Cluster structure of quantum Coxeter Toda system

Similar documents
Cluster structure of quantum Coxeter Toda system

Towards a modular functor from quantum higher Teichmüller theory

Difference Painlevé equations from 5D gauge theories

SEEDS AND WEIGHTED QUIVERS. 1. Seeds

(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)

Quantizations of cluster algebras

The geometry of cluster algebras

THE QUANTUM CONNECTION

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Moduli spaces of sheaves and the boson-fermion correspondence

Schedule of the Lectures

NOTES ON QUANTUM TEICHMÜLLER THEORY. 1. Introduction

Definition 9.1. The scheme µ 1 (O)/G is called the Hamiltonian reduction of M with respect to G along O. We will denote by R(M, G, O).

2-FRIEZE PATTERNS AND THE CLUSTER STRUCTURE OF THE SPACE OF POLYGONS

Q(x n+1,..., x m ) in n independent variables

integrable systems in the dimer model R. Kenyon (Brown) A. Goncharov (Yale)

Quantum cluster algebras from geometry

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Twists for positroid cells

The Geometry of Cluster Varieties arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 26 Dec from Surfaces

What elliptic cohomology might have to do with other generalized Schubert calculi

RAQ2014 ) TEL Fax

ANNALES SCIENTIFIQUES L ÉCOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE. Cluster ensembles, quantization and the dilogarithm. Vladimir V. FOCK & Alexander B.

Cluster structures on open Richardson varieties and their quantizations

Problem 1. Let f n (x, y), n Z, be the sequence of rational functions in two variables x and y given by the initial conditions.

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Contents. Preface for the Instructor. Preface for the Student. xvii. Acknowledgments. 1 Vector Spaces 1 1.A R n and C n 2

Math 249B. Tits systems

Anton M. Zeitlin. Columbia University, Department of Mathematics. Super-Teichmüller theory. Anton Zeitlin. Outline. Introduction. Cast of characters

From Bernstein approximation to Zauner s conjecture

Integrable cluster dynamics of directed networks and pentagram maps

Riemann-Hilbert problems from Donaldson-Thomas theory

Twists for positroid cells

R-matrices, affine quantum groups and applications

Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians: The Heisenberg group and the Schrödinger Representation

W -Constraints for Simple Singularities

Langlands duality from modular duality

Combinatorics of Theta Bases of Cluster Algebras

FROM CLASSICAL THETA FUNCTIONS TO TOPOLOGICAL QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

Introduction to cluster algebras. Andrei Zelevinsky (Northeastern University) MSRI/Evans Lecture, UC Berkeley, October 1, 2012

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

RESEARCH PROPOSAL FOR P. DELIGNE CONTEST

4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

GRAPH QUANTUM MECHANICS

CLUSTER AUTOMORPHISMS AND HYPERBOLIC CLUSTER ALGEBRAS IBRAHIM A SALEH

1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator

Endoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group

Lecture 3: Tropicalizations of Cluster Algebras Examples David Speyer

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation

Whittaker functions and Harmonic analysis

Tropicalizations of Positive Parts of Cluster Algebras The conjectures of Fock and Goncharov David Speyer

arxiv:math/ v4 [math.ag] 29 Apr 2006

Specialized Macdonald polynomials, quantum K-theory, and Kirillov-Reshetikhin crystals

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

Random matrix pencils and level crossings

Path Integral for Spin

Supersymmetric gauge theory, representation schemes and random matrices

Crossed products of irrational rotation algebras by finite subgroups of SL 2 (Z) are AF

Affine Gaudin models

Twisted Higher Rank Graph C*-algebras

Notes on Green functions

Research Statement. Edward Richmond. October 13, 2012

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Conference on Infinite Dimensional Lie Theory and its Applications (15-20 December, 2014) Title & Abstract

2. Introduction to quantum mechanics

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 4 Jun 2016

Combinatorics and geometry of E 7

RESEARCH STATEMENT NEAL LIVESAY

Lie Groups and Algebraic Groups

The Based Loop Group of SU(2) Lisa Jeffrey. Department of Mathematics University of Toronto. Joint work with Megumi Harada and Paul Selick

Inequivalent bundle representations for the Noncommutative Torus

The Spinor Representation

Hadamard matrices and Compact Quantum Groups

CLUSTER ALGEBRA ALFREDO NÁJERA CHÁVEZ

Algebraic Theory of Entanglement

-state problems and an application to the free particle

Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition

arxiv:solv-int/ v1 31 May 1993

The semantics of algebraic quantum mechanics and the role of model theory.

