Finite-dimensional representations of free product C*-algebras

Similar documents
The second dual of a C*-algebra

A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis

Biholomorphic functions on dual of Banach Space

C* ALGEBRAS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS

Preliminaries on von Neumann algebras and operator spaces. Magdalena Musat University of Copenhagen. Copenhagen, January 25, 2010

Compact operators on Banach spaces

TOPOLOGICALLY FREE ACTIONS AND PURELY INFINITE C -CROSSED PRODUCTS

Normed Vector Spaces and Double Duals

Math 123 Homework Assignment #2 Due Monday, April 21, 2008

Unique ergodicity in C*-dynamical systems

INTRODUCTION TO C*-ALGEBRAS. Introduction Good references for the contents (and way beyond) are [Mur90, Ped79].

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

arxiv: v1 [math.kt] 31 Mar 2011

MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES SPECTRAL THEOREM

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: WEAK AND WEAK* CONVERGENCE

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015)

A direct proof of a result of Wassermann James Tener Subfactor Seminar April 16, 2010

V (v i + W i ) (v i + W i ) is path-connected and hence is connected.

ON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS

Problem Set 6: Solutions Math 201A: Fall a n x n,

Extensions of pure states

SEMICROSSED PRODUCTS OF THE DISK ALGEBRA

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.oa] 3 Jun 2003

Orthogonal Pure States in Operator Theory

RESTRICTED UNIFORM BOUNDEDNESS IN BANACH SPACES

Spectral theory for compact operators on Banach spaces

COMMUTATIVITY OF OPERATORS

Introduction to Bases in Banach Spaces

arxiv: v1 [math.oa] 13 Jul 2017

Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces

An introduction to some aspects of functional analysis

The following definition is fundamental.

von Neumann algebras, II 1 factors, and their subfactors V.S. Sunder (IMSc, Chennai)

CONTINUITY OF CP-SEMIGROUPS IN THE POINT-STRONG OPERATOR TOPOLOGY

Primitivity and unital full free product of residually finite dimensional C*-algebras

INF-SUP CONDITION FOR OPERATOR EQUATIONS

ON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTEGRABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Categories and Quantum Informatics: Hilbert spaces

Banach Spaces V: A Closer Look at the w- and the w -Topologies

Lecture 1 Operator spaces and their duality. David Blecher, University of Houston

CHAPTER VIII HILBERT SPACES

Hilbert spaces. 1. Cauchy-Schwarz-Bunyakowsky inequality

Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.

Lecture 5: Hodge theorem

Commutative Banach algebras 79

Where is matrix multiplication locally open?

Infinite-Dimensional Triangularization

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces

FURTHER STUDIES OF STRONGLY AMENABLE -REPRESENTATIONS OF LAU -ALGEBRAS

INTERMEDIATE BIMODULES FOR CROSSED PRODUCTS OF VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS

On positive maps in quantum information.

USING FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND SOBOLEV SPACES TO SOLVE POISSON S EQUATION

Operator Space Approximation Properties for Group C*-algebras

S. DUTTA AND T. S. S. R. K. RAO

PROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space

Extensions of Lipschitz functions and Grothendieck s bounded approximation property

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...

SYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS

Functional Analysis HW #1

A COMMENT ON FREE GROUP FACTORS

Free spaces and the approximation property

ORDERED INVOLUTIVE OPERATOR SPACES

Spectral Theory, with an Introduction to Operator Means. William L. Green

A NICE PROOF OF FARKAS LEMMA

Spectrally Bounded Operators on Simple C*-Algebras, II

Functional Analysis HW #5

Coarse geometry and quantum groups

MATH Linear Algebra

Inner product on B -algebras of operators on a free Banach space over the Levi-Civita field

Spectral theorems for bounded self-adjoint operators on a Hilbert space

I teach myself... Hilbert spaces

EQUIVALENCE OF TOPOLOGIES AND BOREL FIELDS FOR COUNTABLY-HILBERT SPACES

THE DUAL FORM OF THE APPROXIMATION PROPERTY FOR A BANACH SPACE AND A SUBSPACE. In memory of A. Pe lczyński

