Origin of the atttractive part of Lennard-Jones potential

Similar documents
L8: The Mechanics of Adhesion used by the Gecko

Nano-Attach Project. Hope Chik, Motorola Celestica-iNEMI Technology Forum May 15, 2007

Multiscale modelling and simulation of the deformation and adhesion of a single gecko seta

Chapter 1: Chemical Bonding

ψ s a ˆn a s b ˆn b ψ Hint: Because the state is spherically symmetric the answer can depend only on the angle between the two directions.

Intermolecular Forces in Density Functional Theory

Rydberg States of ThIII and UV

Atomic and molecular interaction forces in biology

CE 530 Molecular Simulation

( r) = 1 Z. e Zr/a 0. + n +1δ n', n+1 ). dt ' e i ( ε n ε i )t'/! a n ( t) = n ψ t = 1 i! e iε n t/! n' x n = Physics 624, Quantum II -- Exam 1

Department of Physics, Princeton University. Graduate Preliminary Examination Part I. Thursday, May 7, :00 am - 12:00 noon

NYU Physics Preliminary Examination in Electricity & Magnetism Fall 2011

Physics 828 Problem Set 7 Due Wednesday 02/24/2010

Problem 1: A 3-D Spherical Well(10 Points)

A detailed 3D finite element analysis of the peeling behavior of a gecko spatula

Lecture C2 Microscopic to Macroscopic, Part 2: Intermolecular Interactions. Let's get together.

Lecture 33: Intermolecular Interactions

Gecko and many insects (Fig. 1) have evolved fibrillar structures

P3317 HW from Lecture and Recitation 7

1 r 2 sin 2 θ. This must be the case as we can see by the following argument + L2

General Physical Chemistry II

Colloid Chemistry. La chimica moderna e la sua comunicazione Silvia Gross.

Eigenmodes for coupled harmonic vibrations. Algebraic Method for Harmonic Oscillator.

Specific ion effects on the interaction of. hydrophobic and hydrophilic self assembled

Nanoscale Accepted Manuscript

Lecture 8: Radial Distribution Function, Electron Spin, Helium Atom

Topics Covered: Motion in a central potential, spherical harmonic oscillator, hydrogen atom, orbital electric and magnetic dipole moments

Point mass approximation. Rigid beam mechanics. spring constant k N effective mass m e. Simple Harmonic Motion.. m e z = - k N z

07: Intermolecular and surface forces

Approximation Methods in QM

The Einstein A and B Coefficients

Graduate Written Examination Fall 2014 Part I

CHEMISTRY. Chapter 11 Intermolecular Forces Liquids and Solids

Phys 102 Lecture 2 Coulomb s Law & Electric Dipoles

Long range interaction --- between ions/electrons and ions/electrons; Coulomb 1/r Intermediate range interaction --- between

Molecular mechanics. classical description of molecules. Marcus Elstner and Tomáš Kubař. April 29, 2016

Material Properties & Characterization - Surfaces

Scientific Computing II

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Solution We start from the usual relation between the molar polarization, P m, the polarizability, α, and the dipole moment, µ: N A.

ECEN 5005 Crystals, Nanocrystals and Device Applications Class 20 Group Theory For Crystals

On the optimum shape of thin adhesive strips for various peeling directions

Scanning Force Microscopy

Chiroptical Spectroscopy

Intermission: Let s review the essentials of the Helium Atom

Lecture 5: Harmonic oscillator, Morse Oscillator, 1D Rigid Rotor

Preliminary Examination - Day 1 Thursday, August 10, 2017

Water-methanol separation with carbon nanotubes and electric fields

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 9, February 8, 2006

Fundamental Interactions: 6 Forces

PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Final Exam SOLUTIONS December 17, 2004, 7:30 a.m.- 9:30 a.m.

Printed from file Manuscripts/Stark/stark.tex on February 24, 2014 Stark Effect

Problem Set 5: Solutions

Surface interactions part 1: Van der Waals Forces

Biophysics II. Hydrophobic Bio-molecules. Key points to be covered. Molecular Interactions in Bio-molecular Structures - van der Waals Interaction

REVIEW: The Matching Method Algorithm

The broad topic of physical metallurgy provides a basis that links the structure of materials with their properties, focusing primarily on metals.

