Smith normal forms of matrices associated with the Grassmann graphs of lines in

Similar documents
Smith Normal Forms of Strongly Regular graphs

The critical group of a graph

arxiv: v2 [math.co] 6 Oct 2016

Course : Algebraic Combinatorics

Root system chip-firing

Note that a unit is unique: 1 = 11 = 1. Examples: Nonnegative integers under addition; all integers under multiplication.

On the critical group of the n-cube

A Questionable Distance-Regular Graph

GRE Subject test preparation Spring 2016 Topic: Abstract Algebra, Linear Algebra, Number Theory.

WHAT IS a sandpile? Lionel Levine and James Propp

The Structure of the Jacobian Group of a Graph. A Thesis Presented to The Division of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Reed College

Lecture 7 Cyclic groups and subgroups

Smith Normal Form and Combinatorics

Chip-Firing and the Critical Group of a Graph

On the Sandpile Group of Circulant Graphs

INVARIANT DISTRIBUTIONS ON PROJECTIVE SPACES OVER LOCAL FIELDS

1 Fields and vector spaces

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems

Computing the rank of configurations on Complete Graphs

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

Spanning Trees of Shifted Simplicial Complexes

Smith Normal Form and Combinatorics


Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

Abelian Networks. Lionel Levine. Berkeley combinatorics seminar. November 7, 2011

Critical Groups for Cayley Graphs of Bent Functions

The Zeta Function of a Cyclic Language with Connections to Elliptic Curves and Chip-Firing Games

MATH 665: TROPICAL BRILL-NOETHER THEORY

Ring Theory Problems. A σ

Very few Moore Graphs

Math 3121, A Summary of Sections 0,1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9

1.4 Solvable Lie algebras

Simplification by Truth Table and without Truth Table

RSI 2009 ABSTRACTS Anirudha Balasubramanian

x y B =. v u Note that the determinant of B is xu + yv = 1. Thus B is invertible, with inverse u y v x On the other hand, d BA = va + ub 2

Eighth Homework Solutions

A lower bound for the Laplacian eigenvalues of a graph proof of a conjecture by Guo

The Matrix-Tree Theorem

0.2 Vector spaces. J.A.Beachy 1

Radon Transforms and the Finite General Linear Groups

Some Catalan Musings p. 1. Some Catalan Musings. Richard P. Stanley

A chip-firing game and Dirichlet eigenvalues

BENJAMIN LEVINE. 2. Principal Ideal Domains We will first investigate the properties of principal ideal domains and unique factorization domains.

Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society

Notation. 0,1,2,, 1 with addition and multiplication modulo

Some Notes on Distance-Transitive and Distance-Regular Graphs

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS

Some constructions of integral graphs

Simplification by Truth Table and without Truth Table

Automorphisms of strongly regular graphs and PDS in Abelian groups

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

MA Discrete Mathematics

MAT534 Fall 2013 Practice Midterm I The actual midterm will consist of five problems.

Simplification by Truth Table and without Truth Table

Binomial Exercises A = 1 1 and 1

. Here the flats of H(2d 1, q 2 ) consist of all nonzero totally isotropic

LECTURE 13. Quotient Spaces

An algebraic proof of the Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem for intersecting families of perfect matchings

DIVISOR THEORY ON TROPICAL AND LOG SMOOTH CURVES

Algebraically defined graphs and generalized quadrangles

Math 250: Higher Algebra Representations of finite groups

Handout to Wu Characteristic Harvard math table talk Oliver Knill, 3/8/2016

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

18.312: Algebraic Combinatorics Lionel Levine. Lecture (u, v) is a horizontal edge K u,v = i (u, v) is a vertical edge 0 else

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.

