Module Contact: Dr Susan Long, ECO Copyright of the University of East Anglia Version 1

Similar documents
Question 1 carries a weight of 25%; question 2 carries 20%; question 3 carries 25%; and question 4 carries 30%.

Question 1 carries a weight of 25%; Question 2 carries 20%; Question 3 carries 20%; Question 4 carries 35%.

x i1 =1 for all i (the constant ).

Interval Estimation in the Classical Normal Linear Regression Model. 1. Introduction

a. (All your answers should be in the letter!

ECON 351* -- Note 23: Tests for Coefficient Differences: Examples Introduction. Sample data: A random sample of 534 paid employees.

DO NOT OPEN THE QUESTION PAPER UNTIL INSTRUCTED TO DO SO BY THE CHIEF INVIGILATOR. Introductory Econometrics 1 hour 30 minutes

Professor Chris Murray. Midterm Exam

ECONOMETRICS - FINAL EXAM, 3rd YEAR (GECO & GADE)

Lecture Notes for STATISTICAL METHODS FOR BUSINESS II BMGT 212. Chapters 14, 15 & 16. Professor Ahmadi, Ph.D. Department of Management

Statistics for Economics & Business

[The following data appear in Wooldridge Q2.3.] The table below contains the ACT score and college GPA for eight college students.

University of California at Berkeley Fall Introductory Applied Econometrics Final examination

Question 1 carries a weight of 25%; question 2 carries 25%; question 3 carries 20%; and question 4 carries 30%.

Lecture 4 Hypothesis Testing

Introduction to Dummy Variable Regressors. 1. An Example of Dummy Variable Regressors

Correlation and Regression. Correlation 9.1. Correlation. Chapter 9

ECONOMICS 351*-A Mid-Term Exam -- Fall Term 2000 Page 1 of 13 pages. QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON Department of Economics

Lecture 9: Linear regression: centering, hypothesis testing, multiple covariates, and confounding

Marginal Effects of Explanatory Variables: Constant or Variable? 1. Constant Marginal Effects of Explanatory Variables: A Starting Point

Lecture 9: Linear regression: centering, hypothesis testing, multiple covariates, and confounding

January Examinations 2015

Department of Quantitative Methods & Information Systems. Time Series and Their Components QMIS 320. Chapter 6

Tests of Single Linear Coefficient Restrictions: t-tests and F-tests. 1. Basic Rules. 2. Testing Single Linear Coefficient Restrictions

First Year Examination Department of Statistics, University of Florida

Statistics II Final Exam 26/6/18

Chapter 13: Multiple Regression

Lecture 6: Introduction to Linear Regression

Economics 130. Lecture 4 Simple Linear Regression Continued

) is violated, so that V( instead. That is, the variance changes for at least some observations.

Chapter 14 Simple Linear Regression

Interpreting Slope Coefficients in Multiple Linear Regression Models: An Example

Tests of Exclusion Restrictions on Regression Coefficients: Formulation and Interpretation

EXAMINATION. N0028N Econometrics. Luleå University of Technology. Date: (A1016) Time: Aid: Calculator and dictionary

Polynomial Regression Models

Midterm Examination. Regression and Forecasting Models

since [1-( 0+ 1x1i+ 2x2 i)] [ 0+ 1x1i+ assumed to be a reasonable approximation

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel/SPSS Chapter 14 Multiple Regression Models

1. Inference on Regression Parameters a. Finding Mean, s.d and covariance amongst estimates. 2. Confidence Intervals and Working Hotelling Bands

Basically, if you have a dummy dependent variable you will be estimating a probability.

Chapter 15 - Multiple Regression

Chapter 11: Simple Linear Regression and Correlation

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel/SPSS Chapter 13 The Simple Linear Regression Model and Correlation

NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY SEMESTER I EXAMINATION MTH352/MH3510 Regression Analysis

The SAS program I used to obtain the analyses for my answers is given below.

