Topological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons

Similar documents
Coordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates

HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY

Introduction to the Idea of Twisted SUSY Nonlinear Sigma Model

arxiv:hep-th/ v3 4 May 2004

The Phase Diagram of the BMN Matrix Model

Generalized N = 1 orientifold compactifications

ELEVEN DIMENSIONS FROM THE MASSIVE D-2-BRANE

The Self-Dual String Soliton ABSTRACT

Instanton effective action in - background and D3/D(-1)-brane system in R-R background

A Landscape of Field Theories

String Theory and Noncommutative Geometry

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 28 Jan 1999

Tachyon Condensation in String Theory and Field Theory

N=1 Global Supersymmetry in D=4

Techniques for exact calculations in 4D SUSY gauge theories

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification by Heterotic Five-branes

Supercurrents. Nathan Seiberg IAS

Exact solutions in supergravity

An action for the super-5-brane in D=11 supergravity

Ω-deformation and quantization

Topological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality

Higher-Spin Fermionic Gauge Fields & Their Electromagnetic Coupling

Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes

Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 Aug 2000

Heterotic Geometry and Fluxes

Supersymmetric Skyrme Model. Muneto Nitta (Keio U.,Jp)

Graded Lie Algebra of Quaternions and Superalgebra of SO(3, 1)

Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION. Special Geometry. Yang Zhang. Abstract: N = 2 Supergravity. based on hep-th/ , Boris PiolineA

On Special Geometry of Generalized G Structures and Flux Compactifications. Hu Sen, USTC. Hangzhou-Zhengzhou, 2007

Twistor Strings, Gauge Theory and Gravity. Abou Zeid, Hull and Mason hep-th/

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 22 Jan 2000

First Year Seminar. Dario Rosa Milano, Thursday, September 27th, 2012

BPS D-branes after Tachyon Condensation

Exact Results in D=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories And Applications

NONINTEGER FLUXES, DOLBEAULT COMPLEXES, AND SUPERSYMMETRIC QUANTUM MECHANICS. based on [ ] and [ ] Hannover, August 1, 2011

Nonspherical Giant Gravitons and Matrix Theory

GRANGIAN QUANTIZATION OF THE HETEROTIC STRING IN THE BOSONIC FORMULAT

An overview of branes in the plane wave background

Dynamics of Multiple Kaluza-Klein Monopoles in M- and String Theory

A SUPERMEMBRANE DESCRIPTION OF STRING-STRING DUALITY. Fermin ALDABE 1

Star operation in Quantum Mechanics. Abstract

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 11 Sep 2008

Maximally Supersymmetric Solutions in Supergravity

BFT embedding of noncommutative D-brane system. Abstract

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

Noncommutativity in String Theory

2d N = (2, 2) supersymmetry with U(1) RV in curved space

Rigid SUSY in Curved Superspace

Chiral matter wavefunctions in warped compactifications

Snyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 25 Aug 2017

LAGRANGIANS FOR CHIRAL BOSONS AND THE HETEROTIC STRING. J. M. F. LABASTIDA and M. PERNICI The Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ 08540, USA

Instantons in supersymmetric gauge theories. Tobias Hansen Talk at tuesday s Werkstatt Seminar January 10, 2012

Counting black hole microstates as open string flux vacua

Kähler representations for twisted supergravity. Laurent Baulieu LPTHE. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Puri, January 6th, 2011

Berry Phase and Supersymmetry

N = 2 supergravity in d = 4, 5, 6 and its matter couplings

MIFPA PiTP Lectures. Katrin Becker 1. Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. 1

Symmetries of curved superspace

Week 11 Reading material from the books

Tools for supersymmetry

Generalized complex geometry and supersymmetric non-linear sigma models

Membrane Matrix models. Workshop on Noncommutative Field Theory and Gravity

Small Black Strings/Holes

The Dirac Propagator From Pseudoclassical Mechanics

Elements of Topological M-Theory

Quantum Nambu Geometry in String Theory

SUPERSTRING REALIZATIONS OF SUPERGRAVITY IN TEN AND LOWER DIMENSIONS. John H. Schwarz. Dedicated to the memory of Joël Scherk