Linear Algebra. Workbook

Math 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems

Spanning Trees and a Conjecture of Kontsevich

MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 20: Review for Test 1.

arxiv: v4 [math.co] 14 Apr 2017

CHIP-FIRING GAMES, G-PARKING FUNCTIONS, AND AN EFFICIENT BIJECTIVE PROOF OF THE MATRIX-TREE THEOREM

Topics in Graph Theory

A Little Beyond: Linear Algebra

MATH 420 FINAL EXAM J. Beachy, 5/7/97

The number of homomorphisms from a finite group to a general linear group

Monoids. Definition: A binary operation on a set M is a function : M M M. Examples:

Math 594. Solutions 5

Name: Solutions Final Exam

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017

is an isomorphism, and V = U W. Proof. Let u 1,..., u m be a basis of U, and add linearly independent

On algebras arising from semiregular group actions

Some Catalan Musings p. 1. Some Catalan Musings. Richard P. Stanley

Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 3 Due Friday, February 5 at 08:35

SUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUIS-PHILIPPE THIBAULT

An Introduction to Spectral Graph Theory

Chip-Firing and Rotor-Routing on Z d and on Trees

Maximal non-commuting subsets of groups

Algebra Exam Syllabus

Algebraic Structures Exam File Fall 2013 Exam #1

18.312: Algebraic Combinatorics Lionel Levine. Lecture 22. Smith normal form of an integer matrix (linear algebra over Z).

1. What is the determinant of the following matrix? a 1 a 2 4a 3 2a 2 b 1 b 2 4b 3 2b c 1. = 4, then det

New Bounds for Partial Spreads of H(2d 1, q 2 ) and Partial Ovoids of the Ree-Tits Octagon

Abstract Algebra Study Sheet

Spectral characterization of Signed Graphs

May 6, Be sure to write your name on your bluebook. Use a separate page (or pages) for each problem. Show all of your work.

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

BP -HOMOLOGY AND AN IMPLICATION FOR SYMMETRIC POLYNOMIALS. 1. Introduction and results

Laplacians of Graphs, Spectra and Laplacian polynomials

Transcription:

Smith normal forms of matrices associated with the Grassmann graphs of lines in PG(n, q) Peter Sin, U. of Florida UD Discrete Math Seminar November th, 206

Smith normal forms Graphs from lines Smith normal forms Chip-firing game Cross-characteristics Defining characteristic

Critical groups of graphs Graphs from lines Smith normal forms Chip-firing game Cross-characteristics Defining characteristic

Grassmann and skew lines graphs q = p t, p prime, V = F n q,

Grassmann and skew lines graphs q = p t, p prime, V = F n q, Γ = Γ (n, q) Grassman graph, vertices are lines of PG(V ), i.e. 2-diml subspaces of V. Two vertices lie on an edge iff the subspaces are distinct and have nonzero intersection.

Grassmann and skew lines graphs q = p t, p prime, V = F n q, Γ = Γ (n, q) Grassman graph, vertices are lines of PG(V ), i.e. 2-diml subspaces of V. Two vertices lie on an edge iff the subspaces are distinct and have nonzero intersection. Γ the complementary graph, is the skew lines graph.

Strongly Regular Graphs Definition A strongly regular graph with parameters (v, k, λ, µ) is a k-regular graph such that any two adjacent vertices have λ neighbors in common; and any two nonadjacent vertices have µ neighbors in common. The adjacency matrix of a SRG has three eigenvalues k, r, s.

Strongly Regular Graphs Definition A strongly regular graph with parameters (v, k, λ, µ) is a k-regular graph such that any two adjacent vertices have λ neighbors in common; and any two nonadjacent vertices have µ neighbors in common. The adjacency matrix of a SRG has three eigenvalues k, r, s. Γ is a SRG v = [ n 2 ] q, k = q(q + )[ ] n 2 q, λ = [ ] n q + q2 2, µ = (q + ) 2, r = [ n ] q and s = (q + ) [ n ] q.

