Comparison bet ween the observation of the particle detector inside ZY21 Satellite and the model of the radiation belt

Similar documents
Radiation Environment. Efforts at JPL. Dr. Henry Garrett. Jet Propulsion Laboratory 4800 Oak Grove Dr. Pasadena, CA 91109

Time variations of proton flux in the Earth inner radiation belt for years based on the PAMELA and the ARINA data

Operational Impacts of Space Weather

Definition of a Twelve-Point Polygonal SAA Boundary for the GLAST Mission

S5p INTENTIONALLY BLANK

Using invariant altitude (h inv ) for mapping of the radiation belt fluxes in the low-altitude environment

U.S. Radiation Dose Limits for Astronauts

GREEN: the new Global Radiation Earth ENvironment model (beta version)

SOUTH ATLANTIC ANOMALY AND CUBESAT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Single Particle Motion in a Magnetized Plasma

Pitch angle distribution of trapped energetic protons and helium isotope nuclei measured along the Resurs-01 No. 4 LEO satellite

AE8/AP8 IMPLEMENTATIONS IN AE9/AP9, IRBEM, AND SPENVIS

NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center Data and Services. Terry Onsager and Howard Singer NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center

Tracking Solar Eruptions to Their Impact on Earth Carl Luetzelschwab K9LA September 2016 Bonus

The South Atlantic Anomaly drift on the proton flux data of satellite experiments

Leptons with E > 200 MeV trapped in the Earth s radiation belts

The Structure of the Magnetosphere

Electron Polar Cap and the Boundary oœ Open Geomagnetic Field Lines

USING SPACE WEATHER VARIABILITY IN EVALUATING THE RADIATION ENVIRONMENT DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR NASA'S CONSTELLATION PROGRAM

Radiation Belt Analyses: needs, data and analysis

Jovian Radiation Environment Models at JPL

DIN EN : (E)

This project has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie-Sklodowska-Curie grant

OSTST, October 2014

Adiabatic effects on radiation belt electrons at low altitude

H. Koshiishi, H. Matsumoto, A. Chishiki, T. Goka, and T. Omodaka. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

MEASUREMENT OF NEAR EARTH RADIATION ENVIRONMENT IN JAXA - OVERVIEW AND PLAN -

LEEM: A new empirical model of radiation-belt electrons in the low-earth-orbit region

Overview of the ISS radiation environment observed during EXPOSE- R2 mission in

RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS AND ULF-ACTIVITY DYNAMICS DURING CIR- AND CME-STORMS IN MAY 2005

Low energy electrons at MEO during observed surface charging events

Letter to the Editor. Astronomy. Astrophysics. Radiation environment along the INTEGRAL orbit measured with the IREM monitor

Electron flux enhancement in the inner radiation belt during moderate magnetic storms

ON THE PERIODIC MODULATION OF ENERG TitleELECTRONS IN THE MAGNETOSPHERIC SKI REGION.

BIRA-IASB, 30th October 2006

The AE9/AP9 Radiation and Plasma Environment Models

How is Earth s Radiation Belt Variability Controlled by Solar Wind Changes

Solar Energetic Particles measured by AMS-02

Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering, Beijing , China *Corresponding author

1.2 Coordinate Systems

Remote sensing of magnetospheric processes: Lesson 1: Configura7on of the magnetosphere

Monitoring solar energetic particles with ESA SREM units

Multi Spacecraft Observation of Compressional Mode ULF Waves Excitation and Relativistic Electron Acceleration

Verification of Short-Term Predictions of Solar Soft X-ray Bursts for the Maximum Phase ( ) of Solar Cycle 23

Submitted to Chinese Physics C. Physical Design and Monte Carlo Simulations of a Space Radiation. Detector onboard the SJ-10 satellite

Quiet Time Precipitation Patterns of Energetic Particles

Radiation belt particle dynamics

POES SEM-2 Observations of Radiation Belt Dynamics and Energetic Electron Precipitation in to the Atmosphere

Mission to Understand Electron Pitch Angle Diffusion and Characterize Precipitation Bands and Spikes. J. F. Fennell 1 and P. T.

Study of the radiation fields in LEO with the Timepix detector

MAE 5595: Space Environments and Spacecraft Interactions. Lesson 4: Introduction

Uppsala universitet Institutionen för astronomi och rymdfysik Anders Eriksson

Van Allen Probes Mission and Applications

Space Weather Service for Chinese Space Science Satellites

November 2013 analysis of high energy electrons on the Japan Experimental Module (JEM: Kibo)

Multisatellite observations of MeV ion injections during storms

ISSCREM: International Space Station Cosmic Radiation Exposure Model

Myagkova I.N., Panasyuk M.I., Kalegaev V.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow

Internal Charging Hazards in Near-Earth Space during Solar Cycle 24 Maximum: Van Allen Probes Measurements

Cosmic Ray Effects on Micro- Electronics (CRÈME) Tools Brian Sierawski 2017 SEESAW

Relativistic Solar Electrons - where and how are they formed?

