SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C4: PARTICLE PHYSICS

Similar documents
SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C4: PARTICLE PHYSICS

Particle Physics: Problem Sheet 5

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

Lecture 11. Weak interactions

Subatomic Physics: Particle Physics Study Guide

Outline. Charged Leptonic Weak Interaction. Charged Weak Interactions of Quarks. Neutral Weak Interaction. Electroweak Unification

IX. Electroweak unification

Name : Physics 490. Practice Final (closed book; calculator, one notecard OK)

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2012

Outline. Charged Leptonic Weak Interaction. Charged Weak Interactions of Quarks. Neutral Weak Interaction. Electroweak Unification

6. QED. Particle and Nuclear Physics. Dr. Tina Potter. Dr. Tina Potter 6. QED 1

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2013

Discovery of Pions and Kaons in Cosmic Rays in 1947

PARTICLE PHYSICS Major Option

Particle Physics Lecture 1 : Introduction Fall 2015 Seon-Hee Seo

Particle Physics. Lecture 12: Hadron Decays.!Resonances!Heavy Meson and Baryons!Decays and Quantum numbers!ckm matrix

Current knowledge tells us that matter is made of fundamental particle called fermions,

Discrete Transformations: Parity

Dr Victoria Martin, Prof Steve Playfer Spring Semester 2013

OUTLINE. CHARGED LEPTONIC WEAK INTERACTION - Decay of the Muon - Decay of the Neutron - Decay of the Pion

High Energy Physics. Lecture 9. Deep Inelastic Scattering Scaling Violation. HEP Lecture 9 1

DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING

Nuclear and Particle Physics 3: Particle Physics. Lecture 1: Introduction to Particle Physics February 5th 2007

An Introduction to the Standard Model of Particle Physics

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2013

Experimental Aspects of Deep-Inelastic Scattering. Kinematics, Techniques and Detectors

PG lectures- Particle Physics Introduction. C.Lazzeroni

Introduction to particle physics Lecture 6

Beyond Standard Model Effects in Flavour Physics: p.1

Part II Particle and Nuclear Physics Examples Sheet 1

M. Cobal, PIF 2006/7. Quarks

Particle Physics WS 2012/13 ( )

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Lecture 12 Weak Decays of Hadrons

Neutrino Physics. Kam-Biu Luk. Tsinghua University and University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

1 Introduction. 1.1 The Standard Model of particle physics The fundamental particles

INTRODUCTION TO THE STANDARD MODEL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS

Option 212: UNIT 2 Elementary Particles

Particle Physics WS 2012/13 ( )

Weak Interactions & Neutral Currents

Neutrinos Lecture Introduction

Parity violation. no left-handed ν$ are produced

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2013

Weak interactions. Chapter 7

Weak interactions and vector bosons

Weak. interactions. V. Hedberg Weak Interactions 1

Decays and Scattering. Decay Rates Cross Sections Calculating Decays Scattering Lifetime of Particles

Quantum Numbers. F. Di Lodovico 1 EPP, SPA6306. Queen Mary University of London. Quantum Numbers. F. Di Lodovico. Quantum Numbers.

Question. Why are oscillations not observed experimentally? ( is the same as but with spin-1 instead of spin-0. )

Finding the Higgs boson

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com 1

The Development of Particle Physics. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev E45, Tel.:

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2012

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2013

FYS3510 Subatomic Physics. Exam 2016

Modern Physics: Standard Model of Particle Physics (Invited Lecture)

The Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology

Quantum Chromodynamics at LHC

Elementary Particle Physics Glossary. Course organiser: Dr Marcella Bona February 9, 2016

Electroweak Physics. Krishna S. Kumar. University of Massachusetts, Amherst

FYS3510 Subatomic Physics. Exam 2016

Cosmology and particle physics

TPP entrance examination (2012)

Isospin. K.K. Gan L5: Isospin and Parity 1

Antonio Pich. IFIC, CSIC Univ. Valencia.

Physics at Hadron Colliders Partons and PDFs

Books: - Martin, B.R. & Shaw, G Particle Physics (Wiley) (recommended) - Perkins, D.H. Introduction to High Energy Physics (CUP) (advanced)

Search for a Z at an e + e - Collider Thomas Walker

Lecture 16 V2. October 24, 2017

Particle Physics. Lecture 11: Mesons and Baryons

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2012

Homework 3: Group Theory and the Quark Model Due February 16

High Energy Physics. QuarkNet summer workshop June 24-28, 2013

Contents. Preface to the First Edition Preface to the Second Edition

Lecture 6-4 momentum transfer and the kinematics of two body scattering

Gian Gopal Particle Attributes Quantum Numbers 1

Weak. interactions. V. Hedberg Weak Interactions 1

A brief history of neutrino. From neutrinos to cosmic sources, DK&ER

Lecture 3: Quarks and Symmetry in Quarks

Overview. The quest of Particle Physics research is to understand the fundamental particles of nature and their interactions.

