A proof of topological completeness for S4 in (0,1)

Similar documents
A proof of topological completeness for S4 in (0,1)

Propositional Logic of Continuous Transformations in Cantor Space

A NEW PROOF OF THE MCKINSEY-TARSKI THEOREM

Logics above S4 and the Lebesgue measure algebra

ON THE LOGIC OF CLOSURE ALGEBRA

Absolute Completeness of S4 u for Its Measure-Theoretic Semantics

Consequence Relations of Modal Logic

S4.3 AND HEREDITARILY EXTREMALLY DISCONNECTED SPACES. On the occasion of the one hundredth anniversary of the birth of George Chogoshvili.

Model Theory of Modal Logic Lecture 5. Valentin Goranko Technical University of Denmark

Logics for Bisimulation and Divergence

An Introduction to Modal Logic III

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.lo] 5 Mar 2007

MODAL LOGICS OF SPACE

Computational Logic and Applications KRAKÓW On density of truth of infinite logic. Zofia Kostrzycka University of Technology, Opole, Poland

Topological Perspective on the Hybrid Proof Rules

DENSELY k-separable COMPACTA ARE DENSELY SEPARABLE

Non-deterministic Semantics for Dynamic Topological Logic

MONADIC FRAGMENTS OF INTUITIONISTIC CONTROL LOGIC

First-order resolution for CTL

De Jongh s characterization of intuitionistic propositional calculus

A Note on Graded Modal Logic

A generalization of modal definability

On Modal Logics of Partial Recursive Functions

König s Lemma and Kleene Tree

Kruskal s Theorem Rebecca Robinson May 29, 2007

A Structure of KK-Algebras and its Properties

Neighborhood Semantics for Modal Logic Lecture 3

Discrete Mathematics

On Jankov-de Jongh formulas

Stat 8112 Lecture Notes Weak Convergence in Metric Spaces Charles J. Geyer January 23, Metric Spaces

Tableau-based decision procedures for the logics of subinterval structures over dense orderings

Smart labels. Marta Bilkova Evan Goris Joost J. Joosten November 24, 2004

A SEQUENT SYSTEM OF THE LOGIC R FOR ROSSER SENTENCES 2. Abstract

Neighborhood Semantics for Modal Logic Lecture 5

The logic of subset spaces, topologic and the local difference modality K

Logics for Compact Hausdorff Spaces via de Vries Duality

arxiv: v4 [math.lo] 6 Apr 2018

An Introduction to Modal Logic V

Completeness Results for Memory Logics

THE EQUATIONAL THEORIES OF REPRESENTABLE RESIDUATED SEMIGROUPS

Games for topological fixpoint logics

Completeness of S4 for the Lebesgue Measure Algebra

Uniquely Universal Sets

Stable formulas in intuitionistic logic

Topics in Subset Space Logic

Hypersequent Calculi for some Intermediate Logics with Bounded Kripke Models

Published in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Hybrid Logic 2007 (HyLo 2007)

Introduction to Neighborhood Semantics for. Modal Logic. ILLC, University of Amsterdam. January 7, 2007

TR : Binding Modalities

Abstract In this paper, we introduce the logic of a control action S4F and the logic of a continuous control action S4C on the state space of a dynami

Boolean bunched logic: its semantics and completeness

A product of γ-sets which is not Menger.

On Modal µ-calculus And Non-Well-Founded Set Theory

Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

Algebraic Canonicity in Non-Classical Logics

Madhavan Mukund Chennai Mathematical Institute

A Remark on Propositional Kripke Frames Sound for Intuitionistic Logic

Some Exponential Lower Bounds on Formula-size in Modal Logic

EXTENDED MEREOTOPOLOGY BASED ON SEQUENT ALGEBRAS: Mereotopological representation of Scott and Tarski consequence relations

Stat 451: Solutions to Assignment #1

Sequent calculi of quantum logic with strict implication

Graph Theory and Modal Logic

Modal logics and their semantics

Axiomatisation of Hybrid Logic

Vietoris bisimulations

On the Complexity of the Reflected Logic of Proofs

Filtrations and Basic Proof Theory Notes for Lecture 5

cse371/mat371 LOGIC Professor Anita Wasilewska Fall 2018

Towards a Denotational Semantics for Discrete-Event Systems

Languages, logics and automata

Definability in Boolean bunched logic

Model Theory of Modal Logic Lecture 1: A brief introduction to modal logic. Valentin Goranko Technical University of Denmark

PROPOSITIONAL MIXED LOGIC: ITS SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS

A tableau-based decision procedure for a branching-time interval temporal logic

CTL-RP: A Computational Tree Logic Resolution Prover

TR : Tableaux for the Logic of Proofs

The Muddy Children:A logic for public announcement

First-Order Modal Logic and the Barcan Formula

SMALL SUBSETS OF THE REALS AND TREE FORCING NOTIONS

Model Theory of Modal Logic Lecture 4. Valentin Goranko Technical University of Denmark

