The Concordance Genus of Knots

Similar documents
Seifert forms and concordance

Satellites and Concordance

Some examples related to knot sliceness

KNOT CONCORDANCE AND TORSION

Slice Knots. and the Concordance Group

3. Signatures Problem 27. Show that if K` and K differ by a crossing change, then σpk`q

TitleRational Witt classes of pretzel kn. Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 47(4)

SPINNING AND BRANCHED CYCLIC COVERS OF KNOTS. 1. Introduction

SOME EXAMPLES RELATED TO KNOT SLICENESS. A. Stoimenow

Lecture 17: The Alexander Module II

COBORDISM OF DISK KNOTS

Some distance functions in knot theory

Cosmetic crossings and genus-one knots

SIGNATURES OF COLORED LINKS WITH APPLICATION TO REAL ALGEBRAIC CURVES

Cosmetic crossing changes on knots

Cobordism of fibered knots and related topics

arxiv: v3 [math.gt] 14 Sep 2008

Twisted Alexander Polynomials Detect the Unknot

Whitney towers, gropes and Casson-Gordon style invariants of links

An obstruction to knots bounding Möbius bands in B 4

AN INJECTIVITY THEOREM FOR CASSON-GORDON TYPE REPRESENTATIONS RELATING TO THE CONCORDANCE OF KNOTS AND LINKS

Knots and surfaces. Michael Eisermann. Universität Stuttgart 3. Juni 2014

Betti numbers of abelian covers

STRUCTURE IN THE CLASSICAL KNOT CONCORDANCE GROUP. Tim D. Cochran, Kent E. Orr, Peter Teichner

NONCOMMUTATIVE LOCALIZATION IN ALGEBRA AND TOPOLOGY Andrew Ranicki (Edinburgh) aar. Heidelberg, 17th December, 2008

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 27 Dec 2018

MORE ON KHOVANOV HOMOLOGY

Knots, von Neumann Signatures, and Grope Cobordism

DEFINITE MANIFOLDS BOUNDED BY RATIONAL HOMOLOGY THREE SPHERES

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 2 Nov 1999

ANNIHILATING POLYNOMIALS, TRACE FORMS AND THE GALOIS NUMBER. Seán McGarraghy

OUTLINE AND REFERENCES FOR PROJECT: HASSE PRINCIPLE FOR RATIONAL FUNCTION FIELDS, AWS 2009

Local Moves and Gordian Complexes, II

Families of non-alternating knots

Qualifying Exams I, Jan where µ is the Lebesgue measure on [0,1]. In this problems, all functions are assumed to be in L 1 [0,1].

Math 210B: Algebra, Homework 4

CSIR - Algebra Problems

Number Theory/Representation Theory Notes Robbie Snellman ERD Spring 2011

GALOIS GROUPS AS PERMUTATION GROUPS

Field Theory Problems

ON SLICING INVARIANTS OF KNOTS

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

Concordance of certain 3-braids and Gauss diagrams

Isogeny invariance of the BSD conjecture

Algebra Qualifying Exam Solutions. Thomas Goller

arxiv: v3 [math.gt] 11 Apr 2018

THE FOUR GENUS OF A LINK, LEVINE-TRISTRAM SIGNATURES AND SATELLITES

A remark on the arithmetic invariant theory of hyperelliptic curves

Part II Galois Theory

Michel Boileau Profinite completion of groups and 3-manifolds III. Joint work with Stefan Friedl

L-Polynomials of Curves over Finite Fields

THE QUADRATIC FORM E 8 AND EXOTIC HOMOLOGY MANIFOLDS

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #24 12/03/2013

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017

Mirror Reflections on Braids and the Higher Homotopy Groups of the 2-sphere

Exercises on characteristic classes

From K3 Surfaces to Noncongruence Modular Forms. Explicit Methods for Modularity of K3 Surfaces and Other Higher Weight Motives ICERM October 19, 2015

ALEXANDER-LIN TWISTED POLYNOMIALS

HIGHER-ORDER LINKING FORMS FOR KNOTS

Cosmetic generalized crossing changes in knots

EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.

