Compact Primitive Semigroups Having (CEP)

Similar documents
International Mathematical Forum, 1, 2006, no. 32, F-rpp semigroups. Xiaojiang Guo

Primitive Ideals of Semigroup Graded Rings

Congruences on Inverse Semigroups using Kernel Normal System

Orthocryptic rpp Semigroups 1

Strongly Regular Congruences on E-inversive Semigroups

Prime Properties of the Smallest Ideal of β N

Regular OS-rpp semigroups

On a topological simple Warne extension of a semigroup

ON LALLEMENT S LEMMA 1

MAXIMAL ORDERS IN COMPLETELY 0-SIMPLE SEMIGROUPS

Unions of Dominant Chains of Pairwise Disjoint, Completely Isolated Subsemigroups

Topological groups with dense compactly generated subgroups

Domination in Cayley Digraphs of Right and Left Groups

Criteria for existence of semigroup homomorphisms and projective rank functions. George M. Bergman

Pseudo-finite monoids and semigroups

Stojan Bogdanović and Miroslav Ćirić

SEMIGROUP PRESENTATIONS FOR CONGRUENCES ON GROUPS

On the lattice of congruences on a fruitful semigroup

GOLOMB S ARITHMETICAL SEMIGROUP TOPOLOGY AND A SEMIPRIME SUFFICIENCY CONDITION FOR DIRICHLET S THEOREM

Strongly Nil -Clean Rings

FUZZY LIE IDEALS OVER A FUZZY FIELD. M. Akram. K.P. Shum. 1. Introduction

COMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS

Skew Group Rings and Galois Theory for Skew Fields 1

In this paper, we show that the bound given in Theorem A also holds for a class of abelian groups of rank 4.

Number Theory and Graph Theory. Prime numbers and congruences.

Weakly Semicommutative Rings and Strongly Regular Rings

ZERO DIVISORS FREE Γ SEMIRING

" on X is said to q converge to x in X, denoted by 9r x, if x 6 q( ). " such that A " and x.

CHARACTERIZATION OF IDEAL SEMIGROUPS OF INVERSE SEMIGROUPS. K.V.R.Srinivas

Research Article Frequent Oscillatory Behavior of Delay Partial Difference Equations with Positive and Negative Coefficients

Strongly nil -clean rings

SEMIGROUPS OF TRANSFORMATIONS WITH INVARIANT SET

Supersolubility of Finite Groups 1

Characterizing Ordered Bi-Ideals in Ordered Γ-Semigroups

A New Characterization of Boolean Rings with Identity

A Generalization of p-rings

THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter

Classes of Commutative Clean Rings

GENERALIZED GREEN S EQUIVALENCES ON THE SUBSEMIGROUPS OF THE BICYCLIC MONOID

On Harada Rings and Serial Artinian Rings

ON (m, n)-ideals OF AN ORDERED ABEL-GRASSMANN GROUPOID. Faisal Yousafzai, Asad Khan, and Aiyared Iampan

A NOTE ON PRIMITIVE SUBGROUPS OF FINITE SOLVABLE GROUPS

A GENERALIZATION OF BI IDEALS IN SEMIRINGS

On Extensions of Green s Relations in Semi groups

Order-theoretical Characterizations of Countably Approximating Posets 1

Simultaneous congruence representations: a special case

RINGS ISOMORPHIC TO THEIR NONTRIVIAL SUBRINGS

On Strongly Prime Semiring

arxiv: v3 [math.nt] 29 Mar 2016

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 25 May 2013

On quasi-frobenius semigroup algebras

Linear growth for semigroups which are disjoint unions of finitely many copies of the free monogenic semigroup

A four element semigroup that is inherently nonfinitely based?