Kripke Semantics for Basic Sequent Systems

Abstract model theory for extensions of modal logic

Bisimulation for Neighbourhood Structures

Semi-simple Splicing Systems

Monodic fragments of first-order temporal logics

The Topology of Common Belief

Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University

The Mother of All Paradoxes

A Proof System for Separation Logic with Magic Wand

On Sequent Calculi for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic

A Bimodal Perspective on Possibility Semantics

Approximations of Modal Logic K

Appendix B Convex analysis

Computation Tree Logic (CTL)

Separating Variants of LEM, LPO, and MP

1 The Local-to-Global Lemma

Semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic

Optimal Tableaux for Right Propositional Neighborhood Logic over Linear Orders

Syntax and Semantics of Propositional Linear Temporal Logic

Monadic Second Order Logic and Automata on Infinite Words: Büchi s Theorem

Transcription:

A proof of topological completeness for S4 in (0,1) G. Mints, T. Zhang Stanford University ASL Winter Meeting Philadelphia December 2002 ASL Winter Meeting 1

Topological interpretation of S4 A topological model is an ordered pair M = X, V, here X is a topological space and V is a function assigning a subset of X to each propositional variable. The valuation V is extended to all S4 formulas as follos: V (α β) = V (α) V (β), V (α β) = V (α) V (β), V ( α) = X \ V (α), V ( α) = Int(V (α)). here Int is the interior operator. We say that α is valid in a topological model M and rite M = α if and only if V (α) = X. ASL Winter Meeting 2

Completeness results S4 is complete for R, R n, Cantor spaces, the real interval (0, 1) and in general any dense-in-itself separable metric space [1]. Several simplified proofs ere published later: The completeness of S4 for Cantor spaces [2]. The completeness of Int for (0, 1) [3] Chapter 9. The completeness of S4 for (0, 1) [4]. Hoever, the last to completeness proofs contain gaps. A ne proof presented here combines the ideas in [2], [3] and [4] and provides a further simplification. ASL Winter Meeting 3

The idea of the ne proof S4 is complete for finite rooted Kripke models: S4 α iff = α for all finite rooted Kripke structures. For each finite rooted Kripke model K, there is a continuous and open mapping from the standard topology on (0, 1) onto the corresponding Kripke space K. f : (0, 1) onto K is continuous and open. It follos that S4 is complete for the real interval (0, 1). ASL Winter Meeting 4

(0, 1) and a Cantor set Let B be the set of all infinite binary sequences b = b 1 b 2... (b i {0, 1}) except the identical 0 ω and the sequences ending ith a tail of 1 s, Define B 1 and B 2 by B 1 = { b B ( i)( j > i) b(j) = 0} and B 2 = B\B 1. A familiar one-to-one correspondence beteen B and the real interval (0, 1) is given by real( b) = b(i)2 i i=1 B(x) = the unique b B such that real( b) = x ASL Winter Meeting 5

(0, 1) and a Cantor set Λ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 ω 1 ω 0 ω 1 ω 0 0.5 1 Figure 1: The full infinite binary tree ASL Winter Meeting 6

Kripke frame and Kripke space A Kripke frame (for S4) is an ordered pair F = W, R here W is a non-empty set and R is a reflexive and transitive relation on W. The elements in W are called orlds. A Kripke frame is rooted if there exists a orld 0 such that any orld in W is an R-successor of 0. A Kripke space K is a topological space ith the carrier W and the base of open sets O = { W R } for all W. We identify a Kripke frame W, R ith a topological space K. ASL Winter Meeting 7

Unind K to cover B Label finite binary sequences b = b 1 b 2... b n, n 1 by orlds W as follos. W(Λ) = 0. Let b Σ be a node in B. Suppose b is already labeled by a orld (i.e., W( b) = ), hile none of its children has yet been labeled. Let, 1,..., m be all R-successors of. Then W( b0 i ) = for 0 < i 2m, W( b0 2i 1 1) = i for 0 < i m, W( b0 2i 1) = for 0 i < m. ASL Winter Meeting 8

Unind K to cover B In placing R-successors of at right branches b0 2i 1 1 (i > 0), e interleave ith each of its other successors. This is the main distinction from the construction in [4]. n 2 1 Figure 2: Uninding and labeling ASL Winter Meeting 9

Map (0, 1) onto K Let b n = b(1) b(2)... b(n). Define stabilization point by λ( b) = the least n 1 [ ( i, j n)rw( b i)w( b j) ]. Define selection point by ρ( max(1, n) if b = b(1) b(2)... b(n)10 ω B 1, b) = λ( b) if b B 2. ASL Winter Meeting 10

Map (0, 1) onto K Define a map π from (0, 1) onto K by π(x) = W(B(x) ρ(b(x))) for x (0, 1). Define the modulus of continuity δ: if b = b(1) b(2)... b(n)10 ω B 1, then δ( b) = max(1, n), and if b B 2, then δ( b) = µn[n > λ( b) & b(n) = 1 & b(n 1) = 0]. ASL Winter Meeting 11

