Fission product behaviour in the containment

Similar documents
Source term assessment with ASTEC and associated uncertainty analysis using SUNSET tool

AP1000 European 15. Accident Analyses Design Control Document

Analysis for Progression of Accident at Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station with THALES2 code

Estimation of accidental environmental release based on containment measurements

FP release behavior at Unit-2 estimated from CAMS readings on March 14 th and 15 th

11. Radioactive Waste Management AP1000 Design Control Document

AP1000 European 11. Radioactive Waste Management Design Control Document

SIMULATION OF LEAKING FUEL RODS

FILTRATION OF IODINE WITH A WET ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR

Detection of Xe135 at Nuclear Reactor of Unit 2, Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. November 4, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company

AP1000 European 15. Accident Analyses Design Control Document EVALUATION MODELS AND PARAMETERS FOR ANALYSIS OF RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ACCIDENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction. Schedule and Participation

Integrated Catalyst System for Removing Buildup-Gas in BWR Inert Containments During a Severe Accident

MAIN OUTCOMES OF FISSION PRODUCT BEHAVIOUR IN THE PHEBUS FPT3 TEST

Dynamic and Interactive Approach to Level 2 PRA Using Continuous Markov Process with Monte Carlo Method

MODELLING OF BASIC PHENOMENA OF AEROSOL AND FISSION PRODUCT BEHAVIOR IN LWR CONTAINMENTS WITH ANSYS CFX

Chemistry of Iodine and Aerosol Composition in the Primary Circuit of a Nuclear Power Plant

Nuclear Engineering and Design

Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. Original slides provided by Dr. Daniel Holland

MODELING AND ANALYSES OF POSTULATED UF 6 RELEASE ACCIDENTS IN GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT

TEPCO s Activities on the Investigation into Unsolved Issues in the Fukushima Daiichi NPS Accident

Numerical modelling of direct contact condensation of steam in BWR pressure suppression pool system

Correlation between neutrons detected outside the reactor building and fuel melting

GASEOUS AND VOLATILE FISSION PRODUCT RELEASE FROM MOLTEN SALT NUCLEAR FUEL

Jason T. Harris, Ph.D. Department of Nuclear Engineering and Health Physics

Regards, Chris Benson (Dr)

Progress of ASTEC validation on fission product release and transport in circuits and containment

Nuclear Theory - Course 227 FAILED FUEL MONITORING

Noble Gas Control Room Accident Filtration System for Severe Accident Conditions (N-CRAFT)

Short Introduction on MELCOR and ASTEC codes

Form 6 Chemistry Notes Section 1 1/7 Section 1 Atoms, Molecules and Stoichiometry

FUEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION THROUGH IODINE ACTIVITY MONITORING K.ANANTHARAMAN, RAJESH CHANDRA

ERMSAR Results and Progress of Fundamental Research on FP Chemistry. Japan Atomic Energy Agency. May16-18, 2017 Warsaw, Poland

+ 6S 2. O H + 2Cr S Which substance is the reducing agent in the reaction below? + 2H 2. Pb + PbO 2 SO 4

ASTEC participation in the International Standard Problem on KAEVER

CRITICALITY DETECTION METHOD BASED ON FP GAMMA RADIATION MEASUREMENT

SOME ASPECTS OF COOLANT CHEMISTRY SAFETY REGULATIONS AT RUSSIA S NPP WITH FAST REACTORS

Chem 481 Lecture Material 4/22/09

GCE AS and A Level. Physics A. AS exams 2009 onwards A2 exams 2010 onwards. Unit 5: Approved specimen question paper. Version 1.3

Radiochemistry in reactor

20.1 Xenon Production Xe-135 is produced directly in only 0.3% of all U-235 fissions. The following example is typical:

ESO201A: Thermodynamics

Research and Development of Gas and Aerosols Dispersion in the RB at EDF Nuclear Power Plants

Radioactive effluent releases from Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (1) - Gaseous effluent -

Executive Summary XII

Title: Assessment of activity inventories in Swedish LWRs at time of decommissioning

AECL. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD PROBLEM ISP-41 FU/1 PDF FOLLOW-UP EXERCISE (Phase 1): Containment Iodine Computer Code Exercise: Parametric Studies

