Pure Braid Group Representations of Low Degree

Similar documents
Gassner Representation of the Pure Braid Group P 4

On the Irreducibility of Perron Representations of Degrees 4 and 5

Research Article Another Proof of the Faithfulness of the Lawrence-Krammer Representation of the Braid Group B 3

18.312: Algebraic Combinatorics Lionel Levine. Lecture 22. Smith normal form of an integer matrix (linear algebra over Z).

Remark By definition, an eigenvector must be a nonzero vector, but eigenvalue could be zero.

GRE Subject test preparation Spring 2016 Topic: Abstract Algebra, Linear Algebra, Number Theory.

Group Theory. 1. Show that Φ maps a conjugacy class of G into a conjugacy class of G.

1 Linear Algebra Problems

(a) II and III (b) I (c) I and III (d) I and II and III (e) None are true.

Remark 1 By definition, an eigenvector must be a nonzero vector, but eigenvalue could be zero.

Solutions of exercise sheet 8

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 10 Nov 2018

Braid Groups, Hecke Algebras, Representations, and Anyons

1. Linear systems of equations. Chapters 7-8: Linear Algebra. Solution(s) of a linear system of equations (continued)

NONCOMMUTATIVE POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS. Edward S. Letzter. Introduction

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

JORDAN NORMAL FORM. Contents Introduction 1 Jordan Normal Form 1 Conclusion 5 References 5

Noetherian property of infinite EI categories

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017

18.S34 linear algebra problems (2007)

ENTRY GROUP THEORY. [ENTRY GROUP THEORY] Authors: started Mark Lezama: October 2003 Literature: Algebra by Michael Artin, Mathworld.

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 27 Oct 2000

Dimension. Eigenvalue and eigenvector

Linear Algebra Practice Problems

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Linear Algebra. Rekha Santhanam. April 3, Johns Hopkins Univ. Rekha Santhanam (Johns Hopkins Univ.) Linear Algebra April 3, / 7

Practice Algebra Qualifying Exam Solutions

Representations. 1 Basic definitions

Problem 1.1. Classify all groups of order 385 up to isomorphism.

January 2016 Qualifying Examination

Math 396. An application of Gram-Schmidt to prove connectedness

Control Systems. Linear Algebra topics. L. Lanari

On the Rothenberg Steenrod spectral sequence for the mod 3 cohomology of the classifying space of the exceptional Lie group E 8

ACI-matrices all of whose completions have the same rank

GALOIS GROUPS AS PERMUTATION GROUPS

Math Matrix Algebra

Algebra Exam Syllabus

Conceptual Questions for Review

COMMUTING PAIRS AND TRIPLES OF MATRICES AND RELATED VARIETIES

Representations and Linear Actions

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS 3

GENERALIZED WATSON TRANSFORMS I: GENERAL THEORY

On orderability of fibred knot groups

What is A + B? What is A B? What is AB? What is BA? What is A 2? and B = QUESTION 2. What is the reduced row echelon matrix of A =

REPRESENTATIONS OF U(N) CLASSIFICATION BY HIGHEST WEIGHTS NOTES FOR MATH 261, FALL 2001

A connection between number theory and linear algebra

ALEXANDER-LIN TWISTED POLYNOMIALS

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5. B : V V k

Representation Theory. Ricky Roy Math 434 University of Puget Sound

Math 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

Properties of Linear Transformations from R n to R m

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

Math Final December 2006 C. Robinson

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Problem 1A. Find the volume of the solid given by x 2 + z 2 1, y 2 + z 2 1. (Hint: 1. Solution: The volume is 1. Problem 2A.

arxiv: v2 [math.gr] 2 Feb 2011

Definition (T -invariant subspace) Example. Example

Eigenvectors. Prop-Defn

Abstract Algebra Study Sheet

(d) Since we can think of isometries of a regular 2n-gon as invertible linear operators on R 2, we get a 2-dimensional representation of G for

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS

Chapter 7. Canonical Forms. 7.1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Chapter 2 Linear Transformations

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

A Little Beyond: Linear Algebra

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2.