GSO projection and target space supersymmetry

TOPOLOGICAL REDUCTION OF 4D SYM TO 2D σ MODELS

SU(2) WZW D-branes and quantized worldvolume U(1) flux on S 2

The Super D9-Brane and its Truncations

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Supersymmetric CP N Sigma Model on Noncommutative Superspace

Some Useful Formalism for Supersymmetry

Non-Abelian tensor multiplet in four dimensions

752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 29 Mar 1997

EQUIVALENCE OF DUAL FIELD THEORETICAL LIMITS OF SUPERSTRING THEORIES. J. M. F. Labastida *

Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, Matrix Models and Geometric Transitions

Introduction Calculation in Gauge Theory Calculation in String Theory Another Saddle Point Summary and Future Works

Spacetime Quantum Geometry

Citation for published version (APA): Halbersma, R. S. (2002). Geometry of strings and branes. Groningen: s.n.

1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 2 Dec 1995

V = 1 2 (g ijχ i h j ) (2.4)

Institut fur Theoretische Physik Universitat Hannover Institut fur Theoretische Physik Universitat Hannover Institut fur Theoretische Physik Hannover

arxiv: v4 [hep-th] 30 May 2008

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

A note on the principle of least action and Dirac matrices

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 20 Nov 2018

Smooth Wilson Loops and Yangian Symmetry in Planar N = 4 SYM

A Short Note on D=3 N=1 Supergravity

Topics in Topological and Holomorphic Quantum Field Theory

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 14 Oct 1997

Deformations of calibrated D-branes in flux generalized complex manifolds

Brane-Waves and Strings

Transcription:

8 November 00 Physics Letters B 50 00) 70 7 www.elsevier.com/locate/npe Topological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons A. Imaanpur Department of Physics, School of Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 55-838, Tehran, Iran and Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, P.O. Box 9395-553, Tehran, Iran Received 8 May 00; received in revised form August 00; accepted August 00 Editor: L. Alvarez-Gaumé Abstract We consider Euclidean D and D6-branes filling the whole R and R 6 space, respectively. In both cases, with a constant background B-field turned on for D-branes, we propose actions which are the same as the DBI actions up to some constant or total derivative terms. These extra terms allow us to write the action as a square of nonlinear instanton equations. As such, the actions can easily be supersymmetrized using the methods of topological field theory. 00 Elsevier Science B.V. Open access under CC BY license.. Introduction D-branes in string theory are effectively described by the Dirac Born Infeld action. The action has also a supersymmetric extension which consists of two parts; the Dirac Born Infeld DBI) part, and the Wess Zumino part. Both parts of the action are invariant under the rigid spacetime supersymmetry transformations, however, for a specific choice of normalization of the Wess Zumino term, the whole action turns out to have an extra local symmetry known as κ-symmetry. The κ-symmetry allows one to remove the redundant fermionic degrees of freedom []. Here we are only concerned with the bosonic part of the DBI action. Later on, we will explain on an alternative way to supersymmetrize the action using the methods of topological field theory [,3]. When a constant background B-field is turned on, the only change in the DBI action is to replace F the field strength of the U) gauge field by F + B E-mail address: aimaanpu@theory.ipm.ac.ir A. Imaanpur). everywhere in the action. Using the Seiberg Witten map, one could also recast the action in terms of the open string variables and noncommutative filed strength F []. In this description, the effect of B appears only through the open string metric, coupling constant,and F. Considering a supersymmetric extension of the DBI action in a constant B-field, and looking for BPS states which preserve part of the supersymmetry leads to a deformed instanton equation as the BPS condition. These deformed equations, the socalled nonlinear instanton equations [5], are our main interest in this Letter. We start our discussion with the DBI action in the absence of any background field in four dimensions. By adding to the DBI action some appropriate terms, which are either constant or total derivatives, an action is derived that has instantons as its critical points [7]. The structure of these extra terms is easy to guess if one notes that the action has to vanish at infinity where F 0, and the fact that it is defined up to some topological terms. However, when there is a background B-field, these terms are very nontrivial to guess. In this case we derive the action by requiring, 0370-693/0/ 00 Elsevier Science B.V. Open access under CC BY license. PII: S0370-6930)00990-X