Real Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Elements of Functional Analysis

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

arxiv: v1 [math.oa] 22 Jan 2018

16 1 Basic Facts from Functional Analysis and Banach Lattices

Math 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems

Spectral isometries into commutative Banach algebras

On Some Local Operator Space Properties

Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem

Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday 10 February 2004 (Day 1)

A NOTE ON FAITHFUL TRACES ON A VON NEUMANN ALGEBRA

Decay to zero of matrix coefficients at Adjoint infinity by Scot Adams

Chapter 8 Integral Operators

Contents: 1. Minimization. 2. The theorem of Lions-Stampacchia for variational inequalities. 3. Γ -Convergence. 4. Duality mapping.

The weak topology of locally convex spaces and the weak-* topology of their duals

The Measure Problem. Louis de Branges Department of Mathematics Purdue University West Lafayette, IN , USA

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

SPECTRAL THEORY EVAN JENKINS

Exercise Solutions to Functional Analysis

THE CROSSED-PRODUCT OF A C*-ALGEBRA BY A SEMIGROUP OF ENDOMORPHISMS. Ruy Exel Florianópolis

Commutator estimates in the operator L p -spaces.

Lecture Notes on C -algebras. Ian F. Putnam

Part V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory

Patryk Pagacz. Characterization of strong stability of power-bounded operators. Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Transcription:

Finite-dimensional representations of free product C*-algebras Ruy Exel Terry A. Loring October 28, 2008 preliminary version Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 Abstract Our main theorem is a characterization of C*-algebras that have a separating family of finite-dimensional representations. This characterization makes possible a solution to a problem posed by Goodearl and Menaul. Specifically, we prove that the free product of such C*-algebras again has this property. 1 Introduction A C*-algebra is called residually finite-dimensional (RFD) if it has a separating family of finite-dimensional representations. Clearly a C*-algebra is residually finitedimensional if it is commutative or finite-dimensional. Also, this property is inherited by subalgebras. We show that a free product of residually finite-dimensional C*-algebras, possibly amalgamated over units, is residually finite-dimensional. Therefore, we have lots of new examples, such as Un nc, the noncommutative unitary groups. (This is a subalgebra of M n C C(S 1 ).) The first consideration of finite-dimensional representations of a free product was by Choi [1]. He starts with a faithful representation C(S 1 ) C C(S 1 ) B(H) partially supported by FAPESP of Brazil. On leave from the University of São Paulo partially supported by NSF grant DMS-9007347 1

determined by two unitaries U and V. (This free product is isomorphic to the group C*-algebra for the free group on two generators.) Choi shows that there is a sequence of finite-dimensional, unitaries U n and V n on subspaces of H converging star-strongly to U and V. This implies that U n and V n determine a separating sequence of finitedimensional representations. Goodearl and Menaul [4] extend Choi s result. For example, they consider free products of the form C(S 1 ) C C (G), where G is a finite group. Again, the starting point is a faithful representation C(S 1 ) C C (G) B(H). They show that given any representations of C(S 1 ) or C (G) on B(H), there is always a lift to a C*-algebra they call T (H). Therefore, the free product is seen to be a subalgebra of T (H). As we shall see in a moment, T (H) is RFD, so the free product is as well. Although they do not define it this way, T (H) may be seen to be isomorphic to the following C*-algebra. Suppose H is separable, with basis {e n }. Let p n denote the projection onto the first n basis vectors. Then T (H) consists of all bounded sequences (S n ) of operators on H such that p n S n p n = S n and the star-strong limit of (S n ) exists. The surjection onto B(H) sends (S n ) to lim n S n. Described this way, T (H) has a natural generalization. One replaces {p n } by any net of projections, on any Hilbert space, such that p λ I strongly. One then considers bounded nets (S λ ) that converge star-strongly and satisfy p λ S λ p λ = S λ. If all these projections are finite-dimensional then the resulting C*-algebra is RFD. However, we find it simpler to state our results, not as lifting problems to this algebra, but directly in terms of (a modified version of) Fell s topology [2, 3] on Rep(A, H). 2 RFD representations We begin by describing a topology on representations that is similar to Fell s topology [2, 3]. Definition 2.1 Let A be a C*-algebra and H a Hilbert space. We denote by Rep(A, H) the set of all (possibly degenerate) representations of A on H, equipped with the coarsest topology for which the maps are continuous for all a A and ξ H. π Rep(A, H) π(a)ξ H 2