SANDWICH SETS AND CONGRUENCES IN COMPLETELY INVERSE AG -GROUPOIDS

CATEGORICAL SEMIGROUPS

1 + 1 = 2: applications to direct products of semigroups

arxiv: v2 [math.gr] 17 Dec 2017

A CHARACTERIZATION OF LOCALLY FINITE VARIETIES THAT SATISFY A NONTRIVIAL CONGRUENCE IDENTITY

i=1 β i,i.e. = β 1 x β x β 1 1 xβ d

Distance labellings of Cayley graphs of semigroups

W P ZI rings and strong regularity

ON SPACES IN WHICH COMPACT-LIKE SETS ARE CLOSED, AND RELATED SPACES

Finiteness conditions and index in semigroup theory

The primitive root theorem

ON 2-ABSORBING PRIMARY AND WEAKLY 2-ABSORBING ELEMENTS IN MULTIPLICATIVE LATTICES

A Structure of KK-Algebras and its Properties

CHAPTEER - TWO SUBGROUPS. ( Z, + ) is subgroup of ( R, + ). 1) Find all subgroups of the group ( Z 8, + 8 ).

Regular Semigroups with Inverse Transversals

On the Complete Join of Permutative Combinatorial Rees-Sushkevich Varieties

Houston Journal of Mathematics. c 2008 University of Houston Volume 34, No. 4, 2008

Completely regular semigroups and (Completely) (E, H E )-abundant semigroups (a.k.a. U-superabundant semigroups): Similarities and Contrasts

Rings, Integral Domains, and Fields

Locally Compact Topologically Nil and Monocompact PI-rings

ON SOME GENERALIZED VALUATION MONOIDS

Transformation Semigroups:

Conjugacy in epigroups

GENERATING SINGULAR TRANSFORMATIONS

Smith theory. Andrew Putman. Abstract

Spectrally Bounded Operators on Simple C*-Algebras, II

Congruence Boolean Lifting Property

INVARIANT IDEALS OF ABELIAN GROUP ALGEBRAS UNDER THE MULTIPLICATIVE ACTION OF A FIELD, II

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 22 Jan 2019

= ϕ r cos θ. 0 cos ξ sin ξ and sin ξ cos ξ. sin ξ 0 cos ξ

The Influence of Minimal Subgroups on the Structure of Finite Groups 1

RINGS IN WHICH EVERY ZERO DIVISOR IS THE SUM OR DIFFERENCE OF A NILPOTENT ELEMENT AND AN IDEMPOTENT

Generalized Boolean and Boolean-Like Rings

THE GROUP OF UNITS OF SOME FINITE LOCAL RINGS I

Isogeny invariance of the BSD formula

ON REGULARITY OF RINGS 1

Prime k-bi-ideals in Γ-Semirings

On divisors of pseudovarieties generated by some classes of full transformation semigroups

On Extensions over Semigroups and Applications

Adequate and Ehresmann semigroups

Jónsson posets and unary Jónsson algebras

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ac] 11 Nov 2005

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

Homotopy and homology groups of the n-dimensional Hawaiian earring

Chapter 8. P-adic numbers. 8.1 Absolute values

3 Hausdorff and Connected Spaces

ON LATTICE-ORDERED REES MATRIX Γ-SEMIGROUPS

Transcription:

International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 2009, no. 19, 903-910 Compact Primitive Semigroups Having (CEP) Xiaojiang Guo 1 Department of Mathematics, Jiangxi Normal University Nanchang, Jiangxi 330022, P.R. China xjguo@jxnu.edu.cn, xjguo1967@sohu.com K.P. Shum 2 Department of Mathematics, The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China (SAR) kpshum@maths.hku.hk Xiang-Yun Xie Department of Mathematics and Physics, Wuyi University Jiangmen, Guangdong 529020, P.R. China xyxie@wyu.edu.cn Abstract Compact completely simple semigroups having congruence extension property (in brevity (CEP)) were first studied by Dumesnil in 1997. In this paper, we study the compact primitive semigroups having (CEP) and characterize such semigroups, so that the result of Dumesnil on compact completely simple semigroups having (CEP) is extended to compact primitive semigroups. Keywords and Phrases: Compact primitive semigroup; Congruence extension property; Regular element; Voltatic ideal AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 22A15; 20M10 1 The research of the first author is supported by the NSF of Jiangxi Province; the SF of Education Department of Jiangxi Province and the SF of Jiangxi Normal University. 2 The research of the second author is partially supported by a RGC (HK) grant (#2060297/05-07).

