Estimates of Parameters Used By Model B3

Similar documents
Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

Minimizing Shrinkage, Creep, and Cracking Damage to Concrete Bridges

STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE ADAPT-ABI. Addendum to Construction Phase Modeling and Analysis

Application of Thermal Stress Device for Measuring Thermal Stresses

Hardened Concrete. Lecture No. 16

APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations

Note: For further information, including the development of creep with time, Annex B may be used.

APPENDIX H CONVERSION FACTORS

Creep and aging in nonlinear models for concrete

A SIMPLE TWO-STAGE MODEL FOR SIMULATING DRYING SHRINKAGE VS. MASS-LOSS EVOLUTION OF CONCRETE

Part 9: Shrinkage for service and accident conditions

Yuko Ogawa, Ryoichi Sato and Kenji Kawai Institute of Engineering, Hiroshima University, Japan

Early Age Tests to Predict 28 Days Compressive Strength of Concrete

Numerical Simulation on Concrete Pouring Process of Self-Compacting Concrete-Filled Steel Tube

Basic Examination on Assessing Mechanical Properties of Concrete That Has Suffered Combined Deterioration from Fatigue and Frost Damage

CIVE 2700: Civil Engineering Materials Fall Lab 2: Concrete. Ayebabomo Dambo

DRYING CREEP OF CONCRETE IN TERMS OF AGE-ADJUSTED EFFECTIVE MODULUS METHOD. K. Kovler, DSc

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE WITH SAP PART II: MODULUS OF ELASTICITY

The University of Texas at Austin

Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns

Numerical Prediction of Crack Width in Massive Concrete Member due to Heat of Hydration

Improved Estimation of Long-Term Relaxation Function from Compliance Function of Aging Concrete

= 0.7 (6) = 0.62 (7) = 0.60 (8)

ACET 406 Mid-Term Exam B

Software Verification

Steel Cross Sections. Structural Steel Design

Task 4: Testing Iowa Portland Cement Concrete Mixtures for the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Procedure

RESEARCH INTO THE CORRELATION BETWEEN CONCRETE STRENGHT AND UPV VALUES. B. Tumendemberel, Ts. Baigalimaa

Time-dependent effects on dynamic properties of cable-stayed bridges

Lecture 7 Constitutive Behavior of Asphalt Concrete

A Spatial FEM Model of Thermal and Mechanical Action in RCC dam

CHAPTER 4 STATISTICAL MODELS FOR STRENGTH USING SPSS

HEALTH MONITORING OF EARLY AGE CONCRETE

Accelerated Testing Methodology for Long Term Durability of CFRP

Modulus Of Elasticity And Poissons Ratio

The development of a new method for the proportioning of high-performance concrete mixtures

Study on estimation of compressive strength of concrete in structure using ultrasonic method

Chapter 2 Concrete with Recycled Aggregates: Experimental Investigations

Software Verification

COHESIVE CRACK MODELING OF INFLUENCE OF SUDDEN CHANGES IN LOADING RATE ON CONCRETE FRACTURE

This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced concrete columns when the ACI code is selected.

TESTING AND MODELLING OF MORTAR EARLY-AGE BEHAVIOUR FOR DURABILITY PREDICTION

The Behavior of Aged Concrete Gravity Dam under the Effect of Isotropic Degradation Caused by Hygro- Chemo-Mechanical Actions

Introduction to Engineering Materials ENGR2000. Dr. Coates

MICROMECHANICAL MODELS FOR CONCRETE

3. Which dynasty ruled Bengal for long 400 years? Who was the founder of this dynasty?

Card Variable MID RO E PR ECC QH0 FT FC. Type A8 F F F F F F F. Default none none none 0.2 AUTO 0.3 none none

EARLY AGE THERMAL CRACK CONTROL IN MASS CONCRETE

NCHRP Project High Performance/High-Strength Lightweight Concrete for Bridge Girders and Decks

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

A MICROMECHANIC MODEL FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF CEMENT PASTE AT EARLY AGE VALIDATED WITH EXPERIMENTS

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Measuring the Effectiveness of Cure Materials

