C In other study groups large spark-chamber magnets have been 1 2 These magnets are to be used as triggered ''bubble chambers"

Similar documents
A STRONG INTERACTIONS IN THE 25-FT BUBBLE CHAMBER. G. Trilling Lawrence Radiation Laboratory

C A SPECTROMETER FOR MEASURING INELASTIC SECONDARIES FROM 200 GeV Ie, p-p COLLISIONS. T. O. White National Accelerator Laboratory

REPORT OF THE NEUTRINO AREA STUDY GROUP

A ON THE USE OF A HYBRID BUBBLE CHAMBER IN THE 100-BeV REGION. W. D. Walker University of Wisconsin ABSTRACT

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

?: 2 GeV from the CERN and Columbia-BNL

Particle Physics Homework Assignment 4

NEPTUN-A Spectrometer for measuring the Spin Analyzing Power in p-p elastic scattering at large P~ at 400 GeV (and 3 TeV) at UNK.

Case Study: Analyzing Elementary Particle Trajectories

PHYSICS 252 EXPERIMENT NO. 11 THE DYNAMICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES

Dedicated Arrays: MEDEA GDR studies (E γ = MeV) Highly excited CN E*~ MeV, 4 T 8 MeV

J. Sandweiss Yale University

A beam line for schools

BUBBLE CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS. December Technical Report Prepared Under Contract AT(O4-3)-515 for the USAEC San Francisco Operations Office

Analysis of a bubble chamber picture

Concepts of Event Reconstruction

2.24 Simulation Study of K L Beam: K L Rates and Background Ilya Larin Department of Physics Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529, U.S.A.

MESON AREA 1000 GeV STUDY. C. N. Brown, A. L. Read, A. A. Wehmann Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

Discovery of muon neutrino

Search for a Z at an e + e - Collider Thomas Walker

The Development of Particle Physics. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev E45, Tel.:

Analysis of a bubble chamber picture

Theory English (Official)

Latest Results from the OPERA Experiment (and new Charge Reconstruction)

Nuclear Physics Fundamental and Application Prof. H. C. Verma Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

x + P - n + (anything), (1 )

EP228 Particle Physics

Particle Detectors. How to See the Invisible

The discovery of the antiproton and other antimatter,

Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

(Total for Question = 5 marks) PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com

Particle Physics with Electronic Detectors

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker

High-t Meson Photoproduction: Experimental Capabilities

A brief history of accelerators, detectors and experiments: (See Chapter 14 and Appendix H in Rolnick.)

σ ε ω 1 /σ ω ε α=ω 2 /ω 1

A COMPARISON OF THE SHAPES OF "+p AND pp DIFFRACTION PEAKS FROM 50 TO 175 GEV/C* Fermilab Single Arm Spectrometer Group+ ABSTRACT

Differential Cross Section Measurements in Ion-molecule Collisions

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Sep 2009

Status of GEp III high Q form factor ratio analysis. Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp III Collaboration

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

PoS(KAON09)023. Beam Hole Photon Veto For J-PARC K O TO experiment. Yosuke Maeda Kyoto University

Lecture 2 & 3. Particles going through matter. Collider Detectors. PDG chapter 27 Kleinknecht chapters: PDG chapter 28 Kleinknecht chapters:

SEARCH FOR INTERMEDIATE VECTOR BOSONS AND OTHER PROCESSES USING HIGH-ENERGY NEUTRINOS AND FE-MAGNET SPARK CHAMBERS

Relativistic Kinematics Cont d

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

NA62: Ultra-Rare Kaon Decays

Measuring Form Factors and Structure Functions With CLAS

Beam-Helicity Asymmetry ƔP P K+K system

Neutrino Event Tagging Based On Nucleon Energy Spectra

-221. FEATURES OF EXPERIMENTS AT ENERGIES ABOVE 1 TeV

Measurements of liquid xenon s response to low-energy particle interactions

Problem Set # 2 SOLUTIONS

Recent Results from 7 GeV proton proton running at CMS

The HARP Experiment. G. Vidal-Sitjes (INFN-Ferrara) on behalf of the HARP Collaboration

