A Bernstein polynomial approach for solution of nonlinear integral equations

Similar documents
New Expansion and Infinite Series

An iterative method for solving nonlinear functional equations

Research Article On Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions of a Nonlinear Integral Equation

A Modified ADM for Solving Systems of Linear Fredholm Integral Equations of the Second Kind

Numerical Analysis: Trapezoidal and Simpson s Rule

AN INTEGRAL INEQUALITY FOR CONVEX FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS IN NUMERICAL INTEGRATION

The Riemann Integral

Review of Calculus, cont d

Lecture 14: Quadrature

Lecture 19: Continuous Least Squares Approximation

Keywords : Generalized Ostrowski s inequality, generalized midpoint inequality, Taylor s formula.

NUMERICAL INTEGRATION. The inverse process to differentiation in calculus is integration. Mathematically, integration is represented by.

Discrete Least-squares Approximations

Some estimates on the Hermite-Hadamard inequality through quasi-convex functions

Numerical Integration

An optimal 3-point quadrature formula of closed type and error bounds

Orthogonal Polynomials and Least-Squares Approximations to Functions

CAAM 453 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS I Examination There are four questions, plus a bonus. Do not look at them until you begin the exam.

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Exam 2, Mathematics 4701, Section ETY6 6:05 pm 7:40 pm, March 31, 2016, IH-1105 Instructor: Attila Máté 1

Arithmetic Mean Derivative Based Midpoint Rule

ODE: Existence and Uniqueness of a Solution

arxiv: v1 [math.na] 23 Apr 2018

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 55 (130) (2005), , Abbotsford. 1. Introduction

ON BERNOULLI BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM

New Integral Inequalities for n-time Differentiable Functions with Applications for pdfs

THE EXISTENCE-UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR FIRST-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

Euler, Ioachimescu and the trapezium rule. G.J.O. Jameson (Math. Gazette 96 (2012), )

On the Decomposition Method for System of Linear Fredholm Integral Equations of the Second Kind

A Numerical Method for Solving Nonlinear Integral Equations

p(x) = 3x 3 + x n 3 k=0 so the right hand side of the equality we have to show is obtained for r = b 0, s = b 1 and 2n 3 b k x k, q 2n 3 (x) =

Math& 152 Section Integration by Parts

Modification Adomian Decomposition Method for solving Seventh OrderIntegro-Differential Equations

63. Representation of functions as power series Consider a power series. ( 1) n x 2n for all 1 < x < 1

New Integral Inequalities of the Type of Hermite-Hadamard Through Quasi Convexity

B.Sc. in Mathematics (Ordinary)

New implementation of reproducing kernel Hilbert space method for solving a class of functional integral equations

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004

MAC-solutions of the nonexistent solutions of mathematical physics

Physics 116C Solution of inhomogeneous ordinary differential equations using Green s functions

Fredholm Integral Equations of the First Kind Solved by Using the Homotopy Perturbation Method

Composite Mendeleev s Quadratures for Solving a Linear Fredholm Integral Equation of The Second Kind

LYAPUNOV-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR NONLINEAR SYSTEMS INVOLVING THE (p 1, p 2,..., p n )-LAPLACIAN

Calculus II: Integrations and Series

Orthogonal Polynomials

Research Article Numerical Treatment of Singularly Perturbed Two-Point Boundary Value Problems by Using Differential Transformation Method

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SINGULAR THREE-POINT BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEMS

3.4 Numerical integration

CLOSED EXPRESSIONS FOR COEFFICIENTS IN WEIGHTED NEWTON-COTES QUADRATURES

Research Article On New Inequalities via Riemann-Liouville Fractional Integration

Undergraduate Research

Taylor Polynomial Inequalities

Chapter 3 Solving Nonlinear Equations

Multiple Positive Solutions for the System of Higher Order Two-Point Boundary Value Problems on Time Scales

Jim Lambers MAT 169 Fall Semester Lecture 4 Notes

P 3 (x) = f(0) + f (0)x + f (0) 2. x 2 + f (0) . In the problem set, you are asked to show, in general, the n th order term is a n = f (n) (0)

Lecture 6: Singular Integrals, Open Quadrature rules, and Gauss Quadrature

Numerical Solutions for Quadratic Integro-Differential Equations of Fractional Orders

Construction of Gauss Quadrature Rules

Analytical Approximate Solution of Carleman s Equation by Using Maclaurin Series

Harmonic Mean Derivative - Based Closed Newton Cotes Quadrature

f (a) + f (b) f (λx + (1 λ)y) max {f (x),f (y)}, x, y [a, b]. (1.1)

Numerical Methods I Orthogonal Polynomials

1.2. Linear Variable Coefficient Equations. y + b "! = a y + b " Remark: The case b = 0 and a non-constant can be solved with the same idea as above.

