Study Overview. the nassau hub study. The Nassau Hub

Similar documents
VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

Alternatives Analysis

Alternatives Analysis Report

East Bay BRT. Planning for Bus Rapid Transit

Regional Transit Development Plan Strategic Corridors Analysis. Employment Access and Commuting Patterns Analysis. (Draft)

HORIZON 2030: Land Use & Transportation November 2005

Foreword. Vision and Strategy

Economic Geography of the Long Island Region

Local Area Key Issues Paper No. 13: Southern Hinterland townships growth opportunities

HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

(fc) BPC Policy No , IIM7fyilK Office of the District Clerk TRANSITION ZONE POLICY

Regional Snapshot Series: Transportation and Transit. Commuting and Places of Work in the Fraser Valley Regional District

The 3V Approach. Transforming the Urban Space through Transit Oriented Development. Gerald Ollivier Transport Cluster Leader World Bank Hub Singapore

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Committee Meeting November 6, 2018

River North Multi-Modal Transit Analysis

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

Managing Growth: Integrating Land Use & Transportation Planning

Mapping Accessibility Over Time

6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

1600 Prairie Drive , FAX

Frequently Asked Questions

Joint Planning Advisory Council July 19, 2011

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Technical Team August 23, 2007

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

CLAREMONT MASTER PLAN 2017: LAND USE COMMUNITY INPUT

Initial Findings from Regional Initiatives Planning Enhancement Fair Housing & Equity Assessment

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Impressive Growth & Relaxed Elegance.

City and SUMP of Ravenna

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

ONE REGION: PLANNING FOR A STRONG AND JUST METROPOLIS. NYLON # 14: Regional Planning. October 31, 2018

State initiative following up the 2006 national planning report

Date: March 31, 2014 PATE; fyril 2.3,2 >H

Forecasts from the Strategy Planning Model

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

The National Spatial Strategy

National Planning Framework Louth County Council Submission

MPOs SB 375 LAFCOs SCAG Practices/Experiences And Future Collaborations with LAFCOs

Prepared for: San Diego Association Of Governments 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101

Crow River Plaza - Retail Development South Diamond Lake Rd. Rogers, MN FOR LEASE 1,024 SF Retail Space. Lease Rate: $16.

Growth Management: Analysis of Comments Received and Responses Comments received as of October 16, 2017

Subject: Note on spatial issues in Urban South Africa From: Alain Bertaud Date: Oct 7, A. Spatial issues

2040 MTP and CTP Socioeconomic Data

The Governance of Land Use

Crow River Plaza - Retail Development South Diamond Lake Rd. Rogers, MN FOR LEASE 2,066 SF Retail Space. Lease Rate: $16.

Date: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, Consideration of the City of Vancouver s Regional Context Statement

Economic and Social Urban Indicators: A Spatial Decision Support System for Chicago Area Transportation Planning

CHAPTER 2. Strategic Context

The CRP stresses a number of factors that point to both our changing demographics and our future opportunities with recommendations for:

APPENDIX V VALLEYWIDE REPORT

Monmouth County Adam Nassr (Partner: Brian Berkowitz, Ocean County)

Transport Planning in Large Scale Housing Developments. David Knight

The Greater Drogheda Area - Drogheda (Co. Louth), Drogheda South (Co. Meath) & the Meath Coast

Accessibility as an Instrument in Planning Practice. Derek Halden DHC 2 Dean Path, Edinburgh EH4 3BA

FINAL - April 20, 2018 TRACK WORK PROGRAM. PENN STATION SUMMER 2018 AMTRAK S.O.G.R. Effective: May 21 - July 20, 2018

Data Collection. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1

Updating the Urban Boundary and Functional Classification of New Jersey Roadways using 2010 Census data

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary

CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF COURTENAY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA

BROOKINGS May

ADDRESSING TITLE VI AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANS

Typical information required from the data collection can be grouped into four categories, enumerated as below.

Regional Performance Measures

Economic Activity Economic A ctivity

Regional Performance Measures

Beginning to Enjoy the Outside View A Glance at Transit Forecasting Uncertainty & Accuracy Using the Transit Forecasting Accuracy Database

APPENDIX I - AREA PLANS

Introduction and Project Overview

Metrolinx Transit Accessibility/Connectivity Toolkit

The Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) by Local Governments. Giving municipal decision-makers the power to make better decisions

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE Growth & Intensification Study Secondary Plan Stakeholder Session June 26th, 2017

Regional Growth Strategy Work Session Growth Management Policy Board

Changes in Land Use, Socioeconomic Indices, and the Transportation System in Gifu City and their Relevance during the Late 20th Century