Precision measurement of

Kern- und Teilchenphysik I Lecture 13:Quarks and QCD

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2013

Introduction to Neutrino Physics. TRAN Minh Tâm

M. Cobal, PIF 2006/7. Quarks

FYS 3510 Subatomic physics with applications in astrophysics. Nuclear and Particle Physics: An Introduction

Modern physics 1 Chapter 13

PHYSICS PARTICLE. An Introductory Course of. Palash B. Pal. CRC Press. Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics. Kolkata, India. Taylor &.

Particle Physics. Dr Victoria Martin, Spring Semester 2012 Lecture 1: The Mysteries of Particle Physics, or Why should I take this course?

Measurement of CP Violation in B s J/ΨΦ Decay at CDF

Particles and Deep Inelastic Scattering

Units and dimensions

Examination in Nuclear and Particle Physics

Particle Physics A short History

Topics in Standard Model. Alexey Boyarsky Autumn 2013

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 24. Exam 2 Particle Detectors

Oddelek za fiziko. Top quark physics. Seminar. Author: Tina Šfiligoj. Mentor: prof. dr. Svjetlana Fajfer. Ljubljana, february 2012

2007 Section A of examination problems on Nuclei and Particles

Transcription:

A047W SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C C4: PARTICLE PHYSICS TRINITY TERM 05 Thursday, 8 June,.30 pm 5.45 pm 5 minutes reading time Answer four questions. Start the answer to each question in a fresh book. A list of physical constants and conversion factors accompanies this paper. The numbers in the margin indicate the weight that the Examiners anticipate assigning to each part of the question. Do NOT turn over until told that you may do so. Pages and 3 contain particle physics formulae and data for this paper. The questions start on page 4.

C4 Particle Physics formulae and data Unless otherwise indicated, the questions on this paper use natural units with h = c =. The energy unit is GeV. Cross sections Length Time Fermi constant GeV = 0.3894 mb GeV = 0.973 fm GeV = 6.58 0 5 s G F =.66 0 5 GeV Dirac (Dirac-Pauli representation) and Pauli matrices ( ) ( ) γ 0 I 0 0 σ =, γ =, 0 I σ 0 γ 5 = ( ) ( ) 0 0 i σ =, σ 0 =, i 0 σ 3 = ( 0 I I 0 ( 0 0 ) ) Rotation matrices j, m e ijyθ j, m = d j m m (θ) d / ++ = d / = cos(θ/) ; d / + = d / + = sin(θ/). d = d = ( + cos θ)/ ; d = d = ( cos θ)/ ; d 00 = cos θ ; d 0 = d 0 = d 0 = d 0 = sin θ/. Spherical harmonics Y m l (θ, φ) 3 4π 5 Y0 0 = 4π ; Y 0 = 5 Y 0 = 6π (3 cos θ ) ; Y ± = ± 3 cos θ ; Y = 8π sin θ e±iφ. 8π sin θ cos θ e±iφ ; Y ± = 5 3π sin θ e ±iφ. CKM quark mixing matrix The mixing of the charge e/3 quark mass eigenstates (d, s, b) is expressed in a 3 3 unitary matrix V : d V ud V us V ub s = V cd V cs V cb b V td V ts V tb The magnitudes of the elements, derived from the Particle Data Group 004 tables, are given below. The number in brackets gives an estimate of the uncertainty in the last digit. Note that these values may not give an exactly unitary matrix, but this has no significance. 0.975(0) 0.4(3) 0.004() V = 0.4(3) 0.974() 0.04() 0.009(5) 0.040(3) 0.999(0) d s b. A047W

Clebsch Gordan coefficients J 3 3 3 3 m m M + 3 + + 3 + + + /3 /3 0 + /3 /3 0 /3 /3 + /3 /3 J 0 m m M + + + 0 0 0 + + + 0 / / 0 + / / + /6 / /3 0 0 /3 0 /3 + /6 / /3 0 / / 0 / / Breit-Wigner resonance formula The formula represents the energy dependence of the total cross-section σ(i f) for unpolarised scattering between a two-body initial state i to a final state f, in the vicinity of a resonance of rest-mass energy M, spin J and total width Γ. σ(i f) = π λ Γ i Γ f g [(E M) + Γ /4], where λ = hc pc, g = J +, p is the magnitude of the centre-of-mass momentum of the initial state particles, s a, s b are their spins and Γ i, Γ f the initial and (s a + )(s b + ) final state partial widths. A047W 3 [Turn over]

