Solution to Final Exam

Similar documents
J. Response Surface Methodology

G. Nested Designs. 1 Introduction. 2 Two-Way Nested Designs (Balanced Cases) 1.1 Definition (Nested Factors) 1.2 Notation. 1.3 Example. 2.

20g g g Analyze the residuals from this experiment and comment on the model adequacy.

Stat 217 Final Exam. Name: May 1, 2002

Response Surface Methodology

3. Factorial Experiments (Ch.5. Factorial Experiments)

Design & Analysis of Experiments 7E 2009 Montgomery

Lecture 10. Factorial experiments (2-way ANOVA etc)

Analysis of Variance

3.4. A computer ANOVA output is shown below. Fill in the blanks. You may give bounds on the P-value.

Blocks are formed by grouping EUs in what way? How are experimental units randomized to treatments?

Two-Way Factorial Designs

STAT22200 Spring 2014 Chapter 8A

Factorial designs. Experiments

2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 2008

Nested Designs & Random Effects

Suppose we needed four batches of formaldehyde, and coulddoonly4runsperbatch. Thisisthena2 4 factorial in 2 2 blocks.

Stat 6640 Solution to Midterm #2

Written Exam (2 hours)

7. Response Surface Methodology (Ch.10. Regression Modeling Ch. 11. Response Surface Methodology)

Design of Engineering Experiments Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorials

Reference: Chapter 14 of Montgomery (8e)

Stat 579: Generalized Linear Models and Extensions

STAT Final Practice Problems

Factorial Treatment Structure: Part I. Lukas Meier, Seminar für Statistik

Contents. TAMS38 - Lecture 8 2 k p fractional factorial design. Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu. Example 0 - continued 4. Example 0 - Glazing ceramic 3

Reference: Chapter 13 of Montgomery (8e)

Institutionen för matematik och matematisk statistik Umeå universitet November 7, Inlämningsuppgift 3. Mariam Shirdel

Design and Analysis of Experiments

2.830 Homework #6. April 2, 2009

Lec 5: Factorial Experiment

Reference: Chapter 6 of Montgomery(8e) Maghsoodloo

Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology

Stat664 Homework #3 due April 21 Turn in problems marked with

MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS FINAL EXAM - STATISTICS FALL 1999

Two-factor studies. STAT 525 Chapter 19 and 20. Professor Olga Vitek

2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 2008

Lecture 22 Mixed Effects Models III Nested designs

23. Fractional factorials - introduction

One-way ANOVA (Single-Factor CRD)

Statistics GIDP Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Methodology

Orthogonal contrasts for a 2x2 factorial design Example p130

Outline Topic 21 - Two Factor ANOVA

Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs

Unit 7: Random Effects, Subsampling, Nested and Crossed Factor Designs

Lecture 9: Factorial Design Montgomery: chapter 5

Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs Solutions

Response Surface Methodology

The One-Quarter Fraction

Chapter 11: Factorial Designs

Lecture 11: Nested and Split-Plot Designs

OPTIMIZATION OF FIRST ORDER MODELS

ST3232: Design and Analysis of Experiments

Experimental design (KKR031, KBT120) Tuesday 11/ :30-13:30 V

Unit 12: Analysis of Single Factor Experiments

Addition of Center Points to a 2 k Designs Section 6-6 page 271

Chapter 13 Experiments with Random Factors Solutions

Lec 1: An Introduction to ANOVA

Nesting and Mixed Effects: Part I. Lukas Meier, Seminar für Statistik

Unit 12: Response Surface Methodology and Optimality Criteria

Open book and notes. 120 minutes. Covers Chapters 8 through 14 of Montgomery and Runger (fourth edition).

SMA 6304 / MIT / MIT Manufacturing Systems. Lecture 10: Data and Regression Analysis. Lecturer: Prof. Duane S. Boning

Assignment 9 Answer Keys

Answer Keys to Homework#10

MATH602: APPLIED STATISTICS

Note: The problem numbering below may not reflect actual numbering in DGE.

Statistics 512: Applied Linear Models. Topic 9

STAT 705 Chapter 16: One-way ANOVA

Two-Way Analysis of Variance - no interaction

14.0 RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSM)

Fractional Factorial Designs

I i=1 1 I(J 1) j=1 (Y ij Ȳi ) 2. j=1 (Y j Ȳ )2 ] = 2n( is the two-sample t-test statistic.

