Supporting Information

Similar documents
Supplementary Information Intrinsic Localized Modes in Proteins

Supporting Information

NMR study of complexes between low molecular mass inhibitors and the West Nile virus NS2B-NS3 protease

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Sensitive NMR Approach for Determining the Binding Mode of Tightly Binding Ligand Molecules to Protein Targets

What makes a good graphene-binding peptide? Adsorption of amino acids and peptides at aqueous graphene interfaces: Electronic Supplementary

Structure and evolution of the spliceosomal peptidyl-prolyl cistrans isomerase Cwc27

Amino Acid Side Chain Induced Selectivity in the Hydrolysis of Peptides Catalyzed by a Zr(IV)-Substituted Wells-Dawson Type Polyoxometalate

Supporting information to: Time-resolved observation of protein allosteric communication. Sebastian Buchenberg, Florian Sittel and Gerhard Stock 1

Bacterial protease uses distinct thermodynamic signatures for substrate recognition

Secondary Structure. Bioch/BIMS 503 Lecture 2. Structure and Function of Proteins. Further Reading. Φ, Ψ angles alone determine protein structure

T H E J O U R N A L O F G E N E R A L P H Y S I O L O G Y. jgp

The underlying principles of allosteric regulation have been a

Supplementary Materials for

Packing of Secondary Structures

Model Mélange. Physical Models of Peptides and Proteins

Supporting Information

NMR Structure of the HWE Kinase Associated Response Regulator Sma0114 in Its Activated State

Supplemental Information for: Characterizing the Membrane-Bound State of Cytochrome P450 3A4: Structure, Depth of Insertion and Orientation

Nitrogenase MoFe protein from Clostridium pasteurianum at 1.08 Å resolution: comparison with the Azotobacter vinelandii MoFe protein

Biophysical Journal, Volume 96. Supporting Material

Exam I Answer Key: Summer 2006, Semester C

Physiochemical Properties of Residues

Supporting Information. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2009

Any protein that can be labelled by both procedures must be a transmembrane protein.

Affinity labels for studying enzyme active sites. Irreversible Enzyme Inhibition. Inhibition of serine protease with DFP

What binds to Hb in addition to O 2?

Oxygen Binding in Hemocyanin

Supporting information

Supplementary figure 1. Comparison of unbound ogm-csf and ogm-csf as captured in the GIF:GM-CSF complex. Alignment of two copies of unbound ovine

Electro-Mechanical Conductance Modulation of a Nanopore Using a Removable Gate

Viewing and Analyzing Proteins, Ligands and their Complexes 2

Ranjit P. Bahadur Assistant Professor Department of Biotechnology Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. 1 st November, 2013

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1

Structure Investigation of Fam20C, a Golgi Casein Kinase

B O C 4 H 2 O O. NOTE: The reaction proceeds with a carbonium ion stabilized on the C 1 of sugar A.

Protein structure. Protein structure. Amino acid residue. Cell communication channel. Bioinformatics Methods

Improving Protein Function Prediction with Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Dariya Glazer Russ Altman

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapy-JPET#172536

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES. Figure S1

Overview. The peptide bond. Page 1

Supplementary Information. Broad Spectrum Anti-Influenza Agents by Inhibiting Self- Association of Matrix Protein 1

7.012 Problem Set 1. i) What are two main differences between prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells?

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

HSQC spectra for three proteins

Supplementary Figure 3 a. Structural comparison between the two determined structures for the IL 23:MA12 complex. The overall RMSD between the two

Supplementary Figure S1. Urea-mediated buffering mechanism of H. pylori. Gastric urea is funneled to a cytoplasmic urease that is presumably attached

Supplement information

Problem Set 1

Structural and mechanistic insight into the substrate. binding from the conformational dynamics in apo. and substrate-bound DapE enzyme

Central Dogma. modifications genome transcriptome proteome

Supplementary Figure 1. Aligned sequences of yeast IDH1 (top) and IDH2 (bottom) with isocitrate

Supporting information for: Mechanism of lignin inhibition of enzymatic. biomass deconstruction

Programme Last week s quiz results + Summary Fold recognition Break Exercise: Modelling remote homologues

NB-DNJ/GCase-pH 7.4 NB-DNJ+/GCase-pH 7.4 NB-DNJ+/GCase-pH 4.5

A) at equilibrium B) endergonic C) endothermic D) exergonic E) exothermic.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Introduction solution NMR

Geometrical Concept-reduction in conformational space.and his Φ-ψ Map. G. N. Ramachandran

A conserved P-loop anchor limits the structural dynamics that mediate. nucleotide dissociation in EF-Tu.

