Modeling the release of radionuclides from irradiated LBE & Radionuclides in MEGAPIE Alexander Aerts & Jörg Neuhausen

Similar documents
Development of a xenon mitigation prototype

2.1. Investigation of volatile radio-elements produced in LBE

Gamma-irradiation facilities at SCK CEN. A.Gusarov BEX Unit, SCK CEN

Polonium Behavior in eutectic Lead Bismuth Alloy

MYRRHA. International Symposium on Present Status and Future Perspective for Reducing Radioactive waste Tokyo, Japan October 9-10,2014

Developments in a Coupled Thermal- Hydraulic-Chemical-Geomechanical Model for Soil and Concrete

Decontamination and follow up of contaminated persons in Class I companies

School on Physics, Technology and Applications of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) November 2007

SOME ASPECTS OF COOLANT CHEMISTRY SAFETY REGULATIONS AT RUSSIA S NPP WITH FAST REACTORS

The MEGAPIE PIE sample preparation

GASEOUS AND VOLATILE FISSION PRODUCT RELEASE FROM MOLTEN SALT NUCLEAR FUEL

The new BR2 Reactor Perspectives for Radioisotope Production

FIRST-Nuclides: Outcome, Open Questions and Steps Forward

Estimation of accidental environmental release based on containment measurements

4.1 Atomic structure and the periodic table. GCSE Chemistry

Radiochemical determination of 129 Iand 36 Cl in MEGAPIE, a proton irradiated lead-bismuth eutectic spallation target

MEDICAL RADIOISOTOPE PRODUCTION IN RESEARCH REACTORS

Planning and preparation approaches for non-nuclear waste disposal

Basic aspects of radiation protection for radiological incidents

AP1000 European 11. Radioactive Waste Management Design Control Document

8. Relax and do well.

Vacuum gas dynamics investigation and experimental results on the TRASCO-ADS Windowless Interface

If anything confuses you or is not clear, raise your hand and ask!

The Periodic Table of the Elements

11. Radioactive Waste Management AP1000 Design Control Document

Reduction of Radioactive Waste by Accelerators

Chem Exam 1. September 26, Dr. Susan E. Bates. Name 9:00 OR 10:00

CHEM 107 (Spring-2005) Exam 3 (100 pts)

Marks for each question are as indicated in [] brackets.

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies May Transmutation Systems

Science 10. Unit 4:Physics. Block: Name: Book 3: radioactivty

History of the Periodic Table

Chemistry 2 Exam Roane State Academic Festival. Name (print neatly) School

Evaluation of Radiation Characteristics of Spent RBMK-1500 Nuclear Fuel Storage Casks during Very Long Term Storage

Investigation of Polonium Removal Systems for LBE-Cooled Fast Reactors

D) g. 2. In which pair do the particles have approximately the same mass?

INSTRUCTIONS: CHEM Exam I. September 13, 1994 Lab Section

CHEM 167 FINAL EXAM MONDAY, MAY 2 9:45 11:45 A.M GILMAN HALL

Transmutacja Jądrowa w Reaktorach Prędkich i Systemach Podkrytycznych Sterowanych Akceleratorami

An Accelerator Driven System MYRRHA

Chemistry 31A Autumn 2004 Professors Chidsey & Zare Exam 4 Name: 9:00am 10:00am 2:15pm 3:15pm 7:00pm 8:00pm S02 OC103 Charles

Radioactivity Review (Chapter 7)

Half Yearly Exam 2015


Nuclear Spectroscopy: Radioactivity and Half Life

CLASS TEST GRADE 11. PHYSICAL SCIENCES: CHEMISTRY Test 4: Matter and materials 1

Slide 1 / Put the following elements in order of increasing atomic size: P, Cs, Sn, F, Sr, Tl

PRODUCTION OF RADIOISOTOPES FOR IMAGING AND THERAPY AT LOW ENERGY

8. Relax and do well.

Radioactivity is the spontaneous disintegration of nuclei. The first radioactive. elements discovered were the heavy atoms thorium and uranium.

