Local higher category theory

Similar documents
in path component sheaves, and the diagrams

28 The fundamental groupoid, revisited The Serre spectral sequence The transgression The path-loop fibre sequence 23

T -spectra. Rick Jardine. March 2, University of Western Ontario

Model Structures on the Category of Small Double Categories

Algebraic models for higher categories

A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped with a Grothendieck topology T. A Grothendieck topology T consists of a collection of subfunctors

Categorical models of homotopy type theory

Waldhausen Additivity and Approximation in Quasicategorical K-Theory

Algebraic models of homotopy type theory

Algebraic models for higher categories

Galois descent criteria

Sheaf models of type theory

Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 10 Jul 2016

WALDHAUSEN ADDITIVITY: CLASSICAL AND QUASICATEGORICAL

Lecture 9: Sheaves. February 11, 2018

Fuzzy sets and presheaves

LOOP SPACES IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY. A Dissertation MARVIN GLEN DECKER

Introduction HOMOTOPY CLASSIFICATION OF GERBES. J. F. Jardine

The synthetic theory of -categories vs the synthetic theory of -categories

WHAT IS AN ELEMENTARY HIGHER TOPOS?

STUFF ABOUT QUASICATEGORIES

Higher Categories, Homotopy Theory, and Applications

Autour de la Géométrie Algébrique Dérivée

HOMOTOPY THEORY OF POSETS

An embedding of quasicategories in prederivators

Categorical Homotopy Type Theory

Abstracting away from cell complexes

REPRESENTATIONS OF SPACES

Derived Algebraic Geometry I: Stable -Categories

A homotopy theory of diffeological spaces

Higher toposes Internal logic Modalities Sub- -toposes Formalization. Modalities in HoTT. Egbert Rijke, Mike Shulman, Bas Spitters 1706.

Algebraic model structures

ON THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF ENRICHED CATEGORIES

Cellularity, composition, and morphisms of algebraic weak factorization systems

Lecture 007 (April 13, 2011) Suppose that A is a small abelian category, and let B be a full subcategory such that in every exact sequence

FUNCTORS BETWEEN REEDY MODEL CATEGORIES OF DIAGRAMS

Universität Regensburg Mathematik

Derived Algebraic Geometry III: Commutative Algebra

Homology of dendroidal sets

A model-independent theory of -categories

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.kt] 2 Oct 2003

NOTES ON LOGOI ANDRÉ JOYAL. To the memory of Jon Beck

Profinite Homotopy Theory

A CLOSED MODEL CATEGORY FOR (n 1)-CONNECTED SPACES

Stable homotopy theory of dendroidal sets

Homotopy type theory: a new connection between logic, category theory and topology

University of Oxford, Michaelis November 16, Categorical Semantics and Topos Theory Homotopy type theor

Derivatives of the identity functor and operads

Internal Language of Finitely Complete (, 1)-categories

RELATIVE 2-SEGAL SPACES

ADJOINT ASSOCIATIVITY: AN INVITATION TO ALGEBRA IN -CATEGORIES.

Category theory with applications in homotopy and homology theory. Birgit Richter

ON LEFT AND RIGHT MODEL CATEGORIES AND LEFT AND RIGHT BOUSFIELD LOCALIZATIONS

Graduate algebraic K-theory seminar

ON THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF ENRICHED CATEGORIES

CUBICAL APPROXIMATION FOR DIRECTED TOPOLOGY

Combinatorial Models for M (Lecture 10)

FLAGGED HIGHER CATEGORIES

Errata to Model Categories by Mark Hovey

A Whirlwind Tour of the World of (, 1)-categories

arxiv: v4 [math.ct] 5 Jun 2015

arxiv: v1 [math.at] 17 Mar 2013

T-homotopy and refinement of observation (I) : Introduction

Locally constant functors

LEFT-INDUCED MODEL STRUCTURES AND DIAGRAM CATEGORIES

PARAMETRIZED HIGHER CATEGORY THEORY

HIGHER SEGAL STRUCTURES IN ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY

arxiv: v2 [math.at] 29 Nov 2007

ON -TOPOI JACOB LURIE

SPECTRAL ENRICHMENTS OF MODEL CATEGORIES

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Homotopy Colimits of Relative Categories (Preliminary Version)

Grothendieck duality for affine M 0 -schemes.

