River Ice Delineation with RADARSAT SAR

Similar documents
Monitoring the ice cover evolution of a medium size river from RADARSAT-1 : preliminary results

Ice Observations on the Churchill River using Satellite Imagery

U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, New Hampshire

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ICE JAM PREDICTOR WITH USER INTERFACE

ESTIMATION OF THE HYDRAULIC ROUGHNESS OF RIVER ICE USING DATA ASSIMILATION

Great Lakes Update. Background

VIDEO/LASER HELICOPTER SENSOR TO COLLECT PACK ICE PROPERTIES FOR VALIDATION OF RADARSAT SAR BACKSCATTER VALUES

Basic cloud Interpretation using Satellite Imagery

Ice Phenomena on the Lower Vistula

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

2012 USACE Drought Actions

EFFECTS OF ICE ON THE HYDRAULICS OF INNER MONGOLIA REACH OF THE YELLOW RIVER

A MODEL FOR RISES AND DOWNS OF THE GREATEST LAKE ON EARTH

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Assessment of the Hood River Delta Hood River, Oregon

SEA ICE STRENGTH DURING THE MELT SEASON

Evaluating the Discrete Element Method as a Tool for Predicting the Seasonal Evolution of the MIZ

Colorado Ice Jams and CRREL s Ice Jam Database CRREL Ice Engineering Group

British Colombia Knight Inlet Strait of Georgia Strait of Juan de Fuca

Inter State Large Navigable Rivers of the United States

Summary of the 2017 Spring Flood

THE INVESTIGATION OF SNOWMELT PATTERNS IN AN ARCTIC UPLAND USING SAR IMAGERY

Module 2, Investigation 4: Log 1 Our coasts

Great Lakes Update. Volume 194: 2015 Annual Summary

2015 Fall Conditions Report

Great Lakes Update. Volume 191: 2014 January through June Summary. Vol. 191 Great Lakes Update August 2014

A Preliminary Severe Winter Storms Climatology for Missouri from

DATA ASSIMILATION IN RIVER ICE FORECASTING

River Current Resource Assessment and Characterization Considering Ice Conditions

!"#$%&' #(!()* +,-'.,$ &%!/(%)!'%

Great Lakes Update. Volume 199: 2017 Annual Summary. Background

Hydrologic Forecast Centre Manitoba Infrastructure, Winnipeg, Manitoba. FEBRUARY OUTLOOK REPORT FOR MANITOBA February 23, 2018

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 1, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

Drilling Holes in Ice to Reduce Ice Jam Potential

Integrating Weather Forecasts into Folsom Reservoir Operations

January 25, Summary

EOS Direct Broadcast Real-Time Products for the US National Weather Service

Souris River Basin Spring Runoff Outlook As of March 1, 2019

Monitoring of Arctic Conditions from a Virtual Constellation of Synthetic Aperture Radar Satellites

Hydrologic Forecast Centre Manitoba Infrastructure, Winnipeg, Manitoba. MARCH OUTLOOK REPORT FOR MANITOBA March 23, 2018

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Determination of the NDSI index and cloud mask algorithm (The Case Study: Sepidan Region, Iran)

Great Lakes Update. Great Lakes Winter and Spring Summary January June Vol. 187 Great Lakes Update August 2012

Weather Outlook: 2015 Growing Season

Modeling of peak inflow dates for a snowmelt dominated basin Evan Heisman. CVEN 6833: Advanced Data Analysis Fall 2012 Prof. Balaji Rajagopalan

Great Lakes Update. Volume 193: 2015 January through June Summary. Vol. 193 Great Lakes Update August 2015

Ice Thickness Prediction: A Comparison of Various Practical Approaches

UNDERSTANDING GREAT LAKES WATER LEVEL FLUCTUATIONS AND CURRENT CONDITIONS APRIL 2013

Great Lakes Update. Volume 188: 2012 Annual Summary

Using ArcGIS for Hydrology and Watershed Analysis:

Meteorological Satellite Image Interpretations, Part III. Acknowledgement: Dr. S. Kidder at Colorado State Univ.