Chapter 5: Hypothesis Tests, Confidence Intervals & Gauss-Markov Result

Correlation and Regression

18. SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION III

Statistics for Business and Economics

Biostatistics 360 F&t Tests and Intervals in Regression 1

Linear Regression Analysis: Terminology and Notation

PhD/MA Econometrics Examination. January PART A (Answer any TWO from Part A)

Basic Business Statistics, 10/e

Now we relax this assumption and allow that the error variance depends on the independent variables, i.e., heteroskedasticity

Soc 3811 Basic Social Statistics Third Midterm Exam Spring 2010

Reminder: Nested models. Lecture 9: Interactions, Quadratic terms and Splines. Effect Modification. Model 1

Chapter 15 Student Lecture Notes 15-1

β0 + β1xi. You are interested in estimating the unknown parameters β

ISQS 6348 Final Open notes, no books. Points out of 100 in parentheses. Y 1 ε 2

See Book Chapter 11 2 nd Edition (Chapter 10 1 st Edition)

Outline. 9. Heteroskedasticity Cross Sectional Analysis. Homoskedastic Case

Chapter 8 Multivariate Regression Analysis

LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS. MODULE IX Lecture Multicollinearity

Testing for seasonal unit roots in heterogeneous panels

If we apply least squares to the transformed data we obtain. which yields the generalized least squares estimator of β, i.e.,

28. SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION III

STATISTICS QUESTIONS. Step by Step Solutions.

where I = (n x n) diagonal identity matrix with diagonal elements = 1 and off-diagonal elements = 0; and σ 2 e = variance of (Y X).

Diagnostics in Poisson Regression. Models - Residual Analysis

Continuous vs. Discrete Goods

β0 + β1xi. You are interested in estimating the unknown parameters β

Chapter 14: Logit and Probit Models for Categorical Response Variables

Department of Statistics University of Toronto STA305H1S / 1004 HS Design and Analysis of Experiments Term Test - Winter Solution

Exam. Econometrics - Exam 1

STAT 3008 Applied Regression Analysis

REGRESSION ANALYSIS II- MULTICOLLINEARITY

STAT 405 BIOSTATISTICS (Fall 2016) Handout 15 Introduction to Logistic Regression

Lecture 3 Stat102, Spring 2007

4.3 Poisson Regression

ANSWERS. Problem 1. and the moment generating function (mgf) by. defined for any real t. Use this to show that E( U) var( U)

Statistics MINITAB - Lab 2

Predictive Analytics : QM901.1x Prof U Dinesh Kumar, IIMB. All Rights Reserved, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Scatter Plot x

(c) Pongsa Pornchaiwiseskul, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University

2016 Wiley. Study Session 2: Ethical and Professional Standards Application

β0 + β1xi and want to estimate the unknown

Introduction to Regression

Learning Objectives for Chapter 11

Comparison of Regression Lines

CHAPTER 8. Exercise Solutions

Systems of Equations (SUR, GMM, and 3SLS)

Negative Binomial Regression

F8: Heteroscedasticity

Resource Allocation and Decision Analysis (ECON 8010) Spring 2014 Foundations of Regression Analysis

MODULE TWO, PART THREE: ENDOGENEITY, INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES AND TWO-STAGE LEAST SQUARES IN ECONOMIC EDUCATION RESEARCH USING STATA

A dummy variable equal to 1 if the nearby school is in regular session and 0 otherwise;

CHAPER 11: HETEROSCEDASTICITY: WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ERROR VARIANCE IS NONCONSTANT?

Econ107 Applied Econometrics Topic 3: Classical Model (Studenmund, Chapter 4)

Chapter 2 - The Simple Linear Regression Model S =0. e i is a random error. S β2 β. This is a minimization problem. Solution is a calculus exercise.

Econometrics: What's It All About, Alfie?