Strongly Regular Graphs Definition A strongly regular graph with parameters (v, k, λ, µ) is a k-regular graph such that any two adjacent vertices have λ neighbors in common; and any two nonadjacent vertices have µ neighbors in common. The adjacency matrix of a SRG has three eigenvalues k, r, s. Γ is a SRG v = [ n 2 ] q, k = q(q + )[ ] n 2 q, λ = [ ] n q + q2 2, µ = (q + ) 2, r = [ n ] q and s = (q + ) [ ] n q. Γ is also a SRG. So we have two families of SRGs paramtrized by n, p and t.

Critical groups of graphs Graphs from lines Smith normal forms Chip-firing game Cross-characteristics Defining characteristic

Smith Normal form A(G), an adjacency matrix of a graph G.

Smith Normal form A(G), an adjacency matrix of a graph G. L(G) = D(G) A(G), Laplacian matrix.

Smith Normal form A(G), an adjacency matrix of a graph G. L(G) = D(G) A(G), Laplacian matrix. The Smith normal forms of A(G) and L(G) are invariants of G.

Smith Normal form A(G), an adjacency matrix of a graph G. L(G) = D(G) A(G), Laplacian matrix. The Smith normal forms of A(G) and L(G) are invariants of G. S(G), the abelian group whose cyclic decomposition is given by the SNF of A(G), (Smith group).

Smith Normal form A(G), an adjacency matrix of a graph G. L(G) = D(G) A(G), Laplacian matrix. The Smith normal forms of A(G) and L(G) are invariants of G. S(G), the abelian group whose cyclic decomposition is given by the SNF of A(G), (Smith group). K (G), the finite part of the abelian group whose cyclic decomposition is given by the SNF of L(G) (critical group, sandpile group, jacobian).

Smith Normal form A(G), an adjacency matrix of a graph G. L(G) = D(G) A(G), Laplacian matrix. The Smith normal forms of A(G) and L(G) are invariants of G. S(G), the abelian group whose cyclic decomposition is given by the SNF of A(G), (Smith group). K (G), the finite part of the abelian group whose cyclic decomposition is given by the SNF of L(G) (critical group, sandpile group, jacobian). K (G) = number of spanning trees (Kirchhoff s Matrix-tree Theorem).

Smith Normal form A(G), an adjacency matrix of a graph G. L(G) = D(G) A(G), Laplacian matrix. The Smith normal forms of A(G) and L(G) are invariants of G. S(G), the abelian group whose cyclic decomposition is given by the SNF of A(G), (Smith group). K (G), the finite part of the abelian group whose cyclic decomposition is given by the SNF of L(G) (critical group, sandpile group, jacobian). K (G) = number of spanning trees (Kirchhoff s Matrix-tree Theorem). Survey article on SNFs in combinatorics by R. Stanley (JCTA 206).

Critical groups of graphs Graphs from lines Smith normal forms Chip-firing game Cross-characteristics Defining characteristic

Rules -0 2 0 5 A configuration on the graph G is an assignment of a nonnegative integer s(v) to each round vertex v and v s(v) to the square vertex.

Rules -0 2 0 5 A configuration on the graph G is an assignment of a nonnegative integer s(v) to each round vertex v and v s(v) to the square vertex. A round vertex v can be fired if it has at least deg(v) chips.

Rules -0-0 2 3 2 0 5 0 2 2 A configuration on the graph G is an assignment of a nonnegative integer s(v) to each round vertex v and v s(v) to the square vertex. A round vertex v can be fired if it has at least deg(v) chips.

Rules -0-0 2 3 2 0 5 0 2 2 A configuration on the graph G is an assignment of a nonnegative integer s(v) to each round vertex v and v s(v) to the square vertex. A round vertex v can be fired if it has at least deg(v) chips.

Rules -0-0 2 3 2 0 5 0 2 2 A configuration on the graph G is an assignment of a nonnegative integer s(v) to each round vertex v and v s(v) to the square vertex. A round vertex v can be fired if it has at least deg(v) chips. The square vertex is fired only when no others can be fired.

