Puiseux series dynamics and leading monomials of escape regions

Similar documents
The Geometry of Cubic Maps

CUBIC POLYNOMIAL MAPS WITH PERIODIC CRITICAL ORBIT, PART II: ESCAPE REGIONS

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 9 Oct 2009

Totally Marked Rational Maps. John Milnor. Stony Brook University. ICERM, April 20, 2012 [ ANNOTATED VERSION]

THE GEOMETRY OF THE CRITICALLY-PERIODIC CURVES IN THE SPACE OF CUBIC POLYNOMIALS

THE GEOMETRY OF THE CRITICALLY-PERIODIC CURVES IN THE SPACE OF CUBIC POLYNOMIALS

CUBIC POLYNOMIAL MAPS WITH PERIODIC CRITICAL ORBIT, PART II: ESCAPE REGIONS

Wandering Domains in Spherically Complete Fields

Distribution of PCF cubic polynomials

The Mandelbrot Set. Andrew Brown. April 14, 2008

Antipode Preserving Cubic Maps: the Fjord Theorem

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

(dim Z j dim Z j 1 ) 1 j i

Cubic Polynomial Maps with Periodic Critical Orbit, Part I

In this paper we consider complex analytic rational maps of the form. F λ (z) = z 2 + c + λ z 2

Hyperbolic Component Boundaries

14. Rational maps It is often the case that we are given a variety X and a morphism defined on an open subset U of X. As open sets in the Zariski

POLYNOMIAL BASINS OF INFINITY

FIXED POINTS OF RENORMALIZATION.

Chapter 19 Clifford and the Number of Holes

Return times of polynomials as meta-fibonacci numbers

HAUSDORFFIZATION AND POLYNOMIAL TWISTS. Laura DeMarco. Kevin Pilgrim

arxiv: v2 [math.ds] 13 Sep 2017

NOTES FOR DRAGOS: MATH 210 CLASS 12, THURS. FEB. 22

MATH 547 ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4

CUBIC POLYNOMIALS: A MEASURABLE VIEW OF PARAMETER SPACE

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday 10 February 2004 (Day 1)

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES

1 The Local-to-Global Lemma

FAMILIES OF ALGEBRAIC CURVES AS SURFACE BUNDLES OF RIEMANN SURFACES

Handlebody Decomposition of a Manifold

Resolution of Singularities in Algebraic Varieties

NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN

MODULI SPACES OF CURVES

ON KÖNIG S ROOT-FINDING ALGORITHMS.

The eventual hyperbolic dimension of entire functions

Evolution of the McMullen Domain for Singularly Perturbed Rational Maps

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 13 Oct 2017

INVISIBLE TRICORNS IN REAL SLICES OF RATIONAL MAPS

Polynomials, Ideals, and Gröbner Bases

PROBLEMS FOR VIASM MINICOURSE: GEOMETRY OF MODULI SPACES LAST UPDATED: DEC 25, 2013

Definition We say that a topological manifold X is C p if there is an atlas such that the transition functions are C p.

(1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections

MCMULLEN S ROOT-FINDING ALGORITHM FOR CUBIC POLYNOMIALS

Julia s two faces. The dichotomy theorem on Julia sets of quadratic polynomials. Rasila Hoek July 1, Bachelor thesis Supervisor: dr.

AUTOMORPHISMS OF X(11) OVER CHARACTERISTIC 3, AND THE MATHIEU GROUP M 11

Singular Perturbations in the McMullen Domain

Solutions to Unique Readability Homework Set 30 August 2011

Combinatorial equivalence of topological polynomials and group theory

Math 730 Homework 6. Austin Mohr. October 14, 2009

Algebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014

Part II. Riemann Surfaces. Year

BOUNDEDNESS OF HYPERBOLIC COMPONENTS OF NEWTON MAPS

Math 145. Codimension

THE MODULI SPACE OF QUADRATIC RATIONAL MAPS

Checkerboard Julia Sets for Rational Maps

Odds and ends on equivariant cohomology and traces

Connectedness loci of complex polynomials: beyond the Mandelbrot set

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 41

Qualifying Exams I, 2014 Spring

Lecture 7: Etale Fundamental Group - Examples

Let X be a topological space. We want it to look locally like C. So we make the following definition.