STAT 430 (Fall 2017): Tutorial 8

These are multifactor experiments that have

19. Blocking & confounding

Higher Order Factorial Designs. Estimated Effects: Section 4.3. Main Effects: Definition 5 on page 166.

Contents. 2 2 factorial design 4

The 2 k Factorial Design. Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba 1

2 k, 2 k r and 2 k-p Factorial Designs

Topic 9: Factorial treatment structures. Introduction. Terminology. Example of a 2x2 factorial

STAT 135 Lab 9 Multiple Testing, One-Way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis

STAT 135 Lab 10 Two-Way ANOVA, Randomized Block Design and Friedman s Test

Homework 3 - Solution

Introduction to Matrix Algebra

Response Surface Methodology:

CS 5014: Research Methods in Computer Science

Ch. 5 Two-way ANOVA: Fixed effect model Equal sample sizes

Chap The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

44.2. Two-Way Analysis of Variance. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

A Study on Factorial Designs with Blocks Influence and Inspection Plan for Radiated Emission Testing of Information Technology Equipment

Lecture 4. Random Effects in Completely Randomized Design

Chapter 13: Analysis of variance for two-way classifications

Fractional Factorial Designs

IE 361 Module 21. Design and Analysis of Experiments: Part 2

TWO-LEVEL FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS: BLOCKING. Upper-case letters are associated with factors, or regressors of factorial effects, e.g.

Analysis of Variance and Design of Experiments-I

Probability Distribution

22s:152 Applied Linear Regression. Take random samples from each of m populations.

ST 512-Practice Exam I - Osborne Directions: Answer questions as directed. For true/false questions, circle either true or false.

22s:152 Applied Linear Regression. There are a couple commonly used models for a one-way ANOVA with m groups. Chapter 8: ANOVA

Transcription:

Stat 660 Solution to Final Exam. (5 points) A large pharmaceutical company is interested in testing the uniformity (a continuous measurement that can be taken by a measurement instrument) of their film-coated pain-killer pills produced at various blending sites. Among the large pool of blending sites, four were randomly chosen. In each site, a large number of batches of such pills were produced regularly. A random sample of five batches were collected from each of the four blending sites. Three pills were assayed from each batch. Carefully explain how the experiment should be conducted and how the data collected from such experiment should be analyzed. Be specific about the ANOVA table. This is a fully nested design in which factor A (blending site) has a = levels and factor B (batch), which is nested within factor A, has b = 5 levels (batches). Each batch has n = 3 replicates (pills). Both factors are random. The effect model can be expressed as y ijk = µ + α i + β j(i) + ε ijk, i =,,, j =,, 5, k =,, 3, where µ = overall population mean α i = ith random effect of factor A β j(i) = jth random effect of factor B nested within the ith level of factor A ε ijk = error (N = 60 i.i.d. N(0, σ )). The model assumptions are listed below: α,, α form a random sample of N(0, σ a); {β (i),, β 5(i) } form a random sample of N(0, σb ) for each i =,, ; all ab + abn = 0 + 60 = 80 r.v. s are independent. The sums of squares are (a) SS T = 5 3 i= j= k= y ijk T.../60 (b) SS E = 5 3 i= j= k= y ijk 5 i= j= T ij. /3; MS E = SS E /0. (c) SS A = i= T i.. /5 T.../60; MS A = SS A /3. (d) SS B(A) = 5 i= j= T ij. /3 i= T i.. /5; MS B(A) = SS B(A) /6.

Hypotheses of interest: H A 0 : σ a = 0; H B 0 : σ b = 0. The ANOVA table is given by Source SS DF MS E[MS] F A SS A 3 MS A σ + 3σ b + 5σ a MS A /MS B(A) BωA SS B(A) 6 MS B(A) σ + 3σ b MS B(A) /MS E Residual SS E 0 MS E σ Total SS T 59. Two coded variables x = (A 90)/8, x = (B 7)/ are examined, and the data below are obtained. It is known that the standard deviation of an observation is. x x y 6 + 3 + 5 + + 8 0 0 3 (a) (3 points) model. Fit a first-order model (that is, planar model) and check the appropriateness of the

