Symmetries of meromorphic connections over Riemann Surfaces

Similar documents
On the structure of Picard-Vessiot extensions - Joint work with Arne Ledet - Kolchin Seminar in Differential Algebra May 06, 2006

Classification of Algebraic Subgroups of Lower Order Unipotent Algebraic Groups

Differential Groups and Differential Relations. Michael F. Singer Department of Mathematics North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC USA

Linear ODEs and ruled surfaces

Tutorial on Differential Galois Theory III

Exercises for algebraic curves

Liouvillian solutions of third order differential equations

Lie Theory of Differential Equations and Computer Algebra

z, w = z 1 w 1 + z 2 w 2 z, w 2 z 2 w 2. d([z], [w]) = 2 φ : P(C 2 ) \ [1 : 0] C ; [z 1 : z 2 ] z 1 z 2 ψ : P(C 2 ) \ [0 : 1] C ; [z 1 : z 2 ] z 2 z 1

Existence of a Picard-Vessiot extension

A density theorem for parameterized differential Galois theory

COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION: LECTURE 13

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

Picard-Vessiot theory, algebraic groups and group schemes

ON THE CONSTRUCTIVE INVERSE PROBLEM IN DIFFERENTIAL GALOIS THEORY #

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES

Fields and Galois Theory. Below are some results dealing with fields, up to and including the fundamental theorem of Galois theory.

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann

r/lt.i Ml s." ifcr ' W ATI II. The fnncrnl.icniccs of Mr*. John We mil uppn our tcpiiblicnn rcprc Died.

H A M M IG K S L IM IT E D, ' i. - I f

.-I;-;;, '.-irc'afr?*. P ublic Notices. TiffiATRE, H. aiety

W i n t e r r e m e m b e r t h e W O O L L E N S. W rite to the M anageress RIDGE LAUNDRY, ST. H E LE N S. A uction Sale.

Handout - Algebra Review

Differential dependency of solutions of q-difference equations

Generic Picard-Vessiot extensions for connected by finite groups Kolchin Seminar in Differential Algebra October 22nd, 2005

A b r i l l i a n t young chemist, T h u r e Wagelius of N e w Y o r k, ac. himself with eth

What is a (compact) Riemann surface?

Math 213br HW 12 solutions

Real and p-adic Picard-Vessiot fields

Sample algebra qualifying exam

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 2 SOLUTIONS TO THE PRACTICE EXAM AND HOMEWORK

and u and v are orthogonal if and only if u v = 0. u v = x1x2 + y1y2 + z1z2. 1. In R 3 the dot product is defined by

' Liberty and Umou Ono and Inseparablo "

PALACE PIER, ST. LEONARDS. M A N A G E R - B O W A R D V A N B I E N E.

Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule

On the Definitions of Difference Galois Groups

The group law on elliptic curves

MANY BILLS OF CONCERN TO PUBLIC

PanHomc'r I'rui;* :".>r '.a'' W"»' I'fltolt. 'j'l :. r... Jnfii<on. Kslaiaaac. <.T i.. %.. 1 >

THE GALOIS CORRESPONDENCE FOR LINEAR HOMOGENEOUS DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS

An algorithm for solving second order linear homogeneous differential equations

Then the blow up of V along a line is a rational conic bundle over P 2. Definition A k-rational point of a scheme X over S is any point which

ENTRY GROUP THEORY. [ENTRY GROUP THEORY] Authors: started Mark Lezama: October 2003 Literature: Algebra by Michael Artin, Mathworld.

Di erential Algebraic Geometry, Part I

AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES

The Hilbert-Mumford Criterion

The Automorphisms of a Lie algebra

SPECIAL VALUES OF j-function WHICH ARE ALGEBRAIC

Algebra Exam Fall Alexander J. Wertheim Last Updated: October 26, Groups Problem Problem Problem 3...

1. Group Theory Permutations.

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

MATH 101A: ALGEBRA I, PART D: GALOIS THEORY 11

Number Theory and Algebraic Equations. Odile Marie-Thérèse Pons

0. Introduction. Math 407: Modern Algebra I. Robert Campbell. January 29, 2008 UMBC. Robert Campbell (UMBC) 0. Introduction January 29, / 22

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS

Codes and Rings: Theory and Practice

What are stacks and why should you care?

Twists and residual modular Galois representations

Examples: Solving nth Order Equations

The Homogenous Lorentz Group

TOPOLOGICAL GALOIS THEORY. A. Khovanskii

Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar

AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF. Tatsuhiko Hatase for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics presented on

Extension theorems for homomorphisms

Algebra homework 6 Homomorphisms, isomorphisms

Are ζ-functions able to solve Diophantine equations?