Section 6.1 INTRO to LAPLACE TRANSFORMS

AN INEQUALITY OF OSTROWSKI TYPE AND ITS APPLICATIONS FOR SIMPSON S RULE AND SPECIAL MEANS. I. Fedotov and S. S. Dragomir

An inequality related to η-convex functions (II)

A unified generalization of perturbed mid-point and trapezoid inequalities and asymptotic expressions for its error term

Best Approximation. Chapter The General Case

An improvement to the homotopy perturbation method for solving integro-differential equations

Z b. f(x)dx. Yet in the above two cases we know what f(x) is. Sometimes, engineers want to calculate an area by computing I, but...

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Part IB Numerical Analysis

The final exam will take place on Friday May 11th from 8am 11am in Evans room 60.

1. Gauss-Jacobi quadrature and Legendre polynomials. p(t)w(t)dt, p {p(x 0 ),...p(x n )} p(t)w(t)dt = w k p(x k ),

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Improvement of Ostrowski Integral Type Inequalities with Application

The Hadamard s inequality for quasi-convex functions via fractional integrals

Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics AA215A Lecture 3 Polynomial Interpolation: Numerical Differentiation and Integration.

Lecture 4: Piecewise Cubic Interpolation

NUMERICAL INTEGRATION

Best Approximation in the 2-norm

Exact solutions for nonlinear partial fractional differential equations

A Computational Method for Solving Linear Volterra Integral Equations

Math 270A: Numerical Linear Algebra

ON THE GENERALIZED SUPERSTABILITY OF nth ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH INITIAL CONDITIONS

Lecture 1. Functional series. Pointwise and uniform convergence.

LYAPUNOV-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR THIRD-ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

CMDA 4604: Intermediate Topics in Mathematical Modeling Lecture 19: Interpolation and Quadrature

MAT 772: Numerical Analysis. James V. Lambers

Definite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU

Riemann Sums and Riemann Integrals

Matrices, Moments and Quadrature, cont d

A Nonclassical Collocation Method For Solving Two-Point Boundary Value Problems Over Infinite Intervals

Ordinary Differential Equations- Boundary Value Problem

Communications inmathematicalanalysis Volume 6, Number 2, pp (2009) ISSN

Main topics for the First Midterm

MATH34032: Green s Functions, Integral Equations and the Calculus of Variations 1

Some inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for n times differentiable (ρ, m) geometrically convex functions

Transcription:

