Small-angle Thomson scattering of ultrafast laser pulses. for bright, sub-100-fs X-ray radiation

Similar documents
Intrinsic beam emittance of laser-accelerated electrons measured by x-ray spectroscopic imaging

VARIABLE GAP UNDULATOR FOR KEV FREE ELECTRON LASER AT LINAC COHERENT LIGHT SOURCE

4 FEL Physics. Technical Synopsis

Femtosecond and sub-femtosecond x-ray pulses from a SASE-based free-electron laser. Abstract

Brightness and Coherence of Synchrotron Radiation and Free Electron Lasers. Zhirong Huang SLAC, Stanford University May 13, 2013

Introduction to electron and photon beam physics. Zhirong Huang SLAC and Stanford University

X-ray Free-electron Lasers

Beam manipulation with high energy laser in accelerator-based light sources

SLAC Summer School on Electron and Photon Beams. Tor Raubenheimer Lecture #2: Inverse Compton and FEL s

Performance Metrics of Future Light Sources. Robert Hettel, SLAC ICFA FLS 2010 March 1, 2010

Set-up for ultrafast time-resolved x-ray diffraction using a femtosecond laser-plasma kev x-ray-source

Two-Stage Chirped-Beam SASE-FEL for High Power Femtosecond X-Ray Pulse Generation

Analysis of Slice Transverse Emittance Evolution in a Photocathode RF Gun. Abstract

Generating ultrashort coherent soft x-ray radiation in storage rings using angular-modulated electron beams. Abstract

Linac Based Photon Sources: XFELS. Coherence Properties. J. B. Hastings. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

NON LINEAR PULSE EVOLUTION IN SEEDED AND CASCADED FELS

ATTOSECOND X-RAY PULSES IN THE LCLS USING THE SLOTTED FOIL METHOD

Pushing the limits of laser synchrotron light sources

Flexible control of femtosecond pulse duration and separation using an emittance-spoiling foil in x-ray free-electron lasers

Free-electron laser SACLA and its basic. Yuji Otake, on behalf of the members of XFEL R&D division RIKEN SPring-8 Center

LASER-COMPTON SCATTERING AS A POTENTIAL BRIGHT X-RAY SOURCE

Excitements and Challenges for Future Light Sources Based on X-Ray FELs

Recent developments in the Dutch Laser Wakefield Accelerators program at the University of Twente: New external bunch injection scheme.

An Adventure in Marrying Laser Arts and Accelerator Technologies

OPERATING OF SXFEL IN A SINGLE STAGE HIGH GAIN HARMONIC GENERATION SCHEME

PIC simulations of laser interactions with solid targets

START-TO-END SIMULATIONS FOR IR/THZ UNDULATOR RADIATION AT PITZ

Expected properties of the radiation from VUV-FEL / femtosecond mode of operation / E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov

Coherent X-Ray Sources: Synchrotron, ERL, XFEL

Γ f Σ z Z R

Fast proton bunch generation in the interaction of ultraintense laser pulses with high-density plasmas

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE*

Electron Linear Accelerators & Free-Electron Lasers

LCLS-II SCRF start-to-end simulations and global optimization as of September Abstract

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

Beam manipulation with high energy laser in accelerator-based light sources

An Overview of the Activities of ICS Sources in China

Diagnostic Systems for Characterizing Electron Sources at the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY, Zeuthen site

Experimental Optimization of Electron Beams for Generating THz CTR and CDR with PITZ

SPARCLAB. Source For Plasma Accelerators and Radiation Compton. On behalf of SPARCLAB collaboration

Excitements and Challenges for Future Light Sources Based on X-Ray FELs

Optical Circular Deflector with Attosecond Resolution for Ultrashort Electron. Abstract

Emittance Limitation of a Conditioned Beam in a Strong Focusing FEL Undulator. Abstract

Generating intense attosecond x-ray pulses using ultraviolet-laser-induced microbunching in electron beams. Abstract

