September 2008 LGS Science Observing Plan 9/18/08 v1.1, A. Bouchez

Similar documents
LCO Global Telescope Network: Operations and policies for a time-domain facility. Todd Boroson

Keck Adaptive Optics Note #385. Feasibility of LGS AO observations in the vicinity of Jupiter. Stephan Kellner and Marcos van Dam

Keck Adaptive Optics Note 1069

High Redshift Universe

Multi-frequency. Observations Using REM at la Silla. Filippo Maria Zerbi INAF Osservatorio di Brera On behalf of the REM/ROSS team

IN REPORT: Plate Scale and FOV of CCD for Each Telescope using Albireo Stars

Why SOAR needs AO? Ground-Layer AO: YES (optical wavelengths, full sky coverage, SAM was built as a GLAO instrument. First laser light: Apr

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

SEQUENCING THE STARS

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LAB: Photometry of the Pleiades Cluster

Point Spread Functions. Aperture Photometry. Obs Tech Obs Tech 26 Sep 2017

The in-orbit wavelength calibration of the WFC G800L grism

Low Surface Brightness Observations of Galaxy Disk Truncation with Different Obliquities

Telescopes, Observatories, Data Collection

An Adaptive Autoguider using a Starlight Xpress SX Camera S. B. Foulkes, Westward, Ashperton, Nr. Ledbury, HR8 2RY. Abstract

CHAPTER 10 Techniques for Background Measurement and Mosaicing

1. Give short answers to the following questions. a. What limits the size of a corrected field of view in AO?

in formation Stars in motion Jessica R. Lu Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii

NICMOS Status and Plans

Chapter 5: Telescopes

Deep fields around bright stars ( Galaxies around Stars )

DRAFT DRAFT Comet 17P Holmes Outburst DRAFT DRAFT John Menke Updated January 13, 2008

Lab 1: Introduction to the sky and making telescopic observations with the CCD camera. AST 152M Lab Instructor: Greg Doppmann Due: Feb 11, 2000

The Effective Spectral Resolution of the WFC and HRC Grism

Water Ice on the Satellite of Kuiper Belt Object 2003 EL61

Star Formation Near Supermassive Black Holes

Goals of the meeting. Catch up with JWST news and developments: ERS and GO call for proposals are coming!!

What does the universe look like?

Lecture 8. October 25, 2017 Lab 5

Large Area Imaging Survey of Near-Infrared Sky with Korean Compact Space Telescopes

Image Acquisition Best Practices. Richard A. Bennion Ewell Observatory

HETDEX Overview. Hobby Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment. HETDEX is: HETDEX enables a lot of ancillary science. HETDEX Science Workshop Feb 09

Starlight in the university lab: Astrolab

NAOYUKI TAMURA Subaru Instrument Astronomer Subaru Telescope, NAOJ

Continuum Submillimetre Astronomy from UKIRT. Ian Robson UK ATC

Science with Micado. the high resolution camera for the E-ELT Renato Falomo. INAF Observatory of Padova, Italy. 25 February IASF, Milano

LGS AO at the W. M. Keck Observatory

Reaching Magnitude +16 with the Modified Video Drift Method

Measuring the evolution of the star formation rate efficiency of neutral atomic hydrogen gas from z ~1 4

Lab 4: Differential Photometry of an Extrasolar Planetary Transit

Objectives: My objective in last night s test was to visually compare how changing the focal ratio of a telescope impacts the following:

Lab 4 Radial Velocity Determination of Membership in Open Clusters

JWST Overheads. Jeff Valenti S&OC Mission Scientist

Keck/Subaru Exchange Program Subaru Users Meeting January 20, 2011

The HST Set of Absolute Standards for the 0.12 µm to 2.5 µm Spectral Range

Capturing and Processing Deep Space Images. Petros Pissias Eumetsat Astronomy Club 15/03/2018

Commissioning of the Hanle Autoguider

Keck laser guide star: Science case

According to the currents models of stellar life cycle, our sun will eventually become a. Chapter 34: Cosmology. Cosmology: How the Universe Works

Influence of moon light on tip-tilt sensing accuracy using STRAP

ASTR 1040: Stars & Galaxies

Searching for Other Worlds

Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)

