Nucleosynthesis in Jets from A Collapsar before The Formation of A Black Hole

Similar documents
PoS(NIC XII)250. A new equation of state with abundances of all nuclei in core collapse simulations of massive stars

PoS(GRB 2012)103. Constraints to the GRB central engine from jet penetrability to massive stars

NUCLEOSYNTHESIS INSIDE GAMMA-RAY BURST ACCRETION DISKS AND ASSOCIATED OUTFLOWS

Integrated nucleosynthesis in neutrino-driven winds

Supernovae, Gamma-Ray Bursts, and Stellar Rotation

Spectrum of the Supernova Relic Neutrino Background

Progress of supernova simulations with the Shen equation of state

Nuclear physics input for the r-process

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 27 Jul 2004

Nobuya Nishimura Keele University, UK

Hirschegg Supernova core collapse. dynamics of core collapse. simple and efficient parameterization of deleptonization

Nucleosynthesis in core-collapse supernovae. Almudena Arcones

Three-dimensional simulation of magneto-rotationally driven core-collapse supernovae

Neutrinos and Nucleosynthesis from Black Hole Accretion Disks. Gail McLaughlin North Carolina State University

Core Collapse Supernovae An Emerging Picture Stephen W. Bruenn

Formation and evolution of BH and accretion disk in Collapsar

Neutron star structure explored with a family of unified equations of state of neutron star matter

Numerical Study on GRB-Jet Formation in Collapsars

Nucleosynthesis of heavy elements. Almudena Arcones Helmholtz Young Investigator Group

Neutron star post-merger simulations: origin of kilonovae and the heavy elements

14 Supernovae (short overview) introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

The Collapsar Model for Gamma-Ray Bursts

Friday, April 29, 2011

!"#$%&%'()*%+),#-."/(0)+1,-.%'"#,$%+)* 2%$3-,-4+)4()$0,$%+)-+) 56",$%+)-+7-.$,$(-859.:

Low Energy Neutrinos from Black Hole - Accretion Disks

Supernova Explosions and Observable Consequences

Neutrinos from Black Hole Accretion Disks

Implicit Lagrangian method on variable triangular grid for magnetorotational supernova simulations Sergey Moiseenko

Nucleosynthesis of molybdenum in neutrino-driven winds

The role of neutrinos in collapse-driven supernovae

Nuclear robustness of the r process in neutron-star mergers

The role of neutrinos in the formation of heavy elements. Gail McLaughlin North Carolina State University

Nucleosynthesis from Black Hole Accretion Disks. Gail McLaughlin North Carolina State University Rebecca Surman Union College

Recent 2D/3D Core-Collapse Supernovae Simulations Results Obtained with the CHIMERA Code Stephen W. Bruenn

Supernova neutrinos and their implications for supernova physics

τ coll 10 V ff g cm 3 Core collapse triggered by K-captures, photodissociation 1000 km Collapse (only core inner ~1.5 MO) Free-fall 1010 g cm-3

Compschool, Copenhagen Core-Collapse Supernovae. Large cancellation effects in the total energy budget:

General Relativistic MHD Simulations of Neutron Star Mergers

The r-process of nucleosynthesis: overview of current status. Gail McLaughlin North Carolina State University

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 28 Dec 2010

The Detailed Abundance Patterns of Light Neutron-Capture Elements in Very Metal-Poor Stars

Thorium (Th) Enrichment in the Milky Way Galaxy

Extreme Transients in the Multimessenger Era

Tomoya Takiwaki (RIKEN)

Lecture 15. Explosive Nucleosynthesis and the r-process

The r-process and the νp-process

NUMERICAL STUDY OF GAMMA-RAY BURST JET FORMATION IN COLLAPSARS

ASTRONOMY 220C ADVANCED STAGES OF STELLAR EVOLUTION AND NUCLEOSYNTHESIS. Spring, 2013

Multidimensional modeling of core-collapse supernovae: New challenges and perspectives

Gravitational Waves from Supernova Core Collapse: Current state and future prospects

Nucleosynthesis in core-collapse supernovae

Gravitational Waves from Supernova Core Collapse: What could the Signal tell us?