Generation and characterization of ultra-short electron and x-ray x pulses

Femto-second FEL Generation with Very Low Charge at LCLS

Opportunities and Challenges for X

Longitudinal Measurements at the SLAC Gun Test Facility*

Use of Crab Cavities for Short X-ray Pulse Production in Rings

ASTRA simulations of the slice longitudinal momentum spread along the beamline for PITZ

SPPS: The SLAC Linac Bunch Compressor and Its Relevance to LCLS

Research with Synchrotron Radiation. Part I

Greenfield FELs. John Galayda, SLAC Kwang-Je Kim, ANL (Presenter) James Murphy, BNL

Simulations of the IR/THz source at PITZ (SASE FEL and CTR)

OPTIMIZING RF LINACS AS DRIVERS FOR INVERSE COMPTON SOURCES: THE ELI-NP CASE

Accelerator Physics Issues of ERL Prototype

Linac Driven Free Electron Lasers (III)

Simulations of the IR/THz Options at PITZ (High-gain FEL and CTR)

Construction of a 100-TW laser and its applications in EUV laser, wakefield accelerator, and nonlinear optics

SPARCLAB. Source For Plasma Accelerators and Radiation Compton with Laser And Beam

Investigation of the Feasibility of a Free Electron Laser for the Cornell Electron Storage Ring and Linear Accelerator

Femtosecond Width X-ray Generation with the SLAC Linac and the FFTB Beamline *

New Electron Source for Energy Recovery Linacs

MaRIE. MaRIE X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Pre-Conceptual Design

Short Pulse, Low charge Operation of the LCLS. Josef Frisch for the LCLS Commissioning Team

FEL SIMULATION AND PERFORMANCE STUDIES FOR LCLS-II

LCLS Accelerator Parameters and Tolerances for Low Charge Operations

Nonlinear Optics (WiSe 2015/16) Lecture 12: January 15, 2016

The Linac Coherent Light Source II (LCLS II) at SLAC

X-Band RF Harmonic Compensation for Linear Bunch Compression in the LCLS

Dark Current at Injector. Jang-Hui Han 27 November 2006 XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting

Low slice emittance preservation during bunch compression

M o n o e n e r g e t i c A c c e l e r a t i o n o f E l e c t r o n s b y L a s e r - D r i v e n P l a s m a W a v e

Toward a high quality MeV electron source from a wakefield accelerator for ultrafast electron diffraction

CONCEPTUAL STUDY OF A SELF-SEEDING SCHEME AT FLASH2

FREE-ELECTRON LASER FACILITY(U) NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS GAITHERSBURG NO P H DEBENHdAN ET AL UNCLASSIFIED F/G 14/2 NI

Enhancement of Betatron radiation from laser-driven Ar clustering gas

PAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL

Laser-Electron Storage Ring Zhirong Huang and Ronald D. Ruth Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (October 16,

Emittance and Quantum Efficiency Measurements from a 1.6 cell S- Band Photocathode RF Gun with Mg Cathode *

Short Wavelength SASE FELs: Experiments vs. Theory. Jörg Rossbach University of Hamburg & DESY

Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) Properties. Physics Dept. & Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS) Ithaca, NY Cornell University

Femto second X ray Pulse Generation by Electron Beam Slicing. F. Willeke, L.H. Yu, NSLSII, BNL, Upton, NY 11973, USA

Trends in X-ray Synchrotron Radiation Research

Coherence properties of the radiation from SASE FEL

Vertical Polarization Option for LCLS-II. Abstract

Laser-driven intense X-rays : Studies at RRCAT

Introduction to intense laser-matter interaction

Using IMPACT T to perform an optimization of a DC gun system Including merger

What limits the gap in a flat dechirper for an X-ray FEL?