A. Imaanpur / Physics Letters B 50 00) 70 7 7 as in the case of B 0, that it vanish at infinity, and its critical points coincide with the nonlinear instantons [ 6]. Actually the action will turn out to be proportional to the square of nonlinear instanton equations. This will allow us to supersymmetrize the action using the topological filed theory methods. As for the D6-branes in R 6, we look for an action which vanishes at infinity, and has some possible extra topological terms. The proposed action then will have nonlinear instantons as its critical points.. Topological DBI action in a background B-field In this section, we consider first the case of B 0 which has also been discussed in [7]. Next, D-branes in a constant background B-field are examined. In both cases, we propose actions which are the same as the usual DBI actions up to some constant or total derivative terms. The point for choosing such actions is that they can be written as the square of some sections which have zeros on BPS configurations, and can easily be supersymmetrized. We work out the Lagrangian in the case of B 0, and derive a supersymmetric extension which has nonlinear instantons [] as the fixed points of the corresponding fermionic symmetry. Before doing any calculations, let us first express the result for the bosonic part of the Lagrangian explicitly L detg + M) detg + B) Pf B) + Pf F + ) detg + B) ɛij kl B ij F kl B ij + F ij detg + B). ) As can be seen, apart from the second term which is a constant, all extra terms are total derivative. These extra terms are needed if we demand that the Lagrangian vanish on BPS configurations. And we demand this to be able to supersymmetrize the action in a topological way. To begin with, let us get on to the case of B 0. Expanding the determinant appearing in the DBI action, we will have detg + F) + det F + F + PfF PfF Pf F) + F +, ) where F F ij F ij, F ij + F ij + ɛ ij klf kl ),PfF 8 ɛ ij klf ij F kl, and we use the flat metric g ij δ ij everywhere. Rewritting ), we have detg + F)+ Pf F detg + F) + Pf F ) F+. 3) However, in the following, we will show that the term f detg + F)+ Pf F is positive definite. On the other hand, a natural choice for the DBI Lagrangian which vanishes at infinity where F 0), and is different from the usual DBI Lagrangian by a constant and a total derivative is L detg + F) + Pf F. ) By looking at 3), we realize that choosing L as above has also the advantage of being proportional to the square of a section here F + ), and, therefore, can be supersymmetrized using topological field theory methods. This will be explained shortly. Moreover, since f is positive definite, then Eq. 3) implies that L 0 if and only if F + 0. To see that f is positive definite, first note that it can be written as f detg + F)+ Pf F detg + F) { detg ) } + F)+ Pf F + F +. 5) This equation shows that the left-hand side is not negative. However, if it is zero, then F + must vanish, and this implies detg + F)+ Pf F detg + F)+ + F which is always positive and cannot be zero. Thus Eq. 5) tells us that f now call it /h ) is positive definite. As such, using 3), we can write L detg + F) + Pf F h F +. This also proves that L 0 if and only if F + 0. To extend the above results to the case of B 0, we consider the BPS condition for Euclidean D-branes in a background constant B-field. Noticing that F has

