A halo-independent lower bound on the DM capture rate in the Sun from a DD signal

Similar documents
light dm in the light of cresst-ii

What is the probability that direct detection experiments have observed Dark Matter?

Update on Light WIMP Limits: LUX, lite and Light

Direct detection calculations. Riccardo Catena. Chalmers University

Can the DAMA annual modulation be explained by Dark Matter?

On Symmetric/Asymmetric Light Dark Matter

Effective theory of dark matter direct detection. Riccardo Catena. Chalmers University of Technology

Probing dark matter self-interaction in the Sun with IceCube-PINGU

Development of a New Paradigm

Halo-independent analysis of direct detection data for light WIMPs

WIMP Velocity Distribution and Mass from Direct Detection Experiments

Lecture 12. Dark Matter. Part II What it could be and what it could do

Learning from WIMPs. Manuel Drees. Bonn University. Learning from WIMPs p. 1/29

Dark Matter on the Smallest Scales Annika Peter, 7/20/09

DM direct detection predictions from hydrodynamic simulations

INDIRECT DARK MATTER DETECTION

The Four Basic Ways of Creating Dark Matter Through a Portal

Inert Doublet Model and DAMA:

Is the effect of the Sun s gravitational potential on dark matter particles observable?

Germanium-phobic exothermic Dark Matter and the CDMS-II Silicon excess

Whither WIMP Dark Matter Search? Pijushpani Bhattacharjee AstroParticle Physics & Cosmology Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata

Chapter 12. Dark Matter

Dark Matter and Dark Energy components chapter 7

pmssm Dark Matter Searches On Ice! Randy Cotta (Stanford/SLAC) In collaboration with: K.T.K. Howe (Stanford) J.L. Hewett (SLAC) T.G.

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 7 Nov 2012

Overview of Dark Matter models. Kai Schmidt-Hoberg

Thermal decoupling of WIMPs

The WIMPless Miracle and the DAMA Puzzle

Search for Inelastic Dark Matter with the CDMS experiment. Sebastian Arrenberg Universität Zürich Doktorierendenseminar 2010 Zürich,

Solar and atmospheric neutrinos as background for direct dark matter searches

No combined analysis of all experiments available

Dynamics of solar system bound WIMPs

Inelastic Dark Matter and DAMA

Dark matter Andreas Goudelis. Journée Théorie CPTGA 2017, Grenoble. LPTHE - Jussieu

Beyond Simplified Models

Daniel Gazda. Chalmers University of Technology. Progress in Ab Initio Techniques in Nuclear Physics TRIUMF, Feb 28 Mar 3, 2017

Dark Matter in Particle Physics

Project Paper May 13, A Selection of Dark Matter Candidates

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 4 Nov 2017

DARK MATTER. Martti Raidal NICPB & University of Helsinki Tvärminne summer school 1

A survey of recent dark matter direct detection results

Prospects for the Direct Detection of the Cosmic Neutrino Background

Dark Matter. Evidence for Dark Matter Dark Matter Candidates How to search for DM particles? Recent puzzling observations (PAMELA, ATIC, EGRET)

A cancellation mechanism for dark matter-nucleon interaction: non-abelian case

ATLAS Missing Energy Signatures and DM Effective Field Theories

In collaboration w/ G. Giudice, D. Kim, JCP, S. Shin arxiv: Jong-Chul Park. 2 nd IBS-KIAS Joint High1 January 08 (2018)

Neutrinos and DM (Galactic)

Global SUSY Fits with IceCube

Constraints on Light WIMPs from Isotropic Diffuse γ-ray Emission

OVERVIEW: Dark Matter

Dark Matter WIMP and SuperWIMP

LHC searches for dark matter.! Uli Haisch

Direct Detection of! sub-gev Dark Matter

Toward A Consistent Picture For CRESST, CoGeNT and DAMA. Chris Kelso Fermilab and University of Chicago Cosmology on the Beach Jan.

