arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 23 Nov 2009

Similar documents
ON SOME PARTITIONS OF A FLAG MANIFOLD. G. Lusztig

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

Representations and Linear Actions

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

Exercises on chapter 1

arxiv: v2 [math.rt] 19 Mar 2008

Character Sheaves and GGGRs

Notes on Green functions

Character Sheaves and GGGRs

Representations Are Everywhere

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition

Character sheaves and modular generalized Springer correspondence Part 2: The generalized Springer correspondence

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

On the geometric Langlands duality

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

Character sheaves and modular generalized Springer correspondence Part 2: The generalized Springer correspondence

Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules

294 Meinolf Geck In 1992, Lusztig [16] addressed this problem in the framework of his theory of character sheaves and its application to Kawanaka's th

Toshiaki Shoji (Nagoya University) Character sheaves on a symmetric space and Kostka polynomials July 27, 2012, Osaka 1 / 1

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties

We can choose generators of this k-algebra: s i H 0 (X, L r i. H 0 (X, L mr )

Spherical varieties and arc spaces

On Mordell-Lang in Algebraic Groups of Unipotent Rank 1

Finite Subgroups of Gl 2 (C) and Universal Deformation Rings

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

Representations with Iwahori-fixed vectors Paul Garrett garrett/ 1. Generic algebras

Math 594. Solutions 5

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

Some algebraic properties of. compact topological groups

Cover Page. Author: Yan, Qijun Title: Adapted deformations and the Ekedahl-Oort stratifications of Shimura varieties Date:

School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5824 Topics in Groups. Problem Sheet I: Revision and Re-Activation

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

The Affine Grassmannian

GEOMETRIC SATAKE, SPRINGER CORRESPONDENCE, AND SMALL REPRESENTATIONS

3. G. Groups, as men, will be known by their actions. - Guillermo Moreno

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

SOME PROPERTIES OF CHARACTER SHEAVES. Anne-Marie Aubert. Dedicated to the memory of Olga Taussky-Todd. 1. Introduction.

Notes on Partial Resolutions of Nilpotent Varieties by Borho and Macpherson

Notes on D 4 May 7, 2009

FAMILIES OF IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF S 2 S 3

Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press

Algebra-I, Fall Solutions to Midterm #1

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

FINITE GROUP THEORY: SOLUTIONS FALL MORNING 5. Stab G (l) =.

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

A partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

The Hecke category (part II Satake equivalence)

FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE AND THEIR

Characters of the Negative Level Highest-Weight Modules for Affine Lie Algebras

A Criterion for Flatness of Sections of Adjoint Bundle of a Holomorphic Principal Bundle over a Riemann Surface

LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES

Representation Theory

GEOMETRIC CLASS FIELD THEORY I

NilBott Tower of Aspherical Manifolds and Torus Actions

`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009

(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)

Equivariant Algebraic K-Theory

THE p-smooth LOCUS OF SCHUBERT VARIETIES. Let k be a ring and X be an n-dimensional variety over C equipped with the classical topology.

THE HITCHIN FIBRATION

Proof of Geometric Langlands for GL(2), I

12. Projective modules The blanket assumptions about the base ring k, the k-algebra A, and A-modules enumerated at the start of 11 continue to hold.

Galois to Automorphic in Geometric Langlands

BRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

New York Journal of Mathematics. Cohomology of Modules in the Principal Block of a Finite Group

SYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS

Hodge Structures. October 8, A few examples of symmetric spaces

Math 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups

Notation. For any Lie group G, we set G 0 to be the connected component of the identity.

MA441: Algebraic Structures I. Lecture 26

The Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 17 Apr 2015

Braid group actions on categories of coherent sheaves

Two subgroups and semi-direct products

IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTICS: 3. Modular varieties with Hecke symmetries. 7. Foliation and a conjecture of Oort

10 l-adic representations

ON ORBIT CLOSURES OF SYMMETRIC SUBGROUPS IN FLAG VARIETIES

Another proof of the global F -regularity of Schubert varieties

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Cuspidality and Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters

1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results

D-MATH Algebra II FS18 Prof. Marc Burger. Solution 21. Solvability by Radicals

SEMI-GROUP AND BASIC FUNCTIONS

Lectures on Springer theories and orbital integrals

Permutation groups/1. 1 Automorphism groups, permutation groups, abstract

The Major Problems in Group Representation Theory

Tilting exotic sheaves, parity sheaves on affine Grassmannians, and the Mirković Vilonen conjecture