The difference from Fell s topology is that, for a net π α to converge to π, we require that π α (a)ξ π(a)ξ for all vectors ξ, whereas in Fell s topology this is required only for vectors in the essential space of π. Definition 2.2 A representation π Rep(A, H) is called finite-dimensional if its essential space is finite-dimensional. We shall call π residually finite-dimensional (RFD) if π is in the closure, in Rep(A, H), of the set of finite-dimensional representations. Definition 2.3 A state f of A is said to be finite-dimensional if the GNS representation determined by f is finite-dimensional. We can now state our main theorem. Recall from the introduction that a C*-algebra is called residually finite-dimensional if it has a separating family of finite-dimensional representations. Theorem 2.4 Let A be a C*-algebra. The following are equivalent: (a) the finite-dimensional states form a dense subset of the state space S(A) (b) every cyclic representation of A is residually finite-dimensional (c) every representation of A is residually finite-dimensional (d) A admits a faithful residually finite-dimensional representation (e) A is residually finite-dimensional Before we embark on the proof, we present two lemmas. The first is a reworking of an idea from [2]. Lemma 2.5 Let H be a Hilbert space and (H α ) α Λ be a family of Hilbert spaces indexed by a directed set Λ. Suppose we are given vectors ξ 1,..., ξ n in H and that for each α Λ we choose vectors ξ α 1,..., ξ α n in H α such that lim α ξα i, ξj α = ξ i, ξ j for i, j = 1,..., n. Then there is an α 0 Λ and, for each α α 0, there is an isometry u α from the subspace H 0 of H spanned by {ξ 1,..., ξ n } into H α such that for i = 1,..., n. lim u α(ξ i ) ξ α α i = 0 3

Proof. Let v : C n H 0 be the linear map sending each e i, the ith vector of the canonical basis of C n, to ξ i. Since v is surjective we can choose a right inverse w to v. For each α Λ, let v α : C n H α be given by v α (e i ) = ξ α i, for i = 1,..., n. Observe that v αv α, viewed as an element of M n (C), converges to v v since, for all i and j, lim α v αv α (e i ), e i = lim ξ α α i, ξj α = ξ i, ξ j = v v(e i ), e j. Thus, if we let u α : H 0 H α be defined by u α = v α w, we have that lim α u α u α = lim w v α αv α w = w v vw = id H0. Therefore, we can find α 0 such that, for α α 0, u α u α is invertible. For all such α, set We then have, for i = 1,..., n, u α = u α(u α u α) 1/2. lim α u αξ i ξi α 2 = α lim u α u αξ i, ξ i 2Re vαv α wξ i, e i + ξi α, ξi α = 2 ξ i, ξ i 2 v vwξ i, e i = 0. From this, it follows easily that lim u αξ i ξ α α i = 0. Lemma 2.6 Suppose that π is a cyclic representation of A on H, with cyclic vector ξ, and (π γ ) γ Γ is a net in Rep(A, H). If lim π γ(a)ξ = π(a)ξ γ for all a A, then π γ converges to π in rep(a, H). Proof. Notice that if b A and η = π(b)ξ we have π γ (a)η π(a)η π γ (a)π(b)ξ π γ (a)π γ (b)ξ + π γ (ab)ξ π(ab)ξ a π(b)ξ π γ (b)ξ + π γ (ab)ξ π(ab)ξ which shows that π γ (a) converges to π(a) pointwise over the dense set {η H : η = π(b)ξ, b A} 4