Femtosecond X-ray Pulse Temporal Characterization in Free-Electron Lasers Using a Transverse Deflector. Abstract

UV laser pulse temporal profile requirements for the LCLS injector - Part I - Fourier Transform limit for a temporal zero slope flattop

Transverse emittance measurements on an S-band photocathode rf electron gun * Abstract

A Possible Experiment at LEUTL to Characterize Surface Roughness Wakefield Effects

Linac optimisation for the New Light Source

X-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs. Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012

Ultrashort electron source from laser-plasma interaction

Beam halo formation in high-intensity beams

Results of the Energy Doubler Experiment at SLAC

Time resolved transverse and longitudinal phase space measurements at the high brightness photo injector PITZ

Transcription:

Small-angle Thomson scattering of ultrafast laser pulses for bright, sub-100-fs X-ray radiation Yuelin Li, Zhirong Huang, Michael D. Borland and Stephen Milton Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 Abstract We propose a scheme for bright sub-100-femtosecond X-ray radiation generation using smallangle Thomson scattering. Coupling high-brightness electron bunches with high-power ultrafast laser pulses, radiation with photon energies between 8- to 40-keV can be generated with pulse duration comparable to that of the incoming laser pulse with peak spectral brightness close to those of the third-generation synchrotron light sources of ~10 20 photons s -1 mm -2 mrad -2 per 10-3 bandwidth. PACS numbers: 52.38.Ph, 52.59.Px, 41.60.Ap, 41.75.Ht, 42.65.Re, 13.60.Fz, 61.10.-i

I. INTRODUCTION Understanding structural dynamics in physics, chemistry, and biological science at the fundamental time scale of atomic motion (below ~100 fs) needs ultrafast probes like ultrashort X-ray pulses and electron bunches. Currently, although there are several ways one can generate subpicosecond X-ray pulses, including laser-excited plasma radiation [1], bunch-sliced synchrotron radiation [2], and right-angle Thomson scattering [2], to generate true femtosecond X-ray pulses (<100 fs) with appreciable brightness remains a challenge. The main obstacle is the physical size of the radiator, which dominates the pulse duration broadening. Even the future X- ray free-electron lasers [3] suffer from the same limitation, and the pulse duration is limited to about 200 fs. In this paper, we propose to use small-angle Thomson scattering (SATS) to generate bright kev radiation with a pulse duration well below 100 fs. In this scheme, the useful longitudinal size of the radiation volume is limited to that comparable to the laser pulse duration, hence the pulse length of the X-ray is largely freed from the physical size of the electron bunch and can be as short as the laser pulse. Meanwhile, for routinely achievable electron quality from modern photocathode guns and the chirped-pulse-amplification ultrafast laser systems, peak spectral brightness comparable to those of the third-generation synchrotron light sources can be achieved. In comparison with other proposals of generating short X-ray pulses in these proceedings, the distinct advantage is its capability of generating X-ray pulses as short as a few fs with no compromise on the peak spectral brightness, hence is well suited for ultrafast dynamic studies. II. SMALL-ANGLE THOMSON SCATTERING 2

For Thomson scattering, with the scattering angle θ <<1 and the relativistic factor of the electron bunch γ >>1, the energy of the scattered photon is 2 2γ E E L (1 cosφ), (1) 2 2 1+ γ θ and the differential scattering cross section (after integration over the azimuthal angle) is dσ 8π dθ 2 r e 4 4 2 1+ γ θ γ θ. (2) 2 2 4 (1 + γ θ ) Here Ε L is the energy of the incident photon, φ and θ are, respectively, the angles of the incident and scattered photons with respect to the electron propagation direction, and r e is the classical electron radius. When φ << 1 at θ = 0, we have φ = (Ε /Ε L ) 1/2 /γ. 2.1 Pulse duration Note that, from Eq. (1), one can obtain the same energy for the scattered photons by different combinations of the electron bunch energy and the incidence angle of the incoming photons. An interesting scenario is created when one increases the electron beam energy while reducing the laser incidence angle. In this case the slippage between the incoming laser pulse and the scattered photons can be significantly reduced, thus limiting the longitudinal size of the emitter. This is very favorable for short-pulse X-ray generation. Furthermore, a smaller divergence is expected for the scattered photons at higher electron energies from Eq. (2), which shows the divergence of the scattered photons is approximately 1/γ as a result of the Lorentz contraction effect. Consider a Gaussian electron bunch with σ x, y, z RMS bunch sizes propagating along the z axis and interacting with a Gaussian laser pulse propagating in the x-z plane. The laser has an RMS pulse duration of cτ L < σ z, and the beams are matched in the vertical direction so that the 3