INSTRUCTIONS: Exam III. November 10, 1999 Lab Section

Thorium-Cycle Fission for Green Nuclear Power. Pt Peter McIntyre MIt Texas A&M University

8. Relax and do well.

8. Relax and do well.

8. Relax and do well.

Power Installations based on Activated Nuclear Reactions of Fission and Synthesis

SOURCES of RADIOACTIVITY

CHEM 172 EXAMINATION 1. January 15, 2009

Advanced Placement. Chemistry. Integrated Rates

DURATION: 2 HOUR 45 MINUTES

Using the Periodic Table

PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS

Fission product behaviour in the containment

8. Relax and do well.

FINAL EXAM April 26, 2004

Mark Scheme (Results) November 2010

Laser Spectroscopy on Bunched Radioactive Ion Beams

Electrons. Unit H Chapter 6

ACCUMULATION OF ACTIVATION PRODUCTS IN PB-BI, TANTALUM, AND TUNGSTEN TARGETS OF ADS

College Physics B - PHY2054C

Last 4 Digits of USC ID:

The MYRRHA ADS project

[2] State in what form the energy is released in such a reaction.... [1]

Oregon State University, Summer 2009 Chemistry 121 Final Exam, July 10 th, 10 am

Activity # 2. Name. Date due. Assignment on Atomic Structure

7. Relax and do well.

8. Relax and do well.

DO NOW: Retrieve your projects. We will be reviewing them again today. Textbook pg 23, answer questions 1-3. Use the section 1.2 to help you.

Science 10 Radioactivity Review v3

Stoichiometry. Mole Concept. Balancing Chemical Equations

Status of J-PARC Transmutation Experimental Facility

Thermophysical properties of

M11/4/CHEMI/SPM/ENG/TZ2/XX CHEMISTRY STANDARD LEVEL PAPER 1. Monday 9 May 2011 (afternoon) 45 minutes INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

Chapter 3: Stoichiometry

POLYTECHNIC OF NAMIBIA

Reporting Category 1: Matter and Energy

Proton induced spallation reaction and high power target station

Chem 401 Unit 2 Exam Spr 2018 (Acids/ Bases/ General Equilibria /Acid-Base Equilibria)

Thorium-Cycle Fission for Green Nuclear Power. Pt Peter McIntyre MIt Texas A&M University

Radiation Damage Effects in Solids. Los Alamos National Laboratory. Materials Science & Technology Division

Radiochemistry in reactor

The European Activation File: EAF-2005 decay data library

PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME IN BLOCK LETTERS. Practice Exam 3. Last 4 Digits of USC ID:

CHEM 171 EXAMINATION 1. October 9, Dr. Kimberly M. Broekemeier. NAME: Key

1. This question is about the Rutherford model of the atom.

Lab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.

Chemistry Final Exam Sample Items

Nucleus. Electron Cloud

Solutions and Ions. Pure Substances

Chem GENERAL CHEMISTRY I MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Transcription:

Modeling the release of radionuclides from irradiated LBE & Radionuclides in MEGAPIE Alexander Aerts & Jörg Neuhausen 1st IAEA workshop on challenges for coolants in fast spectrum neutron systems IAEA, Vienna, July 5 th, 2017

Radionuclides in ADS design licensing * ADS system radionuclide inventory particle physics codes chemistry codes radionuclide behavior experimental analysis safety codes safety analysis 2

Radionuclides in ADS design licensing * ADS system radionuclide inventory particle physics codes chemistry codes radionuclide behavior experimental analysis safety codes safety analysis 3

MYRRHA ADS important chemical processes LBE cooled 100 MW accelerator driven system under development 6000 ton LBE 2.4 MW p + beam 4

Radionuclides in ADS design licensing * ADS system radionuclide inventory particle physics codes chemistry codes radionuclide behavior experimental analysis safety codes safety analysis 5

radionuclide inventory of MYRRHA Spallation and coolant activation products in LBE at end of life (40 EFPY) +fuel pin leak -> mobile fission products released into LBE: I, Cs, Te, Mo, Pd, Ba, others? 6

potential dose impact by inhalation no retention in LBE assumed MYRRHA: 30 elements with potential dose > 5 msv (SO2, 1/10 3 lifetimes < f < 1/lifetime) Retention needs to be assessed for normal operation and accidents (water!) 7

Radionuclides in ADS design licensing * ADS system radionuclide c inventory particle physics codes chemistry codes radionuclide behavior experimental analysis safety codes safety analysis 8

Radionuclide behavior: retention by LBE Retention = not evaporating important phenomena that control retention of a radionuclide G/S adsorption precipitation dissolution gas phase reactions evaporation condensation Thermodynamic (equilibrium) description requires: Free energies of formation of solids Partial free dissolution energies of dissolved elements Free energies of formation of gas molecules Free energies of adsorption L/S adsorption deposition 9

