, MeV

Energy measurement Compton back-scattering Compton back-scattering routine energy monitoring during HEP experiment runs Mean energy and energy spread measurements E ΔE/E

Energy measurement 1-week energy monitoring during ψ(3770) scan

Energy spread measurement More details in the report: V.A. Kiselev, O.I. Meshkov, V.V. Smaluk, A.N. Zhuravlev Beam Energy Spread Measurement at the VEPP-4M Electron-Positron Collider In the experiment of the τ-lepton mass measurement, it is important to know beam energy spread for evaluation of its contribution into the total systematic error. Measurement methods: ψ meson scan high precision but time-consuming procedure can not be repeated frequently Compton back-scattering routine monitoring, but accuracy is now 15-20% Additional measurements required Analysis of chromatic synchro-betatron harmonics of coherent betatron oscillation Method I: measurement of amplitude ratio of synchrotron satellites to the main betatron peak in dependence of chromaticity [ T.Nakamura et al., Chromaticity for energy spread measurement and for cure of transverse multi-bunch instability in the SPRING-8 storage ring, Proc. of PAC-2001, Chicago, 2001 ] Method II: fitting the measured oscillation envelope with the theoretical curve [N.A.Vinokurov et al., The influence of chromaticity and cubic nonlinearity on kinematics of betatron oscillations, BINP preprint 76-87, Novosibirsk, 1976 (in Russian) ] Method III: measurement of current dependence of the energy spread using measured bunch lengthening and grows of the horizontal bunch size

Energy spread measurement More details in the report: V.A. Kiselev, O.I. Meshkov, V.V. Smaluk, A.N. Zhuravlev Beam Energy Spread Measurement at the VEPP-4M Electron-Positron Collider Method I: 2 x 1 2 2 2 y Rm ( y) = J ( x) e xdx 2 m y 0 ω β α ω0c y = + ωs ωs Method II: 2 ( ) exp t A t 2τ where τ Method III: ω 2 y δ β = 2 2 y a E 2 exp ωβ σ E E ωs 1 b σ 540 σ x [mkm] 530 520 510 ( 1 cos( ω t )), s PNT4 mode I 0 [ma] 500 0 1 2 3 4 5

New temperature monitoring system More details in the report: V.Kaplin, S.Karnaev, A. Kvashnin, I.Morozov, O.Plotnikova, Precise Temperature Measurement System of the VEPP-4M Electron-positron Collider (poster 42) Goals: For the VEPP-4M beam energy estimation, it is necessary to measure precisely the temperature of the magnets, because the most important factor perturbing beam energy is the temperature of the dipoles (up to 80 kev/deg). For thermostabilization of the VEPP-4M magnets. To control the RF cavities temperature, because the RF cavities thermal expansion results in excitation of unstable longitudinal beams oscillations. Hardware: High-Precision Digital Thermometers DS1631 with the resolution of 0.0625 o C and absolute accuracy of 0.5 o C in the 0 70 o C temperature range. 32-channel controller developed in BINP: automatic scanning of the temperature sensors every second and data writing to the internal memory; relay interlock function to prevent overheat is also implemented. Software: Control program running in PC reads data from the all controllers and writes it to PostgreSQL database once per minute. Motif-based GUI is also developed.

New temperature monitoring system More details in the report: V.Kaplin, S.Karnaev, A. Kvashnin, I.Morozov, O.Plotnikova, Precise Temperature Measurement System of the VEPP-4M Electron-positron Collider (poster 42) Cooling water temperature during 2.5 months (red out-stream, black in-stream) Temperature of the N5F magnet during 2 months

Thermostabilization of the Magnets Measured diurnal variations of the VEPP-4M beam energy. Main factor - temperature variations of the VEPP-4M magnets. Perturbing factors: ambient temperature, atmospheric humidity, conditions in a cooling tower, etc. Double-loop water cooling system High-precision thermal sensors Computer-controlled valve Control program

