Solar particle events contribution in the space radiation exposure on electronic equipment

Similar documents
Analysis distribution of galactic cosmic rays particle energy with polar orbit satellite for Geant4 application

BIRA-IASB, 30th October 2006

H. Koshiishi, H. Matsumoto, A. Chishiki, T. Goka, and T. Omodaka. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

RussianSEE test approach: available standards, test variables, difficulties and future trends

Cosmic Ray Effects on Micro- Electronics (CRÈME) Tools Brian Sierawski 2017 SEESAW

DIN EN : (E)

NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center Data and Services. Terry Onsager and Howard Singer NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center

Internal Charging Hazards in Near-Earth Space during Solar Cycle 24 Maximum: Van Allen Probes Measurements

SIMULATION OF SPACE RADIATION FOR NANOSATELLITES IN EARTH ORBIT *

Space Radiation Mitigation for Fox-1

S5p INTENTIONALLY BLANK


A New JPL Interplanetary Solar HighEnergy Particle Environment Model

Solar Particle Events in Aviation and Space. Günther Reitz Insitute of Aerospace Medicine German Aerospace Center, DLR, Cologne, Germany

Radiation Effects in MMIC Devices

Predicting On-Orbit SEU Rates

Your Partner in Environment Monitoring

The Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) Investigation for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

USING SPACE WEATHER VARIABILITY IN EVALUATING THE RADIATION ENVIRONMENT DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR NASA'S CONSTELLATION PROGRAM

Monitoring solar energetic particles with ESA SREM units

A Predictive Code for ISS Radiation Mission Planning

Jovian electrons as an instrument of investigation of the interplanetary medium structure

On the possibility to forecast severe radiation storms by data from surface and space-born facilities

SPENVIS Tutorial: Radiation models in SPENVIS and their accuracy

Analysis of the EVA Doses Observed by Liulin-Type Instruments on ISS

Radiation tolerant passive and active optical fiber products for use in space environments

Rationale for a European Space Weather Programme

Low energy electrons at MEO during observed surface charging events

Specification of electron radiation environment at GEO and MEO for surface charging estimates

Radiation Environment and Radiation Dosimetry in the Upper Atmosphere

OSTST, October 2014

Engineering Models for Galactic Cosmic Rays and Solar Protons: Current Status

RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS AND ULF-ACTIVITY DYNAMICS DURING CIR- AND CME-STORMS IN MAY 2005

Introduction. Neutron Effects NSEU. Neutron Testing Basics User Requirements Conclusions

Air Force Research Laboratory

Evaluation of Galactic Cosmic Rays Models Using AMS2 Data. Francis F. Badavi 1. Christopher J. Mertens 2 Tony C. Slaba 2

What are the causes for the spread of GLE parameters deduced from NM data?

Peculiarities of the thermal regime of the Russian plain depending on tidal oscillation Earth rotation speed

Activities of the Japanese Space Weather Forecast Center at Communications Research Laboratory

Space Weather and Satellite System Interaction

This project has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie-Sklodowska-Curie grant

APPLICATION OF POLYMERIC NANO COMPOSITES AT LOW EARTH ORBIT AND GEOSYNCHRONOUS EARTH ORBIT

Low energy electrons in the inner Earth s magnetosphere

Research on the radiation exposure memory effects in AlGaAs heterostructures

Modeling of microporous silicon betaelectric converter with 63 Ni plating in GEANT4 toolkit*

The South Atlantic Anomaly drift on the proton flux data of satellite experiments

Study of the radiation fields in LEO with the Timepix detector

Van Allen Probes Mission and Applications

Radiation Environments, Effects and Needs for ESA Missions

Electron Polar Cap and the Boundary oœ Open Geomagnetic Field Lines

CRaTER Science Requirements

Introduction to Radiation Testing Radiation Environments

Radiation Effects on Electronics. Dr. Brock J. LaMeres Associate Professor Electrical & Computer Engineering Montana State University

Tritel: 3D Silicon Detector Telescope used for Space Dosimetry. Tamás Pázmándi, Attila Hirn, Sándor Deme, István Apáthy, Antal Csőke, *László Bodnár