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: February 15, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.2 OBJECTIVE

Urban Growth Analysis: Calculating Metrics to Quantify Urban Sprawl

Monitoring and Change Detection along the Eastern Side of Qena Bend, Nile Valley, Egypt Using GIS and Remote Sensing

Presented by Larry Rundquist Alaska-Pacific River Forecast Center Anchorage, Alaska April 14, 2009

Operation of the Lake Erie Niagara River Ice Boom

Badger Flood Situation Report. Robert Picco Amir Ali Khan Ken Rollings. Department of Environment Water Resources Management Division

Section 5. Low-Gradient Streams. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

The Seasonal Evolution of Sea Ice Floe Size Distribution

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

Impacts of the April 2013 Mean trough over central North America

The Seasonal Evolution of Sea Ice Floe Size Distribution

Preliminary Runoff Outlook February 2018

Wave processes in Arctic Seas, observed from TerraSAR-X

IMPORTANCE OF SATELLITE DATA (FOR REANALYSIS AND BEYOND) Jörg Schulz EUMETSAT

Radar mapping of snow melt over mountain glaciers in High Mountain Asia Mentor: Tarendra Lakhankar Collaborators: Nir Krakauer, Kyle MacDonald and

Seasonal Summary. Great Lakes Winter By the North American Ice Service

2016 Fall Conditions Report

Snow Cover Applications: Major Gaps in Current EO Measurement Capabilities

Mid-West Heavy rains 18 April 2013

LAND USE LAND COVER, CHANGE DETECTION OF FOREST IN KARWAR TALUK USING GEO-SPATIAL TECHNIQUES

Remote Sensing. Ice and Snow

Changing Marine Access in the Arctic Ocean: The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment Panama Canal Authority 11 January 2005

Thanksgiving Snow and Arctic Front 25 November 2005 By Richard H. Grumm National Weather Service State College, PA 16801

Bishopville Prong Study

Hydrodynamic model of St. Clair River with Telemac-2D Phase 2 report

Monitoring Sea Ice with Space-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar

Feasibility study: Use of Sigma 0 and radar images to extract and classify roads in Central Africa. Progress Reports

2017 January Conditions Report Manitoba Hydrologic Forecasting and Coordination Branch Manitoba Infrastructure

ASSESSMENT OF RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION USING REMOTE SENSING SATELLITE IMAGERIES

Aerial Surveys in the Wenatchee River Basin Thermal Infrared and Color Videography

Great Lakes Information Network GIS (Queryable by topic, geography, organization, and upload date 73 layers as of October, 2009)

Remote Sensing of SWE in Canada

Application of Wavelet Spectrum Analysis to Oil Spill Detection by Using Satellite Observation Data

Hydrologic Forecast Centre. Manitoba Infrastructure. Winnipeg, Manitoba FEBRUARY FLOOD OUTLOOK REPORT FOR MANITOBA.

Joint Hydrographic Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Durham, NH 03824, USA

TCC News 1 No. 29 Summer 2012

Appendix G. Meso-Habitat Surveys. DRAFT Annual Technical Report

APPENDIX A M&T/Llano Seco Long-Term Water Reliability Study These photos are examples of rock spurs in use throughout the United States

Land Use MTRI Documenting Land Use and Land Cover Conditions Synthesis Report

River ice-jam modelling in MESH. Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt Prabin Rokaya, Luis Morales-Marín, Howard Wheater

Assessing Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Sediment, Nitrogen and Phosphorous Loading in the Missouri River Basin (MORB)

EFFECT OF TURBULENCE INTENSITY ON FRAZIL FORMATION

Satellites, Weather and Climate Module??: Polar Vortex

Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat Mapping Study in the Upper and Middle Susitna Basin Study Plan Section 11.5

Introducing IMS. v) Select the Zoom to Full Extent tool. Did you return to the original view?

