Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement: Study Results and Recommendations

Similar documents
Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

Lake Sedimentation Survey of Siloam Springs State Park Lake, Adams County, Illinois

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Section 4: Model Development and Application

Illinois State Water Survey Division

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap

Remaining Capacity in Great Lakes Reservoirs

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

low turbidity high turbidity

B-1. Attachment B-1. Evaluation of AdH Model Simplifications in Conowingo Reservoir Sediment Transport Modeling

2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (# )

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii)

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

Technical Memorandum No

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

Sediment Distribution and Characteristics

Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies. CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610)

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012

Sessom Creek Sand Bar Removal HCP Task 5.4.6

TSEGI WASH 50% DESIGN REPORT

Seagrass Transplantation & Environmental & Marine Consulting Services, Inc. Drew Campbell, Vice President & Lead Scientst.

Appendix O. Sediment Transport Modelling Technical Memorandum

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Lower Susquehanna River Integrated Sediment & Nutrient Monitoring Program

Watershed concepts for community environmental planning

LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

CONCEPTS Conservational Channel Evolution and Pollutant Transport System

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions

Estimated Sediment Volume: Bridge Street Dam Impoundment, Royal River, Yarmouth, Maine

Habitat Monitoring Update Hudson River CAG November 16, 2017

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

CASE STUDIES. Introduction

Griswold Creek August 22, 2013

WQ Outlet Design Single Orifice Orifice diameter = 24. Perforated riser/orifice Plate Outlet area per perforation row = 4

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Hydrology and Hydraulics Design Report. Background Summary

Snead Pond Restoration

Little Swan Lake. Dam Inspection & Siltation Study Prepared By: William Klingner, P.E., CFM October 28, 2018

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

APPENDIX B DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TEMPORARY WATER QUALITY BMPS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION

Summary of Hydraulic and Sediment-transport. Analysis of Residual Sediment: Alternatives for the San Clemente Dam Removal/Retrofit Project,

STREAM RESTORATION AWRA Summer Specialty Conference, GIS and Water Resources IX

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

Appendix E Guidance for Shallow Flooding Analyses and Mapping

Appendix I. Dredged Volume Estimates. Draft Contractor Document: Subject to Continuing Agency Review

C. STUDENT FIELD DATA SHEETS

Appendix K.2: Sediment Management Excerpt from South Orange County Hydromodification Management Plan

Sediment Deposition LET THE RIVER RUN T E A C H E R. Activity Overview. Activity at a Glance. Time Required. Level of Complexity.

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

CCR Rule Annual Inspection Report (cont.) 2

Chapter 10 - Sacramento Method Examples

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION

Tenmile Lakes Delta Building Study

How & Where does infiltration work? Summary of Geologic History Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 6% Sediment Load

Case Study 14. Rocky Creek Vented Box Culvert Ford

Technical Memorandum No Sediment Model

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP

Sediment Control Practices. John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources

Chapter 3 Erosion in the Las Vegas Wash

Agenda. INDOT Office of Environmental Services. Describe Results of FHWA QAR. Landscape and Waterway Permitting Unit. Interviews Site Inspections

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF RETENTION PONDS

The mass of sediment that enters Lake Waynoka tributaries during 0.75-inch, 1.5-inch and 2.5-inch storm events

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

In the space provided, write the letter of the description that best matches the term or phrase. a. any form of water that falls to Earth s

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR VERIFICATION OF CORPS JURISDICTION

Bishopville Prong Study

Assessment of Lake Forest Lake Sediment Trapping Efficiency and Capacity. Marlon R. Cook Groundwater Assessment Program Geological Survey of Alabama

Monitoring of suspended sediment concentration in discharge from regulated lakes in glacial deposits

Science EOG Review: Landforms

Transcription:

Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement: NOVEMBER 11, 2011 Prepared for: Waynoka Property Owners Association Prepared by: Specialists in Ecological & Wetland Consulting 253 N. STATE STREET, SUITE 101 WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43081

