Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 12 (2006), 7-12 National Centre for Agrarian Sciences

Similar documents
Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 12 (2006), National Centre for Agrarian Sciences

POSSIBILITY TO SELECT HETEROZYGOUS GENOTYPES BY POLLEN FERTILITY IN SEGREGATION HYBRID AND BACKCROSS PROGENIES CREATED based on NUCLEAR MALE STERILITY

Application of Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis in the Development of Table Seeded and Seedless Vine Cultivars (Vitis Vinifera L.

9-1 The Work of Gregor

Effect of the age and planting area of tomato (Solanum licopersicum l.) seedlings for late field production on the physiological behavior of plants

11-1 The Work of Gregor Mendel. The Work of Gregor Mendel

I. GREGOR MENDEL - father of heredity

EVALUATION OF TOLERANCE TO OSMOTIC STRESS OF EMMER GENOTYPES (TRITICUM DICOCCON SCHRANK) USING INDIRECT PHYSIOLOGICAL METHOD

HEREDITY: Objective: I can describe what heredity is because I can identify traits and characteristics

Lecture 2: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics

Resistance to powdery mildew and Cercospora leaf spot of multigerm dihaploid sugar beet lines and its inheritance in their hybrids

Lecture 08: Standard methods. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Tucson Winter Institute 9-11 Jan 2013

Evolution of phenotypic traits

Chapter Eleven: Heredity

1 Errors in mitosis and meiosis can result in chromosomal abnormalities.

Mendel and the Gene Idea. Biology Exploring Life Section Modern Biology Section 9-1

Biology. Revisiting Booklet. 6. Inheritance, Variation and Evolution. Name:

Just to review Genetics and Cells? How do Genetics and Cells Relate? The cell s NUCLEUS contains all the genetic information.

UNIT 3: GENETICS 1. Inheritance and Reproduction Genetics inheritance Heredity parent to offspring chemical code genes specific order traits allele

Genetic Analysis for Heterotic Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Using Six Parameters Model

Meiosis and Mendel. Chapter 6

Heredity and Genetics WKSH

Unit 2 Lesson 4 - Heredity. 7 th Grade Cells and Heredity (Mod A) Unit 2 Lesson 4 - Heredity

Ch 11.Introduction to Genetics.Biology.Landis

What is a sex cell? How are sex cells made? How does meiosis help explain Mendel s results?

Essential Questions. Meiosis. Copyright McGraw-Hill Education

Name Class Date. Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Prentice Hall. 33

Quantitative Genetics I: Traits controlled my many loci. Quantitative Genetics: Traits controlled my many loci

Directed Reading B. Section: Traits and Inheritance A GREAT IDEA

Lecture 4: Allelic Effects and Genetic Variances. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Tucson Winter Institute 7-9 Jan 2013

Interactive Biology Multimedia Courseware Mendel's Principles of Heredity. Copyright 1998 CyberEd Inc.

2 Numbers in parentheses refer to literature cited.

Biology 211 (1) Exam 4! Chapter 12!

Family resemblance can be striking!

Qualities of monogerm male-sterile sugar beet lines

Selection on Correlated Characters (notes only)

X-Sheet 3 Cell Division: Mitosis and Meiosis

AP Biology Essential Knowledge Cards BIG IDEA 1

Response of Introduced Sunflower Hybrids to Broomrape (Orobanche cumana W.)

Introduction to Genetics

Genetics_2011.notebook. May 13, Aim: What is heredity? Homework. Rd pp p.270 # 2,3,4. Feb 8 11:46 PM. Mar 25 1:15 PM.

Ch. 10 Sexual Reproduction and Genetics. p

Heredity and Evolution

GENE ACTION AND COMPARISON BETWEEN HALF DIALLEL ANALYSES METHODS UNDER SALINE SOIL STRESS CONDITIONS IN SUNFLOWER

Name Class Date. KEY CONCEPT Gametes have half the number of chromosomes that body cells have.

Genetics (patterns of inheritance)

1. The diagram below shows two processes (A and B) involved in sexual reproduction in plants and animals.

Plant Propagation PLS 3221/5222

Title: WS CH 18.1 (see p ) Unit: Heredity (7.4.1) 18.1 Reading Outline p Sexual Reproduction and Meiosis

Evolution of quantitative traits

GENETICS - CLUTCH CH.22 EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS.

