Council conclusions on Arctic issues. 2985th FOREIGN AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 8 December 2009

Similar documents
CONFERENCE STATEMENT

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

Policy framework The Netherlands and the Polar Regions, Summary and priorities

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Dr. Steven Lamy Sophie Cottle

EU s Role IN THE ARCTIC

Third Annual Climate Science and Policy Conference, UC Santa Cruz: Earth s Climate Future: Unchartered Territory

European Parliament resolution of 12 March 2014 on the EU strategy for the Arctic (2013/2595(RSP))

Natura 2000 in the marine environment: state of implementation and next steps

Iceland and the Arctic: The Politics of Territoriality. Valur Ingimundaron Professor of Contemporary History, University of Iceland

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

The importance of international university and project cooperation in science

PROGRAM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE ARCTIC COUNCIL IN

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

Norway s Integrated Ocean Management (IOM) Policies and Plans - A Brief Presentation

Germany s Arctic policy guidelines. Assume responsibility, seize opportunities.

Stewardship of the Central Arctic Ocean: The Arctic 5 versus the international community

A Parliamentary Resolution on Iceland's Arctic Policy

The Future of International Institutional Arrangements in the Arctic: Foggy Horizons, Sea of Challenges

The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan and Marine Spatial Planning

REPORT. EN United in diversity EN A7-0377/ on a sustainable EU policy for the High North (2009/2214(INI)) Committee on Foreign Affairs

The Changing Arctic: Strategic Opportunities and Challenges

SEMINAR: ITALIAN-FINNISH COOPERATION IN THE ARCTIC: A GREAT OPPORTUNITY

Polar complications in the law of the sea: A case study of the regime for research and survey activities in the Arctic Ocean

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

ARCTIC FISHERIES: GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Norwegian MFA Jonas Gahr Støres welcoming remarks at the Sixth Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council, Tromsø, 29 April 2009

PACIFIC ISLANDS REGIONAL OCEAN POLICY. A healthy Ocean that sustains the livelihoods and aspirations of Pacific Island communities.

The Place of Joint Development in the Sustainable Arctic Governance

World Oceans Day 2010 Our oceans: opportunities and challenges

Outline National legislative & policy context Regional history with ESSIM ESSIM Evaluation Phase Government Integration via RCCOM Regional ICOM Framew

NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE ARCTIC REGION

J O I N T P A R L I A M E N T A R Y C O M M I T T E E

xxv PART I THE DIVIDED OCEANS: INTERNATIONAL LAW GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL ZONES 1

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

Maritime Spatial Planning: Transboundary Cooperation in the Celtic Seas Looking Ahead

FINDINGS OF THE ARCTIC METEOROLOGY SUMMIT

STUDY GUIDE. PAME - Working Group

DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE NORTH. Results achieved during

Northern Dimension Partnership on Transport and Logistics

Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region, transnational and project perspective Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat

Offshore Energy and Maritime Spatial Planning in the German EEZ

Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

Indian Council of World Affairs Sapru House, Barakhambha Road New Delhi. Policy Brief. The Arctic Council: Is There a Case for India

FINLAND, A COOL ARCTIC COUNTRY WITH SNOW-HOW

1. Baltic SCOPE Towards coherence and cross-border solutions in Baltic Maritime Spatial Plans

Linking Global and Regional Levels in the Management of Marine Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

China's Arctic Policy The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China. January 2018 First Edition 2018

Baltic Sea Region cooperation in Maritime Spatial Planning - HELCOM/VASAB

MR. George ALEXAKIS, parallel session 3. "Mediterranean Sea Region. laying the conditions. for sustainable growth and jobs"

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP): A practical approach to ecosystembased

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /14 CULT 68

**** Mr Speaker, Esteemed Parliamentarians, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

The view of Europaforum Northern Sweden concerning the future of EU cohesion policy

Space for the Arctic

OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2228(INI) of the Committee on Fisheries

The Arctic Council - 20 years Anniversary

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY ON BIOSPHERE RESERVES

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Second Committee (A/67/440/Add.2)]

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

Japan s Arctic Policy

OPINION. Results of EU Structural Policy in NSPA

AND REGIONAL PROJECTS

National Perspectives - Portugal. Margarida Almodovar

Greenland: Balancing the need for development and environmental protection. Arctic Frontiers 2016 Industry and Environment