LAKE WAYNOKA PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT: TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...iv 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 OBJECTIVES... 4 3 METHODS... 5 3.1 Watershed Investigation... 5 3.2 Water and Sediment Sampling... 5 3.3 Statistical Analyses... 7 3.4 Stormwater Runoff Calculations... 7 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION... 8 4.1 Watershed Investigation... 8 4.2 Water and Sediment Samples... 10 4.3 Stormwater Runoff Rates... 14 5 STUDY CONCLUSIONS... 16 6 RECOMMENDATIONS... 17 6.1 Highest Priority Projects and Tasks... 17 6.1.1 Repair Straight Creek Culvert at Waynoka Drive... 17 6.1.2 Excavate Existing Accumulated Sediment in Straight Creek Cove... 18 6.1.3 Stabilize South Bank of Straight Creek... 19 6.2 Projects and Tasks for Improved Sustainability... 19 6.2.1 Improve and Enforce Community Sediment and Erosion Control Rules... 20 6.2.2 Install Channel Protection at Culvert Outlets... 21 6.2.3 Construct Stormwater Detention Feature at Community Center... 21 6.2.4 Stabilize and Protect Lakeshore... 21 6.2.5 Reduce Sediment Loading from Priority Streams... 22 6.2.5.1 Option: Porous Rock Dam... 23 6.2.5.2 Option: Sediment Forebay... 23 6.2.5.3 Option: Wetland Complex... 24 6.2.5.4 Option: Sediment Collector by Streamside Systems... 25 6.3 Lake Habitat & Fishery Recommendations... 26 6.3.1 Establish and Enhance Shoreline and Aquatic Vegetation... 26 6.3.2 Supplement Fish Community through Stocking... 28 7 SUMMARY... 30 REFERENCES... 31 Tables Figures Appendices

Table LIST OF TABLES 1 Dates and Sizes of Storms and Subsequent Sampling Dates... 6 2 Lake Waynoka Drainage Areas and Stormwater Runoff Volumes... 14 3 Recommended Shoreline and Aquatic Plants for Lake Waynoka... 28 4 Recommended Fish Species for Re-stocking Lake Waynoka... 29 Figure LIST OF FIGURES 1 Water and Sediment Sample Locations... 3 2 Lake Waynoka Watershed Boundary... 9 3 Average TOC Values at Upstream and Downstream Locations (±SE) for Sampled Coves in Lake Waynoka... 10 4 Average Percent Organic Matter (±SE) Present in Lake Waynoka Sediment Samples... 11 5 Average TSS Values at Upstream and Downstream Locations (±SE) for Sampled Coves in Lake Waynoka... 13 6 The Volume of Stormwater Runoff Entering Lake Waynoka Tributaries during 0.75-inch, 1.5-inch and 2.5-inch Storm Events... 15 7 The Mass of Sediment that Enters Lake Waynoka Tributaries during 0.75-inch, 1.5-inch and 2.5- inch Storm Events... 16 Appendix LIST OF APPENDICES A B C D E F G Lake Waynoka Bathymetric Mapping Summary Raw Water Sample Data from Advanced Analytics Raw Sediment Sample Data from S & S Analytics Photograph Log On-the-Ground Watershed Investigation Observations Sediment Core Observations Streamside Systems Sediment Removal without Dredging: Description and Cost Estimate Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement ii

