Classical Statistical Mechanics: Part 1

Similar documents
G : Statistical Mechanics

Introduction. Chapter The Purpose of Statistical Mechanics

UNDERSTANDING BOLTZMANN S ANALYSIS VIA. Contents SOLVABLE MODELS

MACROSCOPIC VARIABLES, THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM. Contents AND BOLTZMANN ENTROPY. 1 Macroscopic Variables 3. 2 Local quantities and Hydrodynamics fields 4

Elements of Statistical Mechanics

Topics in Statistical Mechanics: The Foundations of Molecular Simulation

From the microscopic to the macroscopic world. Kolloqium April 10, 2014 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Jean BRICMONT

III. Kinetic Theory of Gases

Liouville Equation. q s = H p s

G : Statistical Mechanics Notes for Lecture 3 I. MICROCANONICAL ENSEMBLE: CONDITIONS FOR THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM Consider bringing two systems into

(# = %(& )(* +,(- Closed system, well-defined energy (or e.g. E± E/2): Microcanonical ensemble

ANSWERS TO PROBLEM SET 1

G : Statistical Mechanics

IV. Classical Statistical Mechanics

Statistical Mechanics in a Nutshell

Time-Dependent Statistical Mechanics 5. The classical atomic fluid, classical mechanics, and classical equilibrium statistical mechanics

ChE 503 A. Z. Panagiotopoulos 1

for changing independent variables. Most simply for a function f(x) the Legendre transformation f(x) B(s) takes the form B(s) = xs f(x) with s = df

Statistical Mechanics

9.1 System in contact with a heat reservoir

Under evolution for a small time δt the area A(t) = q p evolves into an area

1 Phase Spaces and the Liouville Equation

Basic Concepts and Tools in Statistical Physics

5. Systems in contact with a thermal bath

Hamilton-Jacobi theory

The Methodology of Statistical Mechanics

= 0. = q i., q i = E

Hamiltonian Dynamics

In-class exercises. Day 1

An Outline of (Classical) Statistical Mechanics and Related Concepts in Machine Learning

Kinetic theory of gases

CHEM-UA 652: Thermodynamics and Kinetics

Quantum Grand Canonical Ensemble

where (E) is the partition function of the uniform ensemble. Recalling that we have (E) = E (E) (E) i = ij x (E) j E = ij ln (E) E = k ij ~ S E = kt i

STATISTICAL PHYSICS II

Symmetries 2 - Rotations in Space

(i) T, p, N Gibbs free energy G (ii) T, p, µ no thermodynamic potential, since T, p, µ are not independent of each other (iii) S, p, N Enthalpy H

Statistical Mechanics

Grand Canonical Formalism

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformations-1

From quantum to classical statistical mechanics. Polyatomic ideal gas.

Electric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism

Sketchy Notes on Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics

Chapter 2 Ensemble Theory in Statistical Physics: Free Energy Potential

Statistical Mechanics

The kinetic equation (Lecture 11)

MD Thermodynamics. Lecture 12 3/26/18. Harvard SEAS AP 275 Atomistic Modeling of Materials Boris Kozinsky

Thermodynamics of the nucleus

Introduction Statistical Thermodynamics. Monday, January 6, 14

Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam

Statistical thermodynamics for MD and MC simulations

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Statistical Physics I Spring Term 2013 Notes on the Microcanonical Ensemble

Information Theory and Predictability Lecture 6: Maximum Entropy Techniques

5. Systems in contact with a thermal bath

Statistical physics and light-front quantization. JR and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D70, (2004) and hep-th/

A Brief Introduction to Statistical Mechanics

Microcanonical Ensemble

Computing the Universe, Dynamics IV: Liouville, Boltzmann, Jeans [DRAFT]

G : Statistical Mechanics

Thermodynamics & Statistical Mechanics

The goal of equilibrium statistical mechanics is to calculate the diagonal elements of ˆρ eq so we can evaluate average observables < A >= Tr{Â ˆρ eq

The Principle of Least Action

Entropy Gradient Maximization for Systems with Discoupled Time

Appendix C extra - Concepts of statistical physics Cextra1-1

Simple Harmonic Oscillator

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES

Derivation of the Boltzmann Distribution

Chapter 9: Statistical Mechanics

We start with some important background material in classical and quantum mechanics.