904 Xiaojiang Guo, K.P. Shum and Xiang-Yun Xie 1 Introduction A topological semigroup is a Hausdorff space S endowed with with a jointly continuous function acting on S as its semigroup multiplication. We call a topological semigroup S having the congruence extension property, in brevity (CEP ), if for each closed subsemigroup T of S and each closed congruence σ on T, σ has a closed extension to S. Obviously, if a compact semigroup S has (CEP) then each closed subsemigroup of S also has (CEP). The congruence extension property of a compact completely simple semigroup was first studied by Dumesnil [4]. She proved that S is a compact completely simple semigroup having (CEP) if and only if S is iseomorphic to a direct product semigroup I G Λ, where I is a left trivial semigroup, Λ is a right trivial semigroup and G is a compact group having (CEP). In this paper, we study the compact primitive semigroup having (CEP) and extend the above result of Dumesnil from compact completely simple semigroups to compact primitive semigroup having (CEP) with no non-trivial nilpotent elements. For notations and terminologies of semigroups and topological semigroups not given in this paper, the reader is referred to the texts of Howie, as well as Carruth,Hilderbrandt and Koch (see [9], [2] and [3]). 2 Preliminaries We first cite some definitions and results. Definition 2.1 (i) A semigroup S is said to be eventually regular [10] if for all x S, x n is regular for some positive integer n, where n depends on x. The smallest integer n(x) for x n(x) to be regular is called the regular index of x, denoted by r(x). (ii) A semigroup S is said to be a D-semigroup if S contains exactly one regular D-class. (iii) A semigroup S is called a GV-semigroup [1] if S is an eventually regular semigroup and every regular element of S is H-related to an idempotent of S. (iv) An idempotent e of a semigroup S is said to be primitive if for all f E(S), f e implies f = e or f = 0 when S has a zero. Naturally, we call a semigroup S primitive if every idempotent of S is primitive. Notation 2.2 If x r(x) is contained in a subgroup H of a semigroup S, then we denote the identity of such largest subgroup in S by x.

Compact primitive semigroups having (CEP) 905 Definition 2.3 If I is an ideal of a semigroup S, then we call I a voltaic ideal of S provided the following conditions are satisfied: (a) for all a, b S, either ab I or a 2 = b 2 = ab; (b) if for a, b S, ab and ba are both not contained in I, then for all z I, az I bz I and za I zb I; (c) for all a, b S, if ab I, then a ab = ab = abb. Lemma 2.4 [7] If S is a compact semigroup S having (CEP), then S is a semilattice of compact D-semigroups having (CEP). Lemma 2.5 [8] Let S be a compact semigroup whose set of all regular elements RegS forms an ideal. Then S has (CEP) if and only if RegS is a compact orthogroup having (CEP) such that S is a nil extension of RegS which is a voltaic ideal of S. We now consider the congruence on the 0-direct union of completely 0- simple semigroups. For the 0-direct union of semigroups, the reader can be referred to [9, p.71]. Lemma 2.6 Let S be the 0-direct union of completely 0-simple semigroups S α for α Y. Then an equivalent relation ρ on S becomes a congruence on S if and only if there exist a subset A of Y, the universal relation A of the 0- direct union of completely 0-simple semigroups S α with α Y \A and a proper congruence ρ β on the completely 0-simple semigroup S β for all β A, such that ρ = ( α A ρ α) A. Proof : By routine checking, we can easily show that the converse part of the lemma holds. On the other hand, if ρ is a congruence on S, then the restriction ρ α = ρ Sα of ρ on S α is obvious a congruence on S α for all α Y. Observe that the congruence class containing the zero element of S α is an ideal of S α, so either the ρ α -class of S α containing 0 is the {0} or ρ α = Sα is the universal relation on S α (see, [9, p.73]). In the former case, ρ α is proper. And, we denote the set {α Y : ρ α is proper} by A. Because the congruence on S is compatible with multiplication, we can deduce that for every x S α \{0} and y S β \{0} with α β, xρy implies xρye = 0, where e L x E(Sα ) and hence yρ0. This shows that the ρ α -class of S α containing 0 and the ρ β -class of S β containing 0 are the nonzero ideals of S α and S β, respectively. Note that on a completely 0-simple semigroup, the congruence class containing 0 is {0}. Accordingly, ρ α = Sα and ρ β = Sβ if α β and there exist x S α and y S β such that xρy. Thus ρ = ( α A ρ α) A.