Carpathians Unite mechanism of consultation and cooperation for implementation of the Carpathian Convention

DRAFT PROGRAM Registration of participants, welcome coffee, exhibition tour

Ocean governance in Samoa: A case study of ocean governance in the South Pacific

Exploring Common solutions - Finland's Chairmanship Program for the Arctic Council

NOAA Nautical Charts and Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning. Meredith Westington Chief Geographer NOAA/NOS/Office of Coast Survey

ANNEX 5 IQALUIT 2015 SAO REPORT TO MINISTERS

Margarita Stancheva Hristo Stanchev & Robert Young 2. MEDCOAST JUBILEE WORKSHOP May 2015, Iberotel Sarigerme Park, Dalaman, Turkey

National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security Presidential Directive

Japan s Arctic Policy

Country Fiche Lithuania

KUNMING FORUM ON UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CITIES OF THE FUTURE: SMART, RESILIENT

SYKE Finnish Environment Institute Marine Research Centre Paula Kankaanpää, Director

Briefing. H.E. Mr. Gyan Chandra Acharya

Opening speech at the Fifth Conference of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region

Arctic Spatial Data Infrastructure Enabling Access to Arctic Location-Based Information

CANADIAN HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICE & OCEANOGRAPHIC SERVICES

Shetland Islands Council

Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning Andrej Abramić

OUR COASTAL FUTURES. A Strategy for the Sustainable Development of the World s Coasts.

MSP Process drawings and descriptions

Third Cohesion report February 2004

16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

Pacific Oceanscape Vision:

Mediterranean Sea and Territorial Development, Opportunities and Risks

Ocean Governance and the Japanese Basic Act on Ocean Policy

The Chairmanship Brand

Country Fiche Sweden Updated May 2018

Resolution XIII.23. Wetlands in the Arctic and sub-arctic

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

Maritime Spatial Planning Framework Directive Supported by INSPIRE

The EU Arctic Cluster

BASICS OF THE STATE POLICY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE ARCTIC FOR THE PERIOD TILL 2020 AND FOR A FURTHER PERSPECTIVE. I. General provisions

Economic and Social Council

ARCTIC SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE

ICZM and MSP in the Black Sea Region

Transcription:

COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO EN Council conclusions on Arctic issues 2985th FOREIGN AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 8 December 2009 The Council adopted the following conclusions: The Council recalls its conclusions of 8 December, 2008, that welcomed the Commission Communication of 20 November, 2008, on the European Union and the Arctic region. The Council welcomes the gradual formulation of a policy on Arctic issues to address EU interests and responsibilities, while recognising Member States legitimate interests and rights in the Arctic. The Council considers that an EU policy on Arctic issues should be based on: Effective implementation by the international community of adequate measures to mitigate climate change that are required to preserve the unique characteristics of the Arctic region; Reinforced multilateral governance through strengthening and consistent implementation of relevant international, regional and bilateral agreements, frameworks and arrangements; The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and other relevant international instruments; Formulating and implementing EU actions and policies that impact on the Arctic with respect for its unique characteristics, in particular the sensitivities of ecosystems and their biodiversity as well as the needs and rights of Arctic residents, including the indigenous peoples; Maintaining the Arctic as an area of peace and stability and highlighting the need for responsible, sustainable and cautious action in view of new possibilities for transport, natural resource extraction and other entrepreneurial activities linked to melting sea ice and other climate change effects. P R E S S R u e d e l a L o i 1 7 5 B 1 0 4 8 B R U S S E L S T e l. : + 3 2 ( 0 ) 2 2 8 1 8 2 3 9 / 6 3 1 9 F a x : + 3 2 ( 0 ) 2 2 8 1 8 0 2 6 press.office@consilium.europa.eu http://www.consilium.europa.eu/newsroom 1

