B. LAQUERRIÈRE AND N. PRIVAULT

Similar documents
Tyler Hofmeister. University of Calgary Mathematical and Computational Finance Laboratory

1. Stochastic Processes and filtrations

The concentration of a drug in blood. Exponential decay. Different realizations. Exponential decay with noise. dc(t) dt.

Supermodular ordering of Poisson arrays

Question 1. The correct answers are: (a) (2) (b) (1) (c) (2) (d) (3) (e) (2) (f) (1) (g) (2) (h) (1)

STEIN ESTIMATION FOR THE DRIFT OF GAUSSIAN PROCESSES USING THE MALLIAVIN CALCULUS

COVARIANCE IDENTITIES AND MIXING OF RANDOM TRANSFORMATIONS ON THE WIENER SPACE

Solution for Problem 7.1. We argue by contradiction. If the limit were not infinite, then since τ M (ω) is nondecreasing we would have

Variance-GGC asset price models and their sensitivity analysis

Functional Limit theorems for the quadratic variation of a continuous time random walk and for certain stochastic integrals

Properties of an infinite dimensional EDS system : the Muller s ratchet

The Wiener Itô Chaos Expansion

Density models for credit risk

Independence of some multiple Poisson stochastic integrals with variable-sign kernels

Optimum CUSUM Tests for Detecting Changes in Continuous Time Processes

On the martingales obtained by an extension due to Saisho, Tanemura and Yor of Pitman s theorem

I forgot to mention last time: in the Ito formula for two standard processes, putting

Nonlinear representation, backward SDEs, and application to the Principal-Agent problem

An Introduction to Malliavin calculus and its applications

Stochastic Integration and Continuous Time Models

On maximal inequalities for stable stochastic integrals

Some Terminology and Concepts that We will Use, But Not Emphasize (Section 6.2)

LAN property for ergodic jump-diffusion processes with discrete observations

Lecture 22 Girsanov s Theorem

Quantum stochastic calculus applied to path spaces over Lie groups

OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS TO STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL INCLUSIONS

The Azéma-Yor Embedding in Non-Singular Diffusions

Periodic solutions of a class of nonautonomous second order differential systems with. Daniel Paşca

Exercises in stochastic analysis

Logarithmic scaling of planar random walk s local times

THE MALLIAVIN CALCULUS FOR SDE WITH JUMPS AND THE PARTIALLY HYPOELLIPTIC PROBLEM

An essay on the general theory of stochastic processes

Stochastic Calculus (Lecture #3)

The Pedestrian s Guide to Local Time

ON MEHLER S FORMULA. Giovanni Peccati (Luxembourg University) Conférence Géométrie Stochastique Nantes April 7, 2016

Bayesian quickest detection problems for some diffusion processes

Large Deviations Principles for McKean-Vlasov SDEs, Skeletons, Supports and the law of iterated logarithm

MEASURE CONCENTRATION FOR COMPOUND POIS- SON DISTRIBUTIONS

Probability approximation by Clark-Ocone covariance representation

Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Main results 3 3. Proof of the main inequalities 7 4. Application to random dynamical systems 11 References 16

Lyapunov Exponents of Linear Stochastic Functional-Differential Equations. II. Examples and Case Studies

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

GARCH processes continuous counterparts (Part 2)

Weak solutions of mean-field stochastic differential equations

Self-normalized laws of the iterated logarithm

p 1 ( Y p dp) 1/p ( X p dp) 1 1 p

Exponential martingales: uniform integrability results and applications to point processes

Numerical methods for solving stochastic differential equations

Brownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3

Inverse Brascamp-Lieb inequalities along the Heat equation

MA8109 Stochastic Processes in Systems Theory Autumn 2013

MATH4210 Financial Mathematics ( ) Tutorial 7

Integration by parts formulas concerning maxima of some SDEs with applications to study on density functions

RATIO ERGODIC THEOREMS: FROM HOPF TO BIRKHOFF AND KINGMAN

Information and Credit Risk

Regularity of the density for the stochastic heat equation

THE LENT PARTICLE FORMULA

AN EXTREME-VALUE ANALYSIS OF THE LIL FOR BROWNIAN MOTION 1. INTRODUCTION

Applications of Ito s Formula

Lecture 21 Representations of Martingales

1 Brownian Local Time

arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 18 Jan 2019

Continuous Time Finance

Memory and hypoellipticity in neuronal models

Stochastic Differential Equations.

