Nuclear Direct Reactions to Continuum 4

Similar documents
Evaluation of inclusive breakup cross sections in reactions induced by weakly-bound nuclei within a three-body model

Deuteron induced reactions, spin distributions and the surrogate method

Mean-field concept. (Ref: Isotope Science Facility at Michigan State University, MSUCL-1345, p. 41, Nov. 2006) 1/5/16 Volker Oberacker, Vanderbilt 1

Deuteron induced reactions

Momentum Transfer Dependence of Spin Isospin Modes in Quasielastic Region (RCNP E131 Collaboration) Tomotsugu WAKASA RCNP Osaka University

Inclusive deuteron induced reactions

Nucleon Transfer within Distorted Wave Born Approximation

Recent advances in nuclear reaction theories for weakly bound nuclei

Nuclear structure: spectroscopic factors; correlations (short and long-range); high momentum components Nuclear structure: a wide angle view

Shells Orthogonality. Wave functions

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Structure Decay Data: Theory and Evaluation August Introduction to Nuclear Physics - 1

Short-Ranged Central and Tensor Correlations. Nuclear Many-Body Systems. Reaction Theory for Nuclei far from INT Seattle

Status of deuteron stripping reaction theories

Linking nuclear reactions and nuclear structure to on the way to the drip lines

Green Functions in Many Body Quantum Mechanics

Using Electron Scattering Superscaling to predict Charge-changing Neutrino Cross Sections in Nuclei

Crawling Towards a (more) complete description of deuteron-induced reactions

Direct reactions methodologies for use at fragmentation beam energies

Spin-Parity Decomposition of Spin Dipole Resonances and Tensor Interaction Effects. Tomotsugu Wakasa. Department of Physics, Kyushu University

Asymmetry dependence of Gogny-based optical potential

Inclusive breakup measurements of the 7 Li+ 119 Sn system.

Single-particle and cluster excitations

Other electrons. ε 2s < ε 2p ε 3s < ε 3p < ε 3d

Two neutron transfer in Sn isotopes

Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys Dynamical self-energy in finite system

Spectral function at high missing energies and momenta

Pairing in Nuclear and Neutron Matter Screening effects

Lecture 6. Fermion Pairing. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Toward a unified description of equilibrium and dynamics of neutron star matter

Problems in deuteron stripping reaction theories

1 Introduction. 2 The hadronic many body problem

Comprehensive treatment of correlations at different. energy scales in nuclei using Green s functions

Exploring contributions from incomplete fusion in 6,7 Li+ 209 Bi and 6,7 Li+ 198 Pt reactions

Gamow Teller 1 + states in Sb isotopes

Coulomb Corrections in Quasielastic Scattering off Heavy Nuclei

R. P. Redwine. Bates Linear Accelerator Center Laboratory for Nuclear Science Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Coexistence phenomena in neutron-rich A~100 nuclei within beyond-mean-field approach

Allowed beta decay May 18, 2017

I. 1. Nuclear Structure Study of 50 Mn by Charge-exchange (p,n) Reaction on 50 Cr

Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys. 540

Three- and four-particle scattering

Understanding/calculating the nucleon self-energy at positive and negative energy

RPA CORRECTION TO THE OPTICAL POTENTIAL

Coupled-channels Neutron Reactions on Nuclei

RFSS: Lecture 8 Nuclear Force, Structure and Models Part 1 Readings: Nuclear Force Nuclear and Radiochemistry:

Lecture #3 a) Nuclear structure - nuclear shell model b) Nuclear structure -quasiparticle random phase approximation c) Exactly solvable model d)

Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys. 540

Excited states and tp propagator for fermions

Fine structure of nuclear spin-dipole excitations in covariant density functional theory

Towards a universal nuclear structure model. Xavier Roca-Maza Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Milano, June 28 29, 2017

Unitary-model-operator approach to nuclear many-body problems

3. Introductory Nuclear Physics 1; The Liquid Drop Model

Open quantum systems

Electroproduction of p-shell hypernuclei

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

Ecole normale supérieure (ENS) de Lyon. Institut de Physique Nucléaire d Orsay. Groupe de Physique Théorique