- Basic understandings: - Mapping interactions:

Biomolecules: lecture 10

Computational Structural Biology and Molecular Simulation. Introduction to VMD Molecular Visualization and Analysis

Supplemental Data SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES

Supplementary information

Effects of Chemical Exchange on NMR Spectra

Exam III. Please read through each question carefully, and make sure you provide all of the requested information.

1. What is an ångstrom unit, and why is it used to describe molecular structures?

C CH 3 N C COOH. Write the structural formulas of all of the dipeptides that they could form with each other.

Sequential resonance assignments in (small) proteins: homonuclear method 2º structure determination

Protein Data Bank Contents Guide: Atomic Coordinate Entry Format Description. Version Document Published by the wwpdb

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. doi: /nature07461

Amino Acids and Proteins at ZnO-water Interfaces in Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Electronic Supplementary Information

Structurale, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Grenoble, France

Assessing the potential of atomistic molecular dynamics simulations to probe reversible. protein-protein recognition and binding

Where are the protons? Measuring and modelling proton equilibria in complex macromolecular systems.

Unraveling the degradation of artificial amide bonds in Nylon oligomer hydrolase: From induced-fit to acylation processes

DOCKING TUTORIAL. A. The docking Workflow

17. Biomolecular Interaction

Details of Protein Structure

Volume 12(2)

Using Higher Calculus to Study Biologically Important Molecules Julie C. Mitchell

CHEM J-9 June 2014

Computational Modeling of Protein Kinase A and Comparison with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES

Supporting Information

X-ray crystallography NMR Cryoelectron microscopy

Supplementary Materials for

Read more about Pauling and more scientists at: Profiles in Science, The National Library of Medicine, profiles.nlm.nih.gov

Protein Allostery and Conformational Dynamics

Housekeeping. Housekeeping. Molecules of Life: Biopolymers

Supporting Information. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2006

Major Types of Association of Proteins with Cell Membranes. From Alberts et al

Dental Biochemistry EXAM I

Table S1. Overview of used PDZK1 constructs and their binding affinities to peptides. Related to figure 1.

Guanosine oxidation explored by pulse radiolysis coupled with transient electrochemistry. Electronic Supplementary Information

Lecture 10 (10/4/17) Lecture 10 (10/4/17)

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

Electronic Supplementary Information

Lipid Regulated Intramolecular Conformational Dynamics of SNARE-Protein Ykt6

Transcription:

Supporting Information Allosteric communication disrupted by small molecule binding to the Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase protein-protein interface. Ivan Rivalta*,#, George P. Lisi #, Ning-Shiuan Snoeberger #, Gregory Manley #, J. Patrick Loria* #, and Victor S. Batista* # Univ Lyon, Ens de Lyon, CNRS, Université Lyon 1, Laboratoire de Chimie UMR 5182, F- 69342, Lyon, France. # Department of Chemistry and Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry Yale University, P.O. Box 208107, New Haven, CT 06520-8107, USA. Table of content Figure S1. Hydrophobic contacts at the bottom of the HisF barrel in the apo, PRFAR-bound binary and ternary complexes. Table S1. Average distances of hydrophobic contacts at the effector site. Figure S2. Relative positions of the fα2 and fα3 helices in the apo, PRFAR-bound binary and ternary complexes. Figure S3. The influence of the inhibitor binding on the ammonia gate. Figure S4. Chemical shift perturbations in the HisF domain of apo PRFAR-bound IGPS upon titration with 3. Figure S5. Representative correlation peaks from 1 H- 15 N HSQC NMR experiments of 15 N- labeled HisF-IGPS. Figure S6. Chemical shifts changes in apo IGPS induced by binding of 3. Table S2. 15 N Chemical shift perturbations of HisH residues upon titration of apo IGPS with 3 Figure S7. Representative correlation peaks from 1 H- 15 N HSQC NMR experiments of 15 N- labeled HisF-IGPS. Figure S8. Chemical shifts changes in PRFAR-bound IGPS induced by binding of 3. Figure S9. Breathing motion of the PRFAR-bound 3-IGPS ternary complexes. References 1