Spectral networks at marginal stability, BPS quivers, and a new construction of wall-crossing invariants

Quadratic differentials as stability conditions. Tom Bridgeland (joint work with Ivan Smith)

Singularities, Root Systems, and W-Algebras

The quantum state as a vector

Edinburgh, December 2009

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.qa] 12 Jun 2004

On level crossing in deterministic and random matrix pencils

(Affine) generalized associahedra, root systems, and cluster algebras

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures

Zeta functions of buildings and Shimura varieties

Arithmetic quantum chaos and random wave conjecture. 9th Mathematical Physics Meeting. Goran Djankovi

arxiv:math/ v7 [math.ag] 4 Aug 2009

Exact Results in D=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories And Applications

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

Parabolic subgroups Montreal-Toronto 2018

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2)

The following definition is fundamental.

Transcription:

Cluster structure of the quantum Coxeter Toda system Columbia University June 5, 2018 Slides available at www.math.columbia.edu/ schrader

I will talk about some joint work (arxiv: 1806.00747) with Alexander Shapiro on an application of cluster algebras to quantum integrable systems.

Setup for higher Teichmüller theory S = a marked surface G = PGL n (C) X G,S := moduli of framed G local systems on S

Modular functor conjecture As Sasha explained, Fock and Goncharov constructed an assignment S {algebra X q G,S, Hilbert space representation V of X q G,S, unitary rep of MCG(S) on V}. Conjecture: (Fock Goncharov 09) This assignment is local with respect to gluing of surfaces.

Modular functor conjecture i.e. if S = S 1 γ S 2, there should be a mapping class group equivariant isomorphism V [S] ν V ν [S 1 ] V ν [S 2 ] ν = eigenvalues of monodromy around loop γ

Relation with quantum Toda system So we need to understand the spectral theory of the operators Ĥ 1,..., Ĥ n quantizing the functions on X G,S sending a local system to its eigenvalues around γ. If we can find a complete set of eigenfunctions for Ĥ 1,..., Ĥ n that are simultaneous eigenfunctions for the Dehn twist around γ, we can construct the isomorphism and prove the conjecture.

Rank 1 case For G = PGL 2, this amounts to simultaneously diagonalizing the geodesic length operator H = e 2πb ˆp + e 2πb ˆp + e 2πbˆx (b R) and the Dehn twist operator D. Kashaev 00: the operators H, D have common eigenfunctions Ψ λ, λ R >0, with eigenvalues H Ψ λ = 2 cosh(λ)ψ λ, D Ψ λ = e 2πiλ2 Ψ λ.

Rank 1 case The eigenfuctions Ψ λ are orthogonal and complete: δ(λ µ) Ψ λ (x)ψ µ (x)dx = m(λ) where the spectral measure is and q = e πib2. R R >0 Ψ λ (x)ψ λ (y)m(λ)dλ = δ(x y), m(λ) = sinh(bλ) sinh(b 1 λ),

Higher rank: quantum Coxeter Toda system How to generalize Kashaev s result to higher rank gauge groups? First, we need to identify the operators Ĥ 1,..., Ĥ n. Theorem (S. Shapiro 17) When G = PGL n, there exists a cluster for X q G,S in which the operators Ĥ1,..., Ĥn are identified with the Hamiltonians of the quantum Coxeter Toda integrable system.