Higher descent data as a homotopy limit

Symmetric monoidal structure on Non-commutative motives


Category Theory. Travis Dirle. December 12, 2017

AN INTRODUCTION TO MODEL CATEGORIES

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 18G55, 55U35, 18G10, 18G30, 55U10 Key words and phrases. cofibration category, model category, homoto

ON THE COFIBRANT GENERATION OF MODEL CATEGORIES arxiv: v1 [math.at] 16 Jul 2009

Homotopy type theory: towards Grothendieck s dream

1 Replete topoi. X = Shv proét (X) X is locally weakly contractible (next lecture) X is replete. D(X ) is left complete. K D(X ) we have R lim

The formal theory of adjunctions, monads, algebras, and descent

Commutative ring objects in pro-categories and generalized Moore spectra

LECTURE 1: SOME GENERALITIES; 1 DIMENSIONAL EXAMPLES

6. Lecture cdh and Nisnevich topologies. These are Grothendieck topologies which play an important role in Suslin-Voevodsky s approach to not

SOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2

Equivariant Trees and G-Dendroidal Sets

Derived Algebraic Geometry IX: Closed Immersions

Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7)

Archivum Mathematicum

Manifolds, Higher Categories and Topological Field Theories

Homotopical Algebra. Yuri Berest, Sasha Patotski

arxiv: v2 [math.at] 20 May 2016

Higher Categories and Homotopical Algebra. Universität Regensburg

Homotopy Theory of Topological Spaces and Simplicial Sets

Algebraic Models for Homotopy Types III Algebraic Models in p-adic Homotopy Theory

DERIVED CATEGORIES OF STACKS. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Conventions, notation, and abuse of language The lisse-étale and the flat-fppf sites

CATEGORIES AND TOPOLOGY 2016 (BLOCK 1) LECTURE NOTES, PART II JESPER GRODAL AND RUNE HAUGSENG

Transcription:

February 27, 2017

Path category The nerve functor B : cat sset is def. by BC n = hom(n, C), where n is the poset 0 1 n. The path category functor P : sset cat is the left adjoint of the nerve: P(X ) = lim n. n X Alternatively, P(X ) is the free category on the graph sk 1 X, subject to the relations s 0 x = 1 x and d 1 (σ) = d 0 (σ)d 2 (σ) for each 2-simplex σ : 2 X. d 2 x σ 0 x 1 d 1 σ x 2 d 0 σ

Preliminary facts Lemma 1. sk 2 (X ) X induces P(sk 2 (X )) = P(X ) for all simplicial sets X. Lemma 2. ɛ : P(BC) C is an isomorphism for all small categories C. Lemma 3. There is an isomorphism G(P(X )) = π(x ) for all simplicial sets X. G(P(X )) is the free groupoid on the category P(X ).

Triangulation There is a triangulation functor : cset sset. Every cubical set Y is a colimit of its cells n Y, and Y := lim n Y n = lim n Y B(1 n ) B(1 n ) = ( 1 ) n is a simplicial hypercube. 2 : (0, 1) (1, 1) (0, 0) (1, 0)

Path categories for cubical sets 1) K N is finite dimensional cubical complex: P(K) := P( K ). P( K ) = 2) Internal definition: lim n Y PB(1 n ) = lim n Y 1 n. P(K) is the free category on sk 1 K, subject to relations defined by degeneracies and 2-cells.

Geometric concurrency Basic idea (V. Pratt, 1991): represent the simultaneous execution of processors a and b as a picture (2-cell) a b b a Simultaneous action of multiple processors rep. by hypercubes. Restrictions on the system corr. to shared resources rep. by removing cubical cells, so one has a cubical subcomplex K N of an N-cell, N = number of processors. K is a higher dimensional automaton. Basic problem: Compute P(K)(x, y), execution paths from state x to state y.

Example: the Swiss flag b x=(a 1,b 1 ) y=(a 2,b 2 ) a

Path 2-category K = finite simplicial complex. 2-category resolution P 2 (K) P(K): π 0 P 2 (x, y) = P(K)(x, y) 0-cells are vertices of K, 1-cells x y are strings of nondegenerate 1-simplices of K x = x 0 x 1 x n = y, and 2-cells are generated by non-degenerate 2-cells of K d x... 1 x σ i 1 x i+1... y d 2 σ x d 0 σ i All data in P 2 (K) is finite for a finite simplicial complex K. Remark: algorithm to construct P 2 (K) and compute P(K).

Computations The necklace: L 40 is the subcomplex 1 3 39 0 2 4... 38 40 This is 20 copies of the complex 2 glued together. There are 2 20 morphisms in P(L)(0, 40). The listing of morphisms of P(L) consumes 2 GB of disk. Remarks: 1) The size of the path category P(L) grows exponentially with L ( exponential complexity ). 2) There are no parallel versions of the code no general patching algorithms. 3) Work so far: to compute P(K)(x, y), find {x, y} L K such that P(L) P(K) is fully faithful.

