SECTION IV ASSESSING VULNERABILITY AND RISK

Similar documents
Baldwin County, Alabama

RISK ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY PROFILE NATURAL HAZARDS COMMUNITY RISK PROFILES. Page 13 of 524

KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RISK ASSESSMENT

5.2. IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

B.2 Sources for Hazard Identification, Profiling, and Ranking (Section 3) Overview of Sussex County s History of Hazards

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Miami-Dade County Overview

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

From Vulnerability to Resilience And the Tools to Get There. Out of Harm s Way Partnership for the Delaware Estuary August 1, 2012

SECTION 6 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

4.1 Hazard Identification: Natural Hazards

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Table G - 6. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Kent ( ) (From Wilkin County Master Mitigation Action Chart)

RISK ASSESSMENT IDENTIFYING HAZARDS

United States Multi-Hazard Early Warning System

A HURRICANE IS COMING. Presented by Atiba Upchurch Broward Emergency Management Division

West Carroll Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 25, 2015 Oak Grove, LA

Southington. Challenges

Bossier Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 10, 2016 Bossier City, LA

HAZUS-MH: Earthquake Event Report

The Tampa Bay Catastrophic Plan Presentation to CFGIS Users Group FDOT District 5 Urban Offices - Orlando July 30, 2010

Assumption Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. September 1, 2015 Napoleonville, LA

IMPLEMENTING GOVERNMENT-WIDE ENTERPRISE GIS; THE FEDERATED MODEL

Chippewa County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan

On Page 1, following Paragraph 2 of the Planning Participants subsection, insert the following: 2012 Committee members included:

West Hollywood General Plan

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Flood Hazard Zone Modeling for Regulation Development

Interpretive Map Series 24

Summary of Available Datasets that are Relevant to Flood Risk Characterization

Advisory Committee Meeting December 5, 2012

Earthquakes. & Expansive Soils

West Baton Rouge Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. September 9, 2015 Port Allen, LA

Rainfall-River Forecasting: Overview of NOAA s Role, Responsibilities, and Services

Jim Fox. copyright UNC Asheville's NEMAC

Madison County Hazard Mitigation

STEUBEN COUNTY, NEW YORK. Hazard Analysis Report

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

Hurricane Readiness for Coastal Communities

Aid to Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources During a Disaster. Pete Grandgeorge MidAmerican Energy Company

Timeframe. Crow Wing County, Baxter, Brainerd, Breezy Point, Crosby, Crosslake, Cuyuna, Deerwood, Emily, Fifty

Erin Mack Ashley, PhD, LEED AP Diana Castro, PE

Catastrophic Events Impact on Ecosystems

The Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) by Local Governments. Giving municipal decision-makers the power to make better decisions

Page G Crow Wing County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2017

The Coastal Change Analysis Program and the Land Cover Atlas. Rebecca Love NOAA Office for Coastal Management

2014 Russell County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update STAKEHOLDERS AND TECHNICAL ADVISORS MEETING 2/6/14

NOAA s National Weather Service. National Weather Service

Climate Risk Visualization for Adaptation Planning and Emergency Response

APPLICATIONS OF EARTHQUAKE HAZARD MAPS TO LAND-USE AND EMERGENCY PLANNING EXAMPLES FROM THE PORTLAND AREA

STATE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DATABASE

Pre-Disaster Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Guilford, Connecticut History of Hazard Mitigation Planning Authority Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (ame

John Laznik 273 Delaplane Ave Newark, DE (302)

CITY OF RIVERSIDE USING HAZUS TO CREATE A EARTHQUAKE PLANNING GUIDE FOR A UNIFIED FIELD RESPONSE

3Chapter Three: Rescue and Response

Storm Surge/Coastal Inundation State of the Union. Jamie Rhome Storm Surge Team Lead NOAA/National Hurricane Center

Geographic Information Systems(GIS)

Geospatial natural disaster management

SECTION 4 - RISK ASSESSMENT

Assessing Hazards and Risk

A GEOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF MAJOR DISASTER DECLARATIONS ACROSS THE LOWER 48 STATES

Appendix C Fluvial Flood Hazards

THE USE OF GEOSPATIAL DATA TO SUPPORT VULNERABILITY MAPPING OF THE OREGON COAST. Kelvin Raiford MS Candidate Geography Department of Geosciences

2014 Annual Mitigation Plan Review Meeting

The AIR Bushfire Model for Australia

2006 & 2007 Pre-Hurricane Scenario Analyses

GIS and Remote Sensing Support for Evacuation Analysis

Disaster Risk Assessment: Opportunities for GIS and data management with Open DRI

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A TORNADO STRIKES THE COMMUNITY? Carroll County Sheriff s Office Emergency Management

Flood Scenario Worksheet

LAND USE PLANNING AND RISK: LESSONS FROM THREE AUSTRALIAN PORT CITIES

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION... 1 HAZARD EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE... 2 OVERVIEW OF HAZARD ANALYSIS... 4 BUILDING VALUES... 5 POTENTIAL DOLLAR LOSSES...

Assessing Social Vulnerability to Biophysical Hazards. Dr. Jasmine Waddell

Semester Project Final Report. Logan River Flood Plain Analysis Using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, and HEC-RAS

Oregon APA Legal Issues Workshop December 7, Tricia Sears, DLCD With information from Bill Burns, DOGAMI

Exploring the costs of sea level rise: should we focus on means or extremes?

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 5-1. Risk Assessment and Hazard Mapping. CLUSTER 5: Hazard and Risk Information and Decision Making. Public Disclosure Authorized

4.4 Assessing Vulnerability: Estimating Potential Losses

The Leader in Landscape Solutions

COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM

DOWNLOAD OR READ : GIS BASED FLOOD LOSS ESTIMATION MODELING IN JAPAN PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUTOFF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Use of Geospatial data for disaster managements

COLLEGE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND COMMUNITY SERVICE School of Public Administration Emergency Services Program Bachelor of Science in Emergency Management

3.1: Identifying Hazards. Introduction

APPENDIX D: Hazard Summary Matrices

Village of Giltner. Hamilton County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING IN SOUTH CENTRAL CONNECTICUT. Association of State Floodplain Managers Conference June 13, 2013 Hartford, CT

Outline of Guideline for Development and Utilization of Tsunami Disaster Management Map

Layers (Layers in italics indicate group layers.) MyHazards MyPlan* Floods and Drought Landslides - USGS

Joseph E. Boxhorn, Ph.D., Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission #

Table-Top Exercise for Emergency Preparedness Evaluation: Little Anse, Isle Madame

The Delaware Environmental Observing System

INDIANAMAP VIEWING APPLICATION

Data Dictionary Hudson River Features: Estuary shoreline Flood scenario Emergency Services: Police stations Fire stations EMS

Kentucky Collaborates in GeoMAPP Project: The Advantages and Challenges of Archiving in a State with a Centralized GIS

Daily Operations Briefing Wednesday, April 5, :30 a.m. EDT

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

Transcription:

SECTION IV ASSESSING VULNERABILITY AND RISK

Describing vulnerability in terms of potential dollar loss provides the local government, the State and the federal government with a common framework with which to quantitatively measure the effects of hazards on the community and more accurately determine the benefit-cost ratio of investments in mitigation activities. It is an essential component to risk assessment and the ability to implement a strategy to prevent or reduce future losses. In Florida, it is a vital tool for decision-makers who must make the sometimes difficult decisions regarding growthmanagement, land development regulations, and funding for infrastructure and mitigation projects. Data Source Reference - Natural Hazards, Table 4.2, and Data Source Reference Man-Made Hazards, Table 4.3, list available data for hazards identified in this document. A. RISK ANALYSIS In this section the hazards, listed in Chapter 3 that affect Hillsborough County are defined in terms of the potential risk to population, property and cost of reconstruction. For each hazard a map has been created and the respective analysis performed by way of a multi-faceted approach that is described in the following Methodology portion of this section. One of the improved aspects of this update is the implementation of new resources used for the analysis. New Resources One of the major aspects of the 2015 update to the is the utilization of many new resources. One of these major sources is from the Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal (SouthWRAP) to conduct wildfire assessment. The complete results of the 50 page analysis are found in Appendix P of this LMS document. This is considered a major asset of the plan being that Hillsborough County has a significant Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) and therefore needs to address mitigation techniques to prepare for wildfires. As a means of citation for the various resources used for the risk analysis, Table 4.1 is provided on the following page. The table cites the various resources used and their respective web site URL for future reference purposes. Page IV-2

