Non-renormalization Theorem and Cyclic Leibniz Rule in Lattice Supersymmetry

Similar documents
Recent developments in lattice supersymmetry

Defining Chiral Gauge Theories Beyond Perturbation Theory

Current Status of Link Approach for Twisted Lattice SUSY Noboru Kawamoto Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

arxiv: v2 [hep-lat] 23 Dec 2008

Lecture 12 Holomorphy: Gauge Theory

N=1 Global Supersymmetry in D=4

Introduction to Lattice Supersymmetry

Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, Matrix Models and Geometric Transitions

Roni Harnik LBL and UC Berkeley

S-CONFINING DUALITIES

A Lattice Path Integral for Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics

Non-Supersymmetric Seiberg duality Beyond the Planar Limit

From Susy-QM to Susy-LT

Reφ = 1 2. h ff λ. = λ f

Generalized Gaugino Condensation: Discrete R-Symmetries and Supersymmetric Vacua

Neutrinos and Fundamental Symmetries: L, CP, and CP T

Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory

Chiral symmetry breaking, instantons, and monopoles

Vector Superfields. A Vector superfield obeys the constraint:

arxiv:hep-lat/ v1 26 Feb 2004

Chern-Simons Theories and AdS/CFT

Semper FI? Supercurrents, R symmetries, and the Status of Fayet Iliopoulos Terms in Supergravity. Keith R. Dienes

Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee

Lecture II: Owe Philipsen. The ideal gas on the lattice. QCD in the static and chiral limit. The strong coupling expansion at finite temperature

(Im)possible emergent symmetry and conformal bootstrap

Two Examples of Seiberg Duality in Gauge Theories With Less Than Four Supercharges. Adi Armoni Swansea University

Quantum Field Theory III

Lattice QCD study for relation between quark-confinement and chiral symmetry breaking

Supersymmetric Gauge Theories in 3d

Fuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models

125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification

G2 gauge theories. Axel Maas. 14 th of November 2013 Strongly-Interacting Field Theories III Jena, Germany

THE MASTER SPACE OF N=1 GAUGE THEORIES

Topological susceptibility in (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD with overlap fermion

Lattice simulation of supersymmetric gauge theories

Topological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality

D-term Dynamical SUSY Breaking. Nobuhito Maru (Keio University)

Instanton effective action in - background and D3/D(-1)-brane system in R-R background

Supersymmetry breaking and Nambu-Goldstone fermions in lattice models

Supersymmetric Skyrme Model. Muneto Nitta (Keio U.,Jp)

Spontaneous breaking of supersymmetry

A Note on Supersymmetry Breaking. Stephen D.H. Hsu, Myckola Schwetz. Department of Physics Yale University New Haven, CT

arxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 5 Nov 2018

Flavor Physics in the multi-higgs doublet models induced by the left-right symmetry

Supersymmetric Flows for Supersymmetric Field Theories

Badis Ydri Ph.D.,2001. January 19, 2011

Ginsparg-Wilson Fermions and the Chiral Gross-Neveu Model

Coupling Selection Rules in Heterotic Orbifold Compactifications

A Localization Computation in Confining Phase

T -Parity in Little Higgs Models a

Nonperturbative Study of Supersymmetric Gauge Field Theories

Manifolds of Fixed Points and Duality in Supersymmetric Gauge Theories

A New Regulariation of N = 4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

Rigid SUSY in Curved Superspace

1 Susy in 4d- Notes by Horatiu Nastase A very basic introduction (survival guide)

Introduction to defects in Landau-Ginzburg models

Aspects of N = 2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories in Three Dimensions

Catalytic effects of monopole in QCD

Supercurrents. Nathan Seiberg IAS

Black Hole Microstate Counting using Pure D-brane Systems

Who is afraid of quadratic divergences? (Hierarchy problem) & Why is the Higgs mass 125 GeV? (Stability of Higgs potential)

SUSY Breaking in Gauge Theories

New Model of massive spin-2 particle

QCD Instantons: SUSY and NOT

Universality check of the overlap fermions in the Schrödinger functional

hep-lat/ Dec 94

D-term Dynamical SUSY Breaking. Nobuhito Maru (Keio University)