REMOVAL OF VOLATILE IODINE FROM GAS BUBBLES RISING IN WATER POOLS: REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF POOL SCRUBBING CODES

Improved Consequence Modelling for Hypothetical Accidents in Fusion Power Plants

Homework 06. Nuclear

1. Introduction. 2. Model Description and Assumptions

Unit Five: Intermolecular Forces MC Question Practice April 14, 2017

Chapter 7 & 8 Control Rods Fission Product Poisons. Ryan Schow

Nuclear Data for Emergency Preparedness of Nuclear Power Plants Evaluation of Radioactivity Inventory in PWR using JENDL 3.3

RADIOACTIVE WASTE CHARACTERIZATION IN BELGIUM. Tractebel Ariane Avenue, 7 B-1200, Brussels, Belgium ABSTRACT

Chemical Families. Group 0 The Noble Gases

Polonium Behavior in eutectic Lead Bismuth Alloy

Elements, Mixtures and Compounds

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 6

Research Program on Water Chemistry of Supercritical Pressure Water under Radiation Field

ATOMIC THEORY, PERIODICITY, and NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY

Aerosols AP sizes AP types Sources Sinks Amount and lifetime Aerosol radiative effects. Aerosols. Trude Storelvmo Aerosols 1 / 21

Conservation The Law of Conservation of Matter states that matter cannot be created or destroyed in ordinary chemical reactions. This means that no

Chapter 12: Nuclear Reaction

Group 7: The Halogens

Concept Review. Section: How are Elements Organized? Skills Worksheet

ICONE DRAFT - EVALUATION OF THE CONSERVATISM OF NPP SAFETY ANALYSIS DOSE CALCULATIONS AS TYPICAL FOR LICENSING PURPOSES

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 34. Chem 4631

Chemistry I Practice Exam

ICSE Board Class IX Chemistry Paper 5 Solution

UNIT 10 RADIOACTIVITY AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY

GraspIT AQA GCSE Atomic Structure & the Periodic Table

Lesson 14: Reactivity Variations and Control

In-Vessel Retention Analysis for Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWR) under Severe Core Damage Accident (SCDA)

A. blue B. green C. red D. violet

Nuclear Engineering and Design

The Atmosphere. All of it. In one hour. Mikael Witte 10/27/2010

Origin of the Solar System

NEA/CSNI/R(99)5 English text only

2017 Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting September 10 (Sun) ~ 14 (Thu), 2017 Ramada Plaza Jeju Jeju Island, Korea

Modeling the release of radionuclides from irradiated LBE & Radionuclides in MEGAPIE Alexander Aerts & Jörg Neuhausen

Results and Progress of Fundamental Research on FP Chemistry

General A haloalkane is a compound in which one or more H atoms of an alkane are replaced by halogen atoms.

Chapter 15 REVIEW. Part 1. Part 2

Representative Questions Exam 3

12 Moderator And Moderator System

COMBUSTION OF FUEL 12:57:42

Section EXAM III Total Points = 150. November 15, Each student is responsible for following directions. Read this page carefully.

TOWARDS A SIMPLIFIED MEANS OF PREDICTING TIMES TO FAILURE OF HYDROCARBON-BEARING VESSELS AFFECTED BY HEAT

Chem 12 Exam 3. Basic Skills Section. 1. What is the chemical formula for aluminum nitrate?

Exam Accelerated Chemistry Study Sheet Chap12 Solids/Liquids/Intermolecular Forces

Radiation Damage Effects in Solids. Los Alamos National Laboratory. Materials Science & Technology Division

Chapter 8 - Technology of Accident Analysis

Chemistry 500: Chemistry in Modern Living. Topic 5: The Fires of Nuclear Fission. Atomic Structure, Nuclear Fission and Fusion, and Nuclear.

OFF-SITE AIR SAMPLING ANALYSIS AND NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR TEST

Nuclear Fission. Q for 238 U + n 239 U is 4.??? MeV. E A for 239 U 6.6 MeV MeV neutrons are needed.