Thermalization time scales for WIMP capture by the Sun

Earth WIMP search with IceCube. Jan Kunnen for the IceCube Collaboration

DarkSUSY. Joakim Edsjö With Torsten Bringmann, Paolo Gondolo, Lars Bergström, Piero Ullio and Gintaras Duda. APS Meeting

Cosmological Production of Dark Matter

Enectalí Figueroa-Feliciano

Update on Dark Matter and Dark Forces

Non-Minimal Kaluza Klein Dark Matter

Searching for spectral features in the g-ray sky. Alejandro Ibarra Technische Universität München

Measurements of liquid xenon s response to low-energy particle interactions

Surprises in (Inelastic) Dark Matter

WIMP diffusion in the Solar System and the neutrino signal from the Sun and the Earth

Shedding light on Dark Matter from accelerator physics

Status of the ANAIS experiment at Canfranc

M. Lattanzi. 12 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Paris, 17 July 2009

MICROPHYSICS AND THE DARK UNIVERSE

NYU Nov 5, R isa Wechsler. The Dark Matter and Satellites in the Milky Way and its Twins

Dark Matter II. Marco Cirelli. (CNRS IPhT Saclay) December th TRR Winter School - Passo del Tonale. Reviews on Dark Matter: NewDark

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 6 Oct 2010

Gauged U(1) clockwork

Dark Matter Searches. Marijke Haffke University of Zürich

NEUTRINOS FROM KALUZA KLEIN DARK MATTER ANNIHILATIONS IN THE SUN

DUSEL NATIONAL LAB ROLE ESSENTIAL FOR SNOLAB AND DUSEL EXPERIMENTS SLUO

Indirect Dark Matter Detection

The Story of Wino Dark matter

The Sommerfeld Enhancement for Thermal Relic Dark Matter with an Excited State

DARK MATTER MEETS THE SUSY FLAVOR PROBLEM

Beyond Collisionless DM

Dark Matter. Marco Cirelli. (CNRS IPhT Saclay) December th TRR Winter School - Passo del Tonale. Reviews on Dark Matter: NewDark

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 30 Jun 2011

Chern-Simons portal Dark Matter

MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos

Probing the nature of Dark matter with radio astronomy. Céline Boehm

PHY326/426 Dark Matter and the Universe. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev F9b, Tel.:

Non-Standard Interaction of Solar Neutrinos in Dark Matter Detectors

Constraints on Darkon Scalar Dark Matter From Direct Experimental Searches

WIMP Recoil Rates and Exclusion Plots Brian, April 2007

CHANNELING IN DIRECT DARK MATTER DETECTION

Dark Matter from Non-Standard Cosmology

Measurement of 39 Ar in Underground Argon for Dark Matter Experiments

Prospects for indirect dark matter detection with Fermi and IACTs

Constraining Galactic dark matter in the Fermi-LAT sky with photon counts statistics

sub-gev Dark Matter Theory Tien-Tien Yu (University of Oregon)

Direct Detection of Dark Matter with LUX

EGRET Excess of diffuse Galactic Gamma Rays as a Trace of the Dark Matter Halo

Probing Dark Matter Long-lived Mediators with Solar

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 12 Oct 2011

Transcription:

A halo-independent lower bound on the DM capture rate in the Sun from a DD signal Juan Herrero-García Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm JCAP 1505 (2015) 05, 036, arxiv [hep-ph]: 1502.03342 In collaboration with M. Blennow, S. Clementz and T. Schwetz TAUP 2015, Torino, 10 th of September Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 1 / 20

Outline 1 Motivation 2 DD and capture rate in the Sun (C Sun ) 3 A halo-independent (HI) lower bound on C Sun 4 Numerical analysis 5 Summary and concluding remarks Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 2 / 20

Motivation Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 3 / 20

Motivation: derive a new HI framework for DD and capture Uncertainties on f(v), ρ are crucial on interpretation of DM signals. 1 Many studies: For DD [McCabe, Frandsen, Drees, Savage... ]. Talk by N. Bozorgnia. For C Sun [Bruch, Choi...]. 2 Also halo-independent (HI) methods: For DD: for fixed m χ, compare η(v m, t) (detector independent) in same v m range [Fox, Del Nobile, Bozorgnia, Feldstein, JHG...]. Talk by P. Gondolo. HI upper bounds from DD and Γ Sun [Ferrer...]. Talks by S. Wild. New HI framework to compare DD with ρ χ, LHC, Ω χ, and indirect detection [Blennow, JHG, Ferrer]. Talk by S. Vogl. Here new HI framework for comparing a positive DD signal with Γ Sun : We use that both the DD signal and C Sun depend on σ SI/SD. However, the velocities probed by both are very different. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 4 / 20