PNJL Model and QCD Phase Transitions

Naturalizing SUSY with the relaxion and the inflaton

Supersymmetry Highlights. Kevin Hambleton

Symmetries, Groups Theory and Lie Algebras in Physics

Instantons in supersymmetric gauge theories. Tobias Hansen Talk at tuesday s Werkstatt Seminar January 10, 2012

A non-perturbative view of the Higgs hierarchy problem

AdS/CFT duality. Agnese Bissi. March 26, Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics Erice. Mathematical Institute University of Oxford

't Hooft anomalies, 2-charge Schwinger model, and domain walls in hot super Yang-Mills theory

Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and Geometry by Nicholas Mee of Trinity College, Cambridge. October 1989

2T-physics and the Standard Model of Particles and Forces Itzhak Bars (USC)

Integrable spin systems and four-dimensional gauge theory

ON ULTRAVIOLET STRUCTURE OF 6D SUPERSYMMETRIC GAUGE THEORIES. Ft. Lauderdale, December 18, 2015 PLAN

Supersymmetry Breaking

E 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale

T.W. Chiu, Chung-Yuan Christian Univ, May 13, 2008 p.1/34. The Topology in QCD. Ting-Wai Chiu Physics Department, National Taiwan University

1/N Expansions in String and Gauge Field Theories. Adi Armoni Swansea University

Aspects of (0,2) theories

PoS(LAT2006)208. Diseases with rooted staggered quarks. Michael Creutz Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA

Lecture 7 SUSY breaking

Electric-Magnetic Duality, Monopole Condensation, And Confinement In N = 2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory

Techniques for exact calculations in 4D SUSY gauge theories

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification

Anomalies, Conformal Manifolds, and Spheres

Studies of large-n reduction with adjoint fermions

Lattice QCD at non-zero temperature and density

Tests at Colliders. Summer School on the SME June 17, 2018 Mike Berger. I. Top quark production and decay II. Neutral meson oscillations

Naturalizing Supersymmetry with the Relaxion

LIBERATION ON THE WALLS IN GAUGE THEORIES AND ANTI-FERROMAGNETS

Neutrino Models with Flavor Symmetry

Resurgence Structure to All Orders of Multi-bions in Deformed SUSY Quantum Mechanics

Orientifold planar equivalence.

R-Invariant Dilaton Fixing

Schwarzschild Radius and Black Hole Thermodynamics with Corrections from Simulations of SUSY Matrix Quantum Mechanics. Jun Nishimura (KEK)

Transcription:

1 Non-renormalization Theorem and Cyclic Leibniz Rule in Lattice Supersymmetry Makoto Sakamoto (Kobe University) in collaboration with Mitsuhiro Kato and Hiroto So based on JHEP 1305(2013)089; arxiv:1311.4962; and in progress Talk at Osaka University, January 6, 2015

Non-perturbative dynamics of supersymmetry 2 SUSY algebra SUSY breaking Nicolai mapping confinement chiral sym. breaking Supersymmetry AdS/CFT instantons condensation strong-weak duality monopoles

Supersymmetry breaking 3 S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 3702 A theorem for SUSY breaking Supersymmetry cannot be broken at any finite order of perturbation theory unless it is broken at "tree" level. O'Raifeataigh mechanism Fayet-Illiopoulous U(1) D term SUSY breaking via extra dimensions M.S., M.Tachibana & K. Takenaga, Phys. Lett. B458 (1999) 231

Supersymmetry breaking 3 S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 3702 A theorem for SUSY breaking Supersymmetry cannot be broken at any finite order of perturbation theory unless it is broken at "tree" level. O'Raifeataigh mechanism Fayet-Illiopoulous U(1) D term SUSY breaking via extra dimensions M.S., M.Tachibana & K. Takenaga, Phys. Lett. B458 (1999) 231 This theorem may imply that non-perturbative analysis is important for SUSY breaking!

History 4 Lattice Theory is undoubtedly one of powerful tools to reveal non-perturbative dynamics of field theories!

History 4 Lattice Theory is undoubtedly one of powerful tools to reveal non-perturbative dynamics of field theories! However, for more than 30 years no one has succeeded to construct satisfactory lattice supersymmetric models!

