Calculation of Fragmentation Functions in Two-hadron Semi-inclusive Processes

Similar documents
light-cone (LC) variables

QCD Collinear Factorization for Single Transverse Spin Asymmetries

Single-Spin Asymmetries in SIDIS off Transversely Polarised Protons at HERMES

Transverse Spin Effects and k T -dependent Functions

Toward the QCD Theory for SSA

Distribution Functions

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 4 Feb 1997

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 25 Jun 1999

Measurements with Polarized Hadrons

Probing nucleon structure by using a polarized proton beam

Extraction of Quark Distributions on Transverse Spin of the Nucleon at the HERMES Experiment. Hidekazu Tanaka

COMPASS Measurements of Asymmetry Amplitudes in the Drell-Yan Process Observed from Scattering Pions off a Transversely Polarized Proton Target

What are the Low-Q and Large-x Boundaries of Collinear QCD Factorization Theorems?

Chiral filtering of spin states as a source of SSA. S.M. Troshin and N.E. Tyurin

HERMES status and future running

Possible relations between GPDs and TMDs

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 30 Jan 2016 Abha Rajan

Spin Densities and Chiral Odd Generalized Parton Distributions

The transverse spin and momentum structure of hadrons. 03/26/10 talk #2 Parton Model, SIDIS & TMDs. Leonard Gamberg Penn State University

QCD Factorization and Transverse Single-Spin Asymmetry in ep collisions

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 11 Mar 1994

Sivers, Boer-Mulders and transversity distributions in the difference cross sections in SIDIS

Single Spin Asymmetries on proton at COMPASS

Contribution of the twist-3 fragmentation function to single transverse-spin asymmetry in SIDIS

Generalized Parton Distributions and Nucleon Structure

Hall A/C collaboration Meeting June Xuefei Yan Duke University E Collaboration Hall A collaboration

Three-Quark Light-Cone Wave function of the Nucleon. Spin-Spin and Spin-Orbit Correlations in T-even TMDs

FINAL-STATE INTERACTIONS AND SINGLE-SPIN ASYMMETRIES IN SEMI-INCLUSIVE DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING

Two Photon Exchange in Inclusive and Semi Inclusive DIS

Scale dependence of Twist-3 correlation functions

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 14 Jul 2014

Physik Department, Technische Universität München D Garching, Germany. Abstract

The nucleon is an excitation of 3 quarks in the QCD vacuum. Understanding the vacuum structure and its properties, such as color confinement, is

hermes Collaboration

Overview of recent HERMES results

Measuring the gluon Sivers function at a future Electron-Ion Collider

Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Kaons from CLAS6

Experimental Program of the Future COMPASS-II Experiment at CERN

Contributions to our Understanding of TMDs from Polarized Proton Collisions at STAR

Measurement of Collins Asymmetries in the inclusive production of hadron pairs

Quark/gluon orbital motion and nucleon spin. Alexei Prokudin. JLab December 8, Alexei Prokudin,

Longitudinal Double Spin Asymmetry in Inclusive Jet Production at STAR

Twist Three Generalized Parton Distributions For Orbital Angular Momentum. Abha Rajan University of Virginia HUGS, 2015

Spin effects in the fragmentation of transversely polarized and unpolarized quarks*

Elementary Particle Physics

Zhongbo Kang. QCD evolution and resummation for transverse momentum distribution. Theoretical Division, Group T-2 Los Alamos National Laboratory

What are the Low-Q and Large-x Boundaries of Collinear QCD Factorization Theorems?

Gluon TMDs and Heavy Quark Production at an EIC

PoS(DIS 2010)071. Diffractive electroproduction of ρ and φ mesons at H1. Xavier Janssen Universiteit Antwerpen

Transverse SSA Measured at RHIC

Transverse Momentum Dependent Parton Distributions

Gluonic Spin Orbit Correlations

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 13 Dec 2006

Citation for published version (APA): Martinus, G. H. (1998). Proton-proton bremsstrahlung in a relativistic covariant model s.n.

Hadron Tomography. Matthias Burkardt. New Mexico State University Las Cruces, NM, 88003, U.S.A. Hadron Tomography p.

Studying Evolution with Jets at STAR. Renee Fatemi University of Kentucky May 28 th, 2015

Single Spin Asymmetry at large x F and k T

Relations between GPDs and TMDs (?)

Global Analysis for the extraction of Transversity and the Collins Function

Structure of Generalized Parton Distributions

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 12 Jul 2006

TMDs at Electron Ion Collider Alexei Prokudin

How does the proton spin?