Example game -2 0

Example game 2-2 -4 0

Example game 2 3-2 -4-6 0 2

Example game 2 3 0-2 -4-6 2-5 0 2 3

Example game 2 3 0-2 -4-6 2-5 0 2 3 3-4 0

Example game 2 3 0-2 -4-6 2-5 0 2 3 2 3-4 -4 0

Relation with Laplacian Start with a configuration s and fire vertices in a sequence where each vertex v is fired x(v) times, ending up with configuration s.

Relation with Laplacian Start with a configuration s and fire vertices in a sequence where each vertex v is fired x(v) times, ending up with configuration s. s (v) = s(v) x(v) deg(v) + (v,w) E x(w)

Relation with Laplacian Start with a configuration s and fire vertices in a sequence where each vertex v is fired x(v) times, ending up with configuration s. s (v) = s(v) x(v) deg(v) + (v,w) E x(w) s = s L(G)x.

Relation with Laplacian Start with a configuration s and fire vertices in a sequence where each vertex v is fired x(v) times, ending up with configuration s. s (v) = s(v) x(v) deg(v) + (v,w) E x(w) s = s L(G)x. A configuration is stable if no round vertex can be fired, recurrent if there is a sequence of firings leading back to the same configuration, critical if recurrent and stable. Theorem (Dhar, Björner-Lovász, Biggs, Gabrielov,...) Consider the chip-firing game on a connected graph G. Any starting configuration leads to a unique critical configuration. The set of critical configurations has a natural group operation making it isomorphic to the critical group K (G).

GL(n, q)-permutation modules We (Ducey-S) compute the SNF for A = A(Γ(n, q)), L = L(Γ(n, q)), A = A(Γ (n, q)), L = L(Γ (n, q)).

GL(n, q)-permutation modules We (Ducey-S) compute the SNF for A = A(Γ(n, q)), L = L(Γ(n, q)), A = A(Γ (n, q)), L = L(Γ (n, q)). L r, the set of r-diml. subspaces of V.

GL(n, q)-permutation modules We (Ducey-S) compute the SNF for A = A(Γ(n, q)), L = L(Γ(n, q)), A = A(Γ (n, q)), L = L(Γ (n, q)). L r, the set of r-diml. subspaces of V. A and L define Z GL(n, q)-module homomorphisms A, L : Z L 2 Z L 2

GL(n, q)-permutation modules We (Ducey-S) compute the SNF for A = A(Γ(n, q)), L = L(Γ(n, q)), A = A(Γ (n, q)), L = L(Γ (n, q)). L r, the set of r-diml. subspaces of V. A and L define Z GL(n, q)-module homomorphisms A, L : Z L 2 Z L 2 SNF can be computed one prime at a time (elementary divisors).

GL(n, q)-permutation modules We (Ducey-S) compute the SNF for A = A(Γ(n, q)), L = L(Γ(n, q)), A = A(Γ (n, q)), L = L(Γ (n, q)). L r, the set of r-diml. subspaces of V. A and L define Z GL(n, q)-module homomorphisms A, L : Z L 2 Z L 2 SNF can be computed one prime at a time (elementary divisors). Fix prime l M = Z L 2 l, M = FL 2 l, α {A, L}.

GL(n, q)-permutation modules We (Ducey-S) compute the SNF for A = A(Γ(n, q)), L = L(Γ(n, q)), A = A(Γ (n, q)), L = L(Γ (n, q)). L r, the set of r-diml. subspaces of V. A and L define Z GL(n, q)-module homomorphisms A, L : Z L 2 Z L 2 SNF can be computed one prime at a time (elementary divisors). Fix prime l M = Z L 2 l, M = FL 2 l, α {A, L}. M = M 0 M M r = Ker(α) 0. M = M 0 M M r = Ker(α) 0.

e i = e i (α) := multiplicity of l i as an elementary divisor of α. (e 0 = rank(α)).

e i = e i (α) := multiplicity of l i as an elementary divisor of α. (e 0 = rank(α)). dim M a = + i a e i.

e i = e i (α) := multiplicity of l i as an elementary divisor of α. (e 0 = rank(α)). dim M a = + i a e i. All quotients M a /M a+ are F l GL(n, q)-modules, so the number of nonzero e i is at most the composition length of M as a F l GL(n, q)-module.