Purpose of my talk 5 I explain what is an obstacle to realize supersymmetry on lattice. R No-Go Theorem

Purpose of my talk 5 I explain what is an obstacle to realize supersymmetry on lattice. R No-Go Theorem I propose a new idea to construct lattice supersymmetric models. R Cyclic Leibniz Rule R Non-renormalization Theorem

Plan of my talk 6 1. Obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 2. Attempts to construct lattice SUSY models 3. No-Go theorem 4. Complex SUSY QM on lattice 5. Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 6. Q-exact form and cohomology 7. Summary

Plan of my talk 6 1. Obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 2. Attempts to construct lattice SUSY models 3. No-Go theorem 4. Complex SUSY QM on lattice 5. Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 6. Q-exact form and cohomology 7. Summary

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 7 We want to find lattice SUSY transf. lattice SUSY transf. lattice action such that with the SUSY algebra translation on lattice

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 7 We want to find lattice SUSY transf. lattice SUSY transf. lattice action such that with the SUSY algebra translation on lattice One might replace by a difference operator on lattice.

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 7 We want to find lattice SUSY transf. lattice SUSY transf. lattice action such that with the SUSY algebra translation on lattice One might replace by a difference operator on lattice. Since satisfy the Leibniz rule then, we need to find which satisfies the Leibniz rule: Leibniz rule

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 8 However, simple difference operators do not satisfy the Leibniz rule on lattice. For example, forward difference operator

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 8 However, simple difference operators do not satisfy the Leibniz rule on lattice. For example, forward difference operator

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 8 However, simple difference operators do not satisfy the Leibniz rule on lattice. For example, forward difference operator

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 8 However, simple difference operators do not satisfy the Leibniz rule on lattice. For example, forward difference operator

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 8 However, simple difference operators do not satisfy the Leibniz rule on lattice. For example, forward difference operator Indeed, all known (local) difference operators do not satisfy the Leibniz rule!

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 9 Is it possible to construct a difference operator satisfying the Leibniz rule on lattice?

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 9 Is it possible to construct a difference operator satisfying the Leibniz rule on lattice? The answer is negative!

An obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 9 Is it possible to construct a difference operator satisfying the Leibniz rule on lattice? The answer is negative! No-Go Theorem M.Kato, M.S. & H.So, JHEP 05(2008)057 There is no difference operator satisfying the following three properties: i) translation invariance ii) locality iii) Leibniz rule This prevents us from the realization of SUSY algebra on lattice! I will prove this theorem later.

Plan of my talk 10 1. Obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 2. Attempts to construct lattice SUSY models 3. No-Go theorem 4. Complex SUSY QM on lattice 5. Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 6. Q-exact form and cohomology 7. Summary

Fine tuning 11 Give up manifest SUSY on lattice!

Fine tuning 11 Give up manifest SUSY on lattice! Fine tuning is necessary to restore it in the continuum limit.

Fine tuning 11 Give up manifest SUSY on lattice! Fine tuning is necessary to restore it in the continuum limit. In general, there exist various relevant SUSY breaking terms.

Fine tuning 11 Give up manifest SUSY on lattice! Fine tuning is necessary to restore it in the continuum limit. In general, there exist various relevant SUSY breaking terms. It turns out to be hard to control it!

Fine tuning 11 Give up manifest SUSY on lattice! Fine tuning is necessary to restore it in the continuum limit. In general, there exist various relevant SUSY breaking terms. It turns out to be hard to control it! Exact SUSY on lattice is necessary!

Fine tuning 12 There is an exception: Curci-Veneziano, NPB292(1987)555.

Fine tuning 12 There is an exception: R N=1 SYM (gluon+an adjoint Majorana fermion) F 1 a F a i D CP 4 F a F a gluon Curci-Veneziano, NPB292(1987)555. gluino

Fine tuning 12 There is an exception: R N=1 SYM (gluon+an adjoint Majorana fermion) F 1 a F a i D CP 4 F a F a gluon R The relevant SUSY breaking term is only the gluino mass m! (The gauge invariance guarantees the massless gluons.) Curci-Veneziano, NPB292(1987)555. gluino

Fine tuning 12 There is an exception: R N=1 SYM (gluon+an adjoint Majorana fermion) F 1 a F a i D CP 4 F a F a gluon R The relevant SUSY breaking term is only the gluino mass m! (The gauge invariance guarantees the massless gluons.) Curci-Veneziano, NPB292(1987)555. gluino chiral symmetry m SUSY

Fine tuning 13 Domain wall fermions kink mass 5th dimension m y x,y x,y localized fermion zero mode massless gluino! R no need for a fine tuning! R two extra parameters: m Ls L Nishimura, PLB406(1997)215; Neuberger, PRD57(1998)5417. m y m R The other chirality appears on the opposite wall for finite Ls. Ls R y

Fine tuning Overlap fermions 14 Maru-Nishimura, IJMPA13(1998)2841; Neuberger, PRD57(1998)5417. Ginsparg-Wilson relation D D ad D lattice spacing chiral symmetry ad massless gluino SUSY will appear in the continuum limit!