Figure S1. Hydrophobic contacts at the bottom of the HisF barrel in the apo, PRFARbound binary and ternary complexes. The distances (in Å) between amino acid residues with hydrophobic side chains, i.e. ff23, fv48, fl50 and fi52 (a), are monitored along the 0.1 µs MD simulations of the apo (blue), binary PRFAR-bound (red) and the ternary complexes (in black) with potential inhibitors 1-3 (b-d). Table S1. Average distances (in Å) between hydrophobic amino acid residues at the bottom of the HisF barrel in the apo, PRFAR-bound binary and ternary complexes. The hydrophobic contacts defining the measured distances (with Roman numerals) are defined in Figure S1. (I) fv48-fl50 (II) fl50-fi52 apo 5.02 6.97 PRFAR 6.58 5.02 1 4.84 7.40 2 5.24 6.47 3 5.86 5.45 (III) fi52-ff23 7.23 6.98 8.54 13.85 10.57 (IV) fl50-ff23 11.77 8.91 14.99 19.97 15.86 (II)+(III)+(IV) 25.79 20.91 30.93 40.29 31.88 2

Figure S2. Relative positions of the fα2 and fα3 helices in the apo, PRFAR-bound binary and ternary complexes. The charged amino acid residues in the fα2 and fα3 helices are involved in specific contacts (left panel) that induce different relative positions of the two helices in the apo and PRFAR-bound complexes, taking an active part in the IGPS allosteric mechanism. The relative positions of the two helices are monitored (right panels) in along the 0.1 µs MD simulations of the apo (blue), binary PRFAR-bound (red) and the ternary complexes (in black) with potential inhibitors 1-3. 3

Figure S3. The influence of the inhibitor binding on the ammonia gate. Residues fr5, fe46, fk99, and fe167 create salt bridges that serve as ammonia gate for the HisF (β/α)8 barrel that opens within 100 ns in the MD trajectory of the PRFAR-bound binary complex (A), as expected for an active IGPS conformation, due to interactions between fk99 and fd98 side chains. When the inhibitors 1-3 bind (B-D) the gate remain closed due to the altered dynamics of fd98 induced by the interfacial ligands. 4

A B Figure S4. Chemical shift perturbations in the HisF domain of (A) apo IGPS and (B) PRFAR-bound IGPS upon titration with 3. The red line represents the 10% trimmed mean of all shifts, and perturbations greater than this cutoff are deemed significant. 5

Figure S5. Representative correlation peaks from 1 H- 15 N HSQC NMR experiments of 15 N- labeled HisF-IGPS. Titration of 3 into apo IGPS (blue) to a concentration of 3.17 mm (orange) causes distinct shifts in several resonances (Gly30, Asp31, Glu71, etc), while others remain unchanged (Gly15, Ile93). Significant chemical shift differences (Δδ) are summarized in Figure S6. 6

Figure S6. Chemical shifts changes in apo IGPS induced by binding of 3. Titration of 3 into apo IGPS (blue) to a concentration of 3.17 mm (orange) causes distinct shifts in several resonances (listed in the left panel). Residues with Δδ>0.14 (orange balls at Cα), Δδ>0.10 (light green) and Δδ>0.08 (blue balls) are mapped onto the 3-IGPS structure. Chemical shifts are determined by 1 H- 15 N HSQC NMR experiments of 15 N-labeled HisF-IGPS. 7

Table S2. 15 N Chemical shift perturbations of HisH residues upon titration of apo IGPS with 3 (3.2 mm). Residues with Δδ >0.06 ppm were determined to be statistically significant from the 10% trimmed mean. Residue Δδ (ppm) Arg18 0.092 Ser24 0.077 Ile32 0.200 Phe54 0.051 Gly55 0.076 Leu66 0.061 Phe69 0.071 Glu92 0.140 Glu95 0.061 Thr155 0.065 Arg200 0.076 8

Figure S7. Representative correlation peaks from 1 H- 15 N HSQC NMR experiments of 15 N- labeled HisF-IGPS. Titration of PRFAR into apo IGPS to a concentration of 0.96 mm (red) causes distinct shifts in several resonances, and titration of 3 into the binary complex to a concentration of 9.2 mm (black) causes further perturbation. Significant chemical shift differences (Δδ) are summarized in Figure S8. 9

Figure S8. Chemical shifts changes in PRFAR-bound IGPS induced by binding of 3. Titration of 3 into binary IGPS (red) to a concentration of 9.2 mm (grey) causes distinct shifts in several resonances (listed in the left panel). Residues with Δδ>0.14 (grey balls), Δδ>0.10 (light blue) and Δδ>0.08 (pink balls) are mapped onto the 3-IGPS structure. Chemical shifts are determined by 1 H- 15 N HSQC NMR experiments of 15 N-labeled HisF of the binary IGPS complex, with PRFAR concentration of 0.96 mm. 10

Figure S9. Breathing motion of the PRFAR-bound 3-IGPS ternary complexes. The breathing motion is measured by the angle (ϕ) defined by the Cα of the ff120, hw123 and hg52 (see main text). The evolution of ϕ during the MD simulation time (0-2.5 µs) is reported. 11