7 A. Imaanpur / Physics Letters B 50 00) 70 7 to vanish at infinity, this condition reads [] M ij + Pf M + detg + M) Pf B + detg + B) B+ ij αb+ ij, where M F + B. As in the above case with B 0, in the following, we construct an action which has the same critical points as the above BPS configurations. The result will be L detg + M) detg + B) Pf B) + Pf F + ) detg + B) ɛij kl B ij F kl B ij + F ij detg + B) M + αb + ) 6) α detg + B) N +. Notice that α is positive definite for the same reason that the left-hand side of 5) is positive definite). Therefore, L vanishes if and only if M + αb +,i.e., it localizes on the BPS configurations. To prove 6), first note that M+ ) Pf M + detg + M) B+ Pf B + detg + B) + Pf M + detg + M) + Pf B + detg + B) using Eq. 3). Therefore, we can write ) αβ, 7) M + αb + ) M+ + α B+ αb +ij M ij + αβb+ + α B+ αb + αb +ij F ij + αb+ α + β ) αb +ij F ij +. 8) After a little algebra, the first term in the last equality can be written as αb+ α + β ) α detg + B) detg + M) detg + B) Pf B) + Pf F + detg + B) ɛij kl B ij F kl )). Plugging this into Eq. 8), finally we arrive at 6). Now that L has been written as a square of N +, we employ the topological field theory methods to supersymmetrize it [8]. To do so, we first introduce a ghost one-form field ψ i, the fermionic partner of A i, a scalar field φ, and a BRST-like operator δ with an action δa i iɛψ i, δψ i ɛ i φ, δφ 0, where ɛ is a constant anticommuting parameter. Further we need to introduce the anti-ghost fields; a selfdual -form χ ij the conjugate field to N ij + ), a scalar η, as well as a scalar λ with ghost number. These transform under δ as follows δχ ij ɛh ij, δh ij 0, δλ iɛη, δη 0, here the auxiliary self-dual field H ij has been introduced to close the algebra off shell. Let us define the operator Q by δφ iɛ{q, Φ}, for any field Φ. We would like the Lagrangian to be a BRST commutator, i.e., L S i{q, V }, for some gauge fermion V.Since Q acting on any field is zero up to a gauge transformation, this ensures that L is invariant under the fermionic symmetry Q if V is chosen to be gauge invariant. A minimal choice for V is V χ ij H ij N ij + ) + ψi i λ. We now vary V to get L L S i{q, V } H ij H ij + H ij N + ij iχij δn+ ij δa k ψk + iφ i λ + iψ i i λ. The auxiliary field H ij can be integrated out using its equation of motion. Doing this, we obtain L S N+ δn+ iχij ij δa k ψk + iφ i λ + iψ i i λ detg + M) detg + B) Pf B) + Pf F + ) detg + B) ɛij kl B ij F kl B ij + F ij detg + B) iχ ij δn+ ij δa k ψk + iφ i λ + iψ i i λ. 9)

A. Imaanpur / Physics Letters B 50 00) 70 7 73 3. D6-branes in R 6 The last issue we would like to discuss is the DBI action of flat Euclidean D6-branes in R 6 with B 0. Here one may expect that, as in the case of topological action of D-branes which has Yang Mills instantons as its critical points, the topological action of D6-branes will have the Kähler Yang Mills instantons as its critical points. But, as we will see, this is not the case. Instead, the proposed topological Lagrangian L detg + F) + 0) 6 ɛij klmn k mn F ij F kl, localizes on the solutions of the following equations; Pf F k ij F ij and F,0 0, ) where i,j,...,...,6andk k ij dx i dx j is the Kähler form. These equations are also derived in [5] as the BPS conditions for D6-branes. In the following, we motivate the above definition of the topological action for D6-branes in R 6. To start, we use the following identity on flat Euclidean R 6 [,0] detg + F) ρ 6, with ρ 6 ɛ ij klmn { 6! ɛ ij klmnτ γ 7! τ γ ij kl F mn + i 6 τ γ ij F kl F mn 8 τ F ij F kl F mn ) }, where τ,τ, and τ 3 are the Pauli matrices. Alternatively, since! ɛij klmn γ klmn iγ 7 γ ij, we can write ) as detg + F) γ 7 + i ) 6 ɛij klmn γ mn F ij F kl ) i + 3) F ij γ 7 γ ij + Pf F. The Kähler Yang Mills equations k ij F ij 0, F,0 0, naturally arise in the construction of a cohomological field theory on Calabi Yau 3-folds [9]. There they appear as the fixed points of the corresponding BRST symmetry. Now take θ to be a constant commuting left-handed spinor on R 6. We choose the gamma matrices to be Hermitian and antisymmetric, and in the complex coordinate let γ α θ 0, with the normalization θ θ. The Kähler form and the holomorphic 3-form are then defined as follows [9] k ij iθ γ ij θ, C ij k θ γ ij k θ. ) Expanding Eq. 3), and multiplying it by θ on left and θ on right, and using ) results in the following identity detg + F) 6 ɛij klmn ) k mn F ij F kl + Pf F F ij ) k ij + Fαβ F αβ + F αβ F αβ, 5) where α,β,γ,... are the complex holomorphic tangent indices, F ij ɛij klmn F kl F mn, and use has been made of kij F ij ) 6) 8 ɛij klmn F ij F kl k mn + F F αβ F αβ, for any rank antisymmetric tensor in 6 dimensions. Let us now write 5) as detg + F) + 6 detg + F)+ 6 Pf F F ij ) k ij + Fαβ F αβ + F αβ F αβ. 7) As in the case of D-branes, first we prove that the term f detg + F)+ 6 ɛij klmn k mn F ij F kl on the left-hand side of Eq. 7) is positive definite. To show this, notice that the left-hand side of Eq. 7) can be written as detg + F)+ detg + F) + detg + F)+