CSL361 Problem set 4: Basic linear algebra

Discriminants of Brauer Algebra

Spectrally arbitrary star sign patterns

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

Eigenvectors and Reconstruction

1. In this problem, if the statement is always true, circle T; otherwise, circle F.

235 Final exam review questions

COMPUTING CHARACTER TABLES OF FINITE GROUPS. Jay Taylor (Università degli Studi di Padova)

Contents. Preface for the Instructor. Preface for the Student. xvii. Acknowledgments. 1 Vector Spaces 1 1.A R n and C n 2

Homework 5 M 373K Mark Lindberg and Travis Schedler

1. What is the determinant of the following matrix? a 1 a 2 4a 3 2a 2 b 1 b 2 4b 3 2b c 1. = 4, then det

Foundations of Matrix Analysis

REPRESENTATION THEORY NOTES FOR MATH 4108 SPRING 2012

On the Linearity of Braid Groups

Math 594. Solutions 5

Econ Slides from Lecture 7

UNDERSTANDING THE DIAGONALIZATION PROBLEM. Roy Skjelnes. 1.- Linear Maps 1.1. Linear maps. A map T : R n R m is a linear map if

MATH 320: PRACTICE PROBLEMS FOR THE FINAL AND SOLUTIONS

m We can similarly replace any pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues with 2 2 real blocks. = R

MTH 5102 Linear Algebra Practice Final Exam April 26, 2016

Diagonalization. MATH 322, Linear Algebra I. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

Some notes on linear algebra

Linear Algebra: Characteristic Value Problem

Combinatorial Method in the Coset Enumeration. of Symmetrically Generated Groups II: Monomial Modular Representations

INVARIANT PROBABILITIES ON PROJECTIVE SPACES. 1. Introduction

Question: Given an n x n matrix A, how do we find its eigenvalues? Idea: Suppose c is an eigenvalue of A, then what is the determinant of A-cI?

Numerical Linear Algebra Homework Assignment - Week 2

Linear and Bilinear Algebra (2WF04) Jan Draisma

THE REAL AND THE SYMMETRIC NONNEGATIVE INVERSE EIGENVALUE PROBLEMS ARE DIFFERENT

Representations of the singular braid monoid and group invariants of singular knots

Transcription:

International Journal of Algebra, Vol 5, 2011, no 21, 1011-1020 Pure Braid Group Representations of Low Degree Mohammad N Abdulrahim and Ghenwa H Abboud Department of Mathematics Beirut Arab University PO Box 11-5020, Beirut, Lebanon mna@bauedulb gha009@bauedulb Abstract We determine the conditions under which we extend the irreducible complex specialization of the reduced Gassner representation of the pure braid group, namely G n (z) :P n Gl n 1 (C) to an irreducible representation P n+1 Gl n 1 (C) This is a continuation to Formanek s work regarding the classification of irreducible representations of the braid group Keywords: pure braid group, Gassner representation, irreducible 1 Introduction The pure braid group, P n, is a normal subgroup of the braid group, B n, on n strings It has a lot of linear representations One of them is the Gassner representation which comes from the embedding P n Aut(F n ), by means of Magnus representation [3, p119] According to Artin, the automorphism corresponding to the braid generator σ i takes x i to x i x i+1 x 1 i,x i+1 to x i, and fixes all other free generators Applying this standard Artin representation to the generator of the pure braid group, we get a representation of the pure braid group by automorphisms Such a representation has a composition factor, the reduced Gassner representation G n (t 1,,t n ) : P n GL n 1 (Z[t ±1 1,,t ±1 n ]), where t 1,,t n are indeterminates Unlike the Burau representation of the braid group, B n, that also arises as a subgroup of the automorphism group of a free group with n generators, there is no explicit representation which is agreed to be the reduced Gassner representation of the pure braid group In our work, we define the reduced Gassner representation up to equivalence Specializing the indeterminates t 1,,t n to nonzero complex numbers z 1,,z n, we get a representation G n (z 1,,z n ) : P n GL n 1 (C) = GL(C n 1 ) which is irreducible if and only if z 1 z n 1 (see [1]) It was shown in [4] that the reduced Burau