Recommended vapour pressure correlations OECD-NEA HLM handbook (2015) 10

Limitations Limited set of data, for small number of elements (>< ADS inventory) Interactions between different elements/phases not fully accounted for Not possible to assess for example influence of oxygen control: interactions of impurity with dissolved oxygen, Reactions with water vapour after accidental water ingress Does not exploit maximally the large knowledge basis of scientific literature => Limited use for safety assessments (licensing) complex installations (ADS, HLM FR) 11

Global approach to predict radionuclide release/chemistry in LBE MYrrha THermochemical model: MYTH thermochemical data ~1350 chemical species: Pb, Bi, oxygen, cover gas, corrosion products, initial impurities, RN, gas, condensed species - databases: HSC, FactSage, Barin, NIST, - other scientific literature dissolved species - Literature: analysis Pb-X, Bi-X phase diagrams, CALPHAD, - Po, I, Hg, Cd, Te, Se: evaporation data - O: EMF data polonium molecules - quantum chemistry - extrapolation MYRRHA conditions - n, p, T, V (x,t) - O control - cover gas impurities (O 2,H 2 O) Impurity inventory - neutronics: radionuclides - chemical analysis: stable impurities Experimental results Chemical composition - Evaporation, precipitation/dissolution - speciation MYRRHA safety analysis Source: 12

examples (1) Magnetite formation - Se, Te evaporation Some thermochemical properties needed to be estimated Model predictions agree well with experimental results Precipitation/dissolution phenomena Magnetite formation in LBE: Reaction between dissolved oxygen and dissolved iron Se Evaporation phenomena tellurium molecules in the cover gas (MYTH) Te More validation needed for model predictions 13

MYTH examples (2) Po evaporation OECD recommended Henry constant correlation vs experimental data 14

Examples (2) Po evaporation OECD recommended Henry constant correlation vs experimental data Ok above 500 C Predicted release vs time at 400 C Analysis experimental data + quantum chemical calculations gas molecules => thermochemical model of MYRRHA: PbPo(g) and Po(g) dominant in the cover gas Gonzalez et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 2014, 450(1-3), 299-303. Gonzalez et al., Radiochim. Acta 2014, 102(12), 1083-1091. 15

Examples (2) Po evaporation Evaporation below 500 C in inert & reducing atmosphere Observed release vs time at 400 C in Ar long term release x 50 Transient release from surface oxide layer Gonzalez et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem 2014, 302(1), 195 200. Gonzalez et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem 2016, 309(2), 597 605. 16

Examples (2) Po evaporation Evaporation below 500 C in presence of water vapor Observed release vs time at 400 C in Ar/10%H 2 O % H 2 O x 2500 Surface oxide layer mediated release with increased volatilization due to water? PoO 2. H 2 O(g) dominant in the cover gas? Crucial effect, but lack of data to quantify Gonzalez et al., unpublished results, 2017. 17

Examples (2) Po evaporation MYTH simulation with tellurium provides insight in polonium behavior Tellurium evaporation from (Pb,Bi)oxide layer in presence of water vapour Increased volatilization at low temperatures and formation of OH molecules To do this for Po: thermochemical properties Po molecules needed, experimental investigation mechanism + modeling 18

Examples (3) Iodine evaporation from LBE Experimental results at low temperature >> OECD correlations iodine molecules in the cover gas (MYTH) Insufficient data in literature available for estimation thermochemical properties of dissolved iodine iodine apparent Henry constant Current approach: model fitted to experimental results Validation needed (independent measurement techniques) 19

Examples (4) Model prediction: enhanced iodine-cesium evaporation Fuel pin rupture: Cs and I released into LBE simultaneously Complete release into cover gas as CsI(g) predicted >>> OECD recommended correlation Kinetic effects? Experimental validation needed 20

RN retention by LBE in MYRRHA from MYTH model radiological impact Spallation & activation source term only (no FP released) No effects of oxide layer included! 21

PART 2 Radionuclides in MEGAPIE 22

The MEGAPIE experiment ADS system A key experiment on the ADS roadmap * flowing LBE + 575 MeV protons radionuclide inventory Operated for 123 days at PSI in 2006 MW power design licensing T max =350 C radionuclide behavior particle physics codes chemistry codes experimental analysis Following slides: courtesy of Jörg Neuhausen (PSI) safety analysis safety codes 23

Sampling cover gas monitoring - sampling - pressure measurement post-irradiation LBE sampling - LBE bulk - LBE-steel interface - LBE-cover gas interface Major effort! 24