Table 4.1: Risk Analysis Resources Risk\Threat Data Source URL Year Civil Disturbance Department of Homeland Security https://www.llis.dhs.gov/topics/terrorist-attacks-civil-disturbances 2014 Coastal Oil Spill Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/ 2014 Coastal - Riverine Erosion Florida Department of Environmental Protection http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/data/index.htm 2014 Dam\Levee Failure USACE National Levee Database http://www.usace.army.mil/missions/civilworks/leveesafetyprogram/nationalleveedatabase.aspx 2014 Drought US Drought Portal http://gis.ncdc.noaa.gov/map/drought/us.html#app=cdo 2014 Exotic Pests Florida Invasive Species Partnership http://www.floridainvasives.org/ 2014 http://www.eddmaps.org/florida/distribution/ Extreme Temperature National Climate Data Center http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ 2014 Flooding FEMA Flood Map Service Center https://msc.fema.gov/portal 2014 Hazardous Material Spill Florida Division of Emergency Management http://www.floridadisaster.org/emtools/hazmat/ 2014 National Transportation Safety Board http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/databases.html 2014 Hurricanes NWS National Hurricane Center http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/ 2014 Infrastructure Disruption\Utility Failure Florida Public Service Commission http://www.psc.state.fl.us/utilities/electricgas/index.aspx 2014 Hillsborough County Public Utilities http://www.hillsboroughcounty.org/index.aspx?nid=1810 2014 Mass Migration US Customs and Border Protection http://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/media-resources/stats?title=border%2bpatrol%2bstatistics 2014 Nuclear Power Plant USNRC List of Power Reactor Units http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/list-power-reactor-units.html 2014 Pandemic Centers for Disease Control - FluAid http://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/tools/fluaid.htm 2014 Port Vessel Collision NOAA - Port Tomorrow Planning Tool http://www.csc.noaa.gov/port/ 2014 Sinkholes Florida Department of Environmental Protection http://www.dep.state.fl.us/geology/gisdatamaps/sinkhole_database.htm 2014 Special Events Hillsborough County Sheriff - Tampa Police No specific database 2014 Terrorism Department of Homeland Security https://www.llis.dhs.gov/topics/terrorist-attacks-civil-disturbances 2014 Thunderstorm National Climate Data Center http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ 2014 Tornadoes National Climate Data Center http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ 2014 Transportation Incident National Transportation Safety Board http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/databases.html 2014 Tsunami National Geophysical Data Center http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazard/tsu.shtml 2014 http://www.tsunamiready.noaa.gov/ts-communities.htm Volcano National Geophysical Data Center http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazard/tsu.shtml 2014 Wildfire Southern Wildfire Risk Analysis Portal http://www.southernwildfirerisk.com/ 2014 Winter Storm National Climate Data Center http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ 2014 Page IV-3

B. METHODOLOGY The hazard risk analysis for Hillsborough County was performed under a dual methodology approach. As a means of replacement of the MEMPHIS data utilized in the 2009 Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS), two independent analysis were utilized in the 2015 update. These analysis were subsequently evaluated for a comparison in determination of the risk severity for Hillsborough County. The two separate analysis include a risk analysis performed utilizing data obtained from the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser and one performed using the FEMA risk analysis tool, HAZUS. Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Data s and Structures The first hazard analysis was performed using data maintained by the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. The Geomatics Section of Hillsborough County Public Works in cooperation with the Hazard Mitigation Section established a matrix of parameters (see matrix and other risk tables at the end of this section) which was used to both establish the current conditions in Hillsborough County as well as the expected threat conditions the County might face. Current conditions were identified by separating existing structures by occupancy and usage (i.e. single family residential, mobile home, multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial, etc.) These classifications were subsequently broken down into temporal periods based on revisions of the building codes historically in use in the State of Florida and Hillsborough County. This timeline resulted in eight (8) separate time categories ranging from those structures built prior to 1980 to those constructed within 2015 up until the date the analysis was run in March of 2015; thereby allowing a very current estimate of the data. Separating the construction periods based on date ranges allows for a discrete evaluation based on what building codes were in effect at the time of construction. In doing so allows for precise evaluation for specific dates such as those structure built prior to the inception of the Florida Code in 2001 (effective March 1, 2002), the date in 2004 when Florida Product Approval first was implemented, changes in the wind speed maps of the Florida Code including changes to the Wind Bone Debris Region (WBDR) and finally aspects such as the most recent implementation of structures being rated based on Risk Category and the resultant higher wind construction specifications required for structures of greater risk (i.e. greater significance to the community). In addition to the separation of the matrix based on the occupancy of structures and the date of construction, the matrix allows for the analysis based on distinctive types of construction including the materials and engineering used for the structural components of the building as well as the roof design of the structures. In its entirety, the matrix establishes discrete conditions for eight (8) unique building uses\occupancies; eight (8) time frames of construction separated by years of respective building code implementation; six (6) different classifications of wall\structural methods by which Page IV-4

the building is comprised and five (5) unique roofing types classified by design and components used to construct the roof. By establishing a complex series of possible combinations, the data; all of which is current and maintained by the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser, allows for very precise and distinct evaluation of the current conditions of Hillsborough County based on specific evaluation of the structures found in Hillsborough County and not an tire broad-based approach of grouping that could lead to erroneous assumptions. The thought process behind an elaborate risk matrix being that two structures in close geographic vicinity could undergo different effects of any given risk event (wind, flood, etc.) based on the time they were built. Comparatively, two structures in close geographic vicinity with different roof types could undergo different effects from any given risk event even though they may have been constructed under the same building code. While the basic parameters of the Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) may not always require such distinctive and discrete evaluation, the concept behind such precision established at this point allows for future development and enhancement as needs arise. Municipalities and Geography A critical distinction of the matrix identification of structures is the geographic separation of where a structure is located including identification of being within the municipalities incorporated as part of the 2015 LMS update. These municipalities in addition to unincorporated Hillsborough County include; the City of Tampa, the City of Temple Terrace and the City of Plant City. The distinction of the data set as described in the matrix is identical for each of the municipalities as it was detailed previously for Hillsborough County. This separation allows for a discrete evaluation of structures within each respective municipality as well as the larger countywide area. In addition to separation by municipality, a geographical aspect was incorporated into the matrix. This geographical separation was established with parameters including the isotachs (lines of equal wind speed) established by the Florida Code to determine respective wind speed for construction standards. Eight (8) unique regions were created including those within the Wind-Borne Debris Region (WBDR), outside of the WBDR, and areas within additional wind speed rating areas ranging from 130 mph to 150 mph. These parameters are effective for evaluating structures based on possible hurricane or high wind events. In order to address possible flood concerns, geographic regions were established and incorporated into the matrix. These regions include areas based on hurricane storm surge flooding for all of the respective hurricane categories from 1 through 5. Areas identified as National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Repetitive Loss are also identified as well as those identified as being at risk for potential erosion. Both coastal erosion, areas within the FEMA NFIP V-zone (velocity zone) as well as areas identified as riverine erosion are classified. Once again, all of these geographical separation can be individually evaluated by municipality for both a wind and\or flood event. Page IV-5

Other Risks One of the most basic yet important results of creating a risk analysis using in-house data is the ability to evaluate for risks that might not otherwise be available for study in a pre-packaged risk analysis tool. Hillsborough County has gone to great lengths to incorporate additional risk above and beyond the traditional natural hazards risks commonly identified in a Local Mitigation Strategy. These include hazards such as sinkholes, hazardous chemical spills from both fixed facilities and transportation routes and dam or levee failures for the human-made water retention structures found within the County. Utilizing the same matrix provides the ability to not only identify the number of homes within a given municipality that might be affected but also determine the date of construction for the quantity of those given structures. Parameters such as this are critical in determining how some structures and their respective occupants may endure any given event. This is especially critical in a no-notice event such as a chemical spill or sinkhole where advance warning and preparation such as those made during the time before a hurricane can be done. HAZUS As a means of both secondary information as well as a comparison to the hazard analysis performed using Hillsborough County Property Appraiser data, the HAZUS software was utilized to run an analysis of Hillsborough County. Two separate HAZUS reports were generated. The first was obtained from the State of Florida Department of Emergency Management portal. A HAZUS report entitled HAZUS_Probabilistic_Hurricane_Assessment_Summary was generated by Richard Butgereit on 11/6/2014 and placed in the Hillsborough County file for usage. This 206 page report was downloaded as a PDF and its contents reviewed for analysis. Subsequently, a HAZUS analysis was run on April 2, 2015 by Hillsborough County. Conducting a second HAZUS analysis allowed for several measures to be achieved including confirmation of both similarities and differences between the two HAZUS analysis as well as a control measure method for the analysis generated by the results from the usage of the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser data. In addition, having multiple HAZUS reports generated allowed for an update of the data results based on the February 6, 2015 release of the new HAZUS-MH 2.2 and subsequent updated data sets which accompanied the release. Being that the first HAZUS report was generated on 11/6/2014, members of the Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group decided that multiple analysis might provide a better means of evaluation should any of the data have changed. Page IV-6