Nondestructive Monitoring of Setting and Hardening of Portland Cement Mortar with Sonic Methods

Quality control based on electrical resistivity measurements

Copyright 2014 Tech Science Press CMC, vol.44, no.2, pp.73-84, 2014

USE OF DUNE SAND AS AN ALTERNATIVE FINE AGGREGATE IN CONCRETE AND MORTAR. Department of civil Engineering, The Open University Sri Lanka

TEST REPORT No. 50 PERFORMED TESTS:

Solution: The strain in the bar is: ANS: E =6.37 GPa Poison s ration for the material is:

MATERIALS FOR CIVIL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS

Aggregates for Concrete

REGRESSION MODELING FOR STRENGTH AND TOUGHNESS EVALUATION OF HYBRID FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE

MODELING THE EFFECTIVE ELASTIC MODULUS OF RC BEAMS EXPOSED TO FIRE

Rigid Pavement Mechanics. Curling Stresses

Prediction and measurement of the elastic modulus of the RCC: Case of the low cement proportioning

Mechanical Properties of Polymers. Scope. MSE 383, Unit 3-1. Joshua U. Otaigbe Iowa State University Materials Science & Engineering Dept.

SIMPLIFIED CONCRETE MODELING WITH *MAT_CONCRET_DAMAGE_REL3

6.37 Determine the modulus of resilience for each of the following alloys:

SERVICEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR DEFLECTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SLABS IN MULTI-STORY HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF A TEFLON BASED PIEZOELECTRIC SENSOR EFFECTIVITY FOR THE MONITORING OF EARLY AGE COCRETE STRENGTHING

Prediction of residual stress due to early age behaviour of massive concrete structures: on site experiments and macroscopic modelling

Stress Strain Elasticity Modulus Young s Modulus Shear Modulus Bulk Modulus. Case study

6.4 A cylindrical specimen of a titanium alloy having an elastic modulus of 107 GPa ( psi) and

Mechanical properties 1 Elastic behaviour of materials

MSE 383, Unit 3-3. Joshua U. Otaigbe Iowa State University Materials Science & Engineering Dept.

AUTOGENOUS AND DRYING SHRINKAGE MODELING: FROM PASTE TO CONCRETE

EFFECT OF THE TEST SET-UP ON FRACTURE MECHANICAL PARAMETERS OF CONCRETE

Applied Fluid Mechanics

Modeling Heat and Moisture Transport During Hydration of Cement-Based Materials in Semi- Adiabatic Conditions

CHAPTER- 7 DURABILITY STUDIES ON SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE WITH GGBS AND RHA

AIR BUBBLE STABILITY MECHANISM OF AIR-ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES AND AIR VOID ANALYSIS OF HARDENED CONCRETE

Composites Design and Analysis. Stress Strain Relationship

Table 1. Density and absorption capacity of Chinese and Japanese lightweight aggregates

Strength of Material. Shear Strain. Dr. Attaullah Shah

Research Article Stress-strain Response of High Strength Concrete and Application of the Existing Models

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

A DISCRETE MODEL FOR ALKALI-SILICA-REACTION IN CONCRETE

Microplane Model formulation ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary

Analysis of Non-Linear Dynamic Behaviours in Asphalt Concrete Pavements Under Temperature Variations

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF EARLY AGE AND LONG TERM RESPONSE OF PCC PAVEMENT

ULTRASONIC PULSE METHOD THE CEMENT STRENGTH EVALUATION TOOL

Statistical Models for Hardened Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete

Building Science. Some Interesting Stuff on Slabs. Water Flow Through Slab. Mechanisms of Flow. buildingscience.com 9/25/09

Health Monitoring of Early Age Concrete

Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages

This is the accepted version of a paper presented at 2014 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC).