The Los Alamos Laboratory: Space Weather Research and Data

U.S. Radiation Dose Limits for Astronauts

Myagkova I.N., Panasyuk M.I., Kalegaev V.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow

PRACTICE NO. PD-AP-1309 PREFERRED PAGE 1 OF 5 RELIABILITY PRACTICES ANALYSIS OF RADIATED EMI FROM ESD EVENTS CAUSED BY SPACE CHARGING

18-th Workshop on Radiation Monitoring for the International Space Station. 3-5 September 2013, Budapest, Hungary

Solar Cell Radiation Environment Analysis Models (SCREAM)

ROBUSTA cubesat. Radiation On Bipolar University Satellite Test Application. Student project. Partnership : Montpellier University + CNES

Forecasting Solar Energetic Particle Events Using Changes in Electron Flux

Overview of the ISS radiation environment observed during EXPOSE- R2 mission in

THE NEWEST HUNGARIAN COSMIC RADIATION MEASUREMENT RESULTS IN THE STRATOSPHERE USING STRATOSPHERIC BALLOONS AND SOUNDING ROCKETS

Estec final presentation days 2018

Solar Energetic Particles measured by AMS-02

Spacecraft reflectors thermomechanical analysis

Base metal thermocouples drift rate dependence from thermoelement diameter

IN preparation for the Galileo system, the European Space

Modelling the effects of solar activity onto the Greek national electric grid

Verification of Short-Term Predictions of Solar Soft X-ray Bursts for the Maximum Phase ( ) of Solar Cycle 23

Jovian Radiation Environment Models at JPL

The Effects of Atmospheric Variations on the High Energy Radiation Environment at the Surface of Mars

Space Radiation Dosimetry - Recent Measurements and Future Tasks

Substorm-associated effects in the variations of low energy electron fluxes in the inner magnetosphere: Does the substorm s strength matter?

Theoretical Assessment of Aircrew Exposure to Galactic Cosmic Radiation Using the FLUKA Monte Carlo Code

Uppsala universitet Institutionen för astronomi och rymdfysik Anders Eriksson

Geomagnetic storms. Measurement and forecasting

Correction for PMT temperature dependence of the LHCf calorimeters

Space Station Ionizing Radiation Design Environment

Geant4 Based Space Radiation Application for Planar and Spherical Geometries

Lomonosov Moscow State University. NUCLEON Chemical Composition and Energy Spectra of Cosmic Rays at TeV

TITLE. Paper presented at HPS 54 th Annual Meeting, July 12-16, Minneapolis, MN USA

MATERIALS FOR LIGHTWEIGHT RADIATION SHIELD FOR CANADIAN POLAR COMMUNICATIONS AND WEATHER (PCW) SATELLITE MISSION

Operational Impacts of Space Weather

Deep Space Test Bed. POC Deep Space Test Bed (DSTB)

Displacement Damage Characterization of Electron Radiation in. Triple-Junction GaAs Solar Cells

Overview of the KMA's Space Weather Service and R&D Program

NMDB - the European neutron monitor database

Time variations of proton flux in the Earth inner radiation belt for years based on the PAMELA and the ARINA data

Numerical modeling of solar irradiance on earth's surface

Solar-terrestrial relation and space weather. Mateja Dumbović Hvar Observatory, University of Zagreb Croatia

Triggering of great earthquakes: calculation and analysis of combined tidal effect of the Moon and Sun

Even if not soon to. humans will still be in Space (ISS)

Ultimate spectrum of solar/stellar cosmic rays. Space Research Institute, Profsoyuznaya st. 84/32, Moscow , Russia

Radiation Belt Analyses: needs, data and analysis

Gate simulation of Compton Ar-Xe gamma-camera for radionuclide imaging in nuclear medicine

Space environment (natural and artificial) Realtime solar activity and space environment information for spacecraft operation

Space Weather. ~ Affects of solar activities onto Earth. Cause-Effect Time Intervals range from immediate (precisely, 8 minutes) to several days.

Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the Fermi LAT collaboration

Transcription:

Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Solar particle events contribution in the space radiation exposure on electronic equipment To cite this article: Vasily S Anashin et al 2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 632 012077 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 148.251.232.83 on 10/01/2019 at 05:51

Solar particle events contribution in the space radiation exposure on electronic equipment Vasily S Anashin 1, Grigory А Protopopov 1, 3, Оlga S Kozyukova 1, Ninel N Sitnikova 2 1 Branch of JSC URSC - ISDE, Moscow, Russia 2 JSC Academician M.F.Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems, Zheleznogorsk, Russia E-Mail: conf@niikp.org Abstract. The article presented the on-board measurement results of dose sensors. We carried out the estimation of the contribution of solar protons in a dose rate value during solar events. We determined the solar proton events conditions when these events can markedly affect the reliability of on-board equipment operation. 1. Introduction Space radiation is the most critical natural influencing factor which limits spacecraft s electronic equipment life time. The main components of space radiation are particles from Van Allen belts, solar and galactic cosmic rays [1]. Space radiation accounts from 30 to 50 per cent of qualified failure (because of total ionizing dose, displacement damage and single event effects), even though this percentage is higher due to the stimulation of other types of failures, first of all, electrostatic [2]. At the present time there is a need for carrying out permanent monitoring of space radiation characteristics for the determination of the degree of space radiation exposure on electronic equipment and for the forecast of spacecraft operability. For these purposes, the monitoring system of space radiation exposure on spacecraft electronic equipment was made on demand of Roscosmos [3]. 2. Space radiation exposure on the radio-electronic equipment engineering monitoring system 2.1. The monitoring system aim and tasks The main aim of the monitoring system is the increase of spacecraft active shelf life. The monitoring system is not the alternative and is an addition to the existing scientific monitoring system and is used, generally, for: Measurement of space radiation impact on the spacecraft electronic equipment. Calculation and control of the spacecraft remaining lifetime. Management of the structural and algorithmic approach for active lifetime increase. Forecasting of space radiation impact changes (including dangerous) on the spacecraft radio electronic equipment. Receiving the flight data on spacecraft electronic equipment hardness. 3 To whom any correspondence should be addressed. Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by Ltd 1

The understanding of space radiation influence mechanisms on the spacecraft electronic equipment. Improvement of charge particles flux models. Forecasting of space weather characteristics. 2.2. The monitoring system structure and elements The monitoring system structure is presented in figure 1. The monitoring system includes space borne and ground segments. The main elements of the space borne segment are sensors which are based on the MNOS-dosimetry principle (metal-nitride-oxide-semiconductor transistor is used as a sensitive element). The sensors were calibrated at the certified stand GU-200 with 60 Co isotopes [3]. The ground segment includes several stations for the input, data processing and information output among other the on-board measurements At the moment there are 42 sensors on the board of 21 spacecrafts developed by JSC Information Satellite Systems which are functioning on the circular orbit ~ 20000 km (outer radiation belt). The engineering sample of the monitoring system ground segment was developed (website www.kosrad.ru). Figure 1. The monitoring system structure 3. Experimental and calculation results 3.1. Abrupt increase of dose rate event The analysis of the received data from October 2008 to September 2013 allows us to find out the periods with sharp increase of dose rate and definite value of such an increase. We also analysed space radiation characteristics data from other monitoring systems (such as GOES [4]) in dates of anomalous increase of dose rate. As you can see from the table 1, the increase of high-energy electron fluxes is observed on all dates and also geomagnetic storms are observed (Kp index is from 5) for all dates, while there are only two solar proton events which can contribute to the dose rate increase. 2