Avilble online t wwwisr-publictionscom/jns J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 Reserch Article Journl Homepge: wwwtjnscom - wwwisr-publictionscom/jns A Bernstein polynomil pproch for solution of nonliner integrl equtions Neşe İşler Acr, Ayşegül Dşcıoğlu b, Deprtment of Mthemtics, Fculty of Arts nd Sciences, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey b Deprtment of Mthemtics, Fculty of Arts nd Sciences, Pmukkle University, Denizli, Turkey Communicted by A Atngn Abstrct In this study, colloction method bsed on the generlized Bernstein polynomils is derivted for solving nonliner Fredholm-Volterr integrl equtions (FVIEs) in the most generl form vi the qusilineriztion technique Moreover, qudrtic convergence nd error estimte of the proposed method is nlyzed Some exmples re lso presented to show the ccurcy nd pplicbility of the method c 2017 All rights reserved Keywords: Bernstein polynomil pproch, nonliner integrl equtions, qusilineriztion technique, colloction method 2010 MSC: 45A05, 45G10, 65L60 1 Introduction Fredholm nd Volterr integrl equtions re well-known tht liner nd nonliner integrl equtions rise in mny scientific fields such s the popultion dynmics, spred of epidemics nd semi-conductor devices The principl investigtors of the theory of these equtions re Vit Volterr (1860-1940) nd Ivr Fredholm (1866-1927) Qusilineriztion pioneered by Bellmn nd Klb [6] is n effective technique tht solves the nonliner equtions itertively by sequence of liner equtions Since this method is generliztion of the Newton-Rphson method, it cn be introduced by using the Tylor series expnsion The min dvntge of this method is tht it converges qudrticlly to the solution of the originl eqution Some systemtic studies of this property hve been given in [1, 5 7, 11, 13 15, 18] This method is lso powerful tool to obtin the pproximte solution of nonliner problems included such s differentil equtions [1, 3, 5, 9, 14, 17], functionl differentil equtions [2, 7], integrl equtions [13, 15] nd integro-differentil equtions [4, 18] The Bernstein polynomils nd their bsis forms defined on the intervl [0, 1] cn be generlized to the intervl [, b] by considering trnsformtion t = x b s follows Corresponding uthor Emil ddresses: nisler@mehmetkifedutr (Neşe İşler Acr), kyuz@puedutr (Ayşegül Dşcıoğlu) doi:1022436/jns0100907 Received 2017-06-23

N İşler Acr, A Dşcıoğlu, J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 4639 Definition 11 The generlized Bernstein bsis polynomils cn be defined on [, b] by ( ) 1 n p i,n (x) = (b ) n (x ) i (b x) n i, i = 0, 1,, n i Definition 12 Let y be continuous function on the intervl [, b] The generlized Bernstein polynomils of n-th-degree tht liner combintion of the generlized Bernstein bsis polynomils p i,n (x) re defined by B n (y; x) = n i=0 ( y + ) (b ) i p i,n (x) n Besides, the generlized Bernstein polynomils nd their bsis forms hve some useful properties such s the positivity, continuity, recursion s reltion, symmetry, unity prtition of the bsis set over the intervl [, b], uniform pproximtion, differentibility nd integrbility These properties cn be shown esily by following the some studies given with the properties of the Bernstein polynomils nd their bsis forms [8, 10, 12] Theorem 13 If y (x) is continuous function on the intervl [, b], then lim n B n (y; x) = y (x) converges uniformly Proof The bove theorem is proved with the similr wys given for the proof of theorem presented by Phillips [16] Definition 14 Nonliner Fredholm-Volterr integrl eqution is defined s follows: g (x, y(x)) = λ 1 f(x, t, y(t))dt + λ 2 v (x, t, y(t)) dt, x, t [, b], (11) where λ 1 nd λ 2 re constnts, y(x) is n unknown function, g : [, b] R, the kernels f : [, b] [, b] R nd v : [, b] [, b] R re continuous functions stisfying Lipschitz condition with respect to the lst vribles: such tht L g, L f, L v 0 for x, t [, b] nd w, z R g (x, z) g(x, w) L g z w, f (x, t, z) f(x, t, w) L f z w, v (x, t, z) v(x, t, w) L v z w, The reminder of this pper follows: In Section 2, colloction method is developed itertively to get the numericl solution of the nonliner integrl equtions by mens of the generlized Bernstein polynomils nd qusilineriztion technique In Section 3, the uniqueness of the nonliner Fredholm- Volterr integrl equtions is nlyzed, nd the error estimtes of the proposed method re given In Section 4, some nonliner exmples re considered for showing the pplicbility nd efficiency of the method Numericl results re lso compred with different methods Finlly, some inferences of the study re mentioned in the lst section 2 Method of solution In this pper, the purpose is to pproximte the solution of nonliner FVIE (11) by using the qusilineriztion technique itertively with the generlized Bernstein polynomils: y (x) = B n (y; x) = n i=0 ( y + ) (b )i p i,n (x) (21) n