Concrete Technology Prof. B. Bhattacharjee Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Unified Constitutive Model for Engineering- Pavement Materials and Computer Applications. University of Illinois 12 February 2009

Rock Mechanics and Seismology Laboratory

Solid Mechanics Chapter 1: Tension, Compression and Shear

Transcription:

Appendix C Estimates of Parameters Used By Model B3 C.1 Equations Used By B3 Model B3 (Bažant and Baweja 1995a, Bažant and Baweja 2000a) covers creep and shrinkage of concrete, including their coupling. The compliance function of concrete is approximated by ( t ) J(t,t )=q 1 + q 2 Q(t,t )+q 3 ln[1+(t t ) n ]+q 4 ln t + J d (t,t ) (C.1) where q 1 = 1/E 0 is the inverse of the asymptotic elastic modulus, the terms containing q 2,q 3 and q 4 represent the aging viscoelastic compliance, non-aging viscoelastic compliance and flow compliance, respectively, and J d (t,t ) is the additional compliance due to drying, which is also influenced by the time t 0 at the beginning of drying. In the definition of the compliance function (C.1), times t and t must be in days, q 1, q 2,q 3 and q 4 are empirical constitutive parameters that depend on the specific type of concrete, and function Q is defined by t Q(t,t ns m )= t (s t )+(s t ds ) 1 n (C.2) in which m = 0.5 and n = 0.1 are empirical parameters whose values can be taken the same for all normal concretes. The values of Q(t,t ) can be calculated by numerical evaluation of the integral in (C.2) or by interpolation from a table given in Bažant and Baweja (1995a), or evaluated (for n = 0.1 and m = 0.5 with an error under 1%) using the approximate explicit formula Q(t,t )=Q f (t ) [ 1+ ( Q f (t ) ] ) r(t ) 1/r(t ) Z(t,t ) (C.3) in which 699

700 C Estimates of Parameters Used By Model B3 r(t )=1.7(t ) 0.12 + 8 Z(t,t )=(t ) m ln[1+(t t ) n ] Q f (t )=[0.086(t ) 2/9 + 1.21(t ) 4/9 ] 1 (C.4) (C.5) (C.6) The average drying shrinkage strain in a cross section, ε sh, and the drying creep compliance, J d, are estimated using formulae ε sh (t)= εsh ( ) 1 h 3 env S(t t0 ) (C.7) J d (t,t )= q 5 e g(t t 0) e g(t t 0 ) (C.8) with auxiliary functions S and g given by ˆt S(ˆt)=tanh, τ sh = k t (k s D) 2 (C.9) τ sh g(ˆt)=8[1 (1 h env )S(ˆt)] (C.10) In the above, h env is the environmental relative humidity, t 0 is the age of concrete at the end of curing, D is the equivalent thickness of the concrete member and k s is a correction factor that takes into account the shape of the member (see Table C.1). Parameters ε sh, k t and q 5 need to be determined by fitting of experimental data or estimated from composition. Table C.1 Values of shape factor k s specimen shape k s infinite slab 1.00 infinite cylinder 1.15 infinite square prism 1.25 sphere 1.30 cube 1.55 C.2 Prediction of Model Parameters Ideally, the material parameters should be determined from long-term creep and shrinkage tests performed on the specific concrete that will be used in the particular structure. In practical applications, it is impossible to wait with the analysis until such tests are finished. The parameters can be crudely estimated from empirical formulae that have been established by fitting a large experimental database for various types of concrete and correlating the obtained model parameters to the concrete strength and composition.

C.2 Prediction of Model Parameters 701 Table C.2 Concrete properties serving as input data Property Symbol in-lb units SI units mean compression strength f c psi MPa water content w lb/ft 3 kg/m 3 cement content c lb/ft 3 kg/m 3 aggregate content a lb/ft 3 kg/m 3 Since the coefficients that appear in the approximate formulae are not dimensionless, their values depend on the choice of the system of units. We present here alternative formulae valid in inch-pound (in-lb) system units and in SI (metric) units. The entire parameter evaluation must be done in one selected system of units. The age of concrete at the onset of drying, t 0, is always given in days. The required input data specifying the strength and composition of concrete are summarized in Table C.2. The compression strength f c should be determined as the statistical average of test results on cylinders of diameter 15 cm (6 inches) and length 30 cm (12 inches) at age 28 days. 1 The content of water, cement and aggregates is the mass of the component per unit volume of concrete mix. If the water and cement contents to be used have not yet been decided, they may be estimated from the empirical correlation of the water/cement ratio to the required design strength (mean compressive cylinder strength after 28 days) of concrete (Neville 1997), ( ) 1 w f c = c + 0.535 (C.11) f ref where the reference strength f ref = 22.8 MPa=3307 psi corresponds to w/c=0.65. The formulae for predicting the creep and shrinkage parameters are presented in Table C.3. 1 Note that design codes deal with a certain safely estimated strength value, which is significantly lower than the mean. The CEB code uses the so-called characteristic strength, f ck, while the ACI code uses the specified design strength, f c; see Appendix E.1 for details.