Section 11 1 The Work of Gregor Mendel

The concept of breeding value. Gene251/351 Lecture 5

PRINCIPLES OF MENDELIAN GENETICS APPLICABLE IN FORESTRY. by Erich Steiner 1/

3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of selective breeding?

Kentucky Academic Standards Addressed By Zoo Program

Chapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity

HETEROSIS AND DEGREES OF DOMINANCE OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS IN HYBRIDS (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

Class Copy! Return to teacher at the end of class! Mendel's Genetics

Chapter 5. Heredity. Table of Contents. Section 1 Mendel and His Peas. Section 2 Traits and Inheritance. Section 3 Meiosis

Gregor Mendel and Heredity (Lexile 1010L)

Advance Organizer. Topic: Mendelian Genetics and Meiosis

Raghavendra P and S. Hittalmani * Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences GKVK, Bangalore , India

Chapter 10 Sexual Reproduction and Genetics

Introduction to Genetics

Biological Evolution

Cells And Heredity Study Guide B Answers

Introduction to Genetics

Sexual Reproduction and Genetics

COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR CURED LEAF YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT TRAITS IN BIDI TOBACCO (NicotianatabacumL.)

genome a specific characteristic that varies from one individual to another gene the passing of traits from one generation to the next

NOTES Ch 17: Genes and. Variation

Guided Notes Unit 6: Classical Genetics

Lecture 7 Correlated Characters

Changing Planet: Changing Mosquito Genes

Chapter 4 Lesson 1 Heredity Notes

AP Biology Curriculum Framework

Chapter 8: Introduction to Evolutionary Computation

Natural Selection. Population Dynamics. The Origins of Genetic Variation. The Origins of Genetic Variation. Intergenerational Mutation Rate

Animal Genetics - MENDELU

Genetic Algorithms. Donald Richards Penn State University

C.v. Dr. Mohammed Ali Hussein

Guided Reading Chapter 1: The Science of Heredity

Unit 3 - Molecular Biology & Genetics - Review Packet

Studies on genetic divergence on cucumber (Cucumber sativum L.)

EXTENT OF HETEROTIC EFFECTS FOR SEED YIELD AND COMPONENT CHARACTERS IN CASTOR (RICINUS COMMUNIS L.) UNDER SEMI RABI CONDITION

Chapter 17: Population Genetics and Speciation

How are traits passed from one generation to the next?

UNIT IV - FOUNDATIONS OF GENETIC ENGINEERING. Cell Reproduction and Genetics. Study Questions. 1. What is mitosis? 2. What is meiosis?

Chapter 11 INTRODUCTION TO GENETICS

MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF YOUNG AND MATURE :CLONES IN PARA RUBBER (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.)

Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter Vol Derkach 1

6.6 Meiosis and Genetic Variation. KEY CONCEPT Independent assortment and crossing over during meiosis result in genetic diversity.

Grade 7 Science Curriculum Maps

Introduction to Genetics

Mapping our Genes. Gregor Johann Mendel observed that organisms inherit traits through discrete units of inheritance which are now called genes.

UNIT 8 BIOLOGY: Meiosis and Heredity Page 148

3. Properties of the relationship matrix

... x. Variance NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES. Mice. Fruit Flies CHARACTERIZING A NORMAL DISTRIBUTION MEAN VARIANCE

Q Expected Coverage Achievement Merit Excellence. Punnett square completed with correct gametes and F2.

Transcription:

7 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 12 (2006), 7-12 National Centre for Agrarian Sciences Analysis of the Influence of Gene Environment Relations on the Variability of Correlation and Regression Indexes in Crosses between Seed and Seedless Varieties of Grape (Vitis Vinifera L.) V. ROYTCHEV Agricultural University, BG-4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria Abstract ROYTCHEV, V., 2006. Analysis of the influence of gene environment relations on the variability of correlation and regression indexes in crosses between seed and seedless varieties of grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 12: 7-12 We have studied the effect of gene-environment relations on the correlation and regression indexes of the features quantity of sugars and acids in generation parents of crosses between seed and seedless varieties of grapevine. It was established that the effect of genotype-environment relations on correlation indexes is clearly pronounced in varieties such as Armira, Hybrid 28-13 and offspring in generation of the crosses Super Early Bolgar x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka. The variety Russalka 1 and the cross Armira x Russalka 1 combine high correlation index to unproved genotype-environment effect. The phenotype regression indexes vary by genotype and by year and the effects of the genotype-environment relations are not well-pronounced, which makes possible their use for forecasting the selection of elite forms without consideration to the conditions of the environment. Key words: genotype-environment, variability, correlation and regression indexes, sugars and acids, crosses, seed and seedless sorts of vine Introduction Correlation and regression indexes are widely used in the process of selection because they offer possibilities for direct and indirect selection depending on correlating quantitative features. Normally used are their phenotype values, which depend on genetic and environmental factors. This complicates the objective interpretation of correlative dependencies, which vary depending on the conditions of the environment. The sources contain examples of various statistical methods of decomposition of phenotype correlations (Rokitsky, 1978; Genchev et al., 1975; Lidanski, 1988), as well as the model of Perkins and Jinks (1968). To use efficiently the various genotypes in selection of vine it is extremely important to analyze the effect of genes in relation with the environment. The quantity of sugars and acids in the grapes