Table 1. The characteristics of space weather on the date of sharp increase of dose rate Date Dose rate before event (a.u. s -1 ) a Dose rate after event (a.u. s -1 ) a Dose rate increase (times) GOES proton fluxes >10 MeV (cm - 2 day -1 sr -1 ) [4] GOES electron fluxes > 2 MeV b (cm - 2 day -1 sr -1 ) [4] 05.04.2010 1.22 10-5 1.34 10-2 1098 1.6 10 4 5.4 10 9 03.08.2010 2.67 10-4 3.08 10-3 11 1.1 10 5 2.5 10 8 01.03.2011 1.29 10-4 1.02 10-3 79 1.4 10 4 7.8 10 8 02.05.2011 1.06 10-4 1.89 10-3 17 1.2 10 4 6.8 10 8 09.09.2011 1.26 10-4 2.18 10-3 17 4.2 10 4 3.2 10 8 23.01.2012 2.01 10-5 1.59 10-4 8 1.4 10 8 2.5 10 8 08.03.2012 3.61 10-4 2.35 10-3 7 2.0 10 8 5.9 10 8 08.10.2012 6.08 10-4 9.90 10-3 16 1.4 10 4 4.8 10 8 a a.u. are arbitrary units b Maximum value during the week 3.2. Computation algorithm of dose rate value from solar protons In this work we examined the largest solar particle event during the period of absorbed dose measurements (08.03.2012). The following algorithm was applied to assess the contribution of this flare in dose rate on the considered orbit of 20000 km. The integral spectrum of solar protons on the Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) was determined for the period from 5.03.2012 to 17.03.2012. For this purpose, the daily data of the solar proton fluxes for different energy ranges were used [4]. The differential spectrum of solar protons was calculated for this event. We considered the energy range from 1 to 100 MeV (protons with this energy give the main contribution in the absorbed dose). The differential spectrum, (in the MeV s -1 cm -2 ) was estimated for the range from 1 MeV to 10 MeV on the formula (1), for the range from 10 MeV to 100 MeV (2) and from 100 MeV (3): Where F 1, F 10, F 100 are the corresponding integral proton fluxes with energy more than 1MeV, more than 10 MeV and more than 100 MeV, respectively. We recount the differential spectrum of solar protons for the 20000 km orbit with the help of correction indices for the consideration of geomagnetic cuttoff rigidity (Rc). These indices are the ratio of solar protons fluxes for the 20000 km orbit and for GEO at same energies. Calculations were carried out using the COSRAD software [5]. The software is the main certified tool in Russia for space radiation environment calculation and is used for the establishing radiation hardness requirements for electronic equipment developed by the order of Roscosmos. Table values of Rc are used in the software for different altitudes and inclinations, which were precalculated for average geomagnetic activity (K index ~2-3). So changes of the Earth s geomagnetic field are not taken into account, and that is the limitation of our method. Figure 2 shows the correction indices. (1) (2) (3) 3

Figure 2. Correction indices for proton fluxes with certain energy from the 36000 km orbit to 20000 km orbit We calculated dose rate values behind the shielding of 1 g cm -2 (the value of the effective thickness shielding was determined taking the spacecraft s frame and MNOS transistor s case into account) during the period of solar proton flare with received spectrum by the «OMERE» software [6]. The calculation results are presented in table 2. Table 2. The calculation results of dose rate values Data GOES proton flux > Dose rate from GOES proton flux > 10 Contribution to the MeV, proton(cm 2 s sr) -1 100 MeV, solar protons, proton(cm 2 s sr) -1 a.u. s -1 total dose % 25.09.2001 12900 30 4.3 10-4 ~5 a 06.11.2001 31700 200 9.52 10-4 ~10 a 24.11.2001 18900 4 1.59 10-4 ~1 a 02.10.2001 2360 0,2 1.08 10-5 ~0,1 a 28.10.2003 29500 200 1.15 10-3 ~11 a 24.01.2012 6310 2 4.28 10-5 ~0,5 a (27 b ) 08.03.2012 6530 70 4.82 10-4 ~6 a (21 b ) a comparison with the maximum dose rate value for whole period of measurements (~10-2 a.u. s -1 according to Table 1) b comparison with the dose rate value measured for certain day The calculated value of dose rate from solar protons on the circular orbit 20000 km was 7.12 10-5 a.u. s -1 during the period from 5.03.2012 to 17.03.2012 (the maximum increase of solar proton flux during the whole period of dose measurement). If we compare the data of table 2 (right column) with the data of table 1, it may be concluded that during this flare the solar protons didn t give the considerable contribution to the dose rate increase. 4