Each is equal to CP 1 minus one point, which is the origin of the other: (C =) U 1 = CP 1 the line λ (1, 0) U 0

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA

Homogeneous Coordinate Ring

1. Let r, s, t, v be the homogeneous relations defined on the set M = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6} by

San Francisco State University

Self-Dual Codes and Invariant Theory

Graduate Preliminary Examination

1. Projective geometry

Math 581 Problem Set 7 Solutions

On values of Modular Forms at Algebraic Points

The Weak Lefschetz for a Graded Module

On Projective Planes

CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN ELLIPTIC CURVES IN EDWARDS-BERNSTEIN AND WEIERSTRASS FORMS

Group Theory. 1. Show that Φ maps a conjugacy class of G into a conjugacy class of G.

Algebra SEP Solutions

STRUCTURE THEORY OF UNIMODULAR LATTICES

MA 254 notes: Diophantine Geometry

1 Rings 1 RINGS 1. Theorem 1.1 (Substitution Principle). Let ϕ : R R be a ring homomorphism

Invariants and hyperelliptic curves: geometric, arithmetic and algorithmic aspects

JOHAN S PROBLEM SEMINAR

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Res + X F F + is defined below in (1.3). According to [Je-Ki2, Definition 3.3 and Proposition 3.4], the value of Res + X

A SUBSPACE THEOREM FOR ORDINARY LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Complex Algebraic Geometry: Smooth Curves Aaron Bertram, First Steps Towards Classifying Curves. The Riemann-Roch Theorem is a powerful tool

Current algebras and higher genus CFT partition functions

Algebraic group actions and quotients

Differential Central Simple Algebras and Picard Vessiot Representations

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

Algebra Questions. May 13, Groups 1. 2 Classification of Finite Groups 4. 3 Fields and Galois Theory 5. 4 Normal Forms 9

n P say, then (X A Y ) P

The Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

ne varieties (continued)

Transcription:

Symmetries of meromorphic connections over Riemann Surfaces Camilo Sanabria The CUNY Graduate Center February 13 th, 2009

Example Consider: y + 3(3z2 1) z(z 1)(z + 1) y + 221z4 206z 2 + 5 12z 2 (z 1) 2 (z + 1) 2 y + 374z6 673z 4 + 254z 2 + 5 54z 3 (z 1) 3 (z + 1) 3 y = 0 The equation is invariant under the automorphism z z; and, setting z 2 = x the equation transforms into: y + 3(2x 1) x(x 1) y + 329x2 + 41 350 48x 2 (x 1) 2 y + 374x3 673x 2 + 254x + 5 432x 3 (x 1) 3 y = 0 The interplay between the Galois Groups and this symmetry is given by: 1 G 54 F SL 3(C) 36 z z 1

Example Consider: y + 21(z2 z + 1) 25z 2 (z 1) 2 y + 21( 2z3 + 3z 2 5z + 2) 50z 3 (z 1) 3 y = 0 The equation is invariant under the automorphism z 1 z; and, setting z(z 1) = x the equation transforms into: y + 6 4x 1 y + 21(x 1) 25x 2 (4x 1) y 21(x 2) 50x 3 (4x 1) y = 0 The interplay between the Galois Groups and this symmetry is given by: 1 A 5 I h z 1 z 1

Picard-Vessiot Extensions and Galois Group We take a finite field extension K of C(z); and, we extend the differentiation z =. We consider a matrix differential equation X = AX were A = (aj i ) is an n n matrix with coefficients in K.

Picard-Vessiot Extensions and Galois Group We take a finite field extension K of C(z); and, we extend the differentiation z =. We consider a matrix differential equation X = AX were A = (aj i ) is an n n matrix with coefficients in K. A Picard-Vessiot extension is obtained in the following fashion.

Picard-Vessiot Extensions and Galois Group We take a finite field extension K of C(z); and, we extend the differentiation z =. We consider a matrix differential equation X = AX were A = (aj i ) is an n n matrix with coefficients in K. A Picard-Vessiot extension is obtained in the following fashion. First, we turn K[X i by setting X i j j, 1 det = a i k X k j. ] into a differential ring extension of K

Picard-Vessiot Extensions and Galois Group We take a finite field extension K of C(z); and, we extend the differentiation z =. We consider a matrix differential equation X = AX were A = (aj i ) is an n n matrix with coefficients in K. A Picard-Vessiot extension is obtained in the following fashion. First, we turn K[X i j, 1 det ] into a differential ring extension of K by setting Xj i = a i k Xj k. Then, the Picard-Vessiot extension is given by considering the fraction field of K[Xj i 1, det ]/I where I is a maximal differential ideal.