laser beam waist w 0 =2σ y. The pulse duration of the scattered photon burst is the convolution of three factors: the laser pulse length τ L, the lag between the scattered and the incident photons (1- cosφ)t c σ x φ/2c, and the projection of the transverse laser beam size along the z axis, which is (1- cosφ)t c σ y sinφ /c σ y φ/2c. Here t c σ x /csinφ=σ x /cφ is the time needed for the laser pulse to cross the electron bunch (we assume σ x σ y ), and t c σ y cosφ/csinφ. Hence the pulse duration of the scattered photons is, τ τ 1/ 2 2 2 σ x + σ y 2 1 + 1+ L φ 2 2. (3) 4τ Lc Here w 0 =2σ y is used. Equation (3) reveals the most important characteristics of the small-angle Thomson scattering scheme, i.e., its capability to generate an X-ray burst with pulse duration comparable to that of the incident laser, which occurs with reasonably focused electron bunches for small enough laser incidence angle. Under this condition, the laser and electron beam sizes play no role in determining the pulse duration, and the short pulse length of the scattered radiation is the result of a sliced Thomson scattering in which only those electrons underlying the laser pulse are scattering the laser photons, and the scattered photons are physically locked with respect to the laser pulse. The result is depicted in Fig. 1 (a), where the numerically calculated X-ray pulse duration generated by scattering a FWHM 20-fs (RMS duration of 8.5 fs) laser pulse off a 0.2-ps electron bunch is plotted as a function of the electron bunch transverse sizes and energies. The calculation is performed by numerically integrating the distribution function (assumed to be Gaussian) of the electron bunch and the laser pulse coupled by Eqs. (1, 2). The laser wavelength is at 800 nm (1.55 ev), and the peak of the angle-integrated X-ray spectra is kept at 8 kev by adjusting the laser incidence angle over the range from 380 to 19 mrad. Clearly, X-ray pulse duration down to 4

20 to 30 fs can be achieved, a regime so far only available at visible to VUV wavelengths. In the calculation, a conservative normalized electron beam emittance of 10-5 m rad is used, which is a factor of 2-3 larger than that produced from modern photocathode guns. Although in the numerical examples throughout this paper we use an FWHM laser pulse duration of 20 fs, the SATS scheme can work with lasers having much shorter pulse duration to generate even shorter X-ray pulses. The condition for relaying the laser pulse duration to the X- ray radiation within a relative broadening factor of η=τ/τ L -1 can be derived from Eq. (3), which determines the maximum electron bunch transverse size (for a round electron bunch) σ 1/ 2 EL x, y 2η max γcτ L. (3a) E Here φ = (Ε /Ε L ) 1/2 /γ is used. As an example, for a γ=1300, E=8 kev and E L =1.55 ev (800 nm radiation), to maintain the pulse duration of the laser within an error of η=20%, the beam size needed is approximately 16 times the laser pulse length. Even for a 5-fs FWHM pulse duration, this gives a 24-µm FWHM transverse bunch size, a moderate number for high quality, well focused electron beams. The same longitudinal or transverse beam size would generate 80-fs pulses in regular Thomson scattering and synchrotron radiation schemes. 2.2 Photon production and spectra However, there are two disadvantages associated with small laser incidence angles. The apparent one is that the number of the scattered photons can be significantly reduced. This is due to the fact that the effective laser flux seen by the electrons becomes smaller. In the laboratory frame, the electrons (propagating at ~c) see the photons propagating at a speed of c(1- cosφ)=cφ 2 /2 along the z axis, which is the only useful component of the photon flux (the 5