8 of dessert varieties of vine has an important impact on its gustatory features and their accumulation in the berries of the grape depends on many factors: variety characteristics, agricultural techniques, environment, etc (Stoev, 1983; Stoev and Zankov, 1983). The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of genes that interact with the environment on the correlation and regression indexes between the features quantity of sugars and acids in the grapes of parent sorts and generation of hybrids between seed and seedless varieties of grapevine. Materials and Methods The study covers parent varieties P 1, and generation of crosses between seed and seedless dessert grapevine varieties Super Early Bolgar x Russalka, Armira x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka 1. The analysis of hybrids was conducted during the period 1999-2002 at the selection field of the Viticulture Department of the Agricultural University Plovdiv. The quantity of sugars and acids in the grapes of 20 plants was read separately for each cross and each parent variety. The quantity of sugars (s, %) was measured at the stage of technological (ready to eat) maturity with an ABBE laboratory refractometer, and the total quantity of acids (a, g/dm 3 ) by titration with 0.1 n NaOH (Bulgarian Ampelography, 1990). The information about the phenotypic correlation (r k3 ) and regression (b k3 ) indexes was submitted to mathematical analysis, which includes the genes that interact with the environment as well as r and b derived from the mean values of the trait, in which this effect is absent and which in fact represent their genotypic values (Snedecor, 1957; Rokitsky, 1967). The effect of environment interacting genes is characterized by the differences between them ( d1 = r r and d = b k b ) obtained in the different 2 3 years (environments). The reliability of this effect is expressed through the criterion χ 2 by comparing the experimental data r and b k3 to the theoretical one r of 3 k and b while assessing parameters m, ej and d. To calculate χ 2 was used the formula 2 2 2 χ = Σ d 1/ S x ( ) V. Roytchev (Mater and Jinks, 1971). To assess parameters m, e j and d, knowing that df = m-3 was used a mathematical model, which decomposes the phenotypic values of correlating traits by environments P xij = m + e j + d + gd, where parameter gd determines the genes that interact with the environment (Perkins and Jinks, 1968; Fedin et al., 1980). In cases where χ 2 = 0 or is not proved, the effect of genes interacting with the environment is missing or is weak. The phenotypic values of the correlation and regression indexes in these genotypes can be used to forecast the selection without consideration to the conditions of the environment, while in cases not proved it leads to errors. Depending on the values of the first correlating trait is established the expected significance of the other trait using the regression equation (y = a + bx) (Lakin, 1990). In the analysis are also applied the genotype values of r and b, which make possible