Transcription:

UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA School of Economcs Man Seres PG Examnaton 016-17 ECONOMETRIC METHODS ECO-7000A Tme allowed: hours Answer ALL FOUR Questons. Queston 1 carres a weght of 5%; Queston carres 0%; Queston 3 carres 0%; Queston 4 carres 35%. Marks awarded for ndvdual parts are shown n square brackets. A formula sheet, t-tables, F-tables, and chsquared tables, are attached to the examnaton paper. Notes are not permtted n ths examnaton. Do not turn over untl you are told to do so by the Invglator. ECO-7000A Module Contact: Dr Susan Long, ECO Copyrght of the Unversty of East Angla Verson 1

Page THIS PAGE IS DELIBERATELY LEFT BLANK

QUESTION 1 [5 Marks] Page 3 ALL WORKING MUST BE SHOWN IN YOUR ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION The followng table contans data on advertsng expendture (X) and profts (Y) for a sample of sx small frms. Both varables are measured n thousands of pounds. Frm X Y A 0 5 B 3 3 C 4 8 D 7 13 E 10 9 F 1 16 (a) Fnd OLS estmates, ˆ 1 and ˆ of the parameters of the model: Y X u 1, 6. [8] 1, (b) Interpret the two parameter estmates. [4] (c) Fnd the resduals. Whch of the sx frms has the hghest postve resdual assocated wth t? What can you conclude about ths frm? [3] (d) Fnd the estmated standard error, se ( ˆ ), of ˆ. Then conduct a test of the hypothess H0: = 0 aganst H1 : > 0. Interpret the test result. [7] (e) Brefly explan why we chose to conduct a one-taled test n (d) rather than a two-taled test. [3] TURN OVER

QUESTION [0 Marks] Page 4 Data was collected on 300 rental propertes n Norwch. All propertes are n one of the four postcodes NR1-NR4. The varables are: rent: beds: nr1: nr: nr3: nr4: rent n pounds per month number of bedrooms 1 f located n NR1 (South Central Norwch); 0 otherwse 1 f located n NR (West Central Norwch); 0 otherwse 1 f located n NR3 (North Central Norwch); 0 otherwse 1 f located n NR4 (South-West Norwch); 0 otherwse The followng STATA results are obtaned:. gen beds=beds^ * MODEL 1:. regress rent beds beds Source SS df MS Number of obs = 300 -------------+------------------------------ F(, 97) = 130.30 Model 101801.81 510900.905 Prob > F = 0.0000 Resdual 1164483.9 97 390.81917 R-squared = 0.4674 -------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.4638 Total 18685.1 99 7311.9903 Root MSE = 6.616 rent Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- beds 51.7737 7.54998 6.86 0.000 36.91681 66.6306 beds -3.601668 1.44989 -.49 0.014-6.453845 -.7494909 _cons 14.0019 8.058 6.66 0.000 198.07 9.7965 * MODEL :. regress rent beds beds nr-nr4 Source SS df MS Number of obs = 300 -------------+------------------------------ F( 5, 94) = 8.55 Model 1738915.49 5 347783.099 Prob > F = 0.0000 Resdual 447369.61 94 151.66534 R-squared = 0.7954 -------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.7919 Total 18685.1 99 7311.9903 Root MSE = 39.009 rent Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- beds 54.07607 4.750374 11.38 0.000 44.770 63.451 beds -3.568954.914577-3.90 0.000-5.36874-1.769635 nr 55.1306 7.168803 7.69 0.000 41.0195 69.393 nr3-58.4666 7.36588-8.08 0.000-7.7087-44.454 nr4 9.197 8.460637 3.44 0.001 1.47818 45.78036 _cons 03.6306 7.84335 7.95 0.000 189.945 17.9666

Page 5 (a) (b) (c) (d) What s the estmate of the ntercept parameter n model 1? What s the nterpretaton of ths estmate? [5] Explan the economc prncple(s) underlyng the ncluson of the varable beds n model 1. Does the assocated t-statstc confrm that these prncples are at work? [5] Explan why only three of the four locaton dummes have been ncluded n model. What would happen f you tred to nclude all four? [5] Carry out an F-test to test model 1 as a restrcted verson of model, n order to test the mportance of locaton n rent determnaton. Interpret your result. [5] TURN OVER