Supernovae and Nucleosynthesis in Zero and Low Metal Stars. Stan Woosley and Alex Heger

HPC in Physics. (particularly astrophysics) Reuben D. Budiardja Scientific Computing National Institute for Computational Sciences

Core-collapse supernova simulations in three dimensions

Stellar Explosions (ch. 21)

PoS(NIC XI)079. The r-process the theoretical/astrophysical side. Shinya Wanajo 1,2, Hans-Thomas Janka 2, and Bernhard Müller 2

Neutrinos and explosive nucleosynthesis

Jin Matsumoto. Numerical Experiments of GRB Jets. RIKEN Astrophysical Big Bang Laboratory

PUSHing CORE-COLLAPSE SUPERNOVAE TO EXPLOSIONS IN SPHERICAL SYMMETRY

Explosive nucleosynthesis of heavy elements:

Nucleosynthesis in Core Collapse Supernovae: Knowns and Unknown. Friedrich-K. Thielemann Dept. of Physics University of Basel

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 25 Aug 2004

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 19 Oct 1998

Asymmetric Neutrino Emissions and Magnetic Structures of Magnetars in Relativistic Quantum Approach

ASTRONOMY 220C ADVANCED STAGES OF STELLAR EVOLUTION AND NUCLEOSYNTHESIS. Spring, This is a one quarter course dealing chiefly with:

Supernova Explosion Mechanisms

Two- and three-dimensional simulations of core-collapse supernovae with CHIMERA

Delayed Outflows from BH Accretion Tori Following Neutron Star Binary Coalescence. Brian Metzger

Institut d Astronomie et d Astrophysique, Université Libre de Bruxelle, Belgium

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 28 Nov 2008

Gamma-Ray Astronomy. Astro 129: Chapter 1a

Projected shell model for nuclear structure and weak interaction rates

R-process in Low Entropy Neutrino Driven Winds

POSTBOUNCE EVOLUTION OF CORE-COLLAPSE SUPERNOVAE: LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF THE EQUATION OF STATE

A Turbulent Dynamo in Rotating Magnetized Core-Collapse Supernovae

Role of neutrinos for the nucleosynthesis of heavy elements beyond iron in explosions of massive stars

Observable constraints on nucleosynthesis conditions in Type Ia supernovae

Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event MIT Invitational

Probing the Creation of the Heavy Elements in Neutron Star Mergers

Theoretical Supernova Modeling: Exploring the Progenitor-Explosion-Remnant Connection by Neutrino-Driven Explosion Models

Secondary Fe-peak nuclei in the Tycho Supernova Remnant: A Promising Tracer of Type Ia Progenitor Metallicity

General-Relativistic Simulations of Stellar Collapse and The Formation of Stellar-Mass Black Holes

Physics HW Set 3 Spring 2015

Synergy with Gravitational Waves

Supernova mixing to reproduce isotopic ratios of presolar grains

Gamma-Ray Bursts: The Central Engine

High Energy Astrophysics

Compact Binaries - 3 ASTR2110 Sarazin

Jin Matsumoto. Relativistic HD/MHD Flow for GRB Jets. RIKEN Astrophysical Big Bang Laboratory

Nuclear structure and stellar weak interaction rates of nuclei below the 132 Sn core

Long Gamma Ray Bursts from metal poor/pop III stars. Sung-Chul Yoon (Amsterdam) Norbert Langer (Utrecht) Colin Norman (JHU/STScI)

AGB Evolution and Nucleosynthesis at Low-Metallicity Constrained by the Star Formation History of Our Galaxy

Core-collapse Supernove through Cosmic Time...

Life and Evolution of a Massive Star. M ~ 25 M Sun

Parametrization of the effect of weak interactions on the production of heavy elements in binary neutron star mergers.