Cover gas monitoring Pressure increase during operation by hydrogen and helium consistent with nuclear code predictions MYTH predictions suggest release as H 2 (g) or H 2 O(g) Xe, Kr are released, reasonable agreement with nuclear code predictions Little released mercury detected but quantification difficult Traces of polonium < astatine 25

Post-irradiation LBE analysis gamma spectra before separation steel interface cover gas interface bulk 26

Post-irradiation LBE analysis: lanthanides 173 Lu, 148 Gd, 146 Pm 173 Lu estimated total activity [GBq] bulk 22 6 LBE/steel interface predicted activity [GBq] % of predicted amount 7 ± 2 321 181 58 57 ± 18 Sum 203 ± 64 64 ± 20 inhomogeneous -> interface : bulk ratio = 9 : 1 Resonable agreement with calculated inventory (64%) MYTH predictions in agreement: Ln oxide formation 27

Post-irradiation LBE analysis: iodine 129 I ( 36 Cl) 129 I estimated total activity [Bq] predicted activity [Bq] % of predicted amount bulk 295 18 3.4 ± 0.2 8560 LBE/steel interface (37 ± 20) 10 2 43 ± 23 LBE cover gas interface 1.2 0.1 (14 1) x 10-3 Absorber (38 2) x 10-2 (44 2) x 10-4 Sum 3997 ± 2018 47 ± 23 Inhomogeneous: incorporation into surface layer Reasonable agreement with calculated inventory (factor 2) Difficult to assess likely chemical state 28

Post-irradiation LBE analysis: polonium 208 Po, 209 Po, 210 Po 208 Po (Bq/g) 209 Po (Bq/g) 210 Po (Bq/g) chem. anal. 1.63 ± 0.14 10 6 1.04 ± 0.08 10 4 5.04 ± 0.39 10 7 FLUKA 3.28 10 6 1.63 10 4 1.61 10 8 MCNPX 1.42 10 6 2.68 10 4 1.53 10 8 Homogeneous no enrichment Resonable agreement with calculated inventory MYTH predictions in agreement 29

Conclusions In safety assessments for licensing of LBE/Pb cooled ADS and FR, accurate prediction of retention of radionuclides by LBE/Pb is crucial Recommended data in OECD handbook allow limited assessments only SCK-CENs approach (MYTH model) allows global equilibrium analysis and has been very successful in several cases But for a number critical radionuclides (e.g. polonium, iodine) the availability of fundamental data and understanding of mechanisms is still insufficient for quantitative predictions Thermochemical (equilibrium) model needs coupling to system/cfd code Dedicated collaborative R&D programmes should be set up to fill the gaps Chemical analyses of the integral MEGAPIE experiment remain the most important experience feedback to qualitatively check model predictions 30

Acknowledgements: The authors thank the Belgian Government for supporting the MYRRHA project. This project has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 under grant agreement No 662186 (MYRTE).?

Copyright 2017 - SCK CEN PLEASE NOTE! This presentation contains data, information and formats for dedicated use ONLY and may not be copied, distributed or cited without the explicit permission of the SCK CEN. If this has been obtained, please reference it as a personal communication. By courtesy of SCK CEN. SCK CEN Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie Centre d'etude de l'energie Nucléaire Belgian Nuclear Research Centre Stichting van Openbaar Nut Fondation d'utilité Publique Foundation of Public Utility Registered Office: Avenue Herrmann-Debrouxlaan 40 BE-1160 BRUSSELS Operational Office: Boeretang 200 BE-2400 MOL 32

Pb, Bi and O solution properties HLM handbook OECD 2015 33

Solubility data in OECD HLM handbook (2015) 34

Limitations Limited set of data, for small number of elements (>< ADS inventory) 35

Limitations Does not exploit maximally the large knowledge basis of scientific literature Thermodynamic properties of dissolution 36

Limitations Does not exploit maximally the large knowledge basis of scientific literature Thermodynamic properties of dissolution 37

Lutetium in MYTH model Lu oxidized and phase separated under normal operating conditions (oxygen controlled LBE) 38

What does MYRRHA thermochemical model say about hydrogen? Hydrogen will be converted to water vapor at equilibrium in oxygen controlled LBE: H 2 (g) + O(lbe) = H 2 O(g) But: reaction slow below 400 C -> release as H 2 (g) (MEGAPIE < 350 C) Minor fraction of H could be incorporated in solid spallation product hydroxides. 39