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

S.E. of H.O., con con t

FIRST PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Trinity Term Preliminary Examination in Chemistry SUBJECT 3: PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY. Time allowed: 2 ½ hours

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

Imperfect Gases. NC State University

Light-Matter Interactions

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers

0 + E (1) and the first correction to the ground state energy is given by

Chapter 3. Crystal Binding

Qualifying Exam for Ph.D. Candidacy Department of Physics October 11, 2014 Part I

Chem 442 Review for Exam 2. Exact separation of the Hamiltonian of a hydrogenic atom into center-of-mass (3D) and relative (3D) components.

Second Quantization Method for Bosons

Quantum Condensed Matter Physics Lecture 4

2m 2 Ze2. , where δ. ) 2 l,n is the quantum defect (of order one but larger

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Materials 218/UCSB: Class III Cohesion in solids van der Waals, ionic, covalent, metallic

and Polar Molecules Patrick Regan December 5, 2014

Chem 344 Final Exam Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2007, 3-?? PM

Diatomic Molecules. 7th May Hydrogen Molecule: Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

Charge Conservation and Polarization

PEEL ZONE MODEL OF TAPE PEELING BASED ON THE GECKO ADHESIVE SYSTEM

1 Reduced Mass Coordinates

Phase transitions of quadrupolar fluids

Chemistry 532 Problem Set 7 Spring 2012 Solutions

PHYSICS 219 Homework 2 Due in class, Wednesday May 3. Makeup lectures on Friday May 12 and 19, usual time. Location will be ISB 231 or 235.

Optical Lattices. Chapter Polarization

For a system with more than one electron, we can t solve the Schrödinger Eq. exactly. We must develop methods of approximation, such as

Practical Quantum Mechanics

PHY413 Quantum Mechanics B Duration: 2 hours 30 minutes

Central density. Consider nuclear charge density. Frois & Papanicolas, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 37, 133 (1987) QMPT 540

Biomolecular modeling I

- intermolecular forces forces that exist between molecules

Gases and the Virial Expansion

Example questions for Molecular modelling (Level 4) Dr. Adrian Mulholland

Chapter 21 Electric Charge and the Electric Field

An Introduction to Quantum Chemistry and Potential Energy Surfaces. Benjamin G. Levine

1.3 Molecular Level Presentation

Structuring of hydrophobic and hydrophilic polymers at interfaces Stephen Donaldson ChE 210D Final Project Abstract

Molecular Magnetic Properties

Molecular Forces in Biological Systems - Electrostatic Interactions; - Shielding of charged objects in solution

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Transcription:

Origin of the atttractive part of Lennard-Jones potential Masahiro Yamamoto Department of Chemistry, Konan University, Kobe, 658-850, Japan (Dated: February 7, 06) A. Origin of the attractive part of L-J potential Now we condsider two hydrogen atoms. If the two atoms are located far away, the Hamiltonian H 0 and the wavefunction Ψ of the system is given by two independent H atoms, h m ( + ) e e 4πɛ 0 r 4πɛ 0 r () Ψ ψ (r )ψ (r ) R nl (r )Y lm (ˆr )R nl (r )Y lm (ˆr ) nlm nlm () H 0 The ground state Ψ 0 is given by 00 00. If the two H atoms get closer, they interact each other and the potential e e + + z r r r FIG. : van der Waals interaction between two hydrogen atom V (perturbation) is given by V e 4πɛ 0 r e 4πɛ 0 r + r e 4πɛ 0 r + r + e 4πɛ 0 r + r + r (3) If we assume r >> r, r, and vector r is in the z direction. r (0, 0, z). If we consider the order up to r (x /r ) because the (/r)(z /r) order terms are cancelled out. If we use ( + x) / x/ + 3x /8... r r (x x ) + (y y ) + (z z ) ] / r z zz + x + y + z r + zz + x + y + z r r + r r ( zz + x + y + z r + 3z r ) r ] / ] / r ( zz + x + y + z r + 3z r ) r r + r r zz + zz + x x x + x + y y y + y + z z z + z r + 3 V e 4πɛ 0 r ( + zz + x + y + z r 3z + zz + x + y + z r 3z + zz + zz + x x x + x + y y y + y + z z z + z r + 3 e 4πɛ 0 r 3 (x x + y y + z z 3z z ) (z z ) r ] z + z z z r ) e 4πɛ 0 r 3 (x x + y y z z ) (4) This is the instantaneous dipole-dipole interaction /(4πɛ 0 r 3 ) µ µ 3( µ ˆr)( µ ˆr)]. Here µ e(r ), µ e(r ). Using perturbation theory the energy change is given by E n E n (0) + () n + () n +... (5) () n n V n V nn (6)