Isabelle Thériault Hydro-Québec 855 Sainte-Catherine Est Montréal (Québec) Canada, H2X 3P4

ICE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA COLLECTION FOR THE NORTH CASPIAN SEA

Transcription:

CGU HS Committee on River Ice Processes and the Environment 12th Workshop on the Hydraulics of Ice Covered Rivers Edmonton, AB, June 19-20, 2003 River Ice Delineation with RADARSAT SAR Brian T. Tracy and Steven F. Daly U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineer Research Development Center Cold Regions Research Engineering Lab (CRREL) 72 Lyme Road Hanover, New Hampshire USA 03755-1240 brian.t.tracy@crl02.usace.army.mil steven.f.daly@erdc.usace.army.mil The use of satellite imagery to identify and delineate river ice is influenced by the spatial resolution and electromagnetic properties of the sensor, climatic conditions, and river channel geometry. This project expands previous research applications of LANDSAT, AIRSAR, and ERS-1 imagery to delineate river ice by utilizing RADARSAT Fine Beam Mode SAR imagery. RADARSAT data were acquired at three sites in the winter of 2002 and the winter of 2003: the Mississippi River at Mel Price Lock and Dam to identify the extent of ice in a navigable waterway; the Missouri River at Bismarck, ND, to identify ice conditions downstream of a hydropower dam; and the Red Lake River near Grand Forks, ND, where an extended ice jam flood record exists. These sites provided a range of conditions suitable for RADARSAT imagery to detect river ice. The widths varied from 1500 meters for the Mississippi River; 600 meters for the Missouri River, to 60 meters for the Red Lake River. The RADARSAT Fine Beam imagery at 10-meter resolution was able to identify ice in all six images, and open water in three images. Remote cameras or direct ice survey provided ground truth to identify the existence of ice and support the delineation of ice with RADARSAT data.

1. Introduction An extensive body of remote sensing literature using satellite imagery to identify sea and freshwater lake ice exists (Carsey 1989, Hall 1998, others), but the operational monitoring of river ice with satellite remote sensing has a limited history. The difficulty of detecting river ice with visible and infrared satellite sensors under cloudy winter conditions, coarse spatial resolution (greater than10 meters), and infrequent acquisitions (greater than 10 days) has contributed to this limitation. The C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite, RADARSAT- 1, has day-and-night and all-weather imaging capability, fine spatial resolution (10 meters), and can acquire images of the same location 3 out of 4 days (RADARSAT International (RSI) 1999). A request for image acquisition can be submitted to RADARSAT International (RSI) five days prior to acquisition (during emergency situations and emergency programming, the satellite can be tasked 29-60 hours prior to the acquisition). RADARSAT imagery has shown promise for monitoring river ice (Weber et al. 2001), and for flood delineation mapping applications by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Tracy and Bruzewicz 1999) and internationally (IJC 2000). The application and evaluation of RADARSAT image data to detect river ice are being addressed concurrently in Canadian research projects (Gauthier et al. 2001, Gauthier et al. 2002, Weber et al. 2001). In this project, we acquired six RADARSAT images of three sites in the winters of 2002 and 2003 to explore the suitability of using RADARSAT data to detect river ice conditions. The three sites we selected varied in river widths and type of ice cover. 2. Approach Used in 2002 and 2003 Site Selection and Image Acquisition Due to a mild winter and limited ice cover in 2002, we chose to acquire RADARSAT data at three sites: the Mississippi River near St. Louis, Missouri to identify the extent of ice in a navigable waterway; the upper Missouri River to identify ice conditions downstream of a hydropower dam at Bismarck, North Dakota; and Red Lake River where an extended ice jam flood record exists near Grand Forks, North Dakota. During the winter of 2003 we acquired imagery at the same sites (see Table 1 for the dates and times of all acquisitions). In order to acquire an image of river ice we followed the forecasted temperatures, contacted the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) district office for river and ice conditions, and worked with RADARSAT International (RSI) for the availability of acquisition when ice existed or was expected to exist on the three rivers.