I. 2. Reduction of the Gamow-Teller Matrix Element for the β-decay in 70 Ga- 70 Zn by the 35-MeV (p,n) Reaction on 70 Zn

Coulomb breakup of light composite nuclei. Abstract

Calculations of the Pion-Nucleus Inelastic Cross Sections Using the Microscopic Optical Potential

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 11

Beyond mean-field study on collective vibrations and beta-decay

E438: Study of Σ-Nucleus Potential by the (π -, K + ) Reaction on Heavy Nuclei

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 8 (10/4/06) Neutron-Proton Scattering

Theory Challenges for describing Nuclear Reactions

Speed of light c = m/s. x n e a x d x = 1. 2 n+1 a n π a. He Li Ne Na Ar K Ni 58.

PHY982. Week Starting date Topic

Nuclear and Coulomb excitations of the pygmy dipole resonances

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction

Compound and heavy-ion reactions

Lecture 3. Solving the Non-Relativistic Schroedinger Equation for a spherically symmetric potential

The many facets of breakup reactions with exotic beams

Lecture VI: Neutrino propagator and neutrino potential

Physics 221B Spring 2012 Notes 42 Scattering of Radiation by Matter

DI-NEUTRON CORRELATIONS IN LOW-DENSITY NUCLEAR MATTER

Spin-Orbit Interactions in Nuclei and Hypernuclei

Low-energy reactions involving halo nuclei: a microscopic version of CDCC

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

7.1 Creation and annihilation operators

The Nuclear Equation of State

PHYS3113, 3d year Statistical Mechanics Tutorial problems. Tutorial 1, Microcanonical, Canonical and Grand Canonical Distributions

Correlations in isospin asymmetric matter and nuclei

Landau-Fermi liquid theory

Probing Nuclear Structure of Medium and Heavy Unstable Nuclei and Processes with Helium Isotopes

Nuclear spectroscopy using direct reactions of RI beams

Physic 492 Lecture 16

Workshop on low-energy nuclear reaction dynamics

Introduction to NUSHELLX and transitions

Semi-Classical perturbation theory Coulomb only First-order most used

Observables predicted by HF theory

Application of Equation of Motion Phonon Method to Nuclear and Exotic Nuclear Systems

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 24 May 2011

Lecture 9. Hartree Fock Method and Koopman s Theorem

Investigation of Nuclear Ground State Properties of Fuel Materials of 232 Th and 238 U Using Skyrme- Extended-Thomas-Fermi Approach Method

4. Spontaneous Emission october 2016

c E If photon Mass particle 8-1

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 28 Aug 2014

Chapter 3: Relativistic Wave Equation

Energy levels and radiative rates for Ne-like ions from Cu to Ga

Towards a microscopic theory for low-energy heavy-ion reactions

Transcription:

Nuclear Direct Reactions to Continuum 4 How to get Nuclear Structure Information Munetake ICHIMURA (RNC) VII. Response Function 1. Response Function and Polarization Propagator 2. Mean Field Approximation 3. Tamm-Dancoff Approximation 4. Random Phase Approximation 5. Fermi Gas Model 6. Relations to familiar quantities 7. Discussions 1

VIII. Inclusive Breakup Reactions 1. Breakup Processes 2. Formalism 3. Decomposition of elastic and non-elastic breakup 4. Applications 2

VII. Response Function Here I sketch how to calculate the response functions (Recall V. DWBA ) 1. Polarization Propagator 1.1. One-body Density Operator For unified expression, we write ρ F (r) = k F k δ(r r k ) where F k = σ (α) a,k, (α = 0, 1, a = 0, x, y, z) 3

1.2 Polarization Propagator Introduce Polarization propagators Π F F (r, r ; ω) Φ A ρ 1 F(r) ω H A + i δ ρ F (r ) Φ A H A : Internal Hamiltonian of the nucleus A. Response Functions We can write R F F (r, r ; ω) = 1 π Im Π F F (r, r ; ω) 4

2. Mean Field Approximation 2.1 Hamiltonian This is the 0-th order approximation. Approximate H A by Mean Field Hamiltonian, H 0 H A H 0 = k ĥ k T c.m. ĥ k : Single-particle Hamiltonian for the k-th nucleon in A ĥ k = T k + U m.f k U m.f k : Mean field (Hartree-Fock field) 5