Transverse momentum-dependent parton distributions from lattice QCD. Michael Engelhardt New Mexico State University

Hadron Mass Effects on Kaon Multiplicities: HERMES vs. COMPASS

Hadron Tomography. Matthias Burkardt. New Mexico State University Las Cruces, NM, 88003, U.S.A. Hadron Tomography p.

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Oct 2017

PoS(LHC07)034. Dijet correlations in pp collisions at RHIC

Nucleon tomography. Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS. To cite this article: Marco Radici 2014 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

Quark tensor and axial charges within the Schwinger-Dyson formalism

THE GPD EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM AT JEFFERSON LAB. C. Muñoz Camacho 1

Fragmentation Function studied with e+-e- data and its impact on the nucleon spin structure analysis

Albi Kerbizi University of Trieste, Trieste INFN Section

Spin-Momentum Correlations, Aharonov-Bohm, and Color Entanglement in Quantum Chromodynamics

Lattice QCD investigations of quark transverse momentum in hadrons. Michael Engelhardt New Mexico State University

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 1 Oct 2018

THE NUCLEUS AS A QCD LABORATORY: HADRONIZATION, 3D TOMOGRAPHY, AND MORE

PoS(CHARM2016)074. Searches for CPV in D + decays at LHCb

Relativistic model of electromagnetic one-nucleon knockout reactions

The ew pin hysics rogram of the COMPASS xperiment

Bessel Weighted Asymmetries Alexei Prokudin

Status report of Hermes

Studies of the hadronic component of the photon light-cone wave function using exclusive di-pion events at HERA

Measurements of transverse momentum in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at CLAS

Recent Development in Proton Spin Physics

Spin Structure of the Nucleon: quark spin dependence

Factorisation in Double Parton Scattering: Glauber Gluons

Inelastic scattering

Diffractive rho and phi production in DIS at HERA

Nucleon Valence Quark Structure

Factorization, Evolution and Soft factors

Nucleon Spin. Tyler Corbett

Azimuthal Asymmetries of the Drell-Yan Process in pa Collisions

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 27 Apr 2005

Geometrical Methods for Data Analysis I: Dalitz Plots and Their Uses

Zhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory

Study of transverse momentum dependent distributions from polarised Drell-Yan at COMPASS

Measurement of Polarization Observables Pz, P s z and P c z in Double-Pion Photoproduction off the Proton

Single and double polarization asymmetries from deeply virtual exclusive π 0 electroproduction

Hadron multiplicities at the HERMES experiment

Transcription:

Calculation of Fragmentation Functions in Two-hadron Semi-inclusive Processes A. Bianconi a, S. Boffi b, D. Boer c, R. Jaob d and M. Radici b arxiv:hep-ph/00032v 3 Oct 2000 a Dipartimento di Chimica e Fisica per i Materiali e per l Ingegneria, Università di Brescia, I-2533 Brescia, Italy b Dipartimento di Fisica Nucleare e Teorica, Università di Pavia, and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pavia, I-2700 Pavia, Italy c RIKEN/BNL Research Center, Physics Department, NY 973 Upton, USA d University of Wuppertal, Theoretical Physical Department, D-42097 Wuppertal, Germany Abstract. We investigate the properties of interference fragmentation functions arising from the emission of two leading hadrons inside the same jet for inclusive leptonnucleon deep-inelastic scattering. Using an extended spectator model for the mechanism of the hadronization, we give a complete calculation and numerical estimates for the examples of a proton-pion pair produced with invariant mass on the Roper resonance, and of two pions produced with invariant mass close to the mass. We discuss azimuthal angular dependence of the leading order cross section to point up favourable conditions for extracting transversity from experimental data. INTRODUCTION Because of the still lacing rigorous explanation of confinement, the nonperturbative nature of uars and gluons inside hadrons can be explored by extracting information from distribution (DF) and fragmentation functions (FF) in hard scattering processes. There are three fundamental DF that completely characterize the uar inside hadrons at leading twist with respect to its longitudinal momentum and spin: the momentum distribution f, the helicity distribution g and the transversity distribution h. At variance with the first two ones, h is difficult to address because of its chiral-odd nature. A complementary information can come from the analysis of the hadrons produced by the fragmentation process of the final uar, namely from FF. So far, only the leading unpolarized FF, D, is partly nown, which is the counterpart of f. The basic reason for such a poor nowledge is related to the difficulty of measuring more exclusive channels in hard processes. The new generation of machines (HERMES, COMPASS, RHIC) and planned projects (ELFE, EPIC) allow for a much more powerful final-state identification and, therefore, for a wider and deeper analysis of FF, particularly when