2. OBSERVATIONS. Introduction

lfhhhhflll TR 008(3940-O5)-S SD-TR F C-OWE LVCOSIFIED FIG 4/1 ML

Air Force Research Laboratory

Theory and Modeling (High Performance Simulation)

Results from the PAMELA Space Experiment

INTERPLANETARY ASPECTS OF SPACE WEATHER

New conjunctive CubeSat and balloon measurements to quantify rapid energetic electron precipitation

Two Space High Energy Astrophysics Missions of China: POLAR & HXMT

Low energy electrons in the inner Earth s magnetosphere

Specification of electron radiation environment at GEO and MEO for surface charging estimates

The Evolution of the South Atlantic Anomaly Measured by RHESSI

Features of energetic particle radial profiles inferred from geosynchronous responses to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements

Juno Status and Earth Flyby Plans. C. J. Hansen

ACS WFC CCD Radiation Test: The Radiation Environment

Solar particle events contribution in the space radiation exposure on electronic equipment

CREATION OF SOLAR PROTON BELTS DURING MAGNETIC STORMS: COMPARISON OF TWO MODELS. L.L. Lazutin

Space Radiation Dosimetry - Recent Measurements and Future Tasks

AE9/AP9-IRENE space radiation climatology model

Comparison of energetic ions in cusp and outer radiation belt

The Los Alamos Dynamic Radiation Environment Assimilation Model (DREAM) for Space Weather Specification and Forecasting

Relative contribution of electrons to the stormtime total ring current energy content

A Survey of Spacecraft Charging Events on the DMSP Spacecraft in LEO

Calculating standard captured spectra of formation elements

Analysis of the EVA Doses Observed by Liulin-Type Instruments on ISS

Sources and sinks of equatorially mirroring energetic charged particles in the earth s inner magnetosphere

Geomagnetic cutoff simulations for low-energy cosmic rays

Intercomparisons of the proton models

Radiation Effects in MMIC Devices

The Trapped Proton Environment in Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)

OUIINAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, SPACE 1DHYSICS : VOL. 74, No. 21, OCTOIlER 1, Brief Reports

Award # N J-1716

Numerical simulation of Earth s gravitational field recovery from SST based on the energy conservation principle

Comparison between POES energetic electron precipitation observations and

LEO radiation environment: impacts on PROBA. Erwin De Donder BIRA-IASB Space Weather Section

R TERRESTRIAL DISTURBANCES

Forecasting Earthquakes and Space Weather

CME linear-fit. 3. Data and Analysis. 1. Abstract

The effects and correction of the geometric factor for the POES/MEPED electron flux instrument using a multi-satellite comparison.

Relativity and Charged Particle Motion in Magnetic Fields

Transcription:

50 3 2007 5 CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS Vol. 50, No. 3 May, 2007,,, 2007, 50 (3) :678 683 Zou H, Chen H F, Zou J Q, et al. Comparison between the observation of the particle detector inside ZY21 Satellite and the model of the radiation belt. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2007, 50 (3) :678 683 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2 1, 100871 2 501, 100086 AE8ΠAP8,, AE8 NOAA,( ) ( ),, 90 0,,,, 0001-5733(2007)03-0678 - 06 P353 2006-07 - 28, 2007-01 - 23 Comparison bet ween the observation of the particle detector inside ZY21 Satellite and the model of the radiation belt ZOU Hong 1, CHEN Hong2Fei 1, ZOU Ji2Qing 1, SHI Wei2Hong 1, XIAO Zuo 1, HAO Yong2Qiang 1, WU Zhong2Xiang 2, XIANG Hong2Wen 2, ZHU Wen2Ming 2 1 Department of Geophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 2 Chinese Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100086, China Abstract The observation of the particle detector inside ZY21 (CBERS21) satellite is compared with the radiation belt models (AE8ΠAP8). It is found that the measurement in SAA (Southern Atlantic Anomaly) is in accord with the predictions by the models, while the measured electron flux is much lower than the prediction by the AE8 model in the regions of southern and northern aurora belts. According to the observation of NOAA2 POES satellite, this difference is considered to be caused by the difference of the particle pitch angle distributions in SAA and the regions of the aurora belts. The particle s flux in SAA is inclined to be isotropic, while in the regions of the aurora belts it is obviously anisotropic where the particles distributed near 90 pitch angle are much larger than that distributed near 0 pitch angle. Keywords Particle detector inside ZY21, Radiation belt model, Pitch angle distribution, SAA, Auroral belt (40425004) (XK100010404),,1975,,2003, E2mail :derakzou @yahoo. com. cn