() n k n V nk E (0) n E (0) k (7) For ground state n 0, E (0) 0 ɛ 0 (atom) + ɛ 0 (atom) and () e n 0 4πɛ 0 r 3 (x x + y y z z ) 0 e 4πɛ 0 r 3, 0, 0(atom), 0, 0(atom) (x x + y y z z ), 0, 0(atom), 0, 0(atom) e 4πɛ 0 r 3, 0, 0(atom) x, 0, 0(atom), 0, 0(atom) x, 0, 0(atom) +... 0 (8) In the last equation the integral of the product of even, odd, even functions becomes zero. and the second order () 0 V 0k ɛ 0 (atom) + ɛ 0 (atom) ɛ k (atom) + ɛ k (atom) k 0 e 4 (4πɛ 0 ) r 6 k 0 0 x x + y y z z k k x x + y y z z 0 ɛ 0 (atom) + ɛ 0 (atom) ɛ k (atom) + ɛ k (atom) (9) Using the relation k k k 0 0 + k 0 k k, and we assume that the denominator is constant and ɛ 0 (atom) + ɛ 0 (atom) ɛ k (atom) + ɛ k (atom) (I + I ), here I, I is the ionization energy of atom and. () e 4 0 (4πɛ 0 ) r 6 0 (x x + y y z z ) 0 I + I e 4 (4πɛ 0 ) r 6 0(atom) x I + I 0(atom) 0(atom) x 0(atom) + 0(atom) y 0(atom) 0(atom) y 0(atom) + 4 0(atom) z 0(atom) 0(atom) z 0(atom) ] In the same perturbation theory the atomic polarizability is given by α e k 0 0 z k k z 0 E (0) 0 E (0) k e I 0 z 0 (0) Here the electric field is in z-direction. Then we can get 0 z 0 0 x 0 0 y 0 (αi)/(e ) With this relation () e 4 α I α I 0 (4πɛ 0 ) r 6 I + I e e + α ] I α I e e + 4α I α I e e 3 α α I I (4πɛ 0 ) r 6 () I + I This equation was derived by F. London (Z. Phys. 63, 45-79,930). Since the vdw interaction can not be estimated from usual density functional theory( because we should consider excitation and dynamical dipole-dipole interaction), some semiempirical correction based on Eq.() is reported. (e.g. F. Ortmann et al. PRB, 73, 050, 006) B. LJ potential The final result give the attractive part of the Lennard-Jones potential, φ(r) 4ɛ(σ/r) (σ/r) 6 ]. In the mixed system one can use the following convention(lorentz-berthelot mixing rule) σ ij σ i + σ j () ɛ ij ɛ i ɛ j (3)