Analysis of the Influence of Gene Environment Relations... 9 the comparison between P 1, and generations best expressed through their regression lines. Results and Discussion The results of the analysis of the effect of environment interacting genes on correlation and regression indexes of the traits quantity of sugars and acids in grape by crosses are shown in Table 1. They prove that the phenotypic correlation indexes ( r ) by years vary within a wide range and, to few exceptions, they are almost always with a negative sign. High Table 1 Values of the correlation coefficients r кз and r кз Hybrid combination I Super Early Bolgar х Russalka 1 II Armira х Russalka 1 III Hybrid 28-13 х Russalka P 1 P 1 P 1 r кз - by years I II III IV and proved are the values of the variety Russalka 1 and those of the offspring of generation of the crosses Armira x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka. The correlation dependency in the varieties Super early Bolgar and Rusalka and in the cross between Super Early Bolgar x Russalka 1 is relatively small and not reliable. The correlation indexes calculated from the mean values ( r ) by years also show important variability to the exception of Hybrid 28-13. Reliability is typical of those of the varieties Russalka 1 and Armira and the crosses Armira x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka. From the σ (St) χ 2 r -0.068 0.023 0.155-0.322-0.097 2.64 0.201 +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ -0.689-0.788-0.679-0.731-0.824 1.92 0.05 +++ 0.077 0.155-0.118-0.077-0.35 11.48 0.128 + + -0.175-0.262-0.236-0.133-0.438 3.96 0.058 +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ -0.689-0.788-0.679-0.731-0.824 1.92 0.05 +++ +++ ++ + +++ -0.765-0.779-0.56-0.56-0.782 2.87 0.123 + +++ +++ -0.243 0.177-0.451 0.7 0.092 24.42 0.508 + -0.394-0.243-0.275-0.532-0.281 2.18 0.131 + +++ + + +++ -0.46-0.681-0.449 0.114 0.444 90.05 0.339 df = 1 Р 5% = 3.84 Р 1% = 6.63 Р 0.1% = 10.75 rкз

10 V. Roytchev point of view of genetic selection, particularly interesting is the influence of the effect of genes interacting with the environment on the variability of this parameter expressed by the difference between r and b, which is best illustrated by the criterion χ 2. It offers the possibility to establish the reliability between the experimental and theoretical values of the analysed trait. Interesting for the selection are these varieties and crosses for which Р on < Р 0.1%. The specified criterion is reliable only in the varieties Armira and Hybrid 28-13 and crosses Super Early Bolgar x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka. Close to reliability Р 5%, which is the limit, are the varieties Super Early Bolgar and Russalka and the cross Armira x Russalka 1, which means that the genotype-environmental effects are relatively pronounced. This is also confirmed by the Table 2 Values of the regression coefficients b кз and b кз Hybrid combination I Super Early Bolgar х Russalka 1 II Armira х Russalka 1 III Hybrid 28-13 х Russalka variability of the phenotypic values of r by year expressed through the mean square deviation (σ r ). The value of this parameter is higher in Hybrid 28-13 followed by the crosses Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka, Super Early Bolgar, Russalka, Super Early Bolgar x Russalka 1, Armira x Russalka 1 and less in Armira and Russalka 1. In vine selection regression indexes are most used in the choice of source material for sex hybridization and to forecast the selection in heterozygote generations. The values in Table 2 prove that this trait varies within a certain range by cross as well as by year. The reliability of the differences between experimental values of the regression indexes b, which also reflect the effect of the genotype-environment interaction, and b without this effect is expressed by the criterion χ 2. The r кз - by years a кз I II III IV (St) χ 2 σ b P 1-0.024 0.004 0.037-0.115 4.6-0.028 0.46 0.065-0.492-0.627-0.578-0.503 15.4-0.536 0.02 0.064 0.03 0.074-0.034-0.033 7-0.118 0.62 0.052 P 1-0.061-0.102-0.085-0.051 6.6-0.138 0.13 0.023-0.492-0.627-0.578-0.503 15.4-0.536 0.02 0.064-0.55-0.732-0.306-0.468 13.7-0.553 0.18 0.177 P 1-0.156 0.315-0.799 1.024 5.4 0.081 21.91 0.560-0.12-0.083-0.084-0.167 4.9-0.09 0.08 0.04-0.258-0.389-0.547 0.199 15.3-0.567 1.26 0.320 df = 1 Р 5% = 3.84 Р 1% = 6.63 Р 0.1% = 10.75 b кз