Picard-Vessiot Extensions and Galois Group We take a finite field extension K of C(z); and, we extend the differentiation z =. We consider a matrix differential equation X = AX were A = (aj i ) is an n n matrix with coefficients in K. A Picard-Vessiot extension is obtained in the following fashion. First, we turn K[X i j, 1 det ] into a differential ring extension of K by setting Xj i = a i k Xj k. Then, the Picard-Vessiot extension is given by considering the fraction field of K[Xj i 1, det ]/I where I is a maximal differential ideal. A representation of the Galois Group in GL n (C) is given by where (g i j ) : X i j X i k g k j. G = {(g i j ) GL n (C) (g i j )(I ) = (I )}

Galois Correspondence Proposition: Let E be a Picard-Vessiot Extension for X = AX, and f E. Then f K (g i j )(f ) = f (g i j ) G Setting I = ker(k[x i j, 1 det ] E). K[X i j, 1 det ] φ E C[X i j ]G φ K

Galois Correspondence Proposition: Let E be a Picard-Vessiot Extension for X = AX, and f E. Then f K (g i j )(f ) = f (g i j ) G Setting I = ker(k[x i j, 1 det ] E). K[X i j, 1 det ]/I E C[X i j ]G / ker(φ ) K

Compoint s Theorem Theorem: Assume G is reductive and unimodular. Let P 1,..., P r be a basis of G-invariants in C[X i j ].

Compoint s Theorem Theorem: Assume G is reductive and unimodular. Let P 1,..., P r be a basis of G-invariants in C[X i j ]. Let f 1,..., f r K be such that P i f i I (i {1,..., r}).

Compoint s Theorem Theorem: Assume G is reductive and unimodular. Let P 1,..., P r be a basis of G-invariants in C[X i j ]. Let f 1,..., f r K be such that P i f i I (i {1,..., r}). Then I is (algebraically) generated over K[X i P 1 f 1,..., P r f r. j, 1 det ] by

Compoint s Theorem Theorem: Assume G is reductive and unimodular. Let P 1,..., P r be a basis of G-invariants in C[X i j ]. Let f 1,..., f r K be such that P i f i I (i {1,..., r}). Then I is (algebraically) generated over K[X i P 1 f 1,..., P r f r. j, 1 det ] by In other words, if G is unimodular and reductive, the ideal I in K[X i j, 1 det ] φ E C[X i j ]G φ K is uniquely determined by the map φ : C[X i j ] G K

Fano Group Take the homogeneous part of ker(φ ), i.e. ker(φ ) h = {P C[X i j ] G φ(p) = 0 and P homogeneous} G. Fano considered the group of automorphisms of P n2 1 = Proj(C[Xj i ]) mapping the projective variety define by ker(φ ) h into itself.

Fano Group Take the homogeneous part of ker(φ ), i.e. ker(φ ) h = {P C[X i j ] G φ(p) = 0 and P homogeneous} G. Fano considered the group of automorphisms of P n2 1 = Proj(C[Xj i ]) mapping the projective variety define by ker(φ ) h into itself. The group contains the projective Galois group.

Fano Group Take the homogeneous part of ker(φ ), i.e. ker(φ ) h = {P C[X i j ] G φ(p) = 0 and P homogeneous} G. Fano considered the group of automorphisms of P n2 1 = Proj(C[Xj i ]) mapping the projective variety define by ker(φ ) h into itself. The group contains the projective Galois group. Alas, the group is too big! So we slightly modify the setting.

Fano Group We assume G reductive and unimodular. Return to C[X i j ]G

Fano Group We assume G reductive and unimodular. Return to C[X i j ]G The homogeneous ideal ker(φ ) h defines a surface.

Fano Group We assume G reductive and unimodular. Return to C[X i j ]G The homogeneous ideal ker(φ ) h defines a surface. Actually in Spec(C[X i j ] G ) V (ker(φ ) h ) D det is a ruled surface.

Fano Group We assume G reductive and unimodular. Return to C[X i j ]G The homogeneous ideal ker(φ ) h defines a surface. Actually in Spec(C[X i j ] G ) V (ker(φ ) h ) D det is a ruled surface. On the other hand V (ker(φ )) defines a curve in this surface.

Next time We will see how the symmetries are going to be given by the automorphisms of the surface V (ker(φ ) h ) D det Spec(C[X i j ] G ) sending the curve V (ker(φ )) into itself.