On Levi subgroups and the Levi decomposition for groups definable in o-minimal structures

Demushkin s Theorem in Codimension One

ON AN INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL GROUP OVER A FINITE FIELD. A. M. Vershik, S. V. Kerov

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

1. Group Theory Permutations.

Margulis Superrigidity I & II

RECOLLECTION THE BRAUER CHARACTER TABLE

BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)

Transcription:

PARABOLIC CHARACTER SHEAVES, III arxiv:0911.4318v1 [math.rt] 23 Nov 2009 G. Lusztig 1. A decomposition of G δ /U P 1.1. Let k be an algebraically closed field. In this paper an algebraic variety (or algebraic group) is always assumed to be over k. More generally we will consider ind-varieties. An ind-variety is an increasing union X = i N X i of algebraic varieties X i under closed imbeddings j i : X i X i+1. (The sequence (X i ) can be replaced by a sequence (X i ) such that each X i is a closed subvariety of some X j and each X i is a closed subvariety of some X j. This change leads to the same indvariety.) An algebraic subvariety of X is by definition an algebraic subvariety of X i for some i. We fix a prime number l invertible in k. For X as above we can define the category of perverse sheaves on X. Its objects are collections K = (K i ) i i0 where K i is a Q l -perverse sheaf on X i for i i 0, such that K i+1 = j i! K i for any i i 0. (The support of K is by the definition the support of K i for i i 0. K is said to be simple if K i is simple for i i 0.) The main purpose of this paper is to define a class of simple perverse sheaves (called character sheaves) on certain ind-varieties associated to a loop group. This has applications to a geometric construction of certain affine Hecke algebras with unequal parameters (an affine analogue of a construction in [L4]), as will be shown elsewhere. Let l = k((ǫ)) where ǫ is an indeterminate. Let G be a connected semisimple almost simple algebraic group. Let G = G(l) and let G be the derived group of G. A subgroup of G is said to be parahoric if it contains some Iwahori subgroup and is not equal to G. Let P be a parahoric subgroup of G. Note that P can be naturally regarded as a proalgebraic group; it has a canonical normal subgroup U P which is prounipotent and the quotient P/U P is naturally a connected reductive algebraic group. Now G /U P can be viewed naturally as an ind-variety; indeed G /U P is fibred over G /P (which is known to be an ind-variety) with fibres isomorphic with the algebraic variety P/U P. Note that P acts on G /U P by p : gu P pgp 1 U P. In this paper we define a class of simple perverse sheaves (character sheaves) on G /U P ; these are are certain P-equivariant simple perverse sheaves on G /U P supported by P-stable algebraic subvarieties (on which P acts Supported in part by the National Science Foundation 1 Typeset by AMS-TEX