transverse scattering cross section is collapsed by Lorentz contraction effect). Considering that the interacting electrons are those underlying the laser pulse and the interaction time is t c, using simple geometrical considerations, the total number of scattered photons is calculated as Σ N N 0 e p n φ. (4) 4π σ σ y z Here N e,p are numbers of electrons and photons, Σ 0 is the integrated scattering cross section over the acceptance angle (when integrated over all angles, it is the Thomson scattering cross section). The second disadvantage is that the full bandwidth becomes larger as the incidence angle becomes smaller. To understand this, we first calculate the bandwidth at a particular scattering angle, which can be obtained by differentiating Eq. (1) using Gaussian energy and angular distributions for the laser electron bunches, 2 2 2 E + σ + x σ y 2 E 1/ 2 σ φ 2 2 + 4σ + e σ L. (5) φ Here σ x,y are the electron beam divergence, σ e is the electron bunch energy spread, σ φ =λ L /4πσ y and σ L =λ L /4πcτ L are the diffraction-limited divergence and the transform-limited bandwidth of the laser pulse. To obtain the angle-integrated bandwidth, one needs to numerically convolve Eq. (5) with Eqs. (1, 2), and, at incident angles comparable to or smaller than the laser divergence, spectrum broadening due to laser divergence dominates, E E int σ φ = 2 = φ λl. (5a) 2πσ φ y The spectrum broadening is illustrated in Fig. 1 (b), where the numerically calculated FWHM bandwidth of the angle-integrated spectra as a function of the beam energy and transverse beam size is given. The bandwidth changes from below 30% for low beam energies 6

and large transverse sizes, to ~ 200% at high beam energies with small transverse beam sizes, in agreement with Eq. (5a). Summarizing Eqs. (3-5), the average photon flux can be estimated as F Σ N N 0 p e δ BW 1 f, (6) 2 4π σ λ γ z here δ BW is the required bandwidth for the experiment, λ is the wavelength of the scattered photons, and f is the repetition rate. We used φ=(e/e L ) 1/2 /γ =(λ L /λ) 1/2 /γ for obtaining Eq. (6). From Eq. (6), it is clear that the photon flux decreases rapidly as the electron bunch becomes more energetic. The numerically calculated photon flux is given in Fig. 2 (a) for the same condition as in Fig. 1 except that a 2-J per pulse laser energy at 6 Hz is used. Note that the bandwidth of the angle-integrated spectrum is used. Obviously, for more efficient scattering or higher photon flux, larger laser incidence angles are more desirable. From Eq. (3a), for a fixed bunch size with a relative broadening factor of η=τ/τ L -1, the minimum electron bunch energy (corresponding to the maximum laser incidence angle) that maximizes the photon flux is, 1/ 2 σ x, y E min. 2 γ (7) cτ L ηel As an example, for a laser FWHM pulse length of 20 fs and electron bunch size of 11 mm RMS, γ min =348, or 180 MeV of beam energy. This would increase the photon flux by more than a factor of 10 when compared with the case when γ=1270 (650-MeV beam energy). 2.3 Divergence and peak spectral brightness 7

Interestingly, for low-emittance electron bunches, even with fewer scattered photons and broader spectra, we find that the spectral brightness (defined as photon flux per unit solid angle and area) of the X-ray burst does not necessarily degrade at small laser incidence angles, making the SATS source also very useful for experiments that need a high spectral brightness. This is due to the fact that higher beam energy enhances the Lorentz contraction effect and further collapses the divergence of the scattered photons. To understand this, we can write the divergence of the scattered photons as ϕ x,y ~ (1/γ 2 +σ 2 x,y ) 1/2, which is a convolution of the Lorentz contraction effect determined by Eq. (2) as 1/γ and the divergence of the electron bunches σ x,y. For highquality, low-emittance electron bunches, the bunch divergence can be much smaller in most of the cases considered in this paper, hence the divergence of the scattered photons can be approximated by 1/γ 2, which decreases rapidly as electron beam energy increases. It should also be noted that, in a linac, the bunch divergence also decreases as the beam energy increases due to the scaling of the geometrical emittance with the beam energy ε=ε 0 /γ. This reduction of the divergence roughly compensates the reduced photon production and the broadened spectrum at smaller laser incidence angle. In addition, in a linac, the abovementioned geometrical emittance will make the bunch much easier to focus for higher scattering efficiency and spectral brightness. To summarize, the achievable peak spectral brightness of the scattered photons can be estimated as 2Σ N p N 0 e δ BW, (8) 16π σ σ σ τ λ B 3 x y z L Equation (8) is valid when 1/γ > σ x,y. It should also be mentioned that, due to the scattering geometry, the source sizes in the x and y axes are calculated differently. In the y direction, it is determined by overlapping two Gaussian profiles with the same width; hence the 8