906 Xiaojiang Guo, K.P. Shum and Xiang-Yun Xie 3 Main result Let us first extend [4, Theorem 1] to compact completely 0-simple semigroups having (CEP). Lemma 3.1 Let S be a compact completely 0-simple semigroup. Then S has (CEP) if and only if S is a rectangular group I G Λ adjoining a zero element, where I is a left trivial semigroup, Λ is a right trivial semigroup and G is a compact group having (CEP). Proof : ) Suppose that S has (CEP). Then, by Lemma 2.4, S is a semilattice Y of compact D-semigroups S β having (CEP) with β Y. Notice that S has exactly two D-classes, namely, D and {0}. Hence, S = D 0 and S αβ = D, for some β Y. By Lemma 2.4, this shows that D is a completely simple semigroup. Now, by [4, Theorem 1], we can immediately see that D is iseomorphic to a compact rectangular group I G Λ in which the group G is of (CEP). This proves the necessary part of the lemma. ) Assume that S satisfies the condition in the lemma. Then S\{0} is a completely simple semigroup having (CEP). Let T be a closed completely simple subsemigroup of S and ρ be a closed congruence on T. We now consider the following two cases: (1) T contains no zero element 0. In this case, T S\{0}. Hence there exists a closed congruence σ on S\{0} such that σ (T T ) = ρ. Now, by Lemma 2.6, σ S extends ρ from T to S. (2) T contains a zero element 0. Since S\{0} is a rectangular group, T \{0} = T (S\{0}) is a closed completely simple subsemigroup of S\{0}. By Lemma 2.5, either ρ = T or there exists a closed congruence ρ on S\{0} such that ρ = ρ T. If ρ = T, then S extends ρ from T to S. If ρ = ρ T, then, because S\{0} has (CEP), there exists a closed congruence σ on T \{0} which extends ρ on S\{0}. By applying Lemma 2.6 again, σ = σ S is a closed congruence on S and we can easily see that σ indeed extends ρ from T to S. Thus, ρ can be extended from T to S, and consequently S has (CEP). We now consider the compact primitive semigroups having (CEP).