1012 M N Abdulrahim and G H Abboud representation β n (z) :B n GL n 1 (C) is either irreducible or it has a composition factor of degree n 2 that is irreducible The composition factor is β n (z) :B n GL n 2 (C) =GL(C n 2 ), where β n (z) B n 1 = β n 1 (z) In [2], we get a similar result concerning the pure braid group on 4 strings In that work, we consider the representation G 4 (z 1,,z 4 ):P 4 GL 3 (C) =GL(C 3 ) and we describe the composition factors of G 4 (z 1,,z 4 ) when it is reducible In our paper, we generalize the result obtained in [2] Our immediate goal is to describe the composition factors of G n (z 1,,z n ):P n GL n 1 (C) = GL(C n 1 ) when it is reducible We show that if z 1 1 and z n 1 then G n (z 1,,z n ) has a composition factor of degree n 2, namely, Ĝ n (z 1,,z n ) which is an extension of the irreducible representation G n 1 (z 1,,z n 1 ) to P n In section two, we present the reduced Gassner representation of P n by choosing a free generating set with n generators to be our basis and by applying the Magnus representation as was suggested by J Birman in [3] In section three, we diagonalize the matrix corresponding to some element in P n by an invertible matrix, say T, and conjugate the reduced Gassner representation of P n by the same matrix T Diagonalizing one of the matrices means that the eigen vectors of this diagonal matrix are the standard unit vectors in C n or a linear combination of some of them in case of equal eigenvalues Our objective is to look for invariant subspaces, if exist Then we present our main theorem that shows that if G n (z 1,,z n ):P n GL n 1 (C) =GL(C n 1 ) is reducible, given that z 1 1 and z n 1, then the composition factor Ĝ n (z 1,,z n ):P n GL n 2 (C) =GL(C n 2 ) is an extension of the (irreducible) reduced Gasssner representation G n 1 (z 1,,z n 1 ) to P n and is defined up to equivalence Other observations are made in the cases z 1 =1 and z n =1 2 Definitions Definition 1 The braid group on n strings, denoted by B n, is an abstract group which can be defined via the following presentation: B n =<σ 1,, σ n 1 > and defining relations: σ i σ j = σ j σ i if i j 2 σ i σ i+1 σ i = σ i+1 σ i σ i+1 if 1 i n 2 The generators σ 1,σ 2,, σ n 1 are called the standard generators of B n Definition 2 The pure braid group, denoted by P n, is defined as the kernel of the homomorphism B n S n defined by σ i (i, i +1), 1 i n 1 It is finitely generated by the elements A ij = σ j 1 σ j 2 σ i+1 σ 2 i σ 1 i+1 σ 1 j 2 σ 1 j 1, 1 i<j n

Pure Braid group representations of low degree 1013 These generators have relations among them For more details about the presentations of B n and P n as abstract groups with generators and relations, see [3, pp19 25] Let F n be the free group of rank n, with free basis x 1,, x n In F n, we introduce the free generating set g 1,, g n with g 1 = x 1, g 2 = x 1 x 2,, g n = x 1 x n The action of the braid generators σ i on the basis {g 1,, g n }is defined as follows: σ i : g i g i+1 gi 1 g i 1, i 1 g i g i+1 g 1 i, i =1 g k g k, k i 3 Complex specializations of the reduced gassner representations The action of the pure braid generator, A i,j, on the free basis {g 1,, g n } is defined in the following lemma Lemma 1 Let i<j n and 1 m n Then the action of the pure braid generator is given by the following (i) For i 1, A i,j (g m )= g j g 1 j 1 g ig 1 i 1 g j 1g 1 j g i 1 if m = i g j g 1 j 1 g ig 1 g m i 1 g j 1gj 1 g i 1 gi 1 g m if i<m<j if m<i or m j (ii) A 1,j (g m )= g j g 1 j 1 g 1g j 1 g 1 j if m =1 g j g 1 j 1 g 1g j 1 g 1 j g1 1 g m if 1 <m<j g m if m j Let φ : ZF n Z[t ±1 1,, t ±1 n ], where Z[t ±1 1,, t ±1 n ] is a Laurent polynomial ring in independent variables t 1,, t n φ is defined as φ(g i )=t 1 t i for 1 i n Using Fox derivatives d j defined in [3,p104], we let D j = φd j We then obtain D r (A i,j (g m ))