RADIOACTIVITY. Nature of Radioactive Emissions

(D) The subtraction of from 4.8 giving the correct number of significant

Science 10 Chapter 4 Atomic Theory Explains the Formation of Compounds

In the investigation, a pressure on the order of 10-6

Transcription:

VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND LTD Fission product behaviour in the containment Nuclear Science and Technology Symposium - NST2016 2-3 November, 2016 Marina Congress Center, Helsinki, Finland Anna Nieminen

Outline of the presentation 1. Introduction Motivation Source term to the containment Iodine chemistry in the containment 2. ASTEC analysis example on fission product behaviour in the Nordic BWR containment 3. Summary 14/11/2016 2

Outline of the presentation 1. Introduction Motivation Source term to the containment Iodine chemistry in the containment 2. ASTEC analysis example on fission product behaviour in the Nordic BWR containment 3. Summary 14/11/2016 3

Motivation: Fission product behaviour inside the containment has important role in defining the source term to the environment In severe accident scenarios with controlled pressure relief through Filtered Containment Venting (FCV) line, typically filters are able to retain: Almost all aerosol particles Only a small part of gaseous iodine Negligible part of organic iodides and even less noble gases àit is essential to be able to define the form of fission products à All relevant phenomena should be taken into account à Iodine chemistry in the containment considered extremely complex 14/11/2016 4

Source term to the containment: Fission product release Gaseous fission products that are formed in the fuel will diffuse to gas gap between the fuel pellet and cladding (~ 5 % of the inventory) Diffusion rate increases when the fuel temperature increases Different fission products have different diffusion rates Gas gap inventory will be released instantaneously when the cladding fails Practically all noble gases (Xe, Kr), caesium (Cs) and iodine (I) will be released during the in-vessel phase Releasing Cs will react promptly with I forming CsI à In Phébus experiments with silver-indium-cadmium control rods CdI 2 was more common form Typically more Cs is released than I à Traditionally it has been assumed that excess Cs will form CsOH à Phébus experiments did show that Cs will more probably react with molybdenum forming Cs 2 MoO 4 CsI, CdI 2, CsOH and Cs 2 MoO 4 will agglomerate as aerosol particles 14/11/2016 5 Osa 16: Luento 16.3, Anna Nieminen, Ilona Lindholm, VTT, 11.2.2015

Source term to the containment: Transportation of fission products Fission product aerosols Transportation to primary circuit with steam or gas flows Deposition of particles onto primary circuit structures o Sedimentation: suspended particles settle out from the fluid by gravitation o Impaction: suspended particles settle out from the fluid by momentum o Diffusiophoresis: motion of dispersed particles in a fluid induced by a diffusion gradient o Thermophoresis: motion of dispersed particles in a fluid induced by a temperature gradient May re-vaporise if the structures become heated Noble gases remain in gas phase as well as part of iodine (5 %) 14/11/2016 6 Osa 16: Luento 16.3, Anna Nieminen, Ilona Lindholm, VTT, 11.2.2015

Principles of iodine behaviour: Liquid phase chemistry The most of the metal iodides are soluble and will be dissolved to sump water à iodide ions à I 2 due radiative and thermal effects The formation of I 2 depends extensively on ph level of the sump If ph > 7 the formation of I 2 is considered to be very low o NUREG-1465: less than 1 % of the dissolved iodine will be converted to elemental iodine Other source for volatile iodine in the sump is the formation of organic iodine compounds Organic radicals in the sump water originate for example from paints Silver will react with dissolved iodine species to form for example insoluble silver iodide (AgI) This will limit the formation volatile I 2 regardless of the sump ph 14/11/2016 7

Principles of iodine behaviour: Gas phase chemistry Volatile iodine will be absorbed and desorbed from surfaces in the containment A painted surface is a sink for I 2 and a source for volatile organic iodine o Radiation induces fast radiochemical reactions between iodine and the paints àthis phenomenon was observed in the Phébus-FP experiments by a formation of small steady-state concentration of iodine not dependent from pool ph Also the air radiolysis products react with I 2 to form primarily non-volatile species 14/11/2016 8

Outline of the presentation 1. Introduction Motivation Source term to the containment Iodine chemistry in the containment 2. ASTEC analysis example on fission product behaviour in the Nordic BWR containment 3. Summary 14/11/2016 9