SOME COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS ABOUT THE Ft.;TURE OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS AT NAL. M. L. Stevenson I.awrence Berkeley Laboratory

28 GeV/c BEAM DUMP EXPERIMENTS. John M. LoSecco University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ABSTRACT

DESY Summer Students Program 2008: Exclusive π + Production in Deep Inelastic Scattering

Particle Physics Homework Assignment 3

Electroweak Physics at the Tevatron

Interaction of particles in matter

Last Lecture 1) Silicon tracking detectors 2) Reconstructing track momenta

COMPASS Drell-Yan. Michela Chiosso, University of Torino and INFN. TMD ECT* Workshop April 2016

Lecture 3 (Part 1) Physics 4213/5213

THE FORWARD DETECTOR OF THE ANKE SPECTROMETER. SCINTILLATION AND CHERENKOV HODOSCOPES

The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511

Experimental Particle Physics Informal Lecture & Seminar Series Lecture 1 Detectors Overview

ATLAS EXPERIMENT : HOW THE DATA FLOWS. (Trigger, Computing, and Data Analysis)

HSC KICKSTART PHYSICS WORKSHOP

STUDENT WORKSHEET: BUBBLE CHAMBER PICTURES

Identification of Central Production in the π + π π + π Channel at COMPASS

Nuclear Astrophysics II

LONG-SPILL MUON AND NEUTRINO BEAMS IN AREA I. T. Kirk Harvard University ABSTRACT

Recent results at the -meson region from the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 collider

Time of Flight Technique

Examples for experiments that can be done at the T9 beam line

Introduction to the Standard Model

A Measurement of the Induced polarization of electro-produced Λ(1116) with CLAS

QE or not QE, that is the question

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 19 Jun 2004

DC HORN FOR VERY HIGH ENERGY SPARK-CHAMBER NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS. D. H. Frisch Massachusetts Institute of Technology. and

Internal Brems. Direct Emission. π + (M1) K L γ * π -

Studies of the diffractive photoproduction of isolated photons at HERA

NEON-HYDROGEN MIXTURES AND TRACK-SENSITIVE TARGETS FOR BUBBLE-CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS AT NAL. V. P. Kenney University of Notre Dame ABSTRACT

The Alice Experiment Felix Freiherr von Lüdinghausen

A SPARK CHAMBER MEASUREMENT OF THE REACTIONS + IT- + p - p. + p at 15 GeV/c*

Detector Basics I. Mark Messier Indiana University. Neutrino Summer School 2009 July 6, 2009 Fermilab, IL

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

Photonuclear Reactions and Nuclear Transmutation. T. Tajima 1 and H. Ejiri 2

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

Discovery of the W and Z 0 Bosons

Synchrotron Radiation a Tool for Precise Beam Energy Measurements at the ILC

PoS(Bormio2012)013. K 0 production in pp and pnb reactions. Jia-Chii Berger-Chen

Chapter test: Probing the Heart of Matter

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment. M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)

Study of the Neutron Detection Efficiency of the CLAS12 Detector. Keegan Sherman

Transcription:

SPARK-CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS: 1T - + P - K O + 1\0 AT 100 GEV J. H. Smith University of Illinois In other study groups large spark-chamber magnets have been 1 2 proposed.' These magnets are to be used as triggered ''bubble chambers" with the magnetic -field region filled with detectors. Such a device is useful at very high energies, it is argued, because the usual reaction is of high multiplicity. This report singles out for analysis a 0 particular reaction of low multiplicity 1T - + P - If + 1\. to investigate what types of magnets and what types of apparatus are necessary to measure the cross section in the forward peak as a function of angle at 100 GeV incident 1T-. All aspects of the feasibility or interest in this experiment have not been investigated; it has been used merely as an example. The configuration chosen for study is shown in Fig. 1. The pion beam is incident on a liquid hydrogen target 1 m long. The 1\.0 decay is detected in a large spark-chamber system around the target, and the K O decay into two charged 1T'S is detected in a pair of spark chambers before and a pair of spark chambers after the magnet. The magnet allows a momentum measurement of the two decay pions. Their momenta plus a measurement of their opening angle allows the mass of the K O to be reconstructed and its angle of production measured. -1