profile is narrowed and is σ y / 2. In the x dimension, the laser pulse scans the electron bunch; hence the bunch size determines the source size, which is ~σ x. The numerically calculated peak spectral brightness is given in Fig. 2 (b). One sees that there is clearly an optimal beam energy that maximizes the spectral brightness, which occurs when 1/γ < σ x,y and the laser divergence 2σ φ /φ starts to dominate the angle-integrated bandwidth ( E/E) int. III. DISCUSSION 3.1 High peak brightness Figure 2 also clearly illustrates the importance of the phase-space density of the electron bunch for high brightness as shown in Eqs. (6, 8). Generally, the denser the bunch in the phase space, the higher the brightness, thus highlighting the importance of using a linear accelerator for this application. In comparison with a circular accelerator, such as a synchrotron, a linear accelerator has two major advantages. The first is that it is a one-pass machine, making it possible to preserve the low emittance of electron bunches generated using modern photocathode guns. The second is the freedom of using bunch compressors to shorten the bunch length to well below 1 ps. At the Advanced Photon Source (APS) injector linac [4, 5], for example, normalized RMS emittance smaller than 10-5 m rad and RMS bunch length of ~0.2 ps have been routinely achieved. With an energy spread of 0.1%, particle-tracking simulation shows it is possible to achieve an 11-µm transverse beam size at 650 MeV with modest effort. The results in Fig. 2 actually show the projected performance achievable using the APS linac with electron bunch charge of 1 nc. (Note that, to achieve the above-mentioned emittance 9

and bunch length may be a challenge.) With a laser energy of 2 J and a pulse duration of 20 fs [6], the peak brightness obtainable is about 10 20 photons s -1 mm -2 mrad -2 per 0.1% BW at 8 kev with the beam parameters described above at 650 MeV beam energy (γ ~ 1300). This is a flux of ~10 5 photons per second per 0.1% bandwidth in a duration of 20 fs and a cone of 3 mrad. The peak brightness is close to those of the third-generation synchrotron light sources. 3.2 Tunability By adjusting the laser incidence angle, the peak of the X-ray spectra can be adjusted up to 40 kev with no significant changes in the properties of the scattered photons, as shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3 (a), the spectra with peak photon energy from 8 to 40 kev are given, and Fig. 3 (b) gives the pulse duration and peak spectral brightness as a function of the spectrum peak position. Clearly, the duration is almost constant at 20 fs, although the spectrum peak shifts from 8 to 40 kev. The only observed change is the increase in the peak spectral brightness when the spectrum shifts to higher peak photon energy due to the larger laser incidence angle. 3.3 Ponderomotive scattering With the laser intensity used in this paper, it is necessary to consider the possible ponderomotive scattering of the electrons from the laser field, which might deflect the electrons from the laser focus before they can scatter the photons. The ponderomotive force [7] of the laser field, using the laser strength parameter, can be written as, H dp dt mc γ 2 H 2 a, (9) 10