N İşler Acr, A Dşcıoğlu, J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 4640 Theorem 21 Let x s [, b] be colloction point, y C [, b], g, f nd v hve Tylor series expnsion with respect to y Then, nonliner FVIE (11) hs the following itertion mtrix form: [G r P λ 1 F r λ 2 V r ] Y r+1 = H r, r = 0, 1, (22) Here mtrices G r = dig ( [g (x s, y r (x )] s ))], P = [p i,n (x s )], F r = [F r,s,i ] nd V r = [V r,s,i ] re (n + 1) (n + 1) mtrices, Y r+1 = [y r+1 + (b )i n nd H r = [h r (x s )] re (n + 1) 1 mtrices for i, s = 0, 1,, n Besides, elements of these mtrices re defined s h r (x) = g y (x, y r (x)) y r (x) g (x, y r (x)) + λ 1 [f(x, t, y r (t)) f y (x, t, y r (t)) y r (t)] dt + λ 2 [v (x, t, y r (t)) v y (x, t, y r (t)) y r (t)] dt, F r,s,i = f (x, t, y r (t)) p i,n (t)dt, V r,s,i = v (x, t, y r (t)) p i,n (t)dt Proof Since functions g, f nd v re ble to be expnded by Tylor series with respect to y, nonliner FVIE cn be expressed s sequence of liner integrl equtions by using qusilineriztion technique for r = 0, 1, s follows g y (x, y r (x)) y r+1 (x) = g y (x, y r (x)) y r (x) g (x, y r (x)) + λ 1 [f (x, t, y r (t)) + f y (x, t, y r (t)) (y r+1 (t) y r (t))] dt + λ 2 [v (x, t, y r (t)) + v y (x, t, y r (t)) (y r+1 (t) y r (t))] dt Here g y, f y nd v y re prtil derivtives of g, f nd v with respect to function y, y 0 (x) is n initil pproximtion function, y r (x) is lwys known function nd y r+1 (x) is obtined by the former one By considering function h r (x) given in the expression of Theorem 21, the eqution (23) cn be rerrnged shortly g y (x, y r (x)) y r+1 (x) = h r (x) + λ 1 f y (x, t, y r (t)) y r+1 (t) dt + λ 2 v y (x, t, y r (t)) y r+1 (t) dt (24) Since (11) hs the generlized Bernstein polynomil solution nd y(x s ) = B n (y; x s ) (s = 0, 1,, n) from the colloction method, the expression (21) cn be written s (23) y r+1 (x s ) = P(x s )Y r+1, r = 0, 1, (25) Substituting the colloction points nd reltion (25) into (24), we obtin the liner lgebric system g y (x s, y r (x s )) P(x s )Y r+1 λ 1 F r (x s )Y r+1 λ 2 V r (x s ) Y r+1 = h r (x s ) (26) Here F r (x s ) nd V r (x s ) re denoted by F r (x s ) = f y (x, t, y r (t)) P (t) dt = [ ] F r,s,0 F r,s,1 F r,s,n,

N İşler Acr, A Dşcıoğlu, J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 4641 V r (x s ) = v y (x, t, y r (t)) P (t) dt = [ ] V r,s,0 V r,s,1 V r,s,n F r = Considering the mtrices g y (x 0, y r (x 0 )) 0 0 0 g y (x 1, y r (x 1 )) 0 G r =, 0 0 g y (x n, y r (x n )) F r (x 0 ) V r (x 0 ) h r (x 0 ) F r (x 1 ) V r (x 1 ) h r (x 1 ) F r (x n ), V r= V r (x n ), H r = h r (x n ) for s = 0, 1,, n, the eqution (26) cn be written s mtrix form (22) This completes the proof Let the following steps be given to solve the nonliner FVIE (11) Step 1 The eqution (22) cn lso be written in the compct form W r Y r+1 = H r or [W r ; H r ], r = 0, 1,, so tht W r = G r P λ 1 F r λ 2 V r This eqution corresponds to liner lgebric eqution system with y r+1 unknown coefficients for itertions r Step 2 An initil pproximtion function y 0 (x) should be selected for computing the W r nd H r This function cn be determined s source or constnt function roughly Step 3 Since nonliner integrl equtions reduce to sequence of liner integrl equtions vi the qusilineriztion technique, we do not need to use ny solution techniques of nonliner integrl equtions As liner eqution system, if rnk (W r ) = rnk (W r ; H r ) = n + 1, then solution of this system is uniquely determined The system cn lso be solved by the Guss elimintion, generlized inverse, LU nd QR fctoriztion methods 3 Convergence nd error nlysis Definition 31 Error is denoted by e n (x) = y(x) y r+1 (x) such tht y(x) is n exct solution nd y r+1 (x) = B n (y r+1 ; x) is generlized Bernstein pproximte solution Then bsolute nd men errors cn be numericlly computed t the colloction points respectively by e n (x s ) = y (x s ) y r+1 (x s ), e men = 1 n+1, n e n (x s ) Definition 32 Let E r (x s ) = y r+1 (x s ) y r (x s ) be error on the colloction points x s [, b] for the r-th itertion function Then bsolute nd mximum errors cn be expressed s follows: s=0 E r (x s ) = y r+1 (x s ) y r (x s ), nd E mx = mx x s [,b] E r (x s ) ( Theorem 33 (Uniqueness Theorem) Let g C [, b] nd f, v C [, b] 2) stisfy the Lipschitz condition with respect to the lst vribles nd T : C [, b] C [, b] be mpping where Ty (x) = g (x, y (x)) λ 1 f(x, t, y(t))dt λ 2 v (x, t, y(t)) dt Then (11) hs unique solution whenever 0 < α < 1, α = L g + (b ) [ λ 1 L f + λ 2 L v ]