Single particle states h : occupied single particle state p : unoccupied single particle state They obey ĥ h = ϵ h h, ĥ p = ϵ p p, p2 p1 h1 h2 h3 6

2.2. Free Polarization Propagator The polarization propagator in the mean field approximation is called Free polarization propagator Π (0) F F (r, r ; ω) = Φ (0) A ρ 1 F(r) ω (H 0 E (0) 0 ) + i δ ρ F (r ) Φ (0) A Φ (0) A : Ground state of A in the mean field approximation H 0 Φ (0) A = E (0) 0 Φ (0) A 7

Note the operation of the density operator ρ F (r ) Φ (0) A = h 1 p h 1 p ρ F (r ) Φ (0) A h,p the sum of 1-particle-1-hole states. p2 p1 h1 h2 h3 8

We can write Π (0) F F (r, r ; ω) = Φ (0) A ρ F(r) h 1 p p,h 1 ω (ϵ p ϵ h ) + i δ Here we introduced ph Green s function h 1 p ρ F (r ) Φ (0) A = Φ (0) A ρ F(r)G ph (ω)ρ F (r ) Φ (0) A G ph (ω) = h 1 1 p h,p ω (ϵ p ϵ h ) + i δ h 1 p How to cope with the infinite sum p unocc? p runs continuously! cf. h run only finite number of states, and thus can be handled. 9

Further manipulation G ph (ω) = h h 1 g(ω + ϵ h ) h 1 with where g(ϵ) = p 1 p unocc ϵ ϵ p + i δ p = 1 p p full ϵ ϵ p + i δ p 1 h ϵ ϵ p + i δ h h = g sp (ϵ) h g sp (ϵ) = = p full 1 h ϵ ϵ h + i δ h 1 p ϵ ϵ p + i δ p 1 ϵ ĥ + i δ 10

The single particle Green s function g sp (ϵ) in r representation g sp (r, r ; ϵ) = r g sp (ϵ) r 1 = r ϵ ĥ + i δ r is known to be calculable. Calculation of g sp (r, r ; ϵ) (Ignore spins) Angular momentum representation g sp (r, r ; ϵ) = lm Y lm (Ω r ) g l(r, r ; ϵ) rr Y lm(ω r ) 11

The radial parts g l (r, r ; ϵ) = 2m N W (f l, h l ) f l(r < ; ϵ)h l (r > ; ϵ) where r < = min(r, r ), r > = max(r, r ), f l (r; ϵ) and h l (r; ϵ) : regular and singular solutions of the equation 1 d 2 2m N dr + 1 l(l + 1) 2 2m N r 2 = ϵ u l (r; ϵ) + U m.f (r) u l (r; ϵ) W (f, h) : Wronskian W (f, h) = f h f h 12

Thus g(r, r ; ϵ) = r g(ϵ) r = g sp (r, r ; ϵ) 1 ϕ h (r) h ϵ ϵ h + i δ ϕ h(r ) is calculable ϕ h (r) : Bound state wave function of the state h Now we can calculate Free Polarization Propagator = h Π (0) F F (r, r ; ω) Φ (0) A ρ F(r) h g(r, r ; ω + ϵ h ) h ρ F (r ) Φ (0) A and get Free Response Function R (0) F F (r, r ; ω) = 1 Im Π(0) F F π (r, r ; ω) 13

[Comment] In actual calculations, various refinements should be taken into account. Spins, Isospins isobar, Complex mean field (representing particle spreading width) Energy-dependent mean field (radial dependent) effective mass m N m (r) Perey factor Spreading widths of holes Orthogonality condition etc. For details, see Manual of the program RESPQ in http://www.nishina.riken.jp/researcher/ archive/program e.html 14

3. Tamm-Dancoff Approximation (Usually abbreviated TDA) Consider the nuclear correlations induced by the ph interaction V ph ph interaction V ph h2 p2 p1 h1 V ph = F F d 3 rd 3 r ρ F (r)w F F (r, r )ρ F (r ) 15

Polarization propagators in TDA Take account of the correlation x x = x x x x + + + x x The polarization propagator with this correlation is given by the solution of the equation Π TDA F F (r, r ) = Π (0) + F F (r, r ) F F d 3 r d 3 r Π (0) F F (r, r ) W F F (r, r )Π TDA F F (r, r ) 16