where a=10-9 I 1/2 λ L is the laser strength parameter with I the laser intensity in W/cm 2 and λ L in µm; p H is the electron momentum. In our case, with the laser focus size of σ x, we have a 2 a 2 /σ x and an interaction time of t c σ x /cφ, the maximum change in the transverse momentum can thus be approximated as δp -mca 2 /γφ, therefore the relative change of the transverse momentum is δp /p -(a/γφ) 2. In the examples in this paper, with the tightest focus of 11 µm, the focused laser intensity is of the order of 6.6 10 19, and the laser strength parameter is a=5.6. For 650-MeV electron bunches and 8-keV X-ray photons, the laser incidence angle is φ=60 mrad, and we have δp /p 0.5%, which is negligibly small. The same argument is applicable to the change in the longitudinal momentum, and we obtain δp // /p // -(a/γ) 2 (σ x /cτ L φ), which again is very small for the range of γ we are interested in. Clearly, the ponderomotive scattering effect is negligible in the regime of interest. IV. CONCLUSION AND ACKNOWLEGEMENT Our calculation is summarized in Table I, which also lists the performance of other subpicosecond kev X-ray sources, namely the right-angle Thomson scattering and the bunch-sliced synchrotron radiation [2], and that of laser plasma sources [1]. SATS stands out because of two distinctive characteristics: short pulse duration of well below 100 fs and higher peak spectral brightness beyond 10 20 photons s -2 mm 2 mrad -2 per 0.1% bandwidth. Together with the intrinsic synchronization to the laser pulse, it has the potential to become a very useful tool to push the frontier of ultrafast dynamics studies into the sub-100-fs atomic scale in pump probe experiments. In summary, we propose to use small-angle Thomson scattering for sub-100-fs kev X- ray pulse generation. As an example, we show that, by using the high-quality electron bunches in 11

the APS injection linac, 8- to 40-keV x-ray sources can be generated with a peak spectral brightness of 10 20 photons s -1 mm 2 mrad -2 per 0.1% bandwidth and with pulse durations of ~20 fs. The technique can also be used for sub-10 fs X-ray pulse generation. The scheme can be optimized either for higher photon flux or for higher spectral brightness by changing the laser incidence angle and the electron bunch energy to fit the experiment s requirement. The authors thank B. Hafizi for useful discussion of the effect of the ponderomotive scattering. This work is supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38. 12

References 1. A. Rousse C. Rischel and J.-C. Gauthier, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 17 (2001), and references therein. 2. R. W. Schoenlein, S. Chattopadhyay, H. H. W. Chong, T. E. Glover, P. A. Heimann, W. P. Leemans, C. V. Shank, A. A. Zholents, and M. S. Zolotorev, Appl. Phys. B 71, 1 (2000). 3. Linac Coherent Light Source Design Study Report, SLAC-R-521, UC-414, 1998. 4. G. Travish, S. Biedron, M. Borland, M. Hahne, K. Harkay, J. Lewellen, A. Lumpkin, S. Milton, and N. Sereno, Proc. 2000 Linear Accelerator Conference, Monterey, CA, pp. 899-901 (2000). 5. M. Borland, J. Lewellen, and S. Milton, Proc. 2000 Linear Accelerator Conference, Monterey, CA, pp. 899-901 (2000). 6. K. Yamakawa, M. Aoyama, S. Matsuoka, T. Kase, Y. Akahane, and H. Takuma, Opt. Lett. 23, 1468-1470 (1998), and references therein. 7. B. Quesnel and P. Mora, Phys. Rev. E 58, 3719 (1998). 13

