Hölder regularity estimation by Hart Smith and Curvelet transforms

Similar documents
ON CONVERGENCE OF TRANSFORMS BASED ON PARABOLIC SCALING

Harmonic Analysis Homework 5

On the Structure of Anisotropic Frames

SINGULARITY DETECTION AND PROCESSING WITH WAVELETS

Microlocal Methods in X-ray Tomography

Part 2 Introduction to Microlocal Analysis

l(y j ) = 0 for all y j (1)

Sobolev spaces. May 18

We denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.

An introduction to Mathematical Theory of Control

Reproducing formulas associated with symbols

Math The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution

DECOUPLING LECTURE 6

The wave front set of a distribution

Part 2 Introduction to Microlocal Analysis

Obstacle Problems Involving The Fractional Laplacian

Notes on Distributions

ORTHONORMAL SAMPLING FUNCTIONS

Fourier transform of tempered distributions

Preliminary Exam 2016 Solutions to Morning Exam

TOOLS FROM HARMONIC ANALYSIS

Notes. 1 Fourier transform and L p spaces. March 9, For a function in f L 1 (R n ) define the Fourier transform. ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e 2πi x,ξ dx.

MATH 590: Meshfree Methods

Approximation by Conditionally Positive Definite Functions with Finitely Many Centers

Wavelet Bi-frames with Uniform Symmetry for Curve Multiresolution Processing

Contents Ordered Fields... 2 Ordered sets and fields... 2 Construction of the Reals 1: Dedekind Cuts... 2 Metric Spaces... 3

6.14 Review exercises for Chapter 6

NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES

1 Continuity Classes C m (Ω)

Preliminary Exam 2018 Solutions to Morning Exam

Construction of Orthonormal Quasi-Shearlets based on quincunx dilation subsampling

RESULTS ON FOURIER MULTIPLIERS

A COUNTEREXAMPLE TO AN ENDPOINT BILINEAR STRICHARTZ INEQUALITY TERENCE TAO. t L x (R R2 ) f L 2 x (R2 )

THE MATTILA INTEGRAL ASSOCIATED WITH SIGN INDEFINITE MEASURES. Alex Iosevich and Misha Rudnev. August 3, Introduction

A Walking Tour of Microlocal Analysis

HOMEOMORPHISMS OF BOUNDED VARIATION

SOLUTIONS TO SELECTED PROBLEMS FROM ASSIGNMENTS 3, 4

Taylor and Laurent Series

(x k ) sequence in F, lim x k = x x F. If F : R n R is a function, level sets and sublevel sets of F are any sets of the form (respectively);

Analysis Finite and Infinite Sets The Real Numbers The Cantor Set

S chauder Theory. x 2. = log( x 1 + x 2 ) + 1 ( x 1 + x 2 ) 2. ( 5) x 1 + x 2 x 1 + x 2. 2 = 2 x 1. x 1 x 2. 1 x 1.

Oscillatory Motion. Simple pendulum: linear Hooke s Law restoring force for small angular deviations. Oscillatory solution

g(x) = P (y) Proof. This is true for n = 0. Assume by the inductive hypothesis that g (n) (0) = 0 for some n. Compute g (n) (h) g (n) (0)

BAND-LIMITED REFINABLE FUNCTIONS FOR WAVELETS AND FRAMELETS

Oscillatory Motion. Simple pendulum: linear Hooke s Law restoring force for small angular deviations. small angle approximation. Oscillatory solution

Computational Harmonic Analysis (Wavelet Tutorial) Part II

In this chapter we study elliptical PDEs. That is, PDEs of the form. 2 u = lots,

1.5 Approximate Identities

Hamburger Beiträge zur Angewandten Mathematik

Exponential tail behavior for solutions to the homogeneous Boltzmann equation

Remarks on Bronštein s root theorem

ξ,i = x nx i x 3 + δ ni + x n x = 0. x Dξ = x i ξ,i = x nx i x i x 3 Du = λ x λ 2 xh + x λ h Dξ,

Appearance of Anomalous Singularities in. a Semilinear Parabolic Equation. (Tokyo Institute of Technology) with Shota Sato (Tohoku University)

WAVELETS WITH COMPOSITE DILATIONS

Real Analysis Math 125A, Fall 2012 Sample Final Questions. x 1+x y. x y x. 2 (1+x 2 )(1+y 2 ) x y

Bounded point derivations on R p (X) and approximate derivatives

Calculus of Variations. Final Examination

RKHS, Mercer s theorem, Unbounded domains, Frames and Wavelets Class 22, 2004 Tomaso Poggio and Sayan Mukherjee