Conditional Full Support for Gaussian Processes with Stationary Increments

arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 11 Jan 2019

Optimal investment strategies for an index-linked insurance payment process with stochastic intensity

MFE6516 Stochastic Calculus for Finance

(2m)-TH MEAN BEHAVIOR OF SOLUTIONS OF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS UNDER PARAMETRIC PERTURBATIONS

1. Stochastic Process

Thomas Knispel Leibniz Universität Hannover

IF B AND f(b) ARE BROWNIAN MOTIONS, THEN f IS AFFINE

arxiv: v2 [math.pr] 22 Aug 2009

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

Non-Essential Uses of Probability in Analysis Part IV Efficient Markovian Couplings. Krzysztof Burdzy University of Washington

Wiener Measure and Brownian Motion

Regularity of the Optimal Exercise Boundary of American Options for Jump Diffusions

CIMPA SCHOOL, 2007 Jump Processes and Applications to Finance Monique Jeanblanc

A Short Introduction to Diffusion Processes and Ito Calculus

Reduced-load equivalence for queues with Gaussian input

Lecture 12: Diffusion Processes and Stochastic Differential Equations

Large time behavior of reaction-diffusion equations with Bessel generators

Brownian motion. Samy Tindel. Purdue University. Probability Theory 2 - MA 539

A Note on the Central Limit Theorem for a Class of Linear Systems 1

Mean-field SDE driven by a fractional BM. A related stochastic control problem

Lecture 2. We now introduce some fundamental tools in martingale theory, which are useful in controlling the fluctuation of martingales.

Uniformly Uniformly-ergodic Markov chains and BSDEs

Alignment processes on the sphere

n E(X t T n = lim X s Tn = X s

Poisson random measure: motivation

The Cameron-Martin-Girsanov (CMG) Theorem

Stochastic integration. P.J.C. Spreij

From loop clusters and random interlacements to the Gaussian free field

Asymptotics for posterior hazards

INVARIANCE TIMES. Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Modélisation d Évry and UMR CNRS Évry Cedex, France

MAXIMAL COUPLING OF EUCLIDEAN BROWNIAN MOTIONS

Some Aspects of Universal Portfolio

Jump-type Levy Processes

UNDAMPED HARMONIC OSCILLATOR DRIVEN BY ADDITIVE GAUSSIAN WHITE NOISE: A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Transcription:

DEVIAION INEQUALIIES FOR EXPONENIAL JUMP-DIFFUSION PROCESSES B. LAQUERRIÈRE AND N. PRIVAUL Abstract. In this note we obtain deviation inequalities for the law of exponential jump-diffusion processes at a fixed time. Our method relies on convex concentration inequalities obtained by forward/backward stochastic calculus. In the pure jump and pure diffusion cases it also improves on classical results obtained by direct application of Gaussian and Poisson bounds. 1. Introduction Deviation inequalities for random variables admitting a predictable representation have been obtained by several authors. When W t ) t R+ is a standard Brownian motion and η t ) t R+ an adapted process using the time change 1) t τt) := on Brownian motion yields the bound ) 2) P η t dw t x provided 3) Σ 2 := t η s 2 ds ) exp x2 2Σ 2 x > η t 2 dt <. On the other hand if Z t ) t R+ is a point process with random intensity λ t ) t R+ and U t ) t R+ is an adapted process we have the inequality ) P U t dz t λ t dt) x exp x 1 2β log + βλ )) 4) x x > provided U t β a.s. for some constant β > and Λ := U t 2 λ t dt < cf. [1] [5] when Z t ) t R+ is a Poisson process and [4] for the mixed point process-diffusion case. Note that although Z t ) t R+ becomes a standard Poisson process N t ) t R+ under the time change t t λ s ds when U t ) t R+ is non-constant the inequality 4) can not be recovered from a Poisson deviation bound in the same way as 2) is obtained from a Gaussian deviation bound. In this paper we consider linear stochastic differential equations of the form 5) ds t S t = σ t dw t + J t dz t λ t dt) 21 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 6F99; Secondary 39B62 6H5 6H1. ey words and phrases. Deviation inequalities exponential jump-diffusion processes concentration inequalities forward/backward stochastic calculus. 1