Lecture Models for heavy-ion collisions (Part III): transport models. SS2016: Dynamical models for relativistic heavy-ion collisions

STATISTICAL MECHANICS

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 1 Jul 2013

Advanced Topics in Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics

Lecture 3 Dynamics 29

List of Comprehensive Exams Topics

Lecture 6. Four postulates of quantum mechanics. The eigenvalue equation. Momentum and energy operators. Dirac delta function. Expectation values

summary of statistical physics

Physics 607 Final Exam

Introduction to Path Integrals

Einstein s early work on Statistical Mechanics

From Particles to Fields

Basics of Statistical Mechanics

Complex Dynamic Systems: Qualitative vs Quantitative analysis

Energy Barriers and Rates - Transition State Theory for Physicists

Momentum expectation Momentum expectation value value for for infinite square well

Slow dynamics in systems with long-range interactions

[S R (U 0 ɛ 1 ) S R (U 0 ɛ 2 ]. (0.1) k B

Thus, the volume element remains the same as required. With this transformation, the amiltonian becomes = p i m i + U(r 1 ; :::; r N ) = and the canon

Analysis of MD Results Using Statistical Mechanics Methods. Molecular Modeling

2m + U( q i), (IV.26) i=1

OPTI 511R, Spring 2018 Problem Set 1 Prof. R.J. Jones

J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2)

Statistical Mechanics I

Chaos in Hamiltonian systems

The Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Statistical Mechanics

CONTENTS 1. In this course we will cover more foundational topics such as: These topics may be taught as an independent study sometime next year.

Kinetic Theory 1 / Probabilities

Concepts in Materials Science I. StatMech Basics. VBS/MRC Stat Mech Basics 0

Averaging II: Adiabatic Invariance for Integrable Systems (argued via the Averaging Principle)

Transcription:

Classical Statistical Mechanics: Part 1 January 16, 2013 Classical Mechanics 1-Dimensional system with 1 particle of mass m Newton s equations of motion for position x(t) and momentum p(t): ẋ(t) dx p = mẋ dt F (t) = ma(t) a(t) = ẍ(t) F (t) = dv dx ṗ(t) = mẍ(t) = F (t) = dv dx Define an energy function called the Hamiltonian H(x, p) = p2 2m + V (x). Introduce terminology p 2 2m = kinetic energy V (x) = potential energy Newton s laws can then be expressed as: ẋ = p m = H p ṗ = dv dx = H x. 1

These are coupled ordinary differential equations whose solution is uniquely specified by specifying two conditions, such as x 0 = x(0) and p 0 = p(0) at some reference time t 0 = 0. Example:Harmonic Oscillator H = p 2 /2m + mω 2 /2x 2 ẋ = H p = p m ṗ = H x = mω2 x = mẍ Trajectories trace an ellipse whose size depends on total energy H, which is conserved (constant) along trajectory. 3-dimensional system of 1 particle Notation: r = (x, y, z) and p = (p x, p y, p z ). Also, p p = p 2 x + p 2 y + p 2 z. The Hamiltonian is: p p 2m + V (r). The equations of motion are: ṙ = H p = p m ṗ = H r = V r 2 particles in 3-dimensions shorthand for Hamiltonian: H = p 1 p 1 2m 1 + p 2 p 2 2m 2 + V (r 1, r 2 ) Equations of motion are: r x r y = 1 m r z p x p y p z r 1 = H = p 1 p 1 m 1 p 1 = H r 1 r 2 = H = p 2 p 2 m 2 p 2 = H r 2 Introduce generalized notation: r (2) = (r 1, r 2 ) and p (2) = (p 1, p 2 ). p (2) p (2) = p 1 p 1 + p 2 p 2