-2 Rate <;tnd Beam Requirements The 11"- (p, AO)K o cross section has been measured at 8 GeV. It is 27 f-lbarns with about 22 f-lbarns in the forward peak. The shape of the forward cross section is exp (9.7 t) so that most of the peak lies at 20'(0)-2 havior s with 0'(0) = 1/2 gives an expected cross section of 1. 76 O f-lbarns at 100 GeV. Only 2/3 of all A decay with charged products. Only 2/3 of the KO,s decay into charged pions and only 1/2 are short lived. Therefore 2/3 x 2/3 x 1/2 = 2/9 of all decays are visible giving 0.39 f-lbarns as a visible cross section. If all of these could be seen, 23-30-6 there would be 6 x 10 xo.07 x 100 x 0.39 x 10 = 1.7 x 10 events 6 per incident 11" meson. A beam of 10 pions per pulse is adequate for the experiment, and it might be possible to pass such a beam directly through the chambers, but more likely they would have to be locally desensitized. The beam presents no special problems. Mass Resolution If terms in the pion mass are neglected and angles assumed small then the mass of the If is given by where Pi and P2 are the momenta of the decay pions, and () 12 is the momentum transfers less than 4 pion masses. Assuming a Regge be -2

-3 opening angle between them. The error in the mass is 2i!.8 2i!.m + + 12 m ~ Assuming that the two momentum error terms are equal, but uncorrelated, we get i!.m m + The error in the momentum can be made very small by making the magnet large, but there is little to be gained in making it much smaller than the angle-error term. If i!.cf> is the characteristic accuracy to which the angle of a single track can be measured i!.8 12 ~ ~ i!.cf> since the opening angle involves the independent measurement of the angle of two tracks. The momentum is given by p(gevj 3 100 B (kg) r (meters), and the radius of the track is determined by measuring its angle of bend Cl' as it passes a distance L through the field. Thus, 3 BL p 1007 Then, -3

The error in the angle of bend is the independent sum of the errors in the angles of a track before and after the magnet, or in magnitude Finally, 6p P 6m m.,jr6!fj ( 1 Cl' f) Cl' + 6!fJ. 12 To make the two errors comparable it is necessary to make the angle of bend roughly equal to the opening angle divided by...rz:; or 3 BL P = 100 A suitable magnet therefore has BL Now p8 /2 is the transverse momentum given to one of the pions in 12 KO decay or approximately 0.2 GeV. 100 BL 3:J2 0.2 11.5 kg.m. Therefore a suitable magnet has Actually since the momentum measurement also involves one of the angles necessary for the opening angle, the momentum and angle C.1-68-18-4 -4

-5 Ll.m 10 2L1.1> m 500 e;;' Then, 1 100 At 100 GeV Ii12 = 8 mrads so that the necessary angular resolution is Ll.1> 0.08 mrads. Transverse Momentum Resolution O The transverse momentum of the K is given by measurements are correlated in such a way that this number is reduced somewhat to about 7 kg m. This number is quite small, and it is worthwhile pointing out that since transverse momentum in any particle decays are of the order of 0.2 GeV that the result is general. Magnets of this size will be useful in the laboratory. Perhaps a 20 kg m magnet would be a good, modest choice. If a mass peak 20 MeV wide is sufficient to identify KO,s unambiguously, -5