3 : 679 1 (CBERS21) 1999 10 14,, 015 210 MeV > 210 MeV 5 30 MeV 30 60 MeV [1,2 ]., 780 km, 9815, 10013 min.,,, 780 km, [3 ]., [4 ]. 2 X [5,6 ]., 1958 Van Allen et al. [7 ], [8 11 ],, NASA AP8ΠAE8 [12,13 ], AP8ΠAE8 (011 400 MeV) (0104 7 MeV). NOAA,, 850 km. MEPED, 30 kev 275 MeV NOAA AE8ΠAP8, 2, (015 210 MeV) (5 30 MeV) AE8ΠAP8, : (1) (, ),, AE8ΠAP8, 2 mm,, 015 210 MeV 1149 2196 MeV, 5 30 MeV 1815 3615 MeV (2) [14 ], j = NΠG, (1) j, N G, AE8Π AP8,, J J = j ( ) d, (2) 4, (2) J = 4 j = 4 NΠG. (3), 015 210 MeV 2129 cm 2 sr,5 30 MeV 2155 cm 2 sr., 015 210 MeV 5 30 MeV J e = 4 N e Π2. 29 = 5. 49 N e, J p = 4 N p Π2. 55 = 4. 93 N p. (3) (4) Lemaire et al. [15 ] Heynderickx et al. [16 ], AP8 AE8 30,,,, Jensen & Cain (1962) GSFC 12Π66 211 015 210 MeV AE8 1999 12 ( )

680 (Chinese J. Geophys. ) 50 015 210 MeV,, ( :3 ) 015 210 MeV, 1a, AE8 1999 12 1149 2196 MeV, 3, 1b, 015 210 MeV, AE8., AE8,, 4133 (2116 10 4 cm - 2 s - 1 ), AE8 4144 (2175 10 4 cm - 2 s - 1 )., AE8 3173 (5134 10 3 cm - 2 s - 1 ), AE8 4169 (4190 10 4 cm - 2 s - 1 ). 3122 (1165 10 3 cm - 2 s - 1 ), AE8 4143 (2169 10 4 cm - 2 s - 1 )., AE8 20 % 2 mm,, AE8 212 5 30 MeV AP8, 1999 12 5 30 MeV AP8 1999 12 (1815 3615 MeV), 2 AP8. 2196 (9112 10 2 cm - 2 s - 1 ), AP8 2198 (9155 10 2 cm - 2 s - 1 )., AP8, AE8 AP8, AE8 3 NOAA, NOAA NOAA MEPED (Medium Energy Proton and Electron Detector, ), 30, > 30 kev > 100 kev > 300 kev 30 80 kev 80 240 kev 240 800 kev 800 2500 kev 2500 6900 kev > 6900 kev,, 0 ; 0,,, 90. 120,, > 16 MeV > 35 MeV > 70 MeV > 140 MeV 311 NOAA, NOAA215 ( : 30 W 90 W ; :40 S 0 ) 90, 1 ( :,, 0 90, 90 0 ).,, 90 0,

3 : 681 1 1999 12 015 210 MeV (a) AE8 (b) Fig. 1 Comparison between the ZY21 015 210 MeV electron measurement (a) and the AE8 prediction (b) in Dec., 1999 2 1999 12 5 30 MeV (a) AP8 (b) Fig. 2 Comparison between the ZY21 5 30 MeV proton measurement (a) and the AP8 prediction (b) in Dec., 1999 3 1999 12 NOAA215 MEPED 16 35 MeV (a) AP8 (b) Fig. 3 Comparison between the NOAA215 MEPED 16 35 MeV proton measurement (a) and the AP8 prediction (b) in Dec., 1999 4 1999 12 NOAA215MEPED 0 (a) 90 (b) > 300 kev Fig. 4 Comparison of the > 300 kev electron measurements by the MEPED 0 detector (a) and 90 detector (b) onboard NOAA215 satellite in the regions of aurora belts in Dec., 1999