Explosion Mechanism, Neutrino Burst, and Gravitational Wave in Core-Collapse Supernovae

Core-Collapse Supernovae and Neutrino Transport

Rubidium, zirconium, and lithium production in massive AGB stars

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph] 10 Dec 2008

Transcription:

before The Formation of A Black Hole Kumamoto National College of Technology, Kumamoto 861-1102, Japan E-mail: fujimoto@ec.knct.ac.jp Nobuya Nishimura, Masa-aki Hashimoto, Department of Physics, School of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 810-8560, Japan Kei Kotake Division of Theoretical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatory Japan, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, Japan Shoichi Yamada Science & Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan We have investigated nucleosynthesis inside the jets from a 35 M, low-metallicity collapsar before the formation of a black hole, based on a two-dimensional magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) simulation of the collapsar, taking into account neutrino interactions both on the MHD simulation and nucleosynthesis. We find that jets are ejected via the magnetic pressure, and that r-process operates in the jets even if the neutrino absorption is taken into account in the nucleosynthesis calculation. This is due to efficient electron captures in the high-density ( 10 11 gcm 3 ) region near the rotational axis, fast ejection (> 0.2 in units of speed of light), and relatively low neutrino luminosity (< 5 10 52 ergss 1 ). Chemical composition of the neutron-rich nuclei in jets from collapsars with different mass and rotation could be largely different from each other. 10th Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos July 27 - August 1, 2008 Mackinac Island, Michigan, USA Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/

1. Introduction For a star more massive than 35-40M, the stellar core is considered to promptly collapse to a black hole during the collapse. When the star has sufficiently high angular momentum before the collapse, an accretion disk is formed around the black hole and jets are shown to be launched from the inner region of the disk through magnetic processes [1]. Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are expected to be driven by the jets. This scenario of GRBs is referred to as the collapsar model [2], which seems to be promising, because of the accumulating observations that imply an association between GRBs and the deaths of massive stars. Such the rotating massive star is called as a collapsar. Although various astrophysical objects have been proposed as a r-process site, there is no compelling condidates [3]. It has been suggested that a collapsar could produce r-elements [4, 5]. We have shown that r-process successfully operates in the jets from collapsars, in particular jets with high energies [6, 7]. Although we investigated nucleosynthesis in the jets after the formation of a black hole in our previous study, nucleosynthesis in the jets before the black-hole formation could be different from that after the formation due to the presence of a proto neutron-star [8]. Moreover, recent elaborate simulations of the spherical collapse of a 40 M star has shown that the collapse of the stellar core to a black hole takes 0.6-1.3s after the core bounce [9]. In the present study, we perform a two-dimensional simulation of a collapsar before the formation of the black hole. Then, we calculate the chemical composition of jets from the collapsar to investigate differences of the chemical composition of jets ejected before and after the black-hole formation. 2. MHD Simulation of A Collapsar We have carried out Newtonian magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) calculation of the collapse of a rotating, magnetized massive star. The numerical code for the MHD calculations employed in this paper is based on that used in the study on aspherical core collapse of a star [10]. The self-gravity of the star is taken into account. We use a realistic equation of state (EOS) based on the relativistic mean field theory [11] and an another EOS [12] for lower density regime (ρ < 10 5 g/cm 3 ), where no data is available in the EOS table with the Shen EOS. The use of the realistic EOSs is important for nucleosynthesis, because its enable us to evaluate temperatures of fluid preciously. Not as in the previous work [1, 6, 7], we follow the evolution of electron fraction, taking into account the change in the fraction due to electron and positron capture and neutrino and anti-neutrino absorption in terms of a leakage scheme [13]. Calculations are performed over the central region of a massive star with spherical coordinates, (r,θ,φ). The computational domain is extended over 0km r 5000km and 0 θ π/2 and covered with 300(r) 48(θ) meshes. We assume that the fluid is axisymmetric and the mirror symmetry on the equatorial plane. We set the initial profiles of the density, temperature and electron fraction to those of the 1.5 dimensional model of a 35M massive star before the collapse, or 35OC model [14], which is a low-metallicity star (0.1Z ) with a low mass-loss rate during its Wolf-Rayet phase. We note that evolution of radial distribution of angular velocity and magnetic fields is taken into account in the model [14]. We adopt an initial distribution of angular velocity as that of 35OC model. 2