FHWA GIS Outreach Activities. Loveland, Colorado April 17, 2012

The effects of impact fees on urban form and congestion in Florida

Port Cities Conference: How Regional Planning can Help Support a Competitive Port. Christina DeMarco Metro Vancouver

3. THE TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

Dunn County Snow Removal Policy

Regional Growth Strategy Regional TOD Advisory Committee

2014 Certification Review Regional Data & Modeling

NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES. Fair Housing & Equity Assessment & Regional Planning Enhancement

Section 2. Indiana Geographic Information Council: Strategic Plan

Brentwood General Plan Update

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

Urban Expansion of the City Kolkata since last 25 years using Remote Sensing

Application #: TEXT

Chelmsford Local Plan

Westside Extension Los Angeles, California

Appendix B. Durham Region Travel Demand Model Calibration

Transcription:

Livable Communities through Sustainable Transportation the nassau hub study AlternativeS analysis / environmental impact statement The Nassau Hub Study Overview Nassau County has initiated the preparation of an Alternatives Analysis (AA) to address transportation problems in the area known as Nassau Hub. The Nassau Hub Study will define new transportation options and identify land use strategies that will help promote economic development, create jobs in the Study Area, and improve access and mobility, which in turn, will enhance the quality of life for all Nassau County residents. The AA will examine opportunities for introducing realistic and practical transit improvements within the Hub study area, and will be conducted in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and in accordance with FTA requirements. The purpose of the AA, as currently defined, is to select a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA). Following the selection of the LPA and with the FTA s concurrence, Nassau County will conduct an environmental review in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The review will result in a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for public review and comment. Nassau County anticipates a Final Environmental Impact Statement, a Record of Decision and, if successful, federal funding to implement the LPA. Transit projects seeking funding from the FTA New Starts or Small Starts program must follow a standard process (see AA/EIS Process Flow Chart). New/Small Starts is the Federal funding program for new transit initiatives and Nassau County must follow a prescribed process to be eligible to receive these funds. An important early step in this standardized planning process is the preparation of an Alternatives Analysis (AA) that documents existing and future transportation problems, evaluates a range of potential alternatives to address those problems, and selects an LPA. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is then prepared to fully disclose the potential impacts of the LPA on the human and natural environment. During both the AA and EIS processes, the public and other stakeholders are given frequent opportunities to review the analyses and provide comments and other input.

AA/EIS Process Flow Chart Corridor Planning/ Feasibility Study Alternatives Analysis Select Locally Preferred Alternative Prepare EIS Background In 2003, the Nassau County Planning Department began efforts to position the County to be eligible for Federal grants related to improving, upgrading and extending the transit network within the County, specifically the Study Area. The results were documented in the 2006 Nassau Hub Major Investment Study Final Report (the MIS) that examined and analyzed the demographic, economic and transportation issues within an area known as the Nassau Hub. The MIS concluded that the County should further study potential transit and related land use improvements, within the context of the FTA s project development process. Previous Studies Over the years there have been multiple efforts initiated to study the transportation, land use and economic issues within the Study Area. These studies include: Nassau County Planning Commission s 1968 Transit System Study; The 1996 Nassau Hub Economic Development Study; The 1998 Nassau Hub Study; and, Nassau County s Nassau Hub Major Investment Study Final Report, dated March 2006. Additional pertinent studies that have examined Nassau County and/or Long Island as a whole include: The 2008 Nassau County Master Plan Update, Trends Analysis, adopted April 3, 2009; New York Metropolitan Transportation Council s (NYMTC) 2010-2035 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); The Long Island Regional Planning Council s Long Island 2035, dated December 2009; and, The Regional Plan Association s Places to Grow, an Analysis of the Potential for Transit-Accessible Housing and Jobs in Long Island s Downtowns and Station Areas, dated January 2010. These studies identified problems of growing roadway congestion, a limited transit system, slowed population growth and an overall stagnation of economic growth. Additionally, these studies identified strategies for directing growth to existing downtowns and targeted development areas, including the Study Area, as well as encouraging the use of public transit as a means of supporting growth without further exacerbating traffic congestion. The MIS was the only one of the above studies conducted pursuant to FTA requirements.