7 A. Imaanpur / Physics Letters B 50 00) 70 7 detg + F)+ ) detg + F) detg + F)+ + detg + F) detg + F)+. So, using 7), we can write detg + F) detg + F)+ 6 detg + F)+ 6 ) + Pf F F ij ) k ij + F αβ F αβ + F αβ F αβ. 8) Therefore, f is not negative. But if it is zero, according to the above equation we must have Pf F k ij F ij, F αβ 0, equation F αβ 0 is automatically satisfied when F αβ 0). So Eq. 5) becomes detg + F) 6 ɛij klmn ), k mn F ij F kl 9) we write this as 8 ɛij klmn k mn F ij F kl detg + F)+ + 6 ɛ ij klmn ) k mn F ij F kl det F F F ij 8 F ij + + 8 ɛ ij klmn k 8 mn F ij F kl + 8 F ij ) F ij, where in the last line we have expanded the determinant, and used 6) with F αβ 0. Finally the above equation implies that ) 8 ɛ ij klmn k 8 mn F ij F kl detf F < 0. Hence h f detg + F)+ 6 ɛij klmn k mn F ij F kl cannot vanish and is positive definite. The above calculations show that a good choice for the DBI Lagrangian of D6-branes in R 6 is the one in 0). This is justified for the following reasons. Firstly, it vanishes at infinity where F 0, and up to a constant and a total derivative is the usual DBI Lagrangian. Secondly, Eq. 7) and the positive definiteness of f allow us to write 0) as L detg + F) + 6 ɛij klmn k mn F ij F kl h { Pf F F ij ) k ij + Fαβ F αβ + F αβ F } αβ 0) which shows that L is zero if and only if Pf F k ij F ij,f αβ 0. Since the right-hand side of 0) is the sum of the squares of the sections s ) h Pf F F ij ) k ij, s ) αβ hf αβ, s 3) αβ h F αβ, we can employ the same method that we used in the previous section to supersymmetrize the action. For the case of Kähler Yang Mills equations, this has been explicitly done in [9]. References [] P.K. Townsend, Three lectures on supermembranes, in: M. Green, M. Grisaru, R. Iengo, E. Sezgin, A. Strominger Eds.), Superstrings 88, World Scientific, 989. [] A. Imaanpur, JHEP 9909 999) 00, hep-th/99063. [3] A. Imaanpur, Phys. Lett. B 9 000) 365 368, hepth/000809. [] N. Seiberg, E. Witten, JHEP 9909 999) 03, hepth/9908. [5] M. Marino, R. Minasian, G. Moore, A. Strominger, JHEP 000 000) 005, hep-th/9906. [6] S. Terashima, Phys. Lett. B 77 000) 9 98, hepth/995. [7] B. Spence, hep-th/9907053. [8] E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 7 988) 353. [9] J.M. Figueroa-O Farrill, A. Imaanpur, J. McCarthy, Phys. Lett. B 9 998) 67, hep-th/970978. [0] M. Aganagic, C. Popescu, J.H. Schwarz, Nucl. Phys. B 95 997) 99 6, hep-th/96080.