4. Random Phase Approximation Ring approximation ( Commonly abbreviated as RPA ) More elaborated approximation. Generalize Free polarization propagator Π (0) F F as Π (0) F F (r, r ; ω) = Φ 0 ρ 1 F(r) ω (H 0 E 0 ) + i δ ρ F (r ) Φ 0 + Φ 0 ρ F (r 1 ) ω (H 0 E 0 ) + i δ ρ F(r) Φ 0 17

Polarization propagators in RPA Given by solving the RPA equation Π RPA F F (r, r ) = Π (0) + F F (r, r ) F F d 3 r d 3 r Π (0) F F (r, r ) W F F (r, r )Π RPA F F (r, r ) x x = x x x x x + + + x Once this approximation had been called New Tamm-Dancoff Approximation 18

5. Fermi Gas Model Recall PWBA formula d 2 σ dω dω = K s m A Ṽ (q ) 2 R ρ (ω, q ) R ρ (ω, q) = 1 π Im Φ A ρ 1 (q) ω H A + iη ρ(q) Φ A ρ((p) = A k=1 e ip r k Let us calculate the free response function R ρ (ω, q) in a simple model. Fermi gas model provides the analytic form, from which we can learn some characteristic of the response functions. 19

Fermi gas model Π (0) (q, ω) = Φ (0) A ρ (q) h 1 p p,h 1 ω (ϵ p ϵ h ) + i δ h 1 p ρ((q) Φ (0) A = d 3 p θ(p F p)θ( p q p F ) (2π) 3 ( ) ω (p q) 2 p2 + iδ 2m N 2m N = d 3 p θ(p F p)θ( p q p F ) (2π) 3 ω ( q 2 ) + iδ 2m N q p m N h = p, p = p q 20

The free response function R (0) (q, ω) = 1 π ImΠ(0) (q, ω) Π (0) (q, ω) can analytically be calculated. It is known as the Lindhart function. A.L. Fetter and J.D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-particle Systems, McGraw-Hill, Inc. (1971) 21

[Just for fun] Analytical form of R (0) (q, ω) p F : Fermi momentum ϵ F = p2 F 2m N : Fermi energy Set x = q 2p F, y = ω ϵ F For 0 x 1 R (0) (q, ω) = m Np F (2π) 2 y 4x 1 (x 4x y )2 y for 4x < 1 x for 1 x < y 4x < 1 + x For x > 1 R (0) (q, ω) = m Np F (2π) 2 1 (x 4x y 4x )2 for x 1 < y 4x < 1 + x 22

What spectrum R (0) (q, ω) has? 40 Ca q=1.75 fm -1 g NN =g ND = g DD = 0.6 M. Ichimura et al, PR 39 (1989) 1446 Peak at ω peak = q2 2m N 23

Whereis R (0) (q, ω) finite? 24

What region can we study? A reaction can reach very limited region. 1 90 Zr(p, n), T p = 300 MeV, θ = 0deg, 12 C(p, n), T p = 350 MeV, θ = 22deg M. Ichimura, H. Sakai and T. Wakasa, Prog. Part. Mucl. Phys. 56, 446 (2006) 25

6. Relation to familiar quantities Relation between R(q, ω) and familiar quantities. (1) GT strength B GT ±(ω) = X Φ X k t ± k σ k Φ A 2 δ(ω ω X ) R GT ±(q, ω) = X Thus Φ X k t ± k σ k e iq r i Φ A 2 δ(ω ω X ) B GT ±(ω) = R GT ±(q = 0, ω) (2) Fermi transition strength B F ±(ω) = X R F ±(q, ω) = X Φ X k Φ X k t ± k Φ A 2 δ(ω ω X ) t ± k e iq r i Φ A 2 δ(ω ω X ) B F ±(ω) = R F ±(q = 0, ω) 26

(3) E1 transition strength (> GDR) For the case J A = 0 B E1 (ω) = X 1 Φ X k t z,k r k Φ A 2 δ(ω ω X ) Response Function to the 1 states R IV1 (q, ω) = X 1 Φ X k = Φ X X 1 k δ(ω ω X ) = q 2 Φ X X 1 k Thus t z,k e iq r i Φ A 2 δ(ω ω X ) t z,k ( 1 iq ri + O(q 2 ) ) Φ A 2 t z,k r i Φ A 2 δ(ω ω X ) + O(q 4 ) 1 B E1 (ω) = lim q 0 q 2R IV1 (q, ω) 27