Initial magnetic field is assumed to be uniform with a vertical component of 10 11 G and a toroidal component of 8 10 11 G. We note that the toroidal component is comparable to that in 35OC model, while the vertical one is about a factor of five larger. It should be noted that the magnetic pressure is much smaller than the other pressure. We briefly summarize results of the MHD simulation of the collapsar. Central iron core collapses and then bounces at 380ms after the start of the simulation. Just after the core bounce, neutrino burst occurs and then luminosities of all flavors of neutrinos decrease to < 6 10 52 ergss 1, at the epoch of jet-launch (80ms after the bounce). We note that the luminosities are less than those for spherical collapse because of lower mass accretion rates due to rotation. The jets are ejected via the magnetic pressure, which is amplified via field wrapping and magneto-rotational instability. We find the jets ejected along the rotational axis (< 5 degree) have high density (> 10 11 gcm 3 ) above the neutrino sphere. 3. Nucleosynthesis in collapsar In order to calculate chemical composition of material inside the jets, we need Lagrangian evolution of physical quantities, such as density, temperature, and, velocity of the material. We adopt a tracer particle method, as in [6, 7], to calculate the Lagrangian evolution of the physical quantities from the Eulerian evolution obtained from the MHD simulation of the collapsar. Particles are initially placed from an iron core to an inner O-rich layer. The numbers of the particles in a layer are weighted to the mass in the layer. The total number of the particles is set to be 3000. The numbers of the particles in a layer are weighted to the mass of the layer. We find 213 jet particles that are particles ejected through the jets. ρ max (g cm -3 ) 1e+15 1e+14 1e+13 1e+12 1e+11 1e+10 1e+09 1e+08 1e+07 1e+06 1e+10 1e+11 Tmax (K) ρ max (g cm -3 ) 1e+15 1e+14 1e+13 1e+12 1e+11 1e+10 1e+09 1e+08 1e+07 1e+06 0.001 0.01 0.1 V r,max /c Figure 1: Maximum density vs maximum temperature (left panel) and maximum density vs maximum radial velocity (right panel) of all the jet particles. Figure 1 shows maximum density as a function of maximum temperature (left panel) or maximum radial velocity (right panel) of all the jet particles. We find that a large fraction of jet particles fall inside the proto-neutron star, where the particles attain to very high densities (> 10 11 gcm 3 ) and temperatures (> 10 11 K), and are in β-equilibrium. For densities > 10 11 gcm 3, we set electron fraction of these jet particles to be the fraction taken from the MHD simulation, in which the evolution of electron fraction is taken into account with the leakage scheme. During the ejection through the jets, the density of the particles decreases, and β-equilibrium cannot maintain. In these relatively low-density region, we need to evaluate the evolution of electron fraction carefully. In the 3

present study, we have estimated change in the electron fraction, taking into account the capture of electrons and positrons on nucleons and the absorption of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos via nucleons for densities < 10 11 gcm 3. The rate of the absorption is calculated with neutrino and anti-neutrino number flux, which is globally evaluated from the distribution of density, temperature, and electron fraction taken from the MHD simulation, at the particle position. We set chemical composition of a jet particles with temperature > 9 10 9 K to be that in nuclear statistical equilibrium (NSE), whose abundances are expressed with simple analytical expressions, specified by the density, temperature and electron fraction. In the relatively cool regime < 9 10 9 K, NSE breaks and the chemical composition is calculated with a nuclear reaction network, which includes about 4000 nuclei from neutron and proton up to Fermium (see NETWORK B of Table 1 in [8]). The experimental masses and reaction rates are adopted if available or theoretical masses and rates are taken into account otherwise (see [6] for detailed nuclear data). Moreover, spontaneous and β-delayed fission and the asymmetric distribution of fission yields are taken into account in the network. Abundance 0.01 0.001 1e-04 1e-05 1e-06 1e-07 50 100 150 200 250 Mass number Ye(NSE) = 0.2 Ye(NSE) = 0.3 Ye(NSE) = 0.4 Figure 2: Abundances of three neutron-rich jet particles with Y e (NSE) = 0.2 (filled squares), 0.3 (filled circles), and 0.4 (open circles) after decays. We find that there exist neutron-rich jet particles with Y e (NSE) < 0.4, where Y e (NSE) is the electron fraction of a jet particle at temperature of 9 10 9 K. In particular, jet particles with Y e (NSE) < 0.3 are ejected along the rotational axis (< 5 degree). This is due to efficient electron captures in the high-density ( 10 11 gcm 3 ) region near the rotational axis, fast ejection (> 0.2 in units of speed of light; see right panel in Fig. 1), and relatively low neutrino luminosity (< 5 10 52 ergss 1 ). Figure 2 shows abundances after decays of three neutron-rich jet particles with Y e (NSE) = 0.2 (filled squares), 0.3 (filled circles), and 0.4 (open circles). We find that r-process operates in jet particles with Y e (NSE) 0.2 to produce U and Th. It should be noted that r-process operates in the collapsar jets even if the neutrino absorption is taken into account. Hence, neutrinos cannot kill the r-process. However, nuclei with mass number < 180 and atomic number < 80 are unlikely to be abundant, because of a small amount of the jet particles with Y e (NSE) 0.2. We emphasize that jets from collapsars after the black-hole formation have abundant neutron-rich ejecta with Y e (NSE) < 0.2 [6, 7], in which U and Th are synthesized abundantly. Abundance profile of the jets are similar to that of solar r-elements. 4