Final State Interactions (FSI) are considered. In this context, naive T-odd FF naturally arise because the existence of FSI prevents constraints from time-reversal invariance to be applied to the fragmentation process []. This new set of FF includes also chiral-odd objects that become the natural partner needed to isolate h. The presence of FSI allows that in the fragmentation process there are at least two competing channels interfering through a nonvanishing phase. However, this is not enough to generate naive T-odd FF. Excluding ab initio any mechanism breaing factorization, there are basically two ways to describe the residual interactions of the leading hadron inside the jet: assume the hadron moving in an external effective potential, or model microscopically independent interaction vertices that lead to interfering competing channels. In the former case, introduction of an external potential in principle breas the translational and rotational invariance of the problem. Further assumptions can be made about the symmetries of the potential, but at the price of loosing interesting contributions to the amplitude such as those coming from naive T-odd FF [2]. In the latter case, the difficulty consists in modelling a genuine interaction vertex that cannot be effectively reabsorbed in the soft part describing the hadronization. This poses a serious difficulty in modelling the uar fragmentation into one observed hadron because it reuires the ability of modelling the FSI between the hadron itself and the rest of the jet [2]. Therefore, here we will consider a hard process, semi-inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering (DIS), where the hadronization leads to two observed hadrons inside the same jet. A new set of interference FF arise at leading twist [2] and their symmetry properties are briefly reviewed. For the hadron pair being a proton and a pion with invariant mass eual to the Roper resonance, we have already estimated these FF using an extended version of the diuar spectator model [3]. In this case, FSI come from the interference between the direct production of the two hadrons and the decay of the Roper resonance. Here, we present results for the hadron pair being two pions with invariant mass around the mass. QUARK-QUARK CORRELATION FUNCTION In analogy with semi-inclusive hard processes involving one detected hadron in the final state [4], the simplest matrix element for the hadronisation into two hadrons is the uar-uar correlation function describing the decay of a uar with momentum into two hadrons P, P 2, namely ij (; P, P 2 ) = X d 4 ζ (2π) 4 ei ζ 0 ψ i (ζ) a P 2 a P X X a P a P2 ψ j (0) 0, () where the sum runs over all the possible intermediate states involving the two final hadrons P, P 2. Since the three external momenta, P, P 2 cannot all be collinear at the same time, we choose for convenience the frame where the total pair momentum

= P +P 2 has no transverse component. By generalizing the Collins-Soper lightcone formalism [5] for fragmentation into multiple hadrons, the cross section for two-hadron semi-inclusive emission is a linear combination of projections [Γ] of by specific Dirac structures Γ, after integrating over the (hard-scale suppressed) light-cone component + and, conseuently, taing ζ as light-lie [2]. At leading order, we get where ǫ µν T [γ ] (z h, ξ, 2 T,R2 T, T R T ) D [γ γ 5 ] (z h, ξ, 2 T,R 2 T, T R T ) ǫij T R Ti Tj M M 2 G [iσi γ 5 ] (z h, ξ, 2 T,R 2 T, T R T ) ǫijr T Tj H <) + ǫij T Tj H, (2) M + M 2 M + M 2 = ǫ +µν. The functions D, G, H<), H are the interference FF that depend on how much of the fragmenting uar momentum is carried by the hadron pair (z h = z + z 2 ), on the way this momentum is shared inside the pair (ξ = z /z h ), and on the geometry of the pair, namely on the transverse relative momentum of the two hadrons (R 2 ) and on the relative orientation between the T pair plane and the uar jet axis ( 2, T T R T, see also Fig. ). The different P α R T jet axis T P 2 uar/observed-hadronic-system plane hadron pair plane FIGURE. Kinematics for a fragmenting uar jet containing a pair of leading hadrons. Dirac structures Γ are related to different spin states of the fragmenting uar and lead to the nice probabilistic interpretation at leading order [2]: D is the probability for an unpolarized uar to produce a pair of unpolarized hadrons; G is the difference of probabilities for a longitudinally polarized uar with opposite chiralities to produce a pair of unpolarized hadrons; H <) and H both are differences of probabilities for a transversely polarized uar with opposite spins to produce a pair of unpolarized hadrons. G, H<) and H are (naive) T-odd and do not vanish only if there are residual interactions in the final state. In this case, the constraints from time-reversal invariance cannot be applied. G is chiral even; H <) and H are chiral odd and can, therefore, be identified as the chiral partners needed to access the transversity h. Given their probabilistic interpretation, they can be considered as a sort of double Collins effect [6].