Weight functions on non-archimedean analytic spaces and the Kontsevich Soibelman skeleton

BASIC MATRIX PERTURBATION THEORY

b 0 + b 1 z b d z d

This is a preprint of: On a Family of Rational Perturbations of the Doubling Map, Jordi Canela, Nuria Fagella, Antoni Garijo, J. Difference Equ.

1 Structures 2. 2 Framework of Riemann surfaces Basic configuration Holomorphic functions... 3

ATTRACTING DYNAMICS OF EXPONENTIAL MAPS

Weak Néron Models for Lattès Maps

The set of points at which a polynomial map is not proper

10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

Dynamics on Hubbard trees

1 Rings 1 RINGS 1. Theorem 1.1 (Substitution Principle). Let ϕ : R R be a ring homomorphism

THE STRUCTURE OF THE MODULI STACK OF ELLIPTIC CURVES

3 Fatou and Julia sets

Galois Theory, summary

BIFURCATION MEASURES AND QUADRATIC RATIONAL MAPS

Representations and Linear Actions

Chapter 8. P-adic numbers. 8.1 Absolute values

INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY

COMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ds] 15 Jun 1996

Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations

Institutionen för matematik, KTH.

Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes

APPROXIMABILITY OF DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS BETWEEN TREES OF SPHERES

The Berkovich Ramification Locus: Structure and Applications

REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS

Riemann Surfaces and Algebraic Curves

Math 213br HW 3 solutions

Real Analysis Prelim Questions Day 1 August 27, 2013

LECTURE 2. defined recursively by x i+1 := f λ (x i ) with starting point x 0 = 1/2. If we plot the set of accumulation points of P λ, that is,

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

9. Integral Ring Extensions

Stacks in Representation Theory.

MA 206 notes: introduction to resolution of singularities

4. Images of Varieties Given a morphism f : X Y of quasi-projective varieties, a basic question might be to ask what is the image of a closed subset

121B: ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY. Contents. 6. Poincaré Duality

Transcription:

Puiseux series dynamics and leading monomials of escape regions Jan Kiwi PUC, Chile Workshop on Moduli Spaces Associated to Dynamical Systems ICERM Providence, April 17, 2012

Parameter space Monic centered cubic polynomials with marked critical points:

Parameter space Monic centered cubic polynomials with marked critical points: where (a, v) C 2. f a,v : z (z a) 2 (z + 2a) + v

Parameter space Monic centered cubic polynomials with marked critical points: f a,v : z (z a) 2 (z + 2a) + v where (a, v) C 2. After identification of (a, v) with ( a, v) one obtains the moduli space of cubic polynomials with marked critical points.

Parameter space Monic centered cubic polynomials with marked critical points: f a,v : z (z a) 2 (z + 2a) + v where (a, v) C 2. After identification of (a, v) with ( a, v) one obtains the moduli space of cubic polynomials with marked critical points. Critical points of f a,v are ±a. Critical value: v = f a,v (+a). Co-critical value 2a, since v = f a,v (+a) = f a,v ( 2a).

Periodic Curves For p 1, the periodic curve S p consists of all (a, v) such that +a has period p under f a,v.

Periodic Curves For p 1, the periodic curve S p consists of all (a, v) such that +a has period p under f a,v. S p C 2 is a smooth affine algebraic curve of degree d p where n p d n = 3 p 1.

Periodic Curves For p 1, the periodic curve S p consists of all (a, v) such that +a has period p under f a,v. S p C 2 is a smooth affine algebraic curve of degree d p where n p d n = 3 p 1. What is its topology?