7. Discussion 7.1 Comments on the Fermi gas model (1) Fermi gas model is heuristic, but not necessarily realistic. (2) It may reasonably work for large q region (3) But for small q region, it is useless and even misleading. Spectrum at q = 0, 90 Zr to 90 Nb 28

(4) If you want to have R(q, ω), First calculate R(r, r ; ω), by the methods described in subsec. 2-4. Then take its Fourier transform R(q, ω) = R(q, q; ω) 7.2 Comments on calculation of R(r, r ; ω) (1) Choices of the mean field is crucial. (2) Choice of effective ph interaction is crucial. (3) Calculations are carried out in the angular momentum representation. Namely, calculate RSL,S J L (r, r ) (4) Taking suitable linear combinations of RSL,S J L (r, r ), we can calculate the response functions we want, such as R S, R L, R T, etc. 29

(5) How to include nuclear correlations beyond TDA or RPA in the framework of the present formalism is a longstanding subject There are lots of matters to be discussed about response functions. But they are out of scope in this lecture. For details about comments (3) and (4), see Manual of the program RESPQ in http://www.nishina.riken.jp/researcher/ archive/program e.html 30

7.3 Comments on PWIA (1) Factorized form d 2 σ dω dω = K V i(q) 2 R(q, ω) is very attractive nature to extract nuclear information R i (q, ω) (2) This doesn t hold in DWIA or more elaborate reaction theories. (3) PWIA is heuristic, but not realistic in general. (4) It may work for some cases, if one allows to use normalization factor as d 2 σ dω dω = N eff [ K Vi (q) 2 R(q, ω) ] N eff : Effective nucleon number 31

2 208 Pb(p, n) at 296 MeV. T. Wakasa, Private communication Looks OK, but to extract R i (q, ω) we need to know N eff from other independent data or by theoretical calculation. 32

Taddeucci s Prescription A kind od the N eff method. Applied to GT transitions, etc., very often. Set a semi-empirical ansatz d 2 σ(q, ω) dωdω = ˆσF (q, ω)r(q = 0, ω) ˆσ : unit cross section F (q, ω) : Normalized angular distribution F (q = 0, ω) = 1 e.g. R(q = 0, ω) = R F (ω) or R GT(ω) In N eff method, ˆσ = N eff K(q = 0) V (q = 0) 2 33

Calculate F (q, ω) by DWBA with simple nuclear structure model. * ω dependence is not care for. From observed database of d 2 σ(q, ω), and R(q = 0, ω) dωdω Evaluate ˆσ. Apply the formula to the newly observed data, and obtain R(q = 0, ω). Careful calibration is needed! 34

7.4 For more general cases My opinion is Structure models Response functions Reaction theories Feed back Modify the structure model (parameters in the model, etc.) Experimental Data Refine the reaction theory 35

VIII. Inclusive Breakup Reactions 1. Breakup Processes Consider the inclusive breakup reactions a + A b + anything a = b + x Assume b and x : structureless a b x x b A A X 36

The process is decomposed (1) Elastic breakup (2) Inelastic breakup (3) Transfer reaction (4) Breakup fusion (Incomplete fusion) Elastic breakup a b x b x A A We will consider the decomposition Elastic Breakup + Non-elastic Breakup d 2 σ inc de b dω b = d2 σ EBU de b dω b + d2 σ NEB de b dω b 37

2. Formalsm Hamiltonian H = T b + T x + H A + V xb + V xa + V ba = (T b + U ba ) + (T x + V xa ) + H A + (V xb + V ba U ba ) = (T a + U aa ) + (T bx + V bx ) + H A + (V xa + V ba U aa ) Wave functions H A Φ A = E A Φ A H X Φ X = (T x + V xa + H A )Φ X = E X Φ X (T bx + V bx )ϕ a = ϵ a ϕ a Distorted waves (T a + U aa )χ (+) a = E a χ (+) a (T b + U ba )χ ( ) b = E b χ ( ) b 38