LIST OF ACRONYMS USED ADP ANOVA CAD CF CFS, cfs EPA HydroCAD LAC lf MAD NRCS OM SCS S&S SE TOC TSS ųm U.S. USACE USEPA WPOA Acoustic Doppler Profiler Analysis of Variance Computer Aided Design cubic feet cubic feet per Second Environmental Protection Agency Computer Aided Design program for hydrology calculations Lake Advisory Committee linear foot MAD Scientist & Associates LLC Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the SCS) organic matter Soil Conservation Service S&S Analytics (subcontracted laboratory) Standard Error total organic carbon total suspended solids micron (micrometer) United States of America United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Environmental Protection Agency Waynoka Property Owners Association Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lake Waynoka is a private, man-made lake located in northeast Brown County, Ohio. In 2003, concern was raised over the amount of sediment accumulating in the main tributary to the lake and the area was subsequently excavated. In 2010, sediment accumulation had again become problematic and a decision was made to seek a more sustainable solution than continual excavation. MAD Scientist & Associates (MAD) was contracted by the Lake Advisory Committee (LAC) of the Waynoka Property Owners Association (WPOA) in the winter of 2011 to conduct a bathymetric analysis of Lake Waynoka, to determine whether sediment accumulation had significantly altered lake depths from their original 1970 contours. After completing bathymetric analysis, MAD concluded that sediment accumulation had not significantly altered contours within most areas of the lake, and that the 1961 topographic map remains a reasonably accurate reflection of the lake s bathymetry. However, sediment was noted to be accumulating in some of the coves, causing these coves to become too shallow for boat traffic. General observations and preliminary water sampling conducted during the bathymetric analysis phase pointed to seven coves as the primary sources of sediment input. MAD was subsequently contracted to conduct a thorough sampling and analysis of the water and sediment in the seven select coves of Lake Waynoka and to provide recommendations for sediment and erosion control, as well as removal and prevention of incoming sediment. Water and sediment sampling and analysis were carried out over the summer of 2011 with assistance from the chairman of the LAC, George Kinney. Methods for stabilizing the severely-eroded south slope of Straight Creek cove were evaluated by the engineering firm Stone Environmental Engineering & Science (Stone), subcontracted by MAD to assist in the engineering analysis for this study. The amount of organic matter present in the water column was found to be within the range, although on the high end, of U.S. lakes. Of the sampled coves, Cove 4 (Kiddie Corral) had the most organic matter present in the sediment, which corresponded with observations made during the winter drawdown. Straight Creek and Cove 8 were found to contribute the most stormwater (and consequently the most sediment) to the lake, with Straight Creek far exceeding Cove 8. Based on the results of these studies, reducing the amount of sediment entering Lake Waynoka will be best done by targeting controls on Straight Creek and secondarily on Cove 8. Several high-priority action items have been discussed in the recommendations section of the report, which include excavation of sediment, stabilization of the south bank of Straight Creek cove and repair of the Waynoka Drive culvert. In addition, recommendations are provided for reducing erosion and sediment runoff throughout Lake Waynoka s watershed and for improving the lake habitat and fishery. Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement iv

LAKE WAYNOKA PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT: 1 INTRODUCTION Lake Waynoka is a man-made lake of 300 surface acres, created in 1970 to provide lake front residential properties in Brown County, Ohio. In 1996, the Waynoka Property Owners Association (WPOA) chartered the Lake Advisory Committee (LAC) to oversee lake management, including water level manipulations, erosion control, shoreline protection, watercraft rules, and initiation of scientific studies of the lake. Straight Creek is the primary tributary to the lake, entering the lake at its uppermost reach after flowing under Waynoka Drive. Severe erosion has occurred along the southern bank of this creek for several years. In November of 2010, the LAC observed that the cove into which Straight Creek flows was filling with sediment and, as a result, becoming too shallow for boat traffic. Seven years prior, this cove had been excavated from the entrance of Straight Creek downstream through the lake for a distance of 500 feet. When the committee was faced with a recurrence of the issue in 2010, it again obtained quotes for excavation and dredging, but decided that a more sustainable approach to regular excavation or dredging of the lake was needed. The chairman of the committee, George Kinney, suggested that a Request for Proposal be written to facilitate the hiring of a team of environmental professionals to help the LAC assess current lake conditions and develop a long-term, sustainable strategy for lake improvement and maintenance. MAD Scientist & Associates (MAD), a firm that specializes in wetland and ecological consulting and strives to provide sustainable solutions for its clients, was retained in the winter of 2011 to complete this study. MAD s initial contract with the WPOA was to conduct bathymetric mapping of the lake and to develop a study plan that would identify sources and types of sediment within Lake Waynoka. Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement

In April, 2011, MAD evaluated the bathymetry of the lake bottom using a combination of a highly-accurate Acoustic Doppler Profiler (ADP) system known as the RiverSurveyor and a hand-held depth sonde. Details of the mapping and reconnaissance activity are included in the report addressed to George Kinney dated May 17, 2011 (Appendix A). Based on a comparison of the 1961 topographic elevations and the current lake bottom elevations, Lake Waynoka appears to be reasonably stable. Direct observations made by the team during field data collection also support this conclusion. Almost all measured locations have current elevations that are within 10 feet of the original 1961 topography, and only one quarter of the transects were found to have elevations that differ by more than five feet from 1961. Because overt changes in water depths were not observed, the 1961 map is deemed to remain the most accurate map available for interpretation of water depths across the lake. It is important to note that, although the water depths measured in some of the coves did not significantly differ from the original water depths, they are very shallow and are likely to become shallower if subjected to high sediment loading from upstream. In addition, particular problem areas for sediment accumulation have already been observed by the LAC. During the mapping period, a significant storm occurred which delayed mapping, but allowed MAD to collect water samples during a high flow event. Thirteen lake samples were collected on April 12, 2011, which were analyzed for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) concentrations, to provide an indication of where sediment accumulation may present the greatest potential problems for Lake Waynoka property owners. Of the 13 coves sampled, four had very high concentrations of TSS, 87-450 mg/l, (Kiddie Corral, Cove 6, Straight Creek, and Cove 8), and an additional three coves (Sioux Cove, Cove 11 and Cove 13) had somewhat high concentrations of TSS, 29-38 mg/l. These seven coves were targeted for additional study and are the focus of this report. The coves have been assigned numbers for ease of identification as shown on Figure 1. Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement 2

Cove 8 up down Cove 9 up Cove 11 Cove 10 Quachita down Cove 12 Cove 13 up Red cloud down down Sioux Cove Cove 6 up Straight Creek Cove 3 Horseshoe Cove down up Cove 4 Kiddie Cove Cove 1 SquawValley Cove 2 Little Turle = coves to be sampled in study phase 0200 700 1200 FT Figure 1. Water and Sediment Sample Locations Source of Aerial: Google Earth Pro Lake Waynoka, Brown County, OH Created By: JM Revised: 7-7-2011

Following completion of the first phase of work, MAD was contracted in June of 2011 to carry out the proposed study plan. This study plan included collecting water samples to be analyzed for TSS to determine how much sediment is entering the lake from each targeted tributary (based on concentration and estimated discharge in cubic feet per second, cfs, for each respective storm event), and for total organic carbon (TOC) to determine what percentage of the suspended solids are organic particles. TSS refers to the amount of sediment floating in the water column, and is what makes the water appear cloudy. Suspended sediment primarily consists of silt, but contains some very fine sand. Clay particles are too small to be measured with the TSS method. TOC is the amount of organic carbon molecules larger than 0.45 microns (ųm), which gives an idea of how much organic material is present in the water column. In this study, MAD also collected sediment samples which were analyzed for the percent of organic matter present in them, which will provide an indication of whether sediment accretion is primarily from the accumulation of detritus (mostly leaves and other plant debris) or eroded soil. At Lake Waynoka, primary sources of organic material include lakeside vegetation, such as fallen leaves and algae, and debris and livestock waste that washes in from agricultural areas. Sediment cores were also collected to obtain information on the amount of accumulated sediment present in the selected coves. 2 OBJECTIVES Based on the initial water sampling, bathymetric mapping, and discussions with the LAC, the following objectives were established for this study: Determine the amount of sediment entering the lake from the seven coves of concern, and assess whether the source is primarily erosion of exposed soils, or an accumulation of plant debris on the lake bottom that is re-suspended in storm events; Evaluate potential erosion control measures for the severely eroded south bank of Straight Creek; Analyze the potential for a created wetland and/or sedimentation forebay located near Waynoka Drive to reduce inflowing sediment from Straight Creek; Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement 4