-6..jZp68 + ~ 86p. As in the section on mass resolution The two terms are comparable when Cl' =,;Y 8 since 8 for one particle is, on the average, 8 /2 in the forward direction the two terms are 12 equal when Cl' = 8 /..;c:: i. e. exactly the same criterion as for the mass 12 resolution. and If the two sources of error are made equal, they add independently 6p 1 =.[G X (first term) 2p6c/J. The experiment would have sufficient accuracy for most purposes if the forward peak out to 4 pion masses were to be broken up into 20 angular intervals. Thus 0.14 GeV 6Pl 20 Thus 0.14 2000 0.07 mrads. This is almost exactly the same as necessary for reasonable mass resolution! -6

Angular Resolution of the Apparatus Necessary angular resolution was shown to be of the order of 0.07 mrads. If wire planes are used to determine the position of the particle, these are capable of something like 0.25 mm resolution. The necessary distance D between planes is D 0.2Smm 0.00007 Sm. The factor of $comes from the two independent positions necessary to determine the angle. Lateral Size of the Magnet In order to let the K O decay over one-mean free path, a drift space of 5.4 m is necessary at 100 GeV. The target must be placed, then, - 5 m from the first wire plane which is in turn S m from the magnet. One of the pions can depart from the direction of the K O by about 8 mrads. The K O in urn can go out to angles of 4 x 0.14 100 5.6 mrads, from the forward direction, if momentum transfers of 4 pion masses are to be measured. All the pions are contained in a cone of 13.6 mrads which subtends a distance of 13.6 cm at a distance of 10 m. The magnet must, therefore, have an aperture of 27 cm or about 1 foot square. C.1-68-18-7 -7

-8 The Magnet It is probably unreasonable to construct a magnet as small as seems necessary. A fairly reasonable compromise useful for p-mesons. etc. would be a magnet 24 in. x 24 in. x 48 in. long with a field of 15 kg. To take care of the lateral bending of low-momentum particles it should probably be somewhat wider than tall--say 30 in. wide by 48 in. long with a gap of 24 in. Lower Energies Lower -energy reactions are taken care of by moving the target closer to the magnet - -everything scales accordingly. Triggering Requirements In order to actually perform this experiment a suitable trigger must be devised. A pion incident followed by nothing. i. e. no charged particle, out followed by two charged particles through the magnet would probably be sufficient. but might be bedevilled by 1T - charge exchange with the '{-ray converting. The addition of a!i. requirement would almost certainly reduce the trigger rate to a tractable value. Difficulties channel. This does not seem an insurmountable background to handle with 1T O anti-counters around the target. Such an anti would also handle the ~o K O reaction if it were very efficient. -8

-9 The A's produced in this experiment are very slow, varying from 0.2 GeV at forward angles to 0.6 GeV at 50' to the forward direction. Many of these decay before leaving the target and any anticoincidence scheme must be very thoroughly understood so that the anticoincidence does not invalidate the angular distribution. This may be such a serious question as to prevent the experiment from being done in this way. Necessary Equipment and Facilities The experiment is conceived of as being done with wire spark chambers. The array for detecting the decaying KO,s is very straightforward, that for the A definitely quite complicated. If logical reduction of the data is done on -line, a fairly sophisticated computer will be necessary. One possibility is that high enough rates can be handled so O that triggering can be done on the K only and events selected on the basis of computation. At any rate, the experiment is envisoned as using an on-line computer. The magnet, even though it is not a very large piece of equipment, is special enough to warrant mention. Aside from these, the principal interest in this discussion seems to me to be that a reasonable experiment can be performed with very little in the way of special NAL-supplied equipment. The experimental layout is shown in Fig. 1. A space about 60 ft long by 10ft wide is needed for the experiment plus space for one large or two small trailers and shields and beam stop. -9