2 G. LUSZTIG algebraically through a quotient which is an algebraic group). The key to the definition of character sheaves on G /U P is a decomposition of G /U P into P- stable smooth algebraic subvarieties indexed by a subset of the affine Weyl group. This decomposition is the affine analogue of a decomposition which appeared in [L1]; the character sheaves that we define are affine analogues of the parabolic character sheaves of [L1] (see also [L2]). We will actually consider character sheaves on an ind-variety slightly more general that G /U P, namely G δ /U P where δ is an element of the finite abelian group D = G/G and G δ is the inverse image of δ under the obvious map G D. Now many of the results in [L1, 3] remain valid (with the same proof) if G, G 1 are replaced by G, G δ, Borel is replaced by Iwahori and parabolic is replaced by parahoric. We will sometime refer to a result in [L1] such as [L1, 3.2] by [L1, 3.2 ] with the understanding that the replacements in the previous sentence are made. Notation. If P, Q are parahoric subgroups of G then so is P Q = (P Q)U P and we have U (P Q ) = U P (P U Q ). We say that P, Q are in good position if P Q = P or equivalently Q P = Q. 1.2. Let B be the set of all Iwahori subgroups of G (they are actually contained in G ). Let W be the set of G -orbits on B B (G acts by conjugation on both factors). For B, B B we write pos(b, B ) = w if the G -orbit of (B, B ) is w. If w W and pos(b, B ) = w then B/(B B ) is an algebraic variety of dimension say l(w). Let I = {w W ; l(w) = 1}. There is a well defined group structure on W in which the elements of I have order 2 and in which the following property holds: if pos(b, B ) = w 1, pos(b, B ) = w 2 and l(w 1 w 2 ) = l(w 1 ) + l(w 2 ) then pos(b, B ) = w 1 w 2. This makes W into an infinite Coxeter group (an affine Weyl group) in which the length function is w l(w). For J I let W J be the (finite) subgroup of W generated by J. For J I, K I let K W,W J, K W J be as in [L1, 2.1] (with W replaced by W ). If P is a parahoric subgroup of G, the set of all w W such that w = pos(b, B ) for some B, B B, B P, B P is of the form W J for a well defined subset J I. We then say that P is of type J. For J I let P J be the set of all parahoric subgroups of type J. Then G acts transitively (by conjugation) on P J. For P P J, Q P K, there is a well defined element u = pos(p, Q) J W K such that pos(b, B ) u (standard partial order on W ) for any B, B B, B P, B Q and pos(b 1, B 1 ) = u for some B 1, B 1 B, B 1 P, B 1 Q; we then have B 1 P Q, B 1 QP. We have P Q P J Ad(u)K. Also, (P, Q) u defines a bijection between the set of G -orbits on P J P K and J W K. 1.3. Throughout this paper we fix δ D. There is a unique automorphism of W (denoted again by δ) such that δ(i) = I and such that for any J I, any P P J and any g G δ we have gpg 1 P δ(j). In this subsection we recall some results of Bédard [B] (see also [L1, 2]). For any J I let T (J, δ) be the set of all sequences t = (J n, w n ) n 0 where J = J 0 J 1 J 2... and w 0, w 1,... are

PARABOLIC CHARACTER SHEAVES, III 3 elements of W such that [L1, 2.2(a)-(d)] hold (with W, δ instead of W, ǫ). For (J n, w n ) n 0 T (J, δ) we have J n = J n+1 = = J, w n = w n+1 = = w for n large and Ad(w )J = δ(j ). Moreover, (J n, w n ) n 0 w is a bijection (a) T (J, δ) δ(j) W. 1.4. We fix J I. Let Z J,δ = {(P, P, gu P ); P P J, P P δ(j), gu P G δ /U P, gpg 1 = P }. To any (P, P, gu P ) Z J,δ we associate a sequence (J n, w n ) n 0 with J n I, w n W, and a sequence (P n, P n, gu P n) Z Jn,δ. We set P 0 = P, P 0 = P, J 0 = J, w 0 = pos(p 0, P 0 ). Assume that n 1, that P m, P m, J m, w m are already defined for m < n and that w m = pos(p m, P m ) for m < n, (P m, P m, gu P m) Z Jm,δ for m < n. Let J n = J n 1 δ 1 Ad(w n 1 )(J n 1 ), P n = g 1 ((P n 1 ) P n 1 )g P Jn, P n = (P n 1 ) P n 1 P δ(jn ), w n = pos(p n, P n ) δ(j n) W J n. Note that gu P n is well defined by gu P n 1 since P n P n 1 hence U P n 1 U P n. This completes the inductive definition. Note that P = P 0 P 1... and P = P 0 P 1... hence (P n, P n ) is independent of n for large n. From [L1, 3.2(c) ] (with P, P, Z replaced by P n 1, P n 1, P n ) we see that w n w n 1 W J n 1 for n 1. Thus, (J n, w n ) n 0 T (J, δ). We write (J n, w n ) n 0 = β (P, P, gu P ). For t T (J, δ) we set The G -action on Z J,δ given by t Z J,δ = {(P, P, gu P ) Z J,δ ; β (P, P, gu P ) = t}. h : (P, P, gu P ) (hph 1, hp h 1, hgh 1 U hph 1) preserves the subset t Z J,δ. Clearly, ( t Z J,δ ) t T (J,δ) is a partition of Z J,δ. 1.5. Let J I. Let P P J. The inclusion a : G δ /U P Z J,δ, a(gu P ) = (P, gpg 1, gu P ) is P-equivariant where P acts on G δ /U P by p : gu P pgp 1 U P and on Z J,δ by restriction of the G -action. For any t T (J, δ) we set t G δ /U P = a 1 ( t Z J,δ ). Clearly, ( t G δ /U P ) t T (J,δ) is a partition of G δ /U P into P-stable subsets. For example, if J =, P B and we identify T (, δ) = W as in 1.3(a), then for w W we have w G δ /U B = {gu B G δ /U B ; pos(gbg 1, B) = w}.