Introduction to Telescopes Pre-lab

Open Cluster Photometry: Part II

Meter-Class Telescope Array Science

Notes on Third Meeting of NGAO Solar System, February 28, 2006

NEWFIRM Quick Guide for Proposal Preparation

Detection of Exoplanets by Amateur Astronomers

Infra-red imaging of perpendicular nested bars in spiral galaxies with the Infra-red Camera at the Carlos Sanchez Telescope

Finding Black Holes Left Behind by Single Stars

Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Iowa 29:137 Astronomical Laboratory Fall 2011 Lab 4: Stellar Spectroscopy

Auto-guiding System for CQUEAN

The Challenge of AZ Cas-Part 1. John Menke Barnesville, MD Abstract

PHY323:Lecture 7 Dark Matter with Gravitational Lensing

THE MILKY WAY GALAXY BACKGROUND READING FOR MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE

The Impact of x-cte in the WFC3/UVIS detector on Astrometry

Planets Around M-dwarfs Astrometric Detection and Orbit Characterization

Model SGS Dual CCD Self-Guiding Spectrograph

Imaging with SPIRIT Exposure Guide

Cross-Talk in the ACS WFC Detectors. I: Description of the Effect

Astronomical Research at the Center for Adaptive Optics. Sandra M. Faber, CfAO SACNAS Conference October 4, 2003

The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram and Stellar Evolution

AstroBITS: Open Cluster Project

Hubble's Law and the Age of the Universe

GEMINI 8-M Telescopes Project

The SKYGRID Project A Calibration Star Catalog for New Sensors. Stephen A. Gregory Boeing LTS. Tamara E. Payne Boeing LTS. John L. Africano Boeing LTS

Active Galaxies & Quasars

Assignment #0 Using Stellarium

Basic Properties of the Stars

Determining the Properties of the Stars

SN 2012im/2013ek: A Supernova Double Take in NGC 6984 Cycle: 21, Proposal Category: GO/DD (Availability Mode: SUPPORTED)

Quantifying the Assembly History of Elliptical Galaxies

3/18/14. Today on Stellar Explosions. Second Mid-Term Exam. Things to do SECOND MID-TERM EXAM. Making a millisecond pulsars spin it up!

5. A particular star has an angle of parallax of 0.2 arcsecond. What is the distance to this star? A) 50 pc B) 2 pc C) 5 pc D) 0.

Constellations of the Month Andromeda

INTRODUCTION TO THE TELESCOPE

APPLICATION NOTE. Filter Set Prescription Alan Holmes

Open Cluster Research Project

Measurements of 42 Wide CPM Pairs with a CCD

Helping Henrietta Leavitt Measure Cepheid Variables

Planetary Science From Stratospheric Balloons, BRRISON Mission Overview, and Poten=al 2014 Re- flight Op=ons SBAG - January 8-9, 2014

ADVANCED CCD PHOTOMETRY AND EXOPLANET TRANSIT PHOTOMETRY. By : Kenny A. Diaz Eguigure

CLEA/VIREO PHOTOMETRY OF THE PLEIADES

Near-Infrared Tip-Tilt Sensor Observing Operations Concept Document

Introduction: Objectives: (a) To understand how to compile a list of objects for imaging with a CCD.

Ivan Valtchanov Herschel Science Centre European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC) ESA. ESAC,20-21 Sep 2007 Ivan Valtchanov, Herschel Science Centre

This is the third of 3 parts detailing my experience of auto guiding for astrophotography.

The Universe o. Galaxies. The Universe of. Galaxies. Ajit Kembhavi IUCAA

Transcription:

1. General Procedures September 2008 LGS Science Observing Plan 9/18/08 v1.1, A. Bouchez We should attempt to complete highest priority observing programs first, before proceeding to lower priority programs. Don t be too quick to leave a target due to clouds. Chasing holes is quite hopeless. Just stay on the target and take data when possible. Please record time spent on each target (from start of slew to the target, to end of last integration) and estimated of data quality. If poor, then we will repeat the observation on a subsequent night before proceeding down the queue. 2. Observing Schedule 9/19/08 (Date & times are UT) Start 05:50 Target 400 IRS18555 (Sahai) H/Ks imaging as deep as possible until it sets. Alternate: 102 or 103 (Adams) J/H/Ks imaging mosaic. 05:50 08:20 Target 301 7709 (Djorgovski). Go as deep as possible in 2.5 hrs. Alternate: Targets 200-203 (Bernat) 08:20 12:40 Targets 204-207, 209, 211 (Bernat). Avoid others within 20º of moon. 9/20/08 Start 05:50 Target 400 IRS18555 (Sahai) H imaging/spectroscopy until el=45º. Alternate: 102 or 103 (Adams) J/H/Ks imaging mosaic. 05:50 08:20 Target 301 7709 (Djorgovski). Go as deep as possible in 2.5 hrs. Alternate: Targets 200-203 (Bernat) 08:20 12:40 Targets 204-214 (Bernat). 215 too close to moon. 9/21/08 9/23/08 UT TBD 1