QUESTION 3 [0 marks] Page 6 We have data on 53 countres n 016. Let p_local be the prce of a Bg Mac (the McDonald s hamburger) n country n local currency n 016. Let e be the exchange rate for country aganst the US dollar n 016 (that s, e s the number of unts of local currency that can be exchanged for one US dollar n 016). (a) Data on three of the 53 countres s shown n the followng table. Country Currency p_local e Inda Rupee 17 66.8 Swtzerland Franc 6.5 1.01 Brazl Real 13.5 4.0 Compute the prce of a Bg Mac n each of the three countres n US dollars. On ths bass, whch of the three currences appears under-valued n 016, and whch appears over-valued? [7] The followng regresson model s estmated usng data from all 53 countres n 016 (p_usa s the prce of a Bg Mac n the USA n 016): _ log p local 1 log e u ; 1,,53 p_ usa Followng the regresson, two tests are performed. The results are as follows:. regress log_p_rato log_e Source SS df MS Number of obs = 53 -------------+---------------------------------- F(1, 51) = 935.98 Model 31.7459 1 31.7459 Prob > F = 0.0000 Resdual 5.5885653 51.10957971 R-squared = 0.989 -------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.986 Total 37.3184 5 6.9447738 Root MSE =.33103 log_p_rato Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- log_e.938301.017157 54.18 0.000.89868.967391 _cons -.81081.0610954-4.60 0.000 -.4037363 -.158479. test (_b[_cons]=0) (_b[log_e]=1) ( 1) _cons = 0 ( ) log_e = 1 F(, 51) = 54.49 Prob > F = 0.0000. test (_b[log_e]=1) ( 1) log_e = 1 F( 1, 51) = 15. Prob > F = 0.0003

(b) Page 7 Consder the two tests performed followng the regresson above. The frst test s a test of the Law of One Prce (LOP). Explan the concept of LOP. Is t rejected by the 016 Bg Mac data? Whch theory s beng tested by the second test? Is t rejected? [7] A further varable, gdp_rato, s generated, defned as GDP per head n the local country n US dollars dvded by GDP per head n the USA. Ths varable s added to the regresson, wth the results:. regress log_p_rato log_e gdp_rato Source SS df MS Number of obs = 53 -------------+---------------------------------- F(, 50) = 053.75 Model 33.376414 161.68807 Prob > F = 0.0000 Resdual 3.9364105 50.0787805 R-squared = 0.9880 -------------+---------------------------------- Adj R-squared = 0.9875 Total 37.3184 5 6.9447738 Root MSE =.8059 log_p_rato Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- log_e.9796333.0178135 54.99 0.000.9438538 1.015413 gdp_rato.594401.1155731 4.58 0.000.973048.7615754 _cons -.66664.09808-6.76 0.000 -.8596675 -.4656605 (c) Does gdp-rato have a sgnfcant effect on log_p_rato? What s the name of the theory that s beng confrmed by ths test? Does the test result provde an explanaton for the results of the tests carred out n (b)? Explan your answer. [6] TURN OVER

QUESTION 4 [35 Marks] Page 8 A sample of 753 marred women (aged 30 60 years) s drawn, and the followng characterstcs are recorded: Y: One f the woman s workng; zero f out of the labour market Cty: One f the famly lves s a large cty; zero otherwse Age: Age n years Chldren6: Number of chldren aged less than 6 years Chldren18: Number of chldren aged between 6 and 18 years old Educaton: Years of educaton Husbandhours: Husband s usual hours of work Husbandage Husband s age Husbandeduc Husband s years of educaton Two logt models are estmated, wth Y as the dependent varable. The results are shown n the followng table. The numbers n parentheses are the asymptotc standard errors. Model 1 Model Constant 1.008 (0.771).364 (0.884) Cty -0.148 (0.169) -0.139 (0.174) Age -0.06 (0.013) -0.040 (0.0) Chldren6-1.469 (0.195) -1.51 (0.199) Chldren18-0.091 (0.067) -0.079 (0.067) Educaton 0.04 (0.038) 0.68 (0.047) Husbandhours -0.0003(0.0014) Husbandage -0.031 (0.0) Husbandeduc -0.074 (0.035) LogL -464.651-458.16 (a) (b) (c) (d) A researcher was asked to estmate the probablty of a marred woman (aged 30 60 years) workng. He/she estmated a logt model, but was not sure whether a probt or lnear probablty model should have been estmated nstead. What advce can you offer? [5] Usng Model 1, consder the sgns of the coeffcents for the fve explanatory varables. Are they what you would expect? Explan your answers. [4] Usng Model 1: Test for the ndvdual sgnfcance of the fve explanatory varables. Are marred women who lve n large ctes more lkely to work than those who do not? [6] Conduct a lkelhood rato (LR) test of the jont sgnfcance of Husbandhours, Husbandage and Husbandeduc. Do these varables affect the marred woman s workng decson? [4]