4 G. LUSZTIG 1.6. Let t Z J,δ. For any r 0 let t r = (J n, w n ) n r T (J r, δ). Consider the sequence of G -equivariant maps (a) t 0 Z J0,δ ϑ 0 t 1 Z J1,δ ϑ 1 t 2 Z J2,δ where for r 0 and any (P, P, gu P ) t r Z Jr,δ we set ϑ 2... ϑ r (Q, Q, gu Q ) (g 1 (Q Q )g, Q Q, gu g 1 (Q Q )g) t r+1 Z Jr+1,δ. Note that for sufficiently large r, ϑ r is the identity map. (Recall that J r = J r+1 = = J, w r = w r+1 = = w for r large and Ad(w )(J ) = δ(j ).) Note that (b) each fibre of ϑ r is isomorphic to the affine space (U Q U Q )\(U Q Q ) (a closed subset of the algebraic variety U Q \Q ) where (Q, Q ) P Jr P δ(jr ), pos(q, Q) = w r. (See [L1, 3.12(b) ].) Also, (c) the map induced by ϑ r from the set of G -orbits on t r Z Jr,δ to the set of G -orbits on t r+1 Z Jr+1,δ is a bijection. (See [L1, 3.12(c) ].) Let P P J. For any r 0 we set r = {(Q, Q, gu Q ) t r Z Jr,δ; Q P }. Now P acts on r by restriction of the G -action on t r Z Jr,δ. We have a cartesian diagram c r r t r Z Jr,δ b r ϑ r c r+1 r+1 t r+1 Z Jr+1,δ where c r, c r+1 are the obvious inclusions and b r is the restriction of ϑ r. Using this and (b) we see that (d) each fibre of the P-equivariant map b r : r r+1 is isomorphic to the affine space (U Q U Q )\(U Q Q ) where (Q, Q ) P Jr P δ(jr ), pos(q, Q) = w r. We show: (e) the map induced by b r from the set of P-orbits on r to the set of P-orbits on r+1 is a bijection. The cartesian map above induces a commutative diagram (P orbits on r ) (G orbits on t r Z Jr,δ) (P orbits on r+1 ) (G orbits on t r+1 Z Jr+1,δ) The horizontal maps are clearly bijections. The right vertical map is a bijection by (c). It follows that the left vertical map is a bijection. This proves (e). If k is replaced by a finite field F q with q elements and if the Frobenius map acts trivially on W, δ, then t G δ /U P becomes a finite set with cardinal equal to (P/U P )q l(w) where w δ(j) W corresponds to t under 1.3(a). (This is seen by an argument similar to that in [L2, 8.20].)