NUMERICAL RESULTS In order to mae uantitative predictions, we adopt the formalism of the spectator model, specializing it to the emission of a hadron pair. The basic idea is to replace the sum over the complete set of intermediate states in E. () with an effective spectator state with a definite mass M D, momentum P D. Conseuently, the correlator simplifies to ij (; P, P 2 ) θ(p D + ) (2π) δ ( ) ( P 3 h ) 2 MD 2 0 ψi (0) P, P 2, D D, P 2, P ψ j (0) 0, where the additional δ function allows for a completely analytical calculation of the Dirac projections (2). For the hadron pair being a proton and a pion with invariant mass the mass of the Roper resonance, results have been published in Ref. [3]. In this case, the spectator state has the uantum numbers of a scalar or axial diuar. FSI arise from the interference between the direct production and the decay of the Roper resonance. Here, we show results for the hadron pair being two pions with invariant mass in the range [m Γ, m + Γ ], m = 768 MeV and Γ 250 MeV. The spectator states becomes an on-shell uar with mass m = 340 MeV. The uar decay is specialized to the set of diagrams shown in Fig. 2, and their hermitean conjugates, where the naive T-odd FF now arise from the interference between the direct production of the two π and the decay of the. Diagram 2a (3) π π 2 a b c FIGURE 2. Diagrams for uar decay into two pions through a direct channel or a resonance. accounts for almost all the strength of π π production in the relative P-channel. We have explicitly checed that diagram 2b reproduces the experimental transition probability for π π production in the relative S-channel. Hence, we believe this choice represents most of the π π strength for invariant mass in the considered interval. We define Feynman rules for the ππ, π and vertices introducing cut-offs to exclude large virtualities of the uar while eeping the asymptotic behaviour of FF at large z h consistent with the uar counting rule. We infer the vertex form factors from previous wors on the spectator model [7]. However, there numbers should be taen as indicative, since the ultimate goal is to verify that nonvanishing T-odd FF occur, particularly when integrating on some of

the inematical variables and possibly washing all interference effects out. Results of analytical calculation of E.(3) show that H = 0 and H <) = 2m G /m π. After integrating over T,R 2 T while eeping R T in the horizontal plane of the lab (usually identified with the scattering plane), we still get nonvanishing FF. As an example, H <) (z h, M h ) is shown in Fig. 3 for the fragmentation u π + π, where M h is the invariant mass of the two pions. The cross section for the deep-inelastic FIGURE 3. H <) (z h, M h ) for the fragmentation of a uar u into π + and π. scattering of an unpolarized electron on a polarized proton target where two pions are detected in the final state, contains, after integrating all the transverse dynamics (T, T,R 2), an unpolarized contribution proportional to D T (z h, M h ) and a term proportional to H <) (z h, M h ) which depends on the transverse target polarization S T. Therefore, by flipping the polarization of the target, it is possible to build the following azimuthal asymmetry A S T sin(φ RT + φ ST ) h (x) 2m π f (x) H <) (z h, M h ) D (z h, M h ), (4) where φ RT, φ ST are the azimuthal angles of R T,S T with respect to the scattering plane, respectively. The asymmetry shows indeed the familiar sinusoidal azymuthal dependence. Noteworthy is the factorization of the chiral-odd, naive T-odd H <) from the chiral-odd transversity h. Therefore, such asymmetry measurement allows for the extraction of h using a model input for the FF. REFERENCES. De Rújula A., Kaplan J.M., and de Rafael E., Nucl. Phys. B35, 365 (97). 2. Bianconi A., Boffi S., Jaob R., and Radici M., Phys. Rev. D 62, 034008 (2000). 3. Bianconi A., Boffi S., Jaob R., and Radici M., Phys. Rev. D 62, 034009 (2000). 4. Mulders P.J., and Tangerman R.D., Nucl. Phys. B 46, 97 (996). 5. Collins J.C., and Soper D.E., Nucl. Phys. B 94, 445 (982). 6. Collins J.C., Nucl. Phys. B 396, 6 (993). 7. Jaob R., Mulders P.J., and Rodrigues J., Nucl. Phys. A 626, 937 (997).