Total energy of the initial state DWBA E i = E A + ϵ a + E a T fi = Φ X χ ( ) b V xb + V ba U ba Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a = Φ X χ ( ) b V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a Inclusive cross section d 2 σ inc = K de b dω Φ Xχ ( ) b V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) b X δ(e i E b E X ) Using the completeness, we get a d 2 σ inc = K Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a V post, χ ( ) b de b dω b δ(e i E b H X ) χ ( ) b V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a 2 39

Assuming the excitation of A by V post is very small, we can write χ ( ) b V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a = Φ A χ ( ) b Φ A V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a Then we get d 2 σ inc de b dω b = K Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a V post, Φ A χ ( ) b Φ A δ(e i E b (T x + H A + V xa )) Φ A χ ( ) b Φ A V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a = K Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a V post, Φ A χ ( ) b Φ A δ(ω T x V xa ) Φ A χ ( ) b Φ A V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a where is the energy transfer ω = E a + ϵ a E b 40

Introducing the Green s function of x 1 G x (ω) = Φ A ω (T x + V xa ) + iδ Φ A 1 = ω T x U x + iδ with Optical potential of x on A U x = V x + iw x All excitations of A are included through U. Inclusive breakup cross section where d 2 σ inc de b dω b = K π Im d 3 r x d 3 r x S (r x)g x (r x, r x )S(r x ) S(r x ) = r x χ ( ) b Φ A V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a G x (r x, r x ; ω) = r x G x (ω) r x 41

[Comment] About the relation 1 Φ A ω (T x + V xa ) + iδ Φ A = Note Set 1 ω T x U x + iδ 1 Φ A ω (T x + V xa ) + iδ Φ A 1 Φ A ω (T x + V xa ) + iδ Φ A P = Φ A Φ A, Q = 1 P, ω + = ω + iδ By short manupulation = = 1 P ω + (T x + V xa ) P P ω + 1 T x P V xa P P V xa Q 1 ω + T x U x ω + T x QV xa Q QV xap [Excersize] When AB = 1, express P BP by P AP, P AQ, QAP, QAQ 42

3. Decomposition of elastic and non-elastic breakup An identity of the Green s function ImG x = (1 + G xu x)im [ G (0) ] x (1 + Ux G x ) + G xw x G x where Use G (0) x = 1 ω T x + iδ we get ImG (0) x = k k δ(ω k2 2m x ) k = k (1 + G xu x)im [ G (0) ] (1 + Ux G x ) χ ( ) k δ x ω k2 2m x χ ( ) k A. Kasano and M. Ichimura, PL 115B, 81(1982) 43

Now the first term gives Elastic Breakup Cross Section d 2 σ EBU de b dω b = K k χ ( ) k χ ( ) b Φ A V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a 2 δ(ω k2 2m x ) Consequently the seond term gives Non-elastic Breakup Cross Section where d 2 σ NEB de b dω b = K π ψ x W x ψ x ψ x (r) = G x χ ( ) b Φ A V post Φ A ϕ a χ (+) a = G x (r, r ; ω)s(r )d 3 r This formalism is called IAV model M. Ichimura, N. Austern and C.M. Vincent, Phys. Rev. C32, 431(1985) 44

4. Applications Jin Lei and A.M. Moro, PR C92, 044616(2015) d 2 σ/de p dω p (mb/sr MeV) d 2 σ/de p dω p (mb/sr MeV) 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0 20 40 60 80 θ lab (deg) 100 (b) θ 80 p =8 ο 60 40 20 58 Ni(d,pX) @ Ed =100 MeV EBU (CDCC) NEB (FR-DWBA) Total D. Ridikas et al. EBU (CDCC) NEB (FR-DWBA) PE+CN Total (a) E p =50 MeV 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 E p (MeV) FIG. 4. (Color online) Double differential cross section of protons emitted in the 58 Ni(d,pX) reaction at E d = 100 MeV in the laboratory frame. (a) Proton angular distribution for a fixed proton energy of E p = 50 MeV. (b) Energy distribution for protons emitted at a laboratory angle of 8 (arrow in top figure). The meaning of the lines is the same as in Fig. 3, and are also indicated by the labels. Experimental data are from Ref. [44]. 45

209 Bi ( 6 Li, αx) 46