Conscious of the need for further work, the Council approves the three main policy objectives proposed by the Commission: Protecting and preserving the Arctic in unison with its population; Promoting sustainable use of natural resources; Contributing to enhanced governance in the Arctic through implementation of relevant agreements, frameworks and arrangements, and their further development. * * * In order to take a next step towards the formulation of an overarching approach to EU policy on Arctic issues: 1. The Council recognises the particular vulnerability of the Arctic region and its crucial importance to the world climate system. The Council sees a need to give increased attention to the impact of climate change in the Arctic within the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations. It also supports action by appropriate international bodies, such as the Arctic Council, World Meteorological Organization (WMO), and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), to enhance observation, monitoring and research, as well as to reduce the effects of emissions of green house gases, black carbon and other short lived climate forcers in the Arctic. 2. The Council recognises that EU policies on natural resource management that impact on the Arctic should be formulated in close dialogue with Arctic states and local communities and take into account the importance of sustainable management of all natural resources in that region. 3. The Council underlines the importance of supporting sustainable development for indigenous peoples, including on the basis of their traditional means of livelihood, and welcomes the Commission proposal to engage in a broad dialogue with Arctic indigenous peoples on the basis of respect for the rights of the indigenous peoples. 4. The Council supports expanded use of strategic environmental impact assessments, as well as improved monitoring and planning of proposed activities in order to protect sensitive Arctic areas. The Council welcomes commitments and efforts of the Arctic states to develop joint approaches and best practices for minimising negative environmental impacts of exploitation and use of natural resources in the Arctic as well as promotion of energy efficiency and renewable energy. The Council invites the Commission and Member States to examine the possibilities to endorse the revised Arctic Council Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines of 2009. 5. In connection with the International Year of Biodiversity 2010, the Council invites Member States and the Commission to support efforts to protect Arctic ecosystems and their biodiversity, particularly by considering measures for protection of biodiversity in the high seas and by encouraging Arctic states to develop marine protected areas (MPAs) on an individual or a cooperative basis. The Council encourages Member States and the Commission together with the European Environment Agency (EEA) to contribute to the Arctic Council work on conducting an Arctic Biodiversity Assessment. 2

6. The Council calls for increased support for research on Arctic related issues, in particular to secure the legacy of the International Polar Year 2007-2008, and agrees that this should be adequately reflected in the work programmes of the Seventh Community Framework Programme for Scientific Research and in other community research and innovation activities. A systemic approach to Arctic research should cover aspects ranging from protecting the environment, including the role of the Arctic region as an important part of the Earth ecosystem, to the effects of climate change and natural resource exploitation on biodiversity, long range transport of hazardous chemicals, local communities and the sustained livelihood of indigenous peoples. 7. The Council realises that enhanced monitoring and surveillance capabilities together with the appropriate research infrastructure could contribute significantly to Arctic research. The EU should make best use of its existing research infrastructure and be open to the need to enhance and support these capabilities, which may include multifunctional research platforms including satellite based ones. Member States and the Commission are invited to provide appropriate resources, including research infrastructure, in a more coordinated way by jointly supporting monitoring of the effects of Arctic climate change and development of technologies that meet Arctic requirements. Access to research sites in the Arctic, as well as open access to reliable and coherent data and research results, should also be facilitated and further promoted, e.g. according to the guiding principles of the Shared Information and Observation System for Europe (SEIS) and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (EIONET). 8. The Council invites the Commission together with the EEA and with Member States to contribute towards assessing the state and outlook for the Arctic environment and to put forward possible initiatives to contribute to the Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks (SAON) process with a view to expand the scope and improve the coordination of observation and monitoring throughout the circumpolar Arctic. 9. The Council notes that the EU can play an important role in contributing to the reduction of hazardous pollution in the Arctic and invites the Commission to present a work plan for continued monitoring, research, restriction of use and destruction of hazardous chemicals released into and inside the Arctic or through long range transport. Member States and the Commission can reduce the EU share of persistent chemicals in the Arctic by making the use of such substances subject to restriction or authorisation pursuant to the EU chemicals legislation. According to the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) regulatory regime, priority of the authorization procedure should be given to substances with persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic properties. 10. The Council notes that in the implementation of the Integrated Maritime Policy special attention will be paid to the Arctic and underlines that harvesting of Arctic marine living resources should be managed on the basis of scientific advice as part of an ecosystem perspective. It stresses the need to promote a precautionary approach to new fishing activity in Arctic high seas, as well as measures for protecting marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The Council expresses its readiness to consider a proposal to put in place a regulatory framework for the part of the seas not yet covered by an international conservation system by extending the mandate of relevant Regional Fisheries Management Organisations or any other proposal to that effect agreed by the relevant parties. Until such a framework is in place, the Council favours a temporary ban on new fisheries in those waters. 3