Direct detection and the capture rate in the Sun Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 5 / 20

Direct detection: there is a minimum velocity v m Goodman, Drukier, Freese... For elastic SI interactions the event rate can be expressed as where η(v m, t) C R(E R, t) = A 2 F 2 A(E R ) η(v m, t), v > v m by kinematics, with: v m dvv f det (v, t), with C ρ χσ SI/SD 2m χ µ 2 χp. ma E R v m =. 2µ 2 χa Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 6 / 20

Capture: there is a maximum velocity v cross (shown H, SD) For the DM to be captured there is a minimal and maximal E R : E min = m χ 2 v2, E max = 2µ2 χa m A (v 2 + u 2 esc(r)). These define the maximum velocity to be trapped: vcross(r) A 4mA m χ = m χ m A u esc(r) Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 7 / 20

A halo-independent lower bound on the DM capture rate in the Sun JCAP 1505 (2015) 05, 036, arxiv [hep-ph]: 1502.03342 Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 8 / 20

Overlap in velocity (H, SD) and assumptions of the bound Gould, Edsjo, Kavanagh, Blennow... Overlap in v thr < v < v A cross(r): DD is sensitive to v > v thr. Capture for v < v A cross(r). We can derive a lower bound on the capture, assuming: 1 We use that v e 29 km/s v m so that: f det (v) = f Sun (v + v e ) f Sun (v) f(v). 2 f(v), ρ χ constant so they are equal for the capture and for DD. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 9 / 20

A lower bound on the capture C Sun = 4π C A A 2 RS 0 v A drr 2 cross ρ A (r) dv f(v) v F A (v, r) 0 4π C A A 2 RS 0 v A drr 2 cross ρ A (r) dv f(v) v F A (v, r). v thr From a perfectly measured DD spectrum one can extract: C f(v) = 1 ( ) d R(ER ) va 2 dv FA 2(E R) The bound on C Sun can be expressed in terms of DD quantities. It is independent of f(v), v esc, σ SI/SD and ρ χ. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 10 / 20

Equilibrium between capture and annihilations in the Sun DM obeys (A Sun annihilation rate, no evaporation for m χ 3.5 GeV): dn dt = C Sun A Sun N 2. Equilibrium (dn/dt = 0) occurs for t eq t Sun 4.5 Gyr, where: C Sun t eq = 1 CSun A Sun ( 10 21 s 1 ) 1/2 ( 3 10 26 cm 3 s 1 ) 1/2 ( 100 GeV ) 3/4 0.5 Gyr, σv ann m χ where σv ann is the thermally-averaged annihilation cross section. For C Sun 10 21 s 1, no equilibrium reached if σv ann < σv fo. If it is reached Γ Sun given solely in terms of C Sun : Γ eq Sun = N 2 2 A Sun = C Sun 2. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 11 / 20

Numerical analysis Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 12 / 20

Comparison with the SHM Our bounds are strongest: For Xe in 20 m χ 1000 GeV (SD) and m χ 50 GeV (SI). Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 13 / 20

C Sun and upper bounds on BR for Xe mock signal Results: For xenon, for SD, annihilations into ν would be constrained to BR at the few % level. ττ, W W at the 10% level. Strong dependence on m χ. Stronger bounds at the wrong m χ. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 14 / 20

DAMA (already strongly disfavored HI by DD) Using HI bounds on modulation: A η (v m ) v e s α dη dv m [Schwetz, Zupan, JHG]. DAMA in strong tension: Na: for SI annihilation into νν, ττ (bb) are strongly constrained for m χ 5 (15) GeV, while SD is excluded for all channels. I: for SI, strong bounds for m χ 10, 35 GeV for νν, ττ. For SD m χ 40 (80) GeV excluded for νν, ττ (bb). Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 15 / 20