Classical Coxeter Toda system Fix G = PGL n (C), equipped with a pair of opposite Borel subgroups B ±, torus H, and Weyl group W S n. We have Bruhat cell decompositions G = B + ub + u W = v W B vb. The double Bruhat cell corresponding to a pair (u, v) W W is G u,v := (B + ub + ) (B vb ).

Poisson structure on G There is a natural Poisson structure on G with the following key properties: G u,v G are all Poisson subvarieties, whose Poisson structure descends to quotient G u,v /Ad H. The algebra of conjugation invariant functions C[G] Ad G (generated by traces of finite dimensional representations of G) is Poisson commutative: f 1, f 2 C[G] Ad G = {f 1, f 2 } = 0

Classical Coxter Toda systems Hoffmann Kellendonk-Kutz-Reshetikhin 00: Suppose u, v are both Coxeter elements in W (each simple reflection appears exactly once in their reduced decompositions) e.g. G = PGL 4, u = s 1 s 2 s 3, v = s 1 s 2 s 3. In particular, Coxeter elements have length l(u) = dim(h) = l(v)

Classical Coxeter Toda systems In this Coxeter case, dim(g u,v /Ad H ) = l(u) + l(v) = 2dim(H). And we have dim(h) many independent generators of our Poisson commutative subalgebra C[G] G (one for each fundamental weight) = we get an integrable system on G u,v /Ad H, called the Coxter Toda system.

Double Bruhat cells Berenstein Fomin Zelevinsky: the double Bruhat cells G u,v, and their quotients G u,v /Ad H are cluster Poisson varieties. e.g. is G = PGL 4, u = s 1 s 2 s 3, v = s 1 s 2 s 3. The quiver for G u,v /Ad H

Cluster Poisson structure on G The Poisson bracket on C[G u,v ] is compatible with the cluster structure: if Y 1,..., Y d are cluster coordinates in chart labelled by quiver Q, {Y j, Y k } = ɛ jk Y j Y k, where ɛ jk = #(j k) #(k j) is the signed adjacency matrix of the quiver.

Quantization of Coxeter Toda system Consider the Heisenberg algebra H n generated by x 1,..., x n ; p 1,..., p n, acting on L 2 (R n ), via [p j, x k ] = δ jk 2πi p j 1 2πi x j

Quantization of Coxeter Toda system A representation of the quantum torus algebra for the Coxeter Toda quiver: e.g. Ŷ 2 acts by multiplication by positive operator e 2πb(x 2 x 1 ).

Cluster construction of quantum Hamiltonians Let s add an extra node to our quiver, along with a spectral parameter u:

Construction of quantum Hamiltonians Theorem (S. Shapiro) Consider the operator Q n (u) obtained by mutating consecutively at 0, 1, 2,..., 2n. Then 1 The quiver obtained after these mutations is isomorphic to the original; 2 The unitary operators Q n (u) satisfy [Q n (u), Q n (v)] = 0, 3 If A(u) = Q n (u ib/2)q n (u + ib/2) 1, then one can expand n A(u) = H k U k, k=0 U := e 2πbu and the commuting operators H 1,..., H n quantize the Coxeter Toda Hamiltonians.

Example: G = PGL 4

Example: G = PGL 4

Example: G = PGL 4

Example: G = PGL 4

Example: G = PGL 4

Example: G = PGL 4

Example: G = PGL 4

Example: G = PGL 4

The Dehn twist The Dehn twist operator D n from quantum Teichmüller theory corresponds to mutation at all even vertices 2, 4,..., 2n: We have [D n, Q n (u)] = 0

Quantum Coxeter Toda eigenfunctions Kharchev Lebedev Semenov-Tian-Shansky 02: recursive construction of common eigenfunctions for gl n Hamiltonians H 1,..., H n via Mellin Barnes integrals: Ψ gl n+1 λ 1,...,λ n+1 (x 1,..., x n+1 ) = R n K(λ, γ x n+1 )Ψ gl n γ 1,...,γ n (x 1,..., x n )dγ. The b Whittaker functions Ψ gl n λ 1,...,λ n satisfy H k Ψ gl n λ 1,...,λ n = e k (λ)ψ gl n λ 1,...,λ n, where e k (λ) is the k th elementary symmetric function in e 2πbλ 1,..., e 2πbλn.