Table C.3 Prediction formulae for creep parameters according to the B3 model Line Phenomenon Parameter Inch-pound formula Units SI formula Units 1 basic creep q 1 10.526 f c 0.5 10 6 /psi 126.77 f c 0.5 2 q 2 451.1c 0.5 f c 0.9 10 6 /psi 185.4c 0.5 f c 0.9 3 q 3 0.29(w/c) 4 q 2 10 6 /psi 0.29(w/c) 4 q 2 4 q 4 0.14(a/c) 0.7 10 6 /psi 20.3(a/c) 0.7 5 shrinkage k t 190.8t 0.08 0 f c 1/4 days/in 2 0.085t0 0.08 f c 1/4 days/mm 2 6 εs ( α 1 α 2 26w 2.1 f c 0.28 + 270 ) 10 6 ( α 1 α 2 0.019w 2.1 f c 0.28 + 270 ) 10 6 7 ε sh ε s 0.57514 3+14/(t 0 + τ sh ) 10 6 ε s 0.57514 3+14/(t 0 + τ sh ) 10 6 8 drying creep q 5 7.57 10 5 f 1 c ( ) ε 0.6 sh 10 6 /psi 7.57 10 5 f c 1 ( ) ε 0.6 sh 702 C Estimates of Parameters Used By Model B3

C.2 Prediction of Model Parameters 703 The formula in line 7 of Table C.3 originally comes from ε sh = ε s E(7+600) E(t 0 + τ sh ) (C.12) The fraction on the right-hand side is a correction for aging, because the final value of shrinkage depends not only on the material properties, but also on the interplay between hardening and drying. If the drying process starts later and takes more time, concrete becomes stiffer and its shrinkage is reduced. To take that into account, a reference value εs is defined as the final shrinkage strain exhibited by the given concrete if drying starts at 7 days and shrinkage halftime is 600 days. This value is considered as dependent only on material properties and type of curing, and is estimated using the formula in line 6. Under general conditions, it is modified by the above mentioned factor, defined as the ratio between the elastic modulus at 607 days (i.e., somewhere in the middle of the reference drying process) and the elastic modulus at t 0 + τ sh (i.e., somewhere in the middle of the actual drying process). The dependence of elastic modulus on age is then estimated using the adjusted ACI formula (E.29), E(t)=E 28 7t 28+6t (C.13) which leads to E(7+600) 7 607 E(t 0 + τ sh ) = 28+6(t 0 + τ sh ) 14 = 0.57514 + 3 28+6 607 7(t 0 + τ sh ) t 0 + τ sh (C.14) Recall that parameter k t is used in the second part of formula (C.9), which specifies the shrinkage halftime, τ sh. Coefficients α 1 and α 2 that appear in the formulae for the reference shrinkage strain εs in line 6 of Table C.3 are defined as 1.0 for type I cement α 1 = 0.85 for type II cement (C.15) 1.1 for type III cement 0.75 for steam curing 1.2 for sealed or normal curing in air with initial protection α 2 = (C.16) against drying 1.0 for curing in water or at 100% relative humidity If the specific information is not available, the following reasonable default values can be used: type I cement (α 1 = 1.0), curing in air with initial protection (α 2 = 1.2). The types of cement are understood here according to the American classification (ASTM C 150-07: Specification for Portland Cement). Type I is ordinary Portland cement, type II is modified cement, type III is rapid-hardening Portland cement, type IV is low-heat Portland cement, and type V is sulfate-resisting Portland cement.