N İşler Acr, A Dşcıoğlu, J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 4642 Proof Since g, f nd v stisfy the Lipschitz condition with respect to the lst vribles y nd y, we hve the following inequlity for y, y C [, b]: Ty (x) Ty (x) g (x, y (x)) g (x, y (x)) + λ 1 f(x, t, y(t)) f(x, t, y (t)) dt + λ 2 v (x, t, y(t)) v (x, t, y (t)) dt L g y (x) y (x) + λ 1 L f y (t) y (t) dt + λ 2 L v y (t) y (t) dt Considering the definition of mximum norm for one vrible function, the inequlity becomes Ty Ty L g y y + λ 1 L f y y dt + λ 2 L v y y dt L g y y + λ 1 L f (b ) y y + λ 2 L v (b ) y y [L g + (b ) ( λ 1 L f + λ 2 L v )] y y for ll x, t [, b] Denoting α = L g + (b ) [ λ 1 L f + λ 2 L v ], the inequlity is Ty Ty α y y Under the condition 0 < α < 1, by Bnch fixed-point theorem, (11) hs unique solution nd this completes the proof Theorem 34 Suppose tht y 0 (x) nd y r (x) re the first nd r-th itertion functions, g C 2 [, b], f nd v C 2 ([, b] 2) Then the following qudrtic convergence nd error estimte hold E r σ E r 1 2 nd E r (σ E 1 ) 2r σ such tht σ = M 2+(b )[ λ 1 L 1 + λ 2 L 2 ] 2[M 1 (b )( λ 1 K 1 + λ 2 K 2 )] positive constnt If the quntity E 1 < 1, then lim r E r = 0 Proof Applying the qusilineriztion technique to the following equlity we hve g (x, y r+1 ) g (x, y r ) = λ 1 {f (x, t, y r+1 ) f (x, t, y r )} dt + λ 2 {v (x, t, y r+1 ) v (x, t, y r )} dt, g y (x, y r ) (y r+1 y r ) = {g (x, y r ) g (x, y r 1 ) g y (x, y r 1 ) (y r y r 1 )} + λ 1 {f (x, t, y r ) f (x, t, y r 1 ) f y (x, t, y r 1 ) (y r y r 1 )} dt + λ 2 {v (x, t, y r ) v (x, t, y r 1 ) v y (x, t, y r 1 ) (y r y r 1 )} dt + λ 1 f y (x, t, y r ) (y r+1 y r ) dt + +λ 2 v y (x, t, y r ) (y r+1 y r ) dt (31) Since g C 2 [, b], f nd v C 2 ([, b] 2), the following equtions cn be written from men vlue theorem