682 (Chinese J. Geophys. ) 50 1 NOAA215 MEPED 90 Table 1 Comparison of the particle s differential flux measured in SAA by the MEPED 0 detector and 90 detector onboard NOAA215 satellite 90 (cm - 2 s - 1 sr - 1 ) 0 (cm - 2 s - 1 sr - 1 ) 90 Π0 > 30 kev 616440 10 5 917657 10 4 618 > 100 kev 512544 10 5 713857 10 4 711 > 300 kev 110422 10 5 313359 10 4 311 30 80 kev 80 240 kev 240 800 kev 800 2500 kev 2500 6900 kev 518449 10 3 316418 10 3 116 117214 10 4 816296 10 3 210 115173 10 4 117481 10 4 019 410433 10 3 617915 10 3 016 019466 10 3 116207 10 3 016 > 6900 kev 210727 10 4 219085 10 4 017 312 NOAA AP8, NOAA MEPED 16 35 MeV AP8, 3,NOAA215 MEPED 16 35 MeV 3115 (1141 10 3 cm - 2 s - 1 ), AP8 3112 (1132 10 3 cm - 2 s - 1 ). NOAA,,, NOAA MEPED 16 35 MeV AP8 4 NOAA MEPED,, AE8 AP8 NOAA 0 90,,,, [17 ].. NOAA 0 90,,,, AE8, 120,, (0 60 ).,,, 90,, 1000 km, 90 4 NOAA 0 90 > 300 kev 4, 0 90 800 km, 90 5 NOAA AE8ΠAP8, 780 850 km,, 90 0

3 : 683 (References) [ 1 ],, ( ),2003, 39(3) : 361 369 Xiao Z, Zou J Q, Zou H, et al. Energetic particle detector onboard ZY21 satellite. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis (in Chinese), 2003, 39 (3) : 361 369 [ 2 ],, 780 km ( ), 2003, 39 (3) : 370 374 Zou H, Xiao Z, Wu Z X, et al. Energetic particle event detected by polar orbited satellite at the height of 780 km. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis ( in Chinese), 2003, 39 ( 3) : 370 374 [ 3 ],, E,2006,36 (3) :304 319 Zou H, Xiao Z, Hao Y Q, et al. Analysis of the observation of particle detector inside CBERS21 satellite under solar quiet conditions. Science in China ( Series E) (in Chinese), 2006, 36 (3) : 304 319 [ 4 ],,,2006,49(3) :636 641 Zou H, Xiao Z, Hao YQ, et al. Observation of the disturbed events by the particle detector inside ZY21 satellite. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2006, 49 (3) : 636 641 [ 5 ],, X,2004, 47(4) : 562 570 Zou H, Xiao Z, Zou J Q, et al. A comparison between detections of energetic electron by ZY1ΠCBMC and SZ2ΠXD. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2004, 47 (4) :562 570 [ 6 ],, 2001 4 2,2004, 47 (5) : 737 742 Ma Y Q, Wang H Y, Zhang C M, et al. A conjunctive study of solar flare 20010402 and related solar proton events by the observation of SZ2ΠXD and ZY1ΠCBMC. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2004, 47 (5) :737 742 [ 7 ] Van Allen J A, Ludwig G H, Mcllwain C E. Observation of high intensity radiation by satellites 1958 and. Jet Propulsion, 1958, 28 : 588 592 [ 8 ] Northrop T G, Teller E. Stability of the adiabatic motion of charged particles in earth s field. Phys. Rev., 1960, 117 : 215 [ 9 ] McIlwain C E. Coordinates for mapping the distribution of magnetically trapped particles. J. Geophys. Res., 1961, 66 : 3681 [10 ] Hess W N. The Radiation Belt and the Magnetosphere. New York Blaisdell, 1968 [11 ] Heckman H H, Nakano G H. Low2altitude trapped protons during solar minimum period. J. Geophys. Res., 1969, 74 : 3575 [12 ] Sawyer D M, Vette J I. AP8 Trapped Proton Environment for Solar Maximum and Solar Minimum. NSSDC WDC2A2R&S 76206, NASA2 GSFC, 1976 [13 ] Vette J I. The AE28 Trapped Electron Model Environment. NSSDCΠ WDC2A2R&S Report 91224, NASA2GSFC, 1991 [14 ] :,1986 Ye Z H. Technology of Space Particle Radiation Detection ( in Chinese). Beijing : Science Press, 1986 [15 ] Lemaire J, Johnston A D, Heynderickx D, et al. TREND22 (Trapped Radiation Environment Model Development) Final Report. European Space Agency Contract Report, ESTECΠContract No. 9828Π 92ΠNLΠFM, 1995 [16 ] Heynderickx D, Lemaire J, Daly E J. Historical review of the different procedures used to compute the L2parameter. Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas., 1996, 26 : 325 334 [17 ] Kruglanski M. Engineering tool for trapped proton flux anisotropy evaluation. Radiat. Meas., 1996, 26 : 953 ( )