(e) (f) Page 9 Usng Model, predct the probablty of workng for a 40 year-old marred woman who does not lve n a large cty, who has1 years of educaton, who has chldren age less than 6, who has no chldren aged between 6 and 18, whose 45 year-old husband works 40 hours per week and has 17 years of educaton. [8] Now assume that the marred woman has four optons; her choces are: 1. Work full-tme. Work part-tme 3. Self-employed (work for herself) 4. Do not work Whch model could be used to estmate the probablty of the marred woman choosng one of these optons? How would you nterpret the effect of age n such a model? [4] (g) Explan why the assumpton of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatves (IIA) mght be volated n ths stuaton. [4] END OF PAPER

The smple regresson model Consder the model: Y X u,...,n. 1 1 Page 10 Econometrc Methods Formula Sheet The ordnary least squares estmators of and 1 are: ( X X )Y ˆ ( X X ) ˆ Y ˆ 1 The ftted values of Y are gven by: ˆ ˆ X Ŷ 1 X The resduals are: û Y Ŷ The standard error of the regresson s gven by: û ˆ n The estmated standard errors of and 1 are gven by: se( ˆ ) ˆ se( ˆ ) ˆ 1 1 ( X X ) 1 X n ( X X ) Testng jont restrctons n the multple regresson model Let n be the sample sze, let r be the number of restrctons under test, let k be the number of parameters n the unrestrcted model, let R U be the R n the unrestrcted model and let R R be the R n the restrcted model. Under the null hypothess that the r restrctons are true, the F-statstc (R U R F ( 1 R U R ) /(n ) / r k ) has an Fr,n-k dstrbuton, that s, an F dstrbuton wth r, n-k degrees of freedom. The Logt Model exp( x' ) P(Y 1) 1 exp( x ' )

Page 11 Table 1: Crtcal values of the t-dstrbuton df = 0.10 = 0.05 = 0.05 = 0.01 = 0.005 1 3.08 6.31 1.71 31.8 63.66 1.89.9 4.30 6.97 9.93 3 1.64.35 3.18 4.54 5.84 4 1.53.13.78 3.75 4.60 5 1.48.0.57 3.37 4.03 6 1.44 1.94.45 3.14 3.71 7 1.4 1.90.37 3.00 3.50 8 1.40 1.86.31.90 3.36 9 1.38 1.83.6.8 3.5 10 1.37 1.81.3.76 3.17 11 1.36 1.80.0.7 3.11 1 1.36 1.78.18.68 3.06 13 1.35 1.77.16.65 3.01 14 1.35 1.76.15.6.98 15 1.34 1.75.13.60.95 16 1.34 1.75.1.58.9 17 1.33 1.74.11.57.90 18 1.33 1.73.10.55.88 19 1.33 1.73.09.54.86 0 1.33 1.73.09.53.85 1 1.3 1.7.08.5.83 1.3 1.7.07.51.8 3 1.3 1.71.07.50.81 4 1.3 1.71.06.49.80 5 1.3 1.71.06.49.79 6 1.3 1.70.06.48.78 7 1.31 1.70.05.47.77 8 1.31 1.70.05.47.76 9 1.31 1.70.04.46.76 30 1.31 1.70.04.46.75 40 1.30 1.68.0.4.70 50 1.30 1.68.01.40.68 60 1.30 1.67.00.39.66 70 1.9 1.67 1.99.38.65 80 1.9 1.66 1.99.37.64 90 1.9 1.66 1.99.37.63 100 1.9 1.66 1.98.36.63 15 1.9 1.66 1.98.36.6 150 1.9 1.65 1.98.35.61 00 1.9 1.65 1.97.35.60 1.8 1.64 1.96.33.58