Compact primitive semigroups having (CEP) 907 Lemma 3.2 Let S be a compact semigroup which is a primitive regular semigroup. If S is the 0-direct union of completely 0-simple semigroups S α with α Y, then S has (CEP) if and only if every S α is iseomorphic to a rectangular group I α G α Λ α adjoined with 0 in which each G α is a compact group having (CEP). Proof : ) Suppose that S has (CEP). Because S α is a principal ideal of S, S α is a closed ideal of S and each S α clearly has (CEP). By Lemma 3.1, S α is iseomorphic to a rectangular group I α G α Λ α adjoined with 0, where G α is a compact group having (CEP). ) Assume that S satisfies the conditions of the theorem. Then, by [4, Theorem 1], every S α has (CEP). Now let T be a closed subsemigroup of S and ρ a closed congruence on T. Then, T is obviously the 0-direct union of compact semigroups T α = T S α, with α Y. Note that each H-class of a compact semigroup is closed, we observe that each S α is a union of some closed subgroups and T α is hence a union of closed cancellative semigroups. Recall that any compact cancellative semigroup is a compact group (see [2]), we observe that each T α is either a completely 0-simple semigroup or a completely simple semigroup, and hence T is the 0-direct union of completely 0-simple semigroups T α, with α Y. Denote by X the set {α Y : T α }. Then, by Lemma 2.6, there exist a subset A of X, the universal relation A on the 0-direct union of T α for α X\A and a proper congruence ρ β on T β, for all β A such that ρ = ( α A ρ α) A. Because each S α has (CEP), there exists a closed congruence σ α on S α such that σ α (Tα T α ) = ρ α, for all α A. But since ρ α is proper for α A, σ α is clearly proper for α A. Again by Lemma 2.6, σ = ( α A σ α) ( α,β X\A S α S β ) ( α Y \X S α ), where Sα is the identity relation on S α. Thus, σ is a congruence on S with σ (T T ) = ρ. It remains to verify that σ is a closed congruence on S. By [9, Theorem 3.5], the usual Green s relation J is a congruence on S such that each S α is one of the J -class. Since S is itself a compact semigroup, J is of course a closed relation on S (see [2]). This implies that the mapping φ : S S/J induced by J is continuous. Accordingly, φ is a closed mapping because S is a compact space and S/J is a Hausdorff space. Hence, the mapping ψ : S S S/J S/J ; (x, y) (xφ, yφ) is a closed and continuous mapping. Thus (ρ)ψ is a closed relation on S/J and hence, τ = ( α A S α S α ) ( α,β X\A S α S β ) = (ρ)ψψ 1 is a closed subset of S S. Clearly, every (S α S α )\σ α is open, and we immediately see that α A [(S α S α )\σ α ] is also open. Thus (S S)\σ = (( α A (S α S α )\σ α ((S S)\τ) ((S S)\ S ) is open and consequently, σ is a closed

908 Xiaojiang Guo, K.P. Shum and Xiang-Yun Xie congruence on S. This shows that the congruence σ is an extension of ρ to S. In other words, S has (CEP ). Notation 3.3 Denote the set {β Y : β α} by ω(α), where Y is a semilattice. We now formulate the following lemma for nil extension of rectangular groups. Lemma 3.4 Let N α be a nil extension of rectangular group S α = I α G α Λ α. If S = α Y N α is a primitive semigroup, then ω(α) 2, for all α Y. Proof : Suppose, on the contrary, that ω(α) 3 for some α Y. Let β, γ ω(α). Then γβ < β < α and so we can let γ < β < α. We first claim that RegS α RegSβ RegSγ is a regular subsemigroup of S. To prove our claim, we let e E(S α ) and f E(S β ). Then ef S β. Since RegS β is an ideal of S β and by ef = ef f and ef RegS β, we consequently obtain that RegS α RegS β RegS β. Similarly, we can also obtain that RegS β RegS α RegS β, RegS α RegS γ RegS γ, RegS γ RegS α RegS γ, RegS β RegS γ RegS γ and RegS γ RegS β RegS γ. Hence, we have verified that RegS α RegSβ RegSγ is a regular subsemigroup of S and our claim is thus established. It is now clear that the principal factors of the regular semigroup RegS α RegSβ RegSγ are RegSα, 0 RegSβ 0 and RegS0 γ. It has been known that a semigroup S is an orthodox semigroup if and only if its principal factors are orthodox (see, [9, Ex.2, p.109]). Thus the semigroup RegS α RegSβ RegSγ is an orthodox semigroup. Now, it is easy to deduce that (gfg)e(gfg) < gfg < g, for e E(S α ), f E(S β ) and g E(S γ ). However, this contradicts our hypothesis that g is a primitive idempotent of S. Hence, ω(α) 2 and our proof is now completed. Finally, we proceed to characterize the compact primitive semigroups with no non-trivial nilpotent elements. The following is the main theorem of this paper. Theorem 3.5 (Main Theorem) Let S be a compact primitive semigroup with zero. If S contains no non-trivial nilpotent elements, then S has (CEP) if and only if RegS is a voltaic ideal of S such that S is a nil extension of RegS and RegS can be expressible as the 0-direct union of rectangular groups RG α = I α G α Λ α adjoined with a zero element, where G α is a compact group having (CEP ), for every α.