Observing Programs Sahai Priority 1: 5 hrs 400 IR1855+0056 18 58 08.47 +01 00 42.1 2000 401 IR2019+3448 20 21 18.89 +34 57 50.9 2000 402 IR2032+4057 20 34 13.26 +41 08 14.1 2000 403 IR0004+6521 00 07 02.60 +65 38 38.2 2000 Goal: Imaging and spectroscopy of stellar interlopers with surrounding ISM structure. Acquisition Target 400 has an R~14.0 star 30 to SE, within standard CR angle acquisition field. Observations (H/Ks imaging only) 1. PHARO setup: 25 field, H filter, std. cross, endpt reads=1, integ.=1.4s, frames=1 2. Check signal level on target. Adjust integration to get ~20k peak counts on brightest stars. If integ.>10s, increase number of endpoint reads to reduce read noise. 3. Open loops and offset 60. Save 1 background integration. 4. Return and close loops. Save one object integration. 5. Center target in field if necessary. 6. Run bxy5 macro, N frames in each position (where N*integ ~ 3min). If interrupted, complete manually (5 steps around a box, then move back to box center) 7. Open loops, offset 60 and repeat dither pattern on sky with N*integ ~ 1 min. 8. Switch to Ks filter, repeat steps 2 & 6-7. Email Correspondence Hi antonin, the 4 objects in the list i sent are in order of their priority. i listed both imaging and spectroscopy in my proposal -- if limited by time, i would proceed as follows (in order from least time to most time): (A) carry out H-band imaging, and then grism spectroscopy on 18555 [if slit can be aligned, it should be at PA=28 deg to cover tail], (B) add J/K imaging of 18555 (C) add H-band imaging of 20193 (D) add grism spectroscopy of 20193 [slit aligned E-W if possible] (E) add J/K imaging of 20193 Antonin Bouchez wrote: Since we are performing these observations in service observing mode (a first for Palomar Observatory, I believe), we will need some more information from you about how they are to be performed. The list below is a good start, but here are some questions: - How much total integration time do you think you need in each case? i think 10 minutes per band would be a reasonable average. however much depends on "what you get" since i don't have any way of estimating the brightness of the nebulosities next to the compact bright heads in each object, in the near-ir. The two-fold goal of the imaging is to 1) determine structure of extended nebulosity trailing behind the bright head, 2) determine the properties of the presumed near-ir point-source (only in 00044 is a star visible in the HST images) -- star/binary, slightly tilted edge-on disk, or a combination of both. is there any way i can monitor what is happening in real time, remotely? alternatively, i could come up to palomar if i knew in advance when my source(s) would be observed. - What slit width to use for spectroscopy (0.1", 0.2", 0.5", 2.0") 2

0.2" - What calibrations do you need (photometric, spectroscopic, PSF?) PSF for imaging and spectroscopic calibration most important - Any preferred dither pattern to use for imaging? Or do you need off- target sky frames? for 18555, 20324, 00044 need off-target sky frames for 20193, can use on-chip dither - I assume we should limit integration times to avoid saturation on the stars? yes Could you also provide a phone number for us to contact you at if we have any lastminute questions? 818 653 4996 (cell) 3