Nicolai map 15

Nicolai map 15 fermion determinant

Nicolai map 15 fermion determinant Nicolai map Nicolai, PLB89 (1980) 341; NPB176 (1980) 419 with the properties:

Nicolai map 15 fermion determinant Nicolai map Nicolai, PLB89 (1980) 341; NPB176 (1980) 419 with the properties: Gaussian integral!

Nicolai map 16 Start with the Gaussian integral on lattice!

Nicolai map 16 Nicolai map with the properties: Start with the Gaussian integral on lattice!

Nicolai map 16 Nicolai map with the properties: Start with the Gaussian integral on lattice!

Nicolai map 16 Sakai-Sakamoto, NPB229 (1983) 173 Nicolai map with the properties: Start with the Gaussian integral on lattice!

Nilpotent SUSY 17 Most of the recent works have been based on nilpotent SUSYs to avoid the problem of the Leibniz rule!

Nilpotent SUSY 17 Most of the recent works have been based on nilpotent SUSYs to avoid the problem of the Leibniz rule!

Nilpotent SUSY 17 Most of the recent works have been based on nilpotent SUSYs to avoid the problem of the Leibniz rule!

Nilpotent SUSY 17 Most of the recent works have been based on nilpotent SUSYs to avoid the problem of the Leibniz rule!

Nilpotent SUSY 17 Most of the recent works have been based on nilpotent SUSYs to avoid the problem of the Leibniz rule!

Nilpotent SUSY 17 Most of the recent works have been based on nilpotent SUSYs to avoid the problem of the Leibniz rule! Question Are nilpotent SUSYs enough to restore the full SUSYs in the continuum limit?

Nilpotent SUSY 17 Most of the recent works have been based on nilpotent SUSYs to avoid the problem of the Leibniz rule! Question Are nilpotent SUSYs enough to restore the full SUSYs in the continuum limit? Our results suggest that the answer is negative!

Nilpotent SUSY 18 N=2 extended SUSY algebra in 2-dim. Q i Q j ij P i,j

Nilpotent SUSY 18 N=2 extended SUSY algebra in 2-dim. Q i Q j ij P i,j Q i i

Nilpotent SUSY 18 N=2 extended SUSY algebra in 2-dim. Q i Q j ij P i,j Q i i P P

Nilpotent SUSY 18 N=2 extended SUSY algebra in 2-dim. Q i Q j ij P i,j Q i i P P Q-exact SUSY S d 2 x with

Nilpotent SUSY 18 N=2 extended SUSY algebra in 2-dim. Q i Q j ij P i,j Q i i P P Q-exact SUSY S d 2 x with does not induce any translations!

Nilpotent SUSY 18 N=2 extended SUSY algebra in 2-dim. Q i Q j ij P i,j Q i i P P Q-exact SUSY S d 2 x with does not induce any translations! Q-exact SUSY on lattice

Hamiltonian formulation 19 Time is continuous. Sakai-Sakamoto, NPB229(1983)173; Elitzur-Schwimmer, NPB226(1983)109. An exact SUSY can be realized in the time-direction. This guarantees the pairing between bosonic and fermionic states.

Deconstruction SUSY 20 Cohen-Kaplan-Katz-Unsal, JHEP12(2003)031. U kn d SYM in 3+1 dim. (continuous) dimensional reduction: U kn d extended SYM matrix model in 0+0 dim. Z N d -orbifolding kn d U k SYM in d-dim. (lattice) Some of SUSY are broken by orbifolding. k

Perfect action 21 R block-spin transformation So-Ukita, PLB457(1999)314; Bietenholz, MPLA14(1999)51. n R perfect action dx f n (x) (x) e S L n d e n n n Sc n R action invariance n continuum action S c ( (x) (x)) S c ( (x)) S L ( n n ) S L ( n ) dx f n (x) (x) Success only for the free Wess-Zumino model!