Compact primitive semigroups having (CEP) 909 Proof : Let S be a compact primitive semigroup having (CEP ). Then, by the above lemma and [5, Theorem 2.1], S is a semilattice Y of compact D- semigroups S α, for α Y. Obviously, each S α has (CEP ). By using a result of X. J. Guo in [7], S α is a nil-extension of a compact rectangular group I α G α Λ α and G α has (CEP ). Now let 0 S τ. Then S τ = {0} because S contains no non-trivial nilpotent elements. On the other hand, by Lemma 3.4, ω(x) 2 for all x Y and hence, S α S β = {0} if α β. This shows that RegS is the 0-direct union of RegSα 0 for α (Y \{τ}) and RegS is an ideal of S. The rest of the proof follows from Lemma 2.5. Conversely, suppose that S satisfies the conditions of the theorem. Then, by Lemmas 2.5 and 3.4, it suffices to verify that RegS is an ideal of S. In order to prove that S is an eventually-regular semigroup, we suppose, on the contrary, that x n is not a regular element for all positive integer n. Then, since the ideal RegS is a voltaic ideal of S, x 3 = x x 2 = x 2 (by Definition 2.4 (a)) and so we can deduce that x 2 x 2 x 2 = x 4 = x 3 = x 2, that is, x 2 is regular. This is clearly a contradiction. Thus, S is an eventuallyregular semigroup. Now, by our hypothesis, S is the so called GV -semigroup and furthermore, by the results of Bogdanović [1,p 118-130], S is a semilattice Y of D-semigroups S α which is a nil-extension of RegS α, for α Y. Since RegS is the 0-direct union of rectangular groups RG β adjoining zero, RegS α can be expressed by some rectangular groups RG β. By using the same arguments, we can also show that RG α RG β = {0} if α β, and thereby RegS α RegS β = {0} if α β. This shows that S α S β S 0 if α β, where S 0 denotes the semigroup S α containing 0. Since S contains no non-trivial nilpotent elements, S 0 = {0} and S α S β = {0} if α β. Thus RegS is indeed an ideal of S, as required. This completes the proof. From Theorem 3.5 and the fact that a semigroup without zero always contains no non-trivial nilpotent elements, we deduce the following corollary. Corollary 3.6 A compact primitive semigroup S without zero has (CEP ) if and only if RegS is a compact rectangular group having (CEP ) such that S is a nil extension of RegS and RegS is a voltaic ideal of S. References [1] S. Bogdanović, Semigroups with a system of subsemigroups, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, 1985.

910 Xiaojiang Guo, K.P. Shum and Xiang-Yun Xie [2] J. H. Carruth, J. A. Hildebrant and R. J. Koch, The theory of topological semigroups, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1983. [3] J. H. Carruth, J. A. Hildebrant and R. J. Koch, The theory of topological semigroups Vol. 2, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1986. [4] J. Dumesnil, The congruence extension property for compact completely simple semigroups, Semigroup Forum 55(1997), no. 3, 396-398. [5] X. J. Guo, The congruence extension property in compact semigroups having precisely one regular D-class. Semigroup Forum 64(2002), no. 1, 90-100. [6] X. J. Guo, The ideal extension property in compact semigroups, Semigroup Forum 66(2003), no. 3, 368-380. [7] X. J. Guo, The ideal extension and congruence extension properties for compact semigroups, Semigroup Forum 69(2004), no. 1, 102 112. [8] X. J. Guo, K. P. Shum and X. Y. Xie, Ω-compact semigroups having congruence extension property, Topology and its Applications 154(2007), no. 8, 1834-1840. [9] J. M. Howie, An introduction to semigroup theory, Academic Press, London, 1976. [10] Z. J. Tian and Z. Xu, Properties of eventually inverse semigroups, Southeast Asian Bull. Math. 30(2006), no. 3, 561 571. Received: September, 2009