PRESERVING INVOLUTIONS

ETA INVARIANTS AS SLICENESS OBSTRUCTIONS AND THEIR RELATION TO CASSON-GORDON INVARIANTS

Signatures of links in rational homology spheres

Galois theory (Part II)( ) Example Sheet 1

ON LINKING SIGNATURE INVARIANTS OF SURFACE-KNOTS

Fibered knots in low and high dimensions

Math 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems

Graduate Preliminary Examination

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 5 Aug 2015

EXOTIC 4-MANIFOLDS OBTAINED BY AN INFINTE ORDER PLUG

EACAT7 at IISER, Mohali Homology of 4D universe for every 3-manifold

ON THE ORDERS OF AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS OF FINITE GROUPS

Non-smoothable Four-manifolds with Infinite Cyclic Fundamental Group

Linear and Bilinear Algebra (2WF04) Jan Draisma

SUMS OF VALUES OF A RATIONAL FUNCTION. x k i

The Kummer Pairing. Alexander J. Barrios Purdue University. 12 September 2013

Part II Galois Theory

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 12 Dec 2011

2 LEGENDRIAN KNOTS PROBLEM SESSION. (GEORGIA TOPOLOGY CONFERENCE, MAY 31, 2001.) behind the examples is the following: We are Whitehead doubling Legen

Riemann surfaces with extra automorphisms and endomorphism rings of their Jacobians

Notes on p-divisible Groups

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 355 (2003), Preprint version available at

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS

On the modular curve X 0 (23)

HASSE-MINKOWSKI THEOREM

Congruent Number Problem and Elliptic curves

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gt] 15 Dec 2005

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 16 Feb 2015

Kazuhiro Ichihara. Dehn Surgery. Nara University of Education

The Möbius function and the residue theorem

Covering Invariants and Cohopficity of 3-manifold Groups

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

K3 Surfaces and Lattice Theory

The Real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4)

DIMENSION 4: GETTING SOMETHING FROM NOTHING

HEEGAARD FLOER HOMOLOGY AND KNOT CONCORDANCE: A SURVEY OF RECENT ADVANCES. Stanislav Jabuka University of Nevada Reno, USA

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems

COSMETIC CROSSINGS AND SEIFERT MATRICES

Knot concordance, Whitney towers and L 2 -signatures arxiv:math/ v2 [math.gt] 9 Feb 2004

Transcription:

The Concordance Genus of Knots Finding the least genus of a knot within a concordance class Chuck Livingston Brandeis University June, 2008

Basics. Concordance genus. Given K S 3, what is the minimal genus of a knot concordant to K? g 3 (K) = 3 genus. g 4 (K) = 4 genus. g c (K) = concordance genus, the minimal genus of a knot concordant to K. Theorem. g 3 (K) g c (K) g 4 (K). If K is slice, g c (K) = g 4 (K) = 0. Proof.

History. Does g c (K) = g 4 (K)? (Gordon problem list, 1977. Answer: No; Casson, 1979.) For every N, there exists a knot with g c (K) g 4 (K) N. (Nakanishi, 1981.) Find concordance relations among pairs of low crossing number knots. (eg. Conway found many concordance relations among 10 crossing knots, 1973.) Computations of g c for low-crossing number knots (c 10) with three exceptions: 8 18,9 40,10 82. (2001) Determination of g c for 8 18 and 9 40. (2008) 10 82? Continued identification of concordance relations among low crossing number knots.