First of all, the standard error of effect is std.error(effect) = nf σ = = and an effect can be judged as significant if its magnitude is greater than, twice the standard error of effect. The effects are A = 3 + 8 B = 5 + 8 AB = 6 + 8 6 + 5 6 + 3 3 + 5 = 5 = 7 = Both main effects are significant. The interaction is insignificant. Moreover, the curvature effect can be checked: y f y c = 6 + 3 + 5 + 8 with a standard error for the curvature effect: std.error(curvature) = σ + = 3 = 0 5 =.36. We have zero curvature effect. The planar model seems to be appropriate. (b) ( points) Disregard the appropriateness/inappropriateness of the first order model, use the first-order model in (a) to answer the question below: Is the point (A, B) = (60, 38) on the path of steepest ascent? The first order model is given by ŷ = 3 7.5x + 3.5x The steepest ascent direction is simultaneously moving a multiple of in x and 3.5 7.5 = 7 5 in x. Note that x = 60 90 8 = 3.75 when A = 60 and x = 38 7 =.75 = 3.75 7 5 when B = 38. Hence, the point (A, B) = (60, 38) is on the path of steepest ascent. 3. In the second chemical example by Montgomery (the data are reproduced here), focus on the response yield only. 3

original coded responses factors variables yield viscosity molecular weight R T x x y y y 3 80 70 76.5 6 90 90 70 + 78.0 66 3680 80 80 + 77.0 60 370 90 80 + + 79.5 59 3890 85 75 0 0 79.9 7 380 85 75 0 0 80.3 69 300 85 75 0 0 80.0 68 30 85 75 0 0 79.7 70 390 85 75 0 0 79.8 7 3500 77.93 75 0 75.6 7 300 9.07 75 0 78. 68 3360 85 67.93 0 77.0 57 350 85 8.07 0 78.5 58 3630 The fitted quadratic model is ŷ = 79. + 0.99x + 0.5x.38x.00x + 0.5x x. The estimated error is ˆσ = 0.66. (a) ( points) Check the adequacy of exact quadratic in x direction. The standard error is β 78. 75.6 β = 78.0 + 79.5 76.5 77.0 == 0.0. std.error( β β ) = 0.66 8 + 8 + = 0.88. The exact quadratic in x direction seems to be justified since the magnitude of the estimate is less than twice the standard error. (b) ( points) to answer the question.) What type of response surface for yield? Why? (Use the attached computer output The response surface in the design range is approximately a hill with simple maximum since the eigenvalues are both negative and comparable in magnitude and the stationary point (0.3866, 0.30838) is located within the design region.

. (3 points) A -run composite design is performed. The observed responses from the design is shown on the figure below. Comment on the adequacy of the first-order model simply by inspecting this figure. Hint: How do you draw the contour of responses? 7 7 73 x 0 7 75 7 75 7 7 7 7 76 0 x The first-order model is inappropriate since the response surface contour appears to be nonlinear (that is, one can not capture the response contour with a system of parallel lines). 5. (3 points) Identify the design below using the notation k p R : basic defining relations where k = # of factors, p = # of basic words, and R = Resolution. State the reasons of your answer. 5

This is a 6 IV : E = BCD, F = ABC design, reasoned below. Note that factors A, B, C, and D form a full factorial (though not displayed in standard order). Factor E takes on the reversed signs of BCD and factor F is completely confounded with ABC. The complete set of generators should also include EF = AD. The complete set of defining relations is I = BCDE = ABCF = ADEF with shortest word length of. Consequently, this is a = -fraction resolution IV design in 6 = = 6 runs with 6 factors and basic generators E = BCD, F = ABC. A B C D E F + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 6

Computer Output for Problem 3(c) ============================== = CANONICAL ANALYSIS = ============================== <EIGENVALUES and STATIONARY POINT (in original coordinates)>: Stationary Row Eigenvalues Point -.73 0.3866-0.9657 0.30838 <EIGENVECTORS>: Matrix Eigenvectors 0.95797 0.86865-0.86865 0.95797 <CONSTANT IN TRANSFORMED COORDINATES>: YSHAT 79.675 ======================================== The sorted absolute eigen values are: Eigenvalues 0.9657.73 7