4. Contribution to dose rate values of solar protons according to different models We also made the analysis of contribution to dose rate values of model events which are used in the software «OMERE» and in software «OSOT» [7] (Nymmik model [8]). Figure 3 shows the dose rate from solar protons reached the value of ~ 10-2 to 10-1 a.u. s -1 which is comparable to and even more than trapped electron contribution to the dose rate value. Figure 3. The dependence of dose rate value from solar protons vs. shielding thickness for different modeled events 5. Determination of critical solar proton flare class In terms of obtained data it is possible to determine the classes of solar proton events which can deposit important contribution in dose rate increase on the 20000 km orbit (more than 10 % of the maximum dose rate value 10-2 a.u. s -1 ; note that the average dose rate for the 20000 km orbit and shielding 1 g cm -2 is approximately equal to 10-3 a.u. s -1 ). These classes are S4 and S5 [10], but with the condition that the proton flux at energies above 100 MeV exceeds the value of 200 proton (cm 2 s sr) -1. Characteristics and a probability of these events are presented in the table 3. Solar proton event Table 3. The scale of solar proton events and their occurrence frequency The annual event occurrence probability Integral flux >=10 MeV a Observed between 1994-2014 [9] b All events S5 Extreme 100000 < 0.1 times during the year S4 Severe 10000 0.2 times during the year 0.3 times during the year a Average value of integral flux within 5 minutes, proton(cm 2 s sr) -1 b Upon condition proton flux >100 MeV more than 200 proton(cm 2 s sr) -1 The dose rate abrupt increase can cause the abnormal operation of on-board equipment because of the total ionizing dose effect in case an electronic component has accumulated dose which is close to its failure level. Also the stimulation of other effects (internal charging and etc.) is possible. It should be 5

noted that there are orbits (low-altitude, polar) where the protons influence exceed the electrons one. There are also orbits which are more shielded by the Earth s geomagnetic filed. 6. Conclusion The analysis of space-borne measurements of dose rate on the middle-earth orbit and proton and electrons fluxes from the GEO for 2008 2013 showed that the main contribution to the dose rate increase is given by trapped electrons. However, two proton events were seen (with class S3) which gave the contribution more than 20%. The direct in-flight measurements and calculations showed that it is necessary to consider the proton flux not only with the energy >10 MeV (which is used for event type classification), but with greater energy (first of all, 100 MeV) upon condition of flux more than 200 proton (cm 2 s sr) -1. In this case, solar protons give the contribution more than 10% in comparison with the maximum measured dose rate and future probable events will be able to contribute more than 50% in comparison with the same value. Consequently, the assurance of reliable operation of onboard equipment demands the control of the S4-class events, when the >100 MeV proton flux exceeds the value of 200 proton (cm 2 s sr) -1. Further, it is necessary to estimate the solar proton contribution to the dose rate on the other orbits (low-altitude orbit, polar orbit) on which dominates the influence of protons, not electrons. 7. References [1] J. Mazur The radiation environment outside and inside a spacecraft. IEEE NSREC 2002 Short Course, pp. II-1 II 69, 2002. [2] Koons H.C. et al. The Impact of the Space Environment on Space Systems // AEROSPACE REPORT NO.TR-99 (1670)-1, 1999. [3] V. S. Anashin, G. A. Protopopov, and Y. A. Milovanov, Monitoring of space radiation in Russian federal space agency, 12th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems, Sep. 2011. [4] http://www.swpc.noaa.gov [5] http://cosrad.sinp.msu.ru/manual.html [6] http://www.trad.fr/omere-software.html [7] Anashin Vasily, Protopopov Gregory, and Milovanov Yury, SEE testing for exposure of space ionizing radiation on radio-electronic equipment, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies - RAST2011, Jun. 2011. [8] R. A. Nymmik, Probabilistic model for fluences and peak fluxes of solar energetic particles, Radiation Measurements, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 287 296, Jun. 1999. [9] http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/sep/ [10] http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation 6