Summary. Examples K = 6 2 : g 4 (K) = 1, g c (K) = 2. (Application of Alexander polynomials, Fox-Milnor theorem.) K = 6 2 # 6 2 : g 4 (K) = 2, g c (K) = 4. (Application of Fox-Milnor Theorem and Murasugi-Levine-Tristram signatures.) K = 9 40,8 18 : g 4 (K) = 1, g c (K) = 3. (Levine s rational algebraic concordance group of isometric structures.) K = 10 82 : g 4 (K) = 2, g 3 (K) = 4, g c (K) =?? (All integral algebraic concordance invariants consistent with g c (K) = 2.) K = 10 82 and other algebraically trivial cases. (Application of Details Casson-Gordon invariants.) Levine s invariants of knot cobordism are efficiently computable.

Example 1: K = 6 2. g 4 (K) = 1, g c (K) = 2. K (t) = 1 3t + 3t 2 3t 3 + t 4, (irreducible), g 3 (K) = 2: Deg( K (t)) 2g 3 (K). g 4 (K) 1: since K has unknotting number 1. g 4 (K) = 1: Fox-Milnor Theorem: If K is slice, K (t) = t k f (t)f (t 1 ) for some f and k: K (t) is a norm. If K is concordant to J, then K # J is slice and so K (t) J (t) = t k f (t)f (t 1 ) for some f. Thus, for any such J, deg J (t) 4, implying g 3 (J) 2. Hence, g c (K) = 2.

Generalization: g c (K) g 4 (K) arbitrarily large. Theorem For every N, there exists a K with unknot(k) = 1 and g c (K) > N. (Nakanishi, 1981.) n - n - 1 (3) (- 4 ) K (t) = 1 + t + - t 2 + + t 2n mod 2 Theorem (Nakanishi) For every Alexander polynomial (t) there is a unknotting number one knot K with K (t) = (t).

Example 2: K = 6 2 # 6 2. g 4 (K) = 2, g c (K) = 4. σ(k) = 4, where σ(k) is the Murasugi signature, sign(v K + V t K ). g 4 (K) = 2, since g 4 (K) σ(k)/2. K (t) = (1 3t + 3t 2 3t 3 + t 4 ) 2, so Fox-Milnor no longer applies. (There is a slice knot with this polynomial.) Since σ(k) 0, the Levine-Tristram signature function, σ K (ω) = signature((1 ω)v K + (1 ω)v t K ), ω S1, jumps at a root of K (t). (Note: σ K (1) = 0, σ K ( 1) = 4.) If K is concordant to J, then σ J (ω) must jump at the same root: (1 3t + 3t 2 3t 3 + t 4 ) divides J (t). (1 3t + 3t 2 3t 3 + t 4 ) 2 divides J (t). (Fox-Milnor) g3 (J) 4.

Example 3: K = 9 40. g c (K) = 3. The Alexander polynomial and signatures are sufficient to determine g c for all 10 crossing prime knots, except 8 18,9 40 and 10 82. g 3 (K) = 3, g 4 (K) = 1, σ(k) = 2, K (t) = (t 2 t + 1)(t 2 3t + 1) 2, Signatures do not help, since t 2 3t + 1 does not have roots on the unit circle. K 3 1 # 4 1 # 4 1 3 1? Need to work with finer invariants arising from Levine s Invariants of Knot Cobordism.

Levine s algebraic concordance group. G Z. The previous examples showed each K is not concordant to a knot J with a smaller Seifert matrix. Algebraic concordance group G Z of integer matrices V : 1. det(v V t ) = 1; 2. V is Witt trivial (or algebraically slice) if the bilinear form defined by V vanishes on a half-rank summand. (ie. V has a half-dimensional block of zeros.) 3. V 1 V 2 if V 1 V 2 is Witt trivial; In showing g c (6 2 ) = 2 we showed that the Seifert matrix for 6 2 does not have a 2 2 representative in G Z. In showing g c (6 2 # 6 2 ) = 4 we showed that the Seifert matrix for 6 2 # 6 2 does not have a 6 6 representative if G Z.