Ichimatsu lattice 22 R lattice action S lat n n ^ Ichimatsu R fermionic invariance n n real Staggered fermions Itoh-Kato-Sawanaka-So-Ukita, NP(Suppl)106(2002)947. n n ^ ^ ^ n ^ U n : link variables It is unclear that in the continuum limit the lattice model reduces to a continuum SUSY model!

Non-commutative approach 23 R new "difference" operator D'Adda-Kanamori-Kawamoto-Nagata, NPB707(2005)100. R difference operator f n g n f n g n f n ^ g n R shift operator ^ T f n f n T T satisfies the Leibniz rule! Dirac-Kähler fermions lattice models with full SUSY!

Infinite flavors M. Kato, M.S. & H.So, JHEP 05(2008)057 We find a solution satisfying the Leibniz rule. D ab m;n d a b m n,a b m n, a b C abc l,m;n l n,b n m,a a b,c characteristic features translationally invariant local (= holomorphic) non-trivial connection between lattice sites and flavor indices fi need for infinite flavors! local in the space direction but "non-local" in the flavor direction! 24

Plan of my talk 25 1. Obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 2. Attempts to construct lattice SUSY models 3. No-Go theorem 4. Complex SUSY QM on lattice 5. Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 6. Q-exact form and cohomology 7. Summary

No-Go theorem 26 No-Go Theorem M.Kato, M.S. & H.So, JHEP 05(2008)057 There is no difference operator satisfying the following three properties: i) translation invariance ii) locality iii) Leibniz rule

A proof of No-Go theorem 27 To prove the theorem, we generalize the difference operator and the field product as follows: R extension of difference operator R extension of field product

A proof of No-Go theorem 27 To prove the theorem, we generalize the difference operator and the field product as follows: R extension of difference operator forward difference operator R extension of field product normal product

A proof of No-Go theorem 28 Q Is it possible to construct a difference operator satisfying R extension of difference operator forward difference operator R extension of field product normal product

A proof of No-Go theorem 29 R translation invariance

A proof of No-Go theorem 29 R translation invariance R locality (exponential damping)

A proof of No-Go theorem 29 R translation invariance R locality (exponential damping) holomorphic representation coefficients of Laurent series

A proof of No-Go theorem An important observation is that 30 locality

A proof of No-Go theorem An important observation is that 30 locality holomorphy on Annulus domain

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 31

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 31

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 31 translation invariance

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 31 translation invariance

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 31 translation invariance in holomorphic rep.

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 32

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 32

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 32 By virtue of the identity theorem on holomorphic functions, the domain can be extended to the whole domain without

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 32 By virtue of the identity theorem on holomorphic functions, the domain can be extended to the whole domain without

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 32 By virtue of the identity theorem on holomorphic functions, the domain can be extended to the whole domain without

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 32 non-holomorphic and non-local By virtue of the identity theorem on holomorphic functions, the domain can be extended to the whole domain without

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 32 non-holomorphic and non-local By virtue of the identity theorem on holomorphic functions, the domain can be extended to the whole domain without

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 32 non-holomorphic and non-local By virtue of the identity theorem on holomorphic functions, the domain can be extended to the whole domain without

A proof of No-Go theorem Leibniz rule 32 non-holomorphic and non-local By virtue of the identity theorem on holomorphic functions, the domain can be extended to the whole domain without There is no difference operator which satisfies the Leibniz rule!! No-Go Theorem!

How to escape from No-Go theorem 33 In order to escape from the No-Go theorem, we may abandon one of the three requirements. i) translation inv. ii) locality iii) Leibniz rule

How to escape from No-Go theorem 33 In order to escape from the No-Go theorem, we may abandon one of the three requirements. i) translation inv. no translation inv. ii) locality iii) Leibniz rule

How to escape from No-Go theorem 33 In order to escape from the No-Go theorem, we may abandon one of the three requirements. i) translation inv. no translation inv. Sysytematic analysis is difficult! ii) locality iii) Leibniz rule

How to escape from No-Go theorem 33 In order to escape from the No-Go theorem, we may abandon one of the three requirements. i) translation inv. no translation inv. Sysytematic analysis is difficult! ii) locality non-local difference operator or non-local interaction iii) Leibniz rule

How to escape from No-Go theorem 33 In order to escape from the No-Go theorem, we may abandon one of the three requirements. i) translation inv. no translation inv. Sysytematic analysis is difficult! ii) locality non-local difference operator or non-local interaction The continuum limit is highly non-trivial! iii) Leibniz rule

How to escape from No-Go theorem 33 In order to escape from the No-Go theorem, we may abandon one of the three requirements. i) translation inv. no translation inv. Sysytematic analysis is difficult! ii) locality iii) Leibniz rule non-local difference operator or non-local interaction The continuum limit is highly non-trivial! Modify the Leibniz rule! We will take this approach!