Table 1. Information on Image Acquisition RADARSAT Image Information Ice Conditions River Date UTC Time UTC Date Local Time Local Beam Mode Asc/Dsc Width x 10 2 m Open % Ice % Mississippi 09 Jan 02 23:59:26 09 Jan 02 17:59:26 37 Fine 1 Ascending 5-20 70 30 26Jan 03 12:00:30 26 Jan 03 06:00:30 42 Fine 2 Descending 0 100 Missouri 05 Feb 02 0:43:34 04 Feb 02 18:43:34 45 Fine 5 Ascending 4-10 23 77 07 Jan 03 0:43:10 06 Jan 03 18:43:10 45 Fine 5 Ascending 79 21 Red Lake 19 Mar 02 0:18:39 18 Mar 02 18:18:39 37 Fine 1 Ascending.40-.75 0 100 28 -Feb 03 0:26:30 27 Feb 03 18:26:30 46 Fine 4 Ascending 0 100 Processing Methods The acquired images were visually analyzed and digitally classified (unsupervised) to identify open water, moving ice floes, and stationary ice covers. The river reaches for each of the rivers were delineated, subset, and then the classification procedure focused directly on the river reaches. The delineation of river channel was undertaken by two approaches. In the rivers with narrower channel widths (Missouri River and Red Lake River), the reaches were delineated manually by digitizing the imagery. In the wider Mississippi River channel, a band-ratio procedure of LANDSAT TM data was used to establish a land/water boundary to create an image mask of the river channel only. The channel mask was derived from the ratio of Band 2, in the visible green (0.52-0.60 µm) portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, and Band 5 is in the mid-infrared (1.55-1.75 µm) portion of the spectrum. The band-ratio procedure created a land/water boundary, and was used to subset the SAR image. It provided a way to extract the river channel only, and not include vegetated islands. The digitizing method requires additional steps to extract the channel only, and not the vegetated islands. Once the channel reach was determined the SAR image was subset, a variant texture analysis process was applied, and then an unsupervised classification. The texture analysis procedure provides more clustering of pixels and separation of pixels interpreted as forms of ice. In both procedures, the river channel would be digitally subset from the rest of the image for classification and analysis of ice conditions. 3. Mississippi River at St. Louis, Missouri A 64 km reach of the Mississippi River was studied between Lock and Dams 25 and 26 (L&D), which is adjacent to St. Louis, Missouri. Lock 25 is upstream of Lock 26, and the confluence of the Illinois River is approximately 30 km downstream from L&D 25. The range of channel width of the Mississippi River in this reach is 500-2000 meters. The Illinois River is approximately 300 meters wide at its confluence with the Mississippi River. 2002 In the RADARSAT image, we detect ice in the pool behind L&D 25, in low flow areas of the Illinois and Mississippi River, and a stream of ice originating from the Illinois River into the Mississippi River (Figure 1). The pattern from this ice stream is followed from the Illinois River

through L&D 26 (Mel Price L&D) downstream of the Missouri River confluence, to the Chain of Rocks Canal and L&D 27. At the time of RADARSAT acquisition (1759 local time), a full day of solar heating contributed to ice melting and introduction of ice into the stream flow. Our objective was to determine the sources and distribution of ice, and the amount/area of ice impacting the navigation channel. On this digital image the ice patterns were initially a visual detection. In order to identify and quantify the amount of ice and open water, the variant texture analysis process and the unsupervised classification steps were applied using the image processing software, ERDAS Imagine. In the classification process, six classes were extracted and each class assigned a color to produce a color-coded image. The classification results included the identification of ice and water, and also a number of non-water and non-ice features in the river channel, ie, barges and bridge crossings were mis-classified as shore ice. Open water is identifiable in the SAR image (black) as were barge traffic within the channel and near the Lock and Dam. The process identified 18% of the river channel as brash ice (an accumulation of floating ice fragments), 12% of the river channel as sheet ice or shore ice, and 70% open water. An example of the unsupervised classification is displayed in Figure 2 with the brash ice and shore ice classes displayed. The unsupervised classification highlights brash ice flowing in the channel. In this case the brash ice may have broken up due to the warming temperatures. Illinois River Mississippi River Missouri River Mel Price L&D #26 Figure 1. A subscene of the RADARSAT image with an ice stream entering the Mississippi River from the Illinois River. Image acquired on January 9, 2002 at 1759 local time.

Illinois River Mississippi River Missouri River Mel Price L&D #26 Figure 2. The same image as Figure 1, but with the classification overlain to indicate brash ice in blue and shore ice in green. Note accumulation of ice at the Lock and Dam in lower right corner. 2003 Beginning in late December 2002 and continuing into February 2003, parts of the northern United States had below freezing temperatures, which resulted in rivers freezing over completely. The 2003 RADARSAT image was acquired in the morning on January 26, 2003 (0600) (Fig. 3). In this image sheet ice, border ice, and brash ice (probably due to ice-breaking for navigation) can be detected. The procedure was used in the 2002 imagery was applied to this imagery, and the results are shown in Figure 4. Illinois River Mississippi River Missouri River Mel Price L&D #26 Figure 3. A subscene of the RADARSAT image with an ice cover on the Mississippi River. Image acquired on January 26, 2003 at 0600 local time.