Bernat Priority 2: 10 hrs + Priority 6: 5 hrs Will be present on 9/18 to assist with observations. 200 2M2036+1051 20 36 03.1 +10 51 29.5 2000 201 2M2137+1450 21 37 10.4 +14 50 47.5 2000 202 2M2238+4353 22 38 07.4 +43 53 17.9 2000 203 2M2242+2542 22 42 53.1 +25 42 57.3 2000 204 2M0015+3516 00 15 44.7 +35 16 02.6 2000 205 2M0036+1821 00 36 16.1 +18 21 10.4 2000 206 2M0045+1634 00 45 21.4 +16 34 44.6 2000 207 2M0131+3801 01 31 18.3 +38 01 55.4 2000 208 2M0141+1804 01 41 03.2 +18 04 50.2 2000 209 2M0147+3453 01 47 33.4 +34 53 11.2 2000 210 2M0208+2542 02 08 18.3 +25 42 53.3 2000 211 2M0213+4444 02 13 28.8 +44 44 45.3 2000 212 2M0228+2537 02 28 11.0 +25 37 38.0 2000 213 2M0230+2704 02 30 15.5 +27 04 06.1 2000 214 2M0314+1603 03 14 03.4 +16 03 05.6 2000 215 2M0345+2540 03 45 43.1 +25 40 23.3 2000 4

Djorgovski Priority 3: 5 hrs 300 7707 01 04 59.71-08 41 42.3 2000 301 7709 23 05 45.67-00 36 08.6 2000 302 7711 01 32 56.33 +00 43 26.1 2000 (9/22,9/23 UT only) Goal: Deep single-band imaging of compact arcs (<2 radius) around faint galaxies. Acquisition Target 300 is hopeless: It s up for 1.5 hrs, and what I thought was a guidestar is a galaxy. Target 301 has an R~15 guidestar 40 to the north. Requires cass ring angle of 244.3 (=std.-90) for acquisition. Target 302 will be added to the target lists for 9/22 and 9/23 UT. It has an R=13.3 guidestar 37 to the East. It can be acquired at the standard Cass ring angle. Observations 1. PHARO setup: 25 field, Ks filter, std. cross, endpt reads=8, integ.=120s, frames=1 2. Open loops and offset 60. Save a single 120s background integration (sky for acquisition). 3. Return and close loops. Save a single 120s object integration. 4. Center galaxy in the PHARO FOV. 5. Run bxy5 macro, 2 frames in each position. This will run for ~21min. If interrupted, complete manually (5 steps around a box, then move back to box center) 6. Move target 1 in a random direction, and run bxy5 again. 7. Repeat until time is up. 5

Adams Priority 4: 5 hrs 100 GGD12-15 06 10 51.00-06 11 30.0 2000 101 SerpensS 18 30 03.00-02 01 58.2 2000 102 IRAS+20500 20 07 04.00 +27 30 00.0 2000 103 W75 20 39 01.60 +42 22 37.0 2000 Goal: Identify membership of young clusters in nearby star-forming regions. Acquisition Target 100 is hopeless; never up. Target 101 has an R~14 guidestar 60 to the SW. Requires cass ring angle of 90 or 148 for acquisition. Targets 102-103 TBD Observations This is not precisely what Joe requests below, but it s the most reasonable approximation I could come up with for now! 1. PHARO setup: 40 field, Ks filter, std. cross, endpt reads=1, integ.=1.4s, frames=1 2. Check signal level on central field. Adjust integration up to 24s to get ~20k peak counts on brightest stars. If integ.>10s, increase number of endpoint reads to reduce read noise. 3. Run adams1 macro, N frames in each position (where N*integ = 24s). If interrupted, recenter and start again. adams1 will take 5 images in a 0.6 throw cross pattern, in each of J/H/Ks filters. It will take ~8 min to run. 4. Mosaic a 70 x70 area a. Offset (in 5 steps) 15 N and 15 E. Repeat step 3 b. Offset (in 5 steps) 30 W. Repeat step 3 c. Offset (in 5 steps) 30 S. Repeat step 3 d. Offset (in 5 steps) 30 E. Repeat step 3 Email Correspondence Hi Antonin, Attached are object coordinates for the run and dither patterns (in PIXEL coordinates). The dither patterns are large dithers for mosaiking with embedded small dithers (5 per position in the mosaic). The small dithers are 15 pixels moves in a "plus" sign. The 5x8 pattern is large (many moves) you may have to break it into pieces. 40 arcsec FOV. JHKs bands for each pointing. 24 sec total integration time per dither position. This gives 5 x 24 sec = 120 sec per position in the mosaic. Notes: SerpSmain 5x8 pointings mosaic (long way N-S) SerpSsubm 2x2 pointings mosaic SerpSIRAS 2x2 pointings mosaic SerpSchain single pointing SerpStrio single pointing SerpSNIRsc single pointing SerpSIRACsc single pointing IRAS20050 3x3 pointings mosaic (2x2 if time is short) W75 single pointing 6