1014 M N Abdulrahim and G H Abboud (t i 1)(t j δ j 1,r δ j,r )+t j δ i,r + t i (1 t j )δ i 1,r, if m = i = (t i 1)(t j δ j 1,r δ j,r )+(t j 1)(δ i,r t i δ i 1,r )+δ m,r, if i<m<j δ m,r, if m<i or m j Here δ i,j is the Kronecker symbol The Jacobian matrix is defined as follows: D 1 (A i,j (g 1 )) D n (A i,j (g 1 )) J(A i,j )= D 1 (A i,j (g n )) D n (A i,j (g n )) Therefore the image of A i,j, denoted by X ij, is given by X ij = I P i,j Q i,j, where P i,j is the column vector defined by and Q i,j (0,, 0, 1,, 1, 0,, 0 }{{}}{{}}{{} i 1 j i +1 is the row vector defined by ) T Q i,j = (0,, 0,t }{{} i (t j 1), 1 t i t j,t i 1, 0,, 0)ifi = j 1 }{{} i 2 (0,, 0,t }{{} i (t j 1), 1 t j, 0,, 0,t }{{} j (1 t i ),t i 1, 0,, 0)ifi j 1 }{{} i 2 j i 2 We have shown that D r (A i,j (g m )) = δ r,m if m j Hence the last row of these n n matrices X i,j is (0,, 0, 1) This immediately implies that the Gassner representation of P n is reducible and is direct sum of trivial representation and a representation of degree n 1, called the reduced Gassner representation of P n and is denoted by G n (t 1,, t n ) Definition 3 The reduced Gassner representation G n (t 1,, t n ):P n GL n 1 (Z[t ±1 1,, t ±1 n ]) is given by G n (A i,j )=I P i,j Q i,j, where P i,j and Q i,j are the same as P i,j and Q i,j after deleting one zero from the last row of P i,j, and one zero from the last column of Q i,j For simplicity, we still denote the matrix corresponding to the generator A i,j by A i,j

Pure Braid group representations of low degree 1015 4 Composition Factors of G n (z 1,, z n ) We specialize the indeterminantes t 1,, t n to nonzero complex numbers z 1,, z n For z =(z 1,, z n ) (C ) n, it was proved in [1] that the complex specialization of the reduced Gassner representation of P n, namely G n (z) : P n GL n 1 (C), is irreducible if and only if z 1 z n 1 Notation 1 Let A = A 1,n A 1,n 1 A 1,2 be an element of the pure braid group P n Then we get that A = z 1 z n 0 0 0 z 1 z n z 1 z 2 z 1 0 0 z 1 z n z 1 z 2 z 3 0 z 1 0 z 1 z n z 1 z n 1 0 0 z 1 Theorem 1 Given z =(z 1,, z n ) (C ) n and z 1 z n =1 Let G n (z) : P n GL n 1 (C) be the complex specialization of the reduced Gassner representation (i) If z 1 1and z n 1then the irreducible representation G n 1 (z 1,, z n 1 ): P n 1 GL n 2 (C) extends to a (necessarily irreducible) representation Ĝn(z) : P n GL n 2 (C) (ii) If z 1 =1or z n =1then Ĝn(z) :P n GL n 2 (C) is a composition factor of G n (z) that is completely determined and can be reduced further to a representation of lower degree Proof (i) Let z 1 1,z n 1 and A = A 1,n A 1,n 1 A 1,2 be an element of the pure braid group P n Under the substitution z 1 z n = 1, we get that A = 1 0 0 0 1 z 1 z 2 z 1 0 0 1 z 1 z 2 z 3 0 z 1 0 1 z 1 z n 1 0 0 z 1 We then diagonalize this matrix A by the n n matrix T given by

