THE STUDY OF NEUTRINO-NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS USING A MONTE CARLO EVENT GENERATOR

Similar documents
NEUTRINO ENERGY RECONSTRUCTION IN NEUTRINO-NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS

PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF NEUTRINO INTERACTIONS STUDY USING GENIE EVENT GENERATOR *

Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions and Oscillations

Charged Current Quasielastic Analysis from MINERνA

Tina Leitner Oliver Buß, Ulrich Mosel und Luis Alvarez-Ruso

The Short Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab

Why understanding neutrino interactions is important for oscillation physics

Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions. Ulrich Mosel

Simulations of the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment for the Sieroszowice Underground Laboratory (SUNLAB)

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Nuclear effects in neutrino scattering

Neutrino Cross Sections and Scattering Physics

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 7 Sep 2009

Constraining the T2K Neutrino Flux Prediction with 2009 NA61/SHINE Replica-Target Data arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Apr 2018

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

Quasi-Elastic Scattering in MINERvA

Neutrino cross sections for future oscillation experiments

Hadronization model. Teppei Katori Queen Mary University of London CETUP neutrino interaction workshop, Rapid City, SD, USA, July 28, 2014

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 13 Sep 2010

Neutrino Event Tagging Based On Nucleon Energy Spectra

Neutrinos Induced Pion Production in MINERvA

HADRON PRODUCTION IN WROCŁAW NEUTRINO EVENT GENERATOR

Ulrich Mosel TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAAAA

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Nov 2009

Radiation background simulation and verification at the LHC: Examples from the ATLAS experiment and its upgrades

ω γ Neutral Current Single Photon Production (NCγ) Outline 1. Oscillation physics 2. NOMAD 3. T2K/MINERvA 4. MicroBooNE 5. MiniBooNE+ 6.

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

Neutrino Shadow Play Neutrino interactions for oscillation measurements

PoS(ICHEP2016)293. The LArIAT experiment and the charged pion total interaction cross section results on liquid argon. Animesh Chatterjee

ECT GENIE FSI overview. Trento 13 July, GENIE FSI strategy features comparisons looking to future

Neutrino interaction at K2K

Giant Liquid Argon Observatory for Proton Decay, Neutrino Astrophysics and CP-violation in the Lepton Sector (GLACIER)

Recent results from MINERvA

Neutrino interaction systematic errors in MINOS and NOvA

MINOS experiment at Fermilab

Nuclear aspects of neutrino energy reconstruction in current oscillation experiments

DIS/Hadronization. Jarek Nowak

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Simulation Studies Toward the Search for Neutron Antineutron Oscillation

Neutrino Energy Reconstruction Methods Using Electron Scattering Data. Afroditi Papadopoulou Pre-conference, EINN /29/17

Publications of Francesco Arneodo: journal articles

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

QE or not QE, that is the question

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 26 Jul 2011

NuSOnG Detector Resolution, Calibration, and Event Separation

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

NOE, a Neutrino Oscillation Experiment at Gran Sasso Laboratory

RUNNING NuWro. Cezary Juszczak. Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław pl. M. Borna 9, Wrocław, Poland

Light ion recoil detector

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 14 Jan 2016

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

Study of possible opportunities for leptonic CP violation and mass hierarchy at LNGS

Measurements of the lead-hydrocarbon cross section ratio for charged-current neutrino interactions

Charged Current Inclusive Scattering in MINERnA

GENIE models and global fits of neutrino scattering data

Neutrino Responses and the Long Baseline Program

Status and Perspectives for KM3NeT/ORCA

The ICARUS Project FRONTIERS IN CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS II. Vanderbilt University, March 5-10, Sergio Navas (ETH Zürich) " Atmospheric neutrinos

Observation of flavor swap process in supernova II neutrino spectra

Measurement of the Inclusive Neutrino Charged-Current Interaction Double Differential Cross Sections with the MINERνA Detector

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 1 Jul 2010

Neutrino Cross Sections for (Future) Oscillation Experiments. Pittsburgh Flux Workshop December 7, 2012 Deborah Harris Fermilab

Introduction. The Standard Model

On the measurements of neutrino energy spectra and nuclear effects in neutrino-nucleus interactions

Neutrino Physics at MiniBooNE

Sam Zeller Fermilab. PANIC 2011 July 26, 2011

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Latest results of OPERA

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

ICARUS T600 experiment: latest results and perspectives

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

Research Article Simulations of Muon Flux in Slanic Salt Mine

Sensitivity of the DUNE Experiment to CP Violation. Lisa Whitehead Koerner University of Houston for the DUNE Collaboration