-10 Detecting Extra Neutral Pions by Measuring the K O Energy Precisely Considerable discussion arose concerning the modest scheme proposed in the previous sections. The chief questions concerned the practicability of measuring the K O energy itself to sufficient accuracy to detect a missing Tfo. The difference between the energy of the incoming Tf - and the outgoing K O must be known to one pion mass, 0.140 GeV or 0.14 percent of the total energy of 100 GeV. The incoming pion beam energy can only be defined to about 0.1 percent so that the outgoing K O energy must be known also to 0.1 percent. Subject to a few simple approximations it can be shown that the relative error in the energy is AE 100 P 2 x -3- BL E where p is the momentum of the K O, BL is the field times the path length through the bending magnet, and 0 is the accuracy to which a spark position can be measured in chambers a distance S apart before the magnet and after the magnet. If p = 100 GeV and 0 = 0.25 mm and AE/E = 0.001 BLS There is the obvious choice of a powerful magnet or long measuring distance. A reasonable choice, though not necessarily optimum, is -10

-11 s = 20 m, L = 5 m, B = 17 kg. As before, the widest-angle pion goes at 13.6 mrads. Using a decay space of 5 m, distance between chambers of 20 m, and magnet length of 5 m, gives a necessary height of twice 41 cm or 81 cm. The magnets' width must be somewhat greater, perhaps 125 cm. This magnet is much larger than that required by the previous scheme, but it is not impossibly large. A decay in which each pion has 50 GeV has the following topology: A decay at 60 in the center-of-mass gives approximately 70 GeV to one pion and 30 GeV to the other. The "worst" topology looks like: -"l' ' -" "f'fc... i, '.2.21> c.. t The last chamber must be 4.5 m across and, on each firing, the position of a spark must be known to 0.25 mm, an accuracy of 1 part in 18,000. The recording apparatus must have 15 -bit accuracy - -which exceeds most present-day systems, but seems possible. Absolute accuracy could probably not be maintained at this level,

-12 but by periodically turning off the magnet a straight-through track can be recorded to determine lineup, and then a beam track recorded with the magnet on to determine the relative energy of beam and decay partides. It should be emphasized that this is not the usual case of a single -arm spectrometer that is usually self-calibrating against an elastically-scattered particle. Two sources of error have been ignored: magnet calibration and multiple scattering. The latter becomes a major error source if 0.005 radiation lengths of material are crossed before the magnet. This is about 40 m of He, so that multiple scattering is just barely smaller than other effects; it will significantly increase the error. The integral of BL can probably be calibrated to 0.1 percent- but with difficulty. In summary, the direct way looks very hard! It does not look like a setup for early experiments with the machine!

-13 REFERENCES 1 A. Roberts. Preliminary Considerations on the Characteristics of a Large Spark-Chamber Detecting System for Complex High-Energy Events, 200 BeV Accelerator: Studies on Experimental Use, Vol. 3. 1966. 2N. H. Lipman and T. G. Walker, Large Volume Magnet Spark Chamber for Operation Up to 300 GeV, Utilization Studies for a 300-GeV Proton Synchrotron. Vol. I, 1967. 3Ehrlich. Selove and Yuta, Phys. Rev. ill. 1194 (1966).

Wire Plane Wire Planes Wire Plane 100 GeV... ~ KG.I l ~ ~:...". I~; ---"---T~ :... j.. "A... :. 7r-. : I Meter Long,N " Magnet Liquid H2 Target Decoy Region 2'x2'x4'xl5Kg... L 18m ~ (') I I... 0' ""'00, I... 00 Fig. 1. Experiment on associated production at 100 GeV/c. Slow lambdas, fast KO,s are as sumed. Extra neutral pions must be eliminated by anticoincidence counters or chambers (not shown).

... ~~.. IAo Wire Plane--...E Wire Plane Wire Planes K o I I \ :-!!I ~ :,', 4" Magnet 16" 17 Kg I I I... 0' U1 U100 I I I... I 51 m----------------- 00 Fig. 2. An associated production experiment in which the energy of the K O is determined with sufficient accuracy to detect a missing neutral pion. J I (J...