2 B. LAQUERRIÈRE AND N. PRIVAUL where W t ) t R+ is a standard Brownian motion Z t ) t R+ is a point process of stochastic) intensity λ t. Here the processes W t ) t R+ and Z t ) t R+ may not be independent but they are adapted to a same filtration F t ) t R+ and σ t ) t R+ J t ) t R+ are sufficiently integrable F t -adapted processes. Clearly the above deviation inequalities 2) and 4) require some boundedness on the integrand processes η t ) t R+ and U t ) t R+ and for this reason they do not apply directly to the solution S t ) t R+ of 5) since the processes η t ) t [ ] = σ t S t ) t [ ] and U t ) t [ ] = J t S t ) t [ ] are not in L Ω L 2 [ ])). his is consistent with the fact that when σ t is a deterministic function S has a log-normal distribution which is not compatible with a Gaussian tail. In this paper we derive several deviation inequalities for exponential jump-diffusion processes S t ) t R+ of the form 5). Our results rely on the following proposition cf. [2] Corollary 5.2 and heorem 1.1 below. Let St ) t R+ be the solution of ds t S t = σ t)dŵt + J t)d ˆN t λ t)dt) where Ŵt) t R+ is a standard Brownian motion ˆN t ) t R+ is a Poisson process of deterministic) intensity λ t) which are assumed to be mutually independent while σ t) and J t) are deterministic functions with J t) t R +. heorem 1.1. Assume that one of the following conditions is satisfied: i) 1 < J t J t) dp dt-a.e. and σ t σ t) J 2 t λ t J t) 2 λ t) dp dt a.e. ii) 1 < J t J t) dp dt-a.e. and σ t 2 + J 2 t λ t σ t) 2 + J t) 2 λ t) dp dt a.e. iii) J t J t) dp dt-a.e. J 2 t λ t J t) 2 λ t) hen we have dp dt-a.e. and σ t 2 + J 2 t λ t σ t) 2 + J t) 2 λ t) dp dt a.e. 6) E[φS t ) S = x] E[φS t ) S = x] x > t R + for all convex function φ such that φ is convex. Note that in the continuous case J = Relation 6) can be recovered by the Doob stopping time theorem and Jensen s inequality applied to the time change 1) since W t := t/2 + logs τ 1 t)/s ) is a standard Brownian motion with respect to a timechanged filtration F) t R+ and letting X t := S e W t t/2 t R + we have E[φS )] = E [ φ )] X τ ) [ [ = E φ E X σ s) 2 ds F ])] σs 2 ds [ [ ) ]] E E φ X σ s) 2 ds F σs 2 ds [ )] = E φ X σ s) 2 ds 7) = E[φS )]. However this time change argument does not apply to the jump-diffusion case and in addition in the pure jump case it cannot be used when J t ) t R+ is non-constant. We refer to [3] for deviation inequalities for exponential stable processes when the number of jumps is a.s. infinite.

DEVIAION INEQUALIIES FOR EXPONENIAL JUMP-DIFFUSION PROCESSES 3 2. Deviation bounds We begin with a result in the pure jump case i.e. when σ t = dp dt-a.e. and let gu) = 1 + u log u u u >. Let S t ) t R+ denote the solution of 5) with S = 1. heorem 2.1. Assume that σ t = dp dt-a.e. and that for some and let 1 < J t Λ t = t dp dt a.e. J s 2 λ s ds t R +. hen for any > and all x Λ ) β 1 + )2 1 we have Plog S x) exp Λ 2 g 1 + x ))) β Λ exp 1 x 2 β + Λ )) 2 β 1 log 1 + x ))) 8) β Λ where β = log1 + ). Proof. Let J t) = t R + λ t) = 1 2 J 2 t λ t t and denote by S t = e Λt/ 1 + ) N t t R+ the solution of 9) ds t S t = dn t λ t)dt) with S = 1 where N t ) t R+ is a Poisson process with deterministic intensity λ t)) t R+. Under the above hypotheses heorem 1.1 i) yields the inequality 1) y α PS y) E[S ) α ] = e αλ / E [ ) α ] 1 + ) N = e αλ / e Λ 1+) α 1)/ 2 for the convex function y y α with convex derivative α 2 hence Λ 11) Plog S x) exp 2 1 + )α 1) α Λ ) αx. he minimum in α in the above bound is obtained at α = 1 β log 1 + x )) β Λ which is greater than 2 if and only if 12) x Λ Hence for all x satisfying 12) we have Plog S x) exp = exp ) β 1 + )2 1. Λ 1 + )α 2 Λ 2 g β 1) α x + Λ 1 + x Λ ))) ))