1016 M N Abdulrahim and G H Abboud 1 z 1 0 0 0 0 1 z 1 z n 1 1 z 1 z 2 0 0 0 1 1 z 1 z n 1 1 z 1 z 2 z 3 0 0 1 0 1 z T = 1 z n 1 1 z 1 z n 2 0 1 0 0 1 z 1 z n 1 1 0 0 0 1 It is easy to see that det(t )=( 1) m 1 z 1 [ ] 0, where m = z 1 z n 1 (z n 1) 3n 6 if n is even and m = 3n 7 if n is odd 2 2 Direct computations show that z 1 0 0 0 0 z 1 0 0 T 1 AT = 0 0 z 1 0 0 0 0 1 Now we conjugate the reduced Gassner representation G n (z) by the invertible matrix T to get an equivalent representation of degree n 1 We write the matrices as I (T 1 P i,j )(Q i,j T ),where T 1 P i,j = (0,, 0, 1,, 1, 0,, 0) T,i 1 z } z } j i z } i 1 ( z1zn 1 1,, z1zj 1 z1(z2 zj 1 1),,, 1 z 1 1 z 1 1 z 1 z } z1(z2 1) 1 z 1 z } j 2, 1 z1 zn 1 1 z 1 ) T,i=1 and

Pure Braid group representations of low degree 1017 Q i,j T = (0,, 0,z i 1, 1 z }{{} i z j,z i (z j 1), 0,, 0, 0), j i =1 }{{} i 1 (0,, 0,z i 1,z }{{} j (1 z i ), 0,, 0, 1 z }{{} j,z i (z j 1), 0,, 0, 0), j i 1 }{{} j i 1 i 1 Since the last entry in Q i,j T is zero, it follows that the last column of the matrix T 1 P i,j Q i,j T is (0,, 0) Hence, the subspace generated by the eigenvector e n 1 is invariant under this representation We thus get an (n 2) (n 2) representation Ĝn(z) :P n GL n 2 (C), defined by A i,j = I P i,j Qi,j, where P i,j and Q i,j are the same as T 1 P i,j and Q i,j T after deleting the last row of T 1 P i,j and the last column of Q i,j T By conjugating the (unreduced) Gassner representation P n 1 GL n 1 (C) by the invertible matrix T defined above, we observe that (1, n 1), (2, n 1),, (n 2,n 1) are zeros Therefore we may delete the last row and last column to obtain an (n 2) (n 2) representation We observe that G n 1 (z 1,,z n 1 ) is exactly the representation Ĝn(z) restricted to the subgroup P n 1 Since z 1 z n = 1 and z n 1, it follows that z 1 z n 1 1 which implies the irreducibility of the (n 2) (n 2) matrix representation of P n 1, but irreducibility on the subgroup P n 1 implies irreducibility on the group P n (ii) Case 1: Let z 1 =1 Under the assumption z 1 z n = 1, we get that z 2 z n =1 Substituting in Definition 3, we see that the first row of A 1,j is (z j, 0,, 0) and that of A i,j is (1, 0,, 0) for i 1 Hence the subspace generated by e 2,e 3,, e n 1 is invariant Therefore, we may delete the first row and the first column to obtain an (n 2) (n 2) representation of P n, namely, Ĝ n (z) :P n GL n 2 (C), defined by A 1,j = I n 2, A i,j = I P i,j Qi,j if i 1, where P i,j and Q i,j are the same as P i,j and Q i,j after deleting the first row of P i,j and the first column of Q i,j Thus, G n (z), which is a representation of degree n 1, has a composition factor of degree (n 2), namely Ĝn(z) By replacing the indeterminates in Ĝn(z), namely, z 2,z 3,,z n by w 1,w 2,,w n 1 respectively, we easily observe that w 1 w 2 w n 1 = 1 We also notice that the matrices A i,j = I P i,j Qi,j (i 1) are exactly the same as the matrices A i 1,j 1 that are obtained under the representation G n 1 (w 1,,w n 1 ): P n 1 GL n 2 (C) after replacing z 2 by w 1,and z n by w n 1 Having