PARABOLIC CHARACTER SHEAVES, III 5 1.7. We now make a digression. Let L be a group and let E be a set with a free transitive left L-action (l, e) le, and a free transitive right L-action (e, l) el such that (le)l = l(el ) for l, l L, e E. For any e E we define a map τ e : L L by τ e (l)e = el. Note that τ e is a group automorphism of L. Assume further that E 0 := {e E; τe N = 1 for some N 1} is nonempty. Let e 0 E 0 and let d 1 be such that τe d 0 = 1. We consider the group Lγ d (semidirect product) where γ d is the cyclic group of order d with generator ω and ωl = τ e0 (l)ω for any l L. Define a bijection f : E Lω (Lω is an L-coset in Lγ d ) by le 0 lω. For any l L, e E we have f(lel 1 ) = lf(e)l 1 (in the right side we use the group structure of Lγ d ). Thus, the set E with the L-action l : e lel 1 is isomorphic to the coset Lω in Lγ d with the L-action given by L-conjugacy in the group structure of Lγ d. 1.8. We return to the setup in 1.6. For r 0 sufficiently large, t r is independent of r; we denote it by t. We have t = (J n, w n ) n 0 where J n = J, w n = w for all n 0 and Ad(w )(J ) = δ(j ). It follows that where t Z J,δ = {(Q, Q, gu Q ); (Q, Q ) O, gu Q G δ /U Q, gqg 1 = Q } O = {(Q, Q ) P J P δ(j ); pos(q, Q) = w }. Note that any Q, Q with (Q, Q ) O are in good position. Hence := {(Q, Q, gu Q ); (Q, Q ) O, gu Q G δ /U Q, gqg 1 = Q, Q P }. We have maps e e where = {(Q, Q ) O; Q P }, = {Q P J ; Q P }, e(q, Q, gu Q ) = (Q, Q ), e (Q, Q ) = Q. We can regard,, as smooth algebraic varieties so that is isomorphic to a partial flag manifold P/Q (where Q ) of P/U P, e is an affine space bundle and e is a fibration with fibres isomorphic to Q/U Q (where Q ). We can regard 0, 1, 2,... as smooth algebraic varieties such that b r : r r+1 is an affine space bundle for any r 0 (note that r = for r large is a smooth algebraic variety). We can identify t G δ /U P with 0 by gu P (P, gpg 1, gu P ). It follows that t G δ /U P = 0 is naturally a smooth algebraic variety, an iterated affine space bundle over via the map b :=...b 2 b 1 b 0 : t G δ /U P. In fact, it is an algebraic subvariety of the ind-variety G δ /U P. Now the P-action on induces a transitive P-action on. Hence if we fix (Q, Q ) and we set E = {gu Q G δ /U Q, gqg 1 = Q }, we have a P- equivariant isomorphism χ : P Q Q E, (p, gu Q ) (pqp 1, pq p 1, pgp 1 U pqp 1).

6 G. LUSZTIG Let L t = (Q Q )/(U Q U Q ). Since Q, Q are in good position, the obvious i i homomorphisms Q/U Q L t Q /U Q are isomorphisms. Note that the (Q Q )-action on E given by h : gu Q hgh 1 U Q factors through an L t -action (called conjugation ). On E we have a free transitive right L t -action given by l : gu Q gu Q l = gqu Q (where qu Q = i(l)) and a free transitive left L t -action given by l : gu Q l gu Q = q gu Q (where q U Q = i (l)), so that the conjugation L t -action above is l : gu Q l gu Q l 1. The left and right L t -actions on E satisfy the hypotheses of 1.7 with L = L t. Hence, by 1.7, the conjugation L t -action on E is isomorphic to the L t -action on the connected component C t = L t ω of a semidirect product L t γ d (an algebraic group with identity component L t and with cyclic group of components γ d of order d with generator ω). Thus χ can be viewed as an isomorphism χ : P Q Q C t where Q Q acts on C t via its quotient L t, by conjugation. This isomorphism induces a bijection between the set of P-orbits on and the set of P-orbits on P Q Q C t which can be naturally identified with the set of L t -orbits (for conjugation) on C t. Composing this with the bijections in 1.6(e) we obtain a bijection between the set of P-orbits on t G δ /U P = 0 and the set L t \C t of L t -orbits (for conjugation) on C t. Putting together these bijections (for various t) we obtain a bijection between the set of P-orbits on G δ /U P and the set t T (J,δ) L t \C t. 1.9. Let V be a 2-dimensional vector space over l = k((ǫ)) with a fixed volume element ω. Let A = k[[ǫ]]. Let X be the set of all A-lattice in V. Let X be the set of all L X such that for some A-basis e 1, e 2 of L we have e 1 e 2 = ω. Then G = SL(V ) acts transitively on X. Let L X and let P = {g G; gl = L}. Note that G = G is as in 1.1 and P is a parahoric subgroup of G. In our case the set G /U P may be identified with the set Y of all pairs (L, g) where L X and g is an isomorphism of k-vector spaces L/ǫL L /ǫl preserving the volume elements induced by ω. We have a partition Y = n N Y n where Y n = {(L, g) Y ; dim k L/(L L ) = n}. If n > 0 then Y n has a further partition Y n = Y n Y n defined as folows. Let (L, g) Y n. Let L 1 be the unique lattice in X such that L L L 1 L, dim L/L 1 = 1 and let L 2 be the unique lattice in X such that L L L 2 L, dim L /L 2 = 1. Let L 1 = L 1 /ǫl 0 (a line in L/ǫL) and let L 2 = L 2 /ǫl (a line in L /ǫl ). We say that (L, g) Y n if g( L 1 ) = L 2 ; we say that (L, g) Y n if g( L 1 ) L 2. This defines the partition of Y n. The subvarieties Y 0, Y n(n > 0), Y n (n > 0) are precisely the pieces t G /U P of Y = G /U P. If k is replaced by a finite field F q with q elements then Y 0, Y n, Y n become finite sets with cardinal q(q 2 1), q 2n (q 2 1), q 2n+1 (q 2 1) respectively. 2. Character sheaves on G δ /U P 2.1. We preserve the setup of 1.8. Let K be a character sheaf on C t (the definition of [L3] applies since C t is a connected component of an algebraic group whose