. The lowest order differential cross section for the charged current reaction ν e e ν e e is given by the formula dσ dy = G s F π ( y), () where G F is the Fermi coupling constant, s is the square of the centre-of-mass energy and y = (E E )/E, where E (E) is the energy of the outgoing (incoming) ν e in the laboratory frame of reference in which the electron is initially at rest. Determine the dependence of the differential cross section on the centre-of-mass scattering angle θ, clearly stating your assumptions. Using the above definition of y, show that y = ( cos θ ) and hence explain the y-dependence in equation. [0] Assuming that the proton is composed of quarks, but neglecting anti-quarks and explaining any further assumptions, show that in the parton model the differential cross section for ν µ scattering on protons is given by dσ(ν µ p) dx dy = G F s x π ( y) q(x), where q(x) is the parton density function for quarks and x is the momentum fraction carried by a quark in the proton. Show that the total cross section for deep inelastic scattering of ν µ p scales as E, where E is the energy of the ν µ in the laboratory frame of reference. Explain the physical significance of this scaling behaviour. [7] Explain how intense beams of high energy ν µ can be produced. Describe the key features of a suitable detector for studying deep inelastic scattering using beams of ν µ, and explain how the momentum of the outgoing muon and the energy of the scattered quark can be measured. [8] A047W 4

. Draw Feynman diagrams showing the allowed Standard Model couplings of gauge bosons to high-energy fermions. Indicate on your diagrams the helicity states of the fermions involved, and identify the diagrams and gauge bosons that are relevant for high-energy e + e µ + µ. [6] For e + e µ + µ, at high centre-of-mass energies but considering QED processes only, find the dependence of the interaction cross section on θ, the centre-ofmass scattering angle between same-charge incoming and outgoing fermions. List any assumption you make. [7] Experimental data from e + e collisions at centre-of-mass energies near the Z 0 mass show that the angular distribution of e + e µ + µ is not symmetric. Which processes beyond QED-only have to be included to explain this result? Calculate the angular distribution and comment on the difference with respect to the pure QED result. Explain briefly how this angular distribution could be applied to measure an important parameter of the Standard Model. [] A047W 5 [Turn over]

3. The left figure below shows data collected from e + e collisions with a centre-ofmass energy of s 3. GeV. The resonant state, known as J/ψ, is observed decaying to hadronic, muonic and electronic final states. Branching Fraction J/ψ e + e 6.0 0 J/ψ µ + µ 6.0 0 J/ψ ρ + π 5.6 0 3 J/ψ ρ 0 π 0 5.6 0 3 J/ψ ρ π + 5.6 0 3 J/ψ K 0 S K0 L. 0 4 J/ψ K 0 S K0 S not seen J/ψ p p. 0 3 η c p p.5 0 3 Explain how the isospin and J PC of the J/ψ may be inferred from the data and the information provided in the table and figure to the right. [4] Write down the Breit-Wigner formula for the cross section of the initial e + e state going to an e + e final state via the J/ψ resonance. Integrate and find an expression relating the total width of the resonance to the cross section. [6] Using this result and the data, estimate the natural width of the J/ψ resonance, given the acceptance efficiency of the experiment is 50%. With reference to the OZI rule, explain how the quark content of this state is inferred. [6] After the J/ψ discovery, several resonances with the same quark content were observed. Copy the energy level diagram above and, for each state, explain what its angular momentum quantum numbers are and hence deduce their J PC. [4] Four of these states are observed decaying to two photons. State which ones they are and why. The mass spectrum shows that the lowest mass state is η c. Why was the J/ψ discovered first? Both the η c and the J/ψ decay to a proton-antiproton pair. In each case, is there an angular dependence on the proton s direction? [5] A047W 6