Figure captions Figure 1 Contour plots of (a) X-ray pulse FWHM duration in femtoseconds, and (b) angleintegrated X-ray FWHM bandwidth ( E/E) int as a function of transverse bunch size and energy with an RMS bunch length of 0.212 ps and a normalized emittance of 10-5 m rad. The laser is a 20-fs Ti: sapphire system at 800 nm. The X-ray spectra peak at 8 kev. Figure 2 Contour plots of (a) the average photon flux (photons s -1 per 0.1% bandwidth), and (b) the spectral brightness (photons s -1 mm 2 mrad -2 per 0.1% bandwidth) as a function of transverse bunch size and beam energy. The RMS bunch length is 0.212 ps, and the normalized emittance is 10-5 m rad. The laser is a 20-fs, 2-J Ti: sapphire system at 800 nm at 6 Hz. The X-ray spectra peak at 8 kev. A repetition rate of 6 Hz is used when calculating the average photon flux. Figure 3 (a) Spectra with peak positions at 8 to 40 kev, and (b) peak brightness (dotted line) and pulse duration (solid line) as a function of the spectrum peak position. The bunch energy is 650 MeV with RMS bunch length of 0.212 ps, and the normalized emittance is 10-5 m rad. The laser is a 20-fs, 2-J, Ti: sapphire system at 800 nm. Shifting the spectrum peak is accomplished by changing the laser incidence angle. 14

Table I. Summary of the proposed APS SATS X-ray source Wavelength (Å) Repetition rate (Hz) Pulse length (fs) Average photon flux e Divergence (mrad) Bandwidth Peak brightness f APS Linac a ALS 90 TS b ALS Slicing c Laser Plasma d 1.5-0.3 0.4 6 1-10 6 100 10 5 10 20 300 ~100 ~300 10 6 10 5 10 7 10 9 3 10 0.6 π rad 67% 80% <0.1% ~10 20 3 10 15 ~10 19 ~10 18 a. Operating with a 6-Hz, 20-fs, 2-J, 800-nm laser at 650 MeV beam energy b. Ref. 2, perspective value c. Ref. 2, perspective value d. Ref. 1, experimental data e. In photons s -1 per 0.1% bandwidth f. In photons s -1 mm 2 mrad -2 per 0.1% BW 15

γ 3200 2200 (a) 25 fs 30 fs 40 fs 50 fs 70 fs 100 fs 1200 γ 200 3200 2200 (b) 30.0% 40.4% 60.0% 100% 160% 180% 1200 200 50 100 150 200 σ x, σ y (µm) Figure 1 Contour plots of (a) X-ray pulse FWHM duration in femtoseconds, and (b) angleintegrated X-ray FWHM bandwidth ( E/E) int as a function of transverse bunch size and energy with an RMS bunch length of 0.212 ps and a normalized emittance of 10-5 m rad. The laser is a 20-fs Ti: sapphire system at 800 nm. The X-ray spectra peak at 8 kev. 16

γ 3200 2200 (a) 3E3 8E3 2E4 5E4 1E5 3E5 1200 200 γ 3200 2200 (b) 1E17 3E17 1E18 3E18 1E19 3E19 1E20 1200 200 50 100 150 200 σ x, σ y (µm) Figure 2 Contour plots of (a) the average photon flux (photons s -1 per 0.1% bandwidth), and (b) the spectral brightness (photons s -1 mm 2 mrad -2 per 0.1% bandwidth) as a function of transverse bunch size and beam energy. The RMS bunch length is 0.212 ps, and the normalized emittance is 10-5 m rad. The laser is a 20-fs, 2-J Ti: sapphire system at 800 nm at 6 Hz. The X-ray spectra peak at 8 kev. A repetition rate of 6 Hz is used when calculating the average photon flux. 17

Peak brightness (10 20 ph s -1 mrad -2 mm -2 0.1% BW) 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 (a) 8 kev (b) 16 kev 32 kev 24 kev Photon Energy (kev) 40 kev Brightness Duration 25 20 15 10 5 FWHM Duration (fs) 0.0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Spectral peak energy (kev) 0 Figure 3 (a) Spectra with peak positions at 8 to 40 kev, and (b) peak brightness (dotted line) and pulse duration (solid line) as a function of the spectrum peak position. The bunch energy is 650 MeV with RMS bunch length of 0.212 ps, and the normalized emittance is 10-5 m rad. The laser is a 20-fs, 2-J, Ti: sapphire system at 800 nm. Shifting the spectrum peak is accomplished by changing the laser incidence angle. 18