The uniform boundedness of {π γ (a) a A} then tells us that π γ (a) converges strongly to π(a) for all a. We now give the proof of Theorem 2.4. (a b) First, we assume A to be unital. Let π be a cyclic representation of A on H with cyclic vector ξ and state f. By assumption, there is a net (f α ) of finite-dimensional states converging to f and let (ρ α, H α, ξ α ) be the corresponding GNS representations. Given a finite set {a 0, a 1,..., a n } of elements of A, in which a 0 = 1, observe that lim ρ α(a i )ξ α, ρ α (a j )ξ α = π(a i )ξ, π(a j )ξ α for all i, j = 1,..., n. By Lemma 2.5, there exists a net (u α ) α α0 H 0 = span{π(a i )ξ i = 0,..., n} of isometries from into H α such that lim u απ(a i )ξ ρ α (a i )ξ α = 0. (1) α Assuming the non-trivial case of H infinite-dimensional, we may extend each u α to a co-isometry onto the finite-dimensional space H α. Let π α be the (degenerate) representation of A on H given by We claim that for all i we have π α (a) = u αρ α (a)u α. lim π α(a i )ξ = π(a i )ξ. (2) α First, by taking i = 0 in (1) we obtain lim u α ξ ξ α = 0. Therefore, π α (a i )ξ π(a i )ξ = u αρ α (a i )u α ξ u αu α π(a i )ξ ρ α (a i )u α ξ u α π(a i )ξ ρ α (a i )u α ξ ρ α (a i )ξ α + ρ α (a i )ξ α u α π(a i )ξ a i u α ξ ξ α + ρ α (a i )ξ α u α π(a i )ξ, from which (2) follows. Denote the set {a 0, a 1,..., a n } by β. For each such β and for each ɛ > 0, choose, from among the π α, a π ɛ,β such that π ɛ,β (a i )ξ π(a i )ξ < ɛ. We thus obtain a net (π ɛ,β ) of finite-dimensional representations such that, for all a A, lim π ɛ,β (a)ξ = π(a)ξ. 5

By Lemma 2.6, this converges to π as a net in Rep(A, H). In the case that A lacks a unit, let à be the unitization of A. The natural inclusion S(A) S(Ã) preserves finite-dimensional states so that, if (a) holds for A, it will also hold for Ã. Our previous work shows that (b) holds for Ã, and hence also for A. (b c) Given an arbitrary representation π of A on a Hilbert space H, write π = λ Λ π λ where each π λ is a cyclic subrepresentation of π. For each finite subset F Λ, we let π F = λ F π λ, viewed as a degenerate representation on H. It is clear that the net so obtained converges to π. A simple argument now shows that each π F is RFD, and hence so is π. (c d) This is obvious. (d e) Let π be a faithful RFD representation of A, so that π = lim π α where each π α is finite-dimensional. If a A is nonzero, then π(a) 0. But since π α (a) converges strongly to π(a), some π α (a) must be nonzero. (e a) We assume A has a unit, since the non-unital case follows easily from the unital case. Denote by F (A) the set of finite-dimensional states of A. It is a simple matter to verify that F (A) is a convex subset of S(A). In fact, if f and g are in F (A) then the GNS representation of a convex combination h = (1 t)f + tg is equivalent to a sub-representation of the direct sum of the GNS representations for f and g. Arguing by contradiction, assume g is in S(A) but not in the weak*-closure of F (A). Identify the dual of A h, the set of self-adjoint continuous linear functionals on A with the weak* topology, and A h, the set of self-adjoint elements of A. Now use the Hahn-Banach theorem to obtain an element a in A h and a real number r such that g(a) > r and f(a) r for all f in F (A). This implies that for any finite-dimensional representation π of A and any unit vector ξ, in the space of π, one has π(a)ξ, ξ r. Therefore π(a) r and, since the direct sum of all finite-dimensional representations of A is a faithful representation, by hypothesis, we have a r. The fact that g(a) > r is then a contradiction. 6