Thermostabilization of the Magnets Thermostabilization OFF Thermostabilization ON

Thermostabilization of the RF cavities More details in the report: E.G.Miginskaya, I.I.Morozov, V.M.Tsukanov, A.A.Volkov, Temperature stabilization of RF-cavities of the VEPP-4M Electron-Positron Facility (poster 50) Unstable phase oscillation occurs due to parasitic high-order modes of the VEPP-4M RF cavities. This instability is one of the main efficiency decreasing factors, because it reduces luminosity drastically. High-amplitude phase oscillation leads to particle loss and can be dangerous for the KEDR detector. RF cavity temperature variation results in the cavity deformation and then leads to a shift of working conditions away from the stability regions.

Thermostabilization of the RF cavities More details in the report: E.G.Miginskaya, I.I.Morozov, V.M.Tsukanov, A.A.Volkov, Temperature stabilization of RF-cavities of the VEPP-4M Electron-Positron Facility (poster 50) 22 Thermostabilization OFF, Δt=2 o C 21,5 Temperature is measured by thermo-sensors with a sensitivity of 10 mv/ o C. For each RF cavity, 5 kw flowing water heater is switched on/off by controllable electronic switches. Temperature analysis and power control is provided by a microcontroller. 19 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 T, degree T, degree 21 20,5 20 19,5 25,1 25,08 25,06 25,04 25,02 25 24,98 24,96 24,94 24,92 Time (s) Thermostabilization ON, Δt=0.5 o C 24,9 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Time (s)

Fast Transverse Feedback More details in the report: V. Cherepanov, E. Dementev, A. Medvedko, V. Smaluk, D. Sukhanov, The VEPP4-M transverse bunch-by-bunch feedback system (poster 43) Maximal bunch current in the VEPP-4M collider is limited by TMCI. At the 1850 MeV energy, threshold current is about 10 ma. Head-tail instability positive chromaticity: 0-th oscillation mode (center of mass) is stable, other unstable; negative chromaticity: center of mass is unstable, other modes stable. The idea is to suppress 0-th oscillation mode using resistive feedback, while to keep other modes stable due to negative chromaticity. Calculation based on the hollow-beam model shows that it is possible to exceed the instability threshold 3-5 times. Transverse bunch-by-bunch feedback Energy 1.8 5.2 GeV Upper frequency limit 20 MHz Number of bunches 2 x 2 ADC/DAC digit capacity 12 Bunch current 40 ma DSP TMS320C6713 Number of kickers 4 processor frequency 225 MHz RF power per kicker 400 W memory 2Mx32b

Fast Transverse Feedback More details in the report: V. Cherepanov, E. Dementev, A. Medvedko, V. Smaluk, D. Sukhanov, The VEPP4-M transverse bunch-by-bunch feedback system (poster 43)

Fast Transverse Feedback More details in the report: V. Cherepanov, E. Dementev, A. Medvedko, V. Smaluk, D. Sukhanov, The VEPP4-M transverse bunch-by-bunch feedback system (poster 43) Sensitivity: beam current 40 mka kick amplitude 0.5 kv Betatron oscillation beam current 2.8 ma kick amplitude 1.0 kv

References V.A. Kiselev, O.I. Meshkov, V.V. Smaluk, A.N. Zhuravlev, Beam Energy Spread Measurement at the VEPP-4M Electron-Positron Collider V.Kaplin, S.Karnaev, A. Kvashnin, I.Morozov, O.Plotnikova, Precise Temperature Measurement System of the VEPP-4M Electron-positron Collider (poster 42) E.G.Miginskaya, I.I.Morozov, V.M.Tsukanov, A.A.Volkov, Temperature stabilization of RF-cavities of the VEPP-4M Electron-Positron Facility (poster 50) V. Cherepanov, E. Dementev, A. Medvedko, V. Smaluk, D. Sukhanov, The VEPP4-M transverse bunch-by-bunch feedback system (poster 43)