Equations of motion in this notation: ṙ (2) = H p (2) ṗ (2) = H r (2). N particle system in 3-D Equation of motion in generalized notation: ṙ (N) = H p (N) ṗ (N) = H r (N). A total of 6N equations! At each point in time, the system is specified by 6N coordinates (r (N) (t), p (N) (t)) x (N) (t) called the phase point. The set of all phase points is called phase space. Classical dynamics describes a path through the 6N-Dimensional phase space. Special properties of path through phase space: 1. Certain quantities remain unchanged during the evolution of system. Examples: energy, momentum and angular momentum may be conserved (constant) along the path or trajectory of the system. Path remains on a hyper-surface of constant energy in phase space. 2. Paths never cross in phase space. Each disjoint path, labelled by initial conditions, passes arbitrarily close to any point on the constant energy hypersurface. Amount of time for the trajectory of the system from a given initial point in phase space to pass arbitrarily close to the initial point is called the recurrence time: Absolutely enormous for large, interacting systems. Consider an arbitrary function G of the phase space coordinate x (N), G(r (N), p (N), t) = G(x (N), t).

Taking the time derivative, dg(x (N), t) dt = G(x(N), t) t = G(x(N), t) t + G(x(N), t) ṙ (N) + G(x(N), t) ṗ (N) r (N) p (N) + G(x(N), t) r (N) We can define the Liouville operator L to be: L = H p (N) H r (N) r (N) so that in terms of a general function B LB = B r (N) H p (N) In terms of the Liouville operator, dg(x (N), t) dt = G(x(N), t) t H p G(x(N), t) (N) p (N) B p (N) p (N) H r (N). + LG(x (N), t). H r (N). Functions of the phase space coordinate G that are not explicit functions of time t are conserved by the dynamics if LG = 0. Formal solution of evolution is then In particular, Note that LH = 0. G(x (N), t) = e Lt G(x (N), 0). x (N) (t) = e Lt x (N) (0). Can also define the Poisson bracket operator via {A, B} A r (N) B p (N) A p (N) B r (N). The relationship between the Poisson bracket and Liouville operators is LB = {B, H} Important property: so dg(x (N), t) dt = G(x(N), t) t + {G(x (N), t), H(x (N) )}. e Lt ( A(x (N) )B(x (N) ) ) = ( e Lt A(x (N) ) ) ( e Lt B(x (N) ) ) = A(x (N) (t))b(x (N) (t)).

Statistical Mechanics Will discuss Gibb s formulation of statistical mechanics corrected for quantum behavior. Quantum formulation discussed later. The system consists of N identical point particles - behave classically and have no internal degrees of freedom. Recall properties of dynamics: space. a path or trajectory through phase Path never crosses itself. Path is closed: can define the Poincaré recurrence time. For conservative systems, paths explore an equal energy hypersurface of phase space (lower dimensionality). Same is true for other conserved quantities of the dynamics. Consider some arbitrary dynamical variable G(r (N), p (N) ) = G(x (N) ) (function of phase space coordinates and hence possibly evolving in time). An experimental measurement of quantity corresponds to a time average of some (possibly short) sampling interval τ. G obs (t) = 1 τ τ 0 dσ G ( r (N) (t + σ), p (N) (t + σ) ). τ τ m. where τ m is a microscopic time scale. Hence fluctuations on microscopic time scale a smoothed out. For most systems, evolution of G(t) cannot be solved analytically and so must resort to 1. Numerically solving evolution (computer simulation) 2. Developing a new theoretical framework relating time averages to something that can be calculated. Josiah Willard Gibb s idea: Time average of dynamical variable corresponds to an average over a properly weighted set of points of phase space (called an ensemble). The statistical average is called an ensemble average.