4. In the two-flavour model of neutrino mixing, the mass eigenstates are related to the flavour eigenstates by one mixing angle, θ, ( ) ν = ν 3 ( cos θ sin θ sin θ cos θ ) ( ) νµ ν τ Using this model, and stating any assumptions made, derive the transition probability P (ν µ ν τ ), and hence the survival probability ( P (ν µ ν µ ) = sin (θ) sin.7 m L ) E where L [km] is the distance from creation of the muon neutrino of energy E [GeV], and m [ev ] is the difference between the squared masses of the two eigenstates. { Hint: consider a behaviour of the form ν a (t) = ν a exp [ i(e a t p a x)/ h ]. } [0] The minos detector is located 730 km from Fermilab in a ν µ beam. It consists of alternate layers of scintillation counters and magnetised iron plates oriented perpendicular to the beam. Describe how the ν µ is produced at Fermilab from a proton accelerator, and how the energy of the interacting ν µ is estimated by minos. [7]., The figure above shows the energy distribution of ν µ observed in the detector and the expected distribution with and without oscillations. Estimate m [ev ] given that θ π/4. What limits the precision of this experiment? How does your result compare to the m measured in solar neutrino experiments? What is the evidence from other experiments that in this regime of L/E, the dominant oscillation mode is ν µ ν τ? [8] A047W 7 [Turn over]

5. Compute the threshold energy for a ν τ to produce a charged current interaction when colliding with a stationary target. [4] The DONUT experiment was the first to observe tau-neutrinos directly. The ν τ beam was produced by colliding the 800 GeV Fermilab Tevatron beam into a block of material large enough to stop the charged pions and kaons. Why is it helpful to stop the π ± and K ±? The ν τ was made mainly from the decay of the D S meson. Draw Feynman diagrams for each interaction in the production sequence from the beam protons to the ν τ. Describe briefly how the CKM matrix can be used to explain the relative decay rates of different quarks and give the underlying CKM formalism. Explain why the production rate of ν τ from D S is larger than that from D ± and D 0 or any other particle produced in the interactions, given that the production cross sections are σ (D ± ) = µb/nucleon, σ ( D 0) = 7 µb/nucleon and σ (D S ) = 5. µb/nucleon. [4] The DONUT neutrino beam had a ν τ fraction of 0%, and 45% each of ν e and ν µ. Explain why it is not possible to get a beam close to 00% pure in ν τ and why it is plausible for the ν e and ν µ fractions to be similar. Briefly explain how it is possible to have near 00% pure sources of ν e and ν µ with specially optimised beam lines or accelerators. [7] A047W 8

6. Write down the Dirac equation for free electrons. Derive the adjoint Dirac equation and an expression for the probability current 4-vector. [6] Free electron positive energy solutions of the Dirac equation in the standard representation are ( ) where ψ s (r, t) = N χ s σ p E+m χs s =,, χ = ( 0 ) exp [ i(p r Et)/ h ],, χ = N is a normalization factor, and the other symbols have their usual meaning. Find N and explain why these wave functions are not normalized to one particle per unit volume. [6] The operator for spin projection on the x-axis is Σ = ( ) σ 0. 0 σ Find its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, and show that in the non-relativistic limit one can form linear combinations of ψ (r, t) and ψ (r, t) that are eigenvectors of Σ, but that at relativistic energies this is impossible. [8] Briefly describe how to produce an electron beam and how to make a polarised electron beam? [5] ( 0 ), A047W 9 [Turn over]

7. Draw Feynman diagrams for the decays of τ into leptons and hadrons. Find the branching fraction for τ -decays into hadrons, stating all assumptions you make. How is it possible to have final states involving both leptons and hadrons? Give examples and discuss whether these have a significant branching fraction. [7] Pairs of tau (τ + τ ) are produced at an e + e collider running at a centre-ofmass energy s = m Z c. What other pairs are produced? How can (τ + τ ) events be identified? [6] How can τ decays be utilized to (i) show that the τ carries a conserved tau-lepton number and has an associated neutrino; (ii) test lepton coupling universality; (iii) determine the mass of the τ neutrino? [4] Final states with charged hadrons with an average invariant mass of.5 GeV/c have been observed. Estimate the range of corresponding hadronic jet energies measured in a detector. Show that the sharing of energy between the hadronic products in the detector frame depends on the helicity state of the τ. Which helicity state gives on average the higher hadronic energy? [8] A047W 0

8. Write short accounts on THREE of the following topics. (a) The experimental determination of the helicity of the neutrino. (b) The theoretical background and experimental detail related to the detection of solar neutrino oscillation. (c) The motivation for the existence of a top-quark in the Standard Model and its discovery. (d) How values of the elements in the CKM matrix are measured. (e) The detector sub-systems (purpose and principle of operation) of a general purpose detector for colliding beams. [5] A047W [LAST PAGE]