3 Free products In this section, we give a complete solution to [4, Problem 2.4]. Specifically, we characterize the free product C*-algebras that are residually finite-dimensional. Our strategy begins with a faithful representation A B π B(H). If A and B are RFD, then π A and π B can be approximated by nets of finitedimensional representations. Unfortunately, these will live on different nets of subspaces. To remedy this, we will use the following lemma to increase the essential subspaces for the representations in both nets to accommodate each other. Lemma 3.1 Let π be a non-degenerate representation of a C*-algebra A on the Hilbert space H and suppose that π α is a net in Rep(A, H) that converges to π. If ρ α is another net (on the same directed set) in Rep(A, H) such that the restriction of each ρ α (a) to the essential space H α of π α coincides with π α (a) then ρ α also converges to π. Proof. Let p α denote the orthogonal projection onto H α. We claim that p α converges strongly to the identity operator (c.f. [3, page 239]). In fact, for ξ H, a A and all α we have π(a)ξ p α (π(a)ξ) = dist(π(a)ξ, H α ) π(a)ξ p α (π α (a)ξ) = π(a)ξ π α (a)ξ showing that p α converges pointwise to the indentity over the dense set {π(a)ξ a A, ξ H}. Since (p α ) α is uniformly bounded the claim is proven. Observing that ρ α (a)p α = π α (a), for a in A and ξ in H, we have ρ α (a)ξ π(a)ξ ρ α (a)ξ ρ α (a)p α ξ + π α (a)ξ π(a)ξ a ξ p α ξ + π α (a)ξ π(a)ξ from which we see that ρ α (a)ξ converges to π(a)ξ and hence the conslusion. Theorem 3.2 Let A 1 and A 2 be C*-algebras. Then A 1 A 2 is RFD if and only if A 1 and A 2 are RFD. If both A 1 and A 2 are unital, then A 1 C A 2 is RFD if and only if A 1 and A 2 are RFD. Proof. The RFD property clearly passes to subalgebras, so both forward implications are trivial. 7

To prove the reverse implication in the unital case, let π be a faithful non-degenerate representation of A 1 C A 2 on a Hilbert space H. For i = 1, 2 let π i be the restriction of π to A i and take a net (πα) i α in Rep(A, H) of finite dimensional-representations converging to π i. (We are justified in using a common directed set, as in general we may replace both directed sets by their product.) Let Hα i be the essential space of πα. i For each α, choose a finite-dimensional subspace K α of H containing both Hα 1 and Hα 2 with dimension a common multiple of dim(hα) 1 and dim(hα). 2 Let ρ i α be any representation of A i with K α as its essential subspace which restricts to πα i on Hα. i For example, one may take an appropriate multiple of πα. i Both π 1 and π 2 are unital, and so nondegenerate. Using Lemma 3.1 we thus obtain lim α ρ i α = π α. For each α, let ρ α = ρ 1 α ρ 2 α which is a well-defined, finite-dimensional representation of A 1 C A 2 since ρ 1 α(1) and ρ 2 α(1) are both equal to the orthogonal projection onto K α. It now follows that lim α ρ α = π which proves that π, and hence A 1 C A 2, is RFD. The proof of the non-unital case is similar, but simpler. As before, take a faithful representation of A 1 A 2 on H. Let π i be the restriction of π to A i and write π i = lim α πα. i If one sets π α = π1 α π2 α then (π α ) α converges to π. This completes the proof. References [1] M. D. Choi, The full C*-algebra of the free group on two generators, Pacific J. Math. 87(1980), 41-48. [2] J. M. G. Fell, C*-algebras with smooth dual, Illinois J. Math. 4(1960). [3] J. M. G. Fell, Weak containment and induced representations of Groups, Canad. J. Math. 14(1962), 237-268. [4] K. R. Goodearl and P. Menal, Free and residually finite-dimensional C*-algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 90(1990), 391-410. 8