In the case of σ ij we can understand the rule from the view point of hard-sphere. In the case of ɛ ij we should consider Eq.() α i 4ɛ i σi 6 3 I i (4πɛ 0 ), 4ɛ jσj 6 3 α j (4πɛ 0 ) I j 3 ɛ ij ɛ i ɛ j 3 α i α j Ii I j 6 (4πɛ 0 ) σ 3 i σ3 j (4) From the final equation the approximation of Eq.(3) may be not bad. If one consider the deviation form the standard mixing rule, the modified Lorentz-Berthelot mixing rule can be used. ξ is the deviation parameter. ɛ ij ξ ɛ i ɛ j, σ ij σ i + σ j (5) FIG. : from http://socrates.berkeley.edu/ peattiea/research main.html The Gecko (???? jcan stick to the wall. (both on the hydrophilic and hydrophobic surace and even dead gacko can stick!!) They have billion contacting point per foot and interact via van der Waals force!!. The total adhesive stress from Autumn s force measurements is 576 kpa (5.68 atm). Kellar Autumn, Yiching A. Liang, S. Tonia Hsieh, Wolfgang Zesch, Wai Pang Chan, Thomas W. Lenny, Ronald Fearing and Robert J. Full (000) Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair, Nature, 405(6787). 68-685, and Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 00 99, 5-6. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang YA, Peattie AM, Hansen WR, Sponberg S, Kenny TW, Fearing R, Israelachvili JN, Full RJ.] Recently Huber et al. showed that the evidence for capillary force contribution to gecko adhesion from single spatula AFM force measurment. (PNAS, 0, 693-696, 005) The pull-off force is increased lineary (from 7 nn to nn) with the humidity for hydrophilic flat surface and the the increase is not so much (from 6 nn to 9 nn) for hydrophobic surface. At the humidity around 90 % the monolayer of water is adsorbed on the hydrophilic surface. C. Kittel s derivation of the attractive part of LJ potential: dynamical effect Now we consider the two neutral atom is separated by R. At a certain moment the atoms induce dipole moment in each other and the induced dipole moments cause an attractive interaction between the atoms. We assume the two atoms are identical linear harmonic oscillators and only electrons move in the x-direction. When the displacement of electrons are x and x, the force constants are K, and the momenta of the oscillators are p and p The hamiltonian of the system without the interaction between the induced dipole moments is H 0 m p + Kx + m p + Kx (6)

4 FIG. 3: capillary force x x + - + - R FIG. 4: Kittel s explanation on the vdw attractive potential (ISSP book) Here m is the mass of electron and K mω 0. The energy of the ground state is the double of the zero point energ The interaction H between the dipoles becomes H e 4πɛ 0 R }{{} ++ e E 0 hω 0 hω 0 (7) e + 4πɛ 0 (R + x ) 4πɛ 0 (R + x x ) 4πɛ 0 (R x ) }{{}}{{}}{{} + + Here e is the elementary charge and ɛ 0 is the permittivity of free space. If we assume that R x, x. 4πɛ 0 H e R ( x ) R R + x R + x x + (x x ) ] R R R ( + x R R + x ) R (9) R x + (x x ) x ] x x R 3 (0) Here we used the approximation /( ± x) x + (/)x +... The total hamiltonian becomes If we use the symmetric and anti-symmetric coordinate H H 0 + H m p + Kx + m p + Kx x x R 3 () and also use the symmetric and anti-symmetric momenta e (8) x s (x + x ), x a (x x ) () x (x s + x a ), x (x s x a ) (3) p s (p + p ), p a (p p ) (4)

p (p s + p a ), p (p s p a ) (5) 5 The total hamiltonian becomes H m p s + ) ] (K e 4πɛ 0 R 3 x s + m p a + ) ] (K + e 4πɛ 0 R 3 x a (6) The two vibrational frequencies are found for this interacting system ) / ( ω (K ± e K e /m] )] / 4πɛ 0 R 3 ± m 4πɛ 0 KR 3 (7) e ω 0 ( ) / ± 4πɛ 0 KR 3 (8) If assume that (e )/(4πɛ 0 KR 3 ), we can use ( ± x) / ± (/)x (/8)x +... ω ω 0 ± ( ) e 4πɛ 0 KR 3 ( ) e 8 4πɛ 0 KR 3 +...] (9) The zero point energy change is E hω 0 + ( e 4πɛ 0 KR 3 ( ) e hω 0 8 4πɛ 0 KR 3 ) ( ) e ] 8 4πɛ 0 KR 3 + hω 0 ( ) e 4πɛ 0 KR 3 ( ) e ] 8 4πɛ 0 KR 3 hω 0 hω 0 e 4 3π ɛ 0 K R 6 A R 6 (30) The attractive interaction is proportional to R 6 and A include the dynamics of the oscillator through ω 0