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

Bose-Einstein correlations in hadron-pairs from lepto-production on nuclei ranging from hydrogen to xenon

Measurements of the elastic, inelastic and total cross sections in pp collisions with ATLAS subdetectors

Status of Neutrino Cross Sections

Code inter-comparison and benchmark for muon fluence and absorbed dose induced by an 18 GeV electron beam after massive iron shielding

Tau-neutrino production study at CERN SPS: Novel approach by the DsTau experiment

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

FINAL-STATE INTERACTIONS IN QUASIELASTIC ELECTRON AND NEUTRINO-NUCLEUS SCATTERING: THE RELATIVISTIC GREEN S FUNCTION MODEL

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

A High Resolution Neutrino Experiment in a Magnetic Field for Project-X at Fermilab

PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. By: Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University August 5, 2011

Tau-neutrino production study in 400 GeV proton interactions

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 14 Jan 2019

Charged current single pion to quasi-elastic cross section ratio in MiniBooNE. Steven Linden PAVI09 25 June 2009

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

Neutrino Oscillations with a Next Generation Liquid Argon TPC Detector in Kamioka or Korea Along the J-PARC Neutrino Beam

Many-Body Theory of the Electroweak Nuclear Response

Meson Exchange Current (MEC) model in Neutrino Interaction Generator

The Study of ν-nucleus Scattering Physics Interplay of Cross sections and Nuclear Effects

Oklahoma State University. Solar Neutrinos and their Detection Techniques. S.A.Saad. Department of Physics

Particle Production Measurements at Fermilab

Transcription:

U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A, Vol. 74, Iss. 2, 2012 ISSN 1223-7027 THE STUDY OF NEUTRINO-NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS USING A MONTE CARLO EVENT GENERATOR Daniela CHESNEANU 1,, Alexandru JIPA 2, Ionel LAZANU 3 In cadrul unui experiment cu neutrini din fascicol se determina compozitia fascicolului de neutrini la o distanta cat mai mica de sursa acestuia si inainte de a avea loc fenomenul de oscilatie a neutrinilor pentru a putea controla fondul reprezentat de contaminarea fascicolului de neutrini. Analiza a fost realizata folosind un generator de evenimente, o unealta suplimentara, pentru a studia interactiile neutrinilor si pentru a simula raspunsul detectorului. In aceasta lucrare prezentam o metoda prin care poate fi determinat numarul de neutrini ce pot interactiona in volumul sensibil al unui detector situat la distanta mica de originea fascicolului de neutrini in cadrul unui experiment cu neutrini din fascicol. Acest studiu este necesar pentru a imbunatati potentialul de descoperire al detectorilor plasati in laboratoare subterane cu scopul de a determina proprietatile neutrinilor. In a long baseline neutrino experiment we have to measure beam neutrinos before oscillations can occur, at the close proximity of the beam source, to control backgrounds, like beam contamination. The analysis was realized using a neutrino generator which is a supplementary tool used to study neutrino interactions and to simulate the detector response. In this paper, we present a method to determine and analyze the number of neutrinos that can interact in a fiducial volume of a near detector from a neutrino beam experiment. The present study is useful for improving underground detectors discovery potential for determining the neutrino properties. Keywords: neutrino physics, neutrino event generator, GENIE, neutrino flux, detector geometry. 1. Introduction The study of neutrino interactions with nuclei is an active field of investigation and crucial to any type of long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment. Study of neutrino nucleus reactions in the few GeV energy region is complicated and requires many intermediate steps, such as a description of the nuclear model, understanding the neutrino nucleon cross sections, modeling of hadronization, as well as the modeling of intranuclear hadron transport and other 1 Phys.,Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering and Drd., Dept.of Atomic and Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Physics,University of Bucharest, Romania, chesneanu@ifin.nipne.ro 2 Prof.,Dept.of Atomic and Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Physics,University of Bucharest, Romania 3 Prof.,Dept.of Atomic and Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Physics,University of Bucharest, Romania