Each point in phase space corresponds to a different configuration of the system. Ensemble average therefore corresponds to a weighted average over different configurations of the system. Define a probability density for phase space (often loosely called the distribution function ) : f(r (N), p (N), t) = distribution function and hence f(r (N), p (N), t)dr (N) dp (N) = prob. of finding a system in ensemble with coordinates between (r (N), r (N) +dr (N) ) and (p (N), p (N) + dp (N) ) at time t. The ensemble average is defined as: G(t) = G(t) dr (N) dp (N) G(r (N), p (N) )f(r (N), p (N), t). microcanonical ensemble: All systems in ensemble have the same total energy. All dynamical trajectories with same energy compose a set of states in microcanonical ensemble. Technically, all conserved quantities should also be the same. What is the connection between the ensemble average and the experimental observation (time average)? Quasi-ergodic theorem: As t, a dynamical trajectory will pass arbitrarily close to each point in the constant-energy (if only conserved quantity) hypersurface of phase space. Another statement: For all initial states except for a set of zero measure, the phase space is connected. Hypersurfaces of phase space covered by trajectory.

Consequence: The length of time that a systme spends in a volume Ω of phase space is proportional to that volume. t 1 t 2 = Ω 1 Ω 2. Follows from properties of the dynamics. As t : G obs (t) = 1 τ τ hence G obs (t) = G(t) = 0 dσ G ( r (N) (t + σ), p (N) (t + σ) ) = 1 Ω G(r (N), p (N) )f(r (N), p (N), t) dr (N) dp (N) G(r (N), p (N) ) if f(r (N), p (N), t) = 1/Ω.. All points on hypersurface have the same weight (equally probable). Ensemble analogy: each point in restricted phase space corresponds to a configuration of the system with the same macroscopic properties. Procedure: We will construct an axiomatic approach to find equilibrium distributions. Alternate method: Asymptotic solution of the Boltzmann equation for distribution functions - describes collisions of pairs from Newton s equations an adds an assumption of statistical behavior. System naturally evolves from an initial state to states with static macroscopic properties corresponding to equilibrium properties - Can model this with simple spin systems like the Kac ring model. Measure of disorder, the statistical entropy, increases as the system evolves: maximized in equilibrium. 1 Ensembles and Observables Consider some arbitrary dynamical variable G(r (N), p (N) ) = G(x (N) ) (function of phase space coordinates and hence possibly evolving in time).

An experimental measurement of quantity corresponds to a time average of some (possibly short) sampling interval τ. G obs (t) = G(t) 1 τ τ 0 dσ G ( r (N) (t + σ), p (N) (t + σ) ). τ τ m. where τ m is a microscopic time scale. Hence fluctuations on microscopic time scale a smoothed out. For most systems, evolution of G(t) cannot be solved analytically and so must resort to 1. Numerically solving evolution (computer simulation) 2. Developing a new theoretical framework relating time averages to something that can be calculated. Ensemble Average: Infinite/long time average of dynamical variable corresponds to an average over a properly weighted set of points of phase space (called an ensemble). The statistical average is called an ensemble average. Each point in phase space corresponds to a different configuration of the system. Ensemble average therefore corresponds to a weighted average over different configurations of the system. Define a probability density for phase space (often loosely called the distribution function ) : f(r (N), p (N), t) = distribution function and hence f(r (N), p (N), t)dr (N) dp (N) = prob. of finding a system in ensemble with coordinates between (r (N), r (N) +dr (N) ) and (p (N), p (N) + dp (N) ) at time t. Note that the distribution function is normalized: dr (N) dp (N) f(r (N), p (N), t) = 1

The ensemble average is defined as: G(t) dr (N) dp (N) G(r (N), p (N) ) f(r (N), p (N), t). microcanonical ensemble: All systems in ensemble have the same total energy. All dynamical trajectories with same energy compose a set of states in microcanonical ensemble. Technically, all conserved quantities should also be the same. What is the connection between the ensemble average and the experimental observation (time average)? Quasi-ergodic hypothesis: As t, a dynamical trajectory will pass arbitrarily close to each point in the constant-energy (if only conserved quantity) hypersurface of phase space (metrically transitive). Another statement: For all initial states except for a set of zero measure, the phase space is connected through the dynamics. Hypersurfaces of phase space covered by trajectory. So in some sense, as τ :, we expect G obs (t) = 1 τ τ 0 dσ G ( r (N) (t + σ), p (N) (t + σ) ) = 1 Ω dr (N) dp (N) G(r (N), p (N) ) where Ω = dr (N) dp (N) = dr (N) dp (N) E<H(x (N) )<E+δE hence G obs (t) = G(t) = G(r (N), p (N) )f(r (N), p (N), t) dr (N) dp (N) if f(r (N), p (N), t) = 1/Ω. All points on hypersurface have the same weight (equally probable).