Periodic Curves For p 1, the periodic curve S p consists of all (a, v) such that +a has period p under f a,v. S p C 2 is a smooth affine algebraic curve of degree d p where n p d n = 3 p 1. What is its topology? Is S p irreducible?

Periodic Curves For p 1, the periodic curve S p consists of all (a, v) such that +a has period p under f a,v. S p C 2 is a smooth affine algebraic curve of degree d p where n p d n = 3 p 1. What is its topology? Is S p irreducible? Bonifant,-,Milnor: the Euler characteristic is S p is (2 p)d p.

Periodic Curves For p 1, the periodic curve S p consists of all (a, v) such that +a has period p under f a,v. S p C 2 is a smooth affine algebraic curve of degree d p where n p d n = 3 p 1. What is its topology? Is S p irreducible? Bonifant,-,Milnor: the Euler characteristic is S p is (2 p)d p. What is the Euler characteristic of the smooth compactification of S p?

Periodic Curves For p 1, the periodic curve S p consists of all (a, v) such that +a has period p under f a,v. S p C 2 is a smooth affine algebraic curve of degree d p where n p d n = 3 p 1. What is its topology? Is S p irreducible? Bonifant,-,Milnor: the Euler characteristic is S p is (2 p)d p. What is the Euler characteristic of the smooth compactification of S p? Requires to compute the number N p of escape regions. (De Marco and Schiff, De Marco-Pilgrim).

Escape Regions The connectedness locus is compact. C(S p ) = { f a,v S p f n a,v( a) }

Escape Regions The connectedness locus C(S p ) = { f a,v S p fa,v( a) n } is compact. The escape locus E(S p ) = { f a,v S p fa,v( a) n } is open and every connected component is unbounded.

Escape Regions The connectedness locus is compact. The escape locus C(S p ) = { f a,v S p f n a,v( a) } E(S p ) = { f a,v S p f n a,v( a) } is open and every connected component is unbounded. A escape region U is a connected component of E(S p ): U is conformally isomorphic to punctured disk. The puncture is at U.

Asymptotics of critical periodic orbit For f a,v U, let a 0 = +a a 1 = v a p 1 a 0.

Asymptotics of critical periodic orbit For f a,v U, let a 0 = +a a 1 = v a p 1 a 0. Dynamical space picture. After conjugacy, f a,v (az)/a, we have:

Asymptotics of critical periodic orbit For f a,v U, let a 0 = +a a 1 = v a p 1 a 0. Dynamical space picture. After conjugacy, f a,v (az)/a, we have: a + o(a) or a j = 2a + o(a).

Asymptotics of critical periodic orbit For f a,v U, let a 0 = +a a 1 = v a p 1 a 0. Dynamical space picture. After conjugacy, f a,v (az)/a, we have: a + o(a) or a j = 2a + o(a). Bonifant and Milnor: Do the leading terms of a j a, for j = 1,..., p 1 determine U uniquely?

Leading monomials There exists µ 1 and a local coordinate ζ for U near such that a = 1 ζ µ.

Leading monomials There exists µ 1 and a local coordinate ζ for U near such that Then, a = 1 ζ µ. a j a a = holomorphic(ζ) = c k ζ k = k k 0 k k 0 c k ( ) k/µ 1. a

Leading monomials There exists µ 1 and a local coordinate ζ for U near such that Then, a = 1 ζ µ. a j a a = holomorphic(ζ) = c k ζ k = k k 0 k k 0 c k ( ) k/µ 1. a Leading monomial m j = c k0 ( 1 a ) k0 /µ.

Theorem. The leading monomial vector m = (m 1,..., m p 1, 0) determines the escape region uniquely.

Theorem. The leading monomial vector m = (m 1,..., m p 1, 0) determines the escape region uniquely. Corollary. (Bonifant,-,Milnor) Assume that the leading monomial vector of U is Then, for all j, (c 1 a k 1/µ,..., c p 1 a k p 1/µ ). a j Q(c 1,..., c p 1 )((a 1/µ )).