Page 1 Table : Crtcal values of the F- dstrbuton ( =0.05) df1=1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 15 df=1 161.4 199.5 15.7 4.6 30. 34.0 37.0 38.9 41.9 45.9 18.51 19.00 19.16 19.5 19.30 19.33 19.4 19.37 19.40 19.43 3 10.13 9.55 9.8 9.1 9.01 8.94 8.89 8.85 8.79 8.70 4 7.71 6.94 6.59 6.39 6.6 6.16 6.09 6.04 5.96 5.86 5 6.61 5.79 5.41 5.19 5.05 4.95 4.88 4.8 4.74 4.6 6 5.99 5.14 4.76 4.53 4.39 4.8 4.1 4.15 4.06 3.94 7 5.59 4.74 4.35 4.1 3.97 3.87 3.79 3.73 3.64 3.51 8 5.3 4.46 4.07 3.84 3.69 3.58 3.50 3.44 3.35 3. 9 5.1 4.6 3.86 3.63 3.48 3.37 3.9 3.3 3.14 3.01 10 4.96 4.10 3.71 3.48 3.33 3. 3.14 3.07.98.85 11 4.84 3.98 3.59 3.36 3.0 3.09 3.01.95.85.7 1 4.75 3.89 3.49 3.6 3.11 3.00.91.85.75.6 13 4.67 3.81 3.41 3.18 3.03.9.83.77.67.53 14 4.60 3.74 3.34 3.11.96.85.76.70.60.46 15 4.54 3.68 3.9 3.06.90.79.71.64.54.40 16 4.49 3.63 3.4 3.01.85.74.66.59.49.35 17 4.45 3.59 3.0.96.81.70.61.55.45.31 18 4.41 3.55 3.16.93.77.66.58.51.41.7 19 4.38 3.5 3.13.90.74.63.54.48.38.3 0 4.35 3.49 3.10.87.71.60.51.45.35.0 1 4.3 3.47 3.07.84.68.57.49.4.3.18 4.30 3.44 3.05.8.66.55.46.40.30.15 3 4.8 3.4 3.03.80.64.53.44.37.7.13 4 4.6 3.40 3.01.78.6.51.4.36.5.11 5 4.4 3.39.99.76.60.49.40.34.4.09 6 4.3 3.37.98.74.59.47.39.3..07 7 4.1 3.35.96.73.57.46.37.31.0.06 8 4.0 3.34.95.71.56.45.36.9.19.04 9 4.18 3.33.93.70.55.43.35.8.18.03 30 4.17 3.3.9.69.53.4.33.7.16.01 40 4.08 3.3.84.61.45.34.5.18.08 1.9 50 4.03 3.18.79.56.40.9.0.13.03 1.87 60 4.00 3.15.76.53.37.5.17.10 1.99 1.84 70 3.98 3.13.74.50.35.3.14.07 1.97 1.81 80 3.96 3.11.7.49.33.1.13.06 1.95 1.79 90 3.95 3.10.71.47.3.0.11.04 1.94 1.78 100 3.94 3.09.70.46.31.19.10.03 1.93 1.77 15 3.9 3.07.68.44.9.17.09.01 1.91 1.75 150 3.90 3.06.66.43.7.16.08.00 1.89 1.73 00 3.89 3.04.65.4.6.14.06 1.98 1.88 1.7 3.84 3.00.60.37.1.10.01 1.94 1.83 1.67

Page 13 Table 4: Crtcal values of the -dstrbuton df = 0.10 = 0.05 = 0.05 = 0.01 = 0.005 1.71 3.84 5.0 6.64 7.88 4.61 5.99 7.38 9.1 10.60 3 6.5 7.8 9.35 11.34 1.84 4 7.78 9.49 11.14 13.8 14.86 5 9.4 11.07 1.83 15.09 16.75 6 10.64 1.59 14.45 16.81 18.55 7 1.0 14.07 16.01 18.48 0.8 8 13.36 15.51 17.53 0.09 1.95 9 14.68 16.9 19.0 1.67 3.59 10 15.99 18.31 0.48 3.1 5.19 11 17.8 19.68 1.9 4.7 6.76 1 18.55 1.03 3.34 6. 8.30 13 19.81.36 4.74 7.69 9.8 14 1.06 3.68 6.1 9.14 31.3 15.31 5.00 7.49 30.58 3.80 END OF MATERIALS