Levine s group of isometric structures. G Q. The Witt group of rational isometric structures: pairs (B,T) where B is a nonsingular, symmetric rational bilinear form and T is an isometry. An isometric structure is Witt trivial if B vanishes on a half-dimensional T invariant subspace (implying B = 0 W (Q), the Witt group of symmetric nonsingular rational bilinear forms). There is an injective homomorphism G Z G Q. V (V + V t,v 1 V t ) = (B,T) V (t) = det(v ) T (t), where T (t) = char. polynomial. One studies G Q by splitting it as G Q = δ GQ δ where Gδ Q is the subgroup of isometric structures with characteristic polynomial a power of the (symmetric) irreducible polynomial δ Q[t].

K = 9 40, g 3 (K) = 3, K = (t 2 t + 1)(t 2 3t + 1) 2. g c (K) = 3. (B,T) = (V + V t,v 1 V t ). G Q = δ G δ Q. (B K,T K ) = (B 1,T 1 ) t2 t+1 (B 2,T 2 ) t2 3t+1. Show B 2 is nontrivial. B 2 can be diagonalized over Q: 2 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 3 2 4 2 1 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5( 1) 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 5( 2) There is a homomorphism of Witt groups of bilinear forms: 5 : W (Q) W (Z/5) taking B 2 to [ ] 1 0 0 2 This is nontrivial in W (Z/5); thus (B 2,T 2 ) t2 3t+1 is nontrivial, and the t 2 3t + 1 factor is essential, implying g c (K) = 3.

K = 8 18, g 3 (K) = 3, σ(k) = 0, K = (t 2 t + 1) 2 (t 2 3t + 1). (B,T) = (V + V t,v 1 V t ). G Q = δ G δ Q. (B K,T K ) = (B 1,T 1 ) t2 t+1 (B 2,T 2 ) t2 3t+1. B 1 can be diagonalized over Q: 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3( 2) 0 0 0 0 3( 2) There is a homomorphism of Witt groups of bilinear forms: 3 : W (Q) W (Z/3) taking B 1 to [ ] 2 0 0 2 This is nontrivial in W (Z/3); thus (B 1,T 1 ) t2 t+1 is nontrivial, and the t 2 t + 1 factor is essential, implying g c (K) = 3.

Example 4: K = 10 82. g c (K) = 2, 3, 4? g 3 (K) = 4, g 4 (K) = 1, σ(k) = 2, K (t) = (t 2 t + 1) 2 (t 4 2t 3 + t 2 2t + 1) (B K,T K ) = (B 1,T 1 ) t2 t+1 (B 2,T 2 ) t4 2t 3 +t 2 2t+1. B 1 = 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 This bilinear form, B 1, is Witt trivial. Via results of Levine and Milnor, the isometric structure (B 1,T 1 ) is Witt trivial. Thus, K does have a rank 4 (genus 2) representative in G Q.

Ex. 4: K = 10 82 has algebraic concordance genus 2? Yes. K (t) = (t 4 2t 3 + t 2 2t + 1)(t 2 t + 1) 2 V K has a 4-d representative in G Q. How about in G Z? One can work backwards and find the genus 2 Seifert matrix representative for the algebraic concordance class of K. 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 4 This is not an integral Seifert matrix, but half of it is. Multiplication by 2 induces an involution of G Q. Careful application of Levine s complete set of p adic invariants shows this form is invariant under the involution. The only primes to check divide 2det(V )disc( V (t)) i.e. 2,7. Stoltzfus: Unraveling the Integral Knot Concordance Group.

Interlude: Casson-Gordon theory. For p and q primes, let M(K,p) be the p-fold branched cover of K and let H 1 (M(K,p)) q denote the q torsion in H 1 (M(K,p)). Theorem (C-G) If K is slice, there is a square root order subgroup H H 1 (M(K,p)) q, such that for every χ : H 1 (M(K,p)) q Z q vanishing on H, τ χ (K) = 0. τ χ (K) W (Q(ζ q r)(t)) Z[ 1 q ]. Theorem (Kirk-L.) (Herald-Kirk-L.) The discriminant (determinant) of τ χ (K) is the computable order of the twisted homology group H 1 (S 3 K, {(Q(ζ q )[t,t 1 ]) p }) as a Q(ζ q )[t,t 1 ] module, for some twisted coefficient group. Disc(τ χ (K)) = K,χ (t) Q(ζ q )[t,t 1 ], the twisted polynomial. Theorem If K is slice, then for the appropriate χ, K,χ (t) = af (t)f (t 1 ) Q(ζ q r)[t,t 1 ]. r = 1 if q odd.