Create a list of recommended native submerged vegetation appropriate for providing fish habitat; and Determine the best method(s) for re-establishing vegetation within the lake. In addition, MAD was asked to provide general recommendations regarding fish species for restocking. 3 METHODS 3.1 Watershed Investigation Aerial photographs and topographic maps were used as preliminary investigation tools to determine possible sediment source areas for Lake Waynoka. After likely sediment source areas were determined, an on-the-ground watershed investigation was conducted on July 7, 2011, to verify current land conditions. During this investigation, the MAD team also noted the number of active construction sites located along each cove and the presence or absence of erosion control measures. 3.2 Water and Sediment Sampling Water quality samples were collected from each of the seven targeted coves on three different dates in July, when a 48-hour dry period was followed by a rain event of approximately one inch (as estimated by George Kinney and verified with the weather.com website for Hillsboro, Ohio; Table 1). With the exception of Cove 6 and Sioux Cove, all coves had samples collected at a point as close to the head of the cove as could be reached via boat, as well as at a location midway between the head and mouth of the cove (Figure 1). Because Cove 6 and Sioux Cove are relatively small, samples were only collected at the midpoint for these coves. Water temperatures on the sample dates ranged from 83ºF on July 12 to 90ºF on July 19, 2011. During the July 12 sampling, the lake water was turbid (brown in color due to suspended material). On July 19, 14 hours after the storm event, ditches surrounding Lake Waynoka still contained standing water. Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement 5

Table 1. Dates and Sizes of Storms and Subsequent Sampling Dates Storm Date Storm Size Sample Date July 11, 2011- evening 45 minute intense rain July 12, 2011 by 4pm July 16, 2011- midnight ~One inch in one hour July 17, 2011 by 3pm July 18, 2011-8:30-9:30am 2.75 inches in one hour July 19, 2011 by 3pm At each sampling location, three grab samples were collected to provide replication of the sampling procedure. TSS sample bottles were rinsed three times with lake water, submerged under the lake surface, filled with water, capped, and stored in a cooler with ice until they were delivered to the analytical laboratory. TOC bottles were filled in the same manner and capped and stored in a box until they were delivered to the lab. Water samples were analyzed by Advanced Analytics in Columbus, Ohio. Copies of the raw lab results are provided in Appendix B. Lake sediment samples were collected from each of the seven targeted coves on August 3, 2011. Scoops of sediment were collected from three locations within each cove using a combination of sampling devices including a petite ponar dredge (sediment sampling device) and manual scooping of the sediment with a bucket in shallow areas with loose, unconsolidated substrates. The three grab samples were mixed in a fivegallon bucket to reduce variation due to sample location within the cove. Following mixing, three sample bottles were filled with the homogenized mix and sent to S&S Analytics in Findlay, OH for analysis. S&S analyzed the samples for organic matter content and sieved them to determine the proportions of gravel and sand particles present. Copies of the raw lab results are provided in Appendix C. Core samples were also collected from the top one foot (1 ) of the lake bottom, to provide insight into the depositional history of the lake. Cores were collected in areas where the water depth was five feet or less, using a device called a Sludge Judge. The Sludge Judge is traditionally used to sample sludge accumulation in wastewater treatment systems. It consists of a long, three-inch-diameter plastic tube that is pushed Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement 6

into the sediments to the desired, or achievable depth, at which point the end of the pipe above water is capped, creating suction that enables the tube to be pulled out of the water with the core intact. Cores were measured and photographed, and color and texture observations were recorded. 3.3 Statistical Analyses Following field collection and lab analysis of the samples, the data was statistically analyzed to determine where significant differences existed amongst the sampled coves. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to assess differences among the coves at a significance level of p = 0.05. Prior to running the ANOVA, sample distributions were assessed for normality and equal variance. Non-normal distributions were transformed, and if normality could not be achieved through transformation, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Two-sample comparisons were done with t-tests for normal data and Mann-Whitney tests for non-normal data. 3.4 Stormwater Runoff Calculations The volume of runoff that flows into each cove during a storm event was calculated using HydroCAD, which is a Computer Aided Design system for modeling the hydrology and hydraulics of stormwater runoff. It is based largely on the hydrology techniques developed by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS, now named the Natural Resources Conservation Service, NRCS), combined with other hydrology and hydraulics calculations. For a given rainfall event, these techniques are used to generate hydrographs throughout a watershed. Typically, this allows the engineer to verify that a given drainage system is adequate for the area under consideration, or to predict where flooding or erosion is likely to occur. Stormwater runoff rates were calculated for three storm sizes: 0.75-inch, 1.5-inch and 2.5-inch storm events. These storm event sizes were chosen because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses a 0.75-inch event for water quality analysis, and a 2.5-inch storm event is considered a one-year event, or an event that has a 99% chance of occurring every year. Lake Waynoka Protection and Enhancement 7