Illinois River Mississippi River Missouri River Mel Price L&D #26 Figure 4. The same image as Figure 3, but with the classification overlain to indicate brash ice classified in blue, and border and sheet ice in green. Border ice and sheet ice cover were identified in reaches where navigation ice-breakers did not break up the river ice. In reaches where the navigation ice-breakers did traverse (the main channel of the Mississippi River) and ice refroze, the variant texture analysis and unsupervised classification method defined the path (blue in Fig. 4) and provided an indication of sheet ice (green in Fig. 4). The classification identified 39% of the river channel having brash ice, and 61% of the channel with sheet ice. 4. Missouri River at Bismarck, North Dakota The Missouri River is the intermediate-sized (400-1000 meters wide) river of the three rivers. The area of interest for this acquisition is downstream of the hydroelectricity-producing Garrison Dam on the Missouri River at Bismarck, North Dakota. 2002 A subscene of the RADARSAT image, acquired on February 4, 2002 (1843 local time, ascending mode), is shown in Figures 5 and 6. The river channel was extracted by manual delineation the Missouri River channel, and not by the band ratio method. The patterns detected in Figure 6 are the result of the variant texture analysis and unsupervised classification procedure indicating open water leads (red), ice cover/wet ice (green), and rough ice (blue) in the channel. Analysis and classification of the RADARSAT image did not clearly identify open water to the extent as in the 2002 Mississippi River image. However, open water leads were most prominent at the outside of channel bends of the river (where flow velocity increases and is turbulent), where tributaries enter the main channel, and at channel constrictions due to in-stream islands. The classification identified 23% open water, and 62% ice cover, and 15% rough ice.

Bismarck, ND Bismarck, ND 8A 8B Figure 5 and 6. Subscenes of RADARSAT image acquired on February 5, 2002 (1800 local time) at Bismarck, ND. The patterns detected indicate open water leads (red), ice cover/wet ice (green), and rough ice (blue) in the channel. 2003 In the winter of 2003, a request to RADARSAT International (RSI) was submitted for image acquisition of the Bismarck, ND reach of the Missouri River on January 7 (1843 local time, ascending mode) with an expectation of ice conditions. However, temperatures were not consistently low enough in the region to cause consistent ice development at this time. The RADARSAT image that we acquired did not indicate significant ice conditions. A subscene of the RADARSAT image is shown in Figure 7. The reduced amount of ice in the flow was also evident from a CRREL web-camera that was established at Bismarck to view river conditions (webcam.crrel.usace.army.mil/bismarck/ ). This web-camera provides an hourly real-time image of the channel reach between the second and third bridge crossings in Figure 7. According to imagery from the web-cam, an ice cover on the river began three days after the RADARSAT image acquisition. The river channel was extracted by manual delineation of the Missouri River channel, and not by the band ratio method. The patterns detected in Figure 8 are the result of the

Figure 7 and 8. Subscenes of RADARSAT image acquired on February 5, 2002 (1800 local time) at Bismarck, ND. The patterns detected indicate open water leads (red), ice cover/wet ice (green), and rough ice (blue) in the channel variant texture analysis and unsupervised classification procedure indicating open water (red), floating ice (green), and rough ice (blue) in the channel. The classification identified 62% open water, and 18% floating ice, and 20% rough ice. However, there were miss-classified pixels (due to the limitation of manual digitizing the channel) in the floating ice and rough ice classes. Many of these pixels were vegetated islands in the channel. To correct for miss-classification, and adding these pixels into the open water class, an estimate is established: 79% open water, 9% floating ice, and 12% rough ice. 5. Red Lake River near Grand Forks, North Dakota The Red Lake River has a channel width of 40-75 meters wide, steep vegetated banks, is very sinuous, and the smallest of the three rivers. 2002 & 2003 RADARSAT images were acquired on 18 March 02 (1818 local time, ascending mode) and on 27 March 03 (1826 local time, ascending mode) of the Red Lake River, near its confluence with the Red River of the North at Grand Forks, North Dakota (Figure 9a-d). In Figures a and c, an overview of the study reach is presented. In Figures b and d, a subset reach has been enlarged to full resolution to show the level of detail within the study reach. In both SAR images open water is not clearly identifiable due to ice cover and narrow channel width. However, ice cover was determined by a field reconnaissance ice surveys implemented by the USACE St. Paul, Minnesota district office. The narrow channel width limited the channel delineation procedure;