Our approach to construct lattice SUSY model 34 Nilpotent SUSY algebra + Cyclic Leibniz rule Avoid the problem of translations on lattice. A modified version of the Leibniz rule

Plan of my talk 35 1. Obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 2. Attempts to construct lattice SUSY models 3. No-Go theorem 4. Complex SUSY QM on lattice 5. Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 6. Q-exact form and cohomology 7. Summary

Complex SUSY quantum mechanics on lattice 36 Lattice action difference operator: field product: inner product:

N=2 nilpotent SUSYs 37 N=2 Nilpotent SUSYs:

N=2 nilpotent SUSYs 37 N=2 Nilpotent SUSYs:

N=2 nilpotent SUSYs 37 N=2 Nilpotent SUSYs:

N=2 nilpotent SUSYs 37 N=2 Nilpotent SUSYs: We call this Cyclic Leibniz rule.

Cyclic Leibniz rule 38 We have found that the Cyclic Leibniz Rule guarantees the N=2 nilpotent SUSYs. Cyclic Leibniz Rule (CLR) vs. Leibniz Rule (LR)

Cyclic Leibniz rule 38 We have found that the Cyclic Leibniz Rule guarantees the N=2 nilpotent SUSYs. Cyclic Leibniz Rule (CLR) vs. Leibniz Rule (LR)

Cyclic Leibniz rule 38 We have found that the Cyclic Leibniz Rule guarantees the N=2 nilpotent SUSYs. Cyclic Leibniz Rule (CLR) vs. Leibniz Rule (LR) No-Go theorem

Cyclic Leibniz rule 38 We have found that the Cyclic Leibniz Rule guarantees the N=2 nilpotent SUSYs. Cyclic Leibniz Rule (CLR) vs. Leibniz Rule (LR)! No-Go theorem The cyclic Leibniz rule ensures a lattice analog of vanishing surface terms! on lattice CLR in continuum

An example of CLR 39 The important fact is that the cyclic Leibniz rule can be realized on lattice, though the Leibniz rule cannot!

An example of CLR 39 The important fact is that the cyclic Leibniz rule can be realized on lattice, though the Leibniz rule cannot! An explicit example of the Cyclic Leibniz Rule : lattice spacing a M.Kato, M.S. & H.So, JHEP 05(2013)089 which satisfy i)translation invariance, ii)locality and iii)cyclic Leibniz Rule.

An example of CLR 39 The important fact is that the cyclic Leibniz rule can be realized on lattice, though the Leibniz rule cannot! An explicit example of the Cyclic Leibniz Rule : lattice spacing a M.Kato, M.S. & H.So, JHEP 05(2013)089 which satisfy i)translation invariance, ii)locality and iii)cyclic Leibniz Rule.! The field product should be non-trivial!

Advantages of CLR 40 Advantages of our lattice model with CLR are given by CLR no CLR nilpotent SUSYs Nicolai maps surface terms non-renormalization theorem cohomology

Advantages of CLR 40 Advantages of our lattice model with CLR are given by CLR no CLR nilpotent SUSYs Nicolai maps surface terms non-renormalization theorem cohomology

Advantages of CLR 40 Advantages of our lattice model with CLR are given by CLR no CLR nilpotent SUSYs Nicolai maps surface terms non-renormalization theorem cohomology

Advantages of CLR 40 Advantages of our lattice model with CLR are given by CLR no CLR nilpotent SUSYs Nicolai maps surface terms non-renormalization theorem cohomology

Advantages of CLR 40 Advantages of our lattice model with CLR are given by CLR no CLR nilpotent SUSYs Nicolai maps surface terms non-renormalization theorem cohomology

Advantages of CLR 40 Advantages of our lattice model with CLR are given by CLR no CLR nilpotent SUSYs Nicolai maps surface terms non-renormalization theorem cohomology non-trivial trivial

Advantages of CLR 40 Advantages of our lattice model with CLR are given by CLR no CLR nilpotent SUSYs Nicolai maps surface terms non-renormalization theorem cohomology non-trivial trivial

Plan of my talk 41 1. Obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 2. Attempts to construct lattice SUSY models 3. No-Go theorem 4. Complex SUSY QM on lattice 5. Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 6. Q-exact form and cohomology 7. Summary

Non-renormalization theorem in continuum 42 One of the striking features of SUSY theories is the non-renormalization theorem.