Quasicategories The path category P(X ) of a simplicial set X is the fundamental category τ 1 (X ) from Joyal s theory of quasicategories. Joyal s quasicategory model structure on sset is constructed, by the methods of Cisinski s thesis, by formally inverting the inner horn inclusions Λ n k n, k 0, n, and the inclusion 0 : 0 B(π( 1 )) =: I. I = interval object. π( 1 ) is a trivial groupoid with two objects. A quasicategory is a simplicial set X which has the right lifting property with respect to all inner horn inclusions Λ n k n. Lemma 4 (magic). Quasicategories are the fibrant objects for the quasicategory model structure.

Weak equivalences There is a triv. cof. j : X LX s.t. LX is a quasicategory, built from inner horn inclusions. A map X Y is a quasicategory equivalence (categorical equivalence) if the induced map LX LY is an I -homotopy equivalence. I -homotopy, I = Bπ( 1 ) : X f 0 X I Y 1 X g Cofibrations for quasicategory structure are monomorphisms. Joyal calls fibrations for this structure pseudo-fibrations.

Path category, again Lemma 5. Every inner horn inclusion Λ n k n induces an isomorphism P(Λ n k ) = P( n ) Corollary 6. Every quasicategory equivalence X Y induces an equivalence of categories P(X ) P(Y ). Consequence of Van Kampen theorem: P is left adjoint to nerve, hence takes pushouts to pushouts, so P(X ) = P(LX ). Remark: Equivalences of categories are rare in CS applications.

Core of a quasicategory A 1-simplex α : 1 X is invertible if the map [α] : d 1 α d 0 α is invertible in P(X ). Fact: If Y is a Kan complex, every 1-simplex of Y is invertible. Theorem 7 (Joyal). X = quasicategory. X is a Kan complex if and only if P(X ) is a groupoid. J(X ) X is the subcomplex whose simplices σ : n X have 1-skeleta sk 1 n n σ X consisting of invertible 1-simplices. J(X ) is the core of X. Corollary 8. J(X ) is the maximal Kan subcomplex of a quasicategory X. Interesting part: J(X ) is a Kan complex.

Examples 1) If C is a category, then BC is a quasicategory, since P(Λ n k ) = P( n ) for inner horns Λ n k n. J(BC) = B(Iso(C)). 2) Every Kan complex is a quasicategory. f : X Y of Kan complexes is a quasicategory equivalence if and only if it is a standard weak equivalence. g : Z W quasicategory equiv of quasicategories. Then g : J(Z) J(W ) is an ordinary weak equiv of Kan complexes. Facts: 1) X = quasicategory. Then [, X ] q = π0 J(X ). 2) C = category. Then [, BC] q = π0 B(Iso(C)) = π 0 Iso(C). 3) P = poset. Then Ob(P) = [, BP] q. eg. n 0 = [, n ] q. Recall n = Bn, n = {0, 1,..., n}.

Simplicial complexes Lemma 9. If K N, then K 0 = [, K]q. Proof: j : X LX is an isomorphism on vertices. Suppose i : K N is an isomorphism on vertices. Form the diagram K i N j LK [, LK] q is I -htpy classes of maps LK. If 2 vertices x, y : LK are I -homotopic, they are equal in N so x = y in LK. Thus LK 0 [, LK] q is a bijection, so K 0 [, K] q is a bijection.

Higher invariants Theorem 10. K = n, n 0 or n, n 1. f : X Y map of quasicategories. Then f is a quasicategory weak equivalence if and only if all functors π(jhom(k, X )) π(jhom(k, Y )) are equivalences of groupoids Corollary 11. g : Z W map of Kan complexes. Then g is a standard weak equivalence if and only if all functors g : π(hom( n, Z)) π(hom( n, W )), n 1, are equivalences of groupoids.

Classical local structure C = op T is the category of open subsets of a topological space T, so that the sheaf category Shv(C) has enough points (stalks). If F is a sheaf or presheaf on C, write p F = for the collection of all stalks. x T There are (injective) model structures on s Shv(C), s Pre(C) s.t. cofibrations are monomorphisms, and f : X Y is a local weak equiv. iff p X p Y is a weak equiv. of simplicial sets. The inclusion and associated sheaf functors form a Quillen equivalence L 2 : s Pre(C) s Shv(C) : i. F x

Local quasicategory structure Theorem 12 (Meadows [4]). There is a left proper model structure on s Pre(C) with cofibrations = monomorphisms, and s.t. f : X Y is a weak equiv. iff p X p Y is a quasicategory weak equiv of simplicial sets. Remarks: 1) There is a corresponding model structure for s Shv(C) with a Quillen equivalence L 2 : s Pre(C) s Shv(C) : i. 2) These are special cases of a general result which applies to all Grothendieck sites C, where p is a Boolean localization. 3) Weak equivalences for the theory are local quasicategory equivalences.