Cluster construction of quantum Toda eigenfunctions Using the cluster realization of the Toda Hamiltonians, we give a dual recursive construction of the b Whittaker functions: we expand Ψ gl n+1 λ 1,...,λ n+1 (x 1,..., x n+1 ) = R n L(x, y λ n+1 )Ψ gl n λ 1,...,λ n (y 1,..., y n )dy. Using this construction, we can compute the eigenvalues of the Dehn twist D n ; and establish orthogonality and completeness of the b Whittaker functions.

Construction of the eigenfunctions Problem: Construct complete set of joint eigenfunctions for operators Q n (u), D n. e.g. n = 1. Q 1 (u) = ϕ(p 1 + u) If λ R, Ψ λ (x 1 ) = e 2πiλx 1 satisfies Q 1 (u)ψ λ (x 1 ) = ϕ(λ + u)ψ λ (x 1 ). (equivalent to formula for Fourier transform of ϕ(z))

Recursive construction of the eigenfunctions Recursive construction: we want to find an operator R n+1 n (λ) such that R n+1 n (λ n+1 ) Ψ gl n λ 1,...,λ n = Ψ gl n+1 λ 1,...,λ n+1 Set where λ = i(b+b 1 ) 2 λ. Pengaton identity = R n+1 n (λ) = Q n (λ e 2πiλx n+1 ) ϕ(x n+1 x n ), Q n+1 (u) Rn n+1 (λ) = ϕ(u + λ) R n+1 n (λ) Q n (u).

Recursive construction of the eigenfunctions So given a gl n eigenvector Ψ gl n λ 1,...,λ n (x 1,..., x n ) satisfying Q n (u)ψ gl n λ 1,...,λ n = n k=1 we can build a gl n+1 eigenvector satisfying Ψ gl n+1 ϕ(u + λ k ) Ψ gl n λ 1,...,λ n, λ 1,...,λ n+1 (x 1,..., x n+1 ) := R n+1 n (λ n+1 ) Ψ gl n λ 1,...,λ n Q n+1 (u)ψ gl n+1 n+1 λ 1,...,λ n+1 = ϕ(u + λ k ) Ψ gl n+1 λ 1,...,λ n+1. k=1

Dehn twist eigenvalue Similarly, the pentagon identity implies D n+1 R n+1 n (λ) = e πiλ2 R n+1 n (λ)d n, so by the recursion we derive the Dehn twist spectrum D n Ψ λ1,...,λ n = e πi(λ2 1 + +λ2 n ) Ψ λ1,...,λ n.

A modular b analog of Givental s integral formula Writing all the Rn n+1 (λ) as integral operators, we get an explicit Givental type integral formula for the eigenfunctions: Ψ (n) λ n 1 ( (x) = e2πiλnx j=1 j k=1 e 2πit j (λ j λ j+1 ) j ϕ(t j,k t j,k 1 ) k=2 dt j,k ϕ(t j,k t j+1,k c b )ϕ(t j+1,k+1 t j,k ) where t n,1 = x 1,..., t n,n = x n. e.g. n = 4 we integrate over all but the last row of the array t 11 t 21 t 22 t 31 t 32 t 33 x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 ),

Orthogonality and completeness Using the cluster recursive construction of Ψ gl n, we can prove the orthogonality and completeness relations R n Ψ gl n λ (x)ψgl n µ (x)dx = δ(λ µ), m(λ) R n Ψ gl n λ (x)ψgl n µ (y)m(λ)dλ = δ(x y), with spectral measure m(λ) = j<k sinh(πb(λ j λ k )) sinh(πb 1 (λ j λ k )).

Unitarity of the b Whittaker transform Theorem (S. Shapiro) The b Whittaker transform (W[f ])(λ) = is a unitary equivalence. Ψ gl n λ R n (x)f (x)dx This completes the proof of the Fock Goncharov conjecture for G = PGL n.