4. Summary We have investigated nucleosynthesis inside the jets from a 35 M collapsar before the formation of a black hole, based on two-dimensional MHD simulations of the collapsar, taking into account neutrino interactions both on the MHD simulation and nucleosynthesis calculation reasonably. We set initial condition of the collapsar as those of 35OC model [14], which is a lowmetallicity star (0.1Z ) with a low mass-loss rate during its Wolf-Rayet phase, and in which the evolution of radial distribution of angular velocity and magnetic fields is taken into account. We find that jets are ejected via the magnetic pressure, and that the jets ejected along the rotational axis (< 5 degree) have high density (> 10 11 gcm 3 ) above the neutrino sphere. We also find that r-process operates in jet particles with Y e (NSE) 0.2 to produce U and Th, even if we take into account the neutrino absorption in the nucleosynthesis calculation. This is due to efficient electron captures in the high-density ( 10 11 gcm 3 ) region near the rotational axis, fast ejection (> 0.2 in units of speed of light), and relatively low neutrino luminosity (< 5 10 52 ergss 1 ) caused by rotation of the progenitor (Sec. 2). Nuclei with mass number < 180 and atomic number < 80 are unlikely to be abundant. Abundances of neutron-rich nuclei of collapsar jets are significantly affected by properties of the jets, such as density distribution and ejection speed, as well as properties of proto-neutron star, such as neutrino luminosities and distribution of the electron fraction. Therefore, chemical composition of the neutron-rich nuclei in the jets from collapsars with different mass and rotation could be largely different from each other. References [1] Fujimoto, S., Kotake, K., Yamada, S., Hashimoto, M., & Sato, K. 2006, ApJ, 644, 1040 [2] Woosley, S. E. 1993, ApJ, 405, 273 [3] Arnould, M., Goriely, S., & Takahashi, K. 2007, Phys. Rep. 450, 97 [4] Pruet, J., Thompson, T. A., & Hoffman, R. D. 2004, ApJ, 606, 1006 [5] Fujimoto, S., Hashimoto, M., Arai, K., & Matsuba, R. 2004, ApJ, 614, 817 [6] Fujimoto, S., Hashimoto, M., Kotake, K., & Yamada, S. 2007, ApJ, 656, 382 [7] Fujimoto, S., Nishimura, N., & Hashimoto, M. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1350 [8] Nishimura, S., Kotake, K., Hashimoto, M., Yamada, S., Nishimura, N., Fujimoto, S., & Sato, K. 2006, ApJ, 642, 410 [9] Sumiyoshi, K., Yamada, S., & Suzuki, H. 2007, ApJ, 667, 382 [10] Kotake, K., Sawai, H., Yamada, S., & Sato, K. 2004, ApJ, 608, 391 [11] Shen, H., Toki, H., Oyamatsu, K., & Sumiyoshi, K. 1998, Nucl. Phys. A., 637, 435 [12] Blinnikov, S. I., Dunina-Barkovskaya, N. V., & Nadyozhin, D. K. 1996, ApJS, 106, 171 [13] Ruffert, M., Janka, H.-T., & Schaefer, G. 1996, A&A, 311, 532 [14] Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2006, ApJ, 637, 914 5