4 B. LAQUERRIÈRE AND N. PRIVAUL and Relation 8) follows from the classical inequality 1 2 u log1 + u) g1 + u) u >. Note that an application of the classical Poisson bound 4) only yields Plog S x) = P = P provided ) log1 + J t )dz t J t λ t dt x log1 + J t )dz t λ t dt) x + ) P log1 + J t )dz t λ t dt) x exp x 2β log 1 + β x )) x > Λ J t and ) J t λ t dt log1 + J t )λ t dt log1 + J t ) 2 λ t dt Λ a.s. which is worse than 8) even in the deterministic case since 1 < /β as and Λ Λ. heorem 2.1 admits a generalization to the case of a continuous component when the jumps J t have constant sign. heorem 2.2. Assume that 1 < J t dp dt a.e. or J t dp dt a.e. for some > and assume that hen for all x Λ 13) 14) where β = log1 + ). Λ := ) β 1 + )2 1 Plog S x) exp exp 1 2 σt 2 + J 2 t λ t dt <. Λ x β + Λ 2 we have 2 g β β 1 1 + x ))) Λ )) log β 1 + x ))) Λ Proof. We repeat the proof of heorem 2.1 replacing the use of heorem 1.1 i) by heorem 1.1 ii) and heorem 1.1 iii) and by defining λ t) as λ t) = 1 2 σt 2 + J 2 t λ t t. Letting in 13) or 14) we obtain the following Gaussian deviation inequality in the negative jump case with a continuous component.

DEVIAION INEQUALIIES FOR EXPONENIAL JUMP-DIFFUSION PROCESSES 5 heorem 2.3. Assume that 1 < J t dp dt-a.e. and let Σ 2 = σt 2 + J 2 t λ t dt < >. hen we have 15) Plog S x) exp x + ) Σ2 /2)2 x 3Σ 2 /2. Proof. Although this result follows from heorem 2.2 by taking we show that it can also be obtained from heorem 1.1. Let σ t) 2 = σt 2 + Jt 2 λ t t t and denote by St = exp σ s)dw s 1 t ) σ s) 2 ds t R + the solution of 2 dst 16) St = σ t)dw t with initial condition S = 1. By the chebychev inequality and heorem 1.1 ii) applied for = for all positive nondecreasing convex functions φ : R R with convex derivative we have 2Σ 2 17) φy)ps y) E[φS )]. Applying this inequality to the convex function t y α for fixed α 2 we obtain hence y α PS y) E[S ) α ] = exp αα 1)Σ 2 /2 ) 18) PS e x ) exp αx + αα 1)Σ 2 /2 ) x α 2. he function α αx + αα 1)Σ 2 /2 attains its minimum over α 2 at α = 1 2 + x Σ 2 x 3Σ 2 /2 which yields 15). In the pure diffusion case with J = and σ t ) t R+ deterministic the bound 15) can be directly obtained from P log S x) = P exp σ t dw t 1 ) ) σ t 2 dt e x 2 = P exp W Σ 2 1 ) ) 2 Σ2 e x exp x + ) Σ2 19) /2)2 x >. 2Σ 2 On the other hand when J = and σ t ) t R+ is an adapted process the bound 2) only yields Plog S x) = P σ t dw t 1 ) σ t 2 dt x 2 ) P σ t dw t x 2) e x2 /2Σ 2 ) x >

6 B. LAQUERRIÈRE AND N. PRIVAUL which is worse than 15) and 19) by a factor expx/2+σ 2 /8). In this case the argument of heorem 2.3 can be based on 7) instead of using heorem 1.1. References [1] C. Ané and M. Ledoux. On logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for continuous time random walks on graphs. Probab. heory Related Fields 1164):573 62 2. [2] J.C. Breton and N. Privault. Convex comparison inequalities for exponential jump-diffusion processes. Communications on Stochastic Analysis 1:263 277 27. [3] S. Cohen and. Mikosch. ail behavior of random products and stochastic exponentials. Stochastic Process. Appl. 1183):333 345 28. [4] h. lein Y. Ma and N. Privault. Convex concentration inequalities via forward/backward stochastic calculus. Electron. J. Probab. 11:no. 2 27 pp. electronic) 26. [5] L. Wu. A new modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for Poisson point processes and several applications. Probab. heory Related Fields 1183):427 438 2. Laboratoire de Mathématiques Université de La Rochelle Avenue Michel Crépeau 1742 La Rochelle Cedex France. E-mail address: benjamin.laquerriere@univ-lr.fr Department of Mathematics City University of Hong ong at Chee Avenue owloon ong Hong ong. E-mail address: nprivaul@cityu.edu.hk