Non-renormalization theorem in continuum 42 One of the striking features of SUSY theories is the non-renormalization theorem. 4d N=1 Wess-Zumino model in continuum chiral superfield superpotential D term (kinetic terms) F term (potential terms)

Non-renormalization theorem in continuum 42 One of the striking features of SUSY theories is the non-renormalization theorem. 4d N=1 Wess-Zumino model in continuum chiral superfield superpotential D term (kinetic terms) F term (potential terms) Non-renormalization Theorem There is no quantum correction to the F-terms in any order of perturbation theory. Grisaru, Seigel, Rocek, NPB159 (1979) 429

Essence of non-renormalization theorem 43 D term (kinetic terms) F term (potential terms)

Essence of non-renormalization theorem 43 D term F term (kinetic terms) (potential terms) Holomorphy plays an important role in the non-renormalization theorem. chiral superfield anti-chiral superfield tree superpotential coupling constant

Essence of non-renormalization theorem 43 tree superpotential D term F term (kinetic terms) (potential terms) Holomorphy plays an important role in the non-renormalization theorem. chiral superfield anti-chiral superfield coupling constant effective superpotential quantum corrections

Essence of non-renormalization theorem 43 tree superpotential D term F term (kinetic terms) (potential terms) Holomorphy plays an important role in the non-renormalization theorem. chiral superfield anti-chiral superfield coupling constant effective superpotential quantum corrections holomorphy anti-holomorphy

Essence of non-renormalization theorem 43 tree superpotential D term F term (kinetic terms) (potential terms) Holomorphy plays an important role in the non-renormalization theorem. chiral superfield anti-chiral superfield coupling constant effective superpotential quantum corrections holomorphy No quantum correction!! anti-holomorphy Weff Wtree N.Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B318 (1993) 469

Essence of non-renormalization theorem 43 tree superpotential D term F term (kinetic terms) (potential terms) Holomorphy plays an important role in the non-renormalization theorem. chiral superfield anti-chiral superfield coupling constant anti-chiral superfield chiral superfield holomorphy No quantum correction!! anti-holomorphy Weff Wtree N.Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B318 (1993) 469

Difficulty in defining chiral superfield on lattice 44 The holomorphy requires that the F term W depends only on the chiral superfield x, which is defined by in continuum

Difficulty in defining chiral superfield on lattice 44 The holomorphy requires that the F term W depends only on the chiral superfield x, which is defined by? in continuum on lattice

Difficulty in defining chiral superfield on lattice 44 The holomorphy requires that the F term W depends only on the chiral superfield x, which is defined by? in continuum on lattice However, the above definition of the chiral superfield is ill-defined because any products of chiral superfields are not chiral due to the breakdown of LR on lattice! the breakdown of the Leibniz rule on lattice

Superfield formulation in our lattice model 45 Lattice superfields

Superfield formulation in our lattice model 45 Lattice superfields supersymmetry transformations

Superfield formulation in our lattice model 45 Lattice superfields supersymmetry transformations Lattice action in superspace

Superfield formulation in our lattice model 45 Lattice superfields supersymmetry transformations Lattice action in superspace SUSY invariant with CLR

Superfield formulation in our lattice model 46 general Lattice action in superspace

Superfield formulation in our lattice model 46 general Lattice action in superspace! is SUSY-invariant if and only if depends only on and is written into the form and has to obey CLR. M.Kato, M.S., H.So, in preparation

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 47

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 47 quantum corrections

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 47 quantum corrections SUSY-invariance with CLR forbids these!

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 47 quantum corrections SUSY-invariance with CLR forbids these! To prove it, we extend to superfields! This extension preserves SUSY-invariace! N.Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B318 (1993) 469

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 47 quantum corrections SUSY-invariance with CLR forbids these! To prove it, we extend to superfields! This extension preserves SUSY-invariace! N.Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B318 (1993) 469 The holomorphic property is realized in our lattice model!