ASTEC (Accident Source Term Evaluation Code) ASTEC is an integral code for simulating the entire severe accident sequence from the initiating event to the release of radioactive elements out of the containment Jointly developed by IRSN and GRS since 1996 Progressive and continuous evolution towards a state-of-theart tool for source term calculations 14/11/2016 10

ASTEC input = water, steam, H 2 = Xe, Kr = I,Br = Cs,Rb Venting begins when P drywell = 5 bar Leak size dependent on P drywell Will open if P wetwell > P drywell more than 0.01 bar, size dependent on dp Begins at 1800 s from scram 14/11/2016 11

Source term to the containment based on NUREG-1465 report 1) Noble gases Xe Kr 2) Halogens I Br Total mass [kg] 0.753 2.266 14.656 0.001 Gap release Early In-vessel release 5 % 95 % 5 % 25 % 3) Alkali metals Cs 159.211 Rb 0.001 5 % 20 % Timing of the release: 20 min 50 min 50 min 2 h 20 min 14/11/2016 12

Pressure in the containment Pressure increases rapidly in the containment after the pipe break and stabilizes Controlled with blowdown pipes Increase again when the fission product release to the containment begins at 20 min Around the same time hydrogen production starts The containment rupture disk venting begins at around 3 h 48 min decreasing the pressure effectively The peak at 4 h 4 min is caused by a steam burst from the primary circuit caused by a small amount of debris slumping to the lower plenum 14/11/2016 13

Temperature in the containment Decaying fission products heat the containment atmosphere When the fission product input ends, the decay heat produced in the containment is 2.38 MW The total decay heat should be around 25 MW at that time P th = 2 500 MW Nearly 10 % of the total decay heat is produced in the containment after 2 h 20 min 14/11/2016 14

Produced dose rates Gas phase Gas phase dose rate maximum occurs before all fission products enter to the containment (short lived nuclides) Dose rates on walls higher than dose rates on gas phase due to the amount of deposited aerosols For cavity the change is more notable The temperature is lower and therefore there is assumed to be less gaseous fission products compared to aerosols More deposited aerosols per wall area On walls 14/11/2016 15

Gaseous fission products Drywell Cavity Wetwell CsOH present also in gaseous form during temperature peaks in drywell To the wetwell remains a nearly constant inventory of noble gases Practically no pressure difference between the compartments Gaseous FPs from drywell and cavity are directed to the venturi scrubber Cavity-drywell flow path: 1.9 m 2 Drywell-wetwell leak: 0.01m 2 14/11/2016 16

Aerosols in the atmosphere Drywell Cavity Wetwell On average, more fission products are present as aerosols than in gaseous form 14/11/2016 17

Deposited aerosols Drywell Cavity Wetwell Deposition mostly occurred before containment venting begun (3h 48min) 49 % deposited by thermophoresis, 11 % by settling and 40 % by diffusiophoresis In the wetwell there is no deposition of aerosols Assumed to be a result of relatively low temperature and condensation of water on walls 14/11/2016 18

Fission products in sump Wetwell Cavity In total 97.2 % of the fission products were retained in the containment Most of them were dissolved to water (at 6h): 85 % of Cs 86 % of I 93 % of Kr and Xe 14/11/2016 19

Iodine on paint Mass of organic iodides remained very small in the analysis. The maximum value of CH 3 I registered was in the drywell gaseous phase: 0.6 g Wetwell pool walls were assumed to have steel surface Organic iodine is destroyed by the gamma radiation which could explain partly the relatively small amount of CH 3 I 14/11/2016 20

Outline of the presentation 1. Introduction Motivation Source term to the containment Iodine chemistry in the containment 2. ASTEC analysis example on fission product behaviour in the Nordic BWR containment 3. Summary 14/11/2016 21

Summary àwhen considering the possible source term to the environment, gaseous fission products are challenging In the analysed scenario: More fission products were present as aerosols than in gaseous form In addition to noble gases only CsOH present in gaseous form during temperature peaks 97.2 % of the fission products were retained in the containment Most of deposition occurred already before controlled containment pressure relief The mass of noble gases in water surprisingly high Mass of organic iodides remained very small Destroyed by the γ-radiation Painted wall area defined too small Mass of gaseous iodine remained also very small despite water ph was 5 Relatively small temperatures 14/11/2016 22

TECHNOLOGY FOR BUSINESS