Map (0, 1) onto K 0 1 0 ρ( b) 1 0 0 ω 1 ρ( b)=λ( b) 0 0 x y 1 Figure 3: Selection point b B 1 (left) or b B 2 (right) ASL Winter Meeting 12

Four Lemmas Lemma 0.1. For any x, y (0, 1), if y x < 2 (δ(x)+2), then Rπ(x)π(y). Lemma 0.2. For any x (0, 1), ɛ > 0, W ith Rπ(x), there exists y (0, 1) such that y x < ɛ and π(y) =. Lemma 0.3. Let X 1, X 2 be to topological spaces and f : X 1 X 2 a continuous and open map. Let V 2 be a valuation on X 2 and define V 1 (p) = f 1 (V 2 (p)) (1) ASL Winter Meeting 13

for every propositional variable p. Then for any S4-formula α. V 1 (α) = f 1 (V 2 (α)) ASL Winter Meeting 14

Four Lemmas Lemma 0.4. Let X 1, X 2 be to topological spaces and f : X 1 X 2 a continuous and open map. Let V 2 be a valuation for topological semantics on X 2 and define V 1 by the equation (1). Then for any S4-formula α, X 2, V 2 = α implies X 1, V 1 = α. Moreover, if f is onto, then X 2, V 2 = α iff X 1, V 1 = α. ASL Winter Meeting 15

The proof of Lemma 0.1 Let W 0 W be an open subset of the Kripke space K, i.e., W 0 is closed under R. For W 0, let x π 1 (), so π(x) =. The set O x = {y x y < 2 (δ(x)+2) } is open in (0, 1). By Lemma 0.1 π(o x ) W 0 and hence π is continuous. ASL Winter Meeting 16

The proof of Lemma 0.2 Let O x be the collection of sets O x,i = {y x y < 2 (i+δ(x)+2) }. x O x is a base of the standard topology on (0, 1). By Lemma 0.1 for any π(o x,i ) e have Rπ(x). By Lemma 0.2 for any ith Rπ(x), there exists y O x,i such that π(y) =, i.e., π(o x,i ). Hence π(o x,i ) = { W Rπ(x)}, hich is obviously closed under R, and so π(o x,i ) is open in K. ASL Winter Meeting 17

Proof of Lemma 0.3 The base case and induction steps for connectives,, are straightforard. No suppose that α = β. By induction hypothesis, V 1 (β) = f 1 (V 2 (β)). It follos from openness and continuity that So e have, Int(f 1 (V 2 (β))) = f 1 (Int(V 2 (β))). V 1 (α) = V 1 ( β) = Int(V 1 (β)) = Int(f 1 (V 2 (β))) = f 1 (Int(V 2 (β))) = f 1 (V 2 ( β)) = f 1 (V 2 (α)). ASL Winter Meeting 18

Proof of Lemma 0.4 Suppose that X 2, V 2 = α, i.e., V 2 (α) = X 2. By Lemma 0.3 V 1 (α) = f 1 (V 2 (α)), and so V 1 (α) = X 1 as required. Suppose that f is onto and X 1, V 1 = α, but X 2, V 2 = α, i.e., V 2 (α) X 2. Since f is onto and V 1 (α) = f 1 (V 2 (α)), e have V 1 (α) X 1, i.e., X 1, V 1 = α, a contradiction. ASL Winter Meeting 19

S4 is complete Let α be an non-theorem of S4. So there exists a finite rooted Kripke model K = X, V such that K = α. Let V be the valuation on (0, 1) such that for every propositional variable p. V (p) = π 1 (V (p)) By Lemma 0.4 V (β) = X if and only if V (β) = (0, 1) for any S4-formula β. In particular since V (α) X, e have V (α) (0, 1), i.e., S4 is refuted on (0, 1). It follos that S4 is complete for (0, 1). ASL Winter Meeting 20

Future orks The completeness of Dynamic Topological Logic (DTL). DTL is a S4-based trimodal logic (,, ) for dynamical topological systems X, T, here T is a continuous map on the topological space X. The action of T on X is represented by the temporal operator ( tomorro ) interpreted as a pre-image under T. Properties of an orbit of T is described using the operator ( forever in the future ). The completeness of S4C for R. S4C is a, -fragment of DTL. ASL Winter Meeting 21

REFERENCES References [1] J. C. C. McKinsey and Alfred Tarski. The algebra of topology. The Annals of Mathematics, 45(1):141 191, January 1944. [2] Grigori Mints. A completeness proof for propositional S4 in Cantor space. In Ea Orloska, editor, Logic at ork: Essays dedicated to the memory of Helena Rasioa, pages 79 88. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 1999. [3] Grigori Mints. A short introduction to intuitionistic logic. Kluer Academic-Plenum Publishers, Ne York, 2000. [4] Marco Aiello, Johan van Benthem, and Guram Bezhanishvili. Reasoning about space: the modal ay. Technical Report PP-2001-18, ILLC, Amsterdam, 2001. ASL Winter Meeting B-1