University of Pavia. M Estimators. Eduardo Rossi

Immerse Metric Space Homework

Introduction to Microlocal Analysis

Random measures, intersections, and applications

Gaussian Measure of Sections of convex bodies

On the Notion of an Automorphic Representation *

Complex Analysis, Stein and Shakarchi Meromorphic Functions and the Logarithm

Finite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product

Chapter One. The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity

Algebras of singular integral operators with kernels controlled by multiple norms

Lecture 9 February 2, 2016

Continuous Curvelet Transform: I. Resolution of the Wavefront Set

Generalized Shearlets and Representation Theory

Decouplings and applications

WEAK VORTICITY FORMULATION FOR THE INCOMPRESSIBLE 2D EULER EQUATIONS IN DOMAINS WITH BOUNDARY

POINTWISE BOUNDS ON QUASIMODES OF SEMICLASSICAL SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS IN DIMENSION TWO

Banach Spaces V: A Closer Look at the w- and the w -Topologies

Takens embedding theorem for infinite-dimensional dynamical systems

Fourier Transform & Sobolev Spaces

Notation. General. Notation Description See. Sets, Functions, and Spaces. a b & a b The minimum and the maximum of a and b

Overview of normed linear spaces

Reminder Notes for the Course on Distribution Theory

Exercises from other sources REAL NUMBERS 2,...,

APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENTIABILITY IN R n.

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015)

ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS. 1 cos(nx) lim. n 2 x 2. g n (x) = 1 cos(nx) n 2 x 2. x 2.

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015)

In: Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society (Series 2), 53 (1), , 2010

NOTES ON THE REGULARITY OF QUASICONFORMAL HOMEOMORPHISMS

VANISHING BERGMAN KERNELS. University of Barcelona. October 14, / 14

Bernstein s inequality and Nikolsky s inequality for R d

Handout 6: Rotational motion and moment of inertia. Angular velocity and angular acceleration

Part III. 10 Topological Space Basics. Topological Spaces

Math 61CM - Solutions to homework 6

Classical Fourier Analysis

be the set of complex valued 2π-periodic functions f on R such that

COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014

Multiscale Geometric Analysis: Thoughts and Applications (a summary)

SCALE INVARIANT FOURIER RESTRICTION TO A HYPERBOLIC SURFACE

THE INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM

On the Hilbert Transform of Wavelets

2. Function spaces and approximation

Transcription:

Hölder regularity estimation by Hart Smith and Curvelet transforms Jouni Sampo Lappeenranta University Of Technology Department of Mathematics and Physics Finland 18th September 2007

This research is done in collaboration with Dr. Songkiat Sumetkijakan (Chulalongkorn University, Department of Mathematics, Bangkok, Thailand)

Outline Basic definitions 1 Basic definitions Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform 2 Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties 3 4

Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Uniform and Pointwice Hölder Regularity Definition Let α > 0 and α / N. A function f : R d R is said to be pointwise Hölder regular with exponent α at u, denoted by f C α (u), if there exists a polynomial P u of degree less than α and a constant C u such that for all x in a neighborhood of u f (x) P u (x u) C u x u α. (1) Let Ω be an open subset of R d. If (1) holds for all x, u Ω with C u being a uniform constant independent of u, then we say that f is uniformly Hölder regular with exponent α on Ω or f C α (Ω).

Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Uniform and Pointwise Hölder Exponents The uniform and pointwise Hölder exponents of f on Ω and at u are defined as α l (Ω) := sup{α: f C α (Ω)} and α p (u) := sup{α: f C α (u)}.

Local Hölder exponent Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Definition Let (I i ) i N be a family of nested open sets in R d, i.e. I i+1 I i, with intersection i I i = {u}. The local Hölder exponent of a function f at u, denoted by α l (u), is α l (u) = lim i α l (I i ). In many situations, local and pointwise Hölder exponents coincide, e.g., if f (x) = x γ then α p (0) = α l (0) = γ. However, local Hölder exponents α l (u) is also sensitive to oscillating behavior of f near ( the point u. A simple example is f (x) = x γ sin 1/ x β) for which α p (0) = γ but α l (0) = γ 1+β, i.e., α l is influenced by the wild oscillatory behavior of f near 0.