N İşler Acr, A Dşcıoğlu, J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 4643 g (x, y r ) g (x, y r 1 ) g y (x, y r 1 ) (y r y r 1 ) = 1 2 (y r y r 1 ) 2 g yy (x, α), f (x, t, y r ) f (x, t, y r 1 ) f y (x, t, y r 1 ) (y r y r 1 ) = 1 2 (y r y r 1 ) 2 f yy (x, t, β), v (x, t, y r ) v (x, t, y r 1 ) v y (x, t, y r 1 ) (y r y r 1 ) = 1 2 (y r y r 1 ) 2 v yy (x, t, γ), where y r 1 < α, β, γ < y r Substituting these equtions into (31), the eqution becomes g y (x, y r ) (y r+1 y r ) = 1 2 (y r y r 1 ) 2 g yy (x, α) + λ 1 + λ 2 1 2 (y r y r 1 ) 2 v yy (x, t, γ) dt + λ 1 + λ 2 v y (x, t, y r ) (y r+1 y r ) dt 1 2 (y r y r 1 ) 2 f yy (x, t, β) dt f y (x, t, y r ) (y r+1 y r ) dt By definition of the mximum norm for one nd two vribles functions, the following inequlity is obtined g y y r+1 y r 1 2 y r y r 1 2 g yy + 1 2 λ 1 y r y r 1 2 f yy (b ) + 1 2 λ 2 y r y r 1 2 v yy (b ) + λ 1 f y y r+1 y r (b ) + λ 2 v y y r+1 y r (b ) Denoting nd the bove inequlity becomes g y = mx g y (x, y r (x)) = M 1, x [,b] g yy = mx g yy (x, α (x)) = M 2, x [,b] f y = v y = f yy = v yy = mx f y (x, t, y r ) = K 1, x,t [,b] mx v y (x, t, y r ) = K 2, x,t [,b] mx f yy (x, t, z) = L 1, x,t [,b] mx v yy (x, t, ) = L 2, x,t [,b] mx (x ) = b, x [,b] M 1 y r+1 y r M 2 2 y r y r 1 2 + L 1 2 λ 1 (b ) y r y r 1 2 + L 2 2 λ 2 (b ) y r y r 1 2 + λ 1 K 1 (b ) y r+1 y r + λ 2 K 2 (b ) y r+1 y r This inequlity cn be rerrnged s { } M2 + λ 1 L 1 (b ) + λ 2 L 2 (b ) E r E r 1 2 2 [M 1 λ 1 K 1 (b ) λ 2 K 2 (b )],

N İşler Acr, A Dşcıoğlu, J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 4644 E r σ E r 1 2, M 2+ λ 1 L 1 (b )+ λ 2 L 2 (b ) 2[M 1 λ 1 K 1 (b ) λ 2 K 2 (b )] where σ = positive constnt This eqution shows tht convergence is qudrtic if there is convergence t ll We rewrite this eqution s By the use of substitutions, the new inequlity is E r σ E r 1 2, E r 1 σ E r 2 2, E 2 σ E 1 2 ) 2 [ ] E r σ E r 1 2 (σ σ E r 2 2 σ σ 2r 2 E r 3 2r = [σ E 1 ] 2r /σ If the quntity σ E 1 < 1, then lim r E r = 0 It completes the proof 4 Numericl results Two exmples including nonliner integrl equtions re considered for nlyzing the pplicbility nd ccurcy of the proposed Bernstein colloction method The numericl results obtined on the colloction points + (b )s n, s = 0, 1,, n re presented nd compred with the other methods Exmple 41 Consider the following nonliner Volterr integrl eqution: y(x) = 2 e x + e x t y 2 (t)dt, 0 x 1 0 Exct solution of the bove eqution is y(x) = 1 Let y 0 (x) = 2 e x be initil pproximtion function In Figure 1 nd Tble 1, the bsolute errors E r (x) by considering the Bernstein colloction method obtined t the colloction points s n, s = 0, 1,, n re given for n = 3 nd itertions r = 1, 2, 3, 4 Besides, in Figure 2, the bsolute errors e n (x) of the proposed method re presented for different vlues n = 2, 3, 4 nd 5-th itertion Figure 1: The numericl results of E r (x) errors for n = 3