Critical groups of graphs Graphs from lines Smith normal forms Chip-firing game Cross-characteristics Defining characteristic

l-modular representations of GL(n, q) l p

l-modular representations of GL(n, q) l p Theory due to G. D. James.

l-modular representations of GL(n, q) l p Theory due to G. D. James. M is a q-analogue of the F l -permutation module of subsets of size 2 in a set of size n.

l-modular representations of GL(n, q) l p Theory due to G. D. James. M is a q-analogue of the F l -permutation module of subsets of size 2 in a set of size n. M has 3 isomorphism types of composition factors.

l-modular representations of GL(n, q) l p Theory due to G. D. James. M is a q-analogue of the F l -permutation module of subsets of size 2 in a set of size n. M has 3 isomorphism types of composition factors. The composition length is 6 and does not grow with n or t or p, but depends on certain divisibility conditions.

l-modular representations of GL(n, q) l p Theory due to G. D. James. M is a q-analogue of the F l -permutation module of subsets of size 2 in a set of size n. M has 3 isomorphism types of composition factors. The composition length is 6 and does not grow with n or t or p, but depends on certain divisibility conditions. Based on James results, it is easy to work out the submodule structure of M in all cases.

l [ ] n 2 q l [ ] n 2 q l q + l q + [ ] l n l [ ] n q q M = F l D D 2 M = F l D D 2 M = D F l D 2 F l N/A l n 2 M = F l D D 2 N/A F l l n 2 M = D D 2 F l Table : l ( ) n q N/A D

[ l q+ ] l n q l [ ] n 2 q F l M= D D 2 F l l q+ l n 2 N/A l [ n 2 ] q D l [ ] n 2 q N/A l [ n 2 ] q D l q+ l n M = F l D 2 F l D 2 N/A M=F l Table : l ( n ) q D F l D 2 F l D M = F l D 2 F l D

Example: l q +, n even Assume l q +, n even.

Example: l q +, n even Assume l q +, n even. Then k = q(q + ) 2 h, r = (q + )(qh ), s = (q + ), where h := qn 2 q 2.

Example: l q +, n even Assume l q +, n even. Then k = q(q + ) 2 h, r = (q + )(qh ), s = (q + ), where h := qn 2 q 2. r has multiplicity f = [ n ] q, s has multiplicity g = [ n 2 ] q [ n ] q.

Example: l q +, n even Assume l q +, n even. Then k = q(q + ) 2 h, r = (q + )(qh ), s = (q + ), where h := qn 2 q 2. r has multiplicity f = [ n ] q, s has multiplicity g = [ n 2 ] q [ n ] q. Let a = v l (q + ), b = v l (qh ) and c = v l (h).

Example: l q +, n even Assume l q +, n even. Then k = q(q + ) 2 h, r = (q + )(qh ), s = (q + ), where h := qn 2 q 2. r has multiplicity f = [ n ] q, s has multiplicity g = [ n 2 ] q [ n ] q. Let a = v l (q + ), b = v l (qh ) and c = v l (h). l h if and only if l n 2 2

Example: l q +, n even Assume l q +, n even. Then k = q(q + ) 2 h, r = (q + )(qh ), s = (q + ), where h := qn 2 q 2. r has multiplicity f = [ n ] q, s has multiplicity g = [ n 2 ] q [ n ] q. Let a = v l (q + ), b = v l (qh ) and c = v l (h). l h if and only if l n 2 2 gcd(h, qh ) =, so either c = 0 or b = 0.