PARABOLIC CHARACTER SHEAVES, III 7 identity component is L t, a reductive algebraic group). Then K is (Q Q )- equivariant where Q Q acts on C t through its quotient L t and there is a well defined P-equivariant simple perverse sheaf K on P Q Q C t such that h 1 K = h 1 h 2 K up to shift (here P Q Q C h t P/(UQ U Q ) C 2 t Ct are the obvious maps). Now K can be viewed as a P-equivariant simple perverse sheaf on (via χ ). Since b : t G δ /U P is a P-equivariant iterated affine space bundle we deduce that b K [d] is a P-equivariant simple perverse sheaf on t G δ /U P (for a well defined d Z). Let t G δ /U P be the closure of t G δ /U P in G δ /U P (a P-stable algebraic subvariety of G δ /U P ). Let ˆK be the simple perverse sheaf on t G δ /U P whose restriction to t G δ /U P is b K [d]. We can view ˆK as a simple perverse sheaf on G δ /U P with support contained in t G δ /U P. Let C P,δ be the class of simple perverse sheaves on G δ /U P consisting of all ˆK as above (for various t). The set of isomorphism classes in C P,δ is in bijection with the set of pairs (t, K) where t T (J, δ) and K is a character sheaf on C t (up to isomorphism). The objects of C P,δ are called character sheaves on G δ /U P. 2.2. Let J J I and let P P J, Q P J be such that P Q. Consider the diagram G δ f 1 f 2 f 3 f 4 /U P E1 E2 E3 G δ /U Q where E 1 = Q/U Q G δ /U P, E 2 = {(P, gu P ) P J G δ /U P ; P Q}, E 3 = {(P, gu Q ) P J G δ /U Q ; P Q} are ind-varieties and f 1 (xu Q, gu P ) = gu P, f 2 (xu Q, gu P ) = (xpx 1, xgx 1 U xpx 1), f 3 (P, gu Q ) = (P, gu P ), f 4 (P, gu Q ) = gu Q. Note that f 1 is a principal fibration with group Q/U Q ; f 2 is a principal fibration with group P/U Q ; f 3 is an affine space bundle with fibres isomorphic to U P /U Q ; f 4 is a proper map. Below we shall extend in an obvious way the standard operations for derived categories of Ql -sheaves on algebraic varieties to the case of ind-varieties. Let K C P,δ. Then f 1K[d 1 ] = f 2K [d 2 ] for a well defined simple perverse sheaf K on E 2. Here d 1 = dimq/u Q, d 2 = dim P/U Q. We set ind(k) = f 4! f 3 K. By the decomposition theorem, ind(k) is a direct sum of simple perverse sheaves (with shifts) on G δ /U Q. More precisely, it is a direct sum of character sheaves (with shifts) on G δ /U Q. (This is shown by arguments similar to those in [L1, 4, 6].) Conversely, for any character sheaf K on G δ /U Q there exists a character sheaf K on G δ /U P (where P is an Iwahori subgroup contained in Q) such that some shift of K is a direct summand of ind(k). (This is shown by arguments similar to those in [L1, 4].) References [B] R.Bédard, On the Brauer liftings for modular representations, J.Algebra 93 (1985), 332-

8 G. LUSZTIG 353. [L1] G.Lusztig, Parabolic character sheaves I, Mosc.Math.J. 4 (2004), 153-179. [L2] G.Lusztig, Parabolic character sheaves II, Mosc.Math.J. 4 (2004), 869-896. [L3] G.Lusztig, Character sheaves on disconnected groups VI, Represent.Th. 8 (2004), 377-413. [L4] G.Lusztig, Character sheaves on disconnected groups VIII, Represent.Th. 10 (2006), 314-352. Department of Mathematics, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA 02139