11. Recalling the fundamental principle of the Integrated Maritime Policy that each sea region is unique and needs individual attention in balancing its uses in a sustainable manner, Member States are encouraged to contribute to strengthening the protection of the Arctic marine environment through their support for initiatives in the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and in other relevant organisations having an influence in the Arctic area, including those related to the management of fisheries as well as to the conservation and sustainable use of other marine living resources. 12. The Council welcomes and encourages the progress being made within IMO, in particular the amendment of the existing guidelines for ships operating in polar waters and the agreement to develop a new mandatory instrument for ships operating in polar waters. The Council recognises the important work on Arctic marine issues carried out by the Arctic Council, including the recent Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment (AMSA), and its recommendations on enhancing marine safety. 13. The Council stresses the importance that Member States in their capacity as flag, port and coastal states should continuously promote and monitor the full implementation and further improvement of existing rules on navigation, maritime safety and security, vessel routing systems and environmental standards derived from the applicable international conventions in the Arctic, in particular within the IMO framework. On matters of vessel traffic monitoring, the Council notes the usefulness of including the Arctic as far as possible in relevant international monitoring systems and in present and future navigation and communication satellite systems. 14. The Council underlines the need to further explore the options and consequences of exchanging Automatic Identification System (AIS) information with non-eu/europeans Economic Area Arctic states and to assess to what extent operational assistance in the field of pollution prevention and response can be extended to the Arctic area. To this end, the Council invites the Commission to examine, with the full support of the SafeSeaNet High Level Steering Group, the possible development of a policy of access rights to define the relations of SafeSeaNet with other information systems used by third countries. 15. The Council also invites Member States and the Commission to offer to work closely together with the Arctic states in order to reinforce the assistance that may be provided for search and rescue purposes and other emergencies and needs in the Arctic. 16. With respect to the gradual opening, in the years to come, of trans-oceanic Arctic routes for shipping and navigation, the Council reiterates the rights and obligations for flag, port and coastal states provided for in international law, including UNCLOS, in relation to freedom of navigation, the right of innocent passage and transit passage, and will monitor their observance. 17. The Council recognises the Arctic Council as the primary competent body for circumpolar regional cooperation and expresses its continued support for the applications by Italy and the Commission to become permanent observers in that body. The Council encourages Member States, and the Commission together with the EEA to continue to contribute to the work of relevant Arctic Council working groups. 4

18. The Council believes that the EU should actively seek consensus approaches to relevant Arctic issues through cooperation also with Arctic states and/or territories outside the EU, Canada, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, the Russian Federation and the United States, as well as with other relevant actors with Arctic interests. 19. The Council attaches great importance to the strong links between the EU and Greenland as well as the Arctic European Economic Area/EFTA countries, Iceland and Norway. Greenland has close historical and constitutional ties to Denmark and is part of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) association. The Council welcomes that a broader and more structured relationship with Greenland is being developed within the bilateral EU-Greenland Partnership, to further mutual interest and concrete areas of cooperation. 20. The Council notes that the Arctic is also one of the priority areas of the revised Northern Dimension policy, a common policy between the EU, Iceland, Norway and the Russian Federation. It encourages development of the ND Arctic Window without duplicating work within the mandates of the Arctic Council or the Barents Euro-Arctic Council. In particular, the Council notes that further consideration would be needed on how indigenous peoples could be included in the deliberations on the ND Arctic Window. 21. The Council supports the Barents cooperation as the suitable framework for cross-border cooperation in the High North of the European continent, and values the work of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council (BEAC), in which Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, the Russian Federation, Sweden and the Commission are members. It also welcomes follow-up on the conference Common Concern for the Arctic by the Nordic Council of Ministers. 22. The Council invites the Commission together with Member States to examine the merits of establishing an information centre on Arctic issues in the EU. The Council also agrees that the Commission should promote a permanent dialogue with NGOs on the state of the environment in the Arctic. 23. The Council requests the Commission to present a report on progress made in these areas by the end of June 2011. 5