N İşler Acr, A Dşcıoğlu, J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 4645 Tble 1: The numericl results of E r (x) errors for n = 3 n = 3 r = 1 r = 2 r = 3 r = 4 0 0 0 0 0 01 56 10 3 75 10 3 23 10 4 17 10 7 02 43 10 3 86 10 3 28 10 4 21 10 7 03 78 10 3 63 10 3 22 10 4 17 10 7 04 34 10 2 34 10 3 13 10 4 11 10 7 05 79 10 2 28 10 3 10 10 4 93 10 8 06 15 10 1 76 10 3 22 10 4 18 10 7 07 24 10 1 21 10 2 55 10 4 43 10 7 08 36 10 1 45 10 2 12 10 3 89 10 7 09 51 10 1 83 10 2 22 10 3 16 10 6 10 70 10 1 14 10 1 37 10 3 27 10 6 Figure 2: The numericl results of e n (x) errors for 5-th itertion Figure 3: The comprison of numericl results of e n (x) errors for n = 4 nd 5-th itertion Tble 2: The comprison of the e n (x) errors of Exmple 41 Lgrnge Colloction Method [13] Presented Method x n = 2 n = 3 n = 4 n = 4 r = 2 r = 5 r = 2 r = 5 r = 2 r = 5 r = 2 r = 5 01 47 10 5 76 10 17 23 10 4 15 10 16 58 10 5 17 10 16 25 10 3 18 10 15 02 45 10 5 19 10 16 28 10 4 27 10 16 39 10 5 28 10 16 79 10 4 66 10 16 03 74 10 6 56 10 17 22 10 4 14 10 17 87 10 6 36 10 17 14 10 3 15 10 15 04 11 10 4 0 13 10 4 69 10 17 39 10 6 35 10 17 18 10 3 21 10 15 05 26 10 4 0 11 10 4 0 35 10 5 0 90 10 4 12 10 15 06 46 10 4 0 22 10 4 11 10 16 84 10 5 56 10 17 36 10 3 11 10 15 07 71 10 4 56 10 17 55 10 4 0 11 10 4 56 10 17 18 10 2 24 10 15 08 10 10 3 11 10 16 12 10 3 11 10 16 35 10 5 56 10 17 55 10 2 13 10 15 09 14 10 3 0 22 10 3 11 10 16 23 10 4 11 10 16 13 10 1 15 10 14 The bsolute error results of the proposed method re compred with the results given by Mleknejd nd Njfi [13] in Tble 2 nd Figure 3 The numericl results of the Bernstein colloction method re obtined t the colloction points s n, s = 0, 1,, n by considering the first itertion function y 0(x) = 2 e x Besides, Mleknejd nd Njfi hve presented colloction method bsed on qusilineriztion technique nd Lgrnge bsis polynomils for the first itertion function y 0 (x) = 1 e x According to Tble 2, the presented method hs better numericl solutions thn the other method for r = 2 nd r = 5 The