Unknown couplings to n and p, and uncertainties in SD FF The extracted f(v) depends on couplings to n and p, and FF: C f extr (v) = C f(v) A 2 true Ftrue(E 2 R ) A 2 wrong Fwrong(E 2 R ) η(v) ( d A 2 true F 2 ) true(e R ) v dv A 2 wrong Fwrong(E 2. R ) Isospin violation (IV), κ f n /f p : SD Xe (n) & F (p), κ a n /a p : CSun(κ) [s 1 ] 10 22 10 20 10 18 10 16 Silicon Xenon κ true = 1 κ true = 1 κ true = 0.7 2 1 0 1 2 κ Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 16 / 20

Preliminary: inelastic (m χ m χ = δ), self-interactions Blennow, Clementz, JHG: in preparation. Left) C Sun for inelastic scattering (solid) and bounds (dashed) δ (kev) black: 0, red: 25, blue: 50. Right) C Sun for inelastic self-interactions (solid) [no bounds possible] m χ (GeV) red: 10, green: 50, blue: 100, yellow: 500, black: 1000. CSun [s 1 ] 10 26 10 25 10 24 10 23 C self (δ)/c self (δ=0) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 10 22 10 100 1000 0 10 100 1000 m χ [GeV] δ [kev] Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 17 / 20

Summary and conclusions Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 18 / 20

Summary We derived a lower bound on C Sun in terms of a positive DD signal that is independent of f(v), v esc, σ SI/SD and ρ χ. We assumed f(v), ρ χ constant on t eq and equal in DD and C Sun. If equilibrium between capture-annihilations is reached (otherwise need σ ann ) one can derive upper bounds on BR from no ν signal. It is strong for SD and channels to νν, ττ and m χ 100 GeV. Extension to inelastic scattering, isospin-violation and self-interactions in preparation [Blennow, Clementz, JHG]. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 19 / 20

Concluding remarks: complementarity of the signals DD Γ Sun Lesson No No Keep trying... Axions? Eventually, does DM interact non-gravitationally? No Yes There is NO halo-independent lower bound on R from a ν signal Dark disk? [Bruch, Choi...] Self-interactions? [Zentner, JHG (in preparation)...] IV? Inelastic? [Nussinov, Menon, Shu, JHG (in preparation)...] Yes No HI upper bounds on BRs [this work]. SD dominated by neutrons? Asymmetric DM with suppressed Γ? [Kaplan, Nussinov...] p-wave suppressed σ ann? [Kappl...] Channels without ν (or not energetic enough)? IV? Inelastic? [Nussinov, Menon, Shu, JHG (in preparation)...] Yes Yes Check if the lower bounds here derived are fulfilled. If so, extract DM properties by a fit [Arina, Serpico, Kavanagh...]. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 20 / 20

Back-up slides Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 20 / 20

Capture rate in the Sun [Press, Griest, Gould, Bergstrom, Edsjo, Blennow...] The DM velocity inside the gravitational potential of the Sun w 2 = v 2 + u 2 esc(r), with u 2 esc(r) the escape velocity from the Sun. The capture rete is given by (notice that wdw = vdv) with C Sun = 4π ρ χ m χ A RS Ω A (w, r) = w ρ A m A 0 dr r 2 dv f(v) v w Ω A (w, r), 0 Emax(w) E min (w) where E R is the nuclear recoil energy. de R dσ A de R (w), If equilibrium between capture and annihilation is reached: Γ Sun = 1 2 C Sun Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 21 / 20

A lower bound on the capture C Sun 4π RS A 2 A 0 = 4π [ RS A 2 drr 2 ρ A (r) A 0 v A ( drr 2 cross ρ A (r) dv d η(v) ) F A (v, r) v thr dv v A cross ] η thr F A (v thr, r) + v thr dv η(v) F A(v, r), where in the last line we integrated by parts, with F A (v A cross, r) = 0. Features: Either the derivative or the function η(v), including its value at the threshold, have to be determined from DD. The bound is independent of the DM velocity distribution, the galactic escape velocity, the scattering cross section and the local DM density. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 22 / 20