the band ratio method did not identify water in the channel, and the channel boundaries were difficult to identify when applying the digitizing method. These are limitations that need to be addressed in order to identify river ice in channels that are less than 100 meters wide. 9a 9c 9b 9d Figure 9a-d. RADARSAT imagery of Red Lake River at confluence with Red River of the North, Grand Forks, ND. The image pair on left (9a & b) are from winter 2002, and the image pair on right (9c & d) are from winter 2003.

6. Summary In this project, we acquired six RADARSAT images of three sites in the winters of 2002 and 2003 to explore the suitability of using RADARSAT data to detect river ice conditions. The three sites we selected varied in river widths and ice conditions. In the Mississippi River imagery near St. Louis, Missouri, the wide channel width (500-2000 meters) contributed to identifying river ice with RADARSAT imagery. In the 2002 image it was determined that 30% of the channel had ice in the flow, and in the 2003 image, it was determined that there was 100% ice cover. Additionally, this ice cover was separated into forms of ice; brash ice and border ice. In the 2003 image it is believed that the brash ice formed as a result of navigation ice-breaking activities. In the Missouri River imagery near Bismarck, ND, the channel width (400-1000 meters) was suitable to delineate, and river ice was determined from the RADARSAT imagery. In the 2002 image it was determined that 77% of the channel had ice in the flow, and in the 2003 image, only 21% of the channel had ice. The imagery acquired in 2003 was prior to full icing conditions, and a small amount of ice was interpreted to exist. In the Red Lake River imagery near the confluence with the Red River of the North at Grand Forks, ND, the river channel is narrow (40-75 meters). The narrowness of the channel limited the process of delineating the channel boundary on the imagery. As a result of the narrow channel width, river ice was not determined by this process. However, ice surveys were conducted by the US Army Corps of Engineers during the time of image acquisitions, and an ice cover was recorded in both 2002 and 2003. 7. References and Cited Literature Carsey, F., 1989. Review and Status of Remote Sensing of Sea Ice. IEEE J. Oceanic Engineering, 14(2):127-138. Gauthier, Y., A. El Battay, T.B.M.J. Ouarda, and M. Bernier, 2002. Monitoring River Ice from RADARSAT data for the Development of an Ice Jam Early Warning System. INRS-Eau, Universite du Quebec, Quebec, Canada, personal communication. Gauthier, Y., T.B.M.J. Ouarda, M. Bernier and A. El Battay, 2001. Monitoring Ice Cover Evolution of a Medium Size River from RADARSAT-1: Preliminary Results. Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on River Ice, Comm. on River Ice Processes and the Environment (CGU-HS), May 14-16, 2001, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario. Hall, D., 1998. Remote Sensing of Snow and Ice Using Imaging Radar. In: Principles and Applications of Imaging Radar- Manual of Remote Sensing, 3rd Edition, Vol. 2 Henderson and Lewis (eds.), J. Wiley and Sons, pp 677-703.

International Joint Commission (IJC), 2000. The Next Flood: Getting Prepared. International Red River Basin Task Force, Washington DC and Ottawa, Ontario. RADARSAT International, 1999. RADARSAT Illuminated: Your Guide to Products and Services. Tracy, B.T. and Bruzewicz, A.J.,1999. Temporal and Fiscal Evaluation of Two Methods to Delineate Flooding with a SAR Sensor. International Symposium on Spectral Sensing Research, Las Vegas, Nevada. Weber, F., D. Nixon, and J. Hurley, 2001. Identification of River Ice Types on the Peace River using RADARSAT-1 Imagery. Proceeding of the 11th Workshop on River Ice, Comm. on River Ice Processes and the Environment (CGU-HS). May 14-16, 2001, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.