N İşler Acr, A Dşcıoğlu, J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 4646 best results re lso obtined for n = 2 by the presented method, therefore, it is not necessry to enlrge n since the rounding error increses while n increses Exmple 42 Consider the following nonliner Fredholm-Volterr integrl eqution: y(x) = 2x+7 7x4 3 + 1 (x + t)y 2 (t)dt + (x t)y(t)dt, 1 x 1 1 Exct solution of the bove eqution is y(x) = 2x Let y 0 (x) = 0 be the first itertion function 1 Tble 3: The numericl results of e men errors for Exmple 42 n r = 2 r = 3 r = 4 r = 5 r = 6 2 16 10 1 37 10 2 31 10 3 26 10 5 71 10 8 4 82 10 2 64 10 3 42 10 5 17 10 7 65 10 8 8 50 10 2 16 10 3 15 10 6 26 10 7 11 10 7 16 41 10 2 11 10 3 42 10 7 35 10 6 95 10 7 Men errors of the presented method with incresing n re given t the colloction points x s = 1 + 2s n, s = 0, 1,, n in Tble 3 We cn sy tht the numericl results of proposed method converge more rpidly for incresing itertion r 5 Conclusions In this study, colloction method bsed on the generlized Bernstein polynomils hs been developed for the numericl solution of nonliner Fredholm-Volterr integrl equtions itertively by using the qusilineriztion technique The qudrtic convergence nd error bound of the Bernstein colloction method hve been nlyzed Exmples 41 nd 42 support tht the proposed method derived itertively converges more rpidly for incresing itertions r The dvntge of the proposed method is not complicted nd esy pplicbility to the nonliner equtions, becuse the nonliner equtions re reduced to liner equtions vi the qusilineriztion So the method does not need ny solution methods of nonliner equtions Acknowledgment This work is supported by the Scientific Reserch Project Coordintion Unit of Pmukkle University with number 2017KRM002-193 Some results of the present work hve been reported t the Interntionl Conference on the Theory, Methods nd Applictions of Nonliner Equtions, held t the University of Texs A&M, Kingsville in 2012 References [1] R P Agrwl, Y M Chow, Itertive methods for fourth order boundry vlue problem, J Comput Appl Mth, 10 (1984), 203 217 1 [2] B Ahmd, R Ali Khn, S Sivsundrm, Generlized qusilineriztion method for nonliner functionl differentil equtions, J Appl Mth Stochstic Anl, 16 (2003), 33 43 1 [3] A Akyuz Dscioglu, N Isler, Bernstein colloction method for solving nonliner differentil equtions, Mth Comput Appl, 18 (2013), 293 300 1 [4] A Akyüz-Dşcıoğlu, N İşler Acr, C Güler, Bernstein colloction method for solving nonliner Fredholm-Volterr integrodifferentil equtions in the most generl form, J Appl Mth, 2014 (2014), 8 pges 1 [5] A C Bird, Jr, Modified qusilineriztion technique for the solution of boundry-vlue problems for ordinry differentil equtions, J Optimiztion Theory Appl, 3 (1969), 227 242 1

N İşler Acr, A Dşcıoğlu, J Nonliner Sci Appl, 10 (2017), 4638 4647 4647 [6] R E Bellmn, R E Klb, Qusilineriztion nd nonliner boundry-vlue problems, Modern Anlytic nd Computionl Methods in Science nd Mthemtics, Americn Elsevier Publishing Co, Inc, New York, (1965) 1 [7] Z Drici, F A McRe, J V Devi, Qusilineriztion for functionl differentil equtions with retrdtion nd nticiption, Nonliner Anl, 70 (2009), 1763 1775 1 [8] R T Frouki, V T Rjn, Algorithms for polynomils in Bernstein form, Comput Aided Geom Design, 5 (1988), 1 26 1 [9] N İşler Acr, A Akyüz-Dşcıoğlu, A colloction method for Lne-Emden Type equtions in terms of generlized Bernstein polynomils, Pioneer J Mth Mth Sci, 12 (2014), 81 97 1 [10] K I Joy, Bernstein polynomils, On-Line Geometric Modeling Notes, Visuliztion nd Grphics Reserch Group, Deprtment of Computer Science, University of Cliforni, Dvis, (2000), 1 13 1 [11] E S Lee, Qusilineriztion nd invrint imbedding, First edition, Acdemic Press, New York, (1968) 1 [12] G G Lorentz, Bernstein polynomils, Second edition, Chelse Publishing Co, New York, (1986) 1 [13] K Mleknejd, E Njfi, Numericl solution of nonliner Volterr integrl equtions using the ide of qusilineriztion, Commun Nonliner Sci Numer Simul, 16 (2011), 93 100 1, 2, 41 [14] V B Mndelzweig, F Tbkin, Qusilineriztion pproch to nonliner problems in physics with ppliction to nonliner ODEs, Comput Phys Comm, 141 (2001), 268 281 1 [15] S G Pndit, Qudrticlly converging itertive schemes for nonliner Volterr integrl equtions nd n ppliction, J Appl Mth Stochstic Anl, 10 (1997), 169 178 1 [16] M G Phillips, Interpoltion nd pproximtion by polynomils, CMS Books in Mthemtics/Ouvrges de Mthmtiques de l SMC, Springer-Verlg, New York, (2003) 1 [17] J I Rmos, Piecewise qusilineriztion techniques for singulr boundry-vlue problems, Comput Phys Comm, 158 (2004), 12 25 1 [18] P-G Wng, Y-H Wu, B Wiwtnpphee, An extension of method of qusilineriztion for integro-differentil equtions, Int J Pure Appl Mth, 54 (2009), 27 37 1