Example: l q +, n even Assume l q +, n even. Then k = q(q + ) 2 h, r = (q + )(qh ), s = (q + ), where h := qn 2 q 2. r has multiplicity f = [ n ] q, s has multiplicity g = [ n 2 ] q [ n ] q. Let a = v l (q + ), b = v l (qh ) and c = v l (h). l h if and only if l n 2 2 gcd(h, qh ) =, so either c = 0 or b = 0. b = 0 if and only if l [ n 2 ] q.

Example: l q +, n even Assume l q +, n even. Then k = q(q + ) 2 h, r = (q + )(qh ), s = (q + ), where h := qn 2 q 2. r has multiplicity f = [ n ] q, s has multiplicity g = [ n 2 ] q [ n ] q. Let a = v l (q + ), b = v l (qh ) and c = v l (h). l h if and only if l n 2 2 gcd(h, qh ) =, so either c = 0 or b = 0. b = 0 if and only if l [ n 2 ] q. We ll look at the case c = 0 and b = 0. Then v l (r) = v l (s) = a and v l ( S(Γ) ) = af + ag + 2a

Example: l q +, n even, v l (r) = v l (s) = a M = Z l Y.

Example: l q +, n even, v l (r) = v l (s) = a M = Z l Y. On Y = Ker(J) we have A (A (r + s)i) = rsi.

Example: l q +, n even, v l (r) = v l (s) = a M = Z l Y. On Y = Ker(J) we have A (A (r + s)i) = rsi. This shows that (A (r + s)i)(y ) M 2a Y, so as l (r + s), A (Y ) M 2a Y.

Example: l q +, n even, v l (r) = v l (s) = a M = Z l Y. On Y = Ker(J) we have A (A (r + s)i) = rsi. This shows that (A (r + s)i)(y ) M 2a Y, so as l (r + s), A (Y ) M 2a Y. A (Y ) is nonzero, so it has D as a composition factor.

Example: l q +, n even, v l (r) = v l (s) = a M = Z l Y. On Y = Ker(J) we have A (A (r + s)i) = rsi. This shows that (A (r + s)i)(y ) M 2a Y, so as l (r + s), A (Y ) M 2a Y. A (Y ) is nonzero, so it has D as a composition factor. dim M 2a Y f and so dim M 2a f.

Example: l q +, n even, v l (r) = v l (s) = a M = Z l Y. On Y = Ker(J) we have A (A (r + s)i) = rsi. This shows that (A (r + s)i)(y ) M 2a Y, so as l (r + s), A (Y ) M 2a Y. A (Y ) is nonzero, so it has D as a composition factor. dim M 2a Y f and so dim M 2a f. Further analysis of A and structure of M shows dim M a = g + 2.

We have dim M 2a f, dim M a = g + 2.

We have dim M 2a f, dim M a = g + 2. a(f + g) + 2a = v l ( S(Γ) ) = ie i i 0 ie i + ie i a a i<2a a i<2a i 2a e i + 2a i 2a a(dim M a dim M 2a ) + 2a dim M 2a a(g + 2) + af. Therefore, equality holds throughout, and it follows that e 0 = f, e a = g f + 2, e 2a = f (and e i = 0 otherwise). e i

Critical groups of graphs Graphs from lines Smith normal forms Chip-firing game Cross-characteristics Defining characteristic

Here the number of composition factors of M grows like n t, where q = p t.

Here the number of composition factors of M grows like n t, where q = p t. But from the eigenvalues, L has no p-elementary divisors.

Here the number of composition factors of M grows like n t, where q = p t. But from the eigenvalues, L has no p-elementary divisors. For A, we can see that only k is divisible by p, so S(Γ ) is cyclic of order p t.

Here the number of composition factors of M grows like n t, where q = p t. But from the eigenvalues, L has no p-elementary divisors. For A, we can see that only k is divisible by p, so S(Γ ) is cyclic of order p t. The skew lines matrices A and L are much harder but much of the difficulty was handled in earlier work for the case n = 4 (Brouwer-Ducey-S.)