1018 M N Abdulrahim and G H Abboud the generators A 1,j = I n 2 and the representation G n 1 (w 1,,w n 1 )is reducible, it follows that the representation Ĝn(z) :P n GL n 2 (C) is reducible Case 2: Let z n =1 We compute A n 1,n under the substitution z 1 z n 1 =1 We see that A n 1,n = ( In 2 0 0 z n 1 ) For 1 i n 2, we notice that the last row of A i,n is (0,, 0,z i ) for i n 1 Likewise, the last row of A i,j is (0,, 0, 1) for j n Hence the subspace generated by e 1,e 2,, e n 2 is invariant Therefore, we delete the last row and the last column to obtain an (n 2) (n 2) representation Ĝn(z) :P n GL n 2 (C), defined by A i,n = I n 2, A i,j = I P i,j Qi,j if j n Here, Pi,j and Q i,j are the same as P i,j and Q i,j after deleting the last row of P i,j and the last column of Q i,j Thus, G n (z) of degree (n 1) has a composition factor of degree (n 2), namely Ĝn(z) Here, we observe that Ĝ n (z) is the extension of G n 1 (z) : P n 1 GL n 2 (C) to P n Since z 1 z n 1 =1, and the fact that A i,n = I n 2, it follows that the representation Ĝn(z) :P n GL n 2 (C) is reducible The previous theorem and its proof motivates the following definition Definition 4 Let n 2 and z =(z 1 z n+1 ) If z 1 z n+1 =1, z 1 1 and z n+1 1 then the irreducible representation Ĝ n+1 (z) :P n+1 GL n 1 (C) is defined as Ĝ n+1 (z)(a i,j )=G n (z 1,,z n )(A i,j ), 1 i<j<n+1,

Pure Braid group representations of low degree 1019 Ĝ n+1 (z)(a 1,n+1 )= z 1 z n+1 0 0 0 z 1 z n+1 (1 z 2 z n 1 ) 1 0 0 z 1 z n+1 (1 z 2 z n 2 ) 0 1 0 z 1 z n+1 (1 z 2 ) 0 0 1, Ĝ n+1 (z)(a n,n+1 )= z n z n+1 z n (1 z n+1 ) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1, and Ĝ n+1 (z)(a i,n+1 )= 1+z n+1 (z i 1) 0 0 0 z n+1 1 z i (1 z n+1 ) 0 0 z n+1 (z i 1) 1 0 0 z n+1 1 z i (1 z n+1 ) 0 0 z n+1 (z i 1) 0 0 1 z n+1 1 z i (1 z n+1 ) 0 0 z n+1 (z i 1) 0 0 0 z n+1 z i (1 z n+1 ) 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 i n 1 References [1] M Abdulrahim, Complex Specializations of the reduced Gassner representation of the Pure Braid group, Proc of AMS, volume 125, Number 6 (1997), 1617-1624

1020 M N Abdulrahim and G H Abboud [2] M Abdulrahim, Gassner Representation of the Pure Braid Group P 4, International Journal of Algebra, volume 3, Number 16 (2009), 793-798 [3] J S Birman, Braids, Links and Mapping Class Groups, Annals of Mathematical studies, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, volume 82 (1975) [4] E Formanek, Braid group representations of low degree, Proc London Math Soc, volume 73, Number 3 (1996), 279-322 Received: April, 2011