Numerical examples We simulate mock data motivated by future experiments: Xenon, with σ SI = 10 45 cm 2 and σ SD = 2 10 40 cm 2. Assuming m χ = 100 GeV, for an exposure of 1 ton yr, about 154 (267) events in the range 5 45 kev for SI (SD) are predicted. Germanium, with E thr = 1 kev, focusing on low DM masses. Assuming m χ = 6 GeV and σ SI = 5 10 42 cm 2 and σ SD = 2 10 40 cm 2, 1.5 10 4 (2 3) events for SI (SD) predicted in the range 1 10 kev for an exposure of 100 kg yr with energy resolution of 30%. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 23 / 20

C Sun and BR assuming equilibrium (Γ Sun = C Sun /2) for Ge Results: For Ge, for both SD and SI direct annihilations into ν would be constrained to BR at the few % level. ττ are at wrong m χ. Strong dependence on m χ. Stronger bounds at the wrong m χ. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 24 / 20

Halo-independent bounds on annual modulation in DD Annual modulation [Freese et al]: Depending on the time of the year, we should receive more or less DM flux in our detectors. The annual modulation A η (v m ) can be constrained in terms of the constant rate η(v m ) (almost) halo-independently [JHG, Schwetz, Zupan], by expanding η(v, t) in v e /v 1, with v e 30 km/s. If there is a preferred direction in the DM velocity: A η (v m ) v e sin α halo dη dv m. Therefore there is also a lower bound on the capture for A η (v m ): C Sun 4π A RSun A 2 drr 2 ρ A (r) 0 v A cross v thr dv à η (v) sin α halo v e F A (v). Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 25 / 20

Expansion of η(v m, t) in v e /v v esc v > v m v e, so we can expand η(v m, t) to first order in v e : η(v m, t) = d 3 v f det( v) = d 3 v f Sun( v + v e (t)) = v m v v m v = d 3 v f Sun( v) v m v + d 3 v f Sun ( v) v v e(t) v 3 [Θ(v v m ) δ(v v m ) v m ] η(v m ) + A η (v m ) cos 2π(t t 0 ). η(v m ) is constant, A η is modulated, with observed rates: R CF 2 (E r ) η(v m ) and A R CF 2 (E r )A η Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 26 / 20

The general bound on the annual modulation 1 Halo smooth on v e 30 km/s. 2 Only time dependence in v e (t), not in f Sun (no change on months). [ vm2 dv m A η (v m ) v e η(v m1 ) + dv η(v) ] v m1 v v m1 3 If there is a constant ˆv HALO governing the modulation: where: vm2 in general sin α can be set to 1. v m1 dv m A η (v m ) sin α v e η(v m1 ) sin α 0.5 when ˆv HALO ˆv SUN (isotropic, SHM, DD...). And phase t 0 = June 2nd. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 27 / 20

DAMA results Na dominates for DM masses m χ 20 GeV. I is relevant for larger DM masses. Small overlap for I for H (SD). Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 28 / 20

Evidence for dark matter Rotation curves of spiral galaxies: Bullet cluster (X-rays + grav. lensing): CMB spectrum alone: Ω DE 0.69, Ω B 0.05, Ω DM 0.26 Combination of data from CMB, SN IA, BBN and clusters. M/L ratio in galaxy clusters (virial theorem to gas). Growth of structure (N-body simulations). Globular clusters in galaxies... Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 29 / 20

Properties of a DM particle (or particles) 1 Interacts gravitationally. 2 With the observed density (long-lived/ stable). 3 Neutral. 4 Cold (or warm), otherwise small scales would have been erased. 5 Collisionless: it does not dissipate, it forms haloes. We assume DM is a Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP): weak-scale cross-section with the SM. mass m χ O(1 10 3 ) GeV. which yield right relic abundance (WIMP miracle) and make DD possible. Juan Herrero-García (KTH) A HI lower bound on the DM capture rate TAUP, Torino, 10/09/2015 30 / 20