Ensemble analogy: each point in restricted phase space corresponds to a configuration of the system with the same macroscopic properties. Can utilize an axiomatic approach to find equilibrium distributions: Maximize statistical entropy subject to constraints. Alternate method: Asymptotic solution of the Boltzmann equation for distribution functions - describes collisions of pairs from Newton s equations and adds an assumption of statistical behavior (molecular chaos). System naturally evolves from an initial state to states with static macroscopic properties corresponding to equilibrium properties - Can model this with simple spin systems like the Kac ring model. Measure of disorder, the statistical entropy, increases as the system evolves: maximized in equilibrium (H theorem). Idea: Construct an axiomatic approach based on the idea that the disorder, or entropy, is maximized in equilbrium. According to the quasi-ergodic theorem, the distribution function should be constant on the constant energy hypersurface. Following Boltzmann, we define the statistical entropy where S = k ln W W = number of possible states for system of energy E in the range [E, E + δe] for a system of N particles in a volume V. Energy H(x (N) ) is fixed within allowance δe due to uncertainty principle, δeδt h, where δt is the observation time. We wish to obtain the distribution in which all states on energy hypersurface are equally probable. From the normalization condition this implies f(r (N), p (N) ) = { 1 Ω(E,δE,N,V ) for E < H(x (N) ) < E + δe 0 otherwise

Ω is the effective volume of the phase space region: Ω(E, δe, N, V ) = dr (N) dp (N) = = E<H(x (N) )<E+δE E+δE E E+δE Ñ(E ) is called the density of states. E Ñ(E ) { }}{ de dr (N) dp (N) δ(h(r (N), p (N) ) E ) de Ñ(E ) = number of states in energy shell. In the limit of small δe, Ñ(E)δE Ω(E, δe, N, V ). Let W (E, δe, N, V ) be the number of possible quantum states for the set {E, δe, N, V } for N indistinguishable particles. For quantum systems, the statistical entropy is S = k ln(w (E, δe, N, V )). W (E, δe, N, V ) = = Ω(E, δe, N, V ). E<E l <E+δE What about classical systems? What is the relation between number of unique states and the volume Ω of phase space? Considerations: 1. Uncertainty principle: Since δp x δr x h, one cannot differentiate between phase points with (r x, p x ) and (r x, p x) if r x r x < δr x and p x p x < δp x. Limited resolution of phase space: must coarse grain Classically, systems are different: must correct for this overcounting factor. dp x dr x 1 h dp xdr x dr (N) dp (N) 1 h 3N dr(n) dp (N)

2. Quantum statistics In QM, state of N-particle system given by ψ(r 1,..., r n ). Consider a 2-particle classical system with phase space coordinates: Particle 1: (r, p) Particle 1: (r, p ) Particle 2: (r, p ) Particle 2: (r, p) These states are different classically and identical in QM (wavefunction obeys Bose, Fermi-Dirac,... statistics). Permuting labels of N particle system gives different classical and identical QM system. For correspondance, must divide number of classical states by N!. So classically, W (E, δe, N, V ) = 1 dx (N) = 1 Ω(E, δe, N, V ). h 3N N! E<H(x (N) )<E+δE h 3N N! Since f(x (N) ) = 1/Ω ( ) Ω(E, δe, N, V ) S = k ln(w ) = k ln h 3N N! = k ln ( h 3N N!f(x (N) ) ) = k dx (N) f(x (N) ) ln ( h 3N N!f(x (N) ) ). Provides general definition of statistical entropy as an average over the distribution.