Faced with stagnant economic growth, an ever-increasing property tax burden and traffic congestion that continues to worsen, the County determined that a new paradigm was necessary for the future sustainable growth of the County. Accordingly, the County commissioned The Nassau Hub MIS in 2003 to review new transportation options and supportive land use development strategies that would result in improved access and mobility, support economic development opportunities, and enhance and preserve the high quality of suburban life that residents had come to expect. The MIS laid the groundwork and established the starting point for this current AA. The MIS identified problems and needs in the Nassau Hub, including: High levels of roadway congestion; Incomplete and/or missing transportation linkages between the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) stations within the Nassau Hub and major activity centers; Missing transportation linkages among various activity centers within the Nassau Hub; Lack of north-south transit connectivity; Disjointed and automobile-oriented land use patterns; Unrealized economic development potential; and, An over-reliance upon automobiles for traveling to, from and within the Nassau Hub. After significant technical analysis and public outreach, the MIS concluded that a potential series of transit projects should be advanced into the FTA New Starts/Small Starts process beginning with the completion of an AA, the selection of an LPA, and the completion of a NEPA EIS. This Problem Statement is one of the initial work elements in this process. The Nassau Hub Study Area Primary Study Area The Nassau Hub Primary Study Area (Study Area) occupies an approximate 11.7 square-mile area in the heart of Nassau County, and is home to Hofstra University (existing campus and planned medical school), Nassau Community College, Museum Row, the Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum, the County Government Center, Nassau University Medical Center, Mitchel Field / Eisenhower Park, Roosevelt Field, and other notable County features. Additionally, thousands of residents, employees, students and others live and work within the area. This crucial economic center, so vital to the future of Nassau County, has substantial traffic congestion, lacks efficient and direct transit choices and includes large areas of disjointed land use patterns. These factors have contributed to long commutes, decreased environmental quality, and overall difficulty in traveling to, from and within the area. The Primary Study Area is the focus of this Study and is where it is anticipated that the majority of physical improvements associated with any given alternative may occur. During the MIS, a Study Area boundary was established based on the nexus of major roadways, transit stations and infrastructure, major land-use features and institutions and principal trip origins and/or destinations that might benefit from transit and mobility improvements. The MIS Study Area northern boundary was located just to the north of the LIRR s Port Jefferson Branch, while

the southern boundary was just to the south of Hempstead Turnpike. The western boundary ran along Rockaway Avenue and Cathedral Avenue, and the eastern boundary was Eisenhower Park. It included all or parts of the Villages of Mineola, Westbury, Garden City and Hempstead; the Hamlets of Carle Place and Uniondale; and the U.S. Census defined area of East Garden City. This area also included the LIRR stations at Mineola, Carle Place, Westbury, Garden City, Country Life Press, and Hempstead; the Mineola Intermodal Center; the Rosa Parks Hempstead Transit Center; and the Roosevelt Field Bus Transfer Facility. Finally, major roadways within these boundaries that serve both regional and local destinations include: the Meadowbrook State Parkway, Franklin Avenue, Clinton Road, Merrick Avenue, Hempstead Turnpike, Old Country Road, and Stewart Avenue. The MIS Study Area boundary has been adopted as the starting point for this AA with one modification. The eastern boundary has been extended to incorporate the Nassau University Medical Center s East Meadow campus that is immediately east of Eisenhower Park. It was determined that the Medical Center is integral to any consideration of improved transit because it is a: major provider of public healthcare major employer with existing transit-dependent users and visitors; destination with significant near-term expansion plans; and, key location on Hempstead Turnpike and adjacent to the existing MIS Study Area boundary. The Study Area boundary is not necessarily a hard and fast line. Rather, as the Study progresses with technical analyses and outreach to the public, stakeholders and government agencies, the boundaries may contract or expand if dictated by Study needs. Regional Context for Study Areas

Primary Study Area Preliminary Regional Study Area A Preliminary Regional Study Area (Regional Study Area) has also been defined based on travel patterns, potential opportunities for connections among activity centers, and key economic development opportunities outside the Primary Study Area. Building on the conclusions of the MIS, coupled with a need to incorporate areas that have the greatest potential for economic development, boundaries have been established. These boundaries extend slightly north of Mineola along Jericho Turnpike, on the east to the Hamlet of Bethpage along the Seaford Oyster Bay Expressway, on the south along Sunrise Highway, and to the west along Nassau Boulevard. This expanded area includes portions of the West Hempstead, Babylon and Ronkonkoma Branches of the LIRR; major roadways such as the Northern and Southern State Parkways, the Wantagh State Parkway, Routes 106/107, the Seaford Oyster Bay Expressway, Sunrise Highway and Jericho Turnpike; as well as major town centers such as the Hamlet of Hicksville and the Village of Freeport; and the former Grumman site in Bethpage (currently undergoing redevelopment). The Regional Study Area was established to capture the context of the larger travel market to the Study Area. As noted above for the Study Area, the boundary of the Regional Study Area may be modified if warranted by findings of the Study s technical analyses and/or input from the outreach process.

Preliminary Regional Study Area