C. Risk Analysis Quantitative Data The aforementioned risk analysis produced a significant amount of quantitative data. The following tables provide an example of the numerical data derived from the analysis. These tables were the results from the evaluation run from the large matrix developed which was described in the aforementioned Methodology section. All of these tables have been included at the end of this section as some spreadsheets are of considerable size and warrant larger page size dimensioning. D. Risk Analysis Maps The following pages contain the collection of maps derived from the risk analysis conducted for Hillsborough County. Numerous maps were created and this comprehensive set graphically depict the results from the risk analysis matrix that was developed as part of Hillsborough County s risk analysis methodology described earlier. The map element in this section have been classified by their design classification. These classifications result in five (5) major map categories including, census based maps, community maps, critical facilities, hazard vulnerability and structural maps based on geography. Census Based Maps The maps in this section depict the data associated with a particular set of residents of Hillsborough County. This data was deemed vital during the 2015 LMS update as one of the goals of the update was to identify how vulnerable populations might be addressed as part of the mitigation strategy. Knowing where individuals of vulnerable populations resided within Hillsborough County was the first step in being able to address their needs when facing any respective risk. Page IV-7

FIGURE 4.1: AGED 65 AND OVER DENSITY FIGURE 4.2: DISABLED DENSITY Page IV-8

FIGURE 4.3: LANGUAGE ISOLATION DENSITY FIGURE 4.4: MINORITY DENSITY Page IV-9

FIGURE 4.5: POVERTY DENSITY FIGURE 4.6: SINGLE PARENT DENSITY Page IV-10

FIGURE 4.7: TOTAL POPULATION DENSITY Page IV-11

Community Maps Community maps represent those elements that make-up the social, environmental and infrastructure components of Hillsborough County. Providing a graphical representation of these items aids in disseminating the information to the citizens of what comprises the characteristics of the County. In doing so, the disciplines of planning, mitigation and resiliency can be presented. FIGURE 4.8: PLAN AREAS, OVERLAY AND SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Page IV-12

FIGURE 4.9: MUNICIPALITIES AND COMMUNITY AREAS FIGURE 4.10: EXISTING LAND USES Page IV-13

FIGURE 4.11: FUTURE LAND USES - JURISDICTIONS FIGURE 4.12: FUTURE LAND USES UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH CO. Page IV-14

FIGURE 4.13: GREENWAY TRAILS FIGURE 4.14: ROADS AND RAILROADS Page IV-15

FIGURE 4.15: SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT FIGURE 4.16: WETLANDS AND WATER BODIES Page IV-16

Critical Facilities Maps Critical facilities maps are those maps that depict the geographical location of those facilities and structures which play vital roles in the daily operations of the County. These can include locations such as communication centers, transportation hubs, law enforcement stations and even schools; many of which may serve as evacuation shelters in time of an emergency event. FIGURE 4.17: AIRPORTS Page IV-17

FIGURE 4.18: COMMUNICATIONS FIGURE 4.19: FEDERAL AND STATE FACILITIES Page IV-18

FIGURE 4.20: FIRE AND RESCUE FACILITIES FIGURE 4.21: HOSPITAL AND CLINIC FACILITIES Page IV-19

FIGURE 4.22: LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITIES FIGURE 4.23: LOCAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES Page IV-20

FIGURE 4.24: NURSING HOMES, HOSPICE AND ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES FIGURE 4.24.1: SCHOOLS Page IV-21

FIGURE 4.25: SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) FACILITIES Page IV-22

Hazard Vulnerability Maps The hazard vulnerability maps depict those risks; both natural and human-made that can pose a threat to the citizens of Hillsborough County. The graphical as well as geospatial presentation of these risks in an illustrative format is vital to residents understanding the risks they may face based on their location within the County. Having the risk analysis presented in the form of a map can be extremely effective in conveying the risk analysis message. FIGURE 4.30: HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RISK BOUNDARIES Page IV-23

FIGURE 4.31: SINKHOLE WITH 1 MILE BUFFER FIGURE 4.31.1: SINKHOLE AREA BY COVER LAYER Page IV-24

FIGURE 4.32: DAM AND LEVEE LOCATION AND INUNDATION AREA FIGURE 4.33: REPETITIVE FLOOD LOSS DENSITY Page IV-25

FIGURE 4.34: WILDFIRE RISK FIGURE 4.35: KARST GEOLOGY Page IV-26

FIGURE 4.36: MUCK SOILS FIGURE 4.37: NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) FLOODZONES Page IV-27

FIGURE 4.38: RAILROADS 1 MILE BUFFER FIGURE 4.39: RIVERINE AND COASTAL EROSION Page IV-28

FIGURE 4.40: SHIPPING CHANNEL 2 MILE BUFFER FIGURE 4.41: STORM SURGE SIGNS Page IV-29

FIGURE 4.42: STORM SURGE CHEMICAL SITES FIGURE 4.43: TRUCK ROUTES 1 MILE BUFFER Page IV-30

FIGURE 4.44: URBAN SERVICE AREAS FIGURE 4.45: WIND MAP OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE HISTORICAL ISOTACHS Page IV-31

FIGURE 4.45.1: DANGEROUS ANIMALS Page IV-32

FIGURE 4.46: WIND BORNE DEBRIS REGION Page IV-33

FIGURE 4.47: EVACUATIONS ZONES 1 & 2 Page IV-34

FIGURE 4.48: EVACUATION ZONES 3, 4 & 5 Page IV-35

Structural Maps The final section of maps of the 2015 is comprised of structural maps. These maps depict the various occupancy type structures (i.e. residential, commercial, etc.) within the spatial context of the geography of Hillsborough County. Included in this spatial relationship are characteristics such as the date the structure was built and its location in regards to the wind speed lines established by the Florida Code. Developing a visual tool of this spatial and temporal relationship allows for users of the LMS to determine what areas of the County might be affected by any given risk or threat event based on the location of the event in the region. This series of maps also is delineated by each of the municipalities within the Hillsborough County area. FIGURE 4.49: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BUILD DATE Page IV-36

FIGURE 4.50: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CRITICAL FACILITIES FIGURE 4.51: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Page IV-37

FIGURE 4.52: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY GOVERNMENT & INSTITUTIONAL FIGURE 4.53: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INDUSTRIAL Page IV-38

FIGURE 4.54: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY MOBILE HOMES FIGURE 4.55: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY MULTI-FAMILY Page IV-39

FIGURE 4.55.1: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SINGLE FAMILY FIGURE 4.56: CITY OF TAMPA BUILD DATE Page IV-40

FIGURE 4.57: CITY OF PLANT CITY BUILD DATE FIGURE 4.58: CITY OF TEMPLE TERRACE BUILD DATE Page IV-41

E. RISK ANALYSIS RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROGRAMS Emergency Management Standard by the Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP) The Emergency Management Standard by the Emergency Management Accreditation Program is designed as a tool for continuous improvement as part of voluntary accreditation. The City of Tampa and the Office of Emergency Management of unincorporated Hillsborough County are working to achieve this certification throughout 2015 and 2016. While the information contained within the 2015 Local Mitigation Strategy update will be beneficial in the efforts to achieve EMAP certification, the impact results of the risk analysis are unchanged by the certification process. Urban Strategic Initiative Area (UASI) & Threat Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) The Urban Strategic Initiative Area and Threat Hazard Identification Risk Assessment; both FEMA sponsored programs, work to address common risk assessment process that helps the whole community including individuals, businesses, faith-based organizations, nonprofit groups, schools and academia and all levels of government understand its risks and estimate capability requirements. While the information contained within the 2015 Local Mitigation Strategy update will be beneficial in the efforts to for UASI and THIRA implementation, the impact results of the risk analysis are unchanged by the participation in these two endeavors. Page IV-42