162 Daniela Chesneanu, Alexandru Jipa, Ionel Lazanu secondary interactions. All this steps would be solved if GEANT [1] had a validated neutrino interaction package. Because this tool kit can not describe the passage of neutrino through matter there are a number of Monte Carlo (MC) generators and numerical packages dedicated to description of neutrino interactions: GENIE [2], GiBUU [3], FLUKA [4], NEUT [5], NuWro [6] and Nuance [7]. Simulation in particle physics is a computer-aided method of modeling particle interactions with an aim to predict results of experiment. Simulations are used to evaluate the feasibility and physics reach of proposed experiments, optimize the detector design, analyze the collected data samples and evaluate systematic errors. LAGUNA [8] is a collaborative project whose principal goal is to assess the feasibility of a new pan-european research infrastructure able to host the next generation, very large volume, deep underground neutrino observatory. LAGUNA is a long baseline experiment aimed at measuring neutrino oscillation phenomenon using artificial neutrino beam. This means that neutrinos are produced at a certain location and shot towards a detector that is sufficiently far from the neutrino source to observe oscillation effects at their maximum. However, to control backgrounds, like beam contamination, one also has to measure beam neutrinos before oscillations can occur, at the close proximity of the beam source. This is a role of a second detector. Those two detectors are called, correspondingly, far and near. In our geometrical setup, Glacier plays a role of a near detector. The Glacier detector is the foreseen extrapolation up to 100 kton of the liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (TPC) technique. The liquid Argon TPC is a new and challenging technology and is the fruit of many years of R&D effort conducted by the ICARUS Collaboration [9]. One of the seven potential underground sites in Europe to install the LAGUNA detectors is Unirea salt mine, Slănic-Prahova (Romania), where there is located an underground laboratory with ultra low radiation background [10]. The proposed detector for this location is Glacier. In this paper we studied neutrino interactions with 40 Ar nuclei using a simple detector geometry for Glacier and a neutrino flux that can be sent from CERN to Unirea salt mine. 2. Physics processes and their simulation A precise estimate of all processes relevant for neutrino interactions with nuclei is needed. In our analysis of a few GeV energy range, neutrino interactions arise from a variety of sources. The main processes are: quasi-elastic (QE), resonant single-pion production processes (RES) and deep inelastic scattering

The study of neutrino-nucleus interactions using a Monte Carlo event generator 163 (DIS) interactions. The DIS processes are predominantly at these energies and fully dominate at higher neutrino energies. All these interactions can be classified into two groups charged current (CC) or neutral current (NC) depending, respectively, on whether a W ± or Z 0 boson is exchanged. NC interactions are inherently harder to detect than CC interactions because there is no charged lepton that can be seen in the detector. Therefore understanding CC neutrino nucleus interactions in the few GeV energy region is very important for many current and future neutrino experiments. In this paper we used GENIE that is an advanced and freely available neutrino MC generator designed by Dr. Costas Andreopoulos at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, for the purpose of the MINOS Collaboration [11], using object-oriented methodologies. It simulates neutrino interactions, for all neutrino flavors and all nuclear targets, over a large energy range from a few MeV to several hundred GeV. The technical details regarding physical models used in the program can be found in Ref. [2]. GENIE is a widely used tool, which has already been adopted by the majority of neutrino experiments, including those using the JPARC [12] and NuMI [11] neutrino beam lines. While existing neutrino MC generators simply simulate neutrino interactions and may include the ability to use some form of user-defined neutrino flux, GENIE can analyze detector geometries written in ROOT [13] or GEANT and can also interface with GEANT in order to feed the generated events into MC detector. The GENIE 2.6.0 version was installed on a LINUX distribution that required more external packages to enable certain specialized features: ROOT, LHAPDF [14], PYTHIA6 [15] and other C++ libraries. The user is allowed to choose target nucleus that is important, because final state interactions (FSI) are strongly dependent on number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. A primary state is defined as the topology of particles produced by the primary neutrino interaction and the final state is defined as the topology of the particles after any secondary interactions, such as intranuclear rescattering, that have taken place. We generated 100,000 events simulating υ e interactions on 40 Ar nuclei in the energy range (0-5 GeV). The considered neutrino flux can be sent from CERN to Unirea salt mine. In the first phase we generated the neutrino flux specifying the weight, the pdg code, the 4-momentum and 4-position. The neutrino flux is a cylindrical one of arbitrary 3-D beam direction and radius described by a constant function. We set the beam direction along the x axis (1, 0, 0) and the radius of the flux generation surface at R T =5 m. To fully specify the position of the flux generation surface we set the beam spot 3-vector at (100, 0, 0) which means that we will propagate the neutrino over the 100 m distance between the beam spot and the detector location (Fig.1).