Directional Hölder regularity Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Definition Let v R d be a fixed unit vector and u R d. A function f : R d R is pointwise Hölder regular with exponent α at u in the direction v, denoted by f C α (u; v), if there exist a constant C u,v and a polynomial P u,v of degree less than α such that f (u + λv) P u,v (λ) C u,v λ α holds for all λ in a neighborhood of 0 R. If one can choose C u,v so that it is independent of u for all u Ω R d and the inequality holds for all λ R such that u + λv Ω, then we say that f is uniformly Hölder regular with exponent α on Ω in direction v or f C α (Ω; v).

Directional Vanishing Moments Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Definition A function f of two variables is said to have an L-order directional vanishing moments along a direction v = (v 1, v 2 ) T (suppose that v 1 0; if v 1 = 0 then v 2 0 and we can swap the two dimensions) if t n f (t, tv 2 /v 1 c)dt = 0, c R, 0 n L. R Essentially, the above definition means that any 1-D slices of the function have vanishing moments of order L.

Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Building Function with Directional Vanishing Moments At spatial domain the design is challenging if vanishing moment in many directions are needed In frequency domain the design is relatively easy If ˆf (n) (ω 1, ω 2 ) vanish at line ω 2 = v 1 /v 2 ω 1 for all n = 0,..., L then f have L-order directional vanishing moments along a direction v = (v 1, v 2 ) T

Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Building Function with Directional Vanishing Moments At spatial domain the design is challenging if vanishing moment in many directions are needed In frequency domain the design is relatively easy If ˆf (n) (ω 1, ω 2 ) vanish at line ω 2 = v 1 /v 2 ω 1 for all n = 0,..., L then f have L-order directional vanishing moments along a direction v = (v 1, v 2 ) T

Kernel of Hart Smith Transform Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform For a given ϕ L 2 (R 2 ), we define ) ϕ abθ (x) = a 3 4 ϕ (D 1 R θ (x b), a for θ [0, 2π), b R 2 R θ is the matrix affecting planar rotation of θ radians in clockwise direction. 0 < a < a 0, where a 0 is a fixed coarsest scale ( ) = diag 1 a, a 1 D 1 a

Kernel of Hart Smith Transform Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Width and length of essential support of kernel function ϕ abθ (x) are about a and a 1/2.

Kernel of Hart Smith Transform Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Essential support of kernel function ϕ abθ (x) become like a needle when scale a become smaller.

Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Reconstruction Formula for Hart Smith Transform Theorem There exists a Fourier multiplier M of order 0 so that whenever f L 2 (R 2 ) is a high-frequency function supported in frequency space ξ > 2 a 0, then f = a0 2π 0 0 R 2 ϕ abθ, Mf ϕ abθ db dθ da a 3 in L 2 (R 2 ). (2) The function Mf is defined in the frequency domain by a multiplier formula Mf (ξ) = m( ξ )ˆf (ξ), where m is a standard Fourier multiplier of order 0 (that is, for each k 0, there is a constant C k such that for all t R, m (k) (t) C k ( 1 + t 2 ) k/2 ).

Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Reconstruction Formula for Hart Smith Transform Because of this and the fact that ϕ abθ and Mϕ abθ are duals, we can write reconstruction formula also as a0 2π f = Mϕ abθ, f ϕ abθ db dθ da 0 0 R 2 a 3 a0 2π = ϕ abθ, f Mϕ abθ db dθ da 0 0 R 2 a 3. Unlike ϕ abθ, the dual Mϕ abθ do not satisfy true parabolic dilation

Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Curvelets are defined in Fourier Domain ( Let W be a positive real-valued function supported inside 1 2, 2), called a radial window, and let V be a real-valued function supported on [ 1, 1], called an angular window, for which the following admissibility conditions hold: 0 W (r) 2 dr r = 1 and 1 At each scale a, 0 < a < a 0, γ a00 is defined by γ a00 (r cos(ω), r sin(ω)) = a 3 4 W (ar) V ( ω/ a ) 1 V (ω) 2 dω = 1. (3) for r 0 and ω [0, 2 For each 0 < a < a 0, b R 2, and θ [0, 2π), a curvelet γ abθ is defined by γ abθ (x) = γ a00 (R θ (x b)), for x R 2. (4)

Reconstruction with Curvelets Hölder regularities Vanishing moments Hart Smith Transform Continuous Curvelet Transform Theorem There exists a bandlimited purely radial function Φ such that for all f L 2 (R 2 ), f = Φ b, f Φ b db+ R 2 where Φ b (x) = Φ(x b). a0 2π 0 0 R 2 γ abθ, f γ abθ db dθ da a 3 in L 2, (5)

Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Extra conditions for kernel functions For regularity analysis we will need that Kernel functions have enough directional vanishing moments Kernel functions and their derivatives up to desired order (largest α of interest) decay fast enough.

Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Vanishing moments of kernel function Lemma There exists C < (independent of a, b and θ) such that curvelet functions γ abθ have directional vanishing moments of any order L < along all directions v that satisfy (v θ, v) Ca 1/2. Moreover if there exists finite and strictly positive constants C 1, C 1 and C 2 such that supp( ˆϕ) [C 1, C 1 ] [ C 2, C 2 ], then above is true also for functions ϕ abθ and Mϕ abθ.

Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Vanishing moments of kernel function Frequency support of ϕ abθ (x).

Decay of kernel function Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Lemma Suppose that the windows V and W in the definition of CCT are C and have compact supports. Then for each N = 1, 2,... there is a constant C N such that x R 2 ν γ abθ (x) C Na 3/4 ν 1 + x b 2N. (6) a,θ Moreover, if ˆϕ C and if there exist finite and strictly positive constants C 1, C 1, and C 2 such that supp( ˆϕ) [C 1, C 1 ] [ C 2, C 2 ], then (6) also holds for functions ϕ abθ and Mϕ abθ.

Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Necessary Condition for Uniform Regularity Theorem If a bounded function f C α (R 2 ), then there exist a constant C and a fixed coarsest scale a 0 for which φ abθ, f Ca α+ 3 4 for all 0 < a < a 0, b R 2, and θ [0, 2π).

Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Sufficient Condition for Uniform Regularity Theorem Let f L 2 (R 2 ) and α > 0 a non-integer. If there is a constant C < such that φ abθ, f Ca α+ 5 4, for all 0 < a < a 0, b R 2, and θ [0, 2π), then f C α (R 2 ).

Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Necessary Condition for Pointwise Regularity Theorem If a bounded function f C α (u) then there exists C < such that ( φ abθ, f Ca α 2 + 3 4 1 + b u α) a 1/2 (7) for all 0 < a < a 0, b R 2, and θ [0, 2π).

Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Sufficient Condition for Pointwise Regularity Theorem Let f L 2 (R 2 ) and α be a non-integer positive number. If there exist C < and α < 2α such that ( φ abθ, f Ca α+ 5 4 1 + b u α ) a 1/2, (8) for all 0 < a < a 0, b R 2, and θ [0, 2π), then f C α (u).

Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Necessary Conditions for direction of Singularity Line Now we consider situation that background is sufficiently smooth, i.e. regularity to one direction is higher. Theorem Let f be bounded with local Hölder exponent α (0, 1] at point u and f C 2α+1+ε (R 2, v θ0 ) for some θ 0 [0, 2π) with any fixed ε > 0. Then there exist α [α ε, α] and C < such that for a > 0 and b R 2, Ca α+ 5 4, ( if θ / θ 0 + Ca 1/2 [ 1, 1], φ abθ, f Ca α + 3 4 1 + b u α ), if θ θ 0 + Ca 1/2 [ 1, 1]. a

Conditions for kernel functions Uniform regularity Pointwise Regularity Directional Regularity properties Sufficient Conditions for direction of Singularity Line Theorem Let f L 2 (R 2 ), u R 2, and assume that α > 0 is not an integer. If there exist α < 2α, θ 0 [0, 2π], and C < such that ( Ca α+ 5 4 1 + b u α ) a 1/2, if θ / θ 0 + Ca 1/2 [ 1, 1] φ abθ, f ( Ca α+ 3 4 1 + b u α ) a 1/2, if θ θ 0 + Ca 1/2 [ 1, 1] for all 0 < a < a 0, b R 2, and θ [0, 2π), then f C α (u).

Figure: Decay behavior of φ a0θ, f across scales a at various angles θ for the function f (x) = e x x 1 0.25

Figure: Estimation errors of the Hölder exponents by α e (s, θ) at scales 2 s and angles θ for the function f (x) = e x x 1 0.25

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d

Generalizations Basic definitions Assumption α < 1 can be removed from all theorems Everything holds also for discrete curvelet transform Assumptions can be relaxed to hold only at ball of radius ε. Assumptions about Fourier properties of kernel functions can be relaxed Real valued kernel functions if support include reflection respect origin Compact support on Fourier domain may not be necessary Theorems could work for contourlets also With some extra assumptions of background regularity Necessary and sufficient conditions would be the same up to ε. Similar estimates for C 2 curve (now only for line singularity) Generalization from R 2 to R d