F. SECTION IV: SOURCES AND OTHER INFORMATION Primary data sourcing includes the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. Additional data used is referenced in Table 4.1 on page IV-3. 1. SECTION IV: FIGURES AND TABLES Table 4.1 Hazard Analysis Reference Table IV-3 Figure 4.1 Aged 65 and Over Density IV-8 Figure 4.2 Disabled Density IV-8 Figure 4.3 Language Isolation Density IV-9 Figure 4.4 Minority Density IV-9 Figure 4.5 Poverty Density IV-10 Figure 4.6 Single Parent Density IV-10 Figure 4.7 Total Population Density IV-11 Figure 4.8 Plan Areas, Overlays and Special Zoning Districts IV-12 Figure 4.9 Municipalities and Community Areas IV-13 Figure 4.10 Existing Land Uses IV-13 Figure 4.11 Future Land Uses Jurisdictions IV-14 Figure 4.12 Future Land Uses Unincorporated Hillsborough County IV-14 Figure 4.13 Greenway Trails IV-15 Figure 4.14 Roads and Railroads IV-15 Figure 4.15 Significant Wildlife Habitat IV-16 Figure 4.16 Wetlands and Water Bodies IV-16 Figure 4.17 Airports IV-17 Figure 4.18 Communications IV-18 Figure 4.19 Federal and State Facilities IV-18 Figure 4.20 Fire and Rescue Facilities IV-19 Figure 4.21 Hospital and Clinic Facilities IV-19 Figure 4.22 Law Enforcement Facilities IV-20 Figure 4.23 Local Government Facilities IV-20 Figure 4.24 Nursing Homes, Hospice and Assisted Living Facilities IV-21 Figure 4.24.1 Schools IV-21 Figure 4.25 SWFWMD Facilities IV-22 Figure 4.30 Hazardous Materials Risk Boundaries IV-23 Figure 4.31 Sinkhole With 1 Mile Buffer IV-23 Figure 4.31.1 Sinkhole Area by Cover Layer IV-24 Figure 4.32 Dam and Levee Location and Inundation Area IV-25 Figure 4.33 Repetitive Flood Loss IV-25 Figure 4.34 Wildfire Risk IV-26 Figure 4.35 Karst Geology IV-26 Figure 4.36 Muck Soils IV-27 Figure 4.37 National Flood Insurance Program Floodzones IV-27 Figure 4.38 Railroads 1 Mile Buffer IV-28 Figure 4.39 Riverine and Coastal Erosion IV-28 Figure 4.40 Shipping Channel 2 Mile Buffer IV-29 Figure 4.41 Storm Surge Signs IV-29 Figure 4.42 Storm Surge Chemical Sites IV-30 Page IV-43

Figure 4.43 Truck Routes 1 Mile Buffer IV-30 Figure 4.44 Urban Service Areas IV-31 Figure 4.45 Wind Map of Florida Code Historical Isotachs IV-31 Figure 4.45.1 Dangerous Animals IV-32 Figure 4.46 Wind Borne Debris Region IV-33 Figure 4.47 Evacuation Zones 1 & 2 IV-34 Figure 4.48 Evacuation Zones 3, 4 & 5 IV-35 Figure 4.49 Hillsborough County Build Date IV-36 Figure 4.50 Hillsborough County Critical Facilities IV-37 Figure 4.51 Hillsborough County Commercial Properties IV-37 Figure 4.52 Hillsborough County Government & Institutional IV-38 Figure 4.53 Hillsborough County Industrial IV-38 Figure 4.54 Hillsborough County Mobile Homes IV-39 Figure 4.55 Hillsborough County Multi-Family IV-39 Figure 4.55.1 Hillsborough County Single Family IV-40 Figure 4.56 City of Tampa Build Date IV-40 Figure 4.57 City of Plant City Build Date IV-41 Figure 4.58 City of Temple Terrace IV-41 Page IV-44

2. SECTION IV: DATA TABLES The following pages contain all the data tables created as part of the matrix development described in the Methodology section. Some tables are of considerable size so varying page dimensions occur. Page IV-45

Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - (Hillsborough County - Unincorporated) s Totals Total Values PA Class Code: A PA Class Code: B PA Class Code: C PA Class Code: D PA Class Code: S PA Class Code: Other Roof Type: Concrete Roof Type: Flat or Shed Roof Type: Hip or Gable Roof Type: Irregular Roof Type: Truss or Frame SF Res Pre-1980 73494 $4,360,065,346 0 0 64303 8788 135 4 2 756 72353 336 47 1981-1991 48047 $4,101,646,904 0 0 40301 7591 69 0 3 93 47732 204 15 1992-1998 26479 $3,111,539,953 0 0 25144 1255 27 0 0 20 26436 13 10 1999-2001 16617 $2,073,742,025 1 0 15994 595 5 0 0 7 16600 4 6 2002-2004 21730 $2,540,021,569 0 0 20865 829 7 0 1 4 21713 5 7 2005-2009 28021 $3,373,727,693 0 0 27035 955 11 0 0 61 27950 8 2 2010-2011 4545 $588,354,895 0 0 4459 80 2 2 0 2 4543 0 0 2012-2015 8103 $460,769,632 0 0 7920 123 1 53 0 3 8094 3 3 Mobile Home Pre-1980 9296 $67,345,531 0 0 15 9079 127 31 1 5519 3651 32 93 1981-1991 5908 $92,189,877 0 0 12 5800 61 2 0 971 4892 0 44 1992-1998 3040 $78,380,473 0 0 5 3002 17 2 0 129 2893 0 18 1999-2001 1675 $55,968,908 0 0 2 1657 3 3 0 31 1635 0 9 2002-2004 1057 $35,599,697 0 0 2 1049 0 0 0 38 1017 0 2 2005-2009 859 $31,438,037 0 0 0 851 3 0 0 18 834 0 7 2010-2011 116 $4,527,373 0 0 0 114 2 0 0 4 111 0 1 2012-2015 106 $1,761,653 0 0 1 101 3 1 0 10 94 0 2 Multi-Family Res Pre-1980 10939 $603,578,564 0 0 8639 2233 19 0 13 1292 8197 1094 343 1981-1991 12441 $1,146,024,829 0 0 7773 4632 18 0 444 482 10783 60 672 1992-1998 2891 $503,389,583 0 0 1447 1439 1 1 346 7 2355 0 183 1999-2001 3551 $696,898,807 0 0 880 2665 1 0 2 4 3291 0 254 2002-2004 1390 $324,431,703 0 0 1101 282 1 0 0 1 1365 0 24 2005-2009 1829 $439,020,343 0 0 1573 253 0 0 0 7 1719 50 53 2010-2011 164 $88,946,542 0 0 61 101 0 0 0 4 145 0 15 2012-2015 174 $74,761,404 0 2 93 78 0 0 0 8 155 0 11 Agricultural Pre-1980 1981-1991 1992-1998 1999-2001 2002-2004 2005-2009 2010-2011 2012-2015 Commercial Pre-1980 3519 $403,007,279 4 0 2198 714 555 1 27 210 637 6 2639 1981-1991 1715 $833,400,445 15 4 1255 175 229 0 16 17 68 0 1614 1992-1998 531 $488,563,918 4 0 396 84 35 0 17 9 13 0 492 1999-2001 441 $483,908,236 3 0 329 76 25 0 7 0 13 1 420 2002-2004 497 $295,914,266 1 0 433 35 23 0 1 2 3 1 490 2005-2009 1038 $641,428,240 3 0 925 68 32 0 10 1 13 1 1013 2010-2011 60 $48,689,455 1 0 46 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 60 2012-2015 108 $29,729,131 12 1 72 16 6 0 0 1 8 0 99 Industrial Pre-1980 1285 $367,595,397 2 0 618 102 548 0 68 5 10 0 1202 1981-1991 1006 $536,820,648 5 0 659 21 309 0 7 9 2 1 987 1992-1998 177 $119,702,729 0 0 98 3 72 0 5 1 0 0 171 1999-2001 276 $246,761,164 0 0 160 11 100 0 0 1 0 0 275 2002-2004 176 $79,950,745 0 0 83 5 85 0 2 1 0 0 173 2005-2009 328 $282,679,900 0 0 160 3 162 0 1 0 0 0 327 2010-2011 26 $8,157,044 0 0 10 7 9 0 0 0 0 0 26 2012-2015 19 $2,372,910 3 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 19 Critical Facilities Pre-1980 138 $183,998,697 0 1 75 33 25 0 15 5 10 0 108 1981-1991 64 $35,092,118 0 0 45 9 6 0 11 4 4 0 45 1992-1998 20 $188,157,568 0 0 14 3 2 0 1 1 3 0 15 1999-2001 13 $77,689,655 3 2 6 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 11 2002-2004 37 $99,387,175 0 0 35 1 0 0 5 1 1 0 30 2005-2009 50 $215,860,595 0 0 47 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 46 2010-2011 4 $18,021,954 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2012-2015 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre-1980 1906 $538,016,548 4 0 1409 348 94 0 28 19 502 3 1354 1981-1991 791 $342,546,697 2 0 597 90 71 0 7 12 107 1 664 1992-1998 232 $216,284,901 2 0 166 24 20 0 0 5 26 0 201 1999-2001 166 $135,812,986 1 0 96 17 43 0 1 2 19 0 144 2002-2004 202 $224,166,570 0 0 101 39 18 0 3 4 17 0 178 2005-2009 205 $241,443,465 0 0 152 20 17 0 0 0 28 0 177 2010-2011 41 $30,877,961 0 0 24 4 3 0 0 0 11 0 30 2012-2015 46 $18,637,940 5 0 36 1 3 0 0 0 6 0 40 2015 1

Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - (City of Tampa) s Totals Total Values PA Class Code: A PA Class Code: B PA Class Code: C PA Class Code: D PA Class Code: S PA Class Code: Other Roof Type: Concrete Roof Type: Flat or Shed Roof Type: Hip or Gable Roof Type: Irregular Roof Type: Truss or Frame SF Res Pre-1980 63256 $3,269,756,194 0 0 40433 22729 9 2 1 1736 61288 181 50 1981-1991 6406 $731,782,919 0 0 4871 1529 1 0 0 99 6276 28 3 1992-1998 4960 $852,498,709 0 0 4287 670 0 0 0 53 4897 5 5 1999-2001 3889 $698,115,152 0 0 3452 431 1 0 0 74 3814 1 0 2002-2004 4893 $813,959,316 0 0 4442 443 3 0 0 324 4567 1 1 2005-2009 6581 $1,245,509,541 0 0 6123 455 0 0 1 537 6041 1 1 2010-2011 947 $209,894,767 1 0 871 74 0 0 0 11 935 1 0 2012-2015 1767 $141,485,491 0 0 1645 120 0 2 1 35 1727 4 0 Mobile Home Pre-1980 918 $7,424,135 0 0 0 912 6 0 0 668 227 0 23 1981-1991 55 $859,840 0 0 1 52 2 0 0 18 24 0 13 1992-1998 24 $693,849 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 7 13 0 4 1999-2001 32 $839,098 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 2 22 0 8 2002-2004 26 $1,151,180 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 3 23 0 0 2005-2009 18 $456,223 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 7 11 0 0 2010-2011 3 $68,513 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2012-2015 3 $30,247 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 Multi-Family Res Pre-1980 6993 $585,891,586 0 0 5494 1480 3 0 462 2158 3961 193 219 1981-1991 7123 $812,235,429 0 0 5251 1850 0 0 367 1180 5339 76 161 1992-1998 2481 $397,055,004 0 0 484 1996 0 0 238 11 2197 0 35 1999-2001 3054 $355,339,470 0 0 67 2986 0 0 0 47 2997 0 10 2002-2004 1086 $197,709,934 0 0 418 668 0 0 1 119 949 0 17 2005-2009 3841 $1,085,462,278 5 0 3486 346 0 3 1960 725 1039 3 114 2010-2011 121 $89,394,137 0 0 87 33 0 1 23 1 91 1 5 2012-2015 95 $19,002,357 0 4 66 23 0 0 12 16 64 0 3 Agricultural Pre-1980 1981-1991 1992-1998 1999-2001 2002-2004 2005-2009 2010-2011 2012-2015 Commercial Pre-1980 4831 $990,824,519 13 6 3733 736 273 0 75 59 269 7 4421 1981-1991 1207 $1,482,176,297 29 34 909 83 134 0 92 0 6 1 1108 1992-1998 270 $395,614,598 2 2 217 23 18 0 12 1 0 0 257 1999-2001 206 $391,077,196 2 1 143 40 13 0 12 2 4 0 188 2002-2004 179 $123,352,893 1 0 150 15 11 0 2 0 0 0 177 2005-2009 328 $372,077,093 4 2 272 23 19 0 25 2 0 0 301 2010-2011 51 $36,117,345 0 0 41 5 3 0 5 0 0 0 46 2012-2015 72 $16,648,557 6 2 54 2 6 0 1 0 0 0 71 Industrial Pre-1980 1221 $279,492,026 0 0 732 66 377 0 37 3 6 0 1175 1981-1991 403 $106,258,114 0 0 204 8 180 1 1 0 3 0 399 1992-1998 64 $12,946,420 0 0 19 3 37 0 4 1 0 0 59 1999-2001 69 $19,438,861 0 0 42 2 24 0 0 0 0 0 69 2002-2004 33 $6,687,432 0 0 10 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 33 2005-2009 76 $16,867,932 0 0 23 1 52 0 0 0 0 0 76 2010-2011 12 $11,693,365 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 2012-2015 5 $3,004,160 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 Critical Facilities Pre-1980 217 $370,245,905 1 0 170 12 29 0 47 26 17 1 126 1981-1991 16 $48,271,164 0 0 12 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 13 1992-1998 7 $64,782,312 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 1999-2001 7 $27,517,485 0 0 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 2002-2004 5 $28,899,766 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2005-2009 7 $12,891,052 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2010-2011 2 $122,673 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2012-2015 6 $0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre-1980 1856 $926,943,507 3 0 1383 235 77 0 123 37 195 3 1498 1981-1991 381 $707,632,506 1 0 277 30 34 0 56 8 24 2 291 1992-1998 121 $287,897,283 0 0 80 5 21 0 11 1 3 0 106 1999-2001 84 $406,471,249 2 0 58 6 5 0 17 2 3 0 62 2002-2004 132 $205,363,032 1 1 59 19 1 0 9 4 22 0 97 2005-2009 133 $148,672,078 1 1 58 31 12 0 4 0 48 0 81 2010-2011 29 $24,426,076 0 0 23 2 2 0 1 0 4 0 24 2012-2015 22 $41,091,963 1 1 20 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 17 2015 2

Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - (City of Plant City) s Totals Total Values PA Class Code: A PA Class Code: B PA Class Code: C PA Class Code: D PA Class Code: S PA Class Code: Other Roof Type: Concrete Roof Type: Flat or Shed Roof Type: Hip or Gable Roof Type: Irregular Roof Type: Truss or Frame SF Res Pre-1980 4128 $152,398,175 0 0 2380 1719 1 0 0 40 4078 9 1 1981-1991 2080 $152,385,313 0 0 1861 218 0 0 0 1 2078 1 0 1992-1998 1201 $98,502,539 0 0 1060 139 1 0 0 1 1196 0 4 1999-2001 557 $47,612,100 0 0 547 10 0 0 0 0 557 0 0 2002-2004 443 $30,784,440 0 0 425 18 0 0 0 0 443 0 0 2005-2009 877 $73,501,944 0 0 862 15 0 0 0 0 877 0 0 2010-2011 105 $10,996,231 0 0 102 3 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 2012-2015 217 $8,874,887 0 0 214 3 0 0 0 2 215 0 0 Mobile Home Pre-1980 158 $1,791,834 0 0 0 157 1 0 0 83 62 0 13 1981-1991 34 $498,108 0 0 0 32 2 0 0 11 21 0 2 1992-1998 7 $186,813 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 1999-2001 5 $85,442 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 2002-2004 3 $53,733 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2005-2009 2 $57,697 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2010-2011 2 $79,678 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2012-2015 2 $0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Multi-Family Res Pre-1980 298 $13,673,202 0 0 258 38 1 0 0 24 263 0 11 1981-1991 326 $42,062,881 0 0 167 159 0 0 0 3 314 0 9 1992-1998 118 $18,043,907 0 0 105 13 0 0 0 0 117 0 1 1999-2001 91 $26,330,445 0 0 70 20 0 0 0 0 88 0 3 2002-2004 5 $342,724 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2005-2009 10 $774,743 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 2010-2011 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012-2015 8 $0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 Agricultural Pre-1980 1981-1991 1992-1998 1999-2001 2002-2004 2005-2009 2010-2011 2012-2015 Commercial Pre-1980 391 $44,640,154 0 0 292 62 26 0 8 7 31 0 345 1981-1991 110 $29,435,362 0 0 79 19 11 0 0 1 4 1 104 1992-1998 42 $22,374,593 0 0 31 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 42 1999-2001 16 $11,901,410 0 0 11 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 14 2002-2004 21 $17,589,234 1 0 14 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 21 2005-2009 45 $20,673,278 0 0 32 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 45 2010-2011 6 $1,661,885 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 2012-2015 5 $1,588,537 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 Industrial Pre-1980 131 $30,041,075 0 0 56 7 66 0 2 0 2 0 127 1981-1991 102 $81,481,293 0 0 28 2 71 0 1 0 0 0 101 1992-1998 41 $49,372,020 0 0 11 1 28 0 0 0 0 0 41 1999-2001 21 $25,521,123 0 0 6 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 21 2002-2004 16 $8,254,465 0 0 1 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 16 2005-2009 13 $7,848,531 0 0 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 13 2010-2011 2 $299,484 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2012-2015 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Facilities Pre-1980 21 $18,596,451 0 0 15 2 2 0 3 3 0 0 15 1981-1991 4 $21,944,113 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1992-1998 4 $7,018,400 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1999-2001 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2004 1 $358,093 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2005-2009 7 $1,543,124 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 2010-2011 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012-2015 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre-1980 234 $67,861,770 0 0 163 25 21 0 3 2 32 0 197 1981-1991 55 $19,000,139 0 0 34 2 9 0 1 0 6 0 48 1992-1998 12 $7,176,472 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 10 1999-2001 9 $1,660,010 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 8 2002-2004 10 $10,517,137 0 0 6 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 9 2005-2009 20 $8,723,606 0 0 17 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 18 2010-2011 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012-2015 1 $1,407,735 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2015 3

Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - (City of Temple Terrace) s Totals Total Values PA Class Code: A PA Class Code: B PA Class Code: C PA Class Code: D PA Class Code: S PA Class Code: Other Roof Type: Concrete Roof Type: Flat or Shed Roof Type: Hip or Gable Roof Type: Irregular Roof Type: Truss or Frame SF Res Pre-1980 3050 $264,274,702 0 0 2891 158 1 0 0 79 2961 9 1 1981-1991 1590 $157,725,142 0 0 1253 337 0 0 0 2 1587 1 0 1992-1998 159 $23,709,731 0 0 149 10 0 0 0 1 158 0 0 1999-2001 236 $20,686,844 0 0 229 6 1 0 0 1 235 0 0 2002-2004 154 $19,242,691 0 0 143 11 0 0 0 0 154 0 0 2005-2009 348 $37,223,154 0 0 326 22 0 0 0 34 314 0 0 2010-2011 9 $1,184,570 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 2012-2015 36 $2,061,670 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 Mobile Home Pre-1980 3 $50,268 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1981-1991 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1992-1998 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999-2001 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2004 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005-2009 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2011 1 $17,461 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2012-2015 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Multi-Family Res Pre-1980 796 $57,896,804 0 0 791 5 0 0 0 24 752 0 20 1981-1991 965 $76,598,772 0 0 381 584 0 0 0 168 789 0 8 1992-1998 368 $14,687,052 0 0 0 368 0 0 0 0 368 0 0 1999-2001 417 $30,429,038 0 0 9 408 0 0 0 0 414 0 3 2002-2004 2 $8,947,744 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2005-2009 243 $20,458,230 0 0 2 241 0 0 0 0 239 0 4 2010-2011 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012-2015 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agricultural Pre-1980 1981-1991 1992-1998 1999-2001 2002-2004 2005-2009 2010-2011 2012-2015 Commercial Pre-1980 84 $31,026,855 0 0 76 7 1 0 2 0 3 0 79 1981-1991 78 $75,519,838 3 1 70 3 1 0 3 0 14 0 61 1992-1998 22 $31,719,216 0 0 15 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 20 1999-2001 16 $31,500,423 0 0 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 2002-2004 24 $7,459,372 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2005-2009 60 $34,077,949 0 0 57 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 2010-2011 1 $1,048,349 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2012-2015 8 $683,354 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Industrial Pre-1980 1 $291,659 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1981-1991 9 $6,390,895 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 1992-1998 2 $892,836 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1999-2001 2 $608,716 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2002-2004 5 $1,287,696 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 2005-2009 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2011 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012-2015 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Facilities Pre-1980 9 $12,532,487 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 1981-1991 3 $603,165 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1992-1998 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999-2001 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2004 2 $4,035,467 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2005-2009 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010-2011 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012-2015 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre-1980 64 $34,371,846 0 0 57 3 4 0 5 1 5 1 52 1981-1991 8 $11,000,723 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 1992-1998 4 $3,534,060 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1999-2001 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2004 1 $415,794 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2005-2009 7 $1,670,103 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 5 2010-2011 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012-2015 0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2015 4

Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - Hillsborough County - Unincorporated s Totals Total Values SF Res Tampa Plant City Temple Terrace Totals Total Values Totals Total Values Totals Total Values Pre-1980 73494 $4,360,065,346 63256 $3,269,756,194 4128 $152,398,175 3050 $264,274,702 1981-1991 48047 $4,101,646,904 6406 $731,782,919 2080 $152,385,313 1590 $157,725,142 1992-1998 26479 $3,111,539,953 4960 $852,498,709 1201 $98,502,539 159 $23,709,731 1999-2001 16617 $2,073,742,025 3889 $698,115,152 557 $47,612,100 236 $20,686,844 2002-2004 21730 $2,540,021,569 4893 $813,959,316 443 $30,784,440 154 $19,242,691 2005-2009 28021 $3,373,727,693 6581 $1,245,509,541 877 $73,501,944 348 $37,223,154 2010-2011 4545 $588,354,895 947 $209,894,767 105 $10,996,231 9 $1,184,570 2012-2015 8103 $460,769,632 1767 $141,485,491 217 $8,874,887 36 $2,061,670 Mobile Home Pre-1980 9296 $67,345,531 918 $7,424,135 158 $1,791,834 3 $50,268 1981-1991 5908 $92,189,877 55 $859,840 34 $498,108 0 $0 1992-1998 3040 $78,380,473 24 $693,849 7 $186,813 0 $0 1999-2001 1675 $55,968,908 32 $839,098 5 $85,442 0 $0 2002-2004 1057 $35,599,697 26 $1,151,180 3 $53,733 0 $0 2005-2009 859 $31,438,037 18 $456,223 2 $57,697 0 $0 2010-2011 116 $4,527,373 3 $68,513 2 $79,678 1 $17,461 2012-2015 106 $1,761,653 3 $30,247 2 $0 0 $0 Multi-Family Res Pre-1980 10939 $603,578,564 6993 $585,891,586 298 $13,673,202 796 $57,896,804 1981-1991 12441 $1,146,024,829 7123 $812,235,429 326 $42,062,881 965 $76,598,772 1992-1998 2891 $503,389,583 2481 $397,055,004 118 $18,043,907 368 $14,687,052 1999-2001 3551 $696,898,807 3054 $355,339,470 91 $26,330,445 417 $30,429,038 2002-2004 1390 $324,431,703 1086 $197,709,934 5 $342,724 2 $8,947,744 2005-2009 1829 $439,020,343 3841 $1,085,462,278 10 $774,743 243 $20,458,230 2010-2011 164 $88,946,542 121 $89,394,137 0 $0 0 $0 2012-2015 174 $74,761,404 95 $19,002,357 8 $0 0 $0 Agricultural Pre-1980 1981-1991 1992-1998 1999-2001 2002-2004 2005-2009 2010-2011 2012-2015 Commercial Pre-1980 3519 $403,007,279 4831 $990,824,519 391 $44,640,154 84 $31,026,855 1981-1991 1715 $833,400,445 1207 $1,482,176,297 110 $29,435,362 78 $75,519,838 1992-1998 531 $488,563,918 270 $395,614,598 42 $22,374,593 22 $31,719,216 1999-2001 441 $483,908,236 206 $391,077,196 16 $11,901,410 16 $31,500,423 2002-2004 497 $295,914,266 179 $123,352,893 21 $17,589,234 24 $7,459,372 2005-2009 1038 $641,428,240 328 $372,077,093 45 $20,673,278 60 $34,077,949 2010-2011 60 $48,689,455 51 $36,117,345 6 $1,661,885 1 $1,048,349 2012-2015 108 $29,729,131 72 $16,648,557 5 $1,588,537 8 $683,354 Industrial Pre-1980 1285 $367,595,397 1221 $279,492,026 131 $30,041,075 1 $291,659 1981-1991 1006 $536,820,648 403 $106,258,114 102 $81,481,293 9 $6,390,895 1992-1998 177 $119,702,729 64 $12,946,420 41 $49,372,020 2 $892,836 1999-2001 276 $246,761,164 69 $19,438,861 21 $25,521,123 2 $608,716 2002-2004 176 $79,950,745 33 $6,687,432 16 $8,254,465 5 $1,287,696 2005-2009 328 $282,679,900 76 $16,867,932 13 $7,848,531 0 $0 2010-2011 26 $8,157,044 12 $11,693,365 2 $299,484 0 $0 2012-2015 19 $2,372,910 5 $3,004,160 0 $0 0 $0 Critical Facilities Pre-1980 138 $183,998,697 217 $370,245,905 21 $18,596,451 9 $12,532,487 1981-1991 64 $35,092,118 16 $48,271,164 4 $21,944,113 3 $603,165 1992-1998 20 $188,157,568 7 $64,782,312 4 $7,018,400 0 $0 1999-2001 13 $77,689,655 7 $27,517,485 0 $0 0 $0 2002-2004 37 $99,387,175 5 $28,899,766 1 $358,093 2 $4,035,467 2005-2009 50 $215,860,595 7 $12,891,052 7 $1,543,124 0 $0 2010-2011 4 $18,021,954 2 $122,673 0 $0 0 $0 2012-2015 0 $0 6 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre-1980 1906 $538,016,548 1856 $926,943,507 234 $67,861,770 64 $34,371,846 1981-1991 791 $342,546,697 381 $707,632,506 55 $19,000,139 8 $11,000,723 1992-1998 232 $216,284,901 121 $287,897,283 12 $7,176,472 4 $3,534,060 1999-2001 166 $135,812,986 84 $406,471,249 9 $1,660,010 0 $0 2002-2004 202 $224,166,570 132 $205,363,032 10 $10,517,137 1 $415,794 2005-2009 205 $241,443,465 133 $148,672,078 20 $8,723,606 7 $1,670,103 2010-2011 41 $30,877,961 29 $24,426,076 0 $0 0 $0 2012-2015 46 $18,637,940 22 $41,091,963 1 $1,407,735 0 $0 2015 5

Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Wind and Flood Risks - (Hillsborough County - Unincorporated) s Totals 120 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 120 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy 130 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 130 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy 140 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 140 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - Wast of Bndy 150 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy SF Res Pre-1980 73494 71341 2153 20044 53450 27471 46023 47452 26042 10687 4965 9419 14319 18442 20673 63 282 1981-1991 48047 44918 3129 12809 35238 19604 28443 29094 18953 1981 1866 2955 5360 6305 7181 21 158 1992-1998 26479 23011 3468 7931 18548 10913 15566 16787 9692 1388 1027 1592 3222 4797 5827 13 78 1999-2001 16617 14471 2146 5242 11375 7059 9558 11719 4898 860 330 411 1071 2495 3722 10 22 2002-2004 21730 19624 2106 6739 14991 8481 13249 16472 5258 1582 768 1233 1794 2889 4046 26 30 2005-2009 28021 25867 2154 7472 20549 9383 18638 20037 7984 2501 2333 3733 4627 6549 7618 28 38 2010-2011 4545 4092 453 1071 3474 1346 3199 3128 1417 527 505 723 843 1271 1376 0 1 2012-2015 8103 7545 558 1928 6175 2309 5794 5731 2372 737 615 1043 1317 2002 2230 6 12 Mobile Home Pre-1980 9296 8672 624 4178 5118 4738 4558 7230 2066 1504 961 1602 1893 2334 2761 8 295 1981-1991 5908 5483 425 2766 3142 2959 2949 4460 1448 707 329 577 737 1004 1335 1 91 1992-1998 3040 2918 122 1626 1414 1759 1281 2556 484 307 114 204 273 342 434 4 42 1999-2001 1675 1617 58 961 714 1014 661 1456 219 189 45 93 127 168 278 0 26 2002-2004 1057 972 85 541 516 566 491 851 206 139 37 64 74 135 247 0 10 2005-2009 859 800 59 401 458 443 416 675 184 104 64 85 93 117 214 0 11 2010-2011 116 110 6 63 53 69 47 95 21 9 4 7 9 11 17 0 2 2012-2015 106 101 5 63 43 66 40 85 21 10 6 9 10 17 18 0 2 Multi-Family Res Pre-1980 10939 10008 931 894 10045 2855 8084 5662 5277 1822 1206 1313 1573 2170 2248 5 33 1981-1991 12441 11630 811 1529 10912 3874 8567 7073 5368 1556 1108 1301 1443 1532 1738 4 31 1992-1998 2891 2863 28 38 2853 297 2594 814 2077 208 43 57 72 80 81 0 14 1999-2001 3551 3408 143 41 3510 189 3362 1735 1816 300 357 361 429 464 1218 0 1 2002-2004 1390 1357 33 45 1345 112 1278 618 772 31 27 51 99 262 278 0 0 2005-2009 1829 1631 198 68 1761 187 1642 1065 764 306 246 273 311 619 719 0 0 2010-2011 164 164 0 7 157 38 126 92 72 33 14 21 35 53 62 0 1 2012-2015 174 142 32 16 158 49 125 70 104 21 16 16 41 41 41 0 15 Agricultural Pre-1980 1981-1991 1992-1998 1999-2001 2002-2004 2005-2009 2010-2011 2012-2015 Commercial Pre-1980 3519 3334 185 1266 2253 1573 1946 2660 859 796 407 653 772 892 1008 1 43 1981-1991 1715 1657 58 372 1343 666 1049 1184 531 275 114 230 289 324 372 0 16 1992-1998 531 523 8 139 392 266 265 403 128 58 17 29 43 54 77 1 3 1999-2001 441 428 13 66 375 151 290 272 169 47 14 26 46 55 80 0 1 2002-2004 497 473 24 125 372 245 252 354 143 53 22 34 43 55 74 0 1 2005-2009 1038 937 101 244 794 393 645 725 313 108 37 92 158 232 250 0 5 2010-2011 60 57 3 10 50 18 42 38 22 9 3 6 10 14 16 0 1 2012-2015 108 102 6 29 79 38 70 73 35 10 0 6 9 11 18 0 2 Industrial Pre-1980 1285 1265 20 182 1103 309 976 935 350 167 170 251 309 363 447 41 41 1981-1991 1006 945 61 107 899 347 659 631 375 122 100 175 267 354 471 1 49 1992-1998 177 170 7 19 158 80 97 128 49 12 4 13 22 39 58 0 4 1999-2001 276 250 26 36 240 70 206 164 112 10 14 37 51 79 102 0 4 2002-2004 176 173 3 12 164 37 139 145 31 18 26 32 38 46 60 0 0 2005-2009 328 294 34 29 299 83 245 242 86 45 33 75 86 116 157 1 7 2010-2011 26 15 11 0 26 2 24 13 13 2 5 18 18 19 20 0 1 2012-2015 19 14 5 3 16 5 14 12 7 2 2 6 8 8 9 0 1 Critical Facilities Pre-1980 138 138 0 7 131 54 84 102 36 11 19 19 31 82 85 18 43 1981-1991 64 64 0 17 47 31 33 35 29 0 15 15 16 16 18 1 1 1992-1998 20 16 4 8 12 9 11 12 8 1 0 1 1 2 6 0 0 1999-2001 13 13 0 9 4 9 4 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2002-2004 37 36 1 8 29 24 13 27 10 2 6 7 7 23 23 0 16 2005-2009 50 34 16 4 46 21 29 31 19 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 2 2010-2011 4 4 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012-2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre-1980 1906 1854 52 593 1313 825 1081 1449 457 293 103 258 357 409 442 6 38 1981-1991 791 779 12 241 550 336 455 639 152 50 36 54 69 90 94 6 11 1992-1998 232 227 5 77 155 120 112 155 77 11 9 16 19 23 29 2 6 1999-2001 166 155 11 53 113 87 79 129 37 15 6 33 41 51 58 0 29 2002-2004 202 187 15 63 139 96 106 158 44 6 21 24 34 51 51 2 3 2005-2009 205 195 10 51 154 76 129 138 67 19 19 30 35 45 51 0 12 2010-2011 41 41 0 19 22 22 19 35 6 5 0 5 7 11 11 0 0 2012-2015 46 42 4 12 34 14 32 36 10 9 1 3 7 12 13 0 3 Census Total Pop 826212 768923 57266 225493 600509 332571 493431 559480 266364 78642 35976 70325 111525 148786 178514 1455 704 Minority 360450 340183 20261 78034 282313 125178 235169 236918 123385 39205 14050 31969 54267 73852 88205 351 304 Over 65 99124 92631 6489 25416 73690 34318 64789 56452 42642 9083 4478 8382 13330 17154 20210 206 91 Disabled 53097 50173 2922 13308 39781 20422 32667 36983 16099 6857 2767 5115 8055 10577 12385 113 43 Poverty 96149 91079 5068 22525 73588 37770 58344 69164 26945 12409 3894 8364 13473 18143 21275 128 83 Lang. Isolated 38741 36985 1755 8546 30189 12079 26656 21930 16803 5988 1795 4211 6614 8957 10327 31 47 Single Parent 60084 56753 3330 14676 45396 22671 37401 41197 18869 6475 2525 5297 8590 11591 13804 75 49 150 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy Repetitive Loss Areas Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Category 1 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 2 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 3 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 4 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 5 Coastal Erosion Areas (VE zones) Riverine Erosion Areas 2015 6

Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Wind and Flood Risks - (City of Tampa) s Totals 120 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 120 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy 130 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 130 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy 140 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 140 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - Wast of Bndy 150 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy SF Res Pre-1980 63256 62879 377 0 63256 859 62397 34267 28989 34473 3432 10885 18043 25983 30836 195 0 1981-1991 6406 6248 158 921 5485 1427 4979 3674 2732 2595 418 1350 1989 2539 2853 36 0 1992-1998 4960 4916 44 2462 2498 2695 2265 3707 1253 1426 305 728 1028 1283 1417 30 1 1999-2001 3889 3833 56 1857 2032 1902 1987 2865 1024 1219 387 737 922 1126 1234 15 0 2002-2004 4893 4793 100 2276 2617 2338 2555 3360 1533 1568 244 817 1253 1655 1763 20 0 2005-2009 6581 6376 205 2634 3947 2701 3880 4160 2421 2533 408 999 1552 2141 2446 38 0 2010-2011 947 870 77 555 392 557 390 614 333 327 53 174 228 308 335 4 0 2012-2015 1767 1643 124 686 1081 687 1080 750 1017 891 200 477 747 962 1014 14 0 Mobile Home Pre-1980 918 906 12 0 918 3 915 481 437 459 388 406 418 467 589 1 0 1981-1991 55 55 0 1 54 2 53 41 14 25 16 19 19 21 23 0 0 1992-1998 24 24 0 3 21 4 20 18 6 8 7 7 8 9 9 0 2 1999-2001 32 31 1 2 30 2 30 23 9 20 15 16 18 18 20 0 0 2002-2004 26 26 0 0 26 0 26 10 16 17 17 21 22 22 22 1 0 2005-2009 18 18 0 0 18 0 18 10 8 10 9 9 10 10 11 0 0 2010-2011 3 3 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 2012-2015 3 3 0 0 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Multi-Family Res Pre-1980 6993 6946 47 0 6993 274 6719 3099 3894 4113 531 1627 2416 3363 3967 150 29 1981-1991 7123 6868 255 0 7123 576 6547 2852 4271 4224 643 2396 3595 4382 4839 236 53 1992-1998 2481 2469 12 949 1532 1314 1167 1769 712 953 521 909 941 1134 1156 18 0 1999-2001 3054 3054 0 1170 1884 1170 1884 1680 1374 1501 157 210 556 1017 1287 78 0 2002-2004 1086 1086 0 420 666 422 664 870 216 337 75 346 356 380 388 0 0 2005-2009 3841 3837 4 107 3734 113 3728 3108 733 2873 645 1700 2908 3384 3452 0 0 2010-2011 121 121 0 32 89 32 89 57 64 30 20 79 83 87 87 0 0 2012-2015 95 95 0 0 95 0 95 22 73 21 14 67 78 88 89 0 0 Agricultural Pre-1980 1981-1991 1992-1998 1999-2001 2002-2004 2005-2009 2010-2011 2012-2015 Commercial Pre-1980 4831 4803 28 0 4831 25 4806 2489 2342 2733 110 446 946 1733 2297 5 2 1981-1991 1207 1198 9 3 1204 32 1175 565 642 617 81 196 283 420 490 25 14 1992-1998 270 269 1 34 236 41 229 133 137 143 13 39 58 86 114 1 0 1999-2001 206 204 2 41 165 49 157 104 102 111 8 18 41 75 94 0 0 2002-2004 179 178 1 31 148 43 136 91 88 89 3 13 23 73 86 0 0 2005-2009 328 328 0 55 273 56 272 159 169 201 11 52 85 127 163 2 1 2010-2011 51 51 0 4 47 5 46 25 26 27 1 7 10 18 21 0 0 2012-2015 72 72 0 8 64 8 64 24 48 33 0 1 12 23 35 0 0 Industrial Pre-1980 1221 1164 57 0 1221 9 1212 778 443 576 184 338 443 549 646 31 4 1981-1991 403 396 7 3 400 7 396 240 163 181 90 115 151 174 190 7 43 1992-1998 64 60 4 0 64 0 64 45 19 33 21 22 25 33 42 0 1 1999-2001 69 68 1 9 60 10 59 48 21 47 6 9 12 20 33 0 0 2002-2004 33 30 3 0 33 0 33 12 21 20 2 4 10 12 13 0 0 2005-2009 76 75 1 7 69 7 69 40 36 37 1 5 26 28 30 0 0 2010-2011 12 12 0 0 12 0 12 9 3 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 2012-2015 5 5 0 0 5 0 5 3 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 Critical Facilities Pre-1980 217 217 0 7 210 7 210 147 70 142 114 118 119 130 149 0 0 1981-1991 16 16 0 0 16 5 11 14 2 4 2 2 2 2 3 0 1 1992-1998 7 7 0 1 6 4 3 7 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1999-2001 7 7 0 4 3 4 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2004 5 5 0 0 5 0 5 5 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 2005-2009 7 7 0 0 7 3 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2010-2011 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2012-2015 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 6 0 6 6 6 6 0 0 Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre-1980 1856 1837 19 0 1856 109 1747 1195 661 938 194 313 435 677 811 24 2 1981-1991 381 373 8 4 377 20 361 221 160 171 53 126 142 182 206 2 0 1992-1998 121 121 0 23 98 29 92 86 35 39 31 34 39 45 55 0 0 1999-2001 84 84 0 10 74 10 74 40 44 33 10 28 35 40 57 0 2 2002-2004 132 129 3 6 126 6 126 104 28 31 3 18 18 30 34 2 0 2005-2009 133 131 2 8 125 9 124 97 36 72 11 12 22 32 47 2 3 2010-2011 29 29 0 2 27 2 27 15 14 15 1 2 2 2 2 0 0 2012-2015 22 21 1 1 21 3 19 15 7 9 2 4 5 8 11 1 0 Census Total Pop 333035 327904 5131 36248 296781 55232 277800 193584 139444 148688 19140 50709 84427 116663 135110 4888 75 Minority 178605 176594 2011 16179 162422 26261 152342 121259 57342 59799 6054 16196 28368 39718 49734 1291 48 Over 65 36693 36306 387 2199 34493 3278 33414 17989 18703 18640 2260 6433 10553 14029 16535 723 4 Disabled 24780 24479 301 1693 23087 2985 21795 17006 7773 8906 835 2542 4687 6584 7967 162 6 Poverty 62942 62056 886 3545 59395 6695 56246 42192 20749 23211 1854 6167 11935 16272 20362 396 20 Lang. Isolated 16634 16494 140 685 15949 1103 15531 9697 6937 6966 700 1499 2285 3223 4381 109 2 Single Parent 29549 29156 393 2052 27497 3413 26136 19212 10336 10976 1124 3385 6097 8216 9872 242 7 150 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy Repetitive Loss Areas Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Category 1 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 2 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 3 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 4 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 5 Coastal Erosion Areas (VE zones) Riverine Erosion Areas 2015 7