164 Daniela Chesneanu, Alexandru Jipa, Ionel Lazanu The next step was to combine the flux with the detector geometry (Fig.2), written in ROOT, and generate events. The detector geometry is a simple model of a tube filled with liquid Argon, including all the parts of the detector densities and material composition in terms of chemical elements. GENIE will take the neutrino through the geometry and calculate the corresponding interaction probability for each target. GENIE can decide where and on which nucleus a given neutrino interacts. If it will interact, the event kinematics will be generated. Fig. 1 Geometrical setup for the υn simulations [16] (a) (b) Fig. 2 The neutrino flux and the detector geometry before (a) and after interaction (b). 3. Results All the following results were obtained using events generated with the neutrino flux and the detector geometry described in the previous section. In Fig. 3 we show the effect of convolving the neutrino energy spectrum with the interaction cross-section, obtaining the number of neutrinos that interact in the liquid Argon detector volume. On the left side of the figure is the energy spectrum

The study of neutrino-nucleus interactions using a Monte Carlo event generator 165 of all neutrinos in the beam, and on the right side is the energy spectrum of neutrinos that interact in the detector. As a consequence of the cross-section being smaller for low energy neutrinos the mean of the two histograms has shifted by an amount from around 2.5 GeV to 3.2 GeV. (a) (b) Fig. 3 (a) The energy spectrum of all neutrinos from the beam; (b) the energy spectrum of neutrinos that interact in the detector (CC interactions). Fig. 4 (a) shows the energy of neutrinos that interact in the detector for all physics processes. Fig. 4 (b-d) show the energy of neutrinos that interact in the detector for three most significant production channels QE, RES and DIS. For each of the channels described above, neutrino interacts with a nucleon bound in the nucleus if interactions on nuclei (like argon) have to be taken into account. An important role is also played by interactions between hadronic products of a primary reaction of neutrino with a nucleon and other nucleons in the nucleus. From these figures, we observe that DIS interactions are dominant. In the considered energy range this type of neutrino interactions are more probably at higher energy. For this three significant production channels CC neutrino interactions represent almost 75% of all neutrino interactions and this is very important, since they usually have only one observable product (lepton) and allow reconstruction of incoming neutrino energy. Table 1 contains the interaction probabilities in different channel simulated for our analysis. For these calculations we used the cross section spline files for all modeled processes for υ e scattered of nuclear target 40 Ar. CCDIS are the most probable processes in the considered energy range.

166 Daniela Chesneanu, Alexandru Jipa, Ionel Lazanu (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 4 Number of interactions in the detector geometry using a constant neutrino flux as a function of neutrino energy: (a) all physics processes; (b) QE, (c) RES and (d) DIS: red CC interactions, blue NC interactions, black CC+NC interactions. Table 1 Relative interaction probabilities of the neutrinos in the detector geometry CC [%] NC [%] All [%] QE 18 6 24 RES 23 8 31 DIS 33 11 44 Other 1 0 1 All 75 25 100 4. Conclusions In order to study neutrino-nucleus interactions in the few GeV energy region we considered a constant neutrino flux that was passed through a near detector geometry. We used GENIE Monte Carlo event generator both to study

The study of neutrino-nucleus interactions using a Monte Carlo event generator 167 neutrino interactions and to feed the generated events into the Monte Carlo simulated detector. In the studied energy range deep inelastic scattering interactions are predominantly and fully dominate at higher neutrino energies. The present study is useful for improving underground detectors discovery potential for determining the neutrino properties. R E F E R E N C E S [1] S. Agostinelli et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods A 506, 2003, pp. 250-303 [2] C. Andreopoulos et al, Nucl. Instrum.Meth. A614, 2010, pp. 87-104 [3] T. Leitner, L. Alvarez-Ruso and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 73, 065502 (2006), [arxiv:nucl th/0601103], GiBUU web page: http://gibuu.physik.uni-iessen.de/gibuu/ [4] G. Battistoni et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 896, 2007, pp. 31 A. Fasso, A. Ferrari, J. Ranft, and P.R. Sala, CERN-2005-10 (2005), INFN/TC 05/11, SLAC-R-773. FLUKA web page: http://www.fluka.org/ [5] Y. Hayato, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 112, 2002, pp. 171 [6] NuWro web page: http://borg.ift.uni.wroc.pl/websvn/ [7] D. Casper, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 112, 2002, pp. 161, [arxiv:hep-ph/0208030]. [8] A. Rubbia, Acta Physica Polonica B 41, 2010, pp. 1727-1732 [9] M. Amerio et al.(icarus Collaboration), Nucl. Inst. Meth., A527, 2004, pp. 329-410 [10] R.M.Margineanu et al., J. of lab. Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, vol.50, 2007, pp. 494. [11] http://www-numi.fnal.gov/index.html [12] http://j-parc.jp/index-e.html [13] R. Brun, F. Rademakers, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A389, 1997, pp. 81 86. [14] http://hepforge.cedar.ac.uk/lhapdf/ ; hep-ph/0508110 [15] Pythia 6.400 manual, JHEP 05, 2006, 026 [16] C. Andreopoulos et al, The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator. PHYSICS & USER MANUAL, http://www.genie-mc.org/