Equations For an escape region U, is a solution of v = a 1 = (+a or 2a) + a f p a,v(+a) = +a (*) k k 0 c k ( ) k/µ 1 a in some extension of Q((1/a)).

Field Put t instead of 1/a to get Q((t)) and study solutions of (*) in the algebraic closure of Q((t)): Q a t = Q a ((t 1/m )).

Field Put t instead of 1/a to get Q((t)) and study solutions of (*) in the algebraic closure of Q((t)): Q a t = Q a ((t 1/m )). Q a t is endowed with z = c k t k/m = e ord0(z) = e k0/m. k k 0

Field Put t instead of 1/a to get Q((t)) and study solutions of (*) in the algebraic closure of Q((t)): Q a t = Q a ((t 1/m )). Q a t is endowed with z = c k t k/m = e ord0(z) = e k0/m. k k 0 Complete it to get L.

Non-Archimedean problem For ν L, consider ψ ν (z) = t 2 (z 1)(z + 2) + ν L[z].

Non-Archimedean problem For ν L, consider ψ ν (z) = t 2 (z 1)(z + 2) + ν L[z]. ν is periodic parameter if ω + = +1 is periodic under ψ ν.

Non-Archimedean problem For ν L, consider ψ ν (z) = t 2 (z 1)(z + 2) + ν L[z]. ν is periodic parameter if ω + = +1 is periodic under ψ ν. In this case: ω + = +1 ω + 1 = ν ω+ p 1 ω+.

Non-Archimedean problem For ν L, consider ψ ν (z) = t 2 (z 1)(z + 2) + ν L[z]. ν is periodic parameter if ω + = +1 is periodic under ψ ν. In this case: ω + = +1 ω + 1 = ν ω+ p 1 ω+. It follows, ω + +1 + c t k/m + h.o.t. = j 2 + d t l/n + h.o.t.

Non-Archimedean problem For ν L, consider ψ ν (z) = t 2 (z 1)(z + 2) + ν L[z]. ν is periodic parameter if ω + = +1 is periodic under ψ ν. In this case: ω + = +1 ω + 1 = ν ω+ p 1 ω+. It follows, ω + +1 + c t k/m + h.o.t. = j 2 + d t l/n + h.o.t. The corresponding leading monomial are m(ω + ω + c t k/m ) = j 3 respectively.

Theorem. The leading monomial vector m = (m 1,..., m p 1, 0) determines the periodic parameter ν uniquely.

Dynamical Space The filled Julia set of ψ ν is K(ψ ν ) = {z L ψ n ν(z) }.

Dynamical Space The filled Julia set of ψ ν is K(ψ ν ) = {z L ψ n ν(z) }. ν 1 = ψ n ν(z) when z > 1.

Dynamical Space The filled Julia set of ψ ν is K(ψ ν ) = {z L ψ n ν(z) }. ν 1 = ψ n ν(z) when z > 1. Level 0 dynamical ball D 0 = { z 1}.

Dynamical Space The filled Julia set of ψ ν is K(ψ ν ) = {z L ψ n ν(z) }. ν 1 = ψ n ν(z) when z > 1. Level 0 dynamical ball D 0 = { z 1}. Level n set {ψ n ν(z) D 0 } is a disjoint union of finitely many dynamical balls of level n.

Dynamical Space The filled Julia set of ψ ν is K(ψ ν ) = {z L ψ n ν(z) }. ν 1 = ψ n ν(z) when z > 1. Level 0 dynamical ball D 0 = { z 1}. Level n set {ψ n ν(z) D 0 } is a disjoint union of finitely many dynamical balls of level n. Each level n + 1 ball is contained in, and maps onto, a level n ball.

Branches Maximal open balls in a closed ball D are parametrized by Q a. If ψ ν maps D onto D by degree d, then it induces a polynomial map of degree d in Q a.

Computing ω + j ω +. Fact. If B is a maximal open ball of a dynamical ball D l of level l, then B contains at most one dynamical ball of level l + 1.