Here the number of composition factors of M grows like n t, where q = p t. But from the eigenvalues, L has no p-elementary divisors. For A, we can see that only k is divisible by p, so S(Γ ) is cyclic of order p t. The skew lines matrices A and L are much harder but much of the difficulty was handled in earlier work for the case n = 4 (Brouwer-Ducey-S.) Note A L mod (p 4t ), so just consider A.

Example Table : The elementary divisors of the incidence matrix of lines vs. lines in PG(3, 9), where two lines are incident when skew. Elem. Div. 3 3 2 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 8 Multiplicity 36 256 6025 202 256 36

For n = 4 we have A(A + q(q )I) = q 3 I + q 3 (q )J,

For n = 4 we have A(A + q(q )I) = q 3 I + q 3 (q )J, For general n, we have A(A + q( [ ] n 2 q 2)I) = q 3[ n 3 ]q I + q3 [ n 3 ] q ( [ ) n ]q (q + 2) J, q +

Reductions using SRG equation p [ n 2 ] q so Z L 2 p = Z p Y, Y = Ker(J)

Reductions using SRG equation p [ n 2 ] q so Z L 2 p = Z p Y, Y = Ker(J) A() = k = q 4[ ] n 2 2 q, so e 4t.

Reductions using SRG equation p [ n 2 ] q so Z L 2 p = Z p Y, Y = Ker(J) A() = k = q 4[ ] n 2 2 q, so e 4t. We have A Y [A Y qz I] = q 3 z 2 I, where z, z 2 are units in Z p.

Reductions using SRG equation p [ n 2 ] q so Z L 2 p = Z p Y, Y = Ker(J) A() = k = q 4[ ] n 2 2 q, so e 4t. We have A Y [A Y qz I] = q 3 z 2 I, where z, z 2 are units in Z p. This equation implies:

Reductions using SRG equation p [ n 2 ] q so Z L 2 p = Z p Y, Y = Ker(J) A() = k = q 4[ ] n 2 2 q, so e 4t. We have A Y [A Y qz I] = q 3 z 2 I, where z, z 2 are units in Z p. This equation implies:. A Y has no elementary divisors p i for i > 3t.

Reductions using SRG equation p [ n 2 ] q so Z L 2 p = Z p Y, Y = Ker(J) A() = k = q 4[ ] n 2 2 q, so e 4t. We have A Y [A Y qz I] = q 3 z 2 I, where z, z 2 are units in Z p. This equation implies:. A Y has no elementary divisors p i for i > 3t. 2. e i = e 3t i 0 i < t.

Reductions using SRG equation p [ n 2 ] q so Z L 2 p = Z p Y, Y = Ker(J) A() = k = q 4[ ] n 2 2 q, so e 4t. We have A Y [A Y qz I] = q 3 z 2 I, where z, z 2 are units in Z p. This equation implies:. A Y has no elementary divisors p i for i > 3t. 2. e i = e 3t i 0 i < t. 3. e i = 0 unless 0 i t or 2t i 3t.

Reductions using SRG equation p [ n 2 ] q so Z L 2 p = Z p Y, Y = Ker(J) A() = k = q 4[ ] n 2 2 q, so e 4t. We have A Y [A Y qz I] = q 3 z 2 I, where z, z 2 are units in Z p. This equation implies:. A Y has no elementary divisors p i for i > 3t. 2. e i = e 3t i 0 i < t. 3. e i = 0 unless 0 i t or 2t i 3t. 4. Once we have e i 0 i < t we have them all.

Reduction to point-line incidence A r,s := the skewness matrix of r-subspaces vs. s-subspaces of V. So A = A 2,2.

Reduction to point-line incidence A r,s := the skewness matrix of r-subspaces vs. s-subspaces of V. So A = A 2,2. A r,s A r, A,s (mod p t )

Reduction to point-line incidence A r,s := the skewness matrix of r-subspaces vs. s-subspaces of V. So A = A 2,2. A r,s A r, A,s (mod p t ) Hence e i (A r,s ) = e i (A r, A,s ) for i < t.