GGD12-15 2x3 pointings mosaic (long way E-W) Let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to call me anytime of night. 607-255-6595 (W) 607-387-5568 (H) 607-280-7087 (cell) 7

Roberts Priority 7: 5 hrs 500 1821+107 18 24 02.9 +10 44 24 2000 501 1937-101 19 39 57.3-10 02 42 2000 502 2059+034 21 01 38.8 +03 41 31 2000 503 2216-038 22 18 52.0-03 35 37 2000 504 2223-052 22 25 47.2-04 57 01 2000 505 2227-088 22 29 40.1-08 32 54 2000 506 1656+053 16 58 33.4 +05 15 16 2000 507 1830+285 18 32 50.2 +28 33 36 2000 508 2200+420 22 02 43.3 +42 16 40 2000 509 2201+315 22 03 15.0 +31 45 38 2000 510 0241+622 02 44 57.7 +62 28 07 2000 511 0552+398 05 55 30.8 +39 48 49 2000 512 0738+313 07 41 10.7 +31 12 00 2000 513 0754+100 07 57 06.6 +09 56 35 2000 514 0839+187 08 42 05.1 +18 35 41 2000 515 0851+202 08 54 48.9 +20 06 31 2000 516 1749+096 17 51 32.8 +09 39 02 2000 517 1848+283 18 50 27.6 +28 25 14 2000 518 1908-201 19 11 09.7-20 06 55 2000 519 0235+164 02 38 38.9 +16 37 00 2000 520 0405-123 04 07 48.5-12 11 36 2000 521 0605-085 06 07 59.7-08 34 49 2000 522 1701+518 17 01 25.0 +51 49 20 2000 523 1818+537 18 18 10.4 +53 43 46 2000 524 1821+643 18 21 57.2 +64 20 36 2000 525 2304-087 23 04 43.5-08 41 08 2000 526 2351-012 23 51 56.1-01 09 13 2000 527 0006+437 00 06 36.6 +43 42 29 2000 528 0029+133 00 29 13.8 +13 16 05 2000 529 0707+646 07 07 13.1 +64 35 59 2000 530 0758+393 07 58 00.1 +39 20 29 2000 531 0827+097 08 27 40.1 +09 42 10 2000 Note: These targets are numbered 1000-1031 in Lewis s email below. Here's a list of LGS objects. Before you had said it would be good to have an NGS list also, so I have included that too. Objects 1000-1031 are the quasars that I listed in my recent proposal. We haven't compiled guide stars for all of these, so if you see a bright tip/tilt star nearby please use it. We want to be able to image the galaxy around the quasar. Objects 1100-1107 are O-stars in Cyg OB2, which we would like to look for faint binary stars. I don't have V-magnitudes, for any of them. From the B and J magnitudes, they all look 12-14 magnitude. I thought they would be excellent tip/tilt stars. We'd like to be able to see stars with dynamic ranges of 8 magnitudes at several arcseconds from the primary. Objects numbers less than 1000 are NGS objects. All are bright stars with known binary companions. We would like to see companions with a dynamic range of 8 magnitudes at several arcseconds from the primary. Summary NGS: 1-301 Binary stars Observe in J &K NGS: 302 Binary w/disk Observe in Br-Gamma K-cont 8

NGS: 303 P Cygni Observe in Br-Gamma K-cont LGS: 1000-1031 Quasars Observe in J & K LGS: 1100-1107 O stars Observe in K All observations will use the narrowest field of view. For all objects, we need multiple exposures, and would like the images dithered around the field. I don't have a good feel for PHARO, so I am not sure what exposure times to use. Can you set the exposure time, so that we are at ~75% full well status, and 5-10 minutes of data per filter. If that's a dumb thing to do for some reason let me know. Feel free to call me if you have questions: Home: 323-478-1078 Cell: 808-280-3147 Thanks, Lewis Roberts, Ph.D. 9