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 48 To restrict the form of conserved charges:, we use the

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 48 To restrict the form of conserved charges:, we use the

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 48 To restrict the form of conserved charges:, we use the zero charge combination

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 48 To restrict the form of conserved charges:, we use the zero charge combination

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 49

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 49

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 49

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 49 Tree diagrams! These diagrams should be excluded from because it consists of 1PI diagrams!

Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 49 Tree diagrams! These diagrams should be excluded from because it consists of 1PI diagrams! non-renormalization No quantum correction!

Plan of my talk 50 1. Obstacle to realize SUSY on lattice 2. Attempts to construct lattice SUSY models 3. No-Go theorem 4. Complex SUSY QM on lattice 5. Non-renormalization theorem on lattice 6. Q-exact form and cohomology 7. Summary

Q-exact form and cohomology 51

Q-exact form and cohomology 51 invariant under because of the nilpotency:

Q-exact form and cohomology 51 invariant under because of the nilpotency: invariant under only if

Q-exact form and cohomology 51 invariant under because of the nilpotency: invariant under only if -exact

Q-exact form and cohomology 51 invariant under because of the nilpotency: invariant under only if -exact

Q-exact form and cohomology 51 invariant under because of the nilpotency: invariant under only if -exact

Q-exact form and cohomology 51 invariant under because of the nilpotency: -exact invariant under only if -closed but not exact

Q-exact form and cohomology 51 invariant under because of the nilpotency: -exact invariant under only if -closed but not exact which has the properties: CLR M.Kato, M.S., H.So in preparation

Q-exact form and cohomology 51 invariant under because of the nilpotency: -exact invariant under only if -closed but not exact which has the properties: CLR M.Kato, M.S., H.So in preparation The type II terms are cohomologically non-trivial with CLR!

Summary 52 We have proved the No-Go theorem that the Leibniz rule cannot be realized on lattice under reasonable assumptions. We proposed a lattice SUSY model equipped with the cyclic Leibniz rule as a modified Leibniz rule. A striking feature of our lattice SUSY model is that the nonrenormalization theorem holds for a finite lattice spacing. Our results suggest that the cyclic Leibniz rule grasps important properties of SUSY.

Remaining tasks 53 Extension to higher dimensions We have to extend our analysis to higher dimensions. Especially, we need to find solutions to CLR in more than one dimensions. inclusion of gauge fields Nilpotent SUSYs with CLR full SUSYs Are nilpotent SUSYs extended by CLR enough to guarantee full SUSYs?

History repeats itself! 54

History repeats itself! chiral gauge theory 54

History repeats itself! chiral gauge theory E left-handed right-handed 54 0

History repeats itself! chiral gauge theory E left-handed right-handed 54 0 continuous theory There is no renormalization scheme to preserve the chiral structure nonperturbatively!

History repeats itself! chiral gauge theory E left-handed right-handed 54 0 continuous theory There is no renormalization scheme to preserve the chiral structure nonperturbatively! lattice theory The lattice theory can make it possible!!

History repeats itself! chiral gauge theory E 0 continuous theory lattice theory left-handed right-handed There is no renormalization scheme to preserve the chiral structure nonperturbatively! The lattice theory can make it possible!! SUSY theory 54

History repeats itself! chiral gauge theory E 0 continuous theory lattice theory left-handed right-handed There is no renormalization scheme to preserve the chiral structure nonperturbatively! The lattice theory can make it possible!! SUSY theory E 0 bosons F fermions F 54

History repeats itself! chiral gauge theory E 0 continuous theory lattice theory left-handed right-handed There is no renormalization scheme to preserve the chiral structure nonperturbatively! The lattice theory can make it possible!! SUSY theory E bosons F fermions F 0 continuous theory There is no renormalization scheme to preserve the SUSY structure nonperturbatively! 54

History repeats itself! chiral gauge theory E 0 continuous theory lattice theory left-handed right-handed There is no renormalization scheme to preserve the chiral structure nonperturbatively! The lattice theory can make it possible!! SUSY theory E bosons F fermions F 0 continuous theory There is no renormalization scheme to preserve the SUSY structure nonperturbatively! lattice theory The lattice theory will make it possible again!! 54