Ex. 4: 10 82, C-G theory. K (t) = (t 4 2t 3 + t 2 2t + 1)(t 2 t + 1) 2 If K is concordant to J with g 3 (J) = 3, then J (t) = (t 4 2t 3 + t 2 2t + 1)((a + 1)t a)(at (a + 1)). Considering 3 fold branched covers: H 1 (M(K,3)) 2 = Z/8 Z/8 H 1 (M(J,3)) 2 = Z/2 Z/2. Regardless of the metabolizer H H 1 (M(K# J,3)) 2, there is a nontrivial χ: H 1 (M(K# J,3)) 2 Z/2 which vanishes on H and on H 1 (M( J,3)) 2. For any nontrivial χ, K,χ (t) factors. For χ trivial on H 1 (M( J,3)), J,χ (t) = t 4 8t 3 + 10t 2 8t + 1. This does not factor in Q(ζ 4 )[t] but factors in Q(ζ 8 )[t]. Therefore, K # J is not ribbon and K is not ribbon concordant to a genus 3 knot. (Work in progress.)

Another application of C-G invariants. Theorem For all N there exists an unknotting number 1 (g 4 (K) = 1), algebraically slice knot K with g c (K) = N. Proof outline: If H 1 (M(K,2),Z/q) = (Z/q) 2N and K is concordant to a knot J of genus M < N then H 1 (M(K # J,2),Z/q) = (Z/q) 2N (Z/q) 2M, M M. For some metabolizer H K H 1 (M(K,2),Z/q) and some proper subgroup H 0 H K, the value of τ(k,χ) is constant on the cosets of H 0 in H. Construct examples by starting with simple genus N unknotting number 1 knot and repeatedly knotting the surface while preserving the unknotting number.

Primes and G Q Theorem (Levine): (Q,T) G Q is trivial if and only if it is trivial in G F for F = R and F = Q p for all p adic rational fields. Theorem In checking triviality for a class V K G Z, you can restrict to primes dividing 2det(V + V t )det(v )disc( T (t)). (For detecting order 4, 2 det(v + V t ) suffices, T. Morita.) If p does not divide det(v + V t ), then (V + V t ) represents a class in W(Z p ). If p does not divide det(v), then V 1 V t represents an isometry of B K over Z p. Thus, if p does not divide det(v)det(v + V t ), then (V + V t, V 1 V t ) G Zp. p : W(Q p ) W(Z/p) has kernel W(Z p ).

Primes and G Q Theorem In checking triviality for a class V K G Z, you can restrict to primes dividing 2det(V + V t )det(v )disc( T (t)). If p does not divide det(v )det(v + V t ) then (V + V t,v 1 V t ) G Zp. There is the Q p splitting: G Qp = δ G δ Q p. If M = (Q,T) G Zp and p does not divide disc( T (t)), then M splits in δ G δ Z p. disc( T (t)) = (α i α j ) 2, over all roots of T (t). Example: Z[t] <fg> = Z[t] f Z[t] g if Res(f,g) = (α i β j ) = 1.

Problems Identify smooth invariants that distinguish g c and g 4. In particular, find a knot K with K (t) = 1 and g 4 (K) g c (K). Examples showed 9 40 3 1 and 8 18 4 1. Is 10 82 9 42? In general, find all concordance relations among (pairs of) low-crossing number knots. Such relations give many examples of simple knots (eg. 9 40 # 3 1 ) which represent torsion in G Z. Are these of infinite order in the concordance group? Ribbon vs. slice questions: 10 82.