Computing ω + j ω +. Fact. If B is a maximal open ball of a dynamical ball D l of level l, then B contains at most one dynamical ball of level l + 1. Consequence. If D l (ω + ) = D l (ω + j ) but D l+1 (ω + ) D l+1 (ω + j ), then ω + j ω + is the diameter of D l (ω + ) = D l (ω + j ).

Parameter space The level 0 parameter ball is D 0 = { ψ ν (ω + ) = ν 1}.

Parameter space The level 0 parameter ball is D 0 = { ψ ν (ω + ) = ν 1}. The parameters of level n { ψ n 1 ν (ω + ) 1} are a disjoint union of closed balls D n called level n parameter balls.

Parameter ball, dynamical balls and branch dynamics Proposition. Assume D l is a level l parameter ball. Then: D l = D l (ν) for all ν D l.

Parameter ball, dynamical balls and branch dynamics Proposition. Assume D l is a level l parameter ball. Then: D l = D l (ν) for all ν D l. The level l + 1 j dynamical ball ψ j ν(d l (ν)) is independent of ν D l.

Parameter ball, dynamical balls and branch dynamics Proposition. Assume D l is a level l parameter ball. Then: D l = D l (ν) for all ν D l. The level l + 1 j dynamical ball ψ j ν(d l (ν)) is independent of ν D l. The ψ ν action on maximal open balls is also independent of ν D l.

Parameter ball, dynamical balls and branch dynamics Proposition. Assume D l is a level l parameter ball. Then: D l = D l (ν) for all ν D l. The level l + 1 j dynamical ball ψ j ν(d l (ν)) is independent of ν D l. The ψ ν action on maximal open balls is also independent of ν D l. If p l is the smallest integer q such that ω + ψν q 1 (D l (ν)), then every periodic parameter in D l has period at least p l.

Centers Proposition. There exists a unique ν in D l which is periodic with period p l.

Centers Proposition. There exists a unique ν in D l which is periodic with period p l. Proof. The map T : D l D l defined by T(ν) = ( ψ p l 1 ν Dl (ν)) 1 (ω + ) is a strict contraction. Such ν is called the center of D l.

Level l + 1 correspondence Proposition. Let B be a maximal open ball of a parameter ball D l and consider any ν D l. B contains a parameter ball of level l + 1 if and only if B contains a dynamical ball of level l + 1. In this case, the level l + 1 balls are unique.

Leading monomials determine parameter balls Assume ν, ν have the same leading monomial vector.

Leading monomials determine parameter balls Assume ν, ν have the same leading monomial vector. Let us prove by induction on l. D l (ν) = D l (ν )

Leading monomials determine parameter balls Assume ν, ν have the same leading monomial vector. Let us prove by induction on l. D l (ν) = D l (ν ) Take ν l the center of level l.

Leading monomials determine parameter balls Assume ν, ν have the same leading monomial vector. Let us prove by induction on l. Take ν l the center of level l. D l (ν) = D l (ν ) There is a unique maximal open ball B in D l (ν l ) whose orbit is compatible with the leading monomial vector.

Leading monomials determine parameter balls Assume ν, ν have the same leading monomial vector. Let us prove by induction on l. Take ν l the center of level l. D l (ν) = D l (ν ) There is a unique maximal open ball B in D l (ν l ) whose orbit is compatible with the leading monomial vector. That is, ν, ν belong to B Thus ν, ν belong to the unique level l + 1 parameter ball contained in B. Hence, D l+1 (ν) = D l+1 (ν ).

Homework Given a sequence D 0 D 1. With centers ν 0, ν 1,. Which lie in L 0 ((t 1/m 0 )) L 1 ((t 1/m 1 )) Branner and Hubbard tell us how to compute m k.

Homework Given a sequence D 0 D 1. With centers ν 0, ν 1,. Which lie in L 0 ((t 1/m 0 )) L 1 ((t 1/m 1 )) Branner and Hubbard tell us how to compute m k. Compute L k.