About the proof The proof is not a localization argument. Use a natural sectionwise quasicategory equivalence j : X LX, with LX a presheaf of quasicategories. Show that p j : p X p LX is a quasicategory equivalence: the map Λ n k U n U is a local quasicategory equivalence for all 0 < k < n and all U T open. Y = presheaf of quasicategories. Then p J(Y ) = J(p Y ), because J(Y ) is defined by pullbacks: J(Y ) n Y n 1 n Inv(Y ) 1 n Y 1 Inv(Y ) Y 1 Mor(Iso(P(Y )) Mor(P(Y ))

More on the proof Lemma 13. Suppose K = n, n. f : X Y map of presheaves of quasicategories is a local quasicategory equivalence if and only if all π(j(hom(k, X )) π(j(hom(k, Y )) are local weak equivs of presheaves of groupoids. Lemma 14 (Bounded cofibration). There is a regular cardinal α such that, given a picture X i A Y with i a trivial cofibration and A < α, there is a subobject A B Y s.t. B < α and B X B is a trivial cofibration.

Complete Segal spaces Rezk s complete Segal model structure on s 2 Set is constructed by localizing the Reedy (injective) structure at the cofibrations G(n) := Str( n ) 0 n 0 =: F (n) F (0) = 0 0 B(π( 1 )) 0 =: I where Str( n ) is the string of 1-simplices 0 1 n in n. I is the discrete nerve of π( 1 ). There are adjoint functors t! : s 2 Set sset : t!, where t! X p,q = hom( p Bπ( q ), X ) for simp. sets X.

Comparison theorem Theorem 15 (Joyal, Tierney). The functors t!, t! induce a Quillen equivalence between Rezk s complete Segal model structure on s 2 Set and the quasicategory model structure on sset.

Local version Meadows localizes the injective model structure on s 2 Pre(C) at the maps G(n) := Str( n ) 0 n 0 =: F (n) F (0) = 0 0 B(π( 1 )) 0 =: I. (identified with constant maps of bisimplicial presheaves) to form the local complete Segal model structure on s 2 Pre(C). The Joyal-Tierney theorem bootstraps to a comparison result: Theorem 16 (Meadows [3]). There is a Quillen equivalence t! : s 2 Pre(C) s Pre(C) : t!, between the local complete Segal model structure on s 2 Pre(C) and the local quasicategory structure on s Pre(C).

More to come The quasicategory structures and complete Segal model structures both fail to be right proper, and therefore do not have a global theory of cocycles, such as one sees in the injective model structure for s Pre(C). Bergner s model structure for categories enriched in simplicial sets is right proper, and Meadows expects to produce a right proper local version of that theory.

Descent Original definition: Y = simp. presheaf. Y satisfies descent iff every injective fibrant model j : Y Z is a sectionwise equiv. eg: A sheaf of groupoids G is a stack iff BG satisfies descent. Theorem 17 (Meadows). 1) f : X Y a morphism of presheaves of quasicategories. f is a local quasicategory equivalence if and only if all simplicial presheaf maps are local weak equivalences. Jhom( n, X ) Jhom( n, Y ) 2) X = presheaf of quasicategories. X satisfies descent for the local quasicategory structure if and only if all simplicial presheaves Jhom( n, X ) satisfy descent for the injective model structure.

Constructions Use k! Y for quasicategories Y : k! Y n = hom(bπ( n ), Y ). a natural triv. fibration k! Y J(Y ) if Y is a quasicategory. t! Y n = k! hom( n, Y ). Proof of quasicategory descent theorem uses Joyal-Tierney comparison theorem and Meadows local version.

An application X = presheaf of quasicategories, j : X LX be a fibrant model in the local quasicategory structure. J(X ) J(LX ) is a local weak equivalence. LX satisfies quasicategory descent. All Jhom( n, LX ) satisfy descent for the injective model structure, so J(LX ) satisfies descent. There are isomorphisms [, X ] q = [, LX ]q = πi (, LX ) = π I (, J(LX )) = [, J(LX )] = [, J(X )]. [, ] q is morphisms in local quasicategory homotopy category, [, ] is morphisms in local homotopy category. Example: A = presheaf of categories: [, BA] q = [, B Iso(A)] (non-abelian H 1 ).

References J. F. Jardine. Path categories and resolutions. Homology Homotopy Appl., 12(2):231 244, 2010. J.F. Jardine. Path categories and quasi-categories. Preprint, http://www.math.uwo.ca/~jardine/, 2015. N. Meadows. Local complete Segal spaces. Preprint, 2016. Nicholas J. Meadows. The local Joyal model structure. Theory Appl. Categ., 31:Paper No. 24, 690 711, 2016.