Reduction to point-line incidence A r,s := the skewness matrix of r-subspaces vs. s-subspaces of V. So A = A 2,2. A r,s A r, A,s (mod p t ) Hence e i (A r,s ) = e i (A r, A,s ) for i < t. The p-elementary divisors for A r, (and A,r ) were computed by Chandler-Sin-Xiang (2006).

Reduction to point-line incidence A r,s := the skewness matrix of r-subspaces vs. s-subspaces of V. So A = A 2,2. A r,s A r, A,s (mod p t ) Hence e i (A r,s ) = e i (A r, A,s ) for i < t. The p-elementary divisors for A r, (and A,r ) were computed by Chandler-Sin-Xiang (2006). Nontrivial to relate p-elementary divisors of A r, and A,s to those of A r, A,s.

The poset H H := the set of tuples { s = (s 0,..., s t ) such that, for 0 i t,

The poset H H := the set of tuples { s = (s 0,..., s t ) such that, for 0 i t, s i n,

The poset H H := the set of tuples { s = (s 0,..., s t ) such that, for 0 i t, s i n, 0 ps i+ s i (p )n,

The poset H H := the set of tuples { s = (s 0,..., s t ) such that, for 0 i t, s i n, 0 ps i+ s i (p )n, The poset H describes the submodule structure of F L q under the action of GL(n, q). (Bardoe-S (2000)).

The poset H H := the set of tuples { s = (s 0,..., s t ) such that, for 0 i t, s i n, 0 ps i+ s i (p )n, The poset H describes the submodule structure of F L q under the action of GL(n, q). (Bardoe-S (2000)). For s = (s 0,..., s t ) H define d( s) as follows.

The poset H H := the set of tuples { s = (s 0,..., s t ) such that, for 0 i t, s i n, 0 ps i+ s i (p )n, The poset H describes the submodule structure of F L q under the action of GL(n, q). (Bardoe-S (2000)). For s = (s 0,..., s t ) H define d( s) as follows. Set λ i = ps i+ s i (0 i t subscripts mod t).

The poset H H := the set of tuples { s = (s 0,..., s t ) such that, for 0 i t, s i n, 0 ps i+ s i (p )n, The poset H describes the submodule structure of F L q under the action of GL(n, q). (Bardoe-S (2000)). For s = (s 0,..., s t ) H define d( s) as follows. Set λ i = ps i+ s i (0 i t subscripts mod t). d( s) = t i=0 d λ i, where d k := coefficient of x k in the expansion of ( + x + + x p ) n

The poset H H := the set of tuples { s = (s 0,..., s t ) such that, for 0 i t, s i n, 0 ps i+ s i (p )n, The poset H describes the submodule structure of F L q under the action of GL(n, q). (Bardoe-S (2000)). For s = (s 0,..., s t ) H define d( s) as follows. Set λ i = ps i+ s i (0 i t subscripts mod t). d( s) = t i=0 d λ i, where d k := coefficient of x k in the expansion of ( + x + + x p ) n d( s) is the dimension of a GL(n, q) composition factor of F L q.

For nonnegative integers α, β, define the subsets of H and { t } H α (s) = (s 0,..., s t ) H max{0, s s i } = α βh(r) = {(n s 0,..., n s t ) (s 0,..., s t ) H β (r)} { t } = (s 0,..., s t ) H max{0, s i (n r)} = β}. i=0 i=0

General formula for e i (A r, A,s ) Theorem Let E i = e i (A r, A,s ) denote the multiplicity of p i as a p-adic elementary divisor of A r, A,s. E t(r+s) =. For i t(r + s), where Γ(i) = E i = s Γ(i) α+β=i 0 α t(s ) 0 β t(r ) d( s), βh(r) H α (s).

Thank you for your attention!