Analysis of the Influence of Gene Environment Relations... 11 results show that it is only in Hybrid 28-13 the zero-hypothesis is not proved. In all other cases χ 2 < P 5%, which means that the effect of the genotype-environment interaction varies within the tolerance range. The variability of the regression indexes in generation of the different crosses and their parents by year, expressed by the mean square deviation (σ b ), is relatively small, between 0.023 and 0.177 for Armira and Armira x Russalka 1, and in the cross Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka and Hybrid 28-13 it is in the range 0.320-0.560. Acids, g/dm 3 25 20 15 10 5 0-2 -1 0 1 2 Fig. 1. Super Early Bolgar х Russalka 1 Acids, g/dm 3 25 20 15 10 Fig. 2. Armira х Russalka 1 P1 P2 F1 Sugar, % P1 P2 F1 5 Sugar, % 0-2 -1 0 1 2 Acids, g/m 3 25 20 15 10 P1 P2 F1 5 Sugar, % 0-2 -1 0 1 2 Fig. 3. Hybrid 28-13 х Russalka The values of the regression indexes obtained from the mean values of the traits by year b are negative, to the exception of Hybrid 28-13. The comparison by parent and by cross describes the variability of the correlation and regression dependencies. This is best illustrated by the regression lines on Figures 1-3. As one can see in these diagrams, the slope of the regression lines is reversed except for the line of Hybrid 28-13. For the variety Russalka 1 and the crosses Armira x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka the slope of the regression lines is big, which means that with the quantity of sugar increasing the acids decrease quickly while in the others the variability is small. From the point of view of genetics the comparison between parents and their respective offspring in generation is of particular interest. The regression line of the cross Super Early Bolgar x Russalka 1 is similar to that of Super Early Bolgar and the line of Armira x Russalka 1 is similar to that of the variety Russalka 1 while the line of the cross Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka is quite different from the parents one.

12 V. Roytchev Conclusions The phenotypic correlation indexes of the variety Russalka 1 and the crosses Armira x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka are proved at the 3 rd 1 st rank. Relatively high but not proved are those of the varieties Hybrid 28-13 and Russalka. Similar are the indexes obtained from the mean values by year where proved are the varieties Russalka 1 and Armira as well as the crosses Armira x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka. The effect of the genotype-environment relation on the correlation indexes is pronounced in the varieties Armira and Hybrid 28-13 and in offspring of generation of the crosses Super Early Bolgar x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka, while in the other varieties and crosses the effect of the genotype-environment relation are relatively less pronounced. Of particular value for the selection are the variety Russalka 1 and the cross Armira x Russalka 1, which combine high correlation index to unproved genotype-environment effect. The phenotypic regression indexes vary by genotype and by year. The effect of the genotype-environment interaction is not much pronounced while the zero-hypothesis is highly proved, which makes it possible to use them as base for forecast of the selection without consideration to the conditions of the environment. The slope of the regression lines for the separate crosses, to the exception of that for Hybrid 28-13, are reverse and this means that when the quantity of sugars in the grape increases the acids decrease. This dependence is the best pronounced in the variety Russalka 1 and in the crosses Armira x Russalka 1 and Hybrid 28-13 x Russalka. Received August, 18, 2005; accepted December, 19, 2005 References Bulgarian Ampelography. 1990. General Ampelography. Publ. BAS, Sofia, Vol. 1, 296 pp. (Bg). Fedin, М. А., D. Ya. Silis and A.Smiryaev, 1980. Statistical Methods of Genetic Analysis. Moscow, Kolos, 207 pp. (Ru). Genchev, G., E. Marinkov, V. Iovcheva and A. Ognjanova, 1975. Biometrical Methods in Plant Growing, Genetics and Breeding. Sofia, Zemizdat, 322 pp. (Bg). Lakin, G. F., 1990. Biometry. Moscow, Visshaya shkola, 352 pp. (Ru). Lidanski, T., 1980. Statistical Methods in Biology and Agriculture. Zemizdat, Sofia, 374 pp. (Bg). Mather, K. and J. L. Jinks, 1971. Biometrical Genetics: The study of continuous variations. - New Jork: Cornell University Press, 382 pp. Rokitsky, P. F., 1967. Biological Statistics. Minsk, Vysheishaya shkola, p. 326 (Ru). Rokitsky, P. F., 1978. Introduction to Statistical Genetics. 2 nd edition, Minsk, Vysheishaya shkola, p. 448 (Ru). Perkins, J. M. and J. L. Jinks, 1968. Environmental and genotype - environmental components of variability III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity, 23: 339-356. Perkins, J. M. and J. L. Jinks, 1968. Environmental and genotype - environmental components of variability IV. Non-linear interactions for multiple inbred lines Heredity, 23: 525-535. Stoev, K., 1983. Basic regularities of growth and maturation of grapevine berries. Grapevine physiology and principles of its cultivation. Sofia, Bulgarian Academy of Science, vol. 2: 261-322. Stoev, K. D. and Z. D. Zankov, 1983. Physiology of the growth and development of seed and offspring of grape. Physiology of grape and fundaments of its reproduction, Bulgarian Academy of Science, vol. 2: 323-368. Snedeco,r